A legally acceptable ID has which characteristic?
a. physical description of the holder
O b. serial number
O c. residential address
O d. city of birth

Answer:

no

Explanation:

The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.

Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).

PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.

To know more about PII visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30023988

#SPJ1

Answer:

Pros: She will learn from her mistake. Cons: It could be difficult to pay the fine and still be able to get essentials.

Answer:

In no less than 200-words, describe how you would craft a new policy that allowed officers to determine if individuals were plotting terrorist acts or carrying concealed weapons.

Explanation:

Significantly, a person holding a state-issued permit allowing the person to acquire or possess firearms (e.g., a concealed weapons permit) is not required to undergo a background check if the permit was issued: (1) within the previous five years in the state in which the transfer is to take place; and (2) after an authorized government official has conducted a background investigation to verify that possession of a firearm would not be unlawful.13 Permits issued after November 30, 1998 qualify as exempt only if the approval process included a NICS check.14

The theme of the book, "Criminal Justice" is:

The difference between the individual rights perspective and the public order perspective is this:

A theme refers to the central message that a text has for its readers. The theme of the text on Criminal Justice is about the interplay between Individual rights and public order.

Whereas the rights of individuals are safeguarded through the criminal justice system, public order helps to ensure that the rights of people in a society are maintained.

Learn more about criminal justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/27846688

#SPJ1

The exception to the Statute of Frauds, which allows an oral contract for the transfer of land to be enforced, if the buyer has either paid for the land or taken possession of the land is called the Part performance exception. The correct option is d.

The part performance doctrine is a important rejection from the Statute of Frauds' application to agreements involving the sale of real estate. When an oral contract for the sale of land has been partially performed, the part performance exception applies.

Performance in part is When a person agrees to transfer any movable property for money in writing that is either signed by him or on his behalf and contains all the terms that must be agreed upon in order for the transfer to be valid. The correct option is d.

Learn more about Statute of Frauds at:

brainly.com/question/6806950

#SPJ4

Answer:

please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied with my answer

Explanation:

Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure.

Answer:

What possible legal defense(s) could they use for criminal charges related to the burglary?

Explanation:

Answer:

There are five leading indicators that are the most useful to follow. They are the yield curve, durable goods orders, the stock market, manufacturing orders, and building permits.

Answer: False

Explanation:

An Appeals Court Judge is a Federal Judge which means they have to be nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. The requirements to be nominated however, are not very stringent.

A nominee for instance, does not even have to hold a law degree talk more of having been a practicing attorney. Although informal criteria exists, they do not revolve around an individual having been a practicing attorney so this statement is false.

Answer:

Severity and Tenacity

Explanation:

Common law consists of the present day British court. The transgressions are generally based on severity and paying the right consequence.

The development of what we now know as contemporary EMS began in the 1950s as a spinoff of five separate industries: towing companies, medical equipment manufacturers, cemeteries, hospitals, and police and fire agencies.

Development is a process that fosters expansion, advancement, and good change in the economic, environmental, social, and demographic aspects without depleting the environment's natural resources. All projects must need approval, but because they all have varying degrees of influence, they are divided into three categories. Complying,

As a spinoff of five distinct industries—towing firms, medical equipment companies, funeral homes, hospitals, and police/fire departments—the development of what we now know as modern EMS began in the 1950s.

Therefore, The development of what we now know as contemporary EMS began in the 1950s

Learn more about development here:

https://brainly.com/question/28011228

#SPJ1

Answer:

morticians

hospitals

fire departments

Explanation:

i got it have a good day

Answer:

Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.

Explanation:

Answer:

Hold on a sec I got it

To bring a lawsuit in a court, the plaintiff must stand the sue, the court must have personal jurisdiction, and the case must be brought in the proper venue.

Hence, the correct option is C.

A person who brings a lawsuit must provide sufficient evidence to convince the commission of such an act by the defendant in front of the jury, it is necessary that the court where the lawsuit has been presented must have Jurisdiction over the parties based on the facts and evidence provided, and the lawsuit must be brought in the jurisdiction of the authority where the crime occurred.

To know more about  "law suit"

brainly.com/question/15028192

#SPJ4

Answer:

C. An appropriation

Explanation:

Democracy can be defined as a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

There are two (2) main types of democracy and these include;

I. Representative democracy.

II. Direct democracy.

Generally, the type of government in which legislators such as senators or house of representative members are found is known as a democracy and they are saddled with the responsibility of enacting or making laws, amending or ratifying laws, appropriation of budget, passage of bills, etc.

An appropriation is a type of congressional legislation which provides for the funding of government programs. It comprises of proposed law by the legislature that gives the government of a particular country the authority to fund certain projects with a concise description of what the funds are to be used for.

Answer:

does this help?

Explanation:

The Social Security Act was enacted in 1935 and was the most significant piece of social welfare legislation in the United States. The main purpose of the Social Security Act was to provide economic security for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled.

Through the Act, a national system of social insurance was established that provided a guaranteed income for retired workers. The Act also provided unemployment insurance and aid to families with dependent children and the disabled.

Additionally, the Act set up government agencies to administer the programs, including the Social Security Administration, which is responsible for administering the Social Security program. The Social Security Act helped to protect individuals from the financial risks of old age, disability, and unemployment by providing a steady income for them.

know more about Security Act here

https://brainly.com/question/29218517#

#SPJ11

Answer:

increase spending and lower taxes.

Explanation:

He believed this would stimulate the economy.

Answer:

How the country would be different today if "separate but equal" were still the law include:

1. The Jim Crow laws would have ensured the disunity of the United States, with the Confederation of American States (south) separate from the United States of America (north).  

2. The United States would have been a laughing stock of other nations of the world.  It would not be acting as a bastion of democracy and industrial development, as it could not be pushing for democracy in other countries without practicing what it preached.

3. There would have been continuous unrest in the Confederation of American States (US South) and human development would have been hindered a lot, because people of color would be in everlasting revolt in that part of the American continent.

Explanation:

The Jim Crow laws were laws from the pit of hell that enforced racial segregation in the Southern part of the United States.  It was instituted between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 after the civil war and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s.  According to one Nebraska record in 1911, marriages were illegal between a white person and a person of color.  This depicts the extent of the cruelty that was hoisted on the country by the Jim Crow laws.

Answer: Family law is handled by the California Superior Court.

Explanation:

Answer:

gaily cort

Explanation:

guiiiiiiiifet6jnff

Yes, its true that, according to the officer's testimony, yes. In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood.

The accused murderer admitted to the crime but insisted that he killed the victim out of self-defense after she lunged at him with a knife. The investigating officer gave testimony during the trial on the crime scene and the victim's health at the time of death. The prosecutor questioned the officer if the police photographer's image of the crime scene adequately captured what he had seen there. The prosecutor then showed the officer the photo. According to the officer's testimony, yes.

In the photos, the deceased was seen with both of her hands severed, laying in a pool of blood. motive, planning, and earlier or later behavior.— Any truth that demonstrates or serves as a justification or preparation for any significant information or fact at issue is relevant.

Learn more about self-defense Visit: brainly.com/question/29542705

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

State true or false : A defendant charged with murder admitted to the killing but claimed that he shot the victim in self-defense as she attacked him with a knife. at trial, the investigating officer testified about the scene of the crime and the condition of the victim at the time of death. the prosecutor showed the officer a photograph of the scene of the crime taken by the police photographer and asked the officer whether the photograph accurately depicted what he had observed at the scene. the officer testified that it did. the photograph showed the deceased lying in a pool of blood with both her hands cut off.

Answer:

sick cartoon lol

Explanation:

Answer:

they didn't have a warrant so they shouldn't have forced there way in. Also they cannot be arrested

Explanation:

hoped this helped sry if wrong lol

A legislative measure that deals with only one chamber of the legislature is called a Simple resolution

A simple resolution in the US is a piece of legislation that is only approved by the Senate or the House. Simple resolutions are not forwarded to the President and do not become laws because they have only been enacted by one parliament.

The resolution is used for things like setting the guidelines by which each body shall function. Resolutions of this kind are used to act or speak on behalf of a single congressional chamber in U.S.

To know more about resolutions refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13168863

#SPJ4

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

In a serious collision that there is a 50 percent chance that your car would be on fire.

This is as  a result of a force that would cause a moving vehicle to collide forcefully with another object.

When this happens there may be a fire. A good reason that may cause the fire is the fact that the car runs on fuel and this may spill during the collision.

Read more on collisions here:

https://brainly.com/question/4403635

yes she will  because she made an appointment to do so

She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.

According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.

As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.

Learn more about on Law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6534668

#SPJ5

Note that using the wage bracket method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $0.

Using the information provided, we can calculate Beckett Rice's income tax withholding using both the percentage method and the wage bracket method:

Percentage Method:

Step 1: Determine the annual wages by multiplying the semimonthly wages by the number of pay periods in a year.

Annual wages = $3,000 x 24 = $72,000

Step 2: Subtract the annual withholding allowances from the annual wages to get the taxable income.

Taxable income = $72,000 - ($4,000 x 2) = $64,000

Step 3: Use the IRS tax tables to determine the annual federal income tax withholding. For a married filing jointly taxpayer with $64,000 in taxable income, the annual federal income tax withholding is $8,392.

Step 4: Divide the annual federal income tax withholding by the number of pay periods in a year to get the semimonthly federal income tax withholding.

Semimonthly federal income tax withholding = $8,392 / 24 = $349.67

Step 5: Subtract any additional amounts to be withheld for state and local taxes, if applicable.

Therefore, using the percentage method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $349.67.

Wage Bracket Method:

Step 1: Determine the semimonthly wages after subtracting any additional deductions from gross wages.

Semimonthly wages = $3,000 - $3,000 = $0

Step 2: Use the IRS tax tables to determine the semimonthly federal income tax withholding for a married filing jointly taxpayer with no withholding allowances and $0 in semimonthly wages. According to the tax tables, the semimonthly federal income tax withholding is $0.

Step 3: Subtract any additional amounts to be withheld for state and local taxes, if applicable.

Therefore, using the wage bracket method, Beckett Rice's federal income tax withholding for the semimonthly period is $0.

Learn more about income tax withholding at:

https://brainly.com/question/11233097

#SPJ1

Wrongful birth refers to a scenario whereby medical professionals do not adequately advise a parent about potential abnormalities in their unborn child during prenatal testing.

The parent may have decided against having the baby if they had known of the issues beforehand. Such parents can sue the healthcare provider for wrongful birth. There is no one right answer to whether a cause of action should be allowed in a wrongful birth. However, let's advocate against it.

It is not ethical to allow for wrongful birth lawsuits. Firstly, the responsibility of such lawsuits falls squarely on medical professionals. Medical professionals already carry an immense burden of dealing with human life. Doctors should not have to carry additional weight in cases where the issue was not caused by the medical personnel. As a result, wrongful birth cases may be detrimental to medical professionals' careers. Doctors may stop taking on high-risk cases to avoid potential litigation, resulting in the loss of innocent lives.Secondly, wrongful birth cases are a blatant disregard of human life. The child is a living and breathing individual that should not be subject to lawsuits. A child is a gift and a blessing regardless of their physical or mental condition. The laws surrounding wrongful birth should not devalue human life.Finally, wrongful birth lawsuits promote eugenics, which is a practice of selectively choosing traits in offspring. If wrongful birth lawsuits were to be allowed, it would lead to the promotion of aborting children with any perceived abnormality. It is ethically wrong to promote selective abortion based on perceived genetic defects.

In conclusion, wrongful birth lawsuits are not ethical. They promote selective abortions and disregard human life. Medical professionals are already under a great burden, and wrongful birth lawsuits would increase their workload and cause them unnecessary stress. A child's life is precious, and their physical or mental conditions do not determine their worth. Therefore, a cause of action for wrongful birth should not be allowed.

To know more about ethical visit:

brainly.com/question/30590798

#SPJ11