Case 4.3, Taylor v. Baseball Club of Seattle, L.P., involved a Mariners fan, Delinda Middleton Taylor, who was injured by a baseball that entered the stands during team warm-ups. The issue in the case was a. whether the risk of injury from an errant baseball was foreseeable to a reasonable person with Taylor's familiarity with baseball. b. whether the ball was thrown into the stands intentionally. c. whether Taylor suffered a legally recognizable injury. d. false imprisonment.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Taylor v Baseball club of seattle case was filed by Taylor against Baseball club of Seattle for being negligent. The baseball club in their defence argued that Taylor was quite familiar with the game and the fact that there is a chance that a ball can hit a spectator.
Which television show or movie shows procedures/or a process to collect evidence from a violent crime scene that differs from the actual procedures/process that happen in real life. Then discuss how these two procedures or processes regarding evidence collection portrays the criminal investigation process and how these processes or procedures differ from the actual reality of a crime scene investigation.
* I’m not really. Interested in crime shows so I don’t have a clue
Answer:
Criminal law
Explanation:
Answer:
Mindhunter
America's Most Wanted
Criminal: UK
which of the following actions is not protected under the freedom of expression contained in the first amendment?
Obscenity is never protected under the freedom of expression contained in the first amendment.
Only speech that can be proven to fall into a few specific, limited categories of speech is not covered by the First Amendment. Obscenity, child obscenity, defamatory language, false advertising, genuine threats, and fighting words are examples of unprotected speech.
Obscenity is the name given to a specific subset of obscenity that offends modern social norms and has no redeeming literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Most obscenity, which is sexually suggestive material that appeals to many readers and viewers, is protected by the constitution, at least for adults.
The question is incomplete, complete question will be "Which of the following types of speech is NOT protected by the First Amendment? (check all that apply)
Obscenity, Hate Speech, True Threats, Offensive Speech, Defamation,
False Advertisements"
Learn more about Obscenity at:
brainly.com/question/3861863
#SPJ4
you should hve your battery and charging system check?
Describe the parts of the medieval court system which are still used in our american court system today.
The American legal system still uses a judge and jury, two components of the medieval court system.
The federal and state branches of the American judiciary are set up differently. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the Republic, with input from the Federal Senate and the National Bar Association, rather than elected, which is how they are chosen in most states. The concept of judges has been around since the Middle Ages.
A judge-led jury in the US is also used to present civil and criminal cases to potential jurors. Additionally, since the Middle Ages, this trait has been prevalent.
The judge serves as the law's ultimate arbiter. It is the judge's responsibility to state the law in a positive manner. When it comes to the presentation of evidence by counsel during a trial, the judge acts as an impartial "umpire." Additionally, the judge must decide on admissibility and instruct the jury on how to apply the law. The judge is also responsible for maintaining discipline in the courtroom. On rare occasions, the judge may also serve as the fact-finder if all parties agree. A "bench trial" is what this is. With the Senate's "advice and consent," the President appoints judges to federal courts. The electorate chooses a large number of state court judges.In most trials, the facts are decided by the jury, a group of local citizens. The jury will receive legal instructions from the judge, and in order to reach a verdict, the members will evaluate the facts as they see them in the context of the legal guidelines.Learn more about Jury, here
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ4
state courts of last resort often hear cases . group of answer choices en banc with discretionary jurisdiction en banc with mandatory jurisdiction as a panel with discretionary jurisdiction as a panel with mandatory jurisdiction
State courts of last resort are the highest courts in the state judicial system. They typically have discretionary jurisdiction, meaning they have the power to choose which cases they will hear. These courts can hear cases en banc, which means the entire court will hear the case together.
This is typically reserved for cases that are of significant importance or where there is a conflict in the lower courts.
State courts of last resort may also hear cases as a panel with discretionary or mandatory jurisdiction. In a panel with discretionary jurisdiction, a smaller group of judges will hear the case and decide whether or not to grant further review by the full court. In a panel with mandatory jurisdiction, the case must be heard by a certain number of judges and cannot be dismissed without a full review.
Overall, state courts of last resort play a critical role in the state judicial system, providing the final say in important legal matters. Their ability to hear cases in different formats allows them to efficiently manage their workload while ensuring that justice is served.
To know more about State courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16334264
#SPJ11
if i failed three quarters can i still pass if i do well in the last quarter?
11. Write a short story of a fictitious crime and describe how soil evidence
helped link a suspect to the crime scene or victim.
12. Describe physical characteristics of soil that could heln distinguish
Answer:
Here is the short story:
The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.
Explanation:
The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off. The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.
strict scrutiny places the burden of proof on the government to show that a law in question
A test used by the Supreme Court that places the burden of proof on the government rather than on the challengers to show that the law in question is constitutional.
government . noun. the workout of political authority over the actions, affairs, and so forth, of a political unit, human beings, and so forth, similarly to the general overall performance of certain competencies for this unit or frame; the action of governing; political rule and management. a government is the gadget to govern a country or network.
The Columbia Encyclopedia defines government as "a tool of social manipulate underneath which the right to make legal suggestions, and the proper to put in force them, is vested in a selected institution in society". a government is an institution via which leaders exercising electricity to make and enforce criminal tips. a government's simple abilties are presenting management, retaining order, supplying public services, providing countrywide protection, providing financial security, and offering monetary help.
Learn more about government here: https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
If you were to create a Bill of Rights for the 21st century, what is one new right you would add to the Constitution? Explain why that right would be important to add today.
Answer:
What is the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution. These amendments guarantee essential rights and civil liberties, such as the right to free speech and the right to bear arms, as well as reserving rights to the people and the states.
Explanation:
Perhaps the most famous section of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment. This right is so important, because it protects our rights to speech, press, petition, religion, and assembly. Especially as a young adult just starting to explore my political views the freedom of speech is very significant.
Because the government represents the public and its laws impact us, the Freedom of Information Act was created in 1966. What were the four reason why the act was created and how does the Federal Register further agency transparency?
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was enacted in 1966 in the United States to promote transparency and ensure public access to government information. The act has several purposes, but four key reasons behind its creation are:
Accountability: FOIA was set up to improve administrative responsibility by permitting citizens to ask for and get government records. It points to guarantee that the government remains straightforward and responsible to the open it serves.
Educated Citizenship: FOIA recognizes that an educated citizenry is basic for a working popular government. By giving get to government data, it empowers citizens to be superior educated almost the activities, approaches, and choices made by their government.
Government Oversight: The act encourages government oversight by permitting the open, writers, and organizations to look at and scrutinize government exercises. This straightforwardness makes a difference distinguish and anticipate manhandling of control, debasement, and other shapes of government offense.
Open Cooperation: FOIA energizes open interest within the law-based handle by giving citizens the information they have to be locked in in educated dialogs and talks about things of open intrigue. It permits people and organizations to contribute to approach discourses and decision-making forms.
To learn about Freedom of Information Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/510696
#SPJ4
in civil and criminal cases, the scope is often defined by search warrants or , which specify what data you can recover. a. scope creeps b. risk assessment reports c. subpoenas d. investigation plans
identify the form of federalism that held that a precise separation of national and state authority was both possible and desirable.
Dual Federalism is the belief that a clear separation of federal and state authority is both possible and preferable.
What does the term "dual federalism" mean?Dual federalism, often known as layer-cake federalism or divided sovereignty, is a type of government where the federal and state governments have distinct authorities and the state governments are free to exercise those powers without interference from the federal government.
What are the powers of dual federalism?According to the notion of dual federalism, the federal and state governments both have jurisdiction over people, but that authority is restricted to separate and distinct areas of power, and neither government is subject to nor vulnerable to be stripped of its power by the other.Prime instances of dual federalism are the Senate and the House of Representatives. A federal bill that affects particular states and hence calls for their involvement can be approved by both houses. These matters, however, can only be approved by federal or state representatives.Dual Federalism is the belief that a clear separation of federal and state authority is both possible and preferable.
To know more about Dual Federalism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4691151
#SPJ4
A private club does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin and is not operated as a commercial hotel. What fair housing law does such a club violate by limiting tenancy to its own members
If a private club restricts tenancy to its own members and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin, it would likely violate the Fair Housing Act (FHA) by limiting its membership to exclusive groups.
The Fair Housing Act, enacted in 1968, prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability. It aims to promote fair housing opportunities and eliminate housing practices that perpetuate discrimination and segregation.
While the FHA includes certain exemptions for certain types of housing, such as owner-occupied buildings with four or fewer units and religious organizations operating housing for members of the same religion, private clubs are not exempt from its provisions.
If the private club in question operates as a housing provider and restricts tenancy to its members, it would be considered a violation of the FHA because it discriminates against individuals on the basis of their membership status. By limiting tenancy to club members only, the club effectively excludes individuals who are not part of the exclusive group from accessing housing opportunities.
The FHA's intent is to ensure equal access to housing for all individuals, regardless of their membership status in a private club. By restricting tenancy based on membership, the club creates a barrier that can potentially perpetuate discrimination and limit housing choices for individuals who are not members of the club.
know more about Fair Housing Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/30325123
#SPJ11
Despite the laws and regulations created through the U.S. Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, and substantial scientific capacity and diagnostics to monitor drinking water, the U.S. also faces many challenges in safe drinking water provision. Discuss several of the issues that undermine our ability to guarantee safe drinking water in the U.S. For each issue: (a) offer a short-term assessment of our progress, and (b) describe barriers to improving safe drinking access to the most vulnerable communities.
Challenges to safe drinking water in the US include aging infrastructure, contamination, disparities, compliance issues, and emerging contaminants. Barriers include funding, enforcement, and neglect of vulnerable communities.
Despite regulations and technological advancements, the US ability to provide safe drinking water is threatened by a number of issues. Key issues include deteriorating infrastructure, pollution, access disparities, regulatory and compliance problems, emerging contaminants and climate change.
Due to obstacles like insufficient funding, dispersed responsibility, poor enforcement, economic inequality and a lack of infrastructure, short term progress in solving these problems is constrained. In order to guarantee safe drinking water these issues must be resolved through more funding, stricter enforcement, giving marginalized communities top priority and taking preventative measures for new problems.
Government, communities and other stakeholders must work together to ensure that everyone has equitable access to clean drinking water.
Learn more about safe drinking water at:
brainly.com/question/30128990
#SPJ4
Which part of the First
Amendment says that citizens are allowed to practice
any religion they choose?
A. The separation clause
B. The freedom of association clause
C. The establishment clause
D. The free exercise clause
Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, reading, writing and speaking; the ability to research and understand information quickly and accurately; and be able to handle potentially stressful situations effectively. In no less than 200 words, describe what you consider to be the most important attributes of a successful attorney and explain what actions a person interested in becoming an attorney can take to develop these skills.
Answer:
Passion for the Job. ...
Compassion for Clients. ...
Great Communication Skills. ...
Willingness to Listen. ...
Knowledge of the Law. ...
Strong Writing Ability. ...
Creativity. ...
Good Judgment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Lawyers must have strong oral communication skills and written communication skills to accurately relay critical legal information. As well, a significant portion of a lawyer's job is to create strong and convincing arguments which are presented in the courtroom.
Explanation:
Which of the following is a major predictor of future incarceration?
Childhood trauma
Personal deficiency
Motivation
None of the above
Answer:
It's C, Motivation
mCours
days must register their vehidets).
Question 2:
Select the best answer from the multiple choices below
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than
29
03
13
30
300
were
Posto
mpleted
answered
answered
answered
answered
answered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
unanswered
21 answered
22. Unanswered
23 Unanswered
Suhant Exam for Crossing
Time remaining to complete exam in minutes): 180
wered
Answer:
It's 90 days but u don't have that a optionExplanation:
90 days
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than 90 days must register their vehicles. If you are a new Texas resident, you are allowed to drive with your valid and unexpired licence from another U.S. state, U.S territory or a Canadian province for up to 90 days after moving here.
Answer: I don’t know how to answer this question
Explanation:
there is also no possible question, sorry
The Founders sought to limit governmental power in part by
O Providing for broad implied powers found in the preamble to the Constitution.
Listing certain powers of Congress, and only allowing them to use those powers.
