After the 7 Years War, Prussia
became the greatest European
Force.
Due to this,
reduced to
almost nothing

Answer:

1 everyone is bound by the constitution

2 people elect representatives

3 each branch of the government has influence over the other

4 power is shared by national and sate government

5 Powers and responsibilities are divided among the legislative branch, executive branch, and judicial branch

6 rule by the people

7 personal freedoms are guaranteed by the bill of rights

Explanation: i did this on one of my tests and got a hundred

Many freed African Americans live near the plantations because the freedmen had no other homes or job prospects. The Option D.

After emancipation, many freed African Americans chose to live near the plantations where they were previously enslaved and continue working for their former slave owners. This decision was primarily driven by the lack of alternative homes or job prospects available to them.

Freedmen often faced immense challenges in finding secure housing and employment opportunities in a society deeply entrenched in racial discrimination and economic disparities.

Read more about enslaved worker

brainly.com/question/28943048

#SPJ1

Answer:

4. U.S. industries began making their own products

Answer:

Do you need help on learning what Arena Rock is Or...

Explanation:

The Anti-Imperialist League was a group of diverse and prominent Americans who banded together in 1898 to protest the idea of American empire building.

The League was formed in Boston on June 15, 1898, to fight against the annexation of the Philippines. The organization included some of the most famous and influential figures of the day, such as Andrew Carnegie, Mark Twain, Jane Addams, and William James.

The group of diverse and prominent Americans who banded together in 1898 to protest the idea of American empire building were referred to as the Anti-Imperialist League.

The group was formed on June 15, 1898, in Boston to fight against the annexation of the Philippines. The organization was made up of influential figures such as Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie, William James, and Jane Addams.

These influential figures felt that imperialism would bring more harm than good to America as it would lead to the loss of American ideals and values.

The league argued that the United States should not engage in imperialistic policies but should instead pursue peaceful coexistence and international cooperation.

They opposed the annexation of the Philippines, citing that it was against American values of self-governance and independence.

To know more about Anti-Imperialist League refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29782264#

#SPJ11

The Enlightenment-era belief in a god who created, but has no ongoing involvement in the world and events within it, was called deism.

The Age of Enlightenment describes belief in a creator god, but at some point withdraws from participation in creating him, which is a central tenet of deism.

Deism is a rationalist theology and philosophical position that rejects revelation as the source of divine knowledge and holds that empirical reason and observation of the natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and necessary to determine the existence of a supreme deity as creator of the world. world. Universe.

The Enlightenment-era may also require how belief in the existence of God is experienced in rational thought alone, without relying on arguments from revealed religions or religious authorities.

Deism emphasizes the concept of natural theology, that is, the existence of God is revealed through nature.

Generally, a deist is a person who affirms the existence of at least one divinity, but does not practice a religion and denies divine intervention in the world.

In this case, those who follow deism believe in a creator deity but who is not involved in any field.

Learn more about the enlightenment era at https://brainly.com/question/30335882

#SPJ4

Organizing history by region groups events and people according to a specific location. Regional history examines how events and individuals in a particular area influenced one another, as well as how that area was impacted by outside forces. On the other hand, organizing history by period categorizes events by time period.

Organizing history by region and organizing history by period are two different ways of approaching the study of history. While the former focuses on geographic location, the latter categorizes events by time period. Regional history is a method of studying history based on geographical boundaries. It groups events and people according to a specific location, such as a city, state, or country.

This approach examines how events and individuals in a particular area influenced one another, as well as how that area was impacted by outside forces. Regional history provides an in-depth understanding of how a specific location developed over time, as well as how it interacted with other regions. Periodization, on the other hand, is the practice of dividing history into distinct time periods or eras.

Each era is defined by specific events, developments, and characteristics. This approach provides a chronological overview of the past, which can help us understand how events and individuals were interconnected across time. By organizing history into periods, we can trace the evolution of ideas, technology, and culture over time, as well as examine how they were impacted by various factors.

For more such questions on Regional history, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/14800086

#SPJ8

The British, who used scorched-earth tactics, were the side that prevailed in the Boer Wars. Therefore, the British triumphed by adopting scorched earth strategy, which is option B, is right. Here is information about the Boer War.

What happened during the Boer War?

The British Army engaged in a brutal colonial war against the Boers in South Africa between 1899 and 1902. The Boers were a skillful and determined adversary despite having fewer men than other opponents. The British finally won after suffering early losses and a protracted period of guerilla warfare, but not before using contentious tactics. The British prevailed by deploying "scorched earth" strategies, hence option B is the appropriate response.

learn more about Boer war:

brainly.com/question/779422

#SPJ4

Answer:

Louis XVI decided to hold the Estates – General, which had not been assembled since 1614 because he needed to address France’s economic crisis. The Estates-General was supposed to represent the three estates. The First Estate was the clergy, the nobility was the Second Estate, and the Third Estate held the common people.

Explanation:

Fearing being overvoted by the most privileged estates, the representatives of the Third Estate gathered in a nearby indoor tennis court to take an oath to fight for a written constitution. King Louis XVI was pressured to force the clergy and the nobility to join with the Third Estate in the National Assembly.

A Parliamentary republic and a Parliamentary monarchy are two different forms of are two alternative forms of democracy wherein:

1. Parliamentary republic:

2. Parliamentary Monarchy:

To learn more about the

Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had different perspectives on the interpretation and application of the word "necessary" in relation to government powers and the Constitution.

Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, meaning that the federal government should only exercise powers explicitly granted to it in the document. For Jefferson, "necessary" meant that any action taken by the government must be explicitly authorized by the Constitution.

On the other hand, Alexander Hamilton had a broader interpretation of the word "necessary" and a more expansive view of federal powers. Hamilton believed that the federal government should have implied powers that are reasonably necessary and proper to carry out its enumerated powers.

Hamilton's perspective on the meaning of "necessary" can be seen in his advocacy for a strong central government, economic policies such as the establishment of a national bank, and the power to impose tariffs. He argued that these measures were necessary for the stability, security, and economic development of the young nation.

In this context, Hamilton refined the meaning of the word "necessary" by arguing that it encompassed not only what was explicitly stated in the Constitution but also what was reasonably required to fulfill the broader objectives and responsibilities of the federal government.

To know more about  hamilton visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32011879

#SPJ11

In the 1750 to 1900 time period, many European states strengthened and expanded their control over their colonies through various means. The extent to which this control was strengthened and expanded varied by region and by time period.

One way that states strengthened their control over colonies was through the implementation of new legal systems and bureaucracies. This was particularly evident in India, where the British East India Company established a system of law and bureaucracy that effectively governed the country.

Similarly, the French established a system of indirect rule in their West African colonies, which allowed them to exert significant control over the region through local intermediaries.

Another way that states expanded their control over colonies was through the use of military force. This was particularly evident in Africa, where European powers engaged in a "scramble for Africa" in the late 19th century. European states such as France, Britain, and Germany used military force to conquer and colonize much of the continent.

Overall, while states did strengthen and expand their control over colonies in the 1750 to 1900 time period, the extent of this control varied by region and by time period. Some states, such as the British in India, were able to establish effective systems of governance and bureaucracy, while others relied on military force to conquer and control their colonies.

To learn more about colonies refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20147075

#SPJ11

After World War II, Great Britain and France were the countries empowered to draw new borders in the Middle East.

Britain and France implemented the Sykes-Picot Agreement in 1919, dividing the Arab world into nation-states. The League of Nations recognized these borders and gave French and British "mandates" to govern these states until independence was ready.

During World War I, Mark Sykes, an Englishman, and François Picot, a Frenchman, demarcated the borders of the Middle East. Two diplomats pencil divide this map of one of the world's most dangerous regions into countries that transcend ethnic and religious boundaries.

After World War II, Britain and France were the countries empowered to design new borders in the Middle East. 

Know more about middle east here:

https://brainly.com/question/30204460

#SPJ4

Manchuria is taken over and invaded. 1932. In 1931, Japan invaded China in the region of Manchuria, renaming it Manchukuo and establishing a puppet regime led by Emperor Puyi (The Last Emperor).

A major international crisis was sparked by the Japanese invasion of Manchuria.

In 1931, Japan invaded the Chinese province of Manchuria in search of raw materials to fuel its expanding industries. By 1937, Japan had complete control over a lot of China, and war crimes committed against the Chinese were common.

Japan primarily imported coal, bean cake, and soya beans from Manchuria; With approximately 250,000 tons of pig iron supplied annually, it came in second place as a source; Additionally, it supplied small quantities of industrial salt, shale oil, wool, hides, and skins.

Learn more about History of Japan :

brainly.com/question/30647322

#SPJ1

The Magna Carta inspired later documents as It declared that the monarchy was subject to some limits. Option A. This is further explained below.

Generally, a system of governance in which one person has absolute power.

In conclusion, Because it established that the monarchy was subject to certain constraints, the Magna Carta served as an inspiration for other documents.

Read more about monarchy

https://brainly.com/question/3458331

#SPJ1

Answer:

i have no idea

Explanation:

(a) One reason given by South Carolina for secession was the belief that the federal government was not fulfilling its obligation to enforce the Fugitive Slave Clause of the United States Constitution.

(b) South Carolina could present the evidence of states in the North actively resisting the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners. They could argue that this failure of the federal government to uphold the constitutional provision undermined the rights of slaveholders and threatened the institution of slavery.

(c) One piece of evidence that could be used to refute South Carolina's argument is the existence of laws and court decisions that upheld the Fugitive Slave Act in various parts of the country. It could be pointed out that while there may have been instances of resistance, the federal government did take steps to enforce the law in other regions. This evidence would suggest that the issue was not a complete failure of enforcement but rather a matter of varying levels of compliance and enforcement across different states and jurisdictions.

To learn more about government click here:

brainly.com/question/31669402

#SPJ11

The Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 was a protest by soldiers of the Continental Army against the Congress of the Confederation, which was then meeting in Independence Hall in Philadelphia.

The Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 was an event that occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during the American Revolutionary War. On June 20, 1783, a group of soldiers from the Continental Army, who had not been paid for their service, marched on Philadelphia to demand payment. Congress, which was then meeting in the city, was unable to meet their demands, and the situation quickly escalated into a mutiny.

The soldiers' demands were not met, but the mutiny was eventually quelled without violence by the personal intervention of General George Washington. The event highlighted the weakness of the national government under the Articles of Confederation and contributed to the decision to relocate the nation's capital away from Philadelphia to a location further south, where it was hoped that it would be more secure from such threats.

To learn more about Pennsylvania Mutiny, click

https://brainly.com/question/13869839

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

I'm not 100% sure but i think it's d because you would need all of those things for it to snow.

The primary solution to the dilemma is the freedom to vote. As a result of World War I, women enjoyed a plethora of new experiences.

In both cartoons, Uncle Sam represents the United States, but with distinct goals. He is clothed nearly identically in each, but his weight, how he interacts with other characters, and the objects he carries distinguish him and hence the each artist's goals. Uncle Sam (also known as the United States) is a popular national personification of the United States' federal government or the country in general. Uncle Sam has been a prominent icon of the United States government in American culture since the early nineteenth century.

To know about the uncle sam visit:

https://brainly.com/question/818460

#SPJ1

The primary solution to the dilemma is the freedom to vote. As a result of World War I, women enjoyed a plethora of new experiences.

In both cartoons, Uncle Sam represents the United States, but with distinct goals. He is clothed nearly identically in each, but his weight, how he interacts with other characters, and the objects he carries distinguish him and hence the each artist's goals. Uncle Sam (also known as the United States) is a popular national personification of the United States' federal government or the country in general. Uncle Sam has been a prominent icon of the United States government in American culture since the early nineteenth century.

Learn more about objects here:https://brainly.com/question/14964361

#SPJ11

The given statement "The immigration and nationality act of 1952 terminated native american reservations and forced them to integrate into american culture." is false because the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 did not terminate Native American reservations and force them to integrate into American culture.

This act mainly focused on regulating immigration to the United States and naturalization of foreign nationals. It did not have provisions related to Native American reservations or their culture.The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 allowed Native Americans to establish their own governments and preserve their cultural heritage.

This act also provided funding for the development of Native American reservations and their economic growth. Therefore, the statement that the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 terminated Native American reservations and forced them to integrate into American culture is incorrect.

To know more about  Immigration refer here

brainly.com/question/29998020

#SPJ11

coal mining nobody wanted to buy it and oil became more popular

Answer:

Option C

Explanation:

Docket is a schedule of cases to be heard during a given session

Answer: the 19th-century doctrine or belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable.

Explanation:

Answer: to create a destiny

Explanation:

One of the possible explanation for the origins of the first civilizations is that the availability of surplus resources allowed some individuals to become skilled at non-subsistence activities.

A civilization is a complex society that is characterized by urban development, social stratification, a centralized government, complex forms of economic and political organization, cultural innovations, writing systems, and some kind of symbolic communication system, such as art and architecture. It is considered to be a more advanced form of social organization than a tribe or a band.

The exact factors that led to the rise of civilizations are not entirely understood, but scholars have put forth a number of theories. One of the theories is that the availability of surplus resources allowed some individuals to become skilled at non-subsistence activities. This led to the development of specialized labor and the emergence of social classes and hierarchies.

To learn more about  Civilizations visit here:

brainly.com/question/12207844

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Nativists were a bundle of supporters towards native citizens, they were against the immigrant movements and were often described as supporting the founders cause.

In the 19th century they were founded, and from then they took off.

Hope this helped.

Answer:

the policy of protecting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants. the policy or practice of preserving or reviving an indigenous culture.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attach, we can say the following.

The oligarchy of Greece decided to make changes around 630 B.C because the oligarchy realized they had not enough people to fight the poor in Greece.

It was a time in ancient Greece where a small group of powerful people controlled the government of the region. That is what oligarchy means. It was a time before the dawn of Democracy, a concept created by Cleisthenes in Athens.

The Greek oligarchy ruled before democracy, and they were aristocrats, an elite and wealthy class that imposed its will over the poor people.

According to the 1975 case of O'Connor v. Donaldson, a nondangerous mentally ill individual cannot be involuntarily committed to a mental institution without due process. The case was a landmark decision that established the constitutional rights of mentally ill individuals and limited the power of states to institutionalize them against their will.

The case involved Kenneth Donaldson, a man who had been involuntarily committed to a Florida mental hospital for 15 years. Donaldson was not considered dangerous and had never been convicted of a crime, but was deemed mentally ill by state officials and confined to the hospital. He filed a lawsuit against the hospital superintendent, Dr. James O'Connor, arguing that his confinement was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled in Donaldson's favor, stating that "a State cannot constitutionally confine without more a nondangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by himself or with the help of willing and responsible family members or friends."
The decision was a significant victory for mental health advocates, who had long argued that institutionalization was often unnecessary and harmful. It also established the principle that individuals with mental illness have the same rights as other citizens and cannot be deprived of their liberty without due process of law. Today, the legacy of O'Connor v. Donaldson continues to shape mental health policy and practice. It is widely recognized as a landmark case that helped to establish the rights of mentally ill individuals and paved the way for more humane and effective approaches to mental health care.

To learn more about constitutional rights refer:

https://brainly.com/question/8916759

#SPJ11