1. How does this portion of the Navigation Acts limit trade?

The actions and words of Roman leaders suggest that they had mixed opinions of Caesar. Some leaders were supportive of him and saw him as a capable and strong leader who could help Rome grow and prosper.

Others were wary of Caesar's growing power and influence, and feared that he might become a threat to the stability of the Republic. Some even plotted against him and ultimately led to his assassination.

Overall, the opinions of Roman leaders about Caesar were divided and varied depending on the individual's perspective and agenda.

Answer:

His assassination led to an outpouring of anger among Black Americans, as well as a period of national mourning that helped speed the way for an equal housing bill that would be the last significant legislative achievement of the civil rights era his death made people stand up

Explanation:

just read some books

Answer:

noun

an outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than divine or supernatural matters. Humanist beliefs stress the potential value and goodness of human beings, emphasize common human needs, and seek solely rational ways of solving human problems.

a Renaissance cultural movement which turned away from medieval scholasticism and revived interest in ancient Greek and Roman thought.

noun: Humanism

(among some contemporary writers) a system of thought criticized as being centered on the notion of the rational, autonomous self and ignoring the unintegrated and conditioned nature of the individual

Explanation:

enough sentences

Answer:

I know its not B OR C. but I think it's D.

Explanation:

When US troops fought Field Marshall Rommel’s Afrika Korps in the Battle of Kasserine Pass is US forces were forced to retreat by German troops.The correct answer is option C.

In the Battle of Kasserine Pass, which took place in February 1943 during World War II, the US troops faced the formidable Afrika Korps commanded by Field Marshal Erwin Rommel.

The battle was a significant early engagement between American and German forces in North Africa.

Unfortunately, the initial result of the battle was a defeat for the US forces. The inexperienced American troops, lacking adequate training and coordination, encountered fierce resistance from the well-trained and battle-hardened German troops.

The Afrika Korps, under Rommel's command, successfully exploited weaknesses in the American lines and employed effective armored tactics.

The US forces were caught off guard and suffered heavy losses. The lack of effective communication and coordination among the American units further compounded the situation.

Ultimately, the American troops were forced to retreat, conceding the battle to the German forces.

However, the Battle of Kasserine Pass served as a valuable learning experience for the US military. It highlighted the need for improved training, better leadership, and increased coordination.

Subsequent engagements in North Africa and beyond saw the American forces adapt and refine their strategies, eventually leading to the successful defeat of the Axis powers in the region.

The lessons learned from this defeat played a crucial role in shaping the future success of the US military in World War II.

For more such questions troops,click on

https://brainly.com/question/1050942

#SPJ8

The main  difference in disease trends from 1900's to today is the availability of better healthcare systems and how diseases have evolved due to various factors related to the environment.

What is Healthcare system?

All organisations, institutions, and resources (components) dedicated to generating health actions are together referred to as a health system. A health system's fundamental objective is to safeguard and enhance peoples' health, hence it is focused on peoples' health.

Therefore, many factors ranging from pollution, availability of healthcare systems has affected the disease trends from 1900s to today.

To learn more about Healthcare system, click

https://brainly.com/question/27741709

#SPJ4

In its critique of modernization, modern world systems analysis argues that the source of raw materials today is peripheral nations, the same as it was during the height of colonial expansion.

According to modern world systems analysis, which is a theoretical framework developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, the global capitalist system perpetuates an economic hierarchy where certain core nations dominate and exploit peripheral nations for their resources. These peripheral nations, often located in the Global South, continue to serve as suppliers of raw materials to the more industrialized core nations in the Global North.

This analysis suggests that despite the passage of time and changes in political systems, the dynamics of resource extraction and exploitation have persisted, maintaining a similar pattern to that observed during the era of colonial expansion.

To learn more about Colonial Expansion, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2224184

#SPJ11

In its critique of modernization, modern world systems analysis argues that the source of raw materials today is peripheral nations, the same as it was during the height of colonial expansion.

According to modern world systems analysis, which is a theoretical framework developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, the global capitalist system perpetuates an economic hierarchy where certain core nations dominate and exploit peripheral nations for their resources. These peripheral nations, often located in the Global South, continue to serve as suppliers of raw materials to the more industrialized core nations in the Global North.

This analysis suggests that despite the passage of time and changes in political systems, the dynamics of resource extraction and exploitation have persisted, maintaining a similar pattern to that observed during the era of colonial expansion.