Giving the power of "judicial review" to the Supreme Court.
Listing, or "enumerating," specific powers and listing certain powers denied to Congress.
Enumeration is the idea that by enumerating governmental powers, theConstitution necessarily limits them to what is expressly listed. Enumerations are fond of quoting Chief Justice Marshall’s famous dictum that “presupposes something not enumerated.”
Enumeration means counting or reciting numbers or a numbered listing. A waiter's prolonged enumeration of all available salad dressings may appear a bit antagonistic if he starts with a deep sigh. When you're reciting a listing of things, it is an enumeration. An enumeration is a whole, ordered listing of all items in a collection. The time period is commonly used in arithmetic and laptop technological know-how to list all fixed's elements.
Learn more about Enumeration Here
https://brainly.com/question/13068594
#SPJ1
the same tax law is called the ""death tax"" by republicans and the ""inheritance tax"" by democrats. which phenomenon does this illustrate?
The phenomenon illustrated here is the use of political framing.
The use of different terms to refer to the same tax law, such as "death tax" by Republicans and "inheritance tax" by Democrats, demonstrates the phenomenon of political framing. Political framing is the strategic use of language and terminology to shape public perception and influence attitudes towards specific issues or policies. In this case, both parties are using different names to frame the tax law in a way that aligns with their respective political ideologies and agendas.
By labeling it as the "death tax," Republicans aim to emphasize the negative impact of the tax on individuals and families, suggesting that it is an unfair burden placed on inheritances and estates. This framing appeals to conservative values of limited government intervention and lower taxes. On the other hand, Democrats refer to it as the "inheritance tax" to emphasize the idea of wealth distribution and fairness. This framing aligns with their belief in a progressive tax system that targets the wealthy and redistributes resources to benefit society as a whole.
Political framing plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing policy debates. The choice of language can evoke specific emotions, values, and beliefs, ultimately swaying public support or opposition to a particular issue. It highlights the power of rhetoric and the importance of understanding how political actors use framing techniques to advance their agendas.
Learn more death tax
brainly.com/question/14395021
more people in the united states participate in election campaigns than people in other countries do because _____. multiple choice question. the united states has a unitary form of government people in the united states do not contribute as much money to political campaigns people in the united states have a higher voting turnout for elections the united states has more elected posts than other countries do
More people in the united states participate in election campaign than people in other countries do because the united states has more elected posts than other countries do.
About election campaigns
An coordinated attempt to sway the course of decision-making within a particular group is known as an election campaign. In democracies, political campaigns frequently relate to electoral campaigns, which are used to elect legislators or decide on referendums. The most prominent political campaigns in contemporary politics centre on general elections and contenders for chief of state or head of government, frequently a president or prime minister.
The candidate's ideals for the electorate are contained in the campaign's message. It is to persuade those who share their opinions to support them when they run for office. The message frequently includes a number of talking points about political subjects.
To know more about election campaign:
brainly.com/question/24233984
#SPJ4
What role do executive departments and agencies play in fulfilling the constitutional duties of the executive branch?.
Role of Excutive department and agencies are
They translate the laws passed by Congress into enforceable rules and procedures.Regulates major industries and organizations according to federal law.Manages the day-to-day operations of the federal governmentExecutive branch power is vested in the President of the Country who also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The president is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws written by Congress, and to that end he appoints the heads of federal agencies, including the government. The vice president is also part of the executive branch and is ready to take over the presidency when needed.
The Cabinet and independent federal agencies are responsible for the day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws. These departments and agencies have missions and responsibilities as vastly different as the Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency, the Social Security Administration, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
To learn more about Excutive department, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/15549622
#SPJ4
The Charter grants rights and freedoms from government interference, and
discriminatory actions by individuals and companies.
True or false?
'The Charter grants rights and freedoms from government interference, and discriminatory actions by individuals and companies.
This statement is True.
The definition of government is the exercise of control or power over a group of people. An example of a government is the UK Parliament. (uncountable) Management or control of a system. A system of domination, control, etc.
Political system that governs and regulates enterprises. Different levels of government usually have different responsibilities. The closest level to government is the local government. Municipalities are made up of groups of individual municipalities.
