20 POINTS!
(Also explain the reasoning you used to find the expression)
ILL MARK BRAINLIEST

Solving a quadratic equation we can see that it will take 9.97 seconds

The object will be in the ground when the height equation is equal to zero.

Then we will get.

s(t) = -4.9t² + 39.2t + 42.3

We need to find the zeros:

0 =  -4.9t² + 39.2t + 42.3

Using the quadratic formula we will get:

\(t = \frac{-39.2 \pm \sqrt{39.2^2 - 4*42.3*-4.9} }{2*-4.9} \\\\t = \frac{-39.2 \pm48.6 }{-8.8}\)

We only care for the positive solution, which is:

y = (-39.2 - 48.6)/-8.8 = 9.97

It will take 9.97 seconds to hit the ground.

Learn more about quadratic equations:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Hello !

Answer:

\(\boxed{\sf C\approx62.8 ft}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the circumference of a circle with its radius, we will apply the following formula:

\(\sf C=2\pi r\)

Where r is the radius of the circle.

Given :

We know that the diameter is equal to two times the radius, so \(r=10\) ft.

Let's substitute our value into the formula :

\(\sf C=2\times \pi\times 10\\\boxed{\sf C\approx62.8 ft}\)

Have a nice day !

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that

So,

→ R = 20/2

→ R = 10

Now,

We know that,

Circumference of circle = 2πr

→ 2 × 22/7 × 10

→ 440/7

→ 62.8 ft

Hence ,

Answer:

the coefficient of x^2 is 16

Step-by-step explanation:

is the number in front of the variable and exponent

Probability of receiving a hand with exactly three suits \(= (4 * (13^3)) / 2,598,960\)

What is Combinatorics?

Combinatorics is a branch of mathematics that deals with counting, arranging, and organizing objects or elements. It involves the study of combinations, permutations, and other related concepts. Combinatorics is used to solve problems related to counting the number of possible outcomes or arrangements in various scenarios, such as selecting items from a set, arranging objects in a specific order, or forming groups with specific properties. It has applications in various fields, including probability, statistics, computer science, and optimization.

To calculate the probability of receiving a hand with exactly three suits when dealt 5 cards from a well-shuffled deck of cards, we can use combinatorial principles.

There are a total of 4 suits in a standard deck of cards: hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades. We need to calculate the probability of having exactly three of these suits in a 5-card hand.

First, let's calculate the number of favorable outcomes, which is the number of ways to choose 3 out of 4 suits and then select one card from each of these suits.

Number of ways to choose 3 suits out of 4: C(4, 3) = 4

Number of ways to choose 1 card from each of the 3 suits\(: C(13, 1) * C(13, 1) * C(13, 1) = 13^3\)

Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes is \(4 * (13^3).\)

Next, let's calculate the number of possible outcomes, which is the total number of 5-card hands that can be dealt from the deck of 52 cards:

Number of possible outcomes: C(52, 5) = 52! / (5! * (52-5)!) = 2,598,960

Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the number of possible outcomes:

Probability of receiving a hand with exactly three suits =\((4 * (13^3)) / 2,598,960\)

This value can be simplified and expressed as a decimal or a percentage depending on the desired format.

To know more about Combinatorics visit:;

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ4

Answer:

So even though it'll be a little strange, you do just take the miles and divide by the hours.  Since 1 1/3 is the same as 4/3 then the rate = (4/3)/(1/4).  

That's the same as 4/3 * 4 = 16/3 miles per hour.  Or 5 1/3 miles per hour.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6x² – 10y² + 2xy + 10

Step-by-step explanation:

We'll begin calculating the sum of

x² + 3y² – 6xy and 2x² – y² + 8xy + 8

This can be obtained as follow:

... x² + 3y² – 6xy

+ 2x² – y² + 8xy + 8

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

3x² – 2y² + 2xy + 8

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Next, we shall determine the sum of:

–3x² + 4y² + 3 and 4y² – 5

This can be obtained as follow:

–3x² + 4y² + 3

+ 4y² – 5

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

–3x² + 8y² – 2

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Finally, we shall subtract the sum of:

–3x² + 4y² + 3 and 4y² – 5

from the sum of:

x² + 3y² – 6xy and 2x² – y² + 8xy + 8

This can be obtained as follow:

.. 3x² – 2y² + 2xy + 8

– (–3x² + 8y² – 2)

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

6x² – 10y² + 2xy + 10

¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B. \(\frac{x^2}{3^2} +\frac{y^3}{2^2} =1\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

120/100

Step-by-step explanation:

120÷20= 6

100÷20=5

6/5 = 1⅕

The rationale underlying the use of projective personality tests, such as the Rorschach test and the thematic apperception test, is that they reveal the subjects' personalities by eliciting responses to vague, ambiguous stimuli.

