Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark case that determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This case is significant in regards to the Second Amendment because it affirms that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and not just a right that pertains to militias.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Related Questions
How many police zones does Port Orange FL have? Please Help
Answers
Answer:
The Police Department, with 91 sworn officers, three Reserve officers, and 17 non-sworn employees, provides law-enforcement and animal control services throughout its 27 square miles of primarily residential property.
Answer:
The Police Department has 91 police officers
What is the
difference between a
National bank and a
bank chartered by a
state?
Answers
Okay someone, please help if there is a speed limit sign in a school zone that says "15mph 8am-4pm" if it is summer and school isn't in session, do I still go 15? I know this is probably a silly question, but I always get a different answer when I ask..
Answers
Answer:
what is the meaning of question
need help I have a driver Test coming soon
Answers
Answer:
I'm not sure what state you live in, but for Florida, this would be false.
Explanation:
In Florida, it would be 30, not 35.
Protecting the rights and freedoms of anyone facing processing by the criminal justice system is primarily the task of which agency
?
Answers
under which of the following is it hardest to pass legislation
Answers
Under a divided government, it is typically hardest to pass legislation.
Different political parties control various legislative chambers or branches of the government in a polarized system of government. For instance, one party might be in charge of the executive branch while another holds either the majority or the minority in the legislature. This could lead to political impasse and make it difficult to pass legislation.
Increased partisanship and difficulty coming to an agreement can result from the parties divergent priorities, ideologies and agendas. In contrast to a unified government where one party holds majorities in all branches or chambers, compromises and negotiations are frequently required to advance legislation, and the process can be slower and more contentious.
Learn more about legislation at:
brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete, complete question "Under which of the following is it hardest to pass legislation?
Unicameral government
Unitary government
Divided government
Unified government"
what is democratization imply?
Answers
Answer:
Democratization, or democratisation, is the transition to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction.
Which method of resistance was best known for showing the horrors of slavery to Northerners?
publishing of Uncle Tom’s Cabin
the Underground Railroad
slave revolts
Henry Brown exiting the box
Answers
Answer:
publishing of Uncle Tom's Cabin
Explanation:
This book showed to horrors of slavery to the northerners by giving them insight into something they really didn't know much about, they knew that slavery was bad, but they didn't realize it was THIS bad.
The underground railroad just freed slaves, it didn't really show the horrors of slavery to the northerners, same thing with slave revolts. Henry Brown exiting the box was influential to a certain degree, but not nearly as much as Uncle Tom's Cabin was.
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
According to Boatright, what's right, and what's wrong, with stakeholder theory? What is the strongest argument against his claim that all stakeholders are best served when managers focus on profit for shareholders?
Answers
Boatright’s analysis of the stakeholder theory depicts a positive evaluation of the theory, however, there are certain elements of the theory that he considers flawed.
This paper will examine the strengths and weaknesses of Boatright's analysis of the stakeholder theory and why it cannot be fully accepted.
According to Boatright, the stakeholder theory has been effective in business practices, although, it has not been taken seriously in theory. He argues that the theory is not just about corporate social responsibility but also about the management of corporations and the appropriate actions that should be taken to manage corporations and the stakeholders involved. He acknowledges that the stakeholder theory could still be improved by giving more clarity on its key concepts and how it should be incorporated into practice.
Boatright's strongest argument against his claim that all stakeholders are best served when managers focus on profit for shareholders is the impact of social capital. Social capital argues that companies need to be responsive to their surrounding communities to gain trust and better relationships with customers and stakeholders. In this view, profitability is not always the main goal. Social capital helps companies to gain social resources like trust, confidence, and loyalty. Hence, Boatright fails to acknowledge the impact of social capital, which is vital to building long-term sustainability and a positive reputation for companies.
