both the yanomamo and the lakota have dealt with violence within their tribes, or violence put upon their tribes. how has the violence that each tribe has experienced differed?
Answers
Both the Yanomamo and Lakota tribes have faced violence within and against their communities, but the nature and causes of the violence differ. The Yanomamo have a long history of inter-tribal warfare, often fought over resources such as land or women.
Violence is seen as a means of proving masculinity and establishing dominance, and the use of weapons such as bows and arrows is common. In contrast, the Lakota experienced violence through colonization and forced displacement by European settlers, resulting in battles such as the Battle of Little Bighorn.
The violence was rooted in the desire for land and resources by the settlers, and the Lakota were fighting to protect their way of life and sovereignty. The use of firearms was prevalent in these conflicts. Overall, while both tribes have experienced violence, the causes and methods of violence differ greatly, reflecting the unique histories and contexts of each community.
You can learn more about violence at: brainly.com/question/31635337
#SPJ11
Related Questions
what are the contributing factors that lead to Gender Based Violence
Answers
Answer:
pulleys by d7eiebstienwgss
Answer:
Harmful:Gender Norms.Gender stereotypes and are often used to justify violence against women.
Hunger:Just as empowering women can help eliminate hunger,food scarcity also leads to increase gender-based violence.
War and conflict.
Explanation:
I hope this answers will help u
How were the Mauryan and Gupta Empires different?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Mauryan empire was the first kingdom to be established among the two kingdoms. It was founded by Mauryan Chandragupta in 325 BCE and it existed until around 185 BCE. Gupta empire on the other hand came into existence much later on. It was established by Sri Chandragupta in 320 CE snd existed through to the 4th and 5th centuries.
2. Mauryan dynasty was larger in size compared to Gupta dynasty. Mauryan dynasty included almost all of the entire India, Pakistan and also Afghanistan. Gupta dynas-ty however only covered some portions of India.
I hope those two were helpful ∵
Which of the following best completes the list
Answers
Which of the following influenced the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the citizen and the U.S. Declaration of Independence?
A. U.S. Constitution
B. Declaration of Independence
C. Magna Carta
D. English Bill of Rights
Answers
earth is a common home to all ( explain )
Answers
Answer:
Earth is regarded as home to all due to its favorable environment
Explanation:
Earth compared to the environment and atmosphere of other planets is regarded as the safest place to be in the universe ignoring all the several crisis and so on. Earth is neither regarded as too cold nor too hot for life to coexist in it, it was created perfectly for existence and procreation and contains not just we humans plants and animals but it has been discovered to home even creatures beyond our understanding.
Hope this helped
Brainliest please
In the classical period, serious composition was flavored by what sources?
Answers
During the classical period, the serious compositions were flavored by folk and popular sources of music. Therefore, the option B holds true.
The serious composition was a popular form of musical representation that emerged in the society during the classical period. Mythology was replaced by modern and woke thoughts, however, culture remained an important part of these compositions. As a result, these compositions, serious in nature, were flavored by folk and popular music during the classical period.
Learn more about serious composition here:
https://brainly.com/question/3226839
#SPJ4
Complete question
In the classical period, serious composition was flavored by what sources?
A. heroic and mythological plots
B. folk and popular music
C. elaborately ornamented improvisational plots
D. All of the above
Why did the Supreme Court find the prior restraint unconstitutional? Include the arguments of the majority decision and the dissenting opinion (those who disagree).
Answers
The Supreme Court found prior restraint unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment protection of free speech and press.
Majority decision: The Supreme Court ruled that prior restraint, which is the government's censorship or prohibition of speech before it is published, is generally unconstitutional.
The majority argued that the First Amendment's protection of free speech and press requires a heavy presumption against prior restraints, as they pose a significant threat to free expression and the flow of information.
Dissenting opinion: The dissenting justices may disagree with the majority decision, arguing that prior restraint can be constitutional under certain circumstances.
They might contend that there are exceptional cases where national security, public safety, or other compelling interests may warrant temporary prior restraints to prevent harm or preserve order.
In summary, the Supreme Court found prior restraint unconstitutional because it infringes upon the First Amendment rights of free speech and press. The majority decision emphasized the strong presumption against prior restraints, while the dissenting opinion may argue for limited exceptions based on compelling government interests.
Know more about the First Amendment rights click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30962980
#SPJ11
twelve-year-old caleb demonstrates a strongly masculine sense of self-identity, even though his father left when he was only 2 years old and he was raised without a father figure. this fact represents the most serious threat to theory of personality.
Answers
The fact that twelve-year-old Caleb demonstrates a strongly masculine sense of self-identity, despite being raised without a father figure, poses a serious threat to the theory of personality.
This is because traditional theories of personality development emphasize the importance of parental figures, particularly fathers, in shaping a child's gender identity and sense of self.
Traditional theories of personality development, such as Freud's psychoanalytic theory and Erikson's psychosocial theory, posit that children go through various stages of development that are influenced by their relationships with significant others, particularly their parents. For example, Freud argued that during the phallic stage (ages 3-6), children develop a strong identification with their same-sex parent, which forms the basis of their gender identity. Similarly, Erikson argued that during the initiative vs. guilt stage (ages 3-6), children develop a sense of self-efficacy and autonomy through positive interactions with their parents.
Given these theories, the fact that Caleb developed a strong sense of masculinity despite being raised without a father figure challenges the idea that parental figures are essential to personality development. It suggests that other factors, such as socialization by peers or exposure to media, may also play a role in shaping a child's sense of self. This highlights the need for a more nuanced and comprehensive theory of personality development that takes into account a range of factors, rather than relying solely on the influence of parental figures.
Learn more about personality development: https://brainly.com/question/1452486
#SPJ11
Which native american group lives in present day florida
Answers
Answer:
The Seminole and Miccosukee tribes
Explanation:
Choose the best answer according to the following scenario: an evil person has abducted a family member of your family along with five strangers and has tied all six people to a train track that forms a loop where there is an oncoming train approaching quickly. (your family member is tied on the north side of the loop and the five strangers are tied on the south side of the loop. {note--there is train depot opposite of where you are standing on the other side of the looping train track so the train will not do a full circle and kill all six people.}. so the train will either inevitably kill your one family member or the five strangers. now the train is initially slotted to head towards your family member on the north side. you are thus standing at the juncture of the loop by the switch lever where you get to decide where the train will go, north or south side of the loop, before it stops at the depot. according to the virtue of loyalty, what would a loyal virtuous person do?
a. don't switch the direction of the train thus killing your family member.
b. switch the direction of the train thus killing your family member.
c. switch the direction of the train thus killing the five strangers.
d. don't switch the direction of the train thus killing the five strangers.
Answers
When faced with this kind of scenario that involves an evil person, what a loyal virtuous person is going to do is to switch the direction of the train thus killing your family member.
Who is a loyal virtuous person?
This is a type of virtue that is very symbolic of central duties. This is a person who is moral and acts as he is expected to in given situations.
In the question, the feeling of having a family member in harms way may cause some people to let the strangers die.
But the number of strangers compared to the family member is 5:1 so, morally it would be better to have 1 person die and 5 others live.
Read more on loyalty here: https://brainly.com/question/10286547
identify whether or not the following are examples of marital homogamy. marital homogamy drag appropriate answer(s) here two couples living together in one house as one family. press space to open a harvard graduate marrying another harvard graduate. press space to open a black woman marrying a white man. press space to open a young man from a working-class background marrying a young woman from a working-class background.
Answers
Two couples living together in one house as one family is not necessarily an example of marital homogamy as it could involve individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds, religions, cultures, etc.
A Harvard graduate marrying another Harvard graduate is an example of marital homogamy as both individuals share similar educational backgrounds.
A black woman marrying a white man is not an example of marital homogamy as it involves individuals from different racial backgrounds.
A young man from a working-class background marrying a young woman from a working-class background is an example of marital homogamy as both individuals share similar socioeconomic backgrounds.
Learn more about marital homogamy:
https://brainly.com/question/31449512
#SPJ11
He is known for his practice of total war.
Robert E Lee
William Tecumseh Sherman
Ulysses S.Grant
Answers
Answer:
The answer is William Tecumseh Sherman Hope this Helps!