The rationale underlying the use of projective personality tests, such as the Rorschach test and the Thematic Apperception Test, is that they can reveal a person's unconscious thoughts, feelings, and motivations. These tests use vague and ambiguous stimuli, such as inkblots or pictures, and ask the person to describe what they see or make up a story about the stimuli. The person's responses are believed to reflect their underlying personality traits and psychological conflicts.

The theory is that when faced with ambiguous stimuli, people project their own thoughts, feelings, and motivations onto the stimuli, revealing their unconscious processes.

Learn More about the Rorschach test here:

https://brainly.com/question/10379868

#SPJ4

An arithmetic sequence can be expressed as explicitly or recursively

The explicit formula of the sequence is \(a_n = 11 - 4n\)

The recursive formula is given as:

\(a_n = a_{n -1} - 4\)

\(a_1 = 7\)

Substitute 2 for n in \(a_n = a_{n -1} - 4\)

\(a_2 =a_1 - 4\)

This gives

\(a_2 =7 - 4\)

\(a_2 =3\)

Calculate the common difference (d)

\(d = a_2 -a_1\)

\(d = 3- 7\)

\(d = -4\)

The explicit formula is then calculated as:

\(a_n = a_1 + (n - 1)d\)

This gives

\(a_n = 7+ (n - 1)*-4\)

Expand

\(a_n = 7+4 - 4n\)

\(a_n = 11 - 4n\)

Hence, the explicit formula of the sequence is \(a_n = 11 - 4n\)

Read more about arithmetic sequence at:

https://brainly.com/question/6561461

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

h(4)=2w+3

4=2w+3

Collect like terms (c. I. T)

4-3=2w

1=2w

Divide both sides by 2(d.b.s)

1/2=2w/2

0.5=w

h=0.5w

the price per cup of paint is $1.66.we can get answer by just using proportion logic

what is proportion?

Proportion refers to the relationship or comparison between two or more quantities or measures. It is often expressed as a ratio or a fraction, where the numerator represents the quantity of interest and the denominator represents the total or reference quantity.

In the given question,

Since 1 quart is equal to 4 cups, 3 quarts is equal to 12 cups.

To find the price per cup, we can divide the total cost by the number of cups:

$19.92 ÷ 12 cups = $1.66 per cup

Therefore, the price per cup of paint is $1.66.

To know more about proportion , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30657439

#SPJ1

Answer:

B it will have to be 7 to make this true

Step-by-step explanation:

The angles in a triangle are less than 90 degrees, the triangle is acute, greater than 90 degrees, the triangle is obtuse, and exactly 90 degrees, the triangle is a right triangle.

What is the converse of the Pythagorean theorem?

The converse of the Pythagorean theorem states that if the square of the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides, then the triangle is a right triangle.

To determine if a triangle is acute, obtuse, or right, we can use the following:

If all the angles in a triangle are less than 90 degrees, the triangle is acute.

If one angle in a triangle is greater than 90 degrees, the triangle is obtuse.

If one angle in a triangle is exactly 90 degrees, the triangle is a right triangle, using the converse of the Pythagorean theorem, c² = a² + b².

Hence, the angles in a triangle are less than 90 degrees, the triangle is acute, greater than 90 degrees, the triangle is obtuse, and exactly 90 degrees, the triangle is a right triangle.

To learn more about the converse of the Pythagorean theorem visit,

https://brainly.com/question/15227724

#SPJ4

The value οf x is 3

A variety οf issues are resοlved by algebraic calculatiοns that treat variables like explicit integers in a single cοmputatiοn. The quadratic fοrmula, fοr instance, can be used tο sοlve any quadratic equatiοn by exchanging the variables in the quadratic fοrmula fοr the numerical values οf the cοefficients in the equatiοn.

A variable in mathematical lοgic is either a symbοl fοr an undefined term οf the theοry (a meta-variable), οr it is a fundamental οbject οf the theοry that is changed withοut cοnsidering any pοtential intuitive meaning.

Given

8x+17 = 41

Sοlving fοr variable 'x'

Add '-17' tο each side.

17 + -17 + 8x = 41 + -17

Or, 8x=24

Divide each side by '8'

Or, x=3

To learn more about variable from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/28248724

#SPJ1

The Maclaurin series for f(x) converges absolutely for x within the interval (-2/3, 2/3).

To find the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = (3cos(x))ln(1+x), we can use the standard formulas for the Maclaurin series expansion of elementary functions.

First, let's find the derivatives of f(x) up to the third order:

f(x) = (3cos(x))ln(1+x)

f'(x) = -3sin(x)ln(1+x) + (3cos(x))/(1+x)

f''(x) = -3cos(x)ln(1+x) - (6sin(x))/(1+x) + (3sin(x))/(1+x)² - (3cos(x))/(1+x)²

f'''(x) = 3sin(x)ln(1+x) - (9cos(x))/(1+x) + (18sin(x))/(1+x)² - (12sin(x))/(1+x)³ + (12cos(x))/(1+x)² - (3cos(x))/(1+x)³

Next, we evaluate these derivatives at x = 0 to find the coefficients of the Maclaurin series:

f(0) = (3cos(0))ln(1+0) = 0

f'(0) = -3sin(0)ln(1+0) + (3cos(0))/(1+0) = 3

f''(0) = -3cos(0)ln(1+0) - (6sin(0))/(1+0) + (3sin(0))/(1+0)² - (3cos(0))/(1+0)² = -3

f'''(0) = 3sin(0)ln(1+0) - (9cos(0))/(1+0) + (18sin(0))/(1+0)² - (12sin(0))/(1+0)³ + (12cos(0))/(1+0)² - (3cos(0))/(1+0)³ = -9

Now we can write the first three nonzero terms of the Maclaurin series:

f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + (f''(0)/2!)x² + (f'''(0)/3!)x³ + ...

f(x) = 0 + 3x - (3/2)x² - (9/6)x³ + ...

Simplifying, we have:

f(x) = 3x - (3/2)x² - (3/2)x³ + ...

To determine the values of x for which the series converges absolutely, we need to find the interval of convergence. In this case, we can use the ratio test:

Let aₙ be the nth term of the series.

|r| = lim(n->infinity) |a_(n+1)/aₙ|

= lim(n->infinity) |(3/2)(xⁿ+1)/(xⁿ)|

= lim(n->infinity) |(3/2)x|

For the series to converge absolutely, we need |r| < 1:

|(3/2)x| < 1

|x| < 2/3

To know more about Maclaurin series:

https://brainly.com/question/31745715

#SPJ4

The value of a that satisfies the given conditions, where f(x) = x³ + ax² + 2a²x + a has a point of inflection at x = 2, is a = -6.

To find the value of a given that the function f(x) = x³ + ax² + 2a²x + a has a point of inflection at x = 2, we need to consider the concavity of the function.

The point of inflection occurs where the concavity changes. In other words, it is where the second derivative changes sign. Let's differentiate the function f(x) to find its second derivative:

f(x) = x³ + ax² + 2a²x + a

f'(x) = 3x² + 2ax + 2a²

f''(x) = 6x + 2a

Now, let's find the second derivative evaluated at x = 2:

f''(2) = 6(2) + 2a

      = 12 + 2a

Since we know that the function f(x) has a point of inflection at x = 2, the second derivative f''(x) must be equal to zero at x = 2. Therefore, we have:

f''(2) = 12 + 2a = 0

Solving this equation for a:

12 + 2a = 0

2a = -12

a = -6

So, the value of a that satisfies the given conditions, where f(x) = x³ + ax² + 2a²x + a has a point of inflection at x = 2, is a = -6.

Visit here to learn more about point of inflection brainly.com/question/30767426

#SPJ11

The product of (3 - √5)(7 - √5) simplifies to 26 - 10√5.

To multiply and simplify the expression (3 - √5)(7 - √5), we can use the distributive property of multiplication over addition. Here are the steps:

1. Start by multiplying the first terms in each set of parentheses: 3 * 7 = 21.

2. Then multiply the outer terms: 3 * (-√5) = -3√5.

3. Next, multiply the inner terms: -√5 * 7 = -7√5.

4. Finally, multiply the last terms: -√5 * -√5 = 5.

Now we can combine these terms to simplify the expression:

21 + (-3√5) + (-7√5) + 5

Combine the like terms: 21 + 5 - 3√5 - 7√5

Combine the constants: 21 + 5 = 26.

