The ratio of the measures of the three sides of a triangle is 9: 7: 5 . Its perimeter is 191.1 inches. Find the measure of each side.

The DTKF equations for the given linear dynamic system are not the same as in the Gallager problem.

The DTKF (Discrete-Time Kalman Filter) equations are used for estimating the state of a dynamic system based on observed measurements. In the given system, the state equation is In = Xn-1, and the observation equation is Yn = X + 20n.

The DTKF equations consist of two main steps: the prediction step and the update step. In the prediction step, the estimated state and its covariance are predicted based on the previous state estimate and the system dynamics. In the update step, the predicted state estimate is adjusted based on the new measurement and its covariance.

For the given system, the DTKF equations can be derived as follows:

Prediction Step:

Update Step:

These DTKF equations are specific to the given linear dynamic system and differ from those in the Gallager problem, as they depend on the system dynamics, observation model, and noise characteristics.

The DTKF equations for the given linear dynamic system are not the same as in the Gallager problem. Each dynamic system has its own unique set of equations based on its specific characteristics, and the DTKF equations are tailored to estimate the state of the system accurately.

To know more about linear dynamic system visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30408733

#SPJ11

The probabilities of individual outcomes are numbers between 0 and 1, and they must sum to exactly 1. So the correct option is D.

A legitimate probability model must satisfy certain conditions to be considered valid. One of the most important conditions is that the probabilities assigned to individual outcomes must be between 0 and 1, inclusive.

This means that the probability of any outcome cannot be negative or greater than 1. Additionally, the sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes must be exactly 1. This condition ensures that the model provides a complete and exhaustive set of possible outcomes. Finally, probabilities can never be equal to 0 because this would mean that the outcome is impossible, and probabilities cannot be negative because they represent the likelihood of an event occurring. These conditions ensure that the probability model is a valid representation of the random process being studied.

Learn more about  individual outcomes

https://brainly.com/question/30260530

#SPJ4

Full Question ;

Which of the following is true of any legitimate probability model? A. Probabilities can be positive or negative. B. The probabilities of individual outcomes are numbers between 0 and 1, and they must sum to no more than 1. C. The probabilities of individual outcomes are numbers between 0 and 1, and they must sum to at least 1. D. The probabilities of individual outcomes are numbers between 0 and 1, and they must sum to exactly 1. E. It's impossible for a probability to ever equal O.

Answer:y=3x-4

Step-by-step explanation:

you add 5 on both sides

simplify

and get y on one side

slope is 3

the y intercept is -4

Answer:

23 times. Last second of every hour.

On 24 hours, a digital clock displaying hours, minutes, and seconds all six digits change 23 times simultaneously.

The digits representing the seconds on the clock change for every second.

The minute digits change for each minute that is for every 60 seconds.

Similarly, the digits representing the hours on the clock change every 60 minutes.

This means that for all the six digits to change simultaneously, the last second must be such that it completes a minute, and the last minute should be such that it completes an hour.

This means that at the end of every hour, all the six digits change.

Which will happen 23 times for a 24 hours clock.

Learn more about digital clock:

https://brainly.com/question/12073969?referrer=searchResults

the answer is 4 2/5, and I don't think others are equivalent to it

Answer:

There is no error, Amad is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Khan Academy Checked.

Amad had done no error. His conclusion is true.

Two triangles are said to be congruent if their sides are equal in length, the angles are of equal measure, and they can be superimposed on each other.

For example,

In the figure given above, Δ ABC and Δ PQR are congruent triangles. This means that the corresponding angles and corresponding sides in both the triangles are equal.

Sides: AB = PQ, BC = QR and AC = PR;

Angles: ∠A = ∠P, ∠B = ∠Q, and ∠C = ∠R.

Therefore, Δ ABC ≅ Δ PQR

The following are the congruence theorems or the triangle congruence criteria that help to prove the congruence of triangles.

As, from the given cases the prediction of congruency of two triangles is correct. There is no error he made.

Hence, Amad had not made any error.

Learn more about congruency here:

https://brainly.com/question/14011665

#SPJ2

The probability that there are no counts in a 30 second interval is 0.284

What is probability ?

Probability refers to potential.This branch of mathematics deals with the occurrence of a random event. The value's range is 0 to 1. Before we can determine the probability that a particular event will occur, we must first know the total number of outcomes.

Given that,

Assume that a Geiger counter records counts using a poisson process, with an average rate of 2 counts per minute.

0.284

P(X < 10 Seconds)  = P(X<1/6 minutes) = F(1/6) = 1-e-2*1/6 = 1-e-1/3 = 0.284

Therefore, the  probability that there will be no counts in a 30-second period is 0.284.

Learn more about poisson process:

brainly.com/question/28085239

#SPJ4

c because it is accuet.

hope it helps

Option C . The reflexive property of congruence is the correct reason that can justify statement 3 . BD≅BD

The reflexive property of congruence states that every side, every angle, every line segment and every shape is congruent to itself.

To prove that ΔABD is congruent to ΔCBD where given that

1.Line segment AB ≅ Line segment CB  (Given)

2. Then we can write AD ≅CD ; Given : D is the mid point of AC

3. line segment BD ≅ Line segment BD , this is true by reflexive property of congruence which states that every line segment or side is congruent to itself.

BD can be considered as side of both the given triangles

Therefore, the reason that can justify statement 3 is option C.

Also, Learn more about the properties of congruence from the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/2039214

#SPJ5

If the calculated chi-square value is significantly larger than the critical value, it indicates a poor fit of the binomial model to the data.

By various factors such as genetics, shared environment, or exposure may violate the assumptions of the binomial distribution.

To evaluate whether the binomial distribution is suitable for predicting the number of people with the disease in a family, we can perform a chi-square test. However, before conducting the test, we need to set up the hypotheses:

Null Hypothesis (H0): The data follows a binomial distribution.

Alternative Hypothesis (HA): The data does not follow a binomial distribution.

Now let's calculate the expected values assuming the data follows a binomial distribution with a success probability of 22% for each individual:

Expected Value = \(0.22^{k}\) × \(0.78^{(n-k)}\) × (nCk)×N

Where:

k is the number of individuals with the disease in a family (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4)

n is the total number of individuals in a family (4 in this case)

(nCk) is the binomial coefficient, representing the number of ways to choose k individuals out of n

N is the total number of families (500 in this case)

We can calculate the expected values for each category:

k=0: (0.22)⁰ ×(0.78)⁴× (4C₀) × 500 = 0.129×0.375×1× 500 = 24.375

k=1: (0.22)¹×(0.78)³ × (4C₁)×500 = 0.22×0.45×4×500 = 99

k=2: (0.22)²× (0.78)² × (4C₂)×500 = 0.0484 ×0.6084 × 6×500 = 346.5

k=3: (0.22)³ × (0.78)¹ ×(4C₃) ×500 = 0.010648×0.78 ×4 * 500 = 662.4

k=4: (0.22)⁴×(0.78)⁰ ×(4C₄)×500 = 0.00242× 1× 1× 500 = 1.21

Now, we can compare the observed frequencies (from the given data) with the expected frequencies using a chi-square test. Let's assume the observed frequencies are as follows:

k=0: 30

k=1: 140

k=2: 260

k=3: 60

k=4: 10

Using the chi-square formula:

Chi-square = Σ [(Observed - Expected)² / Expected]

Calculating the chi-square value:

Chi-square = [(30-24.375)² / 24.375] + [(140-99)² / 99] + [(260-346.5)² / 346.5] + [(60-662.4)² / 662.4] + [(10-1.21)² / 1.21]

The obtained chi-square value can then be compared against the critical value from the chi-square distribution with (5 - 1) = 4 degrees of freedom. If the calculated chi-square value exceeds the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.

However, in this case, we can anticipate that the binomial model will likely be a poor fit for this data. The binomial distribution assumes that each individual's probability of having the disease is independent and fixed, which may not hold true in this scenario. Additionally, the binomial distribution assumes a constant probability of success (22%) across all trials, which may not be valid for each family.

In this context, the data represents a sample of families, and the occurrence of the disease within a family could be influenced by various factors such as genetics, shared environment, or exposure. These factors may violate the assumptions of the binomial distribution.

Learn more about chi-square test here:

https://brainly.com/question/14082240

#SPJ11

The correct option is a) (x + y) (y + z). Given the output function F in sum-of-minterms form as F = (0, 1, 2, 3, 7), we need to determine the corresponding Boolean expression for the output function.

A 3x8 decoder has three input variables (x, y, z) and eight output variables, where each output variable corresponds to a unique combination of input variables. The output variables are typically represented as minterms.

Let's analyze the given output function F = (0, 1, 2, 3, 7). The minterms represent the outputs that are equal to 1. By observing the minterms, we can deduce the corresponding Boolean expression.

From the minterms, we can see that the output is equal to 1 when x = 0, y = 0, z = 0 or x = 0, y = 0, z = 1 or x = 0, y = 1, z = 0 or x = 0, y = 1, z = 1 or x = 1, y = 1, z = 1.

By simplifying the above conditions, we get (x + y) (y + z), which is the Boolean expression corresponding to the given output function F.

In summary, the correct option is a) (x + y) (y + z).

To learn more about function, click here: brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

Reflection at point y = -6 will have coordinates as

preimage      image

Q(0, -9)          Q' (0, -6)

R(4, -9)           R' (4, -6)

S(6, -8)           S' (6, -5)

T(2, -8)           T' (2, -5)

The transformation involve is reflection and this is a type of transformation that produces the mirror image of the preimage

The transformation rule to get the mirror image is (x, y) → (x, y + 3)

The coordinates are applied as follows

Q(0, -9) → (0, -9 + 3) → Q' (0, -6)

R(4, -9) → (4, -9 + 3) → R' (4, 6)

S(6, -8) → (6, -8 + 3) → S' (6, -5)

T(2, -8) → (2, -8 + 3) → T' (2, -5)

Learn more about transformation here:

brainly.com/question/29321312

#SPJ1

Answer: 13.8

Step-by-step explanation: Since they lost 5.3 yards and then 8 1/2 yards, you simply have to add them together.  Rewriting 8 1/2 as 8.5, you can now add 5.3 to 8.5 to get 13.8, which is the answer

The correct statement is that F(x) < 0 over the intervals (-0.7, 0.76) and (2.5, ∞).

Value of subjective concept that refers to the word of important that an individual group of people places on the something it is often associated with principal beliefs and the standard that are accepted by society when you can be seen as a matter of how important something is true person of organization it is often seen as a reflection of funds for view and can help to save decision.

This can be seen by looking at the function's minimum and maximum values and its points of intersection with the x- and y-axes. The minimum value of (1.9, negative 5.7) is to the left of the x-axis, indicating that the function is negative over the interval (-0.7, 0.76). The maximum value of (0, 2) is above the x-axis, indicating that the function is negative over the interval (2.5, ∞).

To know more about value click-
https://brainly.com/question/25184007
#SPJ1

The mass of a 2018 Olympic gold medal in hectograms is 58.6 hg.

First, we need to know the mass of the Olympic gold medal in grams. According to the question, the mass of an Olympic gold medal is 586 grams.

To convert grams to hectograms, we need to divide the mass in grams by 100. This is because there are 100 grams in 1 hectogram.

To do the division, we can use a calculator. Dividing 586 by 100 gives us 5.86.

The answer we get is in hectograms, so we can write it as 5.86 hg. This means that the mass of a 2018 Olympic gold medal is 5.86 hectograms.

To know more about hectograms, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1058206#

#SPJ11

The condition for a portfolio to be self-financing in the Black-Scholes model is that the portfolio's value does not change due to trading (buying or selling) costs or external cash flows. In other words, the portfolio's value remains constant over time, excluding the effects of the underlying assets' price changes.

For the given portfolio, a = -t (units of the stock) and b = S_t (units of the savings account). To determine if this portfolio is self-financing, we need to check if its value remains constant over time. Using Ito's lemma, we can express the value of the portfolio as:

d(Vt) = a_t * d(St) + b_t * d(Ct)

Substituting the values of a and b, we have:

d(Vt) = -t * (2St * dt + 4St * dBt) + S_t * d(t)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

d(Vt) = -2tSt * dt - 4tSt * dBt + S_t * dt

The portfolio is self-financing if d(Vt) = 0. However, in this case, we can see that the terms involving dBt do not cancel out, indicating that the portfolio is not self-financing.

Girsanov's theorem states that under certain conditions, it is possible to transform a Brownian motion under the real-world measure into a Brownian motion under an equivalent martingale measure (EMM). The EMM is a probability measure under which the discounted asset prices are martingales. By applying Girsanov's theorem or alternative techniques, we can derive the expression for St, the stock price, under the EMM. Unfortunately, without further information or specifications, it is not possible to provide the specific expression in this case.

To determine the price Ct of the call option on the stock at time t ≤ 2, with an exercise price K = 1 and expiration date T = 2, additional information or an appropriate result is required. Without specific details, such as the volatility of the stock or the risk-free interest rate, it is not possible to provide an expression for Ct.

To learn more about self-financing: -brainly.com/question/31403509

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

49

Step-by-step explanation:

5×2(5)+1_2

5×10+1_2

50+1_2

51_2

49

Answer:

she would have worked 11 hours because 182 divide by 13 got 14 so 154 divide by 14 you get 11.

The statement 'if you have 23 people in a room, there is a 50% chance that 2 of them have the same birthday' is True.

The Birthday Paradox states that with 23 people in a room, there is a 50% chance that two of them have the same birthday . This may seem counterintuitive, but the math behind it works as follows:
Calculate the probability that everyone has a different birthday.
Subtract that probability from 1 to get the probability that at least two people share a birthday.
There are 365 possible birthdays for the first person.
For the second person to have a different birthday, there are 364 remaining options.

For the third person, 363 remaining options, and so on.
The probability of everyone having different birthdays is calculated as:
(365/365) × (364/365) × (363/365) × ... × (343/365)
1 - (calculated probability) = probability that at least two people share a birthday
Using this calculation, the probability is approximately 50% that two people have the same birthday with 23 people in the room.

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

I did this question the other day, I think it is right, but I'm not 100% sure. Let me know if it is helpful

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: i think its c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10.04 × 8.8 =?, ? = 88.352 :)

Answer:

88.352

Step-by-step explanation:

10.04

x. 8.8

=88.352

To solve the given differential equation xy' = yxe^(6y/x) using the change of variable v = y/x, we can transform the equation into a separable form.

We start by differentiating both sides of the change of variable v = y/x with respect to x to obtain dv/dx = (y'x - y)/x^2. Substituting y = vx into the given differential equation, we have x(dy/dx) = vxe^(6vx/x). Simplifying the equation yields v + x(dv/dx) = vxe^(6v). Rearranging the terms, we have x(dv/dx) = v(xe^(6v) - 1). This equation can be separated into variables by dividing both sides by v(xe^(6v) - 1). We obtain (1/v)dv = (1/x)(xe^(6v) - 1)dx.

Integrating both sides of the equation gives ∫(1/v)dv = ∫(1/x)(xe^(6v) - 1)dx. Integrating the left side yields ln|v| = ∫(1/x)(xe^(6v) - 1)dx. On the right side, we can simplify the integral by distributing and canceling terms, resulting in ln|v| = ∫(e^(6v) - 1)dx. Evaluating the integral, we have ln|v| = xe^(6v) - x + C, where C is the constant of integration.

Finally, we substitute v = y/x back into the equation. We get ln|y/x| = xe^(6(y/x)) - x + C, which can be further simplified as ln|y| - ln|x| = xe^(6(y/x)) - x + C. Rearranging the terms, we arrive at ln|y| = xe^(6(y/x)) - x + C + ln|x|. The final solution is given by ln|y| = xe^(6(y/x)) + ln|x| + C.

Learn more about differential equation here: brainly.com/question/25731911

#SPJ11

The differential equation that models this situation is dx/dt = kx(M - x) (option c).

To determine the differential equation that models the situation, let's analyze the problem statement.

The rate at which a person can memorize a list of M words is proportional to the product of the number of words memorized and the number of words that have not been memorized.

Let's denote the number of words memorized as "a" and the number of words not yet memorized as "M - a" (where M is the total number of words in the list).

The problem states that the rate of memorization is proportional to the product of "a" and "M - a". We can express this mathematically as:

Rate of memorization ∝ a * (M - a)

To convert this proportionality into an equation, we introduce a positive constant k:

Rate of memorization = k * a * (M - a)

The left side of the equation represents the rate of change of the number of words memorized (da/dt), and the right side represents the product of "a" and "M - a" multiplied by the constant k.

Therefore, the differential equation that models this situation is:

da/dt = k * a * (M - a)

Comparing this with the given options, we can see that the correct choice is option C:

dx/dt = k * x * (M - x)

The complete question is:

At any time t > 0 the rate at which a person can memorize a list of M words is proportional to the product of the number of words memorized and the number of words that have not been memorized. If a denotes the number of words memorized at time t, which differential equation models this situation? Assume k is a positive constant.

A. dx/dt = kx

B. dx/dt = kx(x - M)

C. dx/dt = kx(M - x)

D. dx/dt = kt(M - t)

To know more about differential equation:

https://brainly.com/question/32524608

#SPJ4

According to recent data, women make up 34% and 26% of workers in science and technology (STEM) fields in Canada and the United States, respectively. The correct option is A. 34% and 26%.

According to recent data, women make up 34% and 26% of workers in science and technology (STEM) fields in Canada and the United States, respectively. This indicates that women are still underrepresented in STEM fields, despite the fact that there has been an effort to attract more women to STEM fields.

In both Canada and the United States, women have made significant progress in breaking down gender barriers in STEM fields. However, there is still work to be done to close the gender gap and increase representation of women in STEM fields.

Women's representation in STEM fields has increased in both Canada and the United States in recent years, but the percentage of women in STEM fields is still significantly lower than the percentage of men. More efforts are needed to close the gender gap in STEM fields and encourage more women to pursue STEM careers.

To know more about percentage  :

brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ11