Answers
The legal signs of genocide, as defined by the United Nations Genocide Convention, include the intentional and systematic destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This can manifest in a variety of ways, including killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, refer to a broader category of atrocities committed against a civilian population. This can include acts such as murder, enslavement, torture, sexual violence, and forced displacement. Unlike genocide, crimes against humanity do not require an intent to destroy a specific group but rather are defined by the widespread and systematic nature of the attacks.
In summary, while both genocide and crimes against humanity involve serious violations of human rights and international law, genocide is distinguished by its specific targeting of a particular group for destruction, whereas crimes against humanity are defined by their widespread and systematic nature.
To know more about What is genocide- https://brainly.com/question/23582099
#SPJ11
The legal signs of genocide involve intentionally and systematically destroying a particular racial, ethnic, religious, or national group. According to the United Nations Genocide Convention, genocide includes acts such as killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, inflicting conditions designed to bring about the group's physical destruction, imposing measures to prevent births, and forcibly transferring children to another group.
Crimes against humanity, on the other hand, encompass a broader range of acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population. These acts include murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution, enforced disappearances, and other inhumane acts. While genocide targets explicitly a particular group intending to destroy it, crimes against humanity can be committed against any civilian population without the requirement of a specific intent to annihilate a particular group.
To distinguish between genocide and crimes against humanity, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the acts committed and the targeted population.
2. Determine if there is a specific intent to destroy a particular group (genocide) or if the acts are part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population (crimes against humanity).
3. Analyze the legal signs of genocide, such as the systematic nature of the acts and the specific methods used to destroy the group.
4. Compare the acts and intentions to the definitions of genocide and crimes against humanity under international law.
In conclusion, the main difference between genocide and crimes against humanity lies in the specific intent to destroy a particular group in the case of genocide. In contrast, crimes against humanity involve a broader range of acts against any civilian population. By analyzing the legal signs and the intentions behind the actions, it is possible to distinguish between these two grave international crimes.
To learn more about genocide, visit: https://brainly.com/question/4266491
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Whyis DNA fingerprinting used for in forensics?
OA.
to identify the place of crime
OB.
to identify the evidence
O c.
to identify the modus operandi
OD.
to identify the culprit
Answers
Fingerprint is used in forensics to identify the culprit.
What is forensics?This is a branch of science that is used by law enforcement agents to identify and manage crime situations.
The fingerprints of people are unique, and given that they are contained in a nations database, they are used to identify the people that committed a crime.
Read more on forensics here:
https://brainly.com/question/3049628
Answer:
A
Explanation:
community-oriented policing is a philosophy which promotes ___between law enforcement and community members.
A. Meditation
B. Distance
C. Partnerships
D. Regulation
Answers
Answer:
C.partnerships
Explanation:
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
4. What is the leading critique of the electoral college?
Answers
After all, that's how we run every other election in this country, says Jesse Wegman, the author of Let the People Pick the President
a. If you were the Garrett family's attorney, what arguments would you make at the trial? What
evidence would you want to introduce during the trial?
Answers
Answer:
Since Mrs Garrett had died suffering from lung cancer as a result of having been smoking cigarettes for 20 years, suing ABC Tobacco Company I'd have argued that it was these cigarettes from the aforementioned company that resulted in her developing a cancer of the lungs and subsequently dying from it. As evidence, I would present her medical reports that state clearly and without a shadow of doubt that the cause of death in her case was indeed lung cancer.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
The evidence that Garrett family's attorney should introduce during the trial is that Mrs. Garrett died of lung cancer.
Based on the complete information, it was stated that Mrs. Garrett dues from lung cancer due to the fact that she had been smoking cigarettes for quite a number of years.
Therefore, this will have been presented as evidence to sue ABC Tobacco company that it was the cigarettes that led to cancer that she had and the eventual death.
The medical report that showed that she had cancer should also be presented to support the claim.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/15558413
Donald is a very wealthy man. One day, Randy, the owner of a local gas station, compliments Donald on his new luxury car. Donald says: “Because you have given me such great service over the years, I will give you ownership of the car at the end of the week. Just fill up the gas tank.” Randy accepts and gives Donald the gas without charging for it. At the end of the day, Donald has second thoughts. Which of the following is the best answer?
Question 5 options:
A contract has been formed, because Randy’s service over the years is sufficient consideration for Donald’s promise to give the car.
A contract has been formed, because Randy accepted Donald’s offer.
No contract has been formed, because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car
No contract has been formed, because gas is not sufficient consideration for a car
Answers
Answer:
i think "no contract has been formed because consideration is lacking since the gas was not bargained for in exchange for the car"
Explanation:
thats a really weird question to be asked-
Which court is responsible for interpreting georgia law to determine if it is constitutional?.
Answers
The judicial branch of Georgia is responsible for interpreting Georgia law to determine if it is constitutional delivers justice through our legal system and interprets state laws.
What is the importance of the judicial branch?A law's interpretation, practical application, and compliance with the Constitution are all matters that fall under the purview of the judicial branch. The Constitution is our country's supreme law. The judicial branch includes the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the country's highest court.
Laws are enacted by the legislative branch. Laws are enforced by the executive branch. Laws are interpreted by the judicial branch.
Our legal system is administered by Georgia's judicial branch, which also interprets state legislation. The Georgia Supreme Court and Georgia Court of Appeals are the two appellate-level courts in our judicial system.
Learn more about The Judicial Branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/17479440
#SPJ4
odtient The
2. A galleries of without sking his partner has somethiscant in front of the team wila
his car is partner sets hit with the ball, losing an eye and wants to sue for negligence
4. A fan a wridgley gets hit down the 3rd baseline with a line drive and suffers a brain
Hemorrhage He was paying for a beer at the time
Answers
Answer:
Ben was going too fast when he hit a slick spot and lost control of the car.
Explanation:
The Cubs were leading 3-0 over the Florida Marlins.
The dying cancer patient problem 9.1
Answers
The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
What is assisted self-killing?Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.
Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.
Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.
Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4748133
#SPJ2
The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?
Which statement best describes a want?
O A. A want is something that would be nice to have.
O
B. A want is something that will help you save money.
O C. A want is something that will help you attain a goal.
D. A want is something that is necessary for survival.
Answers
Which of the following is not a strain that Agnew's General Strain Theory sees leading to crime?
a. negative associates
b. actual or anticipated removal of positively valued stimuli
c. blockage from desired goals
d. actual or anticipated presentation of negative or noxious stimuli
Answers
Among the following is not a strain that Agnew's General Strain Theory sees leading to crime is the actual or anticipated presentation of negative or noxious stimuli. Thus the correct option is D.
What is the objective of Agnew's General Strain Theory?According to Agnew's general strain hypothesis, there is now an understanding that situations that people regard as particularly bad are positively connected with a higher chance of engaging in a criminal action.
He makes an effort to illustrate how "strain" can result in criminal behavior. Negative elements like a criminal environment or criminal character qualities have an adverse effect on how well one handles stress.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about Agnew's General Strain Theory, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14681691
#SPJ1
A lawmaker helping a constituent obtain US citizenship is an example of
lobbying
Answers
????????????????????
If you are convicted of a DUI you could lose your life savings paying fines or restitution to the people that you have injured or killed.
a) true
b) false
Answers
Write five ‘would-you-rather’ questions about life and law in early America. Please help me come up with some ideas!!
Answers
Would you rather live in a small colonial town where everyone knows each other's business, or in a bustling 18th century city where anonymity is possible?
The four Questions are seen below
What are the ‘would-you-rather’ questions?Generally, Would you rather be a wealthy plantation owner with slaves, or a poor white farmer with few opportunities for upward mobility?
Would you rather be a member of a religious minority in early America, facing persecution and discrimination, or a member of the dominant religious group?
Would you rather be a colonial woman with limited legal rights, or a Native American facing forced displacement and cultural genocide?
Would you rather be a member of a colonial militia fighting in the American Revolution, or a loyalist forced to flee to Canada after the war?
Read more about colonial town
https://brainly.com/question/13459134
#SPJ1
if you driver license is revoked, you will be required to take and pass all driver examinations. true or false
Answers
It's true if you driver license is revoked, you will be required to take and pass all driver examination. Before they can be eligible for reinstatement of their driving boons.
A motorist license cancellation is a more severe discipline than a suspense, and generally results from serious business violations or felonious offence. In order to recapture their driving boons after a cancellation , individualities will generally be needed to complete all necessary examinations, which may include written tests, road tests, and vision tests, among others.
The specific conditions for reinstatement may vary depending on the state and the circumstances of the cancellation , but all individualities must demonstrate their capability as a motorist and their understanding of safe driving practices.
Passing all motorist examinations is an important step in this process, and is necessary for individualities to recapture their capability to fairly drive.
To learn more about Drivers Examination:
https://brainly.com/question/28272222
#SPJ4
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Answers
Firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
What constitutes firearms and their projectiles?A firearm is a type of weapon that uses gunpowder or other explosive materials to launch a projectile through a barrel. The projectile is the actual bullet that is propelled out of the gun when it is fired. There are several things that can be derived from both the firearm and its projectiles:
Forensic evidence: Firearms and their projectiles can leave behind valuable forensic evidence at a crime scene. This evidence can be used to identify the type of gun used, the direction from which the shot was fired, and the trajectory of the bullet.
Ballistics: The study of the behavior of bullets and projectiles is known as ballistics. Ballistics can be used to determine the velocity, trajectory, and impact of a bullet, as well as the damage it can cause.
Weapon identification: Firearms and their projectiles can be used to identify the type of weapon used in a crime. This can help law enforcement officials to track down the perpetrator.
Ammunition analysis: Analysis of the ammunition used in a firearm can provide clues about the person who fired the gun. For example, the type of ammunition used can indicate the level of skill or training of the shooter.
Criminal investigations: Firearms and their projectiles can be an important piece of evidence in criminal investigations. They can be used to link suspects to crimes, provide evidence of motive, and help to build a case against a defendant in court.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide valuable information to law enforcement officials, forensic scientists, and criminal investigators.
learn more about firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/31180996
#SPJ1
The authors of your text provide the example of the most recent war in Iraq to demonstrate the dangers of what can happen when political leaders __________.
Answers
The authors of the text provide the example of the most recent war in Iraq to demonstrate the dangers of what can happen when political leaders rush to make decisions without fully considering the consequences.
They argue that the Iraq War was a classic example of what can happen when leaders ignore evidence and rush to war without fully exploring alternative options or considering the potential long-term consequences of their actions. This led to a protracted conflict that caused significant human suffering, strained international relations, and ultimately failed to achieve its intended goals. The authors emphasize the importance of thoughtful, evidence-based decision-making in avoiding such catastrophic outcomes in the future.
To know more about Iraq click here:
brainly.com/question/23796629
#SPJ4
removal from office follows in the house of representatives and a conviction of guilt in the by a vote of .
Answers
According to the Constitution, the Senate must convict a suspect by a two-thirds vote in order to remove the person from office after a conviction. The Senate has in some instances also barred these individuals from entering public office in the future.
What is impeachment?It is a procedure for forcing out powerful government figures. All civil officers (federal judges), including the president and vice president, shall lose their positions upon impeachment. any treason, bribery, or other serious crimes or offenses convicted.
The House of Representatives has the authority to impeach—officially charge—any federal officer who violates the law or behaves unlawfully in any other way.
Article II, Section 4 states that upon impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other grave crimes and misdemeanors, the President, Vice President, and other civil officers of the United States shall be removed from Office.
The Senate is the exclusive court for impeachment trials under the Constitution, which gives the House of Representatives exclusive authority to remove a public person.
To know more about The Senate please click here https://brainly.com/question/29613389
#SPJ4
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, Xavier learned to hotwire cars in order to get them started. He and his friends would look for an unlocked car, hotwire it, and go for a joyride if they were bored. He gathered knowledge on many kinds of cars. If given the opportunity, Xavier could take almost any car on the street he wanted. Into what class of criminal would Xavier MOST likely fall?
professional thief
persistent thief
shoplifter
occasional offender
Answers
The kind of Criminal that Xavier is going to be classified as going by this narrative is a persistent thief.
Who is a persistent thief?
This is a person that is known to continue stealing people's properties even though they have been successful before.
Unlike the professional thief, they do not steal in order to get paid. They continue in crime even though they may have tried to stop.
Read more on thieves here: https://brainly.com/question/26019827
what is constitutionalism means?
Answers
Answer:
a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed
in what case did the supreme court rule that the defendant does not have a right to receive a copy of the presentence investigation report?
Answers
In what case did the supreme court rule that the defendant does not have a right to receive a copy of the presentence investigation report Willems v. New York.
What could be found in a report on a presentence investigation?Generally speaking, the presentence report must include information about the alleged crime as well as the defendant's past criminal activity. The PSI must also include information about the defendant's health, finances, employment history, military experience, and family and personal background.
What does the presentence investigation report serve as?The most crucial document in the federal criminal procedure has been referred to as the presentence investigation report. Even while its major objective is to aid the court in choosing the proper sentence, its significance in decision-making following the conviction cannot be understated.
To Know more about Willems v.
https://brainly.com/question/5212542
#SPJ4
how does the rule of law support the ideas of the preamble
Answers
Answer: REWORD BELOW
The rule of law is essential to achieving the goals set forth in the preamble of the Constitution. Without the rule of law, the government cannot establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, or secure the blessings of liberty.
Discuss the effect of company law on enterprise development. 1. Word number requirements: （1） At least 1000 words （2）The main contents of this paper include: title, body of the text, references 2. The paper is required to analyze the relevant knowledge learned in the Economic law course. Please give me an advanced analysis of the above-mentioned topic " Discuss the effect of company law on enterprise development. ". According to Economic Law. Thank you.
Answers
Company law provides the legal framework for the formation, operation, and management of companies. The effect of company law on enterprise development is the establishment of a stable and predictable legal environment.
Company law plays a crucial role in the development of enterprises by providing a legal framework for their formation, operation, and management. This framework creates a stable and predictable environment for investment, as it establishes clear rules and standards for the conduct of business. This predictability and stability help to foster the growth of enterprises by attracting investment and promoting entrepreneurship.
Furthermore, company law protects the interests of investors by setting out their rights and obligations, providing mechanisms for dispute resolution, and ensuring that companies are held accountable for their actions. This protection helps to build investor confidence and promotes the flow of capital into the economy.
Overall, the effect of company law on enterprise development is to create a legal environment that is conducive to investment and entrepreneurship, promotes growth, and protects the interests of investors. This, in turn, contributes to the development of a strong and vibrant economy.
To know more about the Company law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32786960
#SPJ11
Which statement best describes both the positive and negative effects
lobbyists have on the democratic process?
O A. Lobbyists give small groups a voice in U.S. politics but may
influence lawmakers to support policies that do not benefit the
public in general.
O B. Lobbyists make the role of money in politics more transparent but
allow the majority to more easily deny rights to vulnerable minority
groups.
C. Lobbyists help voters learn more about candidates for office, but
prevent third parties from successfully challenging the two-party
system.
D. Lobbyists help political leaders spread their messages to voters,
but rely heavily on donations from corporations and super PACS.
Answers
A. Lobbyists provide a platform for small groups to become part of U.S. politics, yet their sway may cause legislators to back policies that do not offer collective gain.
How to find the best descriptionOption A accurately characterizes both the upside and downside of lobbyists on participatory democracy. On one hand, they can give smaller factions representation in legislative matters, allowing them to express concerns and participate in governmental deliberations.
Nevertheless, the detrimental consequence is that lobbyists may endeavor to push measures that are contrary to more universal interests, yet benefit those actors and organizations they address or serve.
Learn more about democratic process at
https://brainly.com/question/29798216
#SPJ1
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people
Answers
An eight-year-old girl was playing catch on the sidewalk with her friend when her friend made an errant throw over the girl's head. The ball hit a pedestrian, who was walking on the sidewalk in the other direction. The pedestrian angrily threw the ball into the street. The girl ran out into the street to retrieve it and was hit and seriously injured by a car. If the girl's guardian considers legal action on her behalf against the pedestrian and the driver of the car, which of the following best states the pedestrian's liability?
A. The girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence.
B. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain contribution from the pedestrian.
C. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, but the driver may obtain indemnity from the pedestrian.
D. The girl has no claim against the pedestrian, and the driver will not be able to obtain contribution or indemnity from the pedestrian.
Answers
The pedestrian may be held liable for negligence, and the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian.
What is the basis for the pedestrian's potential liability and the girl's claim against them?In this scenario, the pedestrian may be considered negligent for angrily throwing the ball into the street, creating a hazardous situation. Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. By throwing the ball into the street, the pedestrian potentially breached their duty of care towards others on the sidewalk, including the eight-year-old girl.
As a result of the pedestrian's negligent act, the girl suffered serious injuries when she ran out into the street to retrieve the ball and was hit by a car. The pedestrian's action directly contributed to the chain of events leading to the girl's injuries.
Therefore, the girl may have a personal injury claim against the pedestrian for negligence, seeking compensation for her injuries, medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages resulting from the accident.
Learn more about: negligence
brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
Which 1948 Supreme Court decision supported the hands-off doctrine?
Answers
Answer:
Price v. Johnston
Explanation:
1948-supported hands-off doctrine, saying prison inmates must expect that part of their punishment for their crime is the loss of freedoms that free citizens take for granted
Assume a loan balance of 174000 a monthly payment of 1395
Answers
Answer:
What do you want me to do?
Help me please I need to pass
Answers
The court will reduce the plaintiff's award by his or her own percentage of fault. * True False Legislation is available pertaining to sole proprietorship and also may need to obtain business license and register trade name. True False Articles of Incorporation are filed separately with Notice of Directors and Notice of Address. True False The statutory definition of partnership covers people who expressly intend to be partners as well as people who may not necessarily intend to be partners but act as if they are partners. True False
Answers
1. True
It is true that the court reduces the plaintiff's award by his or her own percentage of fault. This is known as comparative negligence.
2. True
It is true that legislation is available pertaining to sole proprietorship and also may need to obtain a business license and register the trade name.
3. False
It is false that articles of incorporation are filed separately with Notice of Directors and Notice of Address.
4. True
It is true that the statutory definition of partnership covers people who expressly intend to be partners as well as people who may not necessarily intend to be partners but act as if they are partners.
To know more about proprietorship visit:
brainly.com/question/32997613
#SPJ11