To learn more about Colonial Expansion, click here:

brainly.com/question/2224184

#SPJ11

Answer:

1. Women took on new roles in the work force, notably in war production and agriculture.

2. In 1914, the German armaments producer Krupp employed almost no women.

3. By 1917, women made up nearly 30 percent of its 175,000 workers and a nationwide total of nearly 1.4 million German women were employed in the war labor force.

Explanation:

Answer:

they where only useful for cooking, cleaning, and they brung men supplies for war.

Explanation:

Answer:

mark me brainlies

Explanation:

Britain u the success of his foreign policy plans

The Immigrant that committed more than 50 years of her life to unionizing workers was Mary Harris.

Mary G. Harris Jones, better known as Mother Jones after 1897, was an Irish-born American educator and seamstress who rose to prominence as a union organizer, community organizer, and activist. She assisted in the coordination of significant strikes and was a co-founder of the Industrial Workers of the World.

During the first two decades of the twentieth century, Mary Harris "Mother" Jones rose to fame as a fiery orator and fierce organizer for the Mine Workers. Her voice carried a lot of weight. Her zeal and enthusiasm galvanized men half her age and persuaded their spouses and daughters to join the fight.

Learn more about Mary Harris:
https://brainly.com/question/6560133
#SPJ1

Answer:

large tribes of many families

Explanation:

The USMCA agreement is the Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada is a free trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

The acronym for USMCA is United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Three nations, including Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America, signed this, which became effective on July 1, 2020.

This USMCA brought about a new trade that helped the company for a long time and restrained growth. This agreement also improved the small- and medium-sized business's efficiency and transparency. The virtual presence of offices for export enterprises is where it works best.

This USMCA updated the new regulations and kept the conflict between the three nations due to the removal of free trade tariffs and the import of less expensive goods into the US. Due to the USMCA's threat to undermine Mexico's immigration laws, US exporters have not been guaranteed access to the market.

To learn more about the USMCA trade agreement,

brainly.com/question/29557257

#SPJ4

Citizenship in both Athens and Rome had its merits, but overall, Rome had a more inclusive and effective system. Athens was a direct democracy, with citizens participating in decision-making, but it was limited to male citizens only, excluding women, slaves, and foreigners. Rome, on the other hand, had a representative democracy, allowing a broader range of citizens, including women and freed slaves, to participate indirectly through elected officials. Furthermore, Roman citizenship granted certain rights and privileges, such as legal protection and the ability to own property. Thus, Rome's system was generally better due to its wider inclusivity and more comprehensive rights.

It's difficult to give a comprehensive answer to the question of which city-state had a better system of citizenship, Athens or Rome. However, there are some key differences between the two systems that can be discussed briefly.
Athens' democracy allowed only free adult male citizens to participate in the political process, while Rome allowed citizenship to be granted to non-Roman citizens. Athens' citizenship was tied to birthright, while Rome allowed citizenship to be earned through military service or by purchasing it.
Ultimately, both city-states had their strengths and weaknesses in terms of citizenship. Athens' direct democracy gave citizens more direct involvement in government, but also excluded many individuals from the political process. Rome's flexible system allowed for greater diversity in its citizenry, but also had limitations on who could hold political power. It's difficult to say definitively which system was better, as it largely depends on one's own values and priorities.
To know more about Athens and Rome visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19220831

#SPJ11

The US government included a prohibition on slavery in the treaties with Native Americans in Washington Territory as part of their efforts to assert control over the territory and establish their authority. The government recognized that slavery was a morally reprehensible institution, and they sought to prevent its spread into the new territories.

Additionally, many Native American tribes had already been negatively impacted by European colonization and the forced removal from their ancestral lands, so the government sought to protect them from further exploitation and subjugation. By prohibiting slavery in the treaties, the government hoped to establish a more equitable relationship with the Native American tribes and avoid the conflicts that had arisen in other parts of the country due to slavery.
Hi! I'd be happy to help answer your question: Why did the US government include a prohibition on slavery in the treaties with Native Americans in Washington Territory?

