Mississippi has a rich and complex culture that is deeply influenced by its history and geography. The unspoken culture in Mississippi is characterized by strong traditional values, a deep sense of community, and an emphasis on hospitality and politeness.
It also has a strong religious influence, particularly with Protestant Christianity. Respect for authority and hierarchy is also a common trait in this culture. In terms of comparison, every region has its unique unspoken culture, but there may be some similarities and differences depending on factors such as history, geography, religion, and socioeconomic status.
For example, the unspoken culture in urban areas may differ from rural areas, and the culture in the Northeast may differ from that of the South. It is important to note that these are generalizations and may not apply to every individual or community.
To learn more about culture the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30497684
#SPJ4
--The question is inappropriate, the correct question is:
Describe the unspoken culture in Mississippi. How does this compare to any unspoken culture that you’re aware of where you live? Explain.--
On what day does the constitution state that a new president shall be inaugurated? which amendment establishes this? when must the new congress meet?.
On January 20th the constitution states that a new president shall be inaugurated and this was established by the 20th amendment.
The 20th amendment drawn from the Constitution is specifying the particular term of as being each elected President of the United States. It begins at noon time which is on January 20 of every year followed by the election.
Twentieth Amendment is included in Section 2. As per the amendment, the Congress shall assemble or meet at least once each and every year so that such meeting shall be beginning at noon which will be on the third day of January unless they shall be appointed by law on a different day.
2Oth amendment is commonly known as the “Lame Duck Amendment”. The Twentieth Amendment was generally designed to remove the long period of time excessively so that a defeated president or a particular member of Congress would be continuing for the purpose of serving after his or her bid for reelection as it failed.
The Twentieth Amendment is an amendment proposed by U.S. Constitution that is setting the inauguration date for upcoming new presidential terms as well as the date for new congress sessions.
Learn to know more about the constitutional amendment at
https://brainly.com/question/20336789
#SPJ4
If a married couple decides to get a divorce, what kind of law will handle their case?
Answer:
In Shah Bano case, the Supreme Court held that, it is the responsibility of the husband during the divorce to make a reasonable and fair provision to maintain the former wife under Section 3(1Ha) of Muslim Women(Protection of rights on Divorce Act, 1986.
Answer:
Family law
Explanation:
Family Law court handles divorce, child support, child custody, and adoptions.
two ways the CGE law protects citizens against human rights violations
What has research into the success of probation and parole concluded?
Answer:
parole is so a prisoner can enjpy some freedom but probation is like being free but you can do anything
Explanation:
What are the powers of Congress, described in Article I of the U.S.
Constitution?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; ArtI. S8.
in united states versus verdugo urquidez, the supreme court has held that constitutional protections do not obtain in u.s. government actions against foreign nationals on ______________.
In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, the supreme court held that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
What happened in the case of United States v Verdugo Urquidez?In United States v Verdugo Urquidez, a Mexican national was arrested and his property was searched by U.S. agents. He was then brought to the United States to face drug charges. The defendant contended that his Fourth Amendment rights of the Constitution had been breached by the search and seizure of his house in Mexico, as well as by the search of his vehicle in the United States, without a warrant.
The Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution does not cover illegal searches and seizures carried out by US government officials on foreign soil and that the protections under it do not extend to foreign nationals outside the United States. As a result, the search did not breach the Fourth Amendment.
Henceforth the Supreme Court emphasized in United States v Verdugo Urquidez, that constitutional protections cannot be obtained in U.S. Government actions against foreign nationals on foreign soil.
Learn more about U.S. constitutional protections at: https://brainly.in/question/5984704
#SPJ11
please answer quickly!--
What type of expert witness would testify on previously broken bones of a victim?
Medical
Engineering
Parenting
Vocational
Answer:
Explanation:
The expert witness who would testify on previously broken bones of a victim is a Medical expert. Medical experts are professionals who have extensive knowledge and experience in the medical field and can provide expert opinions on medical issues related to a particular case. In this case, the medical expert would examine the victim's medical records, x-rays, and other relevant medical information to determine the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by the victim, including the previously broken bones. They would then provide expert testimony in court to explain their findings and opinions to the judge and jury.
how does opportunity cost influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answer:
Hope this helps (O) _ (O)
Explanation:
Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.
Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?
