Option first is correct. A written code defining a criminal act and providing the standard punishment for the crime defines a Statute.
About Statute
A law is a formal written enactment of such a legislative body that, with the cooperation of other parties, controls the legal entities of just a city, state, or nation. Statutes often establish policy, order or prohibit certain actions. In contrast to case law or precedent, which would be decided by courts, as well as regulations issued by government agencies, statutes are rules enacted by legislative bodies.
Newly adopted legislation are issued and publicised in almost every nation so that anybody may check them up. This can be done with in shape of a government gazette, which may also contain other official government announcements, or in the form of a collection of books, the content of which is restricted to legislative actions.
To know more about Statute:
brainly.com/question/7582973
#SPJ4
You are a prosecutor and are preparing for an upcoming trial. This is a case of arson, and the defendant is accused of setting fire to a barn, causing it to burn to the ground. You have an abundance of physical evidence that points to the defendant, but you also discover that a set of shoeprints found at the scene matches another suspect. This would be an example of what type of evidence?
Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.
What is evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.
In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.
Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
Josiah is a very likable person, but has been out of trouble, his whole life. He began drinking and taking drugs in high school, his parents him to rehab clinic to break his addictions. Josiah did well for a while, but then got caught up with some friends who were planning to break into a pharmacy to steal drugs. Josiah didn’t want to go along with it, but the idea of getting a large supply of painkillers was just too tempting after the robbery Josiah is arrested. His lawyer says that Joshua does know what is right and wrong, but just can’t stop myself from doing things that are bad. What crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions?
The crime theory is Josiah’s lawyer using to explain his actions is self control theory of crime.
The self-control theory of crime, sometimes known as the general theory of crime, is a criminological theory that holds that a lack of individual self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior.
According to the self-control crime theory, people who were ineffectively parented before the age of ten develop less self-control than others of roughly the same age who were reared with better parenting. Low levels of self-control have also been linked to illegal and impulsive behavior, according to research.
Therefore, the appropriate crime theory to explain Josiah's actions is self-control theory.
To learn more on self-control theory of crime, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27254406
#SPJ1
Una persona por su condición que es migrante en busca de trabajo en una fábrica de procesamiento de pescado es sometida a desprecio e irrespeta su condición de mujer; ¿Qué derecho de la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos, la ampara para garantizar su condición humana?
Answer:
El derecho a la igualdad.
Explanation:
La declaración universal de derechos humanos establece que todas las personas son iguales y tienen los mismos derechos en los campos político, social y económico. Así, es incorrecto que una persona sufra discriminación, desprecio, prejuicio y cualquier otro tipo de injusticia por razón de su género, religión, opción sexual, edad, color, entre otros.
En este caso, podemos decir que si a alguien se le falta el respeto en el trabajo por ser mujer, se está vulnerando el derecho a la igualdad y esto podría tener consecuencias reales.
A state law that violates the U.S. Constitution:
O Can be enforced by that state's government only.
O Can be enforced by the United States Supreme Court only.
o Can be enforced by the federal gchernment only.
Cannot be enforced.
Answer:
Not sure, but this helps! :)
Explanation:
The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution [source: FindLaw]. Basically, if a federal and state law contradicts, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
when a consumer orders an item online and it is never delivered this is an example of quizlet
This is an example of **non-delivery** in online shopping.
Non-delivery occurs when a consumer orders a product online but never receives it. There could be several reasons for this, including logistical issues, shipping errors, or even fraudulent activity. In some cases, the package may have been lost during transit or delivered to the wrong address. It is important for consumers to contact the seller or retailer as soon as they realize the item has not been delivered to resolve the issue. They should provide all relevant information, such as order details, tracking numbers, and any communication with the shipping company. In most cases, the seller or retailer will investigate the matter and take appropriate steps to either resend the item or provide a refund to the consumer. It is advisable for consumers to keep records of their online purchases and maintain open communication with the seller to ensure a timely resolution to any non-delivery issues.
to learn more about logistical
click here brainly.com/question/29663905
#SPJ11
Who is the Best Law Firm in Lahore?
Answer:
Legal Opinion Law Chambers is a law firm based in Lahore,which specializes in advising family laws i.e Divorce, Child Custody, Maintinance of Children, Recovery Of Dower(Haq Maher),Recovery Of Dowery Articles(Saman Jahez), Court Marriage, Succession Certificate, Legal Heirs Declaration, Civil laws, Criminal laws, as well as Property and Tax issues. Best Lawyers in Lahore especially For Family Laws.
