According to the Preamble, the Constitution was intended to (select all that apply).
provide for the common defense
establish justice
limit the power of government
promote general welfare

The law that sets limits on how much presidential and vice presidential candidates and their families can donate to their own campaigns is the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) of 1971, as amended.

This legislation governs the financing of federal elections in the United States, including the rules for contributions and spending by candidates and their families. FECA aims to increase transparency and prevent corruption by regulating the flow of money in political campaigns. Specifically, it sets a limit on individual contributions to a candidate's campaign per election cycle, including self-financing by the candidates and their families.

The current limit for personal contributions is $2,800 per election, which applies to both primary and general elections, for a total of $5,600. It is important to note that these contribution limits are subject to adjustment for inflation and may change over time.

To know more about Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30240161#

#SPJ11

Answer:

2 thirds or 2/3

Explanation:

brainliest please?

Answer:

"I shot him because he assaulted me and I felt threatened" Make sure to put the answer in quotations

Explanation:

His claim of self-defense is likely to be "I shot him because he assaulted

me and I felt threatened because he pushed me to the ground"

This is a countermeasure which involves individuals protecting

themselves against harm.

Alfonso was assaulted and felt threatened which was why he acted in self-

defense by shooting George.

Read more about Self-defense here https://brainly.com/question/2920735

The policy-making bodies responsible for U.S. fiscal policy are:

The U.S. President:

Congress

The Federal Reserve Bank

The U.S. President: The President plays a significant role in shaping and proposing fiscal policy. They work with their administration and advisors to develop budget proposals, tax policies, and spending priorities, which are then presented to Congress.

Congress: As the legislative body of the U.S. government, Congress holds the primary responsibility for fiscal policy. It has the authority to pass laws related to taxation, spending, and the federal budget. Congress debates and approves budget resolutions, appropriations bills, and tax legislation, which directly impact fiscal policy.

The Federal Reserve Bank: While the Federal Reserve (commonly referred to as the Fed) is responsible for monetary policy in the United States, it does not directly determine fiscal policy. The Federal Reserve focuses on managing interest rates, money supply, and financial stability. However, its actions can have an indirect impact on fiscal policy through its influence on the economy.

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are international financial institutions that provide assistance and support to countries worldwide, but they are not directly responsible for U.S. fiscal policy. Their role primarily revolves around global economic development, financial stability, and lending to countries in need.

Learn more about fiscal policy here:

https://brainly.com/question/29790045

#SPJ11

Answer:

responsibility are duties to fulfill.

if you are asking question from social studies this is the answer.

Answer:

c tell a teacher

Explanation:

tell the teacher so that way the teacher can put an end to it and contact the family

Answer:

C and other.

Explanation:

If you tell a trusted adult, they could help you. Also, you could stand up for whoever is getting bullied. On a question on brainly, I'm standing for this kid.

Please give me brainliest!!!!

Most countries use a civil law system, as opposed to the common law system used in the United States.

The civil law system is the most widely used legal system in the world, adopted by many countries across Europe, Latin America, and parts of Asia and Africa.

While both civil law and common law systems aim to administer justice, they differ in their approach to legal reasoning, sources of law, and the role of judicial precedents in decision-making.

For more questions on civil law

https://brainly.com/question/14529086

#SPJ8

Answer: the statute depends upon the state you live in.

The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.

The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.

As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.

To learn more about Indonesia, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31792781

#SPJ4

Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.

In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.

Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.

To know more about law:

brainly.com/question/30133385

#SPJ4

In order to determine whether King's conclusion is rhetorically effective, it would be necessary to analyze the specific content and structure of the conclusion.

Rhetorical effectiveness refers to the ability of a speech or piece of writing to achieve its intended purpose and impact the audience.

A rhetorically effective conclusion typically restates the main points of the argument in a concise and memorable way, while also leaving a lasting impression on the audience. It should reinforce the central message of the speech or writing and provide a sense of closure. Additionally, an effective conclusion may employ rhetorical devices such as repetition, parallelism, or emotional appeals to engage and persuade the audience.

To assess the rhetorical effectiveness of King's conclusion, it would be helpful to consider factors such as the clarity and impact of the closing statements, the ability to inspire or evoke emotion, the use of persuasive language, and the overall cohesiveness with the rest of the speech. Without the specific text or context of King's conclusion, it is difficult to provide a detailed analysis.

Learn more about Rhetorical

https://brainly.com/question/183948

#SPJ11

The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.

Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?

After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.

What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?

Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.

Learn more about banking here:

https://brainly.com/question/25642105

#SPJ4

Answer:

Option B (EMACs) is the correct choice.

Explanation:

Other examples offered are not relevant to either the theory in question. So that the option described will be the right one.

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.

Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta  etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.

Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.

A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.

Conservatives have been critical of the Court Challenges Program because they see it as a waste of government resources and a way for special interest groups to challenge laws and policies that they don't agree with.

They argue that the program unfairly targets their values and beliefs, and that it should not receive public funding. According to conservatives, the program is used by special interest groups to fund their legal challenges, which often target conservative policies. As a result, they see it as a way for left-leaning groups to push their agendas and undermine the democratic process.

Conservatives also argue that the program is expensive, with some estimates suggesting that it costs taxpayers millions of dollars each year. They contend that this money could be better spent on more pressing issues, such as health care, education, and infrastructure.

Learn more about Conservatives

https://brainly.com/question/2261035

#SPJ11

Based on the available options and the situation described, the truth of the case is that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.

The offense of Concealment is a term that is used to describe the offense committed with direct or indirect intent.

Generally, the concealer must know at the moment of committing the deed, in any of the normative ways, that the good comes from committing a deed provided by criminal law.

Therefore, in this case, since it is revealed that Shawn did not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings and was later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings, or will be concluded that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A.

Learn more about the Offense of Concealment here: https://brainly.com/question/30033867

#SPJ1

Answer:

which organ is responsible in dealing with constitional disputes?

RICO stands for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a federal legislation in the United States that stipulates harsher punishments for crimes committed as part of a continuing criminal organization as well as a civil cause of action.

The term "RICO" relates to state and federal statutes that are applied to impose felony and civil penalties on ongoing criminal organizations. Although it is not widely known, RICO lawsuits are occasionally made against honest companies that commit repeated fraud.

To know more about RICO visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3656012

#SPJ4

Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.

Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.

In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.

Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.

Learn more about Evidence, here:

https://brainly.com/question/14370298

#SPJ2

The University of California Los Angeles maintains a police force of over 60 sworn officers.

The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) has 64 sworn police officers who are joined by 40 full-time civilian department members. Together they try to maintain campus safety through crime prevention and education programs. They are also responsible in maintaining law and order.

The University of California Police Department or UCPD shares a partnership with the CARE. It is Campus Assault Resources and Education program. CARE is a safe place for survivors of sexual assault and help in maintaining discipline in the university. It also promotes safety awareness about recent activities through community outreach programs.

To know more about University of California here

https://brainly.com/question/16551247

#SPJ1

The types of payments employers would have to make if they were found liable in a class-action lawsuit in favour of their gig workers would vary, depending on the specific employment terms it violated.

The employer could be responsible for calculating and paying back wages for the hours worked, since typically gig workers are paid “by the job” or project completion without taking accrued vacation time or overtime into account.

They might be on the hook for unpaid overtime or vacation pay, as well as for other entitlements such as holiday pay, employer-paid contributions to pension plans, and medical and/or dental benefits. If the employer had been in violation of health and safety laws, they could also be out of pocket for medical expenses, as well as for any damages suffered by the employee, such as pain and suffering or loss of income.

To know more about employment , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17459074

#SPJ4

Answer:

A. injury and at the time of the suit.

Explanation:

A corporation can be defined as a corporate organization that has facilities and owns or controls assets used for the production of goods and services in at least one country other than its headquarter (home office) located in its home country.

This ultimately implies that, a corporation is a corporate organization that owns or controls its business in two or more countries.

One of the advantage of a corporation is that, owners have limited liability for debt to the extent to which they have invested and as such are not personally liable for some of the debt owed by corporation.

A derivative suit can be defined as a lawsuit that's brought forward by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation, to either defend or enforce a legal right (claim) against a third party such as a director or executive officer in the corporation.

Hence, to bring a derivative suit to a court of competent jurisdiction, a shareholder must own stock at the time of the injury and at the time of the suit.

Answer:

v

Explanation:

h

Answer: d. All of the above

Explanation:

Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.

Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.

Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.

Answer:

Within 30 days.

Explanation:

If you have been punished or discriminated against for using your rights, you must file a complaint with OSHA within 30 days of the alleged reprisal for most complaints.

may I have Brainliest? =3

The time limit to file a complaint with OSHA for punishment or discrimination related to the exercise of rights is typically 30 days from the date of the alleged violation. It is important to act promptly within this timeframe to ensure timely submission of the complaint.

OSHA stands for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a federal agency in the United States responsible for ensuring safe and healthy working conditions for employees.

OSHA's primary role is to enforce workplace safety standards and regulations, investigate complaints, and provide guidance and training to employers and employees.

In cases where individuals have experienced punishment or discrimination for exercising their rights, OSHA provides a mechanism to file a complaint within a 30-day timeframe.

OSHA plays a crucial role in safeguarding worker rights and promoting a safe working environment across various industries.

Learn more about OSHA here:

https://brainly.com/question/29887530

#SPJ6

Answer: It is False!!

Explanation:

That is the correct answer on pearson

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.