Liz agrees to cook twenty dinners for Brian, in exchange for which Brian will repair all of the plumbing in Liz's house. Liz has offered legally
Answer:
Yes?
Explanation:
I don't really know what the question is here but I can say it is legal with exceptions. There is nothing that can get either party sent to jail. There is a downside. Let's say Brian decides that the project is too hard for him and he gives up but Liz has already made 14 dinners and she wants her plumbing fixed. She can't really sue Brian because there were no contracts and no written agreements. It's a case of "He said, she said." In reality, these kinds of deals happen all of the time and it's no big deal.
When money is thrown in, things tend to get more complicated. When someone pays for something, the money changes hands. If the worker doesn't record the payment in his taxes, then it becomes tax evasion and that's real bad.
I don't really know what's happening here but I hope it helps!
WILL GIVE BRAINLIST TO THE FIRST PERSON WHO GIVES THE RIGHT ANSWER
District Courts can only hear cases involving _____ , _____ , and litigants from different states.
A. activist law
B. municipal law
C. appeals
D. state law
E. the Constitution
F. federal law
Answer:
F.
Explanation:
10 points
Which of the following is NOT an option for committees to utilize with respect to a bill?
A recommend not passing
B. recommend passage of the bill
C. recommend passage after amending the bill
D recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill
Answer:
- recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill.
Explanation:
Recommend that the state supreme court decide the fate of the bill is NOT an option for committees to utilize with respect to a bill. Thus, option D is correct.
What is a committee?Committees keep an eye on existing government activities, spot problems that warrant legislative scrutiny, compile and assess data, and suggest actions to take.
The option for parties to use with regard to a bill is NOT to recommend that the state's highest court judge the measure's destiny. So when the original chamber declines to accept the revisions made by the opposing chamber.
The preside executives of every house may create a panel made up of five senators from every chamber to address the disagreements between forms of the resolution that were passed by the legislature. Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about committee, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11621970
#SPJ6
Civil law tradition is not used at any place in Canada, only
Common law is used. True or False
False. Canada has a dual legal system that includes both the Common Law tradition and the Civil Law tradition.
The Common Law tradition is primarily used in most provinces and territories in Canada, including English-speaking provinces such as Ontario, British Columbia, and Alberta. Common Law is based on case law and legal precedent developed through judicial decisions.
However, the province of Quebec follows the Civil Law tradition, which is derived from French civil law principles. The Civil Law system is based on a comprehensive legal code that outlines rights, obligations, and rules governing various aspects of civil life. Quebec's Civil Code, known as the Civil Code of Quebec, is the primary legislation that governs civil matters in the province.
Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the Civil Law tradition is not used in any place in Canada. Quebec, with its distinct legal system, applies the Civil Law tradition alongside the Common Law tradition found in the rest of Canada.
Learn more about Civil Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ11
Which best describes the purpose of this poster?
A. to encourage people to vaccinate their children for the flu
B. to generally promote all vaccinations of any type for children
C. to inform of high flu deaths in children
D. to advertise the flu vaccine's success rate
Answer:
A) to encourage people to vaccinate their children for the flu
(got 100%)
Answer:
a
Explanation:
The House of Representatives impeached the President. During the Senate debate before the
beginning of the impeachment trial phase, a parliamentary rule was offered that requested that
the vote on whether to find the President guilty should be made by secret ballot, rather than by
roll call. A majority of the senators voted in favor of this rule. The President filed a complaint
with a federal district court judge seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot on the
ground that such a practice violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The
Senate majority leader (on behalf of all named parties defendant) filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. How should the district court rule on the motion?
Answer:
The district court should deny the motion to dismiss the complaint. The President's complaint seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial is a valid legal claim. The argument that a secret ballot violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment raises a constitutional issue that merits consideration by the court.
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of an accused person to confront the witnesses against them. In this case, the use of a secret ballot could potentially impact the President's ability to confront the senators who vote against him. By not knowing the identity of those who cast their votes, the President may be deprived of the opportunity to challenge their credibility or question their motives during the trial.
Given the importance of the constitutional issue raised and the potential impact on the President's rights, the district court should allow the case to proceed and conduct a thorough examination of the arguments presented by both parties. It is within the court's jurisdiction to determine whether the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial violates the Confrontation Clause, and such a decision should not be dismissed without proper consideration.
Explanation:
If you see green fluid leaking from your
vehicle, it is most likely_____
motor oil
coolant
water
power steering fluid
A new patient has had no care by any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group within the past {} years. 3. Which type of patient (new ...
The statement suggests that the patient is considered a "new patient" based on the criterion of not having received care from any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group within the past three years.
In medical practice, patients are often categorized as new or established based on their prior interactions with the specific physician or practice. In this context, the patient falls under the category of a "new patient" since they have not received care from any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group for the specified duration of three years.
Learn more about new patient"
https://brainly.com/question/29992408
#SPJ4
a police officer stops a car for a traffic violation. the officer conducts a legal search of the vehicle after obtaining consent from the driver. the officer discovered stolen property and a large amount of illegal prescription drugs in the car. the driver is given a choice to be charged with felony possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance or cooperate with the police to identify and arrest the source of the drugs. what process is the officer using?
A police officer stops a car for a traffic violation and conducts a legal search of the vehicle after obtaining consent from the driver. the process is known as flipping.
Flipping is a strategy by which law enforcement turns a suspect into an informant to acquire data and make more arrests. In the hypothetical situation, the motorist is offered the option of working with law enforcement to find and apprehend the source of the narcotics or facing substantial criminal charges.
In exchange for their help, drivers who collaborate with the police become their informants and may receive a less sentence or other rewards. While flipping can be a useful tool for law enforcement, there are still doubts regarding its moral implications and the possibility of putting informants in peril or having them give false information.
Read more about traffic violation on:
https://brainly.com/question/28301000
#SPJ4
A court ruled that us dairy farmers can legally use the french name for which variety of cheese?
A court ruled that US dairy farmers can legally use the French name for the variety of cheese Camembert. Camembert cheese is a creamy, soft, surface-ripened cheese that is made from cow's milk.
It is named after Camembert, a town in Normandy, France, where it was first made. Camembert cheese has a strong, earthy aroma and a rich, buttery flavor. It is often enjoyed with crackers, bread, or fruit and pairs well with a variety of wines. In 2018, a US court ruled that US dairy farmers can legally use the French name "Camembert" on their products.
This ruling was controversial because "Camembert" is a protected term under European Union law, which means that only cheese made in the traditional way in Normandy, France, can legally be called "Camembert." However, the court ruled that the term "Camembert" had become generic in the US, and therefore, US dairy farmers should be allowed to use the name on their products.
This ruling means that US dairy farmers can legally use the French name "Camembert" on their products. However, it is important to note that the ruling only applies to the US and does not allow US dairy farmers to export their Camembert cheese to Europe under the name "Camembert." They would still have to comply with EU regulations and call their cheese something else if they wanted to export it to Europe.
Learn more about dairy farmers https://brainly.com/question/30577566
#SPJ11
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
which two statements about retaliation are true ?
Retaliation is a deliberate action designed to send a strong message that complaining is undesirable and dangerous. It's being used to induce fear in those who may contemplate filing a complaint in the future.
Counterproductive behavior in reaction to unequal treatment is generally an attempt to restore justice by getting even with a person or organization and is referred to as revenge.The Spartans opted to retaliate, beginning the First Peloponnesian War.Managers are vulnerable to disciplinary measures if they engage in retaliation.Learn more about the retaliation:
brainly.com/question/12887443
Which is most often a cause for a change in career or lifestyle?
adjustments in vacation
adjustments in life roles
career satisfaction
lifestyle satisfaction
Answer:
B. Adjustment in life roles.
Explanation:
career criminal prosecution program in san diego was characterized
The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing.
How the career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized The career criminal prosecution program in San Diego was characterized by a high conviction rate and mandatory sentencing. This program aimed to put career criminals behind bars for as long as possible. San Diego was considered a pioneer in this approach to prosecution during the 1980s and 1990s, according to criminal justice researchers. The program was seen as a more aggressive approach to fighting crime, especially by repeat offenders. It resulted in fewer trials and more plea bargains due to the threat of mandatory sentencing. This approach aimed to deter criminal behavior by imposing lengthy prison terms.
Learn more about prosecution
https://brainly.com/question/29807782
#SPJ11
What forensic analysis technique allows investigators to determine whether or not a suspect recently fired a weapon and the approximate distance between the shooter and the victim when the gun was fired? a. b. o é o o weapon and ammunition determination firearm/ammunition matching gunshot residue detection and analysis crime scene and event reconstuction 7 d.
Gunshot Residue Test
This test gives the forensic analysists the ability to determine several things. For example, this test does allow them to see if the suspect fired a weapon, was close to a weapon that was fired, and looking at the test results to see the distance from muzzle to target.
I hope this helps! :)
Criminal justice essay
Begin with you pretending to be the President of the American Society of Criminology, a famous scholar with a major theory of your own right, delivering the annual Presidential keynote address. (You may want to look up in a research journal, like Criminology, what a Presidential Annual Address looks like) A certain amount of graded discussion will take place over this assignment along with further tips and hints, but here are general guidelines:
a) Use your own name, not one of a known criminologist, and use your own voice
b) Assume a fictitious theory of your own that is popular but need only be referenced vaguely as a point of reference; i.e., you do not have to spell out what your theory is for this assignment
c) Persuasively and definitively chart the course of the field, while naming names, major ideas (such as at least 10 or so concepts), perspectives, approaches, etc.
d) Be extremely more definitive about disciplinary and interdisciplinary issues such as whether psychology or sociology should more heavily chart the field, and why
e) Remind the audience of any enduring debates that can be resolved or cannot be
f) Delineate the contours of the field, what it should intellectually be more involved in
Answer:
I think you should go with A
Explanation:
For the simple fact that you are the one saying it and not someone else and it comes from your state of mind and not someone else's
Do you think evolution should be taught in public schools?
in 2020
why/why not?
Answer:
Most Public (Govt) Schools indoctrinate students in the religion of atheism, moral relativism, falsely teach evolution as science, & breed intolerance against Christians. Most kids in public schools are not taught how to think for themselves.
Explanation:
Determine if the statement is true or false
Victims of domestic violence face an especially high risk of witness intimidation
O True or False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
this question answer is true
Describe three factors that comtributes to financial crime
Financial Incentives, Weak Regulatory Frameworks and Technological Advancements are three factors that comtributes to financial crime.
Three factors that contribute to financial crime are:
Financial Incentives: The potential for financial gain is a significant motivating factor for individuals or organized groups to engage in financial crimes. This can include activities such as fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or insider trading. The allure of illicit profits, whether through theft, manipulation, or illegal transactions, entices individuals to engage in unlawful activities.
Weak Regulatory Frameworks: Inadequate or weak regulatory frameworks create loopholes and opportunities for financial crime. Insufficient oversight, lax enforcement, and gaps in legislation can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system. This includes inadequate know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, insufficient monitoring of transactions, and limited regulatory supervision, which can facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit financial activities.
Technological Advancements: While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits to the financial industry, they have also opened new avenues for financial crime. The rapid growth of digital transactions, online banking, and cryptocurrencies has created opportunities for cybercrime, identity theft, and hacking. Criminals leverage technology to carry out sophisticated fraud schemes, phishing attacks, and data breaches, exploiting vulnerabilities in systems and networks.
These factors highlight the importance of robust regulations, effective enforcement mechanisms, and technological safeguards to combat financial crime. It requires a comprehensive approach involving collaboration between financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with financial crime and protect the integrity of the financial system.
To know more about Financial crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/31388410
#SPJ11
Paying taxes, voting, jury duty and obeying the laws are all examples of-
Personal Responsibilities
O Government Responsibilities
O Civic Responsibilities
O Mandatory Responsibilities
Answer:
Civic Responsibilities
Explanation:
A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.
Answer:
Civic Responsibility
Explanation:
How soon after the conviction for driving while intoxicated by alcohol or drugs shall it be reported to the FAA and to which division should this be reported to?
Answer:
Within 60 days to the civil aviation security division
Explanation:
You have to report to the security and hazardous materials safety office which is under the civil aviation security division. Anybody that is holding any certificates under part 61 has to give a written report of every motor vehicle action that has to do with alcohol or drug-related, to the security personnel's in faa no later than 60 days after this action was done.
URGENT 40 POINTS
The state prosecutor has decided to dismiss a case for lack of sufficient evidence. She was not able to get witnesses to participate in the proceedings. That, combined with lack of physical proof, meant she couldn’t prove the suspect was guilty in court. Which case label would be added to the file?
A.
Case in pretrial motion
B.
Case defaulted
C.
Case dismissed
D.
Case plea-bargained