Each of the following states allows for nonpartisan election in the high court of last resort EXCEPT:
a. Michigan.
b. Minnesota.
c. Iowa.
d. Kentucky.
Answer:
I believe the answer is D Kentucky
Explanation:
A collision occurs every
Answer:
A collision occurs every 6 seconds.
A collision occurs every 6 seconds
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court for the first time explicitly adopted the doctrine against prior restraint as constitutional law.
The theory against prior restriction was explicitly adopted as constitutional law by the Supreme Court in a significant case, making it the first time in legal history.
The Supreme Court's adoption of the theory against prior restraint as constitutional law in the relevant case set a significant legal standard in US history. Instead of punishing the speaker after the fact, prior restraint refers to government efforts to suppress or prevent speech before it is voiced.
With the Court's decision in this case, the doctrine was for the first time expressly acknowledged and applied as a key component of free expression. The protection of free speech in the US has been significantly impacted by this ruling, which also served as the basis for numerous later court conflicts involving free speech and censorship.
Learn more about Supreme Court:
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
The correct question will be: What did the Supreme Court adopt the theory against prior restraint?
a antisocialble behavior order is a order That will prevent you from being antisocialble with people and choosing not To Make friends
Answer:
There are types of antisocial behaviors
Explanation:
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD)
Borderline personality disorder (BPD)
Histrionic personality disorder.
Narcissistic personality disorder.
these are just a few
but APD or antisocial personality disorder is a mental health disorder characterized by disregard for other people.
Those with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may begin to show symptoms in childhood, but the condition can't be diagnosed until adolescence or adulthood.
Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to lie, break laws, act impulsively, and lack regard for their own safety or the safety of others. Symptoms may lessen with age.
Which is most often a cause for a change in career or lifestyle?
adjustments in vacation
adjustments in life roles
career satisfaction
lifestyle satisfaction
Answer:
B. Adjustment in life roles.
Explanation:
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
Margaret tells Roy she will give him a new ipad if Roy promises to cut her grass for a month. Roy
promises to do the chores but has not yet begun to do them. Margaret and Roy have formed a(n)
Margaret and Roy have formed a bilateral contract. A bilateral contract is a type of agreement in which both parties make promises to each other.
In this scenario, Margaret promises to give Roy a new iPad, and Roy promises to cut Margaret's grass for a month. Both parties have exchanged promises, creating a mutual obligation to fulfill their respective commitments.
It's worth noting that for a contract to be enforceable, certain elements must be present, such as an offer, acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged between the parties), and the intention to create a legal relationship. In this case, Margaret's offer of a new iPad, Roy's acceptance by promising to do the chores, and the consideration of Roy's grass-cutting service all suggest the formation of a valid bilateral contract.
However, it's important to recognize that the performance of the contract has not yet begun, as Roy has not yet started cutting Margaret's grass. Until the duties under the contract are performed or unless there are specific provisions for termination or cancellation, both parties are bound by their promises and have an obligation to fulfill their respective parts of the agreement.
Learn more about service here:
https://brainly.com/question/30418810
#SPJ11
What percentage of local police departments had equipped their patrol cars with computers by the end of 2002?
19
19
90
90
10
10
9
Answer:
Rom to 200 to 2003 and it increases in 67% to 72%
How can the licensee check if a person is RBS certified?
The licensee can check if a person is RBS certified by using the certification number as well as the server's name to verify.
What is a licensee?A licensee can be referred to business as well as the organization, or individual which is been given legal permission through another entity so they can carry out an activity.
It should be noted that this permission is known as license, and can be given on an express or implied basis.
Hence, Licensees will be used to verify that their servers are RBS certified , The licensee can check if a person is RBS certified by using the certification number as well as the server's name to verify.
Learn more Licensees at:
brainly.com/question/2960292
#SPJ1
Keith lends his car to Jermaine, who drives with two other friends to the home of a marijuana dealer. The three men break into the home, intending to steal a safe full of cash. The drug dealer is unexpectedly at home, however, and in a struggle, Jermaine winds up murdering him. What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you’d be successful prosecuting using this rule
Under the Felony Murder Rule, the local prosecutors can charge Keith with first-degree murder. The rule holds that any death that results from a felony crime makes the offender(s) guilty of murder.
This applies whether the murder was intentional, unintentional, or accidental, so long as the murder occurred during the commission of the felony crime. The prosecution would be successful by prosecuting Keith under the Felony Murder Rule because he lent his car to Jermaine, knowing that they were heading to the home of a marijuana dealer.
Thus, Keith was aware of the criminal intent of his friends to commit a felony crime.Additionally, the three men broke into the drug dealer's house with the intention of stealing a safe full of cash. Jermaine then committed murder while the three were in the commission of the felony crime, and hence, all three are liable for first-degree murder under the Felony Murder Rule.
To know more about prosecutors visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32247597
#SPJ11
The movie FINDING NEMO would fall under which intellectual property category? *
Answer: Copyright
Explanation:
Copyright category of IP Law that protects original works of authorship
- this extends to anything authored including literature, dramas, musicals, paintings, novels, songs, software, architecture, and movies!
hope this helps!
While Roger was on Family and Medical Leave, he was injured and confined to a wheelchair. Does his employer have to accommodate him? Why or why not?
Roger's employer would have to accommodate him despite his disability.
The reason is because under the Americans with disability act, it is a crime to discriminate against people based on their disability.
Why would Roger's employee have to accommodate him with his disability?Yes, Roger's employer has to accommodate him when he returns from Family and Medical Leave. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act , employers are required to make reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities, including those who become disabled while on leave.
A reasonable accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are usually done to help an individual with a disability apply for a job, perform the duties of a job, or enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment. Examples of reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities include changes to the physical workplace, such as installing a ram.p or making changes to a computer or other equipment.
In Roger's case, since he was injured and confined to a wheelchair, his employer may have to make accommodations such as installing a ra.mp or providing a wheelchair-accessible workstation to ensure that he can perform the essential functions of his job.
Read more on disability act here: https://brainly.com/question/27561501
#SPJ1
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
If a female indentured servant became pregnant while still under servitude, the master typically
Question 26 options:
extended her term by two years.
fired her immediately. x
sold her contract to the highest bidder x
did nothing, because pregnancy was considered an inevitable part of life. x
If a female indentured servant became pregnant while still under servitude, the master typically fired her immediately.
During the time when indentured servitude was prevalent, if a female servant became pregnant, it was seen as a breach of the terms of the contract. Pregnancy could disrupt the work and productivity expected from the servant, and it was often seen as a violation of the moral expectations of the time. As a result, the master would typically terminate the female servant's contract and dismiss her from their service. This decision was driven by practical and social considerations, as well as the desire to maintain control over the labor force. The master would then need to find a replacement for the female servant to fulfill the remaining term of the contract or hire a new servant altogether.
To learn more about female indentured servant, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30656036
#SPJ11
How does the media influence criminal justice policy? How does mass media tend to report crime? What types of crime are typically reported, and is this an accurate portrayal of crime in society? What effect does media representation have on public opinions and attitudes about crime?
Answer:
media content is shaped by economic and marketing considerations that override traditional journalistic criteria for news worthiness. This trend is apparent in local and national television's treatment of crime, in which the extent and style of news stories about crime are adjusted to meet perceived and advertising strategies, which frequently emphasize particular demographic groups with a taste for violence. In the case of local television news, this trend results in virtually all channels devoting a disproportionate part of their broadcast to violent crimes, and to many channels adopting a fast-paced, high-crime strategy based on an entertainment model. In the case of network news, this strategy results in much greater coverage of crime,especially murder, with a heavy emphasis on long-running, tabloid style treatment of selected cases in both evening news and news magazines. researchers concluded that the media portrayals of the justice system had changed over the century (1890-1990). They also drew the conclusion that the mass media serves as gatekeepers for coverage on the corrections process through the news as well as prime-time TV shows, which blur the line of fiction and reality.
Explanation:
Maurice Lamont Davis and Andre Levon Glover "committed a string of gas station robberies in Texas." The federal government charged both of them "with multiple counts of robbery affecting interstate commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act" under 18 U.S.C. §1951(a). They were also charged with "one count of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery." The jury found the defendants guilty on most of the counts. The federal government also charged the men under §924(c). Section 924(c)(1)(A) states:
. . . [A]ny person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime . . . for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime—(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years; (ii) if the firearm is brandished, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 7 years; and (iii) if the firearm is discharged, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years.
. . . [A]ny person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime . . . for which the person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, uses or carries a firearm, or who, in furtherance of any such crime, possesses a firearm, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such crime of violence or drug trafficking crime—(i) be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 5 years; (ii) if the firearm is brandished, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 7 years; and (iii) if the firearm is discharged, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years.
Under the section certain weapons also trigger increased penalties. "[T]he government argued that Mr. Davis and Mr. Glover had each committed two separate §924(c) violations by brandishing a short-barreled shotgun in connection with their crimes." The jury agreed with the argument on the additional violations. "Adding the §924(c) mandatory minimums to its discretionary sentences for their other crimes, the district court ultimately sentenced Mr. Glover to more than 41 years in prison and Mr. Davis to more than 50 years."
Assume that Glover and Davis file an appeal in your court.
1. In the U.S. legal system, courts can declare statutes unconstitutional if the statute is vague. Is §924(c)(3) unconstitutionally vague? How would you decide this case? Explain your answer.
2. What problems does it cause when statutes are too vague? Explain your answer.
3. If it is unconstitutionally vague, which branch of government is responsible for correcting it? Explain your answer.
[See United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019).]
1. In the United States legal system, courts can declare statutes unconstitutional if the statute is vague. §924(c)(3) is unconstitutionally vague.
I would decide this case in favor of Glover and Davis.The lower court erred in finding §924(c)(3) to be unconstitutionally vague. However, after careful consideration, the Supreme Court found that §924(c)(3) was unconstitutionally vague because it failed to provide a fair warning of what conduct would be considered a violation of the statute.2. When statutes are too vague, they cause problems in the legal system. One of the problems is that vague statutes are susceptible to arbitrary enforcement, which can result in inconsistent and unpredictable applications. Additionally, vague statutes may not provide adequate notice to individuals about what conduct is prohibited, which can lead to confusion and unjust prosecution.3. If it is unconstitutionally vague, the judicial branch of government is responsible for correcting it. The Supreme Court has the authority to interpret and strike down statutes that it finds to be unconstitutional. The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), is an example of the Court exercising its power to declare a statute unconstitutionally vague and correct the issue.
To know more about government , visit ;
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ11
When did the Republicans and Democrats switch?
During 1824 presidential election, the Democratic-Republicans split. While minority section of Democratic-Republicans later formed nucleus of what became Whig Party, larger faction finally merged into contemporary Democratic Party.
Any change in the political party allegiance of the partisan public figure—typically one who is currently in elected office—is referred to as party switching. So, here between 1860s & 1936, the (Democratic) party of little government transformed into the party of big government, while a (Republican) party of big government vowed to rein in the federal government. Following the 1824 presidential race, the Democratic-Republicans split into Adams' and Andrew Jackson's camps.
To know more about Republicans:
brainly.com/question/12799573
#SPJ4
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
What does a traffic control officer do
Answer:
Summary of Duties: A Traffic Officer patrols an assigned area on foot, bicycle, or in a vehicle to enforce motor vehicle parking regulations; issues warnings or citations for illegal parking by entering information into a hand-held computer; impounds vehicles; and directs vehicular and pedestrian traffic at a specific
Explanation:
Answer:
they control traffic
Explanation:
they tell when the cars go and when the stop
what impact does an anti-price gouging law have on an economic system?
Answer:
Businesses would be willing to pay high freight charges to rush supply to the consumers clamoring for generators and willing to pay inflated prices. Anti-price gouging laws discourage such behavior, leaving the shortage in place. Politicians like anti-price gouging laws because consumers vote and businesses don't.
what is considered the most important counterterrorism law ever passed by congress? the privacy act
The most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress is the USA PATRIOT Act.
The USA PATRIOT Act is a law that was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The full name of the Act is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001."The USA PATRIOT Act is the most important counterterrorism law ever passed by Congress. It significantly expanded the power of law enforcement agencies to investigate and prevent terrorist activities. Some of the key provisions of the Act include Authorization for law enforcement to conduct surveillance of suspected terrorists. Authorization for law enforcement to access business records and other documents. Authorization for law enforcement to use wiretaps and other electronic surveillance measures.
Authorization for law enforcement to detain and deport suspected terrorists. Immunity for law enforcement and private citizens who provide information about suspected terrorists. The USA PATRIOT Act has been controversial, with some critics arguing that it infringes on civil liberties and gives too much power to law enforcement. However, supporters of the Act argue that it is necessary to protect national security and prevent future terrorist attacks.
You can learn more about counterterrorism law at: https://brainly.com/question/509519
#SPJ11
What does a collections agency do when a creditor sells a debt to them?
Answer:The debts will be sold at less than their face value, but the debt purchaser is entitled to collect the full balance. This is where their profit comes from.
2. What year did Jackie Robinson break the color barrier in Major League Baseball?
B) 1957
D) 1937
A) 1927
C) 1947
Answer:
april of 1947
Explanation:
Tom is the recorder for a meeting. Which of the following tasks does his job include?
Answer:
you didnt put the options but recorders write down everything said and done that happens within the court room