All options, except option A, could result in statutory disqualification of a registered representative in the securities industry.
Option A, which states that any individual or firm may be subject to a statutory disqualification, is incorrect. Statutory disqualification in the securities industry is not applicable to all individuals or firms universally. Rather, it pertains to specific individuals or firms who meet certain criteria that trigger disqualification.
Options B, C, and D accurately describe aspects related to statutory disqualification. Option B highlights that certain persons may be able to re-enter or continue in the securities industry following a statutory disqualification, subject to specific conditions.
Option C correctly identifies various disqualifying events, such as bars, injunctions, suspensions, and expulsions from certain activities, self-regulatory organizations (SROs), and exchanges. Option D correctly states that individuals can be subject to statutory disqualification for a specified duration following the completion of a criminal sentence, typically 10 years.
Learn more about statutory disqualification here:
https://brainly.com/question/14612576
#SPJ11
how did massachusetts governor calvin coolidge handle the boston police strike?
Governor Coolidge handled the Boston Police Strike by ordering the State Guard, at the request of the City, to take over the duties of the striking officers. He also issued an ultimatum to the strikers, demanding they return to work or face dismissal. The strike ended shortly afterwards.
In response to the Boston Police Strike in 1919, Governor Calvin Coolidge declared a state of emergency, mobilized the National Guard, and declared that the police officers involved would be dismissed. He also issued a proclamation that stated "there is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anytime, anywhere."
In addition, Coolidge worked to reform the police department and make it more professional. He established a new police commission, made the police force a civil service organization, and instituted a merit system to select police officers.
To learn more about Governor Coolidge link is here:
brainly.com/question/1832554
#SPJ4
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT
a. businesses sell goods and services in the product market
b. individuals supply resources in the resource market
c. the government buys goods and services in the product market
d. businesses sell resources in the product market
All the following are true regarding the circular flow model EXCEPT businesses sell goods and services in the product market. Thus the correct option is A.
What is the circular flow model?The circular flow model shows the supply of funds in society. Money is sent back to and from producers and employees in the form of wages and payments for goods.
Determining how money circulates within an industry is the central goal of the model of circular flow. It separates the economy into its two main sectors, namely, households and corporations.
The circular flow model offers one method for illuminating the relationships between various economic sectors. The interconnections between the various sectors' flows of money, products and services, production inputs, and income are represented.
Therefore, option A is appropriate.
Learn more about the circular flow model, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11324259
#SPJ2
A polygraph test is conducted, and the findings indicate that there is an 80 percent chance of deception. What does this mean for the investigation?
a) The suspect is guilty and should be arrested for the crime.
b) The suspect is probably just nervous since 80 percent is a pretty high number and usually indicates a false positive.
c) The suspect might be guilty, but more information is needed from other parts of the investigation.
D)There has been a mistake in the polygraph test, and the test should be conducted again to get better results.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Using your z-score table, find P(z < 1.89)
A child was abducted from a local restaurant. Police closed the restaurant while they
processed the scene for evidence. As they neared the end of processing the crime
scene, another child was abducted in a park, not far away. Some of the evidence
from the two scenes appears similar, but other evidence is different. Police want to
keep the restaurant closed and look for new evidence later if the investigation
suggests they should. Which statement is true?
The police need a search warrant to continue searching the restaurant, according
to Mincey v. Arizona.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Michigan v. Tyler.
The police do not need to get a search warrant, according to Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals.
Answer:
Explanation:
The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States.
The statement which is true as per the given scenario is - "The police need to get a search warrant, according to Frye v. United States". Thus, option first is correct.
What is search warrant?A search warrant is a court order issued by a magistrate or judge authorizing law enforcement authorities to search a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and seize any evidence found. A search warrant cannot be granted in most nations to facilitate civil proceedings.
A youngster was kidnapped from a nearby eatery. The eatery was shuttered as police investigated the area for evidence. Police intend to shut the establishment and search for fresh evidence later if the inquiry leads them to believe they should.
According to the scenario, "The police need to seek a search warrant, pursuant to Frye v. United States," according to the stated circumstances. As a result, option one is correct.
Learn more about the search warrant here:
https://brainly.com/question/2863065
#SPJ2
does cost-benefit anaylsis such as the ford pinto case invalidate the utilitarian argument
Cost-benefit analysis is a popular economic tool used to determine the economic feasibility of a project or policy by weighing the costs and benefits of an investment or decision.
One well-known example of cost-benefit analysis is the Ford Pinto case, where the company made a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was worth investing in a costly design change that would prevent the car from bursting into flames in a rear-end collision.
However, the Ford Pinto case raises questions about the ethics of cost-benefit analysis and its validity as a decision-making tool. Utilitarianism, as a moral philosophy, argues that actions should be based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
The Ford Pinto case highlights a potential flaw in cost-benefit analysis as it seems to prioritize monetary considerations over the well-being of individuals and society.
To read more about cost-benefit analysis, Visit- https://brainly.com/question/14556838
#SPJ11
Question 16
2 pts
erma enters into a contract to buy a tract of lakefront property from forest acres to build and sell a
residential development. forest acres fails to close the sale. erma's remedy is most likely
the amount that erma invested in the project to the date of the closing.
o nothing-forest acres still owns the land.
o the difference between the contract and market prices of the land.
specific performance.
question 17
2 pts
The "Contract Price" refers to the specific price that a given buyer and seller have decided upon to sell a particular house. The Appraised Value is a certified assessment of what the market as a whole could be willing to pay for a house.
Can the price on a contract be changed?Typically, neither you nor the vendor has the authority to unilaterally alter the conditions. However, some agreements are made with the option for price adjustments in case project size and scope change in the future.
What drives market pricing?The combination between supply and demand determines market pricing. The balance between supply and demand determines an equilibrium price.
To know more about Contract Price visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14450413
#SPJ4
Is there a defense of crime we talked about in this chapter that you think should not be a valid defense?
Answer: yes. Over 50% of defendants' statements about the case are 1. not supported; 2. cannot be proved; 3. are provably wrong.
On top of it, the federal judge appointed to the case, introduced obvious procedural fraud into it - used the incorrect date the case was officially filed and thus timebarred important claims, on top of other violations of plaintiff's rights.
Explanation:
Question 1 (1 point)
This format is a layered image file used in Adobe Photoshop.
TIFF (Tagged Image File Format)
JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group)
BMP (Bitmap)
O PSD (Photoshop Document)
Answer:
PSD
Explanation:
which of the following is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.
Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.
Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.
The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?
cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money
Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income
Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years
Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"
Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:
brainly.com/question/31749142
#SPJ4
After reading about Margaret Mead’s studies, what are sociologists MOST likely to say about the role of women in societies?
A.
Women are always placed in a sensitive, nurturing role.
B.
Women are always choosing an aggressive and selfish role.
C.
Women can take on roles that are sensitive or aggressive.
D.
Women cannot survive without following leadership of men
According to the Margaret Mead’s studies, Women cannot survive without following leadership of men are sociologists most likely to say about the role of women in societies.
Who is sociologist?The examination of societal life, social modification, and the societal causes and consequences of human conduct is adverted to as sociology.
Sociologists study the structure of organizations, groups, and communities, as well as how people interact in them.
Each of the civilizations Mead researched had a distinct pattern of male and female conduct, all of which differed from gender role expectations in the United States at the time.
She discovered a receptive, polite and cooperative attitude among the Arapesh, both males and females. He believed that the Women cannot live on without favorable leadership of men.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about the sociologist, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/606515
#SPJ2
Answer: C. Women can take on roles that are sensitive or aggressive.
Select the examples that best demonstrate likely tasks for Professional Support Services workers. Check all that apply. Leon gives psychological tests to students and assesses their results. Helen sets goals, and creates rules and policies for a school. Alexander helps high-school students decide which classes to take. Ebony helps children find books and magazines in a school library. Kyle teaches a kindergarten class that prepares students for first grade. Francisca is a parent who donates money to a school program.
Answer: 1, 3, 4
Explanation:
i took the test
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
Edge 2021
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take place at a local restaurant. the officer obtained a search warrant for the restaurant and arrived with other uniformed officers to search the premises. while conducting the search, the officer searched several of the customers. while searching one of the restaurant's regular customers, the officer felt an object in the customer's pocket and pulled out a container filled with heroin. the customer was arrested and later convicted of possession of heroin. a state statute permits officers executing a search warrant to search persons on the premises if the officers reasonably expect danger to themselves or a risk of disposal or concealment of anything described in the warrant. if the customer challenges his conviction on the ground that his fourth amendment rights were violated, will he be successful?
Answer:
a police officer learned from a reliable informant that a major drug deal was about to take pla
Explanation:
For most of American history, those most in need were cared for by which of the following?
a. international charity organizations
b. federal government programs
c. state government programs
d. local government programs
For most of American history, those most in need were cared for by Local government programs. The correct option is d.
Local government programs have been in charge of helping those in need for the majority of American history. This included initiatives like poorhouses, which gave the needy housing and basic necessities as well as other types of assistance and support for the underprivileged and weaker members of society.
In order to address issues of poverty and social welfare, state and federal government programs also emerged such as the Social Security Act of 1935 and the creation of Medicaid and other assistance programs.
The administration of many social welfare and poverty related programs and services, however still takes place at the local level, with county and municipal governments playing a significant role in helping those in need. The correct option is d.
Learn more about Local government at:
brainly.com/question/31333519
#SPJ1
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.
True / False
Duty-based ethical standards are based on religious precepts or derived through philosophical reasoning.True
Deontological (duty-based) ethics is concerned with what people do rather than the outcomes of their actions.
Make the correct decision.Perform the action because it is the right thing to do.Don't do anything wrong.They should be avoided because they are incorrect.This type of ethics does not allow you to justify an action by demonstrating that it had positive consequences, which is why it is also known as 'non-Consequentialist'.
The term 'deontological' is derived from the Greek word deon, which means 'duty'.
When people talk about 'the principle of the thing,' they usually mean duty-based ethics.
Learn more about ethical standards to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/28295890
#SPJ4
a contract for car insurance is governed by: group of answer choices the restatement of torts all of the answers are correct the uniform commercial code common law
Pros and cons of the death penalty
Answer:
cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
pros: no prison
Explanation:
In the “Little Albert” experiment, psychologist John Watson conditioned a(n) ____________.
A.
lab rat to fear an infant
B.
infant to fear Santa Claus
C.
infant to fear a lab rat
D.
lab rat to fear loud noises
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Infant to fear a lab rat
Explanation:
The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.
Please give Brainliest :)
The statement below is from a jury's decision in a court case.
"We, the jury, rule in favor of Mrs. Garcia, and order Mr. Wakefield to pay the sum of twenty thousand dollars, plus attorney fees and court costs.."
Based on the statement above, what type of case has the jury decided?
A. civil
B. criminal
C. military
D. statutory
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:
A). Civil
What are the types of cases?The courts deal with a number of cases which include:
Civil CasesFamily CasesCriminal casesAs per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.
The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Jury" here:
brainly.com/question/20407684
Which event dramatically changed how much power the king would hold?
The Legislative Branch of the United States is NOT entrusted with which of the powers listed below?
It should be: Command of the Armed Forces is the right answer
_____ increase your risk.
A. All forms of distraction
B. Only some forms of distraction
C. Only tech distractions
D. Only emotional distractions
10. A contract without consideration is vold. Which of the following is an exception to this
rule?
A. An agreement between family members
B. An agreement to perform an impossible act
C. An agreement on account of love and compassion
D. An agreement to pay a debt that has been barred by statute
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i think so i dont study law or so hopefully i helped somehow
Normally, a contract without consideration is void, except C. An agreement on account of love and compassion.
Ordinarily, there must be a consideration for a contract to be enforceable. Otherwise, the contract is void. The requirement of consideration demands each party to provide something of value in exchange.
In a loving and compassionate relationship, consideration is not required because the law considers a give and take, which is sacrifice, as consideration by law.
Thus, the contract without consideration is void, except in Option C.
Learn more about consideration in contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/1387188
In one paragraph, summarize the Sicteenth Amendment and describe the change it creates ia
The 16th Amendment is a change or addition to the rules of the United States. The Constitution was approved in 1913. It lets Congress charge a tax on money earned from anything. Most states in the South and West mostly agreed with the change.
What is the Sixteenth AmendmentBefore the 16th Amendment, the constitution said that taxes had to be based on the population of each state. The 16th Amendment, passed in 1913, gave Congress the authority to make and collect income taxes.
This text means that the government can collect taxes on people's incomes, no matter where the money comes from. The taxes do not have to be divided among the different states and don't need to be based on a population count. This change was important for the United States.
Read more about Sixteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/24190621
#SPJ1
Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific reference to the law of contract, discuss.
sorry....too complex for a non law student
THIS QUESTION IS REGARDING INTERNATIONAL METHODS OF PAYMENT
3- You’re an exporter of raw material. You must close an operation and you have not defined the means of payment to use. You have three options: transfer, documentary credit and credit card. The importer requires you the financing of the operation, you must consider this situation. However you need to pay your local supplier of raw material.
How can you pay your local supplier before the deadline for the funding given by the importer and prior to export of the goods? What means of payment can you use?
Assuming that you are in your first transaction with your importer. How would you do in this case to pay your local supplier?
In this case, to pay the local supplier before the funding deadline given by the importer and prior to exporting the goods, I would consider using a transfer or credit card as means of payment.
A transfer would involve directly transferring funds from my bank account to the local supplier's account, ensuring timely payment. Alternatively, I could use a credit card to make the payment to the local supplier, which would allow me to temporarily finance the transaction until I receive payment from the importer.
Both options provide a way to fulfill my obligation to the local supplier while awaiting the financing from the importer in my first transaction.
Learn more about payment mode here
https://brainly.com/question/32691151
#SPJ4
an individual who claims she will be harmed by a bill that is under deliberation in congress but is not yet law conjures which of the following standards?
The individual who claims she will be harmed by a bill that is under deliberation in congress but is not yet law conjures the standard of "standing."
In legal terms, standing refers to the requirement that a plaintiff must have a sufficient stake in a controversy to bring a lawsuit. In order to establish standing, the individual must show that she has suffered or will suffer an injury-in-fact that is directly related to the bill in question. The injury must be concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent. Additionally, the individual must show that the injury is redressable by a favorable decision from the court. Therefore, if the individual meets these standing requirements, she may have the ability to challenge the bill in court even before it becomes law.
To know more about congress visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28583709
#SPJ11
An employer properly brought a conversion action against an employee in federal district court sitting in diversity jurisdiction. The employee's answer contained an age discrimination counterclaim against his employer based on federal law. The answer was prepared, signed, and filed by the employee's attorney. The employee's attorney did not act in bad faith, but did not reasonably investigate the factual contentions made in the counterclaim. The employer's attorney filed with the court and served on the employee's attorney a motion to dismiss the counterclaim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The next day, the employer's attorney served a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 on the employee's attorney based on the failure to reasonably investigate the factual contentions contained in the counterclaim, but did not file this motion with the court. Twenty days later and prior to the court ruling on the dismissal motion, the employee's attorney filed a notice of dismissal with respect to the counterclaim.May the employer's attorney continue to pursue its motion for sanctions by filing it with the court?
Yes, the employer's attorney may continue to pursue their motion for sanctions by filing it with the court.
This motion must be filed within 21 days after the opposing party's notice of dismissal. However, if the court has already ruled on the dismissal motion, then the motion for sanctions is no longer allowed. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an attorney must conduct a reasonable investigation into the facts and law related to the claims made in a counterclaim or other legal action. If the attorney does not conduct this investigation, then the court may impose sanctions on the attorney.
to know more about attorney:
https://brainly.com/question/22471236
#SPJ11
Joe approached a provincial government clerk and applied to renew his licence to operate a heavy multi-axle truck on the highways. His application was refused. Which of the following would not be a ground upon which the decision of that clerk could be challenged?
a. The clerk noticed Joe had not completed continuing driving education, as required by regulation. b. The clerk owned his own large truck that operated in competition with Joe in the same small community. c. The clerk, who was the only one to have reviewed the evidence, left the decision up to his secretary to make. d. The clerk decided that not enough women were doing this kind of job, and since Joe was a man, the licence was not renewed to correct the imbalance. e. The clerk acted beyond the powers given him in the statute and regulations by considering matters not authorized in those enactments.
The option that would not be a valid ground to challenge the decision of the clerk is option c. The clerk, who was the only one to have reviewed the evidence, left the decision up to his secretary to make.
Option a provides a valid ground for challenging the decision because Joe's failure to complete the required continuing driving education is a legitimate reason for refusing the license renewal. Option b can also be a valid ground for challenge as it indicates a potential conflict of interest, where the clerk's ownership of a competing truck could have influenced the decision. Option d raises the issue of gender discrimination, which is a valid ground for challenging the decision. Option e suggests that the clerk acted beyond their authorized powers by considering unauthorized matters, which is another valid ground for challenge.
In contrast, option c is more of an administrative issue regarding the decision-making process. Although it may indicate a lack of proper delegation, it does not directly relate to the validity or legality of the decision itself.
To know more about gender discrimination
https://brainly.com/question/33257291
#SPJ11
passed in 1972, the comstock law legalized contraception for everyone, regardless of marital status.
1972 Birth control for single people is made legal by the Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird.
The use of techniques or equipment to avoid unintended pregnancy is known as birth control, also known by the names contraception, anticonception, and fertility control. Although birth control has been practiced since antiquity, modern times saw the development of reliable birth control technologies. Family planning includes making birth control options available and using them. Birth control availability may be restricted or discouraged in some cultures because they view it as immoral, unreligious, or politically unwise. For women who have particular medical issues, the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention offer recommendations on the safety of birth control techniques. The vasectomy for men and tubal ligation for women are the most efficient birth control options, along with intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implanted birth control. Then, a variety of hormone-based techniques such as oral pills, patches, vaginal rings, and injections are used. Physical barriers like condoms, diaphragms, and birth control sponges, as well as approaches to increase fertility awareness, are less efficient. Spermicides and male withdrawal before to ejaculation are the least efficient techniques. While sterilization is quite effective, it is typically not reversible; all other procedures are, usually as soon as they are stopped.
Learn more about Birth control here
https://brainly.com/question/19562621
#SPJ4