A forensics lab ought to keep both a paper and an electronic visitor sign-in log.
A forensics lab should maintain both a paper and electronic sign-in log for all visitors. The information that should be included in this log includes the visitor's name, date and time of arrival, purpose of visit, duration of visit, and the name of the person they are visiting. Additionally, any items brought into the lab by the visitor should be noted in the log for security purposes. Maintaining both paper and electronic logs allows for redundancy and ensures that there is a backup record in case of technological issues or data loss.
Learn more about log here
https://brainly.com/question/28596588
#SPJ11
Which passage from the Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution?
A.Most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions. The U.S. Constitution didn't even do that. What it did do was say that the Constitution was the "supreme law of the land" and was superior to state laws and constitutions.
B.Some of these were in the Magna Carta, and others were in the English Bill of Rights, which had been written fewer than 100 years before America's revolution. The rights in these documents were citizens' only protection from a government that could be both abusive and unpredictable and over which citizens had almost no control.
C.The Bill of Rights was a gesture of goodwill that was meant to bring everyone together around the new Constitution. Above all, the goal was to see the United States become a nation of unified people.
D.So not only did the Constitution fail to protect individual rights, but it also overruled the protections in state constitutions. It seemed that a bill of rights would be needed to ensure that the federal government could not overstep its bounds.
The Article best supports the notion that the Federalists primarily agreed to the Bill of Rights because they supported the Constitution is that, most states also had a bill of rights and those that didn't at least list individual rights directly in their constitutions.
The supporters of the Constitution, who were the Federalists, thought that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary and even dangerous. So, the authors of The Federalist Papers, including James Madison, argued for the ratification of the Constitution without Bill of Rights.
Federalists argued that the Constitution was not in need of a Bill of Rights, as the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
Hence, option A is correct.
To learn more about the Bill of Rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/10618576
#SPJ1
The Safety Responsibility Law was designed to remove irresponsible drivers from Georgia highways and to protect insured motorists from uninsured motorists. True are false
Answer: True
Explanation:
This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.
How to prove provocation in Crimes
Answer:
Provocation is often a mitigating factor in sentencing. It rarely serves as a legal defense, meaning it does not stop the defendant from being guilty of the crime. It may however, lead to a lesser punishment. In some common law legal systems, provocation is a "partial defense" for murder charges, which can result in the offense being classified as the lesser offense of manslaughter, specifically voluntary manslaughter.
Explanation:
Govt FRQ
While the Constitution creates three separate but equal branches of government, recently many experts have argued that the executive branch has grown to such an extent that it now dominates the government superseding the legislature. Explain the rise of the executive branch using your understanding of the three branches, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
(Use complete sentences and construct an argument as your introduction. Provide evidence in favor of your argument in your supporting paragraph(s).
PLEASE HELP ME I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT PLSS
There is a growing argument among experts that the executive branch of the government has expanded significantly in recent years, leading to a dominant role that supersedes the legislature.
In this response, we will explore the factors contributing to the rise of the executive branch, considering the three branches of government, the legislative process, and the role of the federal bureaucracy.
Supporting Paragraph:
One factor contributing to the rise of the executive branch is the expansion of executive powers granted by the Constitution & federal bureaucracy.and interpreted through judicial rulings. The Constitution designates specific powers to each branch, but over time, the interpretation of these powers has expanded, particularly in the executive branch's favor. For example, the "necessary and proper" clause and the "commerce clause" have been broadly interpreted to grant the executive branch authority to implement policies and regulations that impact various aspects of society.
However, it is important to ensure a proper balance of powers and uphold the principles of checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of our democratic system.
To learn more about federal bureaucracy, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/29614668
#SPJ4
Define the elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment and explain what they mean.
Determine why the founding fathers included a provision in the Bill of Rights pertaining to search and seizure.
Consider DUI checkpoints. Should DUI checkpoints be legal given the provisions of search and seizure as defined by the Bill of Rights?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The elements of this amendment are:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effectsAgainst unreasonable searches and seizuresShall not be violatedWarrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The founding fathers included this provision in the Bill of Rights because they believed that individual liberties, including privacy, were important and needed protection from the government.
Regarding DUI checkpoints, the legality of these checkpoints is a matter of debate and has been challenged in court. The Supreme Court has ruled that DUI checkpoints are constitutional as long as they are reasonable and minimally intrusive. However, this is a complex issue and the specific circumstances of each checkpoint must be evaluated to determine whether it violates the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Example:
Let's consider the following example to understand the Fourth Amendment's provisions on search and seizure.
Imagine that a police officer suspects that a particular person is involved in drug trafficking. The officer wants to search the person's house for evidence. However, without a warrant, the search would be considered an unreasonable one and would violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
To obtain a warrant, the officer must show probable cause that the person is involved in criminal activity and that evidence of that activity can be found in the person's house. The warrant must also describe the place to be searched and the things to be seized. In this case, the warrant would specify the address of the person's house and the items the officer is looking for, such as drugs, drug paraphernalia, or money related to drug sales.
If the warrant is properly obtained, the search is considered reasonable and the evidence found can be used in court. However, if the warrant is not based on probable cause or does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment, the evidence found during the search may be considered inadmissible in court.
In the context of DUI checkpoints, a similar analysis would be performed to determine whether the checkpoint is reasonable and minimally intrusive, and whether it meets the Fourth Amendment's requirements. The specific circumstances, such as the location, time, and duration of the checkpoint, would be considered to determine if the checkpoint is reasonable and does not violate an individual's constitutional rights.
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. If you have any additional questions, please let me know or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.
Elements of the Search and Seizure Amendment relate to the protection of individuals from oppressive government searches and seizures. The founding fathers included a clause in the Bill of Rights on this subject for the protection of citizens and for the protection of the inherent freedoms of man.
What are the freedoms of law?It corresponds to a series of characteristics arranged in the universal declaration of rights that aims to protect man and his rights to social and civil freedom, that is, the possibility of not being oppressed, violated or suffering any threat to his integrity.
Therefore, the US Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, DUI verification being legal and determined by its reasonableness and examination of the circumstances.
Find out more about Search and Seizure on:
https://brainly.com/question/30280195
#SPJ1
If you are a lawyer and your client is found guilty, what will your next steps
be?
Answer: (Major offense)
Explanation:
Comforting the client, being more than just a lawyer but a friend, and someone they could call on for help. Visiting them while their at their correctional facility, and providing support to the client and the clients family.
Which of the following tax return preparers must file federal income tax returns electronically?
Partnerships are the tax return preparers must file federal income tax returns electronically.
What is meant by the tax return preparer?Any anyone who prepares tax returns for money, or who hires one or more others to do so, is referred to as a "tax return preparer." This includes those who create tax returns that must be filed under this title or those that must be claimed as tax refunds.
On behalf of individuals and corporations, tax preparers draft, compute, and submit income tax returns.
A tax return preparer, also known as a TRP, is a qualified individual who has undergone training from the Income Tax Department. A TRP provides services to taxpayers in the convenience of their own homes in order to assist with the filing of their tax returns. TRPs won't be allowed to submit tax returns, but this could be in situations when a tax audit is required.
Read more on the tax preparers here:https://brainly.com/question/6779776
#SPJ1
Complete question not found
What is the average speed of a car that travels 150 meters in 5 seconds
Answer: 3:33
Explanation:
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
Human beings are the only animal accountable before the law discuss in critical thinking apparoach
Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.
One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.
Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.
Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
according to kenneth c. davis, discretion is defined as
According to Kenneth C. Davis, discretion is defined as an official action by a criminal justice official based on that individual's judgment about the best course of action.
Kenneth C. Davis defines discretion in the context of the criminal justice system as the exercise of judgment by a criminal justice official to determine the most appropriate course of action. This means that the official has the authority to make decisions based on their assessment of the situation and their understanding of the circumstances involved.
Discretion allows criminal justice officials, such as judges or law enforcement officers, to consider various factors when making decisions. These factors may include the severity of the offense, the individual's background, the available evidence, and public safety concerns. It gives the official the flexibility to apply their expertise and make informed judgments based on their understanding of the specific case.
By exercising discretion, criminal justice officials can tailor their actions to the unique circumstances of each situation, rather than adhering strictly to rigid guidelines or rules. It acknowledges that not all cases are the same and allows for a more individualized and nuanced approach to decision-making within the criminal justice system.
Learn more about discretion here:
brainly.com/question/30479184
#SPJ11
The complete question is:
According to Kenneth C. Davis, discretion is defined as
A. a decision based on sound public policy.
B. a decision by a judge based upon all the facts submitted by an individual.
C. an official action by a criminal justice official based on that individual's judgement about the best course of action.
D. reinforcement of law with a good decision.
NEED HELP!!! 50 POINTS
Question : Please Define the following forms of government. Explain each of these forms of government or governmental philosophies their economic policies,social welfare policies and human right practices.
Capitalism
Communism
Socialism
Marxism
Answer: I scratch your back... you scratch mine?
I need some help too so could you look at my question after these answers?
Explanation:
In simple terms:
Capitalism is a type of economic system mostly in which the rich own and control private property and "private actors" according to their interests for and in society.
Communism: Also can be considered an "Economic system" except this one individual people do not own land or factories or anything. The whole community and government own these things. Everyone shares the wealth everyone creates.
Socialism: Also an economic system and political one too. This one is a type of way to "organize society"
In this one, the overall goal is to spread the wealth in fair amounts. If Im rich with 2 in the household and you're poor with 2 in the household and their a scarce in food. The government will evenly divide the food to all. The rich will get a total of 3 potatoes and the poor as well. Because I am rich I will not get more, because you are poor, you will not get less. It's about fairness and being even. What a nice government :)
Marxism:
There si no type of class in this government. Everyone in society works for a common good and the casual "class struggle" is no longer in existence. No labels, we are all one.
Good answer? If not lmk and Ill help you out a little more
which two statements about retaliation are true ?
Retaliation is a deliberate action designed to send a strong message that complaining is undesirable and dangerous. It's being used to induce fear in those who may contemplate filing a complaint in the future.
Counterproductive behavior in reaction to unequal treatment is generally an attempt to restore justice by getting even with a person or organization and is referred to as revenge.The Spartans opted to retaliate, beginning the First Peloponnesian War.Managers are vulnerable to disciplinary measures if they engage in retaliation.Learn more about the retaliation:
brainly.com/question/12887443
2. Explain How Cultural Stereotypes
Can Negatively Influence Decision I
Making in Criminal Justice Settings
Answer:
Cultural stereotypes are generalizations or assumptions people make about individuals or groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or other cultural characteristics. These stereotypes can hurt decision-making in criminal justice settings, such as during police investigations, jury selection, and sentencing.
One of the ways that cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making is through racial profiling. Police officers may make assumptions about individuals based on their race or ethnicity, leading to unfair treatment, such as being stopped and searched without cause or being treated with more suspicion than other individuals.
Cultural stereotypes can also impact jury selection and the verdicts that are reached. Jurors may hold biases or assumptions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to wrongful convictions or acquittals. For example, a juror may assume that a defendant from a certain cultural background is likelier to commit a certain crime, even if there is no evidence to support this claim.
In addition, cultural stereotypes can impact sentencing decisions. Judges may have preconceived notions about individuals based on their cultural background, which can lead to harsher or more lenient sentences. For example, a judge may believe that a defendant from a specific cultural background is more likely to be violent and, therefore may impose a harsher sentence than they would for someone from a different background who committed the same crime.
Cultural stereotypes can negatively influence decision-making in criminal justice settings by leading to unfair treatment, wrongful convictions, and unequal sentencing. Criminal justice professionals need to be aware of these biases and work to mitigate their impact on decision-making. This can include education and training on cultural competence and efforts to increase diversity and representation within the criminal justice system.
Cultural stereotypes can have a detrimental impact on decision-making in criminal justice settings due to the biases they create. These stereotypes are preconceived notions or generalizations about individuals based on their race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other cultural factors.
When these stereotypes influence decision-making in the criminal justice system, several negative consequences can occur:
1. Racial Profiling: Cultural stereotypes can lead to racial profiling, where law enforcement officers or other criminal justice professionals target individuals from specific racial or ethnic backgrounds based on assumptions or biases. This can result in unwarranted stops, searches, arrests, and disproportionate scrutiny of certain groups, regardless of individual behavior or evidence.
2. Unfair Treatment: Stereotypes can affect how suspects, defendants, witnesses, and victims are treated throughout the criminal justice process. When decision-makers hold prejudiced views, they may unconsciously or consciously treat individuals differently, leading to unjust outcomes.
3. Bias in Charging and Sentencing: Stereotypes can impact charging decisions and sentencing recommendations. For example, a prosecutor may be more likely to pursue harsher charges against a person from a specific cultural background based on stereotypes, even if the evidence does not support it.
4. Jury Bias: Stereotypes can influence jurors' perceptions and judgments during trials, affecting the fairness of the jury's decision. Biases may affect the credibility and sympathy given to witnesses or defendants, potentially leading to biased verdicts.
5. Resource Allocation: Cultural stereotypes can also affect resource allocation within the criminal justice system. Certain communities may receive more scrutiny or resources based on stereotypes, while others may be overlooked or underserved.
6. Impact on Rehabilitation: Stereotypes can influence decisions regarding parole, probation, or diversion programs, potentially hindering the successful rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals back into society.
7. Public Perception: When cultural stereotypes influence decision-making, it can erode public trust in the criminal justice system. Communities that feel unfairly targeted or treated are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement or participate fully in the legal process.
Addressing and mitigating the influence of cultural stereotypes in criminal justice settings is crucial for ensuring fairness, equity, and justice. Training law enforcement officers, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other stakeholders in cultural competency and unconscious bias awareness can help reduce the impact of stereotypes on decision-making. Implementing policies and procedures that promote objectivity, transparency, and accountability can also contribute to more equitable outcomes in the criminal justice system.
To know more about Cultural stereotypes:
https://brainly.com/question/31064678
#SPJ2
What is John’s designation? John has commanded his troops to defeat the attacking country’s army. He has also declared a national emergency. John is the _______ of the country.
Answer:
President
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in this scenario, the best guess would be that John is the President of the country in question. This is because ANY individual that acts on behalf of the government and has been granted special or extraordinary power by the government has the ability to declare a national emergency. Yet the President of the country is usually known as the commander of the armed forces and holds the highest rank when making decisions on attacking another country. Therefore John designation would be as President of the country.
Who has the power to make the laws?
Hi,
All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or changes existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.
Hope this helps! :)
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived ______ distinction.
Many countries struggle with the issue of immigration, illustrating a strongly perceived in-group/out-group distinction.
What does in-group and out-group refers to?An in-group is a social group that a person mentally identifies with in sociology and social psychology. An out-group, on the other hand, is a social group with which a person does not identify. People may identify, for instance, with their peer group, family, neighborhood, sports team, political party, gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, or country. Numerous occurrences have been discovered to be correlated with psychological membership in social groups and categories.
Henri Tajfel and associates developed social identity theory in the 1970s, which led to the widespread use of the concept. A technique known as the minimal group paradigm was used to determine the importance of in-group and out-group classification.
To learn more about in-group and out-group from given link
https://brainly.com/question/7548841
#SPJ4
What is the minimum blood content of a controlled substance that is considered proof of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated in indiana?
Answer:
I believe it is 0.08
Explanation:
Which of the following characteristics was just recently established (since June 2020) as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964? National origin Race Sexual orientation Sex 10:09 AM Religion
The characteristic that was recently established as a protected class in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is sexual orientation.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a comprehensive law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin in several areas such as employment, education, housing, and public accommodations. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Sexual orientation was not included in the original version of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but in June 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. This was a landmark decision for the LGBTQ+ community and a significant expansion of civil rights protections in the United States.
Learn more about President Lyndon B. Johnson:
https://brainly.com/question/1172086
#SPJ11
Foreign Policy Elaborate and Evaluate
Foreign policy refers to a government's strategy in dealing with other nations. Its effectiveness is evaluated based on its outcomes.
Foreign policy involves decisions and actions taken by a country's leaders to achieve specific goals and objectives in the international arena.
Foreign policy can be evaluated based on its effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes. Key factors that determine the effectiveness of foreign policy include the ability to protect national security interests, promote economic development, maintain positive relationships with allies and other countries, and advance the country's values and ideals.
An effective foreign policy requires a deep understanding of global politics, economics, and culture. It also requires strong diplomatic skills, effective communication, and the ability to negotiate and compromise when necessary.
Overall, foreign policy plays a critical role in shaping a country's relationship with other nations and in promoting its interests and values on the world stage. The effectiveness of foreign policy can have a significant impact on a country's security, prosperity, and global standing.
For more such question on Foreign policy
https://brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ8
What are the elements of an arrest?
Answer:
Arrest consists of three (3) elements: a. Restraint of liberty; b. Intent to make an arrest; c. Comprehension by the detainee that he/she is under arrest
Explanation:
is this what u mean?
Answer:
Restraint of liberty, Intent to make an arrest, and Comprehension by the detainee that he/she is under arrest. brainiest?
(>人<)
Explanation:
protection of habeas corpus means that?
Answer: citizens cannot be held without legal action.
Which of the following actions is illegal for selling alcohol
Answer:
no options
Explanation:
An item that is releasing a mix of particulates and aerosols as well as gases is referred to as:
Answer:
Off-Aggregating
Explanation:
Johanna has a history of serious drug use. Which of the following would be the most appropriate disposition for her case? A. referral to mandatory drug treatment program B. referral to a probation officer C. six months of jail time D. destruction of Johanna's juvenile records
Answer:
A. referral to mandatory drug treatment program
Explanation:
Brainliest?
You are completing an orientation to become a detention officer, and your trainer asks you to describe the skills you bring to this job. How would you describe your skills for this position? Show a connection between these skills and specific aspects of the job. Write your response in approximately 150 words.
i need it quick
I possess a unique combination of skills that make me well-suited for the job of a detention officer. My background in psychology and conflict resolution has given me the ability to understand and respond to the needs of detained individuals.
What is psychology?Psychology is the study of the mind and behavior. It is an academic discipline that seeks to understand individuals and groups by establishing general principles and researching specific cases.
I am also proficient in problem-solving, which is essential for this role as it requires addressing challenging issues in a timely and effective manner. Moreover, I am an attentive listener, which helps me to quickly assess the situation and respond appropriately.
My excellent communication and interpersonal skills are also valuable to this position. I have the ability to build positive relationships with detainees and other staff, which is important for creating a safe and secure environment. I am also able to remain calm under pressure, which is crucial for this role since it involves dealing with difficult and sometimes hostile individuals. Lastly, I am highly organized, enabling me to manage multiple tasks efficiently and effectively.
Overall, I have the necessary skills to be an effective detention officer. My combination of psychology, conflict resolution, problem-solving, communication, and interpersonal skills will be beneficial for creating a secure environment for detainees and staff members alike. My organization and ability to remain calm under pressure will also be an asset in this role.
To learn more about psychology
https://brainly.com/question/28576673
#SPJ1
which of the following is a defense accepted in some states whereby the defendant is not liable for the percentage of harm that he or she can prove can be attributed to the plaintiff's own negligence? multiple choice question.
The defense you are referring to is called "Comparative Negligence." This legal principle is accepted in some states and allows the defendant to avoid full liability for the harm caused by proving that a percentage of the harm can be attributed to the plaintiff's own negligence. In such cases, the defendant's liability is reduced proportionately to the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff.
This defense promotes fairness by ensuring that each party is held responsible for their respective contributions to the harm. The defense that is accepted in some states whereby the defendant is not liable for the percentage of harm that he or she can prove can be attributed to the plaintiff's own negligence is called "comparative negligence."
This defense allows the defendant to argue that the plaintiff's own actions contributed to the harm suffered and therefore should bear some responsibility for it. Under comparative negligence, the damages awarded to the plaintiff are reduced by the percentage of fault that is attributed to them. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault, they will only receive 70% of the damages awarded. This defense is recognized in many states and can be a powerful tool for defendants in personal injury cases.
Learn more about percentage here:
https://brainly.com/question/29306119
#SPJ11
in federal court, and without a court order, which of the following is an authorized way to serve process on an individual?
In federal court, there are several authorized ways to serve process on an individual without a court order. These include:
Personal Service: This is the most traditional method of service, where a process server personally delivers the summons and complaint to the individual.
Mailing: Service can be accomplished by mailing a copy of the summons and complaint by first-class mail, with an additional copy sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.
Waiver of Service: An individual can waive their right to service by signing a written waiver of service form, which must be filed with the court.
Substituted Service: Service can be made at the individual's residence or usual place of abode by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint with someone of suitable age and discretion who lives there.
Service by Publication: In certain circumstances, service can be made by publishing notice of the lawsuit in a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the individual is believed to reside.
It is important to note that these methods are subject to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and the jurisdiction where the process server serves the summons. Also, the court may require additional steps to be taken to serve the process in certain circumstances.
Find out more about Federal court
brainly.com/question/14114384
#SPJ4
why did reformers want to change the way children were treated? what steps did reforms take to make changes? when did these changes begin to take place?
Reformers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries sought to change the way children were treated in the United States for a variety of reasons.
One major concern was the exploitation and abuse of child labor, which was widespread in many industries, including textiles, mining, and agriculture. Reformers also sought to improve the educational opportunities and overall well-being of children, recognizing that early childhood experiences could have a profound impact on a child's future.
To achieve these goals, reformers took a number of steps. One major approach was to pass legislation at the local, state, and federal levels that placed limits on child labor, established minimum working ages, and provided for compulsory education.
These laws helped to reduce the number of children working in dangerous and exploitative conditions, and gave more children the opportunity to attend school.
Another key step taken by reformers was to establish institutions and organizations dedicated to improving the lives of children. This included the creation of orphanages, juvenile detention centers, and other facilities designed to provide safe and healthy environments for children who were at risk of neglect or abuse.
Additionally, reformers established advocacy groups and professional organizations focused on promoting the rights and well-being of children.
These changes began to take place in the late 19th century and continued into the early 20th century. The first state child labor laws were passed in the 1880s, and the National Child Labor Committee was founded in 1904 to advocate for further reforms.
The 20th century saw continued progress in areas such as education, health care, and child welfare, with landmark legislation such as the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act establishing a federal minimum wage and maximum hours for child workers.
To know more about reform refer to-
brainly.com/question/583929#
#SPJ11
Ok I swear the censor thing is annoying. I just wanna gib som points to my hommies ya feel me?