Read more about stakeholder's theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/32536678
#SPJ11
Explain five functions of council of
state
Answers
Answer:
Powers and Functions of the Council of Ministers:
(i) Formulation of Policies:
(ii) Administration and Maintenance of Public Order:
(iii) Appointments:
(iv) Guiding the Legislature:
(v) Control over the State Exchequer:
(vi) Execution of Central Laws and Decisions of the Union Government:
Explanation:
in housing, which of the following federal and state laws deal with illegal discrimination against individuals with disabilities?
a. Americans with Disabilities Act
b. Rehabilitation Act
c. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
d. Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act
e.Civil Service Reform Act
Answers
The Americans with Disabilities Act and related federal and state laws prohibit illegal discrimination against people with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, also known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101), is a civil rights law that prohibits disability discrimination. It provides Americans with disabilities with similar anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1], which made discrimination based on race, religion, gender, national origin, and other characteristics illegal, and later sexual orientation. Furthermore, unlike the Civil Rights Act, the ADA requires covered employers to make reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, as well as imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations. [2] The National Council on Disability recommended the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1986, and the first version of the bill was introduced in the House and Senate in 1987.
To learn more about Americans with Disabilities Act:
https://brainly.com/question/2561827
#SPJ4
A) People with disabilities cannot be subjected to unlawful discrimination, according to the Americans with Disabilities Act and associated federal and state legislation.
The Americans with Disabilities Act is what, exactly?Disability discrimination is illegal under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, generally known as the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12101). It gives people with disabilities the same anti-discrimination protections as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination based on sexual orientation and later, race, religion, gender, and other factors.
The ADA also imposes accessibility requirements on public accommodations, unlike the Civil Rights Act, and compels eligible companies to provide reasonable accommodations for workers with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was initially proposed in the House and Senate in 1987 after being recommended for adoption by the National Council on Disability in 1986.
Learn more about the Americans with Disabilities Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/2561827
#SPJ4
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
Answers
You aspire to be a police officer and are about to graduate with your criminal justice degree. Your best friend has just been hired by a local law enforcement agency, and you are applying there as well. When you were freshmen, you were both caught with marijuana in your dorm room. Although you were arrested, the charges were dismissed because it turned out that the search was illegal. The application form includes a question that asks if you have ever been arrested. Your friend told you that he answered no because he knew this agency did not use polygraphs as part of their hiring process. You must now decide whether to also lie on the form. If you lie, you may be found out eventually, but there is a good chance that the long-ago arrest will never come to light. If you don’t lie, you will be asked to explain the circumstances of the arrest, and your friend will be implicated as well. What should you do?
Make sure you format your answer to include what ethical system you used to formulate your answer.
Answers
If A tells B the truth, B will suffer. Mr. B won't come clean since he thinks it won't affect his career. Here, use "act utilitarianism." According to this idea, an activity is morally praiseworthy if it brings others satisfaction. Mr. A shouldn't disclose the truth since it won't please Mr. B.
This is further explained below.
What explains the circumstances of the arrest, and your friend will be implicated as well. What should you do?Generally, Both Mr. A and Mr. B opted to join the police force. One day, the cops raided their room and found what they believed to be marijuana. When their case went to trial, the judge tossed out the accusations against them. After waiting for a while, they both apply for jobs at the police department. Mr. A is now faced with a difficult moral choice: whether or not to reveal the details of their arrest.
The solution to this moral conundrum seems to be telling the truth throughout the recruiting process, at least according to the norms of ethics and moral considerations. The rule of relativism states that moral ideals are less important than the environment in which they are enacted.
In conclusion, There will be consequences for Mr. B if Mr. A tells the truth to his buddy. Mr. B is unwilling to come clean because he believes it will not have any significant effect on his professional standing. The principle of "act utilitarianism" must be used here. According to this theory, an action is ethically commendable only if it results in a great deal of happiness for other people. So, because telling the truth won't make Mr. B happy, Mr. A shouldn't do it.
Read more about the ethical system
https://brainly.com/question/13300835
#SPJ1
Utilitarian approach O a. accounts for values such as justice and individual rights O b. None of the given statements O c. says with certainty whether the consequences of our actions will be good or bad O d. It is not the most common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of the way in which it accounts for costs and benefits
Answers
The utilitarian approach to moral reasoning focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being by considering the costs and benefits of actions. It weighs the consequences of actions and aims to achieve the greatest net benefit for the greatest number of people.
In business ethics, while the utilitarian approach can be applied, it is not always the most common approach. This is because it may require weighing the costs and benefits of actions in a way that can be challenging or subjective, especially when considering factors such as individual rights, justice, and other moral values.
Other approaches, such as deontological ethics or virtue ethics, may also be employed in business ethics depending on the specific circumstances and values involved.
When a psychologist simply records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a – study. The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable – the other. This is the – problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a – controlling both of the observed variables.