The US government included a prohibition on slavery in the treaties with Native Americans in Washington Territory for several reasons: To promote a unified national policy: By prohibiting slavery in these treaties, the US government aimed to create a consistent policy against slavery in the newly acquired territories. To prevent the expansion of slavery: The US government wanted to prevent the spread of slavery into the Washington Territory, as the issue of slavery had already caused significant tension between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States.
To protect the rights of Native Americans

To know more about Native Americans visit :

https://brainly.com/question/8678061

#SPJ11

Answer:

The meaning of “self-evident truths.” Thomas Jefferson was the principal author of the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration states, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…."

I hope this helps.

The sikh empire of Ranjit singh known for its tolerance of muslims, despite a history of oppression by muslim rulers was because of Sikh tenets of social equality.

The Sikh Empire was a state originating in the Indian subcontinent, formed under the leadership of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, who established an empire based in the Punjab. The empire existed from 1799, when Maharaja Ranjit Singh captured Lahore, to 1849, when it was defeated and conquered in the Second Anglo-Sikh War.

Ranjit Singh, popularly known as Sher-e-Punjab or Lion of Punjab was the first Maharaja of the Sikh Empire, which ruled the northwest Indian subcontinent in the early half of the 19th century. He survived smallpox in infancy but lost sight in his left eye. He fought his first battle alongside his father at age 10.

After the death of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, the empire was weakened by east India British company stoking internal divisions and political mismanagement.

Learn more about Ranjit Singh  click the link here:

https://brainly.com/question/7463669

#SPJ4

Answer:

civics - study of the duties and rights of citizens. citizenship, rights and duties of citizens. government, the ruling authority for a community.

Explanation:

Both the American Presidents, Reagan and Nixon, would disagree regarding the impact of the environmental regulations on the national economy.

Both the American Presidents had similar views regarding the fact that environmental regulations shall be strictly followed even if they negatively impact the national economy.

To preserve the environment, President Nixon as well as Reagan implemented a number of regulations, and made their effects with high priority.

Hence, option C holds true regarding the disagreements of President Reagan and President Nixon.

Learn more about President Reagan and Nixon here:

https://brainly.com/question/11616771

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. How actively should the federal government regulate pollution?

Explanation:

The 1862 Homestead Act provided allotments of land in the Great Plains. Therefore option C is correct.

The 1862 Homestead Act was a significant piece of legislation in the United States that aimed to encourage westward expansion and settlement.

It provided eligible individuals, including farmers, with the opportunity to claim and acquire allotments of public land in the Great Plains region.

These lands were available for agricultural use and were granted to those who met certain requirements, such as improving the land and residing on it for a specified period.

The act played a pivotal role in shaping the development of the Great Plains, as it attracted thousands of settlers seeking land and opportunities in this vast expanse of the country.

Know more about Homestead Act:

https://brainly.com/question/1070631

#SPJ6

Awnser and Explanation:

The telegram was considered perhaps Britain's greatest intelligence coup of World War I and, coupled with American outrage over Germany's resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare, was the tipping point persuading the U.S. to join the war.

Answer:

It helped convince U.S. leaders to send American troops to fight in Europe.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. 2.4 billion

Explanation:

Answer:

2.4 billion

Explanation:

Answer:

You know that you're actually listening to the president, and that they didn’t get a speech writer to write a speech that doesn’t sound like they wrote it.

Explanation:

I had to do this for my history class and this is what I put

Answer: B, prohibited powers

Tobacco, sugar, cotton, precious metals (gold and silver), and other raw products were exported from the Americas to Europe. Fabric and other manufactured commodities were exported to Africa and the Americas.

Alfred Crosby Jr. coined the phrase "Columbian exchange" in 1972 to describe the transfer of species, such as plants, animals, and diseases, from the Old World of Europe and Africa to the New World of the Americas. The exchange began after Christopher Columbus' explorations in 1492 and accelerated subsequently with Europe's colonization of the Americas.

The Americas were cut off from Asia at the end of the last Ice Age, roughly 12,000 years ago. With the exception of intermittent meetings with Vikings in eastern Canada 500 years before Columbus and Polynesian expeditions to the Pacific Ocean shoreline of South America around 1200, there was no regular or major contact with the peoples of the world.

Learn more about the Columbian exchange with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/2206977

#SPJ1

Answer:

I assume you are talking about the Truman Doctrine.

Explanation:

The Truman Doctrine was primarily about the start of the Cold War. It stated that the United States would support any country that was threatened by Soviet Communism.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

because im smart