Combine the radical terms: -3√5 - 7√5 = -10√5.

The final simplified expression is: 26 - 10√5.

for more search question product

https://brainly.com/question/28782029

#SPJ8

Answer:

820 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use the rule of three in this scenario since this is a ratio problem with one unknown. To do this we simply multiply the diagonal values and divide by the final value. We know that there are a total of 3280.84 ft in a single kilometer, therefore...

1 km  ==  3280.84 ft

0.25 == x

(0.25 * 3280.84) / 1 = 820.21

Now we can see that there are 820.21 ft in the 0.25 kilometers. If we round this to the nearest foot we would round down to a total of 820 feet.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This can be broken down into a square and a rectangle.

A=5(5)+(12)(8-5)

A=25+12(3)

A=25+36

A=61 u^2

Answer:

61

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 5 from the 12 ( as 5 is smaller), then multiply 8 x 5. Then multiply the remaining number from 12 (7) by 3. Then add the 2 sums together.

Answer:

15 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a triangle = \(\frac{1}{2}\) * base * height

Base = 10 cm

Height= 3 cm

Area = \(\frac{1}{2}\) * 10cm * 3cm

        = 5cm * 3cm

        = 15cm²

The number of calcium ions in 2.5 g of calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2), we use stoichiometry and Avogadro's number. The calculation yields approximately 2.4 x 10^21 Ca2+ ions.

1. Calculate the molar mass of calcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2):

  - Ca: 3 atoms x atomic mass of Ca = 3 x 40.08 g/mol = 120.24 g/mol

  - P: 2 atoms x atomic mass of P = 2 x 30.97 g/mol = 61.94 g/mol

  - O: 8 atoms x atomic mass of O = 8 x 16.00 g/mol = 128.00 g/mol

  Total molar mass of Ca3(PO4)2 = 120.24 g/mol + 61.94 g/mol + 128.00 g/mol = 310.18 g/mol.

2. Use the molar mass to convert grams to moles:

  Moles of Ca3(PO4)2 = (2.5 g) / (310.18 g/mol) ≈ 0.00806 mol.

3. Determine the stoichiometry of the compound to find the number of moles of calcium ions (Ca2+):

  In Ca3(PO4)2, the ratio of Ca2+ ions to Ca3(PO4)2 is 3:1.

  Moles of Ca2+ ions = (0.00806 mol) x (3/1) = 0.0242 mol.

4. Apply Avogadro's number to calculate the number of calcium ions:

  Number of Ca2+ ions = (0.0242 mol) x (6.022 x 10^23 ions/mol) ≈ 1.46 x 10^22 ions.

However, since Ca3(PO4)2 contains three calcium ions per formula unit, the total number of calcium ions is:

  Total number of Ca2+ ions = (1.46 x 10^22 ions) x 3 = 4.38 x 10^22 ions.

Rounded to the appropriate significant figures, the number of calcium ions in 2.5 g of calcium phosphate is approximately 2.4 x 10^21 Ca2+ ions.

Learn more about atomic mass : brainly.com/question/30678413

#SPJ11

the p-value (0.208) is greater than the significance level (0.01), we fail to reject the null hypothesis

To determine if there is evidence to suggest that the proportion of voters who believe pharmaceutical companies invent diseases to make money is different for Democrats and Republicans, we can perform a hypothesis test. Let p1 be the proportion of Democrats who believe in the conspiracy theory, and p2 be the proportion of Republicans who believe in the conspiracy theory.

Let's set up the hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): p1 - p2 = 0 (There is no difference in the proportions of Democrats and Republicans who believe in the conspiracy theory)

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): p1 - p2 ≠ 0 (There is a difference in the proportions of Democrats and Republicans who believe in the conspiracy theory)

We will use a two-sample proportion test to test these hypotheses. The test statistic for this test is given by:

\(\[ Z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2})}} \]\)

where:

- \(\( \hat{p}_1 \)\) and \(\( \hat{p}_2 \)\) are the sample proportions of Democrats and Republicans who believe in the conspiracy theory, respectively.

- n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes of Democrats and Republicans, respectively.

- \(\( \hat{p} \)\) is the overall proportion of belief in the conspiracy theory, calculated as the total number of believers divided by the total sample size.

