a combination of national and international law that deals with rules for ships and shipping; relates to collision at sea, salvage of ships and cargo, claims on vessels and cargo as security in case of breach of contract, liability limitation to value of ships, and marine insurance; based on long-established traditions.T/F
Answers
A combination of national and international law that regulates ships and shipping; it refers to collisions at sea, the salvaging of ships and cargo, making use of ships and cargo as security for debts, limiting liability to the value of ships, marine insurance, and other long-standing customs. is accurate.
In a wide range of areas, including conflict, diplomacy, economic ties, and human rights, it creates normative norms and a shared conceptual framework for states. Academics differentiate between international legal entities based on their responsibilities, specificity, and delegation International custom, treaties, and broad legal concepts that are acknowledged by the majority of state legal systems are among the origins of international law. International comity, or the customs governments establish to sustain friendly ties and mutual recognition, such as saluting the flag of a foreign ship, may also reflect international law, but these customs are not binding under the law.
Learn more about law from
brainly.com/question/23690226
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Can you remember the four (4) traditional rules of statutory interpretation?
Answers
Answer:
There are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are (1) the literal rule, (2) the golden rule, (3) the mischief rule and (4) the purposive approach.
How many kinds of election do
countries operate?
Answers
Answer:
8
Explanation:
By-election.
Corporate.
Direct / Indirect.
Fixed-term.
General.
Local.
Mid-term.
Plurality.
How does the judicial branch examine the actions of administrative agencies?
Answers
Answer:
Federal courts routinely uphold very broad delegations of authority. When reviewing administrative agency actions, courts ask whether the agency afforded those under its jurisdiction due process of law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
Does this help?
If the defendant does not respond in any way, the court may enter an order of _____ and grant the plaintiff the relief sought by the complaint.
Answers
If the defendant does not respond in any way, the court may enter an order of default and grant the plaintiff the relief sought by the complaint.
The Plaintiff may request a default court judgment against Defendants if they fail to appear at the trial. The Plaintiff must still demonstrate to the Jury that there is a reasonable possibility the Defendant was genuinely served with the Statement of Claim in order for the Court to grant the default judgment. According to the Plaintiff's knowledge, the Defendant: (a) is not currently serving in the military; (b) is literate in English; and (c) does not have any physical or mental impairments that would preclude him or her from witnessing the trial or from comprehending the the nature of the case. The Defendant should pay the Plaintiff what is due as a result of the Plaintiff's legitimate claim. If the Defendant requests it and the Claimant does not attend at the trial but the Defendant appears, the Judge may dismiss the matter without prejudice.
Learn more about plaintiff here
https://brainly.com/question/29213966
#SPJ4
Decide whether each
description fits trial courts only, appellate courts
only, or both, and write the letter of the description
in the correct part of the diagram. The first one is
done for you.
A. Hears civil cases
B. Might have a jury trial
C. Does not hear cases for the first time
D. Hears criminal cases
E. Reviews a verdict to look for mistakes
F. Usually has three-judge panels
G. Hears cases for the first time
H. Works with laws
Answers
Essay help- Discuss and resolve the debate, issue, or question of whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit the number of designated classes; e.g., LBTQI etc., or expand them. At what point should the “queering” or “queerness” end? Include in your discussion, how useful the race-class-gender paradigm has been in criminology and its expansion or refinement
Answers
Answer:
The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.
Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.
The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.
In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.
Explanation:
The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology as it has allowed scholars to examine how these three factors intersect to produce different experiences of oppression. However, this paradigm has been criticized for being too narrow and not taking into account the experiences of individuals who do not fit into these three categories. Therefore, it is important to expand the paradigm to include other identities, such as sexual orientation, ability, and nationality.
In terms of limiting or expanding designated classes, I believe that it is important to expand them to include a broader range of identities. By doing so, we can better understand how different forms of oppression intersect and produce different experiences of violence and crime. However, it is also important to recognize that there is a point where the "queering" or "queerness" should end. We should not create so many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand.