Answers
Answer:
The Correct approach will be "correlational, causes, directionality and third variable".
Explanation:
Correlational studies are little more than an investigation that is sometimes used throughout psychology as either a preparatory method for gathering information about a particular topic and within circumstances where it would not be sufficient to execute a research project.The method described in the previous section usually includes investigates the relationships between two or even more independent variables.Because then the answer is indeed the correct one.
The correlational studiesis a research where the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical relationship between them.
When psychologist records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a correlational study.The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable causes the other and this is the directionally problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a third variable controlling both of the observed variables.Read more about correlational study
brainly.com/question/4272060
Elisa bought 5 bracelets for a total of $25.95. If the bracelets were the same cost, about how much did each bracelet cost? $4.00 $125.00 $5.19 $5.00
Answers
Answer:
they would cost 5.19
Explanation:
5•5=25
.19•5=.95
together they add up to 5.19
Please help? ill give 38 points.
Answers
Answer:
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. Among other things, this law authorizes EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and public welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants. One of the goals of the Act was to set and achieve NAAQS in every state by 1975 in order to address the public health and welfare risks posed by certain widespread air pollutants. The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the state, in order to achieve these standards. The Act was amended in 1977 and 1990 primarily to set new goals (dates) for achieving attainment of NAAQS since many areas of the country had failed to meet the deadlines. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act addresses emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Prior to 1990, CAA established a risk-based program under which only a few standards were developed. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments revised Section 112 to first require the issuance of technology-based standards for major sources and certain area sources. "Major sources" are defined as a stationary source or group of stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year or more of a hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year or more of a combination of hazardous air pollutants. An "area source" is any stationary source that is not a major source. For major sources, Section 112 requires that EPA establish emission standards that require the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of hazardous air pollutants. These emission standards are commonly referred to as "maximum achievable control technology" or "MACT" standards. Eight years after the technology-based MACT standards are issued for a source category, EPA is required to review those standards to determine whether any residual risk exists for that source category and, if necessary, revise the standards to address such risk.
Explanation: im just different
For which of the following crimes does the New Jersey Real Estate Commission have the power to promptly revoke the license of an agent awaiting trial?
A. Larceny
B. Kidnapping
C. Forgery
D. Possession of drugs
Answers
For Forgery does the New Jersey Real Estate Commission have the power to promptly revoke the license of an agent awaiting trial
What is forgery under IPC?Making a false document under the name of a fictional character with the intent that it be believed that the document was created by a real person, or under the name of a deceased person with the intent that it be believed that the document was created by the person while he or she was still alive, may constitute forgery. Anyone found guilty of forgery faces a punishment of either type of jail for a time that may last up to two years, a fine, or a combination of the two. This clause states that anyone found guilty of forgery will be punished with a fine, either type of imprisonment for a time that may last up to two years, or both.To learn more about crimes refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
in john 10 who are the sheep
Answers
Answer:
In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.
In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).
Explain the major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases.
Answers
The major factors that go into how judges make decisions in their cases. are
"direct influences," which include things like legal and political experiences."indirect and distant impacts," which include things like broad legal and political.What is a Judge?Generally, A judge is an individual who presides over the proceedings that take place in a court of law, either on their own or as a member of a panel of judges.
The judge will listen to all of the witnesses as well as any additional evidence that may be provided by the prosecution or the defense. On the basis of the evidence that has been provided as well as in compliance with the law, the judge will make a determination as to whether or not the accused individual is guilty. In the event that the accused is found guilty, the court will subsequently impose the appropriate penalty.
Read more about judge
https://brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ1
Meanings of the following please
a. SWGDRUG
b. SWGDOC
c. SWGTOX
d. SWGCBRN
Answers
Answer:
.
Explanation:
A. Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs
B. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination
C. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology
D. Scientific Working Group for the Forensic Analysis of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism
That’s The girl That keeps posting all of Those link To Their question That’s what I want The phone number for brainly so I can call Them about it
Answers
Explanation:
Yes you are right she even did on mine I complained
What does “Checks and balances” mean when it comes to government. Give at least 2 examples of checks and balances amongst the branches of government.
Answers
Answer:
In terms of gov.t, Checks and Balances, which is the principle of government under which separate branches have the power to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power.
Explanation:
- 1st Example -
> The Judicial branch/Supreme court CHECKS on the Executive branch/President to make sure that the laws that they enforce is (Un)constitutional and would BALANCE the power it enforces.
- 2nd Example -
> The Legislative branch/Congress CHECKS on the Judicial branch/Supreme Court to make sure that they are doing their job on interpreting the laws to make the law (un)constitutional
.. I hope this helps ..
What was the Nuremberg trials and its impact on international law?
Answers
The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials held in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1949 to prosecute Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity and other violations of international law.
The trials were held in the Nuremberg Palace of Justice and conducted by an international tribunal made up of representatives from the Allied powers, including the Soviet Union, the United States, Britain, France and China.
The Nuremberg Trials had a significant impact on the development of international law, particularly in the areas of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The trials established that individuals could be held responsible for their actions, regardless of their official position or rank, and provided a legal framework for the prosecution of those responsible for atrocities.
know more about Nazi officials here
https://brainly.com/question/30057210#
#SPJ11
In what ways might press reports and
news coverage creates problems for the
the criminal justice system and be damaging
to the objective outcome of a criminal
trial?
Answers
The media primarily sets the agenda in two ways: first, by reporting the news, and second, by advising us on how to interpret it.
What significance does news coverage have?
News is that aspect of communication that informs us about the evolving events, problems, and people in the outside world. The main purpose of news is to inform the public, even though it may also be engaging or entertaining.
What effects does news have on people and society?
Positive effect: People can keep up with global events with the help of 24-hour news channels. News organizations support democracy by promoting governmental transparency. Currently, many in positions of authority are terrified of news outlets because they are answering questions from the public on their behalf.
Learn more about news here:
https://brainly.com/question/26027924
#SPJ13
The two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws are the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission. T/F
Answers
The two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws are the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission. (True).
Are the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission the two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws?Step 3: True. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are indeed the two federal agencies charged with enforcing consumer laws. The FTC is responsible for protecting consumers against unfair and deceptive business practices, promoting competition, and ensuring that markets operate efficiently. They enforce a wide range of consumer protection laws and regulations, including those related to advertising, privacy, and fraud. On the other hand, the FCC focuses specifically on telecommunications and media industries, regulating areas such as telemarketing, robocalls, and internet service providers. Both agencies play crucial roles in safeguarding consumer rights and promoting fair practices in the marketplace.
Consumer protection agencies: The FTC and the FCC are key federal agencies in the United States tasked with protecting consumers. They work to ensure fair and competitive markets, protect privacy rights, and enforce laws related to advertising, telecommunications, and media. Their efforts aim to create an environment where consumers can make informed choices, have access to reliable services, and are protected from deceptive or harmful practices. By enforcing consumer laws, these agencies play a vital role in maintaining trust, fairness, and accountability in the marketplace.
Learn more about Trade Commission
brainly.com/question/32240579
#SPJ11
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
If one of the outstanding class-action lawsuits against a Canadian gig employer were to be found in favour of the plaintiffs (i.e. in favour of the gig workers suing their employers), the employer would likely be responsible for paying retroactively for various rights these workers had that were not fulfilled. Briefly describe the types of payments these employers would find themselves owing to their workers.
Answers
The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.
The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.
They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.
To know more about employment , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Gina is a director on the board of Home Furnishings Inc. As a director, she may nota. authorize major corporate policy decisions.b. decide to issue stock and bonds, and declare dividends.c. select and remove corporate officers.d. subordinate the firm's welfare to her personal interests.
Answers
Gina does not subordinate the firm's welfare to her personal interests (d), as her primary responsibility is to act in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders.
As a director on the board of Home Furnishings Inc., Gina has certain responsibilities and limitations. Firstly, she cannot solely authorize major corporate policy decisions; these must be made in conjunction with the other directors and the company's executive team. Additionally, while she may be involved in the decision-making process, she cannot single-handedly decide to issue stock and bonds, declare dividends, or make any financial decisions without the approval of the other directors. Gina also has the power to select and remove corporate officers, but again, this decision must be made in conjunction with the other directors. Finally, as a director, it is essential that Gina always puts the firm's welfare before her personal interests and does not use her position for personal gain. Overall, being a director comes with both power and limitations, and it is crucial for individuals like Gina to uphold their responsibilities and prioritize the best interests of the company.
To know more about stakeholders visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30241824
#SPJ11