The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one calculated from the sample data, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Given the sample data:

Democrats: n₁ = 788 and \(\( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{137}{788} \)\)

Republicans: n₂ = 866 and \(\( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{105}{866} \)\)

Let's calculate the test statistic and the p-value:

Step 1: Calculate \(\( \hat{p} \)\):

Total number of believers = 137 + 105 = 242

Total sample size = 788 + 866 = 1654

\(\( \hat{p} = \frac{242}{1654} \)\)

Step 2: Calculate the test statistic (Z):

\(\[ Z = \frac{\frac{137}{788} - \frac{105}{866}}{\sqrt{\frac{242}{1654} \cdot \left(1 - \frac{242}{1654}\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{788} + \frac{1}{866}\right)}} \]\)

≈ -1.258

Step 3: Calculate the p-value using the standard normal distribution table for a two-tailed test.

To calculate the p-value, we need to find the probability that a standard normal distribution is less than or greater than the absolute value of the test statistic. Since the alternative hypothesis is two-sided (p1 ≠ p2), we will calculate the p-value as twice the probability of the test statistic being greater than the absolute value of the calculated z-value.

Using a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software, we find that the p-value is approximately 0.208.

Conclusion:

Since the p-value (0.208) is greater than the significance level (0.01), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that the proportion of voters who believe pharmaceutical companies invent diseases to make money is different for Democrats and Republicans.

Learn more about test statistic here

https://brainly.com/question/28957899

#SPJ4

The second statement is the inverse statement of the first conditional statement.

If x and y are two propositions, then:

x ⇒ y

Is a conditional statement:

"If x, then y".

The other statement is:

¬x ⇒ ¬y

Where:

¬x means "not x"

So the statement is:

"If not x, then not y".

That would be the inverse statement of the given conditional statement.

If you want to learn more about conditional statements:

https://brainly.com/question/11073037

#SPJ1

Answer:

actual answe is root under 2

Omitting the capital variable in a production function is likely to introduce a positive bias on the coefficient of labor, while omitting a variable measuring the probability of precipitation in an equation for concert attendance is likely to introduce a negative bias on the coefficient of the weekend dummy variable.

(c) In a production function for airplanes, if the capital variable is omitted, it is likely to introduce a positive bias on the coefficient of labor. The reason for this is that capital and labor are typically complementary inputs in production, and by omitting the capital variable, the model fails to account for the influence of capital on production. As a result, the estimated coefficient of labor will be higher than its true value, leading to a positive bias. The size of the bias will depend on the extent to which capital and labor are complements in the production process.

(d) In an equation for daily attendance at outdoor concerts, if the variable measuring the probability of precipitation is omitted, it is likely to introduce a negative bias on the coefficient of the weekend dummy variable. The reason for this is that the probability of precipitation at concert time is likely to affect attendance, and by omitting this variable, the model fails to capture its impact. As a result, the estimated coefficient of the weekend dummy variable will be lower than its true value, leading to a negative bias. The size of the bias will depend on the strength of the relationship between precipitation and attendance, as well as the proportion of concerts that are affected by precipitation.

To know more about variable,

https://brainly.com/question/33695061

#SPJ11

The third outer loop execution (i = 3), the loop compares the third element (12) with the remaining elements in the list (13, 14, 15) for a total of 3 comparisons

Assuming the outer loop is a standard loop that iterates through the list from the first to the second-to-last element, the number of comparisons made during the third outer loop execution (i = 3) would be 3.

During the first outer loop execution (i = 1), the loop compares the first element (10) with the rest of the elements in the list (11, 12, 13, 14, 15) for a total of 5 comparisons.

During the second outer loop execution (i = 2), the loop compares the second element (11) with the remaining elements in the list (12, 13, 14, 15) for a total of 4 comparisons.

During the third outer loop execution (i = 3), the loop compares the third element (12) with the remaining elements in the list (13, 14, 15) for a total of 3 comparisons.

Learn more about loop execution

https://brainly.com/question/25955539

#SPJ4

Assuming you are using a standard bubble sort algorithm, during the third outer loop execution (i = 3), there will be 3 comparisons made.

The given list (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) and the number of comparisons made during the third outer loop execution (i = 3):

In the first outer loop iteration (i = 1), there will be 5 comparisons (comparing elements at positions 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6).

In the second outer loop iteration (i = 2), there will be 4 comparisons (comparing elements at positions 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-5).

In the third outer loop iteration (i = 3), there will be 3 comparisons (comparing elements at positions 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4).

for such more question on comparisons

https://brainly.com/question/904184

#SPJ11