Governments are responsible for making and enforcing social, defense, foreign policy, economic and public service rules. Although the responsibilities of all governments are similar, these duties are carried out differently depending on the form of government.
Learn more about Governments https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ9
Who is usually the first person to bring to the court’s attention a relapse by an offender? i need to know asap!!!
Answer:
hope this helps
Explanation:
Probation Officer
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. What can the accused legally do in this case?.
An individual accused and convicted of a crime believes that the trial court made a mistake applying the law to the case. In this situation this is legally appeal.
In the legal system, an appeal is the procedure by which a matter is examined by a higher authority and the parties ask for a formal revision of a ruling. Appellations serve two purposes: they remedy mistakes and they clarify and interpret the law.
Despite the fact that appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law nations did not codify an affirmative right to appeal into their legal systems until the 19th century. The idea of a right to appeal is a relatively new concept in common law jurisdictions, despite some scholars' claims that it "is itself a substantive liberty interest." Observers have also noted that common law regimes were notably "slow to integrate a right to appeal into either its civil or criminal.
To know more about Appeal in law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14992025
#SPJ4
producer with a comparative advantage has the ability to produce a good or service at
a lower opportunity cost than any competitor can.
a faster rate than any competitor can.
a greater volume than any competitor can.
a lower cost than any competitor can.
Option (a), The ability of an economy to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts is known as comparative advantage.
Comparative advantage: what is it?It is argued that a country has a comparative advantage when it is able to produce goods and services for much less money than other countries. False. It is argued that a country has a comparative advantage when it can produce goods with lower opportunity costs than other countries. Lower costs are a great illustration of an absolute advantage.
Can a producer with a competitive edge offer a product or service?When a producer can offer a good or service for just a lower opportunity cost, the producer does have a comparative advantage in creating that good or service. An absolute production advantage is when you can manufacture a good using less resources than another individual.
Learn more about opportunity cost: https://brainly.com/question/13036997
#SPJ1
Answer:
A - a lower opportunity cost than any competitor can.
Explanation:
EDGE
1. Define actus reus and mens rea.
2. Why are these elements important to the
criminal justice system?
Answer:
1.
Most crimes consist of two broad elements: men's rea and actus reus. Men's rea means to have "a guilty mind." The rationale behind the rule is that it is wrong for society to punish those who innocently cause harm. Actus reus literally means "guilty act," and generally refers to an overt act in furtherance of a crime.
2.
The overall purpose of the criminal justice system - to prevent crime and create peaceful, law-abiding societies - is best served through restorative rather than retributive / punitive justice approaches
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court for the first time explicitly adopted the doctrine against prior restraint as constitutional law.
The theory against prior restriction was explicitly adopted as constitutional law by the Supreme Court in a significant case, making it the first time in legal history.
The Supreme Court's adoption of the theory against prior restraint as constitutional law in the relevant case set a significant legal standard in US history. Instead of punishing the speaker after the fact, prior restraint refers to government efforts to suppress or prevent speech before it is voiced.
With the Court's decision in this case, the doctrine was for the first time expressly acknowledged and applied as a key component of free expression. The protection of free speech in the US has been significantly impacted by this ruling, which also served as the basis for numerous later court conflicts involving free speech and censorship.
Learn more about Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
The correct question will be: What did the Supreme Court adopt the theory against prior restraint?
abby gets a state court civil judgment against casey, but casey does not pay. which of the following is one of the tools available to abby to enforce the judgment against casey?
Writ of Execution is is one of the tools available to Abby to enforce the judgment against Casey.
A writ of execution is a court order that authorises law enforcement officials to start transferring property as the result of a legal decision. It makes a judgement of possession effective. Assets, cash, and real estate are all examples of property. An official document issued by a court that establishes ownership rights is known as a judgement of possession. The judge may then issue a writ of execution to start the property transfer when the court issues a judgement of possession. The writ of execution actually starts the transfer procedure from a judgement debtor to a plaintiff; the judgement for possession just declares the plaintiff has a claim to the property.
Learn more about writ of execution here:
https://brainly.com/question/15836478
#SPJ4