The process of generating organizational policies is now more properly referred to as "policy making."
Free corporations should adhere to policy 1, as doing so will provide applicants who belong to underrepresented groups or have disabilities an extra point. Because of this method, Free Corporation won't have to alter its hiring criteria or other factors like technical expertise, personality type, experience, and many others. Therefore, by awarding extra points, they are merely providing this group of individuals a competitive advantage over other individuals, and by doing so, they may gradually instil this group of individuals into the company's culture and performance. The union that represents the workers at the Miracle Medical research company has opted against bargaining with them about the hiring of more personnel because it is their choice and has nothing to do with breaking any local, state, or federal laws.
Learn more about Policy making here:
https://brainly.com/question/29765758
#SPJ4
examples of __________ crowds include sit-ins, marches, boycotts, blockades, and strikes.
Answer:
protesting
Explanation:
Those are all examples of protests.
The statement is completed as: ''Examples of protest crowds include sit-ins, marches, boycotts, blockades, and strikes.'' These crowds are organized and mobilized to express discontent or grievances.
Protest crowds are typically organized by social or political movements, interest groups, or individuals who seek to bring attention to a particular issue or demand social or political change. They can be either peaceful or violent, depending on the nature of the protest and the response of law enforcement or other authorities.
Protest crowds often utilize tactics such as civil disobedience, nonviolent resistance, or disruptive actions to draw attention to their cause and to pressure those in power to address their concerns. They can have a significant impact on public opinion and policy, and can sometimes lead to major social or political changes.
Overall, protest crowds are an important aspect of democratic societies, as they provide a means for citizens to voice their concerns and advocate for change. While they can sometimes be controversial or disruptive, they are an essential component of political and social activism.
See more about strikes (protest) at https://brainly.com/question/26933190.
#SPJ11
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
"Why are minorities (Predominately Black & Latino) arrested/incarcerated at a higher rate than other races"
Explanation:
Black and Latinx Americans in each state, identifies three contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in imprisonmentWhat is an arbitration decision called?
A. Judgment
B. Agreement
C. Award
D. Facilitator
Answer: C
Explanation:” This is like a judge's or jury's decision in a court case. Once the arbitrator decides that all of the parties' evidence and arguments have been presented, the arbitrator will close the hearings. Hope its right! Im pretty sure it is though
True or False. A police officer pointing his weapon at someone is not considered
deadly force.
True
False
Which federal statute forbids a registered accounting firm from providing specific nonaudit services to an audit client?.
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT forbids a registered accounting firm from providing specific non-audit services to an audit client.
What is the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT?A federal law from the United States enacted in 2002 called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires firms to follow specific procedures for maintaining financial records and reporting. The rule was implemented in response to many significant business and accounting scandals, notably Enron and WorldCom. The bill's provisions address the duties of the board of directors of public corporations, impose criminal penalties for specific types of wrongdoing, and call on the Securities and Exchange Commission to establish regulations outlining public businesses' legal obligations. The Act's provisions, such as the wilful destruction of evidence to obstruct a government investigation, also apply to privately held businesses.
To know more about the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT visit:- https://brainly.com/question/27915345
#SPJ4
Name two main reasons people chose to come to the American colonies.
A, to benefit from the colonies’ long summers and short winters
B.
to benefit from the colonies’ short summers and long winters
C.
to escape political unrest and a poor climate in England
D.
to seek religious freedom and economic opportunity
Answer:
it would be A and D
Explanation:
Well the truth is back in the day that's what people wanted to do.
is it ever ethical for a manager or subordinate to violate a psychological contract? What if violating a psychological contract may have negative consequences for some employees but benefit other employees?
While there may be circumstances where violating a psychological contract seems to benefit some employees, it is generally considered unethical due to the potential negative consequences on trust and employee well-being.
The ethicality of violating a psychological contract depends on various factors. Generally, it is not considered ethical for a manager or subordinate to intentionally violate a psychological contract.
Violating a psychological contract can lead to a breakdown of trust and negatively impact employee morale and engagement. It can result in employee dissatisfaction, decreased motivation, and potentially, higher turnover rates.
If violating a psychological contract could benefit some employees while negatively affecting others, it becomes a complex ethical dilemma. In such cases, it is essential for managers to consider the broader impact and strive for fairness and transparency.
To resolve this, managers can openly communicate the changes and reasons behind them, seek input from employees, and attempt to find solutions that balance the needs of both groups. Transparent and inclusive decision-making processes can help mitigate the negative consequences and maintain trust within the organization.
Learn more about ethical rules from this link:
https://brainly.com/question/30546664
#SPJ11
An example of procedural law is:
A.
A law prohibiting employment discrimination
B.
A law making stealing a crime
C.
A law requiring that a complaint be filed to begin a lawsuit
D.
A law requiring a person to be 16 years old to obtain a driver’s license
Answer:
I think it's letter C
Explanation:
Law that establishes the rules of the court and the methods used to ensure the rights of individuals in the court system.
Please vote me as the brainliest answer thanks
Do you think that marriage is different than merely being in love? Having a romantic relationship may help reduce crime; if so, what happens when the couple breaks up? Does that increase the likelihood of criminal involvement?
Answer:
I don't think marriage is different than being in love because you want to spend the rest of your life with that person. But I think if the couple breaks up there will be a slight chance to increase the likelihood of criminal involvement because breaking up is an intense emotion to feel
Discuss one way English Common Law has influenced our modern democratic institutions and procedures.
The right to one's own privacy may be traced back to English common law just as much as it can be found in the Constitution. This is one of the reasons why the 9th and 10th Amendments were included in the Constitution. They are around in part because of the common law that existed before it.
This is further explained below.
What is the right to privacy?Generally, The concept of an individual's inalienable right to privacy may be found in a number of different legal systems. This right is designed to put a stop to governmental and private acts that violate the privacy of persons. The right to one's privacy is recognized in more than 150 country constitutions.
In conclusion, the right of an individual not to have things of a personal nature made public against their will or to be the subject of intrusion by other people.
Read more about the right to privacy
https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ1
Explain to challenges that parole and probation officers face in their work
Answer:
we'll be there for the weekend so if you can make it
FILL IN THE BLANK. based on the 1981 u.s. supreme court decision in___, all states are required to provide k-12 education for undocumented immigrants and their children.
Based on the 1981 U.S. supreme court decision in Plyler v. Doe, all states are required to provide k-12 education for undocumented immigrants and their children.
According to Plyler vs Doe case, all the public schools were told not to charge fees from illegal immigrants for public education. It clearly stated that education is a primary necessity which must be provided to all the children. While education may not be a fundamental right under the US Constitution, education is included in the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. When the children of illegal immigrants could not provide the proof that they have entered the country under legal permission, they are forced to quit the school and also pay fees of the schooling.
Learn more about Plyler v. Doe at:
brainly.com/question/3191407
#SPJ4
2.1. Name and explain the purpose of one law/legislation that protects citizens
against the specific gender based violence
Answer:
Uniform
Explanation:
Growing up, we have all been taught the stereotypical clothing each person should wear. E.G, a few weeks ago in my English class we were having a debate about how till this day, most girls choose to wear skirts, even if there is the option of trousers. I just think that this is something that has grown with us, and i guess people will still be judgemental in the future elsewhere.
Jane Smith listed and sold a company’s building, for which the company paid her a fee. Which would be TRUE regarding this situation?
Answer: You did not give the answer choices
Explanation: I will answer this once you do
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
which term refers to the authority of a court to hear a case? a. precedent b. jurisdiction c. due process d. equal protection
Answer:
Jurisdiction
Explanation:
The term that refers to the authority of a court to hear a case is "jurisdiction."
pie in the sky aircraft inc. files a suit against quest engineering inc., claiming that the consideration for their contract is inadequate. the court will most likely not examine the adequacy of the consideration if_____
The court will most likely not examine the adequacy of the consideration if the parties agreed to the contract voluntarily and without coercion.
When two parties enter into a contract with the intention of creating a binding agreement, it is assumed that both parties were aware of the terms and implications of the contract and therefore, the court will not question the adequacy of the consideration.
It is assumed that both parties negotiated in good faith and entered the contract voluntarily. If either party was coerced or forced into entering the contract, the adequacy of the consideration can be examined by the court.
Additionally, if the terms of the contract are unconscionable, the court can examine the adequacy of the consideration.
To know more about binding agreement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29335454#
#SPJ11
18) ________ is a feature of law-governed society and involves having laws that are known and understood, along with the ability to appeal to higher authorities to ensure that the laws are applied correctly.
A) Liability
B) Due process
C) Responsibility
D) Accountability
E) The judicial system
A element of a society controlled by the law is due process, which entails having clear and well-understood laws as well as the right to appeal an incorrect application of the law to higher authorities.
In order to ensure that all of the person's legal rights are honored, due process of law requires the state to apply all relevant legal norms and principles. The strength of the law of the nation is balanced by due process, which also shields the individual from it.
The rule of law is violated when a government harms a person without strictly adhering to the letter of the law. This is known as a due process violation.
Learn more about Due process, from:
brainly.com/question/12176268
#SPJ4
(c) What are the similarities between the functions of the temple of Jerusalem and the church today?
The functions of the temple of Jerusalem and the church today share several similarities. Both serve as places of worship, where individuals can come together to pray and seek guidance from a higher power. They are also places where people can receive spiritual education and guidance through teachings and sermons.
In addition, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as places of community and social interaction. They provide opportunities for individuals to connect with others who share their beliefs and values. They are also centers for outreach and charitable work, serving the needs of the local community and beyond.
Moreover, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today emphasize the importance of rituals and traditions. They celebrate important religious holidays and events, providing a sense of continuity and connection with the past. Finally, both the temple of Jerusalem and the church today serve as symbols of faith and hope, reminding believers of the power of the divine and the promise of salvation.
For more such questions on church
https://brainly.com/question/28389583
#SPJ11
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
If the defendant successfully proves __________, no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence, the plaintiff will be denied any recovery of damages. a. negligence per se b. comparative negligence c. contributory negligence d. res ipsa loquitur
Answer:
c. contributory negligence
Explanation:
Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.
Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.
If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.
For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence
Tell the story of Trump Old Post Office v. Topo Atrio. Who had a
duty to mitigate in that case? What actions should that party take
in order to satisfy its duty to mitigate?
Donald Trump promised to make a move against gourmet expert Jos Andrs for leaving their eatery bargain at the Old Post Office after the Republican official up-and-comer offered generally reprimanded remarks on migrants.
On Friday, the Donald followed through on his promise. Trump Old Post Office LLC sued Andrs Think Food Group and an offshoot, Topo Atrio LLC, for $10 million and lawyers expenses, blaming them for two counts of break of agreement. The suit was documented in U.S. Region court for the District of Columbia
Andrs pulled out of the D.C. lodging bargain after Trump offered stigmatizing remarks about Mexican settlers during a June 15 discourse proclaiming his application for the Republican selection for president. The Spanish-conceived cook said recently that after those remarks, opening an eatery in Trumps inn was unthinkable, given his pleased worker legacy and that of a considerable lot of his representatives and visitors.
Work is in progress on the $200 million, 263-room Trump International Hotel, which was additionally expected to house a café from New York culinary expert Geoffrey Zakarian, however Zakarian likewise said recently he would pull out of the project. Think Food Group had a 10-year rent with Trump to work a lead eatery in the inn. However, as indicated by Trump's suit, Think Food Group told Trump's organization that his remarks abused the agreements of calm satisfaction and great confidence and reasonable managing.
The suit calls Andrs' response to Trump's comments "inquisitive," bringing up that the gourmet specialist said he respected Trump when the two declared the association in November.
"Mr. Andrs offense is interested considering the way that Mr. Trumps freely shared perspectives on movement have stayed reliable for a long time, and Mr. Trumps ability to honestly impart his insights is broadly known," the suit expressed.
The café bunch mentioned July 17 that Trump abjure his assertions and shun publicizing comparative articulations once more, as per the suit. That very day, Trump Old Post Office LLC had likewise informed Think Food Group that it was in default of its rent since it had not conveyed development records by June 29, as was spread out in the rent.
Trumps claim noticed that it is unquestionably hurtful to open a lavish inn without its arranged eatery, substantially less one going through development as will presently be required.
To know more about Donald Trump
brainly.com/question/30762825
#SPJ11
How does an Executive Order differ from a law?
A: Executive Orders are not limited by the Constitution.
B: Executive Orders do not need to be approved by Congress.
C: Executive Orders are limited to military and foreign affairs.
D: Executive Orders are not subject to judicial review.
Answer: B
Explanation: Laws must be approved by the President and by Congress. Executive Orders do not have to be double approved
The study of criminal law is the study of?
In Georgia: All children ___ years old or younger must be secured in the back seat and seated in an approved child restraint device when riding in a motor vehicle.
a. 5
b. 15
c. 21
Answer:
a. 5
Explanation:
Children up to 1 year old and at least 20 pounds should sit in the back seat of a car. Then they have to sit in the front row child seat by the age of 4 or weigh more than 40 pounds. Children under the age of 4 should be properly secured in the child control system on the back seat if possible. They must travel on a booster seat until they are 8 years old, weigh more than 80 pounds or stand 4 feet 9 inches tall. Violation of child control law is a standard offense. Children under the age of 8 must have seat belts in all seats. Children under the age of 8 and all seats may be at least 4 feet 9 inches. Violation of child control law is a standard offense.An applicant for a disability insurance policy has a heart condition of which they are unaware and they answer no to the question regarding to heart problems. Their answer is considered to be a? a. Warranty b. Concealment c. Fraudulent answer d. Representations
An applicant for a disability insurance policy has a heart condition of which they are unaware and they answer no to the question regarding heart problems. Their answer is considered to be a (d) Representation.
A representation is a statement made by the applicant during the application process, which is believed to be true to the best of their knowledge. In this case, the applicant is unaware of their heart condition, so their answer is not intentionally false or misleading.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. The applicant fills out a disability insurance application, which includes a question about heart problems.
2. The applicant is unaware of their heart condition, so they answer "no" to the question.
3. The insurance company relies on the information provided by the applicant to assess their risk and determine their eligibility for coverage.
4. The applicant's answer is considered a representation because it is a statement made by them, believing it to be true based on their current knowledge.
It is important to note that the answer is not considered a warranty, concealment, or a fraudulent answer. A warranty is a statement that is guaranteed to be true, and if found to be false, it could void the policy. Concealment refers to intentionally hiding or not disclosing a material fact during the application process.
A fraudulent answer is a deliberate misrepresentation of a material fact to deceive the insurance company. Since the applicant is unaware of their heart condition, their answer does not fall into any of these categories.
To know more about insurance policy refer here: https://brainly.com/question/16267577#
#SPJ11
When examining gender differences in status offenses, research shows that gils are
© A. taken into custody LESS often than are boys
O B, MORE likely to run away because of victimization in the home
O C, MORE likely to be considered incorrigible than are boys
O D, MORE llkely to be involyed in underage drinking than are boys
© E, MORE likely to be truant than are boys
During the examination of gender difference, research illustrates that girls are A. taken into custody less often than are boys.
What is gender difference?It should be noted that gender difference simply means the difference that exists between males and females.
In this case, when examining gender differences in status offenses, research shows that gils are taken into custody less often than are boys.
Learn more about gender on:
https://brainly.com/question/1087314
Ewan is a nonresident of California and holds a partnership interest in a California partnership. He received a Schedule K-1 from the California partnership that included net income of $10,000 from California sources. What amount of the distributive share of partnership net income is taxable by California?
Answer:
The amount of the distributive share of partnership net income that is taxable by California is the share of the partnership's net income of $10,000 that can be attributed to Ewan.
Assuming he holds a 50% interest in the partnership, he is expected to pay tax on his share of the $10,000 (which is equal to $5,000) in California, where the income is earned and not where he resides.
Explanation:
A partnership as an entity does not pay taxes. But individual partners must pay taxes on their shares of the partnership income, whether it is actually distributed or not. The partnership usually lists the partners' income on Schedule K-1, while individual partners fill the normal individual tax returns.
How do terrorists become radicalized and what does research suggest about radicalization?
Answer:
Radicalisation is when someone starts to believe or support extreme views, and in some cases, then participates in terrorist groups or acts. It can be motivated by a range of factors, including ideologies, religious beliefs, political beliefs and prejudices against particular groups of people.