The nurse should refer to the Nurse Practice Act (NPA) before initiating the intervention of administering an IV chemotherapeutic agent to a patient in the acute care setting.
The Nurse Practice Act is a state-level law that governs the practice of nursing within a specific jurisdiction. It outlines the legal scope of practice for different levels of nursing professionals, such as licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and registered nurses (RNs). The NPA defines the responsibilities, duties, and limitations of each level of nursing practice and ensures patient safety and quality care.
The NPA provides guidelines and regulations related to nursing practice, including the administration of medications, such as IV chemotherapeutic agents. It specifies the scope of practice for LPNs and the activities they are authorized to perform under the supervision or delegation of an RN or other authorized healthcare provider.
In this scenario, since the LPN is being asked by the RN to administer an IV chemotherapeutic agent, it is essential for both nurses to consult the Nurse Practice Act of their respective state. The NPA will provide specific information regarding the LPN's authority to administer IV medications and any additional requirements or restrictions that may be in place.
By referring to the Nurse Practice Act, the nurses ensure that they are adhering to the legal and regulatory standards governing their practice. They can verify the LPN's scope of practice, any necessary training or certifications, and any specific protocols or guidelines related to the administration of IV chemotherapeutic agents.
It is important for healthcare professionals to remain informed about the laws and regulations governing their practice to ensure patient safety, maintain professional standards, and avoid potential legal issues.
In summary, before initiating the intervention of administering an IV chemotherapeutic agent, the nurse should refer to the Nurse Practice Act of their state. The NPA provides guidelines and regulations that outline the scope of practice for different levels of nursing professionals and ensures compliance with legal and regulatory standards.
Learn more about Nurse Practice Act here
https://brainly.com/question/28346944
#SPJ11
A witness in a court case can never talk about the crime outside the courtroom.
O True
O False
Answer:
False.
Reason:
it seems to make sense that you can talk about the case out side the court room.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
If you drive under the influence, you
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person.
B. Will have to pay double the fine if you’re ticketed for speeding.
C. Are less likely to be injured in a collision.
D. I’m not committing a crime unless your BAL is .08 or higher
Answer:
the answer is a.
Explanation:
cuz you still arent 100 pecent paying attwntion
Answer:
A. Increase the risk of killing yourself or another person
Explanation:
While under the influence, you're not fully conscious or aware of your surroundings. That being said, driving is a task that acquires the driver to be conscious and to have awareness for their safety and the other driver's safety. If the driver is intoxicated, they risk a collision and killing people if the collison is deadly.
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
If a married couple decides to get a divorce, what kind of law will handle their case?
Answer:
In Shah Bano case, the Supreme Court held that, it is the responsibility of the husband during the divorce to make a reasonable and fair provision to maintain the former wife under Section 3(1Ha) of Muslim Women(Protection of rights on Divorce Act, 1986.
Answer:
Family law
Explanation:
Family Law court handles divorce, child support, child custody, and adoptions.
(3 points) Define a recursive Prolog rule(s) remove_them(Lst, N, Result) where Result is a list of the elements of the list Lst that are not members of the list N.
In order to define a recursive Prolog rule(s) \(remove_them(Lst, N, Result)\), where Result is a list of the elements of the list Lst that are not members of the list N, we need to define a base case and recursive case.
Let's define the base case: \(remove_them([], _, []).\)
Here, the empty list in the first argument indicates that we have reached the end of the list, so the function returns an empty list as well since there are no elements to remove.\(remove_them([H|T], N, Result) :-\)
Let's define the recursive case :
\(member(H, N), !, remove_them(T, N, Result).remove_them([H|T], N, [H|Result]) :- remove_them(T, N, Result).\)
In the first line, we check if the head of the list is a member of the list N using the member() predicate. If it is, we skip over that element and continue with the rest of the list by calling the function recursively.
In the second line, if the head of the list is not a member of the list N, we add it to the result list and continue with the rest of the list by calling the function recursively.
Now, if we call the function with a list Lst and a list N, the function will return a new list Result containing all the elements of Lst that are not members of N.
To know more about elements visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31950312
#SPJ11
When a psychologist simply records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a – study. The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable – the other. This is the – problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a – controlling both of the observed variables.
Answer:
The Correct approach will be "correlational, causes, directionality and third variable".
Explanation:
Correlational studies are little more than an investigation that is sometimes used throughout psychology as either a preparatory method for gathering information about a particular topic and within circumstances where it would not be sufficient to execute a research project.The method described in the previous section usually includes investigates the relationships between two or even more independent variables.Because then the answer is indeed the correct one.
The correlational studiesis a research where the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical relationship between them.
When psychologist records the relationship between two variables without manipulating them, it is called a correlational study.The observed relationship does not by itself reveal which variable causes the other and this is the directionally problem. Also, the relationship may be due to a third variable controlling both of the observed variables.Read more about correlational study
brainly.com/question/4272060
A purchaser of a $100,000 single-family home for her family refuses to close escrow after making a $10,000 deposit she is entitled to
Answer:
If a purchaser of a $100,000 single-family home for her family refuses to close escrow after making a $10,000 deposit, the specific legal rights and obligations of each party would depend on the terms of the purchase agreement and applicable state laws.
In general, when a buyer breaches a real estate purchase agreement by refusing to close escrow, the seller may have the right to terminate the agreement, keep the buyer's deposit as liquidated damages, and potentially sue for additional damages resulting from the buyer's breach.
However, before taking any legal action, the seller may first attempt to negotiate with the buyer or explore alternative solutions, such as offering to extend the closing date or reducing the purchase price. The seller may also need to comply with any notice or procedural requirements under the purchase agreement or state law before terminating the agreement and keeping the buyer's deposit.
On the other hand, if the seller breaches the purchase agreement by failing to deliver the property or clear title, the buyer may have the right to terminate the agreement and seek a refund of the deposit, as well as potentially sue for damages resulting from the seller's breach.
It's important for both parties to review and understand the terms of the purchase agreement and seek legal advice if necessary to ensure that their rights are protected and that any disputes are resolved fairly and efficiently
OJ Simpson's case is an example of both a civil case and a criminal case being brought for the same acts.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Pros and cons of the death penalty
Answer:
cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
pros: no prison
Explanation:
________ is effective because the majority of citizens recognize the importance of adhering to the law.
Law enforcement is effective because the majority of citizens recognize the importance of adhering to the law. The effectiveness of law enforcement relies on the voluntary compliance of individuals with the established legal framework within a society.
The recognition of the importance of adhering to the law by the majority of citizens creates a culture of compliance and respect for legal norms. When individuals understand and appreciate the significance of laws in maintaining social order, promoting justice, and protecting individual rights, they are more likely to willingly follow the law.
A society where the majority of citizens uphold the law reduces the burden on law enforcement agencies. It fosters a sense of shared responsibility and cooperation, as citizens become active participants in maintaining order and contributing to the well-being of the community.
However, it is important to note that the effectiveness of law enforcement also depends on other factors such as the clarity and fairness of laws, accessibility to legal resources, and the responsiveness of the justice system. These factors can influence the perception of legitimacy and contribute to the overall effectiveness of law enforcement efforts.
In conclusion, law enforcement is effective when the majority of citizens recognize the importance of adhering to the law. A culture of compliance and respect for legal norms fosters cooperation, reduces the burden on law enforcement agencies, and contributes to the overall maintenance of social order and justice in a society.
To know more about law refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32722579#
#SPJ11
Pioneer gangs related to Special Crime Investigation
Answer:
Explanation:
none
Which of the following is the best defense that a CPA can assert against common law litigation by a stockholder claiming fraud based on an unqualified opinion on materially misstated financial statements?
Answer
Contributory negligence on the part of the client.
Lack of gross negligence.
A disclaimer contained in the engagement letter.
Lack of due diligence.
The best defense that a CPA (Certified Public Accountant) can assert against common law litigation by a stockholder claiming fraud based on an unqualified opinion on materially misstated financial statements would be: Lack of gross negligence.
While each option may have some relevance, asserting the lack of gross negligence would be the most effective defense in this scenario. In a fraud claim, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff to establish that the CPA engaged in intentional or reckless misconduct. By asserting the lack of gross negligence, the CPA can argue that they did not exhibit a severe degree of negligence or intentional wrongdoing in conducting the audit. This defense acknowledges that there may have been misstatements, but asserts that they were not the result of the CPA's intentional or reckless actions. Other defenses such as contributory negligence, a disclaimer in the engagement letter, or lack of due diligence may have limited applicability or provide weaker grounds for defense in a fraud claim.
Learn more about gross negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/28288330
#SPJ11
HELP ASAP
State courts of original jurisdiction
A. hear appeals of previous trial decisions
B. hear cases about disputes over U.S. law
C. hear cases about the Constitution
D. hear trials for criminal cases and civil cases
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I think.
What did the espionage and Sedition Acts accomplish?
For criticizing the government or the war effort, a citizen could face fines or imprisonment under the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917-18. These activities have the advantage of getting rid of roadblocks to the war effort.
What happened to those who broke the law against seditious speech?The Sedition Act, which allows for the deportation, fine, or jail of anybody judged a threat or publishing "false, scandalous, or malicious literature" against the United States government, was passed by the House in one of the first trials of free speech.
Why did the majority of Americans dislike the Sedition Act?Politicians and American public disliked the Sedition Act because it violated the letter and spirit of the First Amendment, particularly the freedoms of speech and the press. Any "false, scandalous and hostile writing" directed at Congress or the executive branch was prohibited by the new law.
To know more about Espionage and Sedition Acts, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29613472
#SPJ4
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
the primary federal agency responsible for investigating counterfeiting is the
The Secret Service is the primary federal agency in charge of investigating counterfeiting.
The management of resources, financial oversight of industries, or issues pertaining to national security are all examples of special government organizations known as federal agencies. Although they may initially be established by presidential order, these organizations are typically established through legislative action.
Because Congress decided that a problem required regulatory oversight, a federal agency exists. An "enabling act," also known as an "organic act," and other specific legislative grants of power are given to an agency by Congress.
Learn more about Counterfeiting:
brainly.com/question/30736423
#SPJ4
Briefly discuss China’s separatist challenges in both Tibet and Xinjiang. How might
China’s experiences with Hong Kong and Taiwan have influenced its policies toward
these two regions?
There is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Why is Xinjiang is important for China?China's Belt and Road Initiative, a significant economic programme spanning Asia and Europe, includes Xinjiang as a key component.
Beijing wants to continue developing Xinjiang, which is home to China's greatest coal and natural gas reserves, and wants to do so by eliminating any chance of separatist action.
Ever since the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power in 1949, Xinjiang has been a part of China. There are Uyghurs who advocate for independence from China and refer to the area as East Turkestan.
Therefore, there is animosity toward the convergence and assimilation of Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland as well as the growing meddling in Hong Kong's internal affairs by the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
To know more about the Xinjiang aspect of China, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7178318
#SPJ1
Write a brief summary based on the constitutional issue for each of the following cases (do not include the "facts" of the case- just the constitutional argument- the "law" of the case):
Furman v Georgia
Gregg v Georgia
Coker v Georgia
McCleskey v Kemp
Ring v. Arizona
Atkins v Virginia
Roper v Simmons
Witherspoon v Illinois
Hurst v. Florida
In order to receive full credit, you must have: A) the most important constitutional issues that were argued in each case- B) who the courts supported, and C) why. Each case should have a minimum of six (6) sentences.
These cases are related to the criminal justice system of United States. The founding's of the supreme court in the form of constitutional arguments is highlighted.
Furman v. Georgia 1972 - The main constitutional question in this case was whether the death penalty was being applied in a way that violated the eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment by being applied in a discriminatory manner. The Supreme Court ruled that all current death penalty laws are unconstitutional after concluding that the death penalty is being used arbitrarily and capriciously.
Gregg v. Georgia 1976 - Whether the death penalty, as modified by the state of Georgia was constitutional was at issue in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that the revised death penalty statute was constitutional and did not contravene the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment because it provided for a segmented trial process with specific aggravating and mitigating factors.
The constitutional question in Coker v. Georgia (1977) was whether the death penalty was an appropriate sentence. The death penalty was deemed to be an excessive punishment for serious crimes by the Supreme Court, and it also violated the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
The main constitutional question in McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) was whether statistical proof of racial bias in the execution of death sentences was sufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove a constitutional violation.
Arizona v. Ring (2002) - In this case, the legal issue was whether the fact based determinations required to impose the death penalty must be made by a jury rather than a judge. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to impose the death penalty, factual findings must be made by a jury, not a judge, in accordance with the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial.
In 2002 Atkins v. Virginia The Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment was at issue in this case's constitutionality which involved the execution of defendants who had intellectual disabilities. Such executions, according to the Supreme Court, violated the Eighth Amendment and were therefore unconstitutional.
The main constitutional query raised in Roper v. Simmons 2005 was whether the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment applied to defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes. According to the Supreme Court it is unconstitutional to execute defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes.
The legal question in Witherspoon v. Illinois 1968 was whether potential jurors who expressed opposition to the death penalty could be barred from a capital trial. According to the Supreme Court, such jurors cannot be automatically disqualified rather, they can only be disqualified if their stance on the death penalty would prevent them from upholding the law and applying the death penalty when necessary.
Florida v. Hurst (2016) - The Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial was at stake in this case and it was unclear whether Florida's death penalty sentencing policy was constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the plan was unconstitutional because it gave a judge the authority to determine the facts necessary to impose the death penalty rather than a jury.
Learn more about supreme court at:
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
due to recent legislation and voter approval, the state of nevada court system now has a nevada court of appeals.
Due to legislation and voter approval, state of Nevada has established a Nevada Court of Appeals. This court serves as an intermediate appellate court, handling appeals from the state's district courts.
The establishment of the Nevada Court of Appeals aims to alleviate the caseload burden on the Nevada Supreme Court, allowing for more efficient and timely resolution of appeals. By creating an intermediate appellate court, the state seeks to streamline the judicial process and ensure fair and effective administration of justice. This court provides an opportunity for thorough review and consideration of cases, promoting consistency and accuracy in legal decisions.
The Nevada Court of Appeals consists of a panel of judges who are responsible for reviewing the decisions made by the district courts. Their role is to assess whether errors occurred in the application of the law, ensuring that legal principles are upheld and justice is served. This addition to the state's court system enhances access to justice by providing litigants with an additional avenue for recourse and resolution of legal disputes.
To know more about legislation click here : brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ11
judge bell has the legal duty to act in the best interest of juvenile offenders until they reach the age of 18. what is this legal duty called?
The legal duty that Judge Bell has to act in the best interest of juvenile offenders until they reach the age of 18 is called parens patriae.
What is parens patriae ?Parens patriae is a legal idea allowing the state to act as a surrogate parent or guardian for people who cannot take care of themselves or require protection.
In juvenile justice, this idea ensures that judges perform their duties in juvenile offenders' best interests, assuring them suitable supervision, care and treatment while preserving their rights and equitable and just disposition in the lawful system.
Find out more on legal duties at https://brainly.com/question/15185931
#SPJ1
How do we determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers?
Gender can play a significant role in determining the limits of our obligations to strangers.
Moral obligations of a Mother-For instance, moms usually shoulder the majority of the burden of parenting their children.
Do moms have different moral obligations than other people? Would you say that a mother leaving her own kids to feed malnourished children in Haiti goes beyond the bounds of moral obligation.
What happens when a mother from Haiti abandons her own children to look after rich children in the first world in order to provide assistance for her family back home.
Determinants of Moral Responsibility-1) The connection between the agent's actions and the harm that resulted; and 2) The morality of the action without consideration for the effects. Subjects' assessments of the agent's accountability were observed to vary in situations when these two features were at odds, particularly when the injury was not directly caused by the act that was held accountable.
Hence, we can say Gender can be used determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers.
To know more about Moral Obligations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31327835
#SPJ1
pursuant to the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u.s. constitution, if a law prevents individuals from exercising a fundamental right, the action will be subject to .
Pursuant to the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u.s. constitution, if a law prevents individuals from exercising a fundamental right, the action will be subject to strict scrutiny.
In U.S. sacred regulation, when a regulation encroaches upon a crucial established right, the court might apply the strict scrutiny standard. Strict scrutiny holds the tested regulation as hypothetically invalid except if the public authority can show that the law or guideline is important to accomplish a "convincing state revenue". The public authority should likewise exhibit that the law is "barely custom-made" to accomplish that convincing reason, and that it utilizes the "least prohibitive signifies" to accomplish that reason. Inability to fulfill this guideline will bring about striking the law as illegal.
The standard is the most elevated and generally severe norm of legal survey and is important for the degrees of legal investigation that courts use to decide if a sacred right or rule ought to give way to the public authority's revenue against recognition of the guideline. The lesser principles are reasonable premise survey and demanding or middle investigation. These principles are applied to rules and government activity at all degrees of government inside the US.
To know more about strict scrutiny,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/9128358
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
pursuant to the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u.s. constitution, if a law prevents individuals from exercising a fundamental right, the action will be subject to______.
Which of the following is true about Supreme Court justices?
Answer:
They are the country’s foremost authorities on the Constitution" is the only statement that is true, since these justices do not deal with state constitutions.
hope it helps
which level of state court would most likely decide a case related to running a red traffic light? general jurisdiction court limited jurisdiction court intermediate appellate court supreme court
Answer:
Limited Jurisdiction Court
Explanation:
Limited jurisdiction courts, often known as subordinate courts or municipal courts, primarily deal with minor offenses and violations like traffic violations. These courts have jurisdiction over specific types of matters and are frequently liable for traffic offenses such as red light running, speeding, or parking penalties.
Species A - took 23 hours for the egg to reach first instar and the eggs were collected from the scene and kept at a constant temperature of 78 degrees Fahrenheit. What was the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar?
The ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756.
What is ADH?
Accumulated degree hour (ADH) is the given amount of thermal energy which an egg-based animal or insect requires to develop from one stage to the next of its life, especially during the incubation period.
The formula for calculating ADH is given as:
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature).
Data and Calculations:Number of hours for the egg to reach the first instar = 23 hours
Storage temperature of the eggs = 78 degrees Fahrenheit
Number of hours at the second instar = 28 hours
Assumed minimum development temperature threshold for eggs = 51 degrees Fahrenheit
ADH = Time (hrs.) X (Average temp. – Minimum development threshold temperature)
= 756 {28 x (78 - 51)}
Thus, the ADH at 28 hours for the 2nd instar is 756. Though, ordinarily, an egg requires 1,890 ADH (70 x 27) to grow from the first instar to the 2nd instar.
Learn more about instar development at https://brainly.com/question/11659006
IF YOU BECOME ANGRY OR UPSET, YOU SHOULD: A. Control your emotions while driving B. Park the car and "cool down" before driving on C. Speed up so you can reach your final destination faster
Answer:
B. park the car and cool down
Explanation:
IF YOU BECOME ANGRY OR UPSET, YOU SHOULD control your emotions while driving. The correct option is a.
For the sake of your safety and the safety of other road users, it is crucial to maintain composure when you become angry or upset while driving. Allowing frustration or anger to influence your driving can result in aggressive behavior and sloppy judgment, which raises the possibility of accidents.
Instead, it's crucial to maintain your composure. Breathe deeply, keep your eyes on the road, and keep a positive attitude. If necessary you can also put stress relieving techniques into action while driving, such as relaxing music or breathing exercises.
In order to get where you're going faster, driving while angry or upset is neither safe nor responsible. It can result in careless driving and raise the risk of collisions. Always put safety first and keep your emotions under control when operating a vehicle.
learn more about driving here
brainly.com/question/2619161
#SPJ2
nothing is what make us something bars
Answer: not enough to make it out the hood LOL
Explanation:
Cathy was incarcerated because she has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren. She has been held in custody for an extended period after her incarceration term ended because she has the possibility of becoming violent, which is also known as:
Answer:
Preventative detention
Explanation:
Preventative detention is a form of incarceration that is given when the detained party is thought of as harmful to the society.
They are detained to prevent further acts of violence or crime in the community.in which they live.
In the given scenario Cathy has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren.
Releasing her will most likely lead to further abuse on the step children.
This was done to prevent further acts of violence from her.
______ theory holds that deviant and criminal behavior results from regular exposure to attitudes favorable to acting in ways that are deviant or criminal.
The theory that holds that deviant and criminal behavior results from regular exposure to attitudes favorable to acting in ways that are deviant or criminal is called "Social Learning Theory".
This theory posits that individuals learn how to behave through observation, imitation, and reinforcement of behaviors exhibited by those around them, including family members, peers, and media figures. According to social learning theory, if an individual is repeatedly exposed to deviant or criminal attitudes and behaviors, they may be more likely to adopt similar attitudes and engage in similar behaviors.Social Learning Theory was developed by Albert Bandura in the 1960s and 1970s. Bandura argued that behavior is learned through a process of observation and imitation, and that people are more likely to imitate behavior that is rewarded or reinforced in some way. He also suggested that behavior is influenced by factors such as cognition, motivation, and self-efficacy.
Social Learning Theory has been applied in a variety of contexts, including criminology and psychology. In criminology, the theory is often used to explain why some individuals become involved in criminal activities, while others do not. The theory suggests that exposure to deviant or criminal behavior may increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in similar behavior, and that prevention efforts should focus on reducing exposure to these behaviors.
Learn more about Social Learning Theory here;
https://brainly.com/question/22761112
#SPJ11