application of computer modelling in beams​

e. Everything is correct in the given following ways. Additionally, it encourages students to take charge of their own writing process.

The process essay is a piece of writing that details how something is done or how it operates step-by-step. In order to write a successful process essay, you must provide the crucial steps in the process, describe each step in depth, and arrange the steps logically (usually chronological).

A call to action is part of a conclusion. It restates the thesis statement from the introduction, highlights the supporting details, offers any inferences based on those details, and brings a written composition to a logical conclusion.

Learn more about writing process here:

brainly.com/question/17000723

#SPJ4

In the provided choice, each of the following statements is true. It also motivates students to control their own writing processes. Hence the correct option is (e)

A process essay is a piece of writing that explains step-by-step how something is done or how it functions. You must include the key steps in the process, thoroughly describe each step, and logically arrange the steps in order to produce an effective process essay (usually chronological).

A conclusion includes a call to action. It restates the introduction's thesis statement, emphasises any supporting information, provides any inferences based on that information, and leads a written composition to a logical conclusion.

To know more about essay, click the below link

https://brainly.com/question/20426054

#SPJ4

Answer:

The main idea is quite literally the main idea of your essay/paper.

if your essay is about how sea turtles are being affected by plastic straws, that’s your main idea.

your supporting details are the things that are supporting your argument!

Explanation:

Generally speaking, most stories are written using either first, second, or third person--the points of view and characters' perspectives are not mixed throughout a story. ... When using multiple points of view in a story, many authors may switch between first person and third person to help contrast the points of view.

The detail from this paragraph that suggests that this article would not be a good source for Melanie is: "There is no evidence of any link between dinosaurs and birds, so the many scientists who claim there is are either lying or do not understand basic science."

For more questions on Melanie :

https://brainly.com/question/31297469

#SPJ8

The evidence from the text that leads me to believe that the main character of "Top of the Food Chain" is an unreliable narrator is option C. He makes excuses and says he couldn't predict the problems that would arise.

Throughout the story, the main character recounts the events that unfold when a pesticide called DDT is introduced to a small town. Initially, he presents himself as a knowledgeable and authoritative voice, providing facts about the number of cats imported and demonstrating expertise in the subject matter (option D). However, as the narrative progresses, it becomes clear that he is unreliable.

The main character constantly makes excuses for the unexpected and disastrous consequences of the pesticide. He claims he couldn't predict the problems that would arise (option C). This suggests a lack of foresight and accountability on his part. Rather than acknowledging his own role in the situation or taking responsibility for the damage caused, he shifts the blame to external factors.

Furthermore, the main character's sympathetic portrayal of the people's suffering (option A) may be seen as an attempt to deflect attention from his own shortcomings. By evoking pity in the audience, he manipulates their emotions to distract them from his own culpability.

Overall, the main character's excuses and deflection of responsibility indicate that he is an unreliable narrator, undermining the trustworthiness of his account and raising questions about his credibility.

Know more about the Top of the Food Chain here:
https://brainly.com/question/31741128

#SPJ8

As in the difference between natural science and social science is referred, to as natural science is the branch of science that deals with the natural world.

The term Nature refers that the broadest sense of was physical world or universe. "Nature" can refer to the phenomena of the physical world, and also to life in general. The study of nature is a large, if not the only, part of science.

As in the other hand, The term social science was referred to a branch of science that is referred to deal with human society as well as social relationships. As we study the social life of humans.

Therefore, As a result, They both have their differences and similarities.

Learn more about nature here:

https://brainly.com/question/23250589

#SPJ9

Answer:

I think it is C

Explanation:

sry If I am wrong

Answer: (D the poet )

Explanation:

hope this helps

The absence of purpose and materialism  are two aspects of modern life the speaker himself .

The lake Isle of Innisfree is evident as the narrator wishes to go to a remote cabin in the woods and essentially live off the land while depriving himself of human contact and engaging with nature. No mention of faith is made in the passage, neither is there any concepts of turmoil that the narrator makes note of. Instead, he talks of his willingness to maneuver to Innisfree, to measure in a cabin simply, as he views it as his purpose.

A main message  in “The Lake Isle of Innisfree”, is nature versus civilization. What we value in life is generally  the exact opposite of what civilization brings with it. Nature allows us to explore the various  forms of life but civilization has a certain set of rules with which we have to adjust .

The moral values depicted within the Lake Isle of Innisfree  is: Poet yearns for a natural retreat where he will live in peace. Through this poem depicts that this world is full of dirt and noise. Lastly, through this poet highlights the moral value of appreciating the natural great thing about nature.

Learn more about Lake Isle of Innisfree :

brainly.com/question/13197051

#SPJ9

52,275 more people visited the zoo in February compared to June.

In February, the number of visitors to the zoo was 75,060, while in June, the number decreased to 22,785. To determine how many more people visited in February than in June, we need to calculate the difference between the two numbers.

By subtracting the June visitors from the February visitors, we can find the answer:

75,060 - 22,785 = 52,275

Therefore, 52,275 more people visited the zoo in February compared to June.

During the month of February, the zoo welcomed a total of 75,060 visitors, while in June, the number of visitors significantly dropped to 22,785.

By subtracting the June visitor count from the February visitor count, we find that there were 52,275 more visitors in February than in June. This substantial difference highlights the variation in popularity between the two months.

It could be attributed to various factors, such as weather conditions, school holidays, or special events that attracted more visitors in February.

Analyzing visitor statistics allows zoo management to gain insights into the patterns and trends, aiding in planning and making informed decisions regarding resource allocation, marketing strategies, and facility improvements to enhance visitor experience.

Understanding visitor behavior and preferences is crucial for zoos to maintain their appeal and ensure the well-being of the animals under their care.

For more such questions zoo,click on

https://brainly.com/question/23857643

#SPJ8

The probable question may be:

The number of people who visited a zoo during February was 75,060 and during June was 22,785. Find how many more people visited in February than in June? ​

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I think it would be C because it makes sense not only that but it is a true statement. Also, I am just now taking a quiz about it.

The statement that best expresses a theme of "Gumption" is:

According to the events of the book Gumption, we are told by the narrator that a well qualified man Sylvester is denied a job by the government, despite his best efforts. He is helped out by his father, who fights the government to make sure that justice is served.

As a result of this, this clearly shows the theme that a person must be courageous if he wants to succeed.

Therefore, the correct answer is option C

Read more  here:

https://brainly.com/question/7244420

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Read the article 'Battle of the Bionics,' by Steve Murray (MUSE Magazine October 2016)

Which is the central idea of the text battle of bionics.

Answer:

The central idea is that the Cybathlon is more than a competition because it aims to promote the development of new engineering approaches to help people with physical disabilities while also creating awareness about them.

Explanation:

That´s why “Redefining Ability,” according to the author, is a slogan that perfectly expresses the essence of this event.

Answer:

Deindividuation is a psychological phenomenon that causes people to become less self-aware and more likely to behave impulsively. It affects the way we think, feels, and act when in groups of people or crowds. Deregulation can make someone feel like what they do doesn’t matter, which is why it might make them do things that are bad.

Explanation:

The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for Naveed Computers is approximately 14.2%.

To calculate the WACC, we need to determine the weight of equity and the weight of debt in the capital structure of Naveed Computers, as well as the cost of equity and the cost of debt.

Calculate the weight of equity:

The total book value of the firm's equity is $12 million. We can calculate the number of shares as the total equity divided by the book value per share:

Number of shares = Total equity / Book value per share

Number of shares = $12 million / $22

Number of shares ≈ 545,454.55 shares

The market value of equity can be calculated as the number of shares multiplied by the stock price:

Market value of equity = Number of shares × Stock price

Market value of equity = 545,454.55 shares × $32

Market value of equity = $17,454,545.44

The weight of equity is the market value of equity divided by the total market value of the firm's capital:

Weight of equity = Market value of equity / (Market value of equity + Market value of debt)

Weight of equity = $17,454,545.44 / ($17,454,545.44 + $6,600,000)

Weight of equity ≈ 0.7253 (or 72.53%)

Calculate the weight of debt:

The market value of debt is the selling price of the bonds, which is 110% of the face value:

Market value of debt = Face value of bonds × 110%

Market value of debt = $6 million × 1.10

Market value of debt = $6.6 million

The weight of debt is the market value of debt divided by the total market value of the firm's capital:

Weight of debt = Market value of debt / (Market value of equity + Market value of debt)

Weight of debt = $6,600,000 / ($17,454,545.44 + $6,600,000)

Weight of debt ≈ 0.2747 (or 27.47%)

Calculate the cost of equity:

The cost of equity is given as 16%.

Calculate the cost of debt:

The yield to maturity on the bond is 9%.

Calculate the WACC:

WACC = (Weight of equity × Cost of equity) + (Weight of debt × Cost of debt) × (1 - Tax rate)

WACC = (0.7253 × 16%) + (0.2747 × 9%) × (1 - 0.40)

WACC ≈ 0.117 (or 11.7%) + 0.025 (or 2.5%)

WACC ≈ 0.142 (or 14.2%)

Therefore, the WACC for Naveed Computers is approximately 14.2%.

For more such questions on WACC , click on:

https://brainly.com/question/25566972

#SPJ8

to provide background details about the commission and those who participated in the earthquake study.

The Lawson report contains a wealth of images of destroyed structures, thorough maps of their positions, and information gathered from surveys of the earth's movement during the earthquake along the San Andreas fault.

It is written in a modern language. It is written in the same way that we speak, without the use of any specific metaphorical language. The goal is to inform others about various incidents that, in the accounts of eyewitnesses who saw them, actually occurred.

To know more about The Scientific Revolution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18140730

#SPJ4

Answer:

She turned a page in her book that I read.

Explanation:

The effect of the first-person point of view in this excerpt is that Readers receive a good representation of what was considered healthy food in Elizabethan England.

This refers to the perspective or viewpoint that is used to narrate a story for better understanding.

Hence, we can see that The effect of the first-person point of view in this excerpt is that Readers receive a good representation of what was considered healthy food in Elizabethan England.

Read more about first-person point of view here:

https://brainly.com/question/18395445

#SPJ1

Answer:

Readers receive a good representation of what was considered healthy food in Elizabethan England.

Explanation:

Answer:2-=2=2=2=2=-3-5o

Explanation:

because it is valid and i need to answer questions don't use it.

The 3 ways in which the local government should provide services that promote safe and healthy living are:

The work of protecting our community's environment can be done through the use of good public transportation and also some recycling programs.

Local governments can help by monitoring the day-to-day operations so as to reduce energy consumption, paper, greenhouse gas etc.

Learn more about government  from

https://brainly.com/question/1078669

1. The dog barked loudly. 2. She is reading a book. 3. They laughed at the joke. 4. The car crashed into the wall. 5. He fell asleep.

1. The dog barked loudly.

  - The verb in this sentence is "barked."

  - It is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object. The action of barking is complete on its own without affecting any other object.

2. She is reading a book.

  - The verb in this sentence is "reading."

  - It is a transitive verb because it requires a direct object, which is "a book." The action of reading is directed towards the book.

3. They laughed at the joke.

  - The verb in this sentence is "laughed."

  - It is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object. The action of laughing is complete on its own without affecting any other object.

  - The prepositional phrase "at the joke" provides additional information about the action.

4. The car crashed into the wall.

  - The verb in this sentence is "crashed."

  - It is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object. The action of crashing is complete on its own without affecting any other object.

  - The prepositional phrase "into the wall" provides additional information about the action.

5. He fell asleep.

  - The verb in this sentence is "fell."

  - It is an intransitive verb because it does not require a direct object. The action of falling is complete on its own without affecting any other object.

  - The word "asleep" describes the state resulting from the action.

For more such questions on reading, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24716030

#SPJ8

However, there are some tips to identify fake news-

- Check the history and character of the author and publication

- Be leery of sensational captions

- Precisely check prints and other media that accompany the stories

- Consider the reasons why this person is participating in this news with you at this time

- Make sure the story isn’t intended to create a humbug.

To learn more about humbug here

https://brainly.com/question/30553382

#SPJ1

A third-person omniscient narrator is able to provide insight into the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters in a story, which helps to provide a broader perspective and deeper understanding of the events that unfold.

When a story is told from a third-person omniscient point of view, the narrator has access to the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters in the story. Here are some clues that can help you identify if a narrator’s point of view is third-person omniscient:

1. The use of pronouns “they” and “she”: If the narrator refers to characters using these pronouns, it suggests that the narrator is not limited to the thoughts and feelings of just one character.

2. The use of pronoun “I”: If the narrator uses the first-person pronoun “I,” it suggests that the narrator is a character in the story and not an omniscient narrator.

3. Thoughts and feelings of Lizzie limited: If the narrator only shares Lizzie’s thoughts and feelings, it suggests that the narrator is limited to her perspective and not omniscient.

4. Thoughts and feelings of Turner limited: Similarly, if the narrator only shares Turner’s thoughts and feelings, it suggests that the narrator is limited to his perspective and not omniscient.

5. Thoughts and feelings of both Lizzie and Turner: If the narrator shares the thoughts and feelings of both Lizzie and Turner, it suggests that the narrator has access to multiple characters’ perspectives and is therefore third-person omniscient.

Overall, a third-person omniscient narrator is able to provide insight into the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters in a story, which helps to provide a broader perspective and deeper understanding of the events that unfold.

For more such questions on omniscient

https://brainly.com/question/1597757

#SPJ8

The conclusion  from Levitt and Dubner’s Freakonomics is that “personal mood seems to affect honesty” is best supported by stressful fall and winter holidays generally cause payment rates to drop, hence option B is correct.

In their book Freakonomics, authors Levitt and Dubner discuss how to apply economic theories and principles to daily life and a variety of social problems. Stressful fall and winter holidays mostly cause payment rates to drop.

To make complicated economic topics understandable to a broad audience, the authors combine data analysis with storytelling. The book went on to become a bestseller, making behavioral economics more well-known.

Learn more about Freakonomics, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23619199

#SPJ1

Answer:

boom is the sound of  

Explanation:

thunder ok

The writer address the counterargument to appear fair-minded and trustworthy, to identify weaknesses in your argument and to anticipate objections to your argument.

By using counterargument, often known as foreseeing objections, writers do this. Writers are able to acknowledge the intricacy of their subject while yet maintaining a strong feeling of their own perspective by doing this.

By accepting the opposing argument's legitimacy, you concede that it might be true, but you then challenge all or part of it, which strengthens your case and makes a logos-based appeal.

To know more about counterargument visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/27924306

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. "Then I tied all his arms and legs in knots"

2. "I had to arm wrestle for it"

Number 1 was humorous because Stormie tangled all his tentacles in knots so he can't move.

Number 2 was humorous because he arm wrestled an old octopus to get the anchor himself.

Answer:

The painting causes feelings of sadness and sorrow in whom ever looks a the painting. The dark shades of blue really emphasize the feelings of sadness because blue is usually associated with sadness and despair. In addition to the dark colors the man has an arched and crooked kind of posture indicating that he is not content with his situation. His facial expression is also a key indicator that he is not in the best mood.

Explanation:

have great day

Answer:

Gachet is one of the most revered paintings by Vincent van Gogh. It depicts Dr. Paul Gachet who took care of Van Gogh during the final months of his life.

Explanation: Hope this helps

Machiavelli makes the case that new rulers can act cruelly using rational justification.

They contend that while a king who is despised is less likely to hold onto power, one who is feared can. Scientific research serves as the foundation for empirical evidence. He contends that fear is a more powerful motivator than love, making it the best weapon for leaders. According to Machiavelli, it is preferable for a ruler to be universally feared rather than deeply loved since the former maintains power via duty and the latter through dread of retribution. Machiavelli emphasized the "necessity" of employing harsh force or trickery deliberately, even the annihilation of entire noble families, to preclude any prospect of a challenge to the prince's power in his capacity as a political theorist.

To know more about Machiavelli visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15778425

#SPJ1