a memeber of congess, wo has never had a economics course, has just been places on a money and bakin comitte. the offical needs a brieing prop to the first meeting conering

Answers

Answer 1

The official should keep in mind this when attending the first committee meeting that there is a direct, albeit ambiguous, relationship between the growth of the money supply and the level of prices as well as a direct relationship between the growth of the money supply and GDP growth.

The amount of money in the financial system can be increased or decreased by central banks through a variety of techniques. Monetary policy is the term used to describe these acts. Although the Federal Reserve Board, also known as the Fed, has the authority to manufacture paper money at its discretion in an effort to boost the economy's supply of cash, this is not the method employed, at least not in the United States. All domestic monetary policy is governed by the Federal Reserve Board, which is the organization responsible for overseeing the Federal Reserve System. They are frequently referred to as the American Central Bank. As a result, they are typically held accountable for regulating both short-term and long-term interest rates as well as controlling inflation.

To increase or decrease the amount of money in the economy, central banks employ a variety of techniques known as monetary policy.By decreasing the reserve requirements for banks, which enables them to lend more money, the Fed can expand the money supply.The Fed can reduce the amount of money in circulation by increasing the reserve requirements for banks, on the other hand.By reducing (or increasing) the discount rate that banks pay on short-term loans from the Fed, the Fed can likewise change the short-term interest rates.

To learn more about Federal Reserve Board please click on the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/14700070

#SPJ4

Related Questions

Distinguish the various methods of intelligence collection.

Answers

The methods of intelligence collection are:

Human Intelligence Signals IntelligenceImagery/Geospatial Intelligence

What is intelligence collection ?

Intelligence Collection as well as be regarded as the Military Intelligence which is a form of collection that that involves the development of highly-trained workforce.

So that they can collect as well as analyze and perform some evaluation of sensitive military intelligence.

Signals Intelligence which is one of the method of collection involves the collection of foreign intelligence which can be gotten from the communications a well as information systems for instance in the military officials as well as other forms of it.

Answers

Answer:

8) no

9) resisting arrest

10) eluding officer

In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees

Answers

Can you take your common law marriage to other states?

Answers

Answer:

you're not in common law marriage after 7 years together but it's under that duration you can

Which of the following is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading?

Answers

The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.

What is protocol?

Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.

Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading. The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.

Learn more about protocol here:https://brainly.com/question/5660386

#SPJ1

A writing sample that has been made to look like someone else's handwriting is a:

Answers

Answer:

cursive

Explanation:

how can class evidence become individual evidence.

Answers

Answer:

Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.

Explanation:

I hope it helps you

Identify the judiciary power that the office of attorney general has in common with the supreme court.

Answers

The power of judicial review the office of attorney general has in common with the supreme court.

courtroom docket, additionally known as courtroom docket of law, someone or frame of humans having judicial authority to listen and solve disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or navy cases.“Courts exist to do justice, (emphasis added) to assure liberty, to decorate social order, to solve disputes, to hold rule of law, to offer for the same protection, and to make the certain due manner of law.”

The Court's position is to settle, according to global law, criminal disputes submitted to it through States and to present advisory reviews on criminal questions stated through legal United Nations organs and specialized agencies. The phrase courtroom docket comes from the French cour, an enclosed yard, which derives from the Latin shape cōrtem.

Learn more about court here

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

what does rule of conduct mean?

Answers

Answer:

Code of conduct

Code of conductA code of conduct is a set of rules outlining the norms, rules, and responsibilities or proper practices of an individual party or an organization.

-Wikipedia

The Rules of Conduct is a set of implementing laws of professional practice that seek to express the primary examples of ethical behavior consistent with the Code of Ethics.

After several robberies in a city, the government deploys a number of police personnel and provides helpline numbers to the residents of the city. This is done because recent research conducted by a team of criminologists showed that the increase of security in crime-prone areas helps in the reduction of crime. This conversion of research into practice is known as ________. A: Evidence Based Criminology B: Translational criminology C: Knowledge-based criminology D:Experimental criminology

Answers

I would say it is A) Evidence Based criminology simply because if they had already researched it and put it in motion it would be evident that that would work simply of of research and studies .

The answer is A

Give a like

nment is based on the previous assignment of Strategic Human Resource Plan presented as a Head of the Human Resources (HR) of the multinational company chosen by you to the board of Directors of that company. You are required to present a PowerPoint presentation and a management report on the below tasks. Task I : Critically review and evaluate the extent to which an organization's Human Resources are strategically managed in the HRM context of an organization (AC D.1, AC D.2) Possible Evidence:- (Organization values, methods and tools used by the organization,impact of globalization, strategic relationships,compliances etc) Task II: Based on all the research and observations of the organization,develop justified recommendations for how an organization could improve it

Answers

Task I: Critically review and evaluate the extent to which an organization's Human Resources are strategically managed in the HRM context of an organization (AC D.1, AC D.2)

Possible Evidence:

Organization values: Review the company's mission, vision, and values statements to determine if they align with a strategic approach to HR management.Methods and tools used by the organization: Examine the HR systems and processes in place, such as performance management, recruitment and selection, and training and development.Impact of globalization: Consider the impact of globalization on the organization and how it affects the HR management practices.Strategic relationships: Evaluate the relationships between HR and other departments, such as finance and marketing, to determine if they are strategic.Compliance: Assess the organization's compliance with relevant laws and regulations related to HR management.

Task II: Based on all the research and observations of the organization,develop justified recommendations for how an organization could improve its HR management practices

Possible Evidence:

Conduct a gap analysis to identify areas where the organization's HR management practices fall short of best practices.Develop a comprehensive HR strategy that aligns with the organization's overall business strategy.Implement effective HR systems and processes, such as performance management and training and development programs.Develop strong relationships between HR and other departments to ensure that HR is a strategic business partner.Ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations related to HR management.Continuously monitor and evaluate HR management practices to ensure that they are effective and aligned with the organization's goals.

Learn more about Human Resources

https://brainly.com/question/30999753

#SPJ11

1. In a case involving an ADR clause, the parties to a contract disagreed as to whether the clause required them to submit a dispute over a trade secret problem to arbitration. The clause required the parties to submit “any controversy or claim arising out of the agreement” to arbitration. Strictly speaking, the trade secret controversy did not arise “out of” the agreement; however, it was clear that the trade secret dispute was related to the agreement. The trial court held that the language of the ADR clause was too narrow and that because the trade secret dispute did not arise out of the controversy, the parties were not required to send it to arbitration. Should the appellate court overrule the trial court’s decision rejecting the requirement that the parties arbitrate the trade secret dispute? Explain your response.

Answers

Is the awnser for this one

1. In a case involving an ADR clause, the parties to a contract disagreed as to whether the clause required

Bruce is charged with violating the Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). To be guilty of crime under the act, the prosecutor must prove that Bruce
a. accessed a computer without authority only.
b. accessed a computer without authority or took data.
c. accessed a computer without authority and took data.
d. took restricted or protected data only.

Answers

In the context of the situation of the context that has been provided above, it is to be stated that the prosecutor must prove that Bruce accessed a computer without an authorization. Therefore, the option A holds true.

A prosecutor is the person who has been given the responsibility of acting in either defense or proving the guilt of the plaintiff or the defendant. Moreover, the prosecutor must be putting his points in the direct interest of his or her client. This also includes to prove that his client had an unauthorized access to the computer.

Learn more about a prosecutor here:

https://brainly.com/question/12057544

#SPJ4

how to draft simple summons in civil procedure

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

What is a summon/Where to find it?

Complete the form. The summons document in most courts has a preferred format. Contact the clerk's office if a form or example is not accessible on the court's website. The summons should be "issued." A summons isn't legitimate unless it's signed by the clerk of the court where you filed your complaint.

What do you need in your summon?

Identify who is being sued. You'll need the person, business, or other entity you've designated as a defendant in the lawsuit's entire legal name and address. Each person or entity you are suing must get a separate summons.

A bag contains 5 marbles that are each a different color. a marble is drawn, its color is recorded, and then the marble is placed back in the bag. this process is repeated until 30 marbles have been drawn. the table shows the results.
for which marble is the experimental probability of drawing the marble the same as the theoretical probability?

Answers

Looking at the table provided, we can see that each color of marble has been drawn a certain number of times. To find the theoretical probability of drawing a particular marble, we divide the number of times that marble appears in the bag by the total number of marbles. Since there are 5 different colored marbles, each with a count of 5 in the bag, the total number of marbles in the bag is 25. Therefore, the theoretical probability of drawing any particular marble is 5/25, or 1/5.

To find the experimental probability of drawing a particular marble, we look at the number of times that marble was actually drawn out of the 30 total marbles. For example, if the red marble was drawn 6 times out of the 30, the experimental probability of drawing the red marble would be 6/30, or 1/5. From the table, we can see that the experimental probability of drawing the blue marble is the same as the theoretical probability, both being 1/5. This means that out of the 30 total marbles drawn, the blue marble was drawn exactly 6 times, which matches the expected value of 6 times based on the theoretical probability. the experimental probability of drawing the blue marble is the same as the theoretical probability. This indicates that the sample drawn is representative of the expected probabilities, and the experiment is reliable.

to know about experimental probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30694293

#SPJ11

If you are convicted of a DUI you could lose your life savings paying fines or restitution to the people that you have injured or killed.

a) true
b) false

Answers

a. true , i hope this helps!

who makes the release decision when an offender is sentenced to shock parole?

Answers

In the United States, the specific procedures and decision-making processes for shock parole may vary by state, but in general, the decision to release an offender sentenced to shock parole is made by a parole board or similar authority.

Shock parole is a type of early release program designed to help offenders transition back into society and reduce the likelihood of reoffending. It involves a period of incarceration followed by a shorter period of supervision in the community, during which the offender must comply with certain conditions such as regular check-ins with a probation or parole officer, drug testing, and participation in treatment programs.

In most cases, the decision to grant shock parole is made by a parole board or similar authority, which considers a variety of factors such as the offender's criminal history, the nature of the offense, and the offender's behavior while incarcerated. If the offender is deemed eligible for shock parole, they may be released from custody on the condition that they comply with the terms of their supervision in the community.

It's worth noting that shock parole is not available in all states, and even in states where it is available, not all offenders may be eligible for the program. Additionally, the decision to grant shock parole is ultimately at the discretion of the parole board or similar authority, and there is no guarantee that an offender will be granted early release through this program.

To know more about ,shock parole click here: https://brainly.com/question/15071335

#SPJ11

What percentage of bills are made into laws each year?

Answers

Answer:

25%

Explanation:

A bill can be introduced in either chamber of Congress by a senator or representative who sponsors it. ... The president can approve the bill and sign it into law or not approve (veto) a bill. If the president chooses to veto a bill, in most cases Congress can vote to override that veto and the bill becomes a law.

Answer:

25%

Explanation:

Have a great day

what are the principal noncharacter uses "other crimes" evidence?

Answers

Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is available for "non-character purposes," such as motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake/accident.

brainliest? (❁´◡`❁)

The Reynolds Case decision equated Mormon marriage practices with what?
A. Asian practices with no history in the U.S.
B. Irish Catholics
C. Medieval Christian customs
D. English Common Law

Answers

The Reynolds Case decision equated Mormon marriage practices with Medieval Christian customs. The correct option is C.

Mormon marriage practices were compared to Christian traditions from the Middle Ages in the Reynolds Case ruling. The United States Supreme Court ruled in Reynolds v. United States (1878) that the First Amendment's freedom of religion provision did not protect the practice of polygamy by members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints commonly known as Mormons.

The Court compared the historical practice of polygamy in ancient societies and some medieval Christian sects to that of Mormonism. It was argued that although religious convictions were protected, some religious practices like polygamy, were viewed negatively and might be outlawed by the state. Therefore, as part of its legal justification in the case, the Court connected Mormon marriage practices to medieval Christian traditions.

Learn more about Reynolds Case at:

brainly.com/question/30090656

#SPJ4

Which of the following is not a step in formal rule making?
A.Publication in Federal Register
B.Formal hearing with a transcript
C.Publication of findings
D.Written comments by the public

Answers

The statement that is not a step in formal rule making is D.Written comments by the public.

What formal rule making?

Rule consistency is described as the accuracy with which rules are implemented to individuals and groups, whereas rule formalization is concerned with how thoroughly organizational rules are documented.

The federal Administrative Procedures Act (APA) establishes two distinct processes for the creation of administrative rules: formal rulemaking, which calls for an on-the-record hearing and the presentation of evidence, much like a court proceeding; and informal rulemaking, which calls for notice to the public and an opportunity for comment on the proposed rule.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about rule at:

https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ1

Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress

Answers

The answer should be d

Answer:

Explanation:

a two-thirds majority of Congress

What is the admissibility of character evidence?

Answers

The purpose for which character evidence is offered will determine whether or not it is admissible during a trial.

It is not admissible to use evidence of a person's character or personality traits to demonstrate that they behaved in a particular way on a given occasion. The "propensity" rule which goes by this name, is meant to stop unjustified bias against the defendant. For instance it would typically be improper to introduce evidence that a defendant has a history of violence in order to establish that they committed a particular act of violence.

The propensity rule does have a few exceptions, though. For instance, if a defendant's character or trait of character is offered to prove another relevant fact, like motivation, intent or the lack of error then it may be admissible. It may be possible to prove that the victim was the aggressor in a physical altercation in some circumstances by introducing evidence of the victim's character.

Learn more about character evidence at:

brainly.com/question/31845492

#SPJ4

What was the outcome of the trial, Madrigal v. Quilligan? Do you feel it was a just verdict? Why or why not?

Answers

Answer:

The verdict in Madrigal v. Quilligan was ultimately in favor of the defendants.

Explanation:

The case Madrigal v. Quilligan was a landmark reproductive rights case heard in the United States in 1978. The case involved a group of 10 Latina women who sued the doctors and hospital that sterilized them without their full knowledge or informed consent while they were giving birth. The women argued that they had been sterilized due to their ethnicity and were not given the opportunity to make an informed decision about the permanent sterilization procedure.

The verdict in Madrigal v. Quilligan was ultimately in favor of the defendants, with the judge ruling that the women's constitutional rights had not been violated. The judge argued that the women had given their consent to the sterilization procedure, and that there was no evidence that the doctors and hospital had acted with discriminatory intent.

Many people, including reproductive rights activists, believed that the verdict was unjust. They argued that the women had not been fully informed about the consequences of the sterilization procedure and that they had been coerced into signing consent forms. Additionally, they argued that the women's race and ethnicity had played a role in the doctors' and hospital's decision to sterilize them, even though there was no direct evidence of discriminatory intent.

In summary, the verdict in Madrigal v. Quilligan was controversial and has been widely criticized as unjust by many reproductive rights advocates. The case highlighted the importance of informed consent and the need for protections against discrimination in medical procedures, particularly for marginalized communities.

There are significant differences between a Criminal Court case and a Civil Court case. If Sike Muldoon was apprehended by the RCMP while attempting to carry out a terrorist act the style of cause for the trial would be ________ and it would be the ____________versus the ____________. If Muldoon wanted to plead not guilty, he would attend_____________ . Then when the matter goes to trial, prosecutor would have to prove Muldoon’s guilt ________________ .

Answers

In a criminal court case, if Sike Muldoon was apprehended by the RCMP while attempting to carry out a terrorist act, the style of cause for the trial would be "R. v. Muldoon," indicating that it is a criminal prosecution.

In a criminal court case, the style of cause is typically represented by "R. v." (which stands for "Regina" or "Rex," meaning the Queen or the King, representing the state) followed by the name of the accused. In this scenario, the style of cause would be "R. v. Muldoon," indicating that it is a criminal prosecution against Sike Muldoon.

If Muldoon wanted to plead not guilty, he would attend a plea hearing, where he would formally enter his plea before the court. At this stage, Muldoon would have the opportunity to state that he disputes the charges against him and intends to defend himself against them.

During the trial, the burden of proof rests on the prosecutor. In a criminal case, the prosecutor must prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecutor needs to present sufficient evidence and establish that there is no reasonable doubt regarding Muldoon's involvement in the attempted terrorist act.

The judge or jury will assess the evidence presented and determine whether the prosecution has met this high standard of proof. If the prosecutor fails to prove Muldoon's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, he would be acquitted of the charges.

To learn more about court case click here: brainly.com/question/482275

#SPJ11

How do we determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers?

Answers

Gender can play a significant role in determining the limits of our obligations to strangers.

Moral obligations of a Mother-

For instance, moms usually shoulder the majority of the burden of parenting their children.

Do moms have different moral obligations than other people? Would you say that a mother leaving her own kids to feed malnourished children in Haiti goes beyond the bounds of moral obligation.

What happens when a mother from Haiti abandons her own children to look after rich children in the first world in order to provide assistance for her family back home.

Determinants of Moral Responsibility-

1) The connection between the agent's actions and the harm that resulted; and 2) The morality of the action without consideration for the effects. Subjects' assessments of the agent's accountability were observed to vary in situations when these two features were at odds, particularly when the injury was not directly caused by the act that was held accountable.

Hence, we can say Gender can be used determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers.

To know more about Moral Obligations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31327835

#SPJ1

please help I don’t know the answer to this.

Answers

I think it’s A but I’m really sorry if I’m wrong

Which would be an example of a crime in most areas?
O refusing to mow your lawn more than once a month
O failing to stop at a state or county stop sign
O failing to hold the door open for someone right behind you
O buying up all the bread and water in a grocery store
< Previous

Answers

Second one failing to stop

Answer: Failing to stop at a state or county stop sign

Explanation:

If a vacancy to a public office falls while the senate is in recess and the president fills that vacancy, how long should that officer’s term last?.

Answers

Heya! It should last until the end of their next session. Have a good day!

What is a practical example of historical costs as a limitation for financial statements

Answers

A practical example of historical costs as a limitation for financial statements are:

fails to disclose the current worth of the enterpriseincomparable items in Financial Statementsits difficult to replace Fixed Assetsleads to inaccurate determination of profit etc.

What are significance of historical costs?

Basically, a historical cost refers to the measure of value used in accounting in which the value of an asset on the balance sheet is recorded at its original cost when acquired by the company. This costing method is used for fixed assets in the United States under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)

In United States, the principle of historical cost is a basic accounting principle under U.S. GAAP where most assets are to be recorded on the balance sheet at their historical cost even if they have significantly increased in value over time. However, not every assets are held at historical cost. For instance, a marketable securities are recorded at their fair market value on the balance sheet and impaired intangible assets are written down from historical cost to their fair market value.