Against this background consider the following set of facts:
In 2004 the Khumalos sold their farm to Peter and Jenny, a couple who are married in community
of property. There are two homesteads on the farm. A right of habitatio was reserved over the
smaller homestead on the farm in favour of the Khumalos for as long as they lived. This right
was duly registered against the title deed of the farm of Peter and Jenny. Peter and Jenny moved
into the bigger homestead but made life unbearable for the Khumalos. As a result of Peter and
Jenny’s ill-mannered behaviour the Khumalos decided to leave the smaller homestead in which
they lived. After a few years the Khumalos wish to return to the smaller homestead on the farm.
During an appointment with their attorney, the Khumalos described themselves as pensioners
who are struggling to make ends meet on their small state pension. The attorney promised to
consider their legal position and to provide them with and opinion, but the Khumalos decided to
return to the smaller homestead while Peter and Jenny were on holiday. Upon their return, Peter
and Jenny find the Khumalos in the smaller homestead. They were not impressed and decided
to make their lives unbearable again. Peter and Jenny decided that the smaller homestead
needs to be redeveloped for a period of two years. Their argument was that the homestead was
severely dilapidated and was extremely hazardous and uninhabitable to occupy. Many planning
and negotiations took place between Peter and Jenny and the Khumalos. At first, the Khumalo’s
refused because according to them there was nothing wrong with the state of the smaller
homestead.
The Khumalos eventually consented to the removal of the roof tiles and also to move out of the
smaller homestead, however they did not agree on the date on which they would be vacating
the homestead. Peter and Jenny assisted by private contractors removed the roof tiles while the
Khumalos were still inside. During this process most of the roof tiles cracked to such an extent
that that they could not be used again. The Khumalos realised that they have to move out of the
homestead immediately, although they were not satisfied to do so. After moving out, they
approach their attorney who advised them to institute the spoliation remedy immediately. The
Khumalos however inform the attorney that Peter and Jenny told them that they will not be
successful with the spoliation remedy since they agreed to move out of the homestead and
furthermore that it is impossible to restore control because the roof tiles were broken.
Against this background answer the following questions:

question 1
Is the spoliation remedy the correct or incorrect remedy for the Khumalos to institute against
Peter and Jenny to have their control of the smaller homestead restored? Motivate your answer.

question 2

Will the Khumalos succeed with the spoliation remedy? Keep in mind that they consented to the
removal of the roof tiles and to moving out of the homestead and that the roof tiles were
damaged. Fully substantiate your answer. In your answer refer to the requirements to succeed
with the spoliation remedy as well as the nature and purpose of the spoliation remedy. (7)
​

The legal description provided represents acres of land located in Section 7.

The legal description provided can be broken down into several parts, each indicating a specific area within a section of land.

Starting from the outermost description, we see that this land is located in Section 7. A section of land is one square mile or 640 acres. Therefore, Section 7 initially consists of 640 acres.

Moving inward, the next description is the "ne 1/4" which stands for the northeast quarter of the section. A quarter of a section is equal to 160 acres. Therefore, the northeast quarter of Section 7 initially consists of 160 acres.

The next description is the "nw 1/4" which stands for the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Since a quarter of 160 acres is 40 acres, the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter is equal to 40 acres.

Next, we have the "se 1/4" which stands for the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Therefore, the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter is equal to 10 acres.

Finally, we have the "south 1/2" which stands for half of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 7. Therefore, the south 1/2 of the se 1/4 of the nw 1/4 of the ne 1/4 of Section 7 is equal to 5 acres.

In summary, the legal description provided represents 5 acres of land located in Section 7.

For more question on "Land Located in Section 7" :

https://brainly.com/question/14414648

#SPJ11

Bullying is not one of the most common ethical breaches one will see as a leader. The Option D is correct.

An ethical breach occurs when someone within a system or community makes an ethical decision that sets a precedent for others to follow. The danger of ethical breaches is that they represent a fundamental shift in your organization's ethics.

Some examples of ethical breach include discrimination, safety violations, poor working conditions, and leaking confidential information. Bribery, forgery, and theft, while certainly unethical, cross over into criminal activity and are frequently dealt with outside the company.

Missing options "misusing company time counterfeiting theft bullying"

Read more about ethical breach

brainly.com/question/14864299

#SPJ1

It is because Americans often share a common understanding of political ideas. That holds every person has certain inalienable rights and that the government's responsibility is to serve and safeguard its constituents.

The reasons that politicians run for government are based on their pecuniary interests and their desire to promote their careers. According to Elazar's Theory, Texas has both conventional and entrepreneurial political cultures.

The idea that Texans perceive political involvement as an economical perk rather than the value of giving to society is the reason why voter participation in Texas is higher than that in the majority of other American states.

Democratic socialism is a prime illustration of a political subculture. Democratic socialism is a political movement whose adherents think that certain industries, including healthcare, should be socialized to further the common welfare. They also think that the market should be subjected to democratic decision-making.

Learn more about Elazar's Theory here;

https://brainly.com/question/4349581

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.

Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.

The given statement both chambers make use of a system of majority and minority whips is true because The job of the whip is to count votes and ensure that party members are in attendance and voting in line with party objectives.

A whip is a political position in the United States government that is primarily concerned with managing and controlling the behavior of legislators in the party or caucus to which they belong.

They assist in the coordination of party policy and legislative goals, ensuring that the majority party passes laws that align with the party's objectives. The Senate Majority Whip and Minority Whip, as well as the House Majority Whip and Minority Whip, are essential positions in both chambers.

They are in charge of maintaining party unity and discipline by ensuring that all party members support their caucus or party on crucial votes. The whip's position is significant since they can convey crucial details to their party leadership and persuade individual members to vote in a particular way.

Learn more about minority and majority whip https://brainly.com/question/13467401

#SPJ11

The role of the police encompasses much more than dealing with crime because they also respond to social service duties as police officers are highly visible to the public and public has lost faith in other agencies.

They are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. They're the first people most individuals think of when they need assistance, especially in emergencies. They have the equipment and experience required to deal with a wide range of problems.

The public is disillusioned with other agencies' ability to deal with various issues. Police departments are increasingly being forced to take on responsibilities that were previously performed by other organizations, such as hospitals and social service organizations, who are unable to cope with the increasing demands on their services.

Law enforcement agencies now play a vital role in managing the consequences of social issues that are the product of societal structures. The police department is tasked with resolving these concerns because they are the only agency available and equipped to do so. This is largely due to the community's expectations of them as public servants.

For more such questions on crime  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ8

Answer:

Making treaties with other countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

Explanation:

In the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution. The correct option is (D).

The Constitution outlines the three main federal government branches and their respective responsibilities. It also specifies the fundamental legislation of the United States federal government.

It is the oldest written national constitution still in use and has come to represent Western legal precedent.

The states ratified a charter of governance, and it is still regarded as the ultimate law of the land. Both writings have had a significant impact on American history and the global development of democracy.

Therefore, in the following, Making treaties with foreign countries would not be within the powers of Congress according to the Constitution.

To know more about the Constitution, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19411179

#SPJ5

1.  By analyzing these cartoons, we can gain a deeper understanding of the challenges, controversies, and public perception of the early New Deal initiatives.

2. While both speeches reflect a commitment to progressive ideals, they also exhibit notable differences in their understanding and approach to achieving progress.

Question One:

The author of this piece expresses bias toward immigrants in several ways. Firstly, the author characterizes immigrants as "handicapped" and highlights their ignorance of English, implying that they are incapable and inferior. Secondly, the author suggests that immigrants are desperate for work and will accept any job, regardless of its undesirable nature, reinforcing the stereotype of immigrants as desperate and willing to take advantage of. Lastly, the author emphasizes the burden that immigrants place on charitable organizations during times of unemployment, portraying them as a drain on society.

For example, the author states, "The immigrant man finds himself much handicapped when he tries to obtain work..." This quote reflects the bias by portraying immigrants as inherently disadvantaged in their ability to find employment due to their language barrier.

These biases contribute to a negative portrayal of immigrants as incapable and burdensome, perpetuating stereotypes and potentially shaping public opinion against them.

Question Two:

This document provides insights into the world of work in the early twentieth century, particularly for unskilled immigrants. It reveals that a significant portion of available work for immigrants was seasonal and located at a considerable distance from urban centers like Chicago. The work mentioned includes jobs in foundries, stock yards, mines, construction, harvest fields, and camps. These jobs were often short-term, poorly paid, and required the immigrants to constantly move from place to place in search of employment.

For example, the document states, "Much of this work is seasonal and is located at a great distance from the city... A large number of men are needed for a few months or weeks..." This quote highlights the temporary nature of the work and the need for immigrants to constantly relocate.

These insights have implications for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States during that time. Immigrants, particularly those lacking skills or language proficiency, were often relegated to low-paying and precarious jobs, subject to exploitation by contractors and employment agencies. The need for immediate work and limited options forced them into these undesirable positions, perpetuating a cycle of unskilled labor and making it difficult for them to improve their socioeconomic status.

Overall, this document reveals the challenges faced by unskilled immigrants in finding stable employment and sheds light on the exploitative nature of the labor market during the early twentieth century in the United States.

Know more about stereotype here:

https://brainly.com/question/30916993

#SPJ8

The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

Question One: In what ways does the author of this piece, written in 1908, express bias toward immigrants?

Question Two: what specific things can be learned about the world of work in the early twentieth century from this document? What are the implications of these lessons for understanding the immigrant experience in the United States?

Each answer must be no more than 200 words in length and the total length of what hoy submit must not exceed 400 words.

* A good format is to answer in about 2-3 sentences where the first sentence answers the question, making a claim/argument. The second sentence brings in a specific example from the source material ( i.e.a short quote or paraphrase). Then the third sentence explains/analyzes how that example validates your claim and expounds its significance historically.

Any quotations should be brief, and should only come from the document used in the assignment. You need to cite your source with a parenthetical citation by putting the author and page number at the end of the sentence in parentheses(Abbot,481).

Do not quote the textbook or summarize lecture! That is not the point of the assignment.

Completion of this assignment requires no additional sources. You must not use Wikipedia or any other internet source.

The HIPAA Security Rule contains what provision about encryption, It is required based on organizational policy. correct answer is c.

The HIPAA Security Rule requires that covered entities and business associates implement appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information (ePHI). One such technical safeguard is encryption, which is the process of converting information into a secure code that can only be deciphered with a specific key or password. The Security Rule does not explicitly require encryption for all ePHI, but it does state that covered entities and business associates must assess the risks to ePHI and implement measures to reduce those risks to a reasonable and appropriate level. This means that if a covered entity determines that encryption is necessary to adequately safeguard ePHI, then it must be implemented. Ultimately, the decision to use encryption should be based on organizational policy and risk management considerations. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. It is important to note that while small providers may not be explicitly exempt from the Security Rule, they may be able to use alternate and less costly measures to safeguard ePHI.

To know more about HIPAA visit:

brainly.com/question/28224288

#SPJ11

Answer:

The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.

Explanation:

To prove a defendant guilty in a criminal case, the state must provide d. sufficient evidence that jurors will believe the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This evidentiary requirement signifies the highest standard of proof within the legal framework. It demands that the evidence presented by the state be robust, compelling, and capable of eradicating any plausible doubt in the minds of the jurors concerning the defendant's culpability.

The standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt sets an exacting threshold , embodying the utmost stringency of the legal system .

Find out more on defendants at https://brainly.com/question/13038877

#SPJ4

The correct answer is d. sufficient evidence that jurors will believe the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

In a criminal case, the burden of proof rests on the prosecution, which is usually represented by the State. To secure a guilty verdict, the state must present sufficient evidence that convinces the jurors or the judge (in a bench trial) that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This standard of proof requires the evidence to be strong and compelling, leaving no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors about the defendant's guilt. Options a, b, and c are not accurate. A preponderance of the evidence is the lower burden of proof used in civil cases, not criminal cases. The requirement of three-fourths agreement or having more evidence than the defense is not applicable in determining guilt in a criminal case.

To know more about the burden of proof in criminal cases, click here: brainly.com/question/14696415

#SPJ11

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

1a: The Fundamental values and laws of a country, state, or social group that define the roles and responsibilities of the government and provide certain protections for its citizens.  b: a document that encapsulates a political or social organization's regulations.

No one shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law," according to the Fifth Amendment, and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, enacted in 1868, utilizes the same eleven words to describe a duty on all states.

The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.

Decide on the main problem or query.

Think about business aspects that might have an impact on the main issue.

Describe the outside factors that will affect the problem.

Make a list of the important uncertainties.

Limit the potential futures.

Describe each selected situation in its entirety.

An impartial court.

Notification of the proposed action and the claimed justifications.

Opportunity to discuss arguments against the suggested action.

A person's ability to present evidence, particularly their ability to summon witnesses.

The right to be aware of contrary evidence.

The ability to question opposing witnesses directly.

Overview. A citizen must be given notice, an opportunity to be heard, and a decision by an impartial decision-maker when the federal government takes a course of action that robs them of their life, liberty, or property interest.  This is known as procedural due process.

To Know more about Fundamental

https://brainly.com/question/2224584

#SPJ13

The US Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon.com Inc. on Wednesday, alleging that the company deceived customers into signing up for its Prime membership service and purposely made it difficult to unsubscribe.

Amazon.com Inc. was sued by the US Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday on the grounds that it tricked customers into subscribing to its Prime membership service and purposefully made it difficult to cancel.

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, the FTC's most aggressive move against the firm to date under the leadership of Lina Khan, accusing it of illegally pressuring customers to subscribe to its Prime membership and then making it difficult for them to abandon it.

The ftc and amazon here: https://brainly.com/question/14266241

#SPj1

Other things equal, the fundamental characteristic of the law of demand is that the quantity demanded of a good decreases as the price of the good increases.

This is because, as the price of a good increases, consumers have less money to spend on other goods, so they will demand less of the good.

For example, if the price of a gallon of milk increases from $2 to $3, consumers will likely buy less milk, and instead spend their money on other goods, such as bread or eggs.

The law of demand is a fundamental economic principle that is used to explain the relationship between price and quantity demanded. It is one of the most important laws in economics, and it is used to make predictions about how markets will behave.

There are a number of factors that can affect the demand for a good, in addition to price. These factors include income, tastes, expectations, and the number of buyers in the market.

However, the law of demand states that, other things equal, a decrease in price will lead to an increase in quantity demanded, and an increase in price will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded.

To know more about law of demand, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32463907#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Section 179 of the Constitution of South Africa states that "a National Director of Public Prosecutions, who is the head of the prosecuting authority; and is appointed by the President" Trace the different individuals who served as National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) since 1994 and their relationships with the various Presidents at the time. In this light, discuss the “power” of the office of the NDPP in relation to nepotism, corruption and state capture. (4)

The Office of the National Director of Public Prosecutions has the power to give support to National Director by making policy against corruption and state capture.

The Office of the National Director of Public enhance smooth delivery of job roles of National Director and his job functions which is consistent with the Constitution.

Prosecuting Authority Act, of 1998, the body can prosecute offenders.

Learn more about constitution at;

https://brainly.com/question/470736

Living systems do not violate the second law of thermodynamics, but they do decrease their entropy while increasing the entropy of the universe. The correct option is 3.

Living systems do not violate the second law of thermodynamics because they consume energy and release waste heat, which increases the overall entropy of the universe. However, living systems do decrease their own entropy by maintaining highly ordered structures and processes, such as maintaining a constant internal temperature or replicating DNA. This decrease in entropy is possible because living systems require a constant input of energy from their environment to maintain their highly ordered state.

A non-spontaneous reaction is typically endergonic, meaning it requires energy input to occur. It is not at equilibrium and is not exergonic, which refers to a reaction that releases energy. The correct option is 3.

Learn more about thermodynamics at:

brainly.com/question/3808473

#SPJ4

Answer:When your in A court Basketball Do some Exercise Like stretching your muscle..

Answer:

Governments can offer financial assistance to private businesses making investments through the use of economic incentives. Incentives can include tax abatements, tax revenue sharing, grants, infrastructure assistance, no or low-interest financing, free land, tax credits and other financial resources. But the question is, why? Why do government agencies invest public resources to support business development? The answer lies within the classic “but for” requirement of economic incentives. Understanding the “but for” and how to properly prepare the information required by government entities is critical to your project’s success.

Explanation:

Here is my best answer to help you out.

It is true that the data does suggest that marijuana use increases the likelihood of a person committing a violent crime.

Several studies have found a strong association between marijuana use and violent behavior, including aggression and assault. However, it is important to note that correlation does not necessarily imply causation and more research is needed to fully understand the relationship between marijuana use and violent behavior.

The data on the relationship between marijuana use and violent crime is not definitive. Some studies suggest a weak association, while others do not find any significant correlation between the two. It is important to consider various factors, such as the context and individual differences, when assessing this issue.

Visit here to learn more about marijuana  :  https://brainly.com/question/28931357
#SPJ11

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.

When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'

So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.

Answer:

The objective lower the damage or the risks on the Company

Explanation:

Definition in my own words:

So the value of a risk management plan is a object or a plan you can say to lower/under the harm/damage on the company or the organization.

Short form:

The objective lower the damage or the risks on the Company.

Key words:

1: Organization

2: value

3: Management

Hope this helps.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Substantive law is a type of law that defines, regulates, and creates legal relationships, as well as prohibits certain conduct.

It sets the rules by which one may enforce their rights under the law. This is different from procedural law, which focuses on the processes and procedures involved in the legal system.

Substantive law helps to establish and maintain a just and orderly society by clearly outlining the rights and responsibilities of individuals and organizations.

In summary, substantive law is essential for defining and regulating legal relationships and conduct, while procedural law ensures that the legal system operates effectively and fairly.

To know more about Substantive law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/30673552#

#SPJ11