Answer:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws
2. to discourage racial mixing
3. to retain public support
Explanation:
The Pearsall Plan, which was a response of the North Carolina to the ruling of the United States Supreme Court on the unconstitutionality of racial segregation in public schools.
Created in 1956, Pearsall Plan sought a moderate approach to mix their public schools, however, in the bid to achieve their goal, the plan gave reason the state (North Carolina) should amend her Constitution, to reach common ground on the issue. The following are the reasons given:
1. to give the legislature the power to pass new laws: this enable the legislature to passed legislation that delay the integration.
2. to discourage racial mixing: there is also amendment of Compulsory School Attendance Law which excused students from going to integrated schools, there by discouraging racial mixing in public schools.
3. to retain public support of school: the plan seek to give more power to the school board which in turn, helps to retain public school supports.
Thereafter, in the case of Godwin v. Johnston County Board of Education (1969), ruled the Pearsall Plan unconstitutional.
1. Why did the size of the Roman Empire cause internal weaknesses?
Explanation: Well, one reason is, since the army was so big to protect the empire, they couldn't keep up with paying all the soldiers taxes. It was too large to control and there were lots of barbaric wars going on thanks to the vastness of the empire. The economy weakened because they didn't have the money to pay the taxes as well. In the end Diocletian (emperor) split the empire to control it better.
Hope this helps! :)
Who was George Eastman
Answer:
American Enterpreneur
Explanation:
George Eastman was an american enterpreneur who founded the Eastman Kodak Company and helped to bring the photographic use of roll film into the mainstream.
What did Louisiana settlers do after a new nation took over the colony in 1763? Check all that apply.
O)They began to take part in illegal trade activities.
O)They led a revolt that became known as the Insurrection of 1768.
O)They petitioned France to take back control of the Louisiana Colony.
O)They voted to elect a Spanish governor to lead the Louisiana Colony.
O)They drove the new governor out of the colony, and he fled to Cuba.
O)They reluctantly accepted new laws and agreed to pay new taxes.
Answer:
2-4-5
Explanation:
write 3 sentences that describe the relationship between the native americans and the colonists of new england
Three statements that describes the relationships between the native Americans and the colonists are:
Mutual HostileTradeWhen the colonists first moved into native American settlements, the natives first attempted to have a mutual and friendly relationship with them.
This failed because with time the settlers wanted the Natives to give up their homes and lands to them. Their continuous expansion angered the colonists. The hostilities led to wars.
The colonists of new England and the natives before they had their conflicts engaged in trades. They traded furs for guns.
Read more on https://brainly.in/question/23653278?referrer=searchResults
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
a.
Houston’s army retreated toward the Colorado River because they no longer thought they should fight Santa Anna’s army for independence.
b.
The citizens of Texas were extremely fearful of Santa Anna and his army after hearing about the events at the Alamo.
c.
Santa Anna’s identity was revealed at San Jacinto, in part, because the Texan soldiers heard his men call him “El Presidente.”
d.
The Mexican casualties were much greater than the Texan casualties in the Battle at San Jacinto.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Who was Osama bin Laden
Answer:
Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian-born militant and founder of the pan-Islamic militant organization Al-Qaeda. The group is designated as a terrorist group by the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, and various other countries.
Was Pope Urban II correct for calling a crusade?
Answer:
yes he is correct
Explanation:
Arrange sequentially the following events by writing letters A-J on the blank.
1. Emergence of liberal ideas
2. The ratification of the Education Decree in 1863
3. Formulation of the Constitution of Cortes in 1812
4. Manila was fully opened to international trading in 1834.
5. Cebu port was opened in 1835.
6. A decree was issued that partially opened Manila to international trading in 1785.
7. The opening of Suez Canal in 1869
8. Foreign trading centers started the business in the country in 1809.
9. The emergence of middle-class in Philippine society
10. All foreigners were allow to established a business in the country in 1814.
Answer:
Arranged sequentially as you had requested:
Formulation of the Constitution of Cortes in 1812All foreigners were allowed to establish a business in the country in 1814.Foreign trading centers started the business in the country in 1809.A decree was issued that partially opened Manila to international trading in 1785.Manila was fully opened to international trading in 1834.Cebu port was opened in 1835.The ratification of the Education Decree in 1863The opening of Suez Canal in 1869Emergence of liberal ideasThe emergence of middle-class in Philippine societyA. What’s different when there are elections for U.S. Congress? Candidates for the Senate and House of Representatives have a smaller audience for the campaigns, since they are elected by districts within a specific state. Congress also goes back to work earlier than the President. How do the processes compare? Using this information and what you learned in the lesson, complete the Venn diagram with the letters from the list.
Answer: a meal
Explanation:
Select the answer that best describes what an opportunity cost is:
Question 2 options:
The amount of money you put into savings each year
The trade-off of making one choice and giving up a different choice
The money you earn when choosing one option versus another
The amount of money a business makes every year from sales
Answer:the answers should be A and D
Explanation:
Expressing an educated opinion, why do you think Carlisle Industrial School could exist 150 years ago but would not be established in 2023?
Please help!
Carlisle Indian Industrial School was a boarding school for Native American children that operated from 1879 to 1918. It was established as part of the U.S. government's policy of assimilation, which aimed to "civilize" Native Americans by erasing their cultural traditions and forcing them to adopt Western ways of life.
In my educated opinion, I believe that Carlisle Industrial School could not exist in 2023 because of the significant changes that have occurred in our understanding of human rights and cultural diversity. The concept of assimilation is now seen as a violation of human rights, and the idea of erasing cultural traditions is viewed as a form of cultural genocide. Furthermore, there is now a greater recognition of the value of cultural diversity and the importance of preserving and respecting different cultural traditions.
In addition, there is now a greater awareness and appreciation of the importance of preserving the rights and dignity of marginalized groups, including Indigenous peoples. The legacy of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School and other similar institutions has been widely condemned as a form of cultural oppression and abuse, and there is now a greater recognition of the need to address historical injustices and promote reconciliation.
Overall, the existence of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School was a product of a historical context that is vastly different from our current understanding of cultural diversity and human rights. While the school played a significant role in the history of the United States, it would not be established in 2023 due to the significant changes in our societal values and understanding of cultural diversity and human rights.
It is essential to the freedom and security of a free people, that no taxes be imposed upon them but by their own consent, or their representatives.
—The Sons of Liberty, address to the public, New York, December 15, 1773
The excerpt above reflects the dissatisfaction of American colonists with the —
F economic consequences of the Great Awakening
G political debates that took place at the Albany Convention
H economic policies imposed by Great Britain following the French and Indian War
J interference of Great Britain in the slave trade
Answer:
i think maybe f im not positive tho sorry hoped it helped tho
Explanation:
The Southern States did not
like tariffs (taxes on imported
products) or internal
improvements because _______
A. they did not need imported products
B. they had to pay more for imported
products
C. they were old-fashioned in their beliefs
Answer:
B I think because the Southern States were not very wealthy.
Plss Help
WILL GIVE OUT BRAINLIEST
In 2013, more goods from other countries passed through the Port of Houston than through any other port in the United States. Two out of every three container ships on the Gulf Coast docked at Houston. The value of items imported and exported through the Port of Houston was greater than through any other port in the United States, except Long Beach, in California, and New York City.
Which conclusion is supported by the paragraph above?
The Port of Houston imports more goods than it exports.
The Port of Houston has failed to update its facilities for container ships.
Imports and exports at the Port of Houston contribute to global interdependence.
Foreign shippers prefer to use the Port of Houston to avoid restrictions on imports.
Answer: Foreign shippers prefer to use the Port of Houston to avoid restrictions on imports.
Explanation: None of the other answers are supported by the paragraph making this the most reliable answer.
These people supported the British during the American Revolution.
Patriots
Loyalists
Sons of Liberty
The Continental Congress
Answer: Loyalists
Explanation:
Loyalists were American colonists who remained loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often referred to as Tories, Royalists or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the Patriots, who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America."[1]
Prominent Loyalists repeatedly assured the British government that many thousands of them would spring to arms and fight for the crown. The British government acted in expectation of that, especially in the southern campaigns in 1780–81. Britain was able to effectively protect the people only in areas where they had military control, and in return, the number of military Loyalists was significantly lower than what had been expected. Due to the conflicting political views, loyalists were often under suspicion of those in the British military, who did not know whom they could fully trust in such a conflicted situation; they were often looked down upon.[2]
Patriots watched suspected Loyalists very closely and would not tolerate any organized Loyalist opposition. Many outspoken or militarily active Loyalists were forced to flee, especially to their stronghold of New York City. William Franklin, the royal governor of New Jersey and son of Patriot leader Benjamin Franklin, became the leader of the Loyalists after his release from a Patriot prison in 1778. He worked to build Loyalist military units to fight in the war. Woodrow Wilson wrote that "there had been no less than twenty-five thousand loyalists enlisted in the British service during the five years of the fighting. At one time (1779) they had actually outnumbered the whole of the continental muster under the personal command of Washington."[3]
When their cause was defeated, about 15 percent of the Loyalists (65,000–70,000 people) fled to other parts of the British Empire, to Britain itself, or to British North America (now Canada).[4] The southern Loyalists moved mostly to Florida, which had remained loyal to the Crown, and to British Caribbean possessions. Northern Loyalists largely migrated to Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. They called themselves United Empire Loyalists. Most were compensated with Canadian land or British cash distributed through formal claims procedures. Loyalists who left the US received over £3 million or about 37% of their losses from the British government. Loyalists who stayed in the US were generally able to retain their property and become American citizens.[5] Many Loyalists eventually returned to the US after the war and discriminatory laws had been repealed.[6] Historians have estimated that between 15 and 20% of the 2,000,000 whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists (300,000–400,000).[7]
#SPJ1
Identify two of King's achievements that contributed to his winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
Support your answer with evidence from the text.
Answer:
SOOOO LONG TIME AGO AND STILL NO 1 ANSWERED
Explanation:
If a researcher wanted to gather quantitative data on a business, which question would be best it ask
c
quantitative data is based off of numbers, so c would be the correct answer! hope that helps
Athens and Sparta were two important Greek city-states. However, these city-states were very different. Which city would you rather call home? A travel company is looking to create a brochure about ancient Athens or Sparta and it needs your help. You must create a travel brochure for the city you call home. You must describe what makes the city such a great place, what tourists should do on their trip, and how they can be prepared for visiting the city.
Step 1: Choose Your Home City
Athens
Sparta
Step 2: Create Your Travel Brochure
Your travel brochure must:
be at least three paragraphs
describe what tourists need to know about the city’s history
describe what places in the city tourists must visit
describe what tourists should wear
describe what tourists should eat
include three images or drawings that show aspects of the city’s culture
Geography plays a critical role in shaping civilizations, and this is particularly true of ancient Greece.
The Greek peninsula has two distinctive geographic features that influenced the development of Greek society. First, Greece has easy access to water. The land contains countless scattered islands, deep harbors, and a network of small rivers. This easy access to water meant that the Greek people might naturally become explorers and traders.
Second, Greece's mountainous terrain led to the development of the polis (city-state), beginning about 750 B.C.E. The high mountains made it very difficult for people to travel or communicate. Therefore, each polis developed independently and, often, very differently from one another. Eventually, the polis became the structure by which people organized themselves. Athens and Sparta are two good examples of city-states that contrasted greatly with each other.
Athens: The Think Tank
Athenian women
Life was not easy for Athenian women. They did not enjoy the same rights or privileges as males, being nearly as low as slaves in the social system.
The city-state of Athens was the birthplace of many significant ideas. Ancient Athenians were a thoughtful people who enjoyed the systematic study of subjects such as science, philosophy, and history, to name a few.
Athenians placed a heavy emphasis on the arts, architecture, and literature. The Athenians built thousands of temples and statues that embodied their understanding of beauty. Today the term "classical" is used to describe their enduring style of art and architecture.
Athenians also enjoyed a democratic form of government in which some of the people shared power.
Sparta: Military Might
Life in Sparta was vastly different from life in Athens. Located in the southern part of Greece on the Peloponnisos peninsula, the city-state of Sparta developed a militaristic society ruled by two kings and an oligarchy, or small group that exercised political control.
Ares, Greek god of war
Ares Borghese, 420 B.C.E. Photo © Maicar Förlag — GML
Ares, the Greek god of war, was a particularly fitting patron for Sparta, which was known to be a rather warlike society. When they weren't fighting another city-state, Spartans were honing their military skills in preparation for the next battle.
Early in their history, a violent and bloody slave revolt caused the Spartans to change their society. A Spartan, Lycurgus, drafted a harsh set of laws that required total dedication to the state from its people. The laws' goal was to train citizens to become hardened soldiers so that they could fight off potential enemies or slave revolts. The result was a rigid lifestyle unlike any seen in Greece at the time. The devotion of Spartans to developing a military state left little time for the arts or literature.
A Spartan baby had to be hardy and healthy. To test a baby's strength, parents would leave their child on a mountain overnight to see if it could survive on its own until the next morning. By age seven, Spartan boys were taken from their families and underwent severe military training. They wore uniforms at all times, ate small meals of bland foods, exercised barefoot to toughen their feet, and were punished severely for disobedient behavior. Boys lived away from their families in barracks until the age of 30, even after they were married. Men were expected to be ready to serve in the army until they were 60 years old.
Women, too, were expected to be loyal and dedicated to the state. Like men, women followed a strict exercise program and contributed actively to Spartan society. Although they were not allowed to vote, Spartan women typically had more rights and independence than women in other Greek city-states.
Winning by Losing
The differences between Athens and Sparta eventually led to war between the two city-states. Known as the Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.E.), both Sparta and Athens gathered allies and fought on and off for decades because no single city-state was strong enough to conquer the others.
With war came famine, plague, death, and misfortune. But war cannot kill ideas. Despite the eventual military surrender of Athens, Athenian thought spread throughout the region. After temporary setbacks, these notions only became more widely accepted and developed with the passing centuries.
↓What are three ways that God speaks to us today?↓
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Words We Hear
The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).
When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.
2. Pictures We See
The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.
At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).
When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.
Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)
Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).
3. Emotions We Feel
Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.
So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.
One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.
So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.
What are some important outcomes of the War of 1812?
The United States decided to get involved in European affairs and all American ports were closed to trade.
France and other European countries lost their respect for the United States and the United States gained a lot of territory west of the Rockies.
The United States became more respected and Americans were proud of their country.
Britain remained hopeful it would some day retake its former colonies and Americans kept their sights on Canada for colonization.
Answer:
One indirect result of the War of 1812 was the later election to the presidency of the war heroes Andrew Jackson and later William Henry Harrison. Both men won military fame, which had much to do with their election victories. Another indirect result was the decline of the power of the Federalist Party. What are the three outcomes of the War of 1812?
American armies invaded Canada in 1812 at three points, but all three campaigns ended in failure. One army surrendered at Detroit at the western end of Lake Erie, a second army surrendered at Queenston Heights at the other end of the lake, and a third army withdrew after little more than a skirmish north of New York.
Explanation:
Please hurry help me
In a previous unit, you learned that two lines of Hebrew poetry can follow either a synonymous, synthetic, antithetical, emblematic, or climactic form of parallelism. Use your Bible to identify which type of parallel form is used in the following verses of Psalm 22. You may wish to refer to Unit 6, The Psalms, for help with this activity.
Read Psalm 22:13. Identify the type of parallel form that is used.
Emblematic
Synthetic
Antithetical
Synonymous
15 PINTS HURRT PLSSS
hi! we're doing a mock interview with people from the american revolution (im doing penelope barker) and i need help coming up with questions. thanks :-D
Answer: Ask questions like: What did you find the hardest in life and how did you overcome that, What or who encouraged you to help people, How did you become world renowned, and what do you think will happen to you ounce you are gone, Do you think people will still remember you or do you think hey will forget you?
Hope this helped :)
Explanation:
In "The Road Not Taken" What does the author mean by "Ages and Ages Hence" ??
Answer:
The author meant" When I'm old and telling stories about my past"
Which of the following are true of the Northeast tribes?
became Christians
protected their homes with palisades
held ceremonial potlatches
published their own newspaper
Answer:
rlly dude this is multiple choice so i think its seafood since they on coast so they prob had a lot of food from the sea and either held ceremonials or carved totem poles
Explanation:
Justifiable for the United State to drop the atomic bombs on Japan?
Answer:
While some argue that the use of atomic bombs was necessary to end the war quickly and save lives, others believe that it was a disproportionate and unnecessary act of violence that caused immense human suffering. The debate over the justification of the bombings continues to this day.
Explanation:
Answer:
The United States dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not justifiable, since history has proven many times over that solving long term issues through violence will only most likely result in one of two solutions. The anger against each side lasts for at least as long as the issue was around. Or the other, it will be 'solved' for a short time, and even then will it only come back to more disagreements among the people, causing more violence, or better, just verbal debates and disagreements, although that rarely happens in large issues among nations.
When the US dropped the bombs, they were expecting a quick surrender of Japan, although it would have been better with less violence, talking it out, or even a smaller-range bomb, that wouldn't kill so much of the population and destroy so much land. The United States dropped the bomb for a personal benefit of a lower amount of American lives lost, contradicting the idea amongst most people to preserve all human life, and prevent death from occurring as much as possible. The action was personally considered an 'allegation', not legally, among many people; many others believe that it was necessary and justifiable. It would be difficult to gainsay others opinions on this matter, although you can certainly attempt to proselytize.
Partial Rebuttal for a more beneficial answer:
After dropping the first bomb, Japan had still not surrendered, enticing the United States to repeat the action. To have two bombs dropped on your own country after being warned would most likely make you want to surrender or obey the warring nation. In the end, it turned out to be a gain for the United States, and a great loss for Japan, basically the overall idea of the people of the United States.
Please be Correct Paragraph 1: • should contain an introduction that introduces the topic • should acknowledge that some people claim Asia made more contributions to society and some people claim that Africa made more contributions to society Paragraph 2: • should contain your claim that either Asia or Africa made more contributions to society • should include at least two pieces of evidence or reasons to support your claim • should also include one counter claim and give a reason or show evidence why the other society did not make more contributions than your chosen society Paragraph 3: • should contain your conclusion • should review your reasons or evidence and ask the reader to support your claim
first add a question to it then wirt s ycthi g like food any topic you are forced on
Please help this is due soon !!! FORWHOEVER DOES ALL THREE DONE GETS BRAIN LIEST !!! :D plz help
Answer:
merry christmas
Explanation:
Use the maps below to answer the following question.
Based on the maps, which state listed below was located in the Southwest Native American cultural region?
New Mexico
Florida
Ohio
North Dakota
Answer:
The answer is New Mexico.
Explanation:
The first map shows the main Native American cultural regions in the United States, including the Southwest region. The second map specifically highlights the states that were part of the Southwest region, which includes Arizona, New Mexico, part of Utah, and part of Colorado.
The options are:
New Mexico - Correct. The map shows New Mexico as part of the Southwest region.
Florida - Incorrect. Florida is not shown as part of the Southwest region.
Ohio - Incorrect. Ohio is not shown as part of the Southwest region.
North Dakota - Incorrect. North Dakota is not shown as part of the Southwest region.
Therefore, based on the maps provided, New Mexico was located in the Southwest Native American cultural region.
3. Write a two sentence summary of Paragraph 2 in your own words.
Parapgraph2: "Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation can long endure (undergo). We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who gave their lives that the nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this."
Answer:
Within this paragraph we are able to see that during the great civil war those who had fallen were given a place on the field. We are also able to see that as a nation we recognise the fallen and pay respect for what they did during the war.