In conclusion, intersectional and queer criminology should expand the number of designated classes to include a broader range of identities. However, we should also be mindful of not creating too many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand. The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology, but it is important to expand it to include other identities.
After reading the Dan & Me and the Brene Brown Gun Rights articles, what are your general thoughts? How can you, personally, learn about other people's perspectives (particularly in areas you know you will disagree), and still be open to learning?
Answers
Few strategies that can employ to approach such situations are Approach with an open mind, Active listening and reading, Seek diverse sources, Empathy and perspective-taking, Empathy and perspective-taking, Constructive dialogue, Challenge your assumptions.
Understanding and learning from different perspectives, especially when you anticipate disagreement, is an essential aspect of intellectual growth and fostering empathy. Here are a few strategies you can employ to approach such situations
Maintain an open and curious mindset when encountering viewpoints that differ from your own. Recognize that everyone has unique life experiences and beliefs that shape their perspectives.
Engage in active listening or reading when exploring different perspectives. Take the time to understand the underlying motivations, values, and experiences that inform someone's viewpoint. Seek to comprehend their reasoning rather than immediately dismiss or invalidate their stance.
Make a conscious effort to seek out diverse sources of information, including those that represent viewpoints contrary to your own. Read articles, books, and listen to podcasts or interviews from a range of authors, experts, and individuals who hold different beliefs. This exposure can help you gain a broader understanding of the issue.
Put yourself in the shoes of those who hold opposing viewpoints. Try to understand their emotions, fears, and concerns. This exercise in empathy can foster compassion and provide insight into why people hold particular beliefs.
Engage in respectful and constructive dialogue with individuals who hold different perspectives. Focus on active listening, asking questions, and seeking common ground. While you may not change your beliefs, you can gain a better understanding of others' positions and foster mutual respect.
Be willing to challenge your own assumptions and biases. Reflect on why you hold certain beliefs and consider alternative perspectives that challenge your own. This self-reflection can lead to personal growth and a more nuanced understanding of complex issues.
To know more about strategies here
https://brainly.com/question/28338759
#SPJ4
While driving your vehicle, if you see this traffic sign it means...
Plz help fast
Answers
Answer: You cannot go straight ahead. You must turn left or right.
Explanation:
Due to the arrows pointing both ways you must turn left or right. This will be placed in intersections.
The seller told you that a car was the best car she ever owned and that you will love it; you've had one repair bill after another and hate the car. You can get your money back because the seller committed fraud.
true
false
Answers
Answer:
The answer is false ....
QUESTION 2 Read the following scenarios and identify whether the contract described in each is valid, void or voidable. In each instance, also indicate which factor (potentially) influences consensus: 2.1 John buys two tickets to a movie from Andile. John is under the impression that he is buying the tickets from a woman named "Ayanda". (2) 2.2 Tshidi kidnaps Rabelani's daughter and uses this as leverage to force Rabelani to sell his house to Tshidi at a ridiculously low price. (2) 2.3 Maggie tries to convince Lelo to buy her three-year-old fridge. Maggie lies to Lelo and tells her that the fridge was bought last month and that it was only used for two days. Based on this false information, Lelo buys the fridge from Maggie. (2) [6] 1
Answers
............................
The contracts in scenarios 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are voidable, void, and voidable respectively.
In scenario 2.1, the contract between John and Andile is voidable. The factor that influences consensus is the false impression that John had about the seller. In scenario 2.2, the contract between Tshidi and Rabelani is void because it was entered into under duress. Kidnapping is illegal and therefore renders the contract invalid. In scenario 2.3, the contract between Maggie and Lelo is voidable. The false information provided by Maggie influenced Lelo's decision to buy the fridge.
Learn more about Contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/34698330
#SPJ2
The body of a 22-year-old male murder victim is discovered in his apartment by his landlord. He was found face down on his bed. The name "Joe" is written in blood just above the bed, in the victim's hand writing. A defence lawyer would view this evidence as
Answers
Answer:
A defense attorney would see this evidence as not very accurate, since "Joe" is a very common name and does not point directly to a culprit.
Explanation:
The evidence left by the victim is accurate, since the name "joe" is extremely common and does not point directly to a specific person, in addition, the word "Joe" can be an unfinished word, which makes the evidence even more unspecified and weak, requiring further investigation so that a conclusion can be drawn to the case.
Answer:
Explanation:
orange
Using your z-score table, find P(z < 1.89)
Answers
Pretend you are an African American man living in 1870 in the United States. Describe two ways in which the 14th Amendment might have affected your life. Write in the first person, and create a name for your imaginary person
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
My name is Elijah Washington, and I am an African American man living in the United States in 1870. The 14th Amendment has had a profound and transformative impact on my life, empowering me in ways I never thought possible.
Firstly, the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has shattered the chains of inequality that bound us for far too long. With this revolutionary clause, I now have a legal shield against the insidious discrimination and unequal treatment that plagued our society. It declares that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This powerful language has emboldened me to challenge the systemic injustices that have stifled our progress. Whether facing racial segregation, unequal access to public facilities, or discriminatory employment practices, I can wield the Equal Protection Clause as a sword of justice, demanding fair treatment and equal rights.
Secondly, the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause has bestowed upon me the long-awaited recognition and dignity of being a true American citizen. For generations, African Americans like myself were denied the basic rights and privileges of citizenship. But with the stroke of a pen, the 14th Amendment has finally acknowledged our inherent right to belong. As a citizen, I now possess the unassailable armor of legal protection. I am entitled to due process, ensuring that the wheels of justice shall turn for me as they do for anyone else. I can exercise my newfound political power, actively participating in the democratic process, and working towards dismantling the chains of prejudice and injustice that still linger.
The 14th Amendment has become our collective anthem of freedom, an unwavering testament to the resilience and fortitude of our community. It has emboldened us to march forward, forging a path towards true equality. While I recognize that the battle for justice is far from over, the 14th Amendment has ignited a fire within our hearts, reminding us of the promise and potential that lie within each of us. Through the Equal Protection Clause, we have the power to challenge the darkest corners of prejudice, ensuring that our children and grandchildren will grow up in a world where they are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. Through the Citizenship Clause, we have claimed our rightful place in this nation, ready to reshape its destiny and build a more inclusive society for all. As an African American man in 1870, I stand proud, shoulder to shoulder with my brothers and sisters, knowing that the 14th Amendment is our beacon of hope, guiding us towards a brighter and more just future. Together, we will overcome the challenges that lie ahead, forging a path of equality, freedom, and unparalleled achievement. The 14th Amendment has forever changed the trajectory of our lives, and we will seize this opportunity to reshape our destiny and inspire generations to come.
HELP, WIL MARK BRAINLEST
Answers
The answer should be D-Learners license. From what I can tell, this is the Drivers license course. You don't need a high school diploma, you don't need a private pilots license, and I don't know of an ID card course. The Learners license in Florida must be held for 12 months before you can get your license.
I hope I've helped! :)
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise
Answers
The term for awarding political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is called patronage.
Patronage is the distribution of government positions, contracts, and other benefits to individuals based on their political support rather than their qualifications or merit.
Patronage is the act of giving jobs, contracts, and other benefits to supporters and friends of a political party or individual rather than considering their qualifications or merit. It's a form of corruption that has long been associated with politics.
Patronage is frequently used to reward political allies, supporters, and campaign donors with jobs, contracts, and other perks. As a result, patronage is often viewed as a way to gain and maintain political power, which can lead to inefficiency and waste in government.
awarding of political jobs or contracts based on partisan ties instead of merit or expertise is?
Learn more about political https://brainly.com/question/29979765
#SPJ11
A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
processed the scene for evidence. As they neared the end of processing the crime
scene, another child was abducted in a park, not far away. Some of the evidence
from the two scenes appears similar, but other evidence is different. Police want to
keep the restaurant closed and look for new evidence later if the investigation
suggests they should. Which statement is true?
The police need a search warrant to continue searching the restaurant, according
to Mincey v. Arizona.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Michigan v. Tyler.
The police do not need to get a search warrant, according to Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The statement which is true as per the given scenario is - "The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States". Thus, option first is correct.
What is search warrant?A search warrant is a court order issued by a magistrate or judge authorizing law enforcement authorities to search a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and seize any evidence found. A search warrant cannot be granted in most nations to facilitate civil proceedings.
A youngster was kidnapped from a nearby eatery. The eatery was shuttered as police investigated the area for evidence. Police intend to shut the establishment and search for fresh evidence later if the inquiry leads them to believe they should.
According to the scenario, "The police need to seek a search warrant, pursuant to Frye v. United States," according to the stated circumstances. As a result, option one is correct.
Learn more about the search warrant here:
https://brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ2
A body was discovered in the weight room of a gym. A man had beendoing " arm curls" with heavy weights. The only place rigor was present was in his arms.
Answers
Answer:
what are you asking?
Explanation:
Answer:
The weights crushed him.
Explanation:
I think because he was in a room full of weigths or maybe it was a murder. These are just guesses based on the text since there is not much of a question.
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answers
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
Q. Sometimes you need to turn left on a busy road that shares left-turn lanes with
A.opposing traffic
B.high-speed expressways
C.school zones
D.pedestrians
Answers
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
The two way left-turn lane is the lane that allows vehicle to take left turn. It is also known as the shared left turn lanes. This lane is used by vehicles to make left turns on a busy road to make left turns or U-turns.
The vehicle is not permitted to drive more than 200 feet on this shared lane,as it may cause clashes. The vehicles make left turns on the shared left-turn lanes with the opposing traffic.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Sometimes one need to turn left on a busy road that shares the left-turn lanes with opposing traffic.
A two way left-turn lane is a lane which allows vehicle to take left turnand also known as shared left turn lanes.
The left-turn lane are used by vehicles to make left turns on a busy road to make left turns or U-turns.
However, a vehicle is not permitted to drive more than 200 feet on this shared lane.
Hence, at times, one need to turn left on a busy road that shares the left-turn lanes with opposing traffic.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/4616863
Which best describes the representation role of member of the House of Representatives?
Serving on committees
Meeting with constituents
Voting on bills
Speaking on the house floor
Answers
Answer:
meeting with constituents.
The primary duty of a member of the house of representatives is to meet with constituents.
What is the legislature?The legislature is the arm of government that is saddled with the responsibility of making laws. In a bicameral legislature, there are two chambers;
Upper chamberLower chamberHouse of RepresentativesThe lower chamber is the house of representatives. The primary duty of a member of the house of representatives is to meet with constituents.
Learn more about house of representatives: https://brainly.com/question/1176086
When directors on a board serve for a fixed term but are not elected all at once it is known as a(n) ______ board. a. cumulative b. staggered c. proxy
Answers
Answer:
B- staggered
Explanation:
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
What is Intellectual property rights
Answers
PLEASE HELP AND GET BRAINLIEST!!!
Which step in the progression of a criminal case requires the government to demonstrate there is sufficient evidence to believe the defendant committed the crime in question?
A. Verdict
B. Arraignment
C. Preliminary hearing
D. Appeal
Answers
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called
a/an?
Answers
Answer:
Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal
Why was it difficult or impossible for the government of the United States,
under the Articles, to settle disputes between the states or between
citizens of different states?
Answers
A Texas law which requires that motorcycle riders wear helmets is most accurately described as... Group of answer choices inter lego. mala in se. quid pro quo. mala prohibita. novus ordo seclorum.
Answers
Answer: mala prohibita
Explanation:
Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.
Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.
Which of these may not be protected under the attorney-client privilege?
Answers
The attorney-client privilege protects from disclosure to third parties: (a) confidential communications; (b) between an attorney and client; (c) made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice. Unless all three of these prongs are met, the communication is not privileged.
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
Answers
In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees
What is the minimum passing grade to earn a CERT certificate from FEMA?
Answers
Answer:
billie Jean is a Chrysler car dealership located