Prepare a list of universal behaviors that guide your behavior
under all circumstances. What core principles do you rarely
violate? Think about what has influenced these principles. I have
to answer t
Answers
Universal behaviors tend to be associated with values and ethical principles that are upheld in the society. A list of universal behaviors that guide our behavior under all circumstances includes:
Treating others with respect and dignity Being honest and truthful in all dealings with others Taking responsibility for one's actions and accepting consequences Listening attentively and being open-minded Empathizing with others and showing compassion Acting with integrity and adhering to moral principles Assuming responsibility for personal growth and development Avoiding violence and seeking peaceful solutions to conflicts Sharing and helping others when possible While certain circumstances may change the way one behaves or reacts, universal behaviors remain consistent.
This is because universal behaviors are guided by core principles that are deeply ingrained in the individual and are not likely to be compromised. The core principles that are rarely violated are influenced by various factors including upbringing, cultural background, religion, personal values and beliefs, and life experiences. They are typically formed through a combination of personal experiences and observations of others.
Read more about Empathizing here:https://brainly.com/question/20047598
#SPJ11
will give brainliest
Answers
Answer:
I think it either B or C most probably B
Describe the stages civilizations go through.
Answers
Answer: civilizations tend to emerge, grow, decline, and fall in a specific and observable sequence of stages: Mixture. Gestation. Expansion.
Explanation: hope this helps! sorry if it’s wrong :(
how was the population of states divided in mesopotamia
Answers
Answer:
dnndjduswiuwiwiqjqkiwwwe
Answer:
The Mesopotamian civilization developed between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. Mesopotamia was historically divided into two regions inhabited by two different peoples: The Assyrians who lived in northern Mesopotamia or Assyria and the Akkadians and Sumerians who lived in southern Mesopotamia or Akkad
Explanation: pls mark my answer as brainlist
mary and bob are both drinking alcohol. knowing that alcohol affects men and women differently, which statement is accurate?
Answers
Bob and Mary are both drinking. Mary will become intoxicated more quickly than Bob will because men and women react to alcohol differently.
Which of the following is a brief result of drinking alcohol?Alcohol consumption can have short-term impacts such as hangovers, alcohol poisoning, falls and accidents, conflict, decreased inhibitions, and dangerous behaviors.
What impact do the variables that influence how each person reacts to alcohol have?How a person reacts to alcohol is influenced by their genetic make-up, body mass index, gender, age, choice of beverage, amount of food in their stomach, drugs they are taking, and level of health.
To know more about drinking alcohol visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28467917
#SPJ1
When you explain, teach, describe, or provide your audience with a greater understanding of your topic, your general purpose is to ____________________.
Answers
Answer:
educate them..........
The __________ Revolution occurred in __________ after the ayatollah overthrew the existing government in 1979.
A.
Buddhist . . . India
B.
Islamic . . . Iran
C.
Catholic . . . Spain
D.
American . . . the United States
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answers
Answer: B
Explanation: The answer couldn’t be America or Spain for obvious reasons. Leaving A and B open. However, C makes since with the time frame (1979)
Which of the following forecasting methods puts the least weight on the most recent time series value?a. exponential smoothing with α = .3 b. exponential smoothing with α = .2 c. moving average using the most recent 4 periods d. moving average using the most recent 3 periods
Answers
Moving average methods put equal weight on the most recent time series values, whereas exponential smoothing methods put more weight on the more recent values.
Therefore, the answer to this question would be either (c) moving average using the most recent 4 periods or (d) moving average using the most recent 3 periods. These methods put the least weight on the most recent time series value as they average over a longer period of time.
Exponential smoothing methods, on the other hand, give more weight to the most recent value, making them more sensitive to recent changes in the data. In terms of which method puts less weight on the most recent time series value between (c) and (d), it would depend on the specific data and the trend being observed. Answering this question requires an understanding of forecasting methods and how they work in different scenarios. Answer more than 100 words.
To know more about exponential visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28640407
#SPJ11
Give an example of a third party. What are its viewpoints?
Answers
Answer:
In electoral politics, a third party is any party contending for votes that failed to outpoll either of its two strongest rivals (or, in the context of an impending election, is considered highly unlikely to do so). The distinction is particularly significant in two-party systems. In any case "third" is often used figuratively, as in "the third parties", where the intent, literally stated, is "the third and succeeding parties".
For instance, in the United Kingdom a third party is a national political party, other than the Conservatives and Labour, which has at least one member in the House of Commons. From 1922 to 2015, Liberal Democrats and its predecessor Liberals was the third party. Since 2015, it is used for the Scottish National Party (SNP). In Scotland, SNP has been the dominant parliamentary party beginning with the 2011 Scottish Parliament election, with the Conservative the next largest party and Labour becoming Scotland's third party ever since.
In the United States of America, there have been numerous "third parties". The largest since the mid-20th century are the Libertarian and Green Parties.
In Canada provinces such as Ontario, Prince Edward Island and Quebec, nearly 50+ active political parties exist throughout the nation with several of them both provincial and federal levels either elected, formed or joined during cross-flooring.
The term "third parties" is used mostly in countries with first-past-the-post voting systems, as those systems tend to create a two-party system, so that successful smaller parties are rare to stronger two-party systems like the United States.
Countries using proportional representation give little advantage to the largest two parties, so they tend to elect many parties. Therefore, in those countries, three, four, or more political parties are usually elected to legislatures. In such parliamentary systems, coalitions often include smaller parties; since they may participate in a coalition government, there is not a sharp distinction with a 'major' party. In two-party systems, on the other hand, only the major parties have a serious chance of forming a government. Similarly, in presidential systems, third-party candidates are rarely elected president.
In some categorizations, a party needs to have a certain level of success to be considered a third party. Smaller parties that win only a very small share of the vote and no seats in the legislature often are termed minor or fringe parties.
When ancient people settled a region many things influenced where they decided to live and make their home. The Response area of
Answers
When ancient people settled a region, many factors influenced where they decided to live and make their home. Some of these factors included the availability of resources such as water, fertile land for agriculture, and timber for building materials.
Who are the ancient people?Generally, When early people opted to colonize a place, they were affected by a variety of circumstances in choosing where to reside and build their homes.
The availability of resources like as water, fertile land for agriculture, and wood for construction materials was one of these considerations. Other reasons included the elements listed above. People have a tendency to live in locations where the climate is conducive to their way of life, therefore this was an additional aspect that played a significant role in the decision-making process.
The presence of natural defenses, such as mountains or rivers, which could provide protection against enemies, and the availability of trade routes, which could facilitate the exchange of goods and ideas, are two other factors that may have played a role in determining where ancient people settled. Natural defenses could have included mountains or rivers.
Read more about ancient people
https://brainly.com/question/17154113
#SPJ1
CQ not found
According to the results presented by the experiment, the relationship between the lift force and the vesicle radius would best be described as:
Answers
Answer: Exponential
Explanation: Examining and studying both the second and third columns in Table 1, it's clearly shown that as the radius increases, so does the lift force, eliminating choice B. Having chosen the first two vesicles, the estimated slope, or "rise over run," is calculated to be (4.7 - 0.2) / (20.5 - 8.7) ~ 4.5/12 ~ 0.4. If we instead use the last two vesicles, we obtain a value of (153.6 - 87.1) / (67 - 50.9) ~ 66.5/16 ~ 4. Therefore, the slope keeps increasing at a rate perceived to be ever-higher, which can be affirmed by inspecting other combinations of data for the vesicles. On this wise it can be concluded that the relationship is exponential.
Income tax evasion, embezzlement, and bribery are examples of __________. Group of answer choices White-collar crime Victimless crime Social stigma Formal social control
Answers
Answer:
White Collar Crimes
Explanation:
White-collar crimes refers to financially motivated, nonviolent or non directly violent crime committed by individuals, businesses and government professionals.
1. What type of surface do sound waves reflect off of?
1.Soft
2.Hard
Answers
Answer:
Hard Surfaces
Explanation:
Soft surfaces will absorb sound while hard surfaces will reflect it.
shelly fully expected to win her debate tournament, but she lost. she then spent many hours reviewing the debate to figure out why the outcome occurred. shelly is engaged in
Answers
Based on the given scenario shelly is engaging in what is called attribution.
Attribution occur when a person begin to rethink about a certain outcomes of the event that happened to them so as to know the reason why the outcome was so.
A person with attribution personality will often tend to always identify and review the reason why something happen or what led to the situation or challenges they are currently facing.
Based on the given scenario shelly is engaging in attribution based on the fact that she was reviewing the outcomes of the result of the tournament or what resulted in her not winning the game so as to know the cause.
Inconclusion shelly is engaging in what is called attribution.
Learn more about attribution here:https://brainly.com/question/6654060
help fast
Which of the following were instrumental in General Grant's plan for ending the Civil
War? Select all that apply.
Ousing generals who would obey without question
Dengaging financial help from European allies
Odestroying anything in the South that would help the Confederacy
Oopening negotiations for a peaceable Confederate surrender
(10 points)
Answers
Answer:
Using generals who would obey without question
Destroying anything in the South that would help the Confederacy
Using generals who would obey without question and Destroying anything in the South that would help the Confederacy were instrumental in General Grant's plan for ending the Civil War.
What was Civil War?A civil war in the United States, the American Civil War. The Union and the Confederate, the latter of which was made up of seceding states, engaged in combat.
The conflict over whether to allow slavery to spread into the western regions, creating more slave states, or to forbid it from doing so, which was widely believed to put slavery on the path to eventual extinction, was the main driver of the war.
The election of Abraham Lincoln as president of the United States in 1860 ended years of political contention over slavery because he opposed its spread into the country's western territories.
Following Lincoln's triumph, the Confederacy was formed when the first seven southern slave states seceded from the United States.
Learn more about Civil War, here
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ2
What was Harriet Tubmans greatest aceivemant
Answers
Answer: Civil War spy
Explanation:
Harriet Tubman's most important achievement was being a Civil War spy. Harriet Tubman helped many people as a spy, without her work helping slaves, it would have been very hard
Jamarcus works part-time as a pizza delivery person in a college town. The bureau of labor statistics counts jamarcus as.
Answers
Jamarcus works part-time as a pizza delivery person in a college town. The bureau of labor statistics counts Jamarcus as employed and in the labor force.
All employees are a part of the hard work pressure, but the labor pressure additionally includes human beings on unemployment who are looking for work, as well as the employers who provide personnel with repayment. Despite the fact that a task seeker might be taken into consideration as part of the labor pressure, she would not qualify as a worker.
The labor force participation charges are calculated because the labor force is divided by the total operating-age populace. The running age population refers to humans aged 15 to sixty-four. This indicator is damaged by age institution and it is measured as a percent of every age institution.
People who are neither working nor searching out work are counted as “no longer within the labor force,” consistent with the U.S. Bureau of labor information. In view that 2000, the percentage of human beings in this institution has accelerated.
Learn more about the labor force here https://brainly.com/question/24939447
#SPJ4
assume that mpc for an economy is 0.5. if the government decreased personal income taxes and expenditures by the same amount, then
Answers
So, the equilibrium level of income and output will decrease by twice the amount of the combined decrease in personal income taxes and government expenditure.
Here MPC = 0.5, if the government decreased personal income taxes and expenditures by the same amount, then the economy will experience a change in the equilibrium level of income and output.The equilibrium level of income and output will increase by a multiple of the change in autonomous expenditure.
This can be expressed as:ΔY = ΔA * [1/(1 - MPC)]
Where,ΔY is the change in equilibrium level of income and output.ΔA is the change in autonomous expenditure.
MPC is the Marginal Propensity to Consume.
When the government decreases personal income taxes and expenditures by the same amount, autonomous expenditure falls by the same amount, i.e.,
ΔA = - ΔT - ΔG
Where,ΔT is the change in personal income taxes.ΔG is the change in government expenditure.
Substituting this value of ΔA in the above equation, we get:ΔY = (-ΔT - ΔG) * [1/(1 - 0.5)]
ΔY = (-ΔT - ΔG) * 2ΔY = -2ΔT - 2ΔG.
Learn more about income visit: brainly.com/question/30157678
#SPJ11