According to the video, what qualities are needed by Elementary School Teachers? Check all that apply. awareness of national politics communication skills sensitivity to cultural backgrounds playfulness discipline humor patience

Answer:

Restrained

Explanation:

Answer:

Difference between the standing committee and technical committee of SAARC​ is described below in brief details.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Openness and personal confession are related to sharing personal information or experiences, but they have some key differences.Openness refers to a general willingness to share personal thoughts, feelings, and experiences with others. It involves being transparent and authentic in interpersonal interactions, and can be seen as a positive trait that fosters trust and connection with others.Personal confession, on the other hand, typically refers to sharing a specific wrongdoing or mistake with others. It often involves admitting fault or taking responsibility for one's actions, and can be motivated by a desire for forgiveness, accountability, or catharsis.While both openness and personal confession involve sharing personal information, personal confession is more specific and focused on a particular act or event. Openness, on the other hand, can encompass a wider range of personal experiences and emotions, and is often seen as a more general character trait.Overall, both openness and personal confession can be important for building meaningful relationships and fostering personal growth and development, but they involve different types of disclosure and serve different purposes.

The  General Staff member that  directs all responses and tactical actions to achieve the incident objectives is: A. Operations Division Director.

An operations Division Director can be defined as the person whose duty is to manage the day to day  operation of a business.

The Director of Operations tend to supervise or oversee all the tactical operation of the company in which they  work for  and they as well ensures that the goals and objectives of the company is achieved.

Therefore we can conclude that the correct option is A.

Learn more about Operations Division Director here:https://brainly.com/question/6369558

#SPJ1

Answer:

Police in a city decide that they want to host a "Coffee with a Cop" program that allows citizens to come talk to police about their jobs and concerns they have.

The Supreme Court has not recognized checking an identity as an exigent circumstance.

Exigent circumstances refer to situations where law enforcement officers are allowed to bypass the usual requirement of obtaining a warrant before conducting a search or seizure.

The Supreme Court has recognized certain circumstances as exigent, including preventing an escape, rendering immediate aid to a person in need of assistance, and preventing destruction of evidence. However, checking an identity has not been specifically recognized as an exigent circumstance by the Supreme Court.

Exigent circumstances are exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement officers to take action without obtaining a warrant in certain situations. The Supreme Court has established a few recognized exigent circumstances, such as preventing an escape, rendering immediate aid to someone in need, and preventing the destruction of evidence

These exceptions are based on the need for immediate action to protect public safety or prevent the loss of crucial evidence. However, checking an identity alone has not been explicitly recognized as an exigent circumstance by the Supreme Court.

Learn more about Exigent circumstances

brainly.com/question/30611978

#SPJ11

The law that holds the medical professional not legally liable when rendering first aid in an emergency situation is called Good Samaritan laws.

Good Samaritan laws are based on the notion that it is in the interests of "public policy" that those who voluntarily provide care and rescue in an emergency be exempt from liability.

To learn more about : Good Samaritan laws

Ref : https://brainly.com/question/13160856

#SPJ4

Young African-Americans criticized the traditional civil rights organizations for paying too much attention to legal segregation. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.

People have historically been segregated based on their race, gender, or both. Segregation denotes the physical segregation of individuals in daily life, the workplace, and the exercise of civil rights. The Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education (Brown I), which was published on May 17, 1954, that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment even if it was asserted that the services provided there were of the "same quality."

While the Brown I decision did not outline or identify a specific strategy for eliminating racial segregation in schools, the Brown II decision from the Supreme Court in 1955 required states to desegregate "with all deliberate haste."

Learn more about legal segregation, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8680000

#SPJ1

Answer:

what i don't understand that question

Answer:  it was destruction of another persons property which means he committed a mister-miner crime which means he would have to fix the vacuum cleaner or give his friend a new vacuum cleaner

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The three "real requirements" for getting nominated as a federal judge are experience, most qualified, and can get confirmed. While age and political affiliation may be factors considered by the president, they are not official requirements.

Additionally, having bar association approval can be helpful in the nomination process, but it is not a requirement. Ultimately, the nominee must be deemed highly qualified and able to gain confirmation from the Senate.

The three "real requirements" for getting nominated as a federal judge are: agrees with the president, can get confirmed, and has bar association approval.

These factors are important in the nomination process, as the president wants to ensure the nominee aligns with their views, can successfully pass confirmation hearings, and possesses the necessary credentials and professional standing.

The three "real requirements" for getting nominated as a federal judge are as follows:1. Legal Education: An individual should have at least a Juris Doctorate (JD) degree in Law or similar degrees from accredited institutions. A Juris Doctorate is considered the minimum legal education required for a federal judgeship.2. Professional Experience: An individual must have relevant professional experience in law, which involves good standing with the bar, working as a prosecutor or defense attorney, having legal experience, and demonstrated knowledge of law.

For example, the American Bar Association considers a minimum of 12 years of litigation experience to be a "highly qualified" rating for judges.3. Political Affiliations: Federal judges must be affiliated with the President's political party. The President nominates and the Senate approves federal judges, and they generally must have the same political views as the President who appointed them. Federal judges are nominated by the President, but their appointment is subject to the Senate's approval. So, the Senate has to confirm the appointment, which includes a hearing, followed by a full Senate vote. A Senate majority is required to confirm the nomination.

To know more about Federal judges visit-

brainly.com/question/31448478

#SPJ11

(b) Characteristics of a legally acceptable ID: (1) Issued by a government agency; (2) Contains the name, date of birth, photograph, and physical description of the ID holder; and (3) A valid expiration date.

The legally acceptable ID has characteristics as issued by a government agency.

For official purposes, the most trustworthy and commonly recognized kind of identification is one that has been issued by the government. When confirming a person's identification, these IDs often carry a lot of weight and trust.

Government-issued identification documents sometimes have security holograms, one-of-a-kind serial numbers, official seals or emblems, and other components that make them challenging to copy or fabricate.

Learn more about identification, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29637546

#SPJ6

According to Blackmun's decision, the crèche display violate the establishment clause because it was located inside a county building.

They argued that the presentations violated the primary change's status quo Clause, which says “Congress shall make no law respecting an established order of religion…” The established order Clause changed intended to prevent the government from establishing a national church, or from interfering in the political opinions of church buildings.

The establishment clause prohibits the government from "organizing" a faith. An appropriate definition of "establishment" is doubtful. Historically, it was supposed to prohibit country-backed church buildings, such as the Church of England.

Learn more about the establishment clause here https://brainly.com/question/14225350

#SPJ4

Answer: The Legislative branch

Explanation: Just trust me bro

Answer: The answer is:

B: the legislative branch.

Explanation:

Edge 2023

Hope :}

Don't trust random people on the internet.

Some examples of how Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. code protects a suspect include enabling them to sue an officer for misconduct (B). The statute does not limit physical force an officer can use, require probable cause for arrest, or mandate police to only arrest people with a warrant. So, option B. is the right choice.

Section 1983 of Title 42 of the U.S. code was enacted in 1871 to protect against misconduct on the part of police. It provides individuals with the right to sue government officials, including police officers, for violating their constitutional rights.

Some examples of how the statute protects a suspect include enabling them to sue an officer for misconduct (B). This means that if a police officer violates an individual's constitutional rights, such as using excessive force during an arrest or conducting an unlawful search, the individual can file a lawsuit against the officer.

The statute does not limit the amount of physical force an officer can use when arresting someone (A). However, officers are required to use only reasonable force to effect an arrest and may not use excessive force.

Section 1983 also does not require officers to have probable cause to make an arrest (C). However, officers must have a reasonable suspicion that an individual has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime in order to make an arrest.

Finally, the statute does not mandate that police can only arrest people with a warrant (D). Officers can make an arrest without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe that an individual has committed a crime in their presence or has a warrant out for their arrest.

Overall, Section 1983 is an important tool for protecting individuals from police misconduct and ensuring that law enforcement officials are held accountable for their actions.

The right answer is B .By enabling a suspect to sue an officer for misconduct.

For more such question on Section 1983

https://brainly.com/question/30580335

#SPJ8

Answer:

doctrine of preemption

Explanation:

Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.Jun 2, 2017

"Supremacy Clause" constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws. Correct option is a.

The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and it states:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that there is uniformity in the application and enforcement of federal laws across all states and prevents conflicts or inconsistencies between state and federal regulations.

To know more about constitutional:

https://brainly.com/question/4555568

#SPJ6

Public policy process is the procedure of developing and implementing laws, regulations, and courses of action for the well-being of society. Political interference is an external factor that can impact the public policy process. Political interference can hinder the decision-making process and may undermine the objectivity of public policy.

In this context, the following measures can be taken to moderate political interference in the public policy process:

Establishment of an Independent Oversight Body: To monitor the public policy process and ensure that political interference does not impact the decision-making process, an independent oversight body can be established. The oversight body must be independent and free from any political affiliations.

Establishment of Clear Guidelines and Regulations: Clear guidelines and regulations must be established to ensure that political interference is reduced to a minimum. These guidelines must ensure that the public policy process is objective and transparent. Developing the Capacity of Public Servants: Developing the capacity of public servants will help ensure that they are better equipped to manage political interference and maintain the integrity of the public policy process.

This can be achieved through training and education, which will help build the capacity of public servants to resist political interference. Establishment of a Public Engagement Mechanism: To moderate political interference, it is essential to establish a public engagement mechanism. Public participation can help ensure that the public policy process is transparent and accountable. This will also reduce the risk of political interference.

To know more about Public policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30137681

#SPJ11

Answer:

long out statuses

Explanation:

The federal government imposes regulations on money given to state governments to ensure that the money is used for the purpose for which it was given.

They also impose regulations to ensure that the money is spent in accordance with federal laws and policies and that the states do not misuse the funds or use them for their own purposes.The federal government is responsible for providing financial support to the states in various forms. One of these forms is grants-in-aid, which are financial transfers from the federal government to the states for specific purposes. The federal government imposes regulations on the money given to state governments to ensure that the money is used for the purpose for which it was given.The federal government provides financial assistance to the states to carry out their programs and policies. The federal government provides grants-in-aid to the states, which are financial transfers from the federal government to the states for specific purposes. The states use these funds to carry out programs that are consistent with federal policies and laws.The federal government imposes regulations on the money given to state governments to ensure that the money is spent in accordance with federal laws and policies. The regulations are in place to ensure that the states do not misuse the funds or use them for their own purposes. The federal government has the authority to oversee the use of the funds and ensure that the states comply with the regulations.In conclusion, the federal government imposes regulations on money given to state governments to ensure that the funds are used for their intended purpose and in accordance with federal laws and policies. This helps to prevent misuse of the funds and ensures that the states comply with the regulations. The federal government has the authority to oversee the use of the funds and ensure that the states comply with the regulations.

To Know More about accordance visit:

brainly.com/question/28741211

#SPJ11

Answer:

lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.

Explanation:

"Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act" has been the most important in encouraging groups and individuals to convert their grievances into questions of rights and the deprivation of those rights by prohibiting employment discrimination.

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, a landmark legislation in the United States, has played a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of civil rights and empowering marginalized communities. By prohibiting employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin, Title VII has provided individuals and groups with a legal framework to challenge injustices and advocate for their rights.

It has encouraged individuals to reframe their grievances as questions of fundamental rights and the deprivation of those rights, enabling them to seek legal remedies and fight against systemic inequalities in the workplace. Title VII's impact has been instrumental in fostering social change and promoting a more inclusive society.

Learn more about Civil Rights Act: https://brainly.com/question/30917757

#SPJ11

Answer:

President

Explanation:

Based on the information provided in this scenario, the best guess would be that John is the President of the country in question. This is because ANY individual that acts on behalf of the government and has been granted special or extraordinary power by the government has the ability to declare a national emergency. Yet the President of the country is usually known as the commander of the armed forces and holds the highest rank when making decisions on attacking another country. Therefore John designation would be as President of the country.

1920s-1960s was the time period when Canada and the US had the most restrictive immigration laws.

Prior to 1920, almost all immigration from Europe to the United States was unrestricted. Congress enacted a series of immigration quotas in the 1920s.

Because the quotas were applied on a country-by-country basis, immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was restricted more than immigration from Northern and Western Europe.

Finally, annual immigration to the United States fell from around 1 million to 150,000 people.

These laws were enacted against the backdrop of increasing federal regulation of immigration, which was previously controlled primarily by states until a series of Supreme Court rulings in the late 1800s declared it to be a federal responsibility.

To know more about immigration laws, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3655536

#SPJ4

Once a trial starts, the parties can still choose to settle the lawsuit instead of relying on the jury's decision. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the trial process. So, the statement is false.

False. Once a trial starts, the parties still have the option to settle the lawsuit even if the trial is ongoing. Settling a lawsuit means that the parties reach an agreement and resolve their dispute outside of court. Settlement negotiations can take place at any stage of the litigation process, including during an ongoing trial.

In fact, many lawsuits are settled before reaching a final verdict from the jury. Settling a case allows the parties to have control over the outcome and potentially avoid the risks and costs associated with a lengthy trial. Settlement agreements are typically reached through negotiations between the parties and may involve compromises and concessions.

It is important to note that once a trial reaches a verdict, the decision of the jury is binding and the parties must abide by it, unless there are grounds for appeal or other legal remedies. However, prior to the jury reaching a verdict, the parties retain the ability to settle the lawsuit and avoid the uncertainties of a trial outcome.

Learn more about lawsuit

https://brainly.com/question/30705473

#SPJ11

Answer:

A. All states splitting their electoral college votes between candidates based on what percentage of the Popular vote won.

Explanation:

Since Torres has the popular vote he would have the advantage to gain more electoral votes, but even with than, it doesn't guarantee a win in face:

Democratic Popular vote comes mainly from the State of California, and the NorthEast Section of the United States, the rest of the state follow alone, to give them more votes, although this is happening Marcus could still pickup several states, and electoral votes, even if Torres has more votes, not to mention safe states.

22. The type of business that often pays similar taxes like a sole proprietorship or a partnership, depending on whether there are one or more members is B. limited liability company.

23. With a life estate, property may revert to another party after the owner's death and not to the A. easement user.

24. Before judicial ruling for an agency takes place, administrative roles should be ripe and pertain to the involved C. beneficiaries.

25. The truth about criminal law is D. It involves wrongs against society.

Learn more about types of business at https://brainly.com/question/11984342

Answer:

The most common types of background checks search for criminal activity, verify employment and education, including identity verification, and request driving records. Some employers also review credit, and social media, and conducted drug tests.

Explanation: