Which of these is NOT considered one of the "Four Great Inventions" of China?
A) Paper
B) Printing
C) Gunpowder
D) Metallurgy

Answer:

The $2 coupon is just an exscue

Explanation:

Because there is no way you have to go to italy to buy pizza from a $2 coupon

"With the Great Depression came a wave of politicized literature in the 1930s notably exemplified by "The Grapes of Wrath".  

" "The Grapes of Wrath, is the most popular novel by written 'John Steinbeck' which was issued in 1939. It recalls the toughness of "The Great Depression" and evoke empathy for the trials of immigrant land laborers .This book was considered as an "American classic". During the depression people explored new ways to escape it. Thus, literature saw the sudden hike of numerous extraordinary authors. The main theme prevalent during these period was the times before the depression punched in, like in "Gone with the Wind" and "The Grapes of Wrath". "

To learn more about The Great Depression,  

https://brainly.com/question/27291778

#SPJ4

The Sioux disregarded the government's command to stay on their reserve and left the area to hunt buffalo in 1874, according to many of them.

The Sioux were a large group of Native Americans who spoke three closely related languages that belong to the Siouan language family. The word "Sioux" is an acronym for the Ojibwa term "Nadouessioux," which means "Adders," or "foes" in English. The Mdewkanton, Wahpeton, Wahpekute, and Sisseton were members of the Santee, commonly known as the Eastern Sioux, who spoke Dakota. The Yankton and Yanktonai were Nakota-speaking people of the  Sioux Yankton tribe. Speaking Lakota, the Teton are also known as the Western Sioux. They were divided into seven groups: the Sihasapa, also known as the Blackfoot, the Brulé (Upper and Lower), the Hunkpapa, the Miniconjou, the Oglala, the Sans Arcs, and the Oohenonpa, also known as the Two-Kettle.

Learn more about Sioux here

https://brainly.com/question/8761356

#SPJ4

In the conflict over ratification of the Constitution by nine or more state conventions in 1788, Federalist supporters fought for a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution, while Anti-Federalists fought against the creation of a stronger national government and sought to preserve the predecessor to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation.

The Federalists included wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, as well as large property owners in the North. They advocated for weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy over direct democracy. Important for history.

To know more about The Federalists here

https://brainly.com/question/28563784

#SPJ1

Sex remains the same throughout the different cultures while gender varies accordingly.

Sex is very difficult to change while gender, on the other hand, can be changed as is determined by society.

Sex is biologically constructed and gender is socially constructed.

brainliest plz

Answer:

2. People wanted to break free from the Soviet Union and communist rule.

Explanation:

People wanted to break free from the Soviet Union and the communist rule is the statement best explains the existence of resistance movements in Eastern Europe, as the population was suffering because of the regime, and so they began to build a network that would lead them to resistance toward the communist governments.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Plato

Simón Bolívar was known as the “Liberator” because he liberated the northern South America from Spanish rule.

He was famously called by "The Liberator or Spanish El Libertador", he was a Venezuelan soldier and statesman who led the revolutions against Spanish rule in the Viceroyalty of New Granada; he as well served as the president of Gran Colombia (1819–30) and dictator of Peru (1823–26).

As “The Liberator” he helped to liberate four territories which includes New Granada (1819), Venezuela (1821), Quito (1822), and Peru (1824). Therefore, he was known as the “Liberator” because he liberated the northern South America from Spanish rule.

Read more about Simón Bolívar

brainly.com/question/1402690

#SPJ1

Simón Bolívar was known as the “Liberator” because he liberated northern South America from Spanish rule.

This was one of the most important men that existed in the Southern part of the Americas at the time. He was known for the fact that he helped a lot of the South American nations to gain their independence from the Spaniards.

This was the act that earned him the nickname that he was called. These nations were still under the colonial powers of Spain till he stepped in. Hence Simón Bolívar was known as the “Liberator” because he liberated .southern South America from Spanish rule.

Read more on  Simón Bolívar here: https://brainly.com/question/1402690

#SPJ1

Answer:

Indira Gandhi was a female Indian politician and is regarded as the only female Prime minister in India till today.

Benazir Bhutto was a female politician who held the post of Prime Minister in Pakistan.

Corazon Aquino was a female politician held the post of the President of Philippines and is the only woman to hold the position till date.

Golda Meir was a female politician who held the position of the Prime Minister of Israel.

All the women listed above were female politicians who held political positions in their respective country and were instrumental in female involvement in the political sphere.

Explanation:

yes he did accomplish his goal

Answer:

2. America and Europe taking resources from Africa.

3. Because of Africa' untapped natural resources to enrichen the Empires of Europe.

The effects of colonialism and imperialism were different, with colonialism referring to the process of establishing and maintaining colonies, while imperialism involved the extension of power and influence over other nations or territories. The long-term consequences of both for colonized regions were significant, including political, economic, and social effects.

Colonialism typically involved the establishment of settlements in colonized regions, with the colonizers imposing their own political, economic, and cultural systems on the native populations. In contrast, imperialism often involved the imposition of political and economic dominance without the establishment of settlements. Imperialism could be achieved through a variety of means, including military force, economic pressure, or political influence.

The long-term consequences of both colonialism and imperialism were significant for colonized regions. Politically, many colonized regions experienced a loss of sovereignty and self-determination, as well as the imposition of foreign political systems that were not well-suited to local conditions.

---------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

'How did the effects of colonialism differ from those of imperialism, and what were some of the long-term consequences of both for colonized regions?'------------

To know more about colonialism, click here

https://brainly.com/question/1225474

#SPJ1

Answer: Genghis forged the empire by uniting nomadic tribes of the Asian steppe and creating a devastatingly effective army with fast, light, and highly coordinated cavalry. Eventually, the empire dominated Asia from the Black Sea to the Korean peninsula.

Explanation:↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑

Answer:

He combined his power base with traditional Mongol skills, horsemanship, and archery and he built an empire that would then conquer China.

Explanation:

Genghis Khan built the Mongol Empire by combining his power base with Mongol skills, horsemanship, and archery and he then built an empire that would then conquer China.

Hope this helps:))

The Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole peoples are all Indigenous nations of the southeastern region of what is now the United States. This area is commonly referred to as the Southeast or the Southeastern United States, and includes the modern-day states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and parts of Kentucky and Virginia. These Indigenous nations have a long and complex history in the region, with roots dating back thousands of years before European contact.

Answer: we should refer racist as a bad racial word

Answer:

When Zeus was angry, he wou,d make rash decisions, often causing the suffering of many, or cursing someone to have to live differently for the rest of their life.

Answer:

option 3

Explanation:

hey, your answer is option3

Answer:

17

Explanation:

took the test

Answer:

The United States of America in the 1800’s was a rapidly growing country. Many people moved west for religious freedom while others were strong believers in Manifest Destiny. In order to occupy land, settlers had to find land that wasn’t already occupied. Since most of the west was a part of Mexico, this was not easy to do. Luckily, Mexicans also wanted settlers in their western lands because that area was not developed. Mexico invited Americans to settle in their land. However, both countries had many differences. It did not take long before the United States and Mexico went to war. The United States was justified in going to war because Mexico had shed American blood on American soil, Texas (a land that many Mexicans still considered theirs) was an independent republic and had the right to govern itself, and Texas was trying to become part of the United States, which means that the United States had a right to be involved, too.

Mexico had encouraged Americans to settle in the province of Texas, which was part of Mexico at the time. After the Texans and Mexicans fought, Texas won its independence from Mexico in 1836. Now, in 1846, America sent a troop of men lead by General Zachary Taylor to the Texan border to make sure the Mexicans weren’t attempting to attack Texas. This angered the Mexicans since it made it seem like Texas was now allied with America. The dispute that followed led to the death of sixteen Americans. Also, the Mexicans chose to believe that the arrival of General Zachary Taylor was an outright attack, which lead to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma.  This shows that Mexico had taken the first step of fighting the United States. Eventually, the Mexicans were forced to surrender. As to which side fired first, this cannot be determined. In one letter to Congress, James Polk stated, “We have tried every effort at reconciliation. The cup of forbearance had been exhausted even before the recent information from the frontier of the Del Norte. But now, …Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil”.

Before Texas became part of the United States, it was an independent republic. An independent republic has the right to govern itself and set itself apart from other nations. Texas regarded the "Rio del Norte" to be the Texan border. This means that Texas now has the choice to do whatever they wish. Charles Sumner, a state legislator from Massachusetts, said, “…in seeking extension of slavery, (our own citizens denied) the great truths of American freedom” . If Texas is independent, it has the right to own slaves. Also, states in the United States already owned slaves, so the point cannot be argued any further. Sumner also said Americans brought slaves in Mexico in defiance of Mexican law. However, Mexico invited Americans into Mexico and Mexico should have realized that Americans would have different ways. Also, Texas was trying to become part of the United States, which meant that the United States had a right to go to war with Mexico.

Since Mexico could not govern all of its territory, they invited Americans in. Now that Americans were settling in unpopulated Mexican territory, the ratio of Americans to Mexicans increased. Eventually, the American lifestyle took over, and demanded different rights. Velasco-Marquez said the treaty signed between Texas and the U.S. and also the fact that Texas wanted to be annexed to the U.S. was an act of war. Texas had the right to be a part of the U.S., and if Mexico considered this an act of war with Texas, then the U.S. had the right to be involved too . Finally, James Polk said, “The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined…to annex herself to our Union” . If that is true, then America did have the right to declare war.

Once Mexico showed aggression to Texas, the United States had a right to go to war with Mexico because Texas was an independent republic and wanted to be annexed into the United States. Whatever Texas does, Mexico cannot have a stake in it. From these points, it can be concluded that the United States was justified in going to war with Mexico.

Explanation:

Explanation:

As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.

Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.

The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:

Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;

Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);

The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.

A strong central or federal government had the backing of Hamilton. He thought that in order to effectively rule for the benefit of all people, power should be concentrated in the hands of a select group of individuals.

The United States is more appropriately described as a constitutional federal republic, while frequently being called a democracy. The federal democratic republic type of governance is established under the Constitution. In other words, we are a union of 50 independent States that is unbreakable. People in a democracy are in charge of their own government. Because voters select representatives in a free and secret election, it is representational. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively, the authority to act as the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of the federal government.

Here,

Hamilton was a staunch advocate of a strong federal or central government. He believed that a government's authority should be concentrated in the hands of a select group of persons who had the skills and knowledge necessary to lead effectively for the benefit of all the people.

To know more about American system of government,

https://brainly.com/question/633895

#SPJ4

Answer:

1.Pagpatay, ang buhay ay katarungan.

2. Pang-aagaw ng lupa, katarungan ang gumalang sa pagmamay-ari ng lupa.

3. Pang-aapi, katarungan ang pagkalinga at paggalang sa dignidad ng tao.

4. Diskriminasyon sa komunidad, katarungan ang respetuhin at maging ligtas sa komunidad.

Explanation:

Sana makatulong po.

The mention of "palomino" may symbolize a desire for something beautiful and valuable, which you feel you need to work towards earning.

It's natural to feel like you've outgrown certain people or situations in your life, and it seems like you are recognizing that you want more than just someone who is easy and comfortable. Keep striving towards your goals and don't be afraid to let go of what no longer serves you. The excerpt you provided expresses a sense of personal growth and a desire for change. The speaker states that they no longer want to be treated with excessive care or indulgence ("babied") and instead aspire to be deserving of someone named Palomino. They compare their past experiences with boys who had comfortable lives and gentle qualities, seeing them as objects they have outgrown and passed on to someone else named Minoa.

This passage conveys a shift in the speaker's perspective and desires. They feel that they have matured beyond their previous relationships and are seeking something more meaningful and substantial. The mention of "pretty dolls" suggests that the speaker views their past relationships as superficial and lacking depth.

Read more about growth here:https://brainly.com/question/30611694

#SPJ11

The incorrect statement about the Mayflower Compact is that it gave all colonists the right to vote. Only male adult church members were allowed to vote.

The statement about the Mayflower Compact that is NOT correct is: 'it gave all colonists the right to vote'.

The Mayflower Compact was indeed an agreement that established the colonists as a united body.

However, it did not provide the right to vote to every colonist. Only male adult members of the Pilgrims' church had voting rights.

Mayflower Compact promised adult male settlers the right to vote for the Governor and his advisors each year, and It did support the idea of majority rule. But the right to vote was not extended to all colonists.

https://brainly.com/question/11377923

#SPJ2

Answer:

D. The Syrians outlawed Judaism and forced the Israelites into exile.

Explanation:

i just took the test and I did guided notes. I hope this helps yall out:))

p.s. u better make me brainliest lol

Answer:

Its d i also did the test

Explanation:

Answer:

American Civil War - American Civil War - African American troops: The Emancipation Proclamation also allowed Black men to serve in the Union army. This had been illegal under a federal law enacted in 1792 (although African Americans had served in the army in the War of 1812 and the law had never applied to the navy).

The Emancipation Proclamation set blacks free, encouraged them to fight against the South, fight their masters and join the Union army

This is a Proclamation issued by Abraham Lincoln to ended slavery and set all slaves free.

Its was signed on 1863 after the Union's victory against the Confederates in the Battle of Antietam.

In conclusion, the Emancipation Proclamation issued by Abraham Lincoln set blacks free from slavery, encouraged them to fight against the South, fight their masters and join the Union army

Read more about Emancipation Proclamation

brainly.com/question/3368825

#SPJ2