The country that has a uniquely in-between situation with some unitary aspects and notable decentralization is Japan.
The country that has a uniquely in-between situation with some unitary aspects and notable decentralization is Japan. While Japan is officially classified as a unitary state, it has strong regional governments with significant power and autonomy. The federal system is not widely used in Japan, but the country's decentralized system is often considered to be a hybrid of unitary and federal structures.
Learn more about unitary here
https://brainly.com/question/3558587
#SPJ11
The country that has a uniquely in-between situation when it comes to the unitary versus federal classification of states is Vietnam. Option D
Vietnam has a unitary system of government, which means that the central government holds most of the power. However, Vietnam also has notable decentralization, which means that power is shared with regional governments.
In Vietnam, the Communist Party holds ultimate power, and the National Assembly serves as a legislative body. The country is divided into 58 provinces and five municipalities, with each province having its own People's Council and People's Committee. These bodies are responsible for local governance and decision-making, such as budgeting, infrastructure development, and social welfare programs.
Vietnam's system of decentralization has been a deliberate policy choice, as the country seeks to balance the need for centralized control with the benefits of local decision-making. This approach has helped Vietnam to achieve impressive economic growth in recent years, as local governments have been empowered to attract investment and develop their own economies.
Overall, Vietnam's system of governance is unique in its combination of unitary and decentralized elements, and serves as an interesting case study for other countries seeking to strike a balance between centralization and local autonomy. Therefore option D is correct.
For more such questions on federal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28430584
#SPJ11
According to age-graded life-course theory, a teen who was abused as a child will likely have _______.
Joshua Gnaizda received an envelope in the mail from Time, Inc. The front of the envelope contained two see-through windows partially revealing the envelope's contents. One window
showed Joshua's name and address. The other revealed the following statement: "JOSHUA A. GNAIZDA, I'LL GIVE YOU THIS VERSATILE NEW CALCULATOR WATCH FREE JUST FOR OPENING THIS ENVELOPE BEFORE FEBRUARY 15, 1985." Beneath the offer was a picture of the calculator watch itself. Joshua's mother opened the envelope and realized she had been deceived by a ploy to get her to open a piece of junk mail. The see-through window had not revealed the full extent of Time's offer. Printed below the picture of the calculator watch, and not viewable through the see-through window, were the following additional words: "AND MAILING THIS CERTIFICATE TODAY!" The certificate itself clearly required that Joshua
purchase a subscription to Fortune magazine in order to receive the free calculator watch. The good news was that Joshua could save up to 66% on the subscription, which might even be tax deductible. Even more important to the bargain hunter, prices may never be this low again. The bad news was that Time obviously had no intention of giving Joshua the versatile new calculator watch just for opening the envelope. Joshua's parents sued on his behalf for, among other things, damages equal to the value of the watch and $15,000,000 in punitive damages. Did Time, Inc. act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine? Did Joshua's
parents act ethically in filing the lawsuit against Time, Inc.? How would you decide this case?
Time, Inc. did not act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine by using deceptive practices such as making an offer in the mail, which seemed to be free, but was in reality, conditioned upon the purchase of a subscription to Fortune magazine.
It used fraudulent means to create a façade of a free offer and lure in subscribers. This violates ethical principles that require transparency in business practices. Joshua's parents acted ethically in filing a lawsuit against Time, Inc. The company's deception not only misrepresented the offer, but it also violated the rights of the recipient. Hence, it was imperative to file a lawsuit in the matter to protect their rights.
The lawsuit was the correct approach to hold the company accountable for its unethical practices. The case would be decided in favor of Joshua's parents, as the company's actions are a clear violation of ethical principles. The court may award compensation to Joshua for the value of the watch and may impose punitive damages on Time, Inc. to deter the company from using such fraudulent methods to obtain subscriptions.
To know more about lawsuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31360444
#SPJ11
Question 16
2 pts
erma enters into a contract to buy a tract of lakefront property from forest acres to build and sell a
residential development. forest acres fails to close the sale. erma's remedy is most likely
the amount that erma invested in the project to the date of the closing.
o nothing-forest acres still owns the land.
o the difference between the contract and market prices of the land.
specific performance.
question 17
2 pts
The "Contract Price" refers to the specific price that a given buyer and seller have decided upon to sell a particular house. The Appraised Value is a certified assessment of what the market as a whole could be willing to pay for a house.
Can the price on a contract be changed?Typically, neither you nor the vendor has the authority to unilaterally alter the conditions. However, some agreements are made with the option for price adjustments in case project size and scope change in the future.
What drives market pricing?The combination between supply and demand determines market pricing. The balance between supply and demand determines an equilibrium price.
To know more about Contract Price visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14450413
#SPJ4
legally acceptable ID has which characteristic?
(b) Characteristics of a legally acceptable ID: (1) Issued by a government agency; (2) Contains the name, date of birth, photograph, and physical description of the ID holder; and (3) A valid expiration date.
The legally acceptable ID has characteristics as issued by a government agency.
For official purposes, the most trustworthy and commonly recognized kind of identification is one that has been issued by the government. When confirming a person's identification, these IDs often carry a lot of weight and trust.
Government-issued identification documents sometimes have security holograms, one-of-a-kind serial numbers, official seals or emblems, and other components that make them challenging to copy or fabricate.
Learn more about identification, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29637546
#SPJ6
LAW:
What does the Bad Frog case stand for? Do you agree with any of the
courts' decisions? How would you have ruled and why if you were the
judge in this case?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.
What is the meaning of the phrase separation of church and state ?.
Separation of Church and State means: Neither church nor state will interfere in the matters of each other.
The American secular movement holds that religious freedom cannot exist without a secular state. It supports liberal stances on social issues including LGBT rights, reproductive freedom, and the separation of religion and state, and is generally opposed to religious extremism, particularly that of the Christian right. A state must be completely secular in order to be considered a true example of a secular state. The state and religious organizations ought to be kept apart. The state shouldn't support religious organizations in any way. Any particular religion cannot be imposed by the state on anyone.
The goal of secularism is to establish a framework that upholds everyone's legal rights. Different perspectives on religious privilege, tolerance, and prejudice are essential to many urgent societal concerns.
Learn more about Securalism here: https://brainly.com/question/2135879
#SPJ4
the role of the national mediation board in a labor dispute such as that between owners and managers in the national hockey league is to provide when they are requested.
The role of the National Mediation Board (NMB) in a labor dispute, such as that between owners and managers in the National Hockey League, is to provide assistance when requested.
The National Mediation Board (NMB) is an independent U.S. government agency that facilitates labor-management relations in the railroad and airline sectors. It was established in 1934 as an autonomous agency to mediate labor disputes in these sectors and to oversee collective bargaining, with the goal of promoting stability in the transportation industry.In a labor dispute like the one between owners and managers in the National Hockey League, the role of the National Mediation Board is to offer mediation assistance when requested.
The Board's mission is to promote a stable and peaceful labor-management relationship, and it assists both parties in reaching a mutual agreement on their own terms.The National Mediation Board may facilitate the dispute resolution process by offering guidance, expertise, and various forms of mediation and other alternative dispute resolution techniques. It may also play a significant role in bringing both parties together for constructive talks and negotiations that result in a settlement.
Learn more about national mediation here:https://brainly.com/question/31163960
#SPJ11
Write a brief summary (one paragraph each of 3-5 sentences) of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Vernonia v. Acton cases.
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Answer:doing the same homework and struggling but here’s number 1
Explanation:
:)
Which statement explains the way historical events affected the development of values in American society?
American society is made up of people who can look back on events in U.S. history.
American national history covers many subjects, including the topic of American society.
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
The experience that comes from reading history has been valuable to many people in America.
Answer:
The experience of events in U.S. history has shaped people’s values, which have shaped U.S. society.
According to the supremacy clause, what three items are the supreme law of the land?
According to the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution, there are three items that are considered the supreme law of the land.
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties are the supreme law of the land and that state laws and constitutions must comply with these federal laws.
The first item that is considered the supreme law of the land is the Constitution itself. The Constitution is the foundational document of the United States, and it sets out the basic structure and principles of the federal government. The second item that is considered the supreme law of the land is federal law.
These laws are enacted by Congress and signed into law by the President. They cover a wide range of topics, from criminal law to environmental law to healthcare. Federal laws apply to everyone in the United States, regardless of which state they live in. The third item that is considered the supreme law of the land is treaties. Treaties are agreements between the United States and other nations. They cover a variety of topics, from trade to defense to human rights. Treaties are negotiated by the President and must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate.
To know more about Supremacy Clause
https://brainly.com/question/1481445
#SPJ11
Which type of court system functions to determine the liability of the defendant? Limited jurisdiction court systems Supreme court systems Criminal court systems Civil court systems
Answer:
Civil court systems
Explanation:
Civil courts are institutions set up by the government to settle disputes between individuals, companies, government institutions, and so on.
Their primary role is to determine the liability of the defendant who is the source of injury to the plaintiff in the given case.
The injury may not be physical.
Typically the sentence issued in a civil court is aimed at compensating the plaintiff for injury recieved and damages.
On the other hand criminal courts give sentences of incarceration.
Answer:
Civil court systems
Explanation:
The Learned Hand risk calculus formula is:
The Learned Hand risk calculus formula is a legal concept that aims to determine the level of reasonable care that a person or entity should exercise in a given situation.
It is named after Judge Learned Hand who first proposed the formula in the United States v. Carroll Towing Co. case in 1947.
The formula takes into account three factors: the probability of harm occurring, the gravity of the harm if it does occur, and the cost or burden of taking precautions to prevent the harm.
If the burden of taking precautions is less than the product of the probability of harm and the gravity of harm, then the party responsible for taking precautions has failed to exercise reasonable care.
The Learned Hand risk calculus formula is commonly used in negligence cases to determine whether a defendant's conduct fell below the standard of care expected of them.
To know more about calculus formula refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31422032#
#SPJ11
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
A convicted sex offender
Men convicted of crimes of passion have ____brain levels
of serotonin than those convicted of premeditated murder.
Answer:
low
Explanation:
1. How can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims? (200 words, 5 marks)
The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).
How should the principles of Ubuntu be applied to the criminal justice system to assist victims in receiving justice?In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.
When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.
Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.
Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.
When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.
Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369
#SPJ9
The elements of child abduction (PC 207e) are: (1) taking a child (2) intent to detain the child and (3) ______ from its parents, guardian, public agency, etc. The child’s _________has no effect on this section.
Answer:
1. ³/⁵-¹⁹⅘fright 5&23⁹/⁶
What is the minimum age for anyone to be on the premises of a class ag (bar) permit at any time?
The minimum age for anyone to be on the premises of a Class A or Class G (bar) permit at any time is 21 years.
In many countries, the legal drinking age is 21, and this age restriction applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, commonly referred to as bars.
The legal drinking age varies by country, and in some cases, even within different regions of a country. However, for the purpose of this explanation, I will provide information based on the legal drinking age in the United States, as it is one of the most well-known examples.
In the United States, the legal drinking age is 21 years old. This means that individuals must be at least 21 years old to purchase, possess, or consume alcoholic beverages. Additionally, this age restriction also applies to entering the premises of establishments with Class A or Class G permits, which are typically bars or establishments where alcohol is served.
Class A permits are typically issued to establishments that primarily serve alcoholic beverages, while Class G permits are issued to businesses that serve alcohol, but it is not their primary focus. Regardless of the class of the permit, the minimum age requirement remains the same.
It is important to note that the legal drinking age and age restrictions for entering bars or establishments serving alcohol may vary in different countries or regions. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult the specific laws and regulations of the particular jurisdiction in question to obtain accurate and up-to-date information on age restrictions for entering bar premises.
To learn more about permit click here: brainly.com/question/32091205
#SPJ11
Discuss your thoughts on a police officer' discretion on risking his/her own life along with the life of a suspect so justice can be served.
Personally, i believed that a police officer' discretion on risking his/her own life along with the life of a suspect so justice can be served is a decision at the hand of such officer.
What is a police officer' discretion?A police discretion refers to one of which is a power or authority granted by law or by the power of law to act based on one's own judgment or belief which action is more moral than law.
The understanding of the police discretion is that it is a policy of the police to make an immediate decision without necessarily waiting for superior order to act.
The discretion of a police officer is an important part of their ability to do their job as they must often make quick and make an in-the-moment decisions that cannot wait for specific laws to be consulted or review.
Read more about police discretion
brainly.com/question/1129992
#SPJ1
An attorney has a case in Iowa that has a legal issue to be decided. The attorney brings in a case from the neighboring state of Nebraska that was decided by the Nebraska Supreme Court. The judge in the state of Iowa is not REQUIRED to follow that Nebraska case, but can consider it. The case law is referred to as ___________________________________ authority since the Iowa judge may, but does not have to decide the same way as Nebraska.
Answer: Persuasive authority
Explanation:
Persuasive authority is a decision that a court may follow but does not have to. The decision may be from courts with lower, equal, or higher standing with the court it is brought to but from another jurisdiction.
The case in question here will be dealt with according to Iowa state law so bringing a decision by the Nebraska Supreme Court is from another jurisdiction. The Iowa judge can either choose to follow the precedent set by Nebraska or not at their own discretion.
Each court has a jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is best defined asa. a doctrine that follows established precedents.b. the geographic area in which a court has the power to apply the law.c. a judicial proceeding to redress a wrong.d. a situation giving a person a right to initiate a judicial proceeding.
The correct option is B ; The geographic area in which a court has the power to apply the law .
The word "jurisdiction" refers to the legal power granted to a court to try cases and decide on legal matters involving specific sorts of legal claims and/or within a specific geographic region. Power separation. The term "Separation of Powers" was created by 18th century philosopher Montesquieu.
Separation of powers is a paradigm that splits the government into several parts, each with its own set of authorities. Hamilton made his second significant point. To defend such rights, he declared, the court must be granted the authority of JUDICIAL REVIEW to declare unconstitutional laws null and invalid.
Learn more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
which of following are examples of the executive branch's power to impact the legislative branch and the laws it passes? (select all that apply.) multiple select question. the president has the power to veto any law passed by congress. the president can propose bills to congress. the regulatory agencies have responsibility for enforcing laws. the regulatory agencies can make new laws.
Out of the given examples, the correct statements that describe the executive branch's power to impact the legislative branch and the laws it passes are,
The president can propose bills to congress;The president has the power to veto any law passed by congress;the regulatory agencies have responsibility for enforcing laws.Therefore, the options A, B, and C hold true.
The branches of government are designated to perform specific functions only. Moreover, these powers may have overriding effects, especially when it comes to the powers of the Executive Branch of the government over the Legislative Branch of the government. Some of these powers held by the different branches of the government in the United States have already been mentioned above.
Learn more about branches of government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16327953
#SPJ4
The Art Forger Who Tricked the Nazis
Where did the trial take place? What was the defendant accused of?
What was strange about his defense?
How did Han van Meegeren manage to forge the works of art so well? What did he do to make them look authentic?
How could forensic testing have changed this case?
What ultimately happened to van Meegeren?
Money to Run, But No Skills to Hide
How did Schrenker try to fake his own death? How did he get caught?
Why is creating a new state ID harder to do these days?
Why is it so difficult to fake a passport? What is the easiest way for criminals to obtain a passport?
Why does Mr. Abagnale claim it is easy to get a fraudulent passport? What steps does someone have to take to make this happen?
Why was Mr. Abagnale arrested? What happened to him after his arrest?
How the Supreme Court has balanced the values of order and freedom in the
area of pure and symbolic speech
Complete the statement with the correct options.
The ____ unit analyzes body fluids, such as ____ to identify victims and suspects.
A: Ballistics
B: Photography
C: Biology
-------------------
A: Hair
B: Teeth
C: Blood
Answer:
biology, blood.
Explanation:
ballistics deals with 2A, so not that one. and crime scene photography does not analyze evidence filmed. but bio does to test for who's dna etc. you can use hair teeth and blood to identify a victim or suspect but with the given example of bodily fluids blood is the best answer. hope this helps.
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Which crime is growing at such a significant rate that retailers should expect about a 10–15 percent annual increase of occurrences?
burglary
embezzlement
robbery
shoplifting
Answer:
I think robbery because of population growth.
what similarities and differences do you find among grotius, wilson, and posner? which argument do you find most compelling and why? what are the strengths and weaknesses of international law and organizations? are they effective at promoting peace and cooperation?
Hugo grotius : Known as the father of international law. He developed the rules governing the conduct of war
Posner : According to Posner, states will not reliably comply with customary international law.
Wilson : He sought to take international law out of the hands of states and give it to the true sovereign.
Strengths of international law are
They promote unity and strength.Settle various disputesDiscuss important world ordersMaintain a global system including trade, commerce and governance.Weakness of international law are
Lacks effective law machinery
The International Court of Justice has no authority.Weak sanction and efficiency.They help in promoting peace and stability but due to certain issues it gets into backend. With proper control it can definitely be improved.
To know more about International law from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1449228
#SPJ4
Which of the following is true of an Authoritarian government?
Answer:
you need to put the options
Explanation:
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points
Which law passed under the articles of confederation allowed for the creation of new states and the expansion of the u. S. ?.
Answer: Northwest Ordinance of 1787
Explanation: