Answer:
Probation officer
Explanation:
The validity of a piece of evidence is called:
implicit bias
O liability
objectivity
directness
admissibility
O
reliability
Which is an example of a president using their election popularity to advance his policies?
a. Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation
b. Reagan and the "trickle down" economic theory
c. Obama and the Affordable Care Act
d. FDR and the New Deal
There are lots of policies. An example of a president using their election popularity to advance his policies is and the Affordable Care Act.
What is Barack Obama famous for?He was said to be born on August 4, 1961. He is known to be the 44th president of the United States and the first African-American president of the United States.
Barack Obama Election was said to be very popular because he was the first black president. His policies of Affordable Care Act was a call for full equality of LGBT community.
Learn more about Barack Obama from
https://brainly.com/question/1125105
Which statement is most true of foot patrolling? /
Answer:
is there a list of statemnts that you forgot orrrrr?
\
Explanation:
Parties and what they do
Interpreting Political Cartoons
1. Who do the three figures in the cartoon represent?
2. What is the significance of their throwing this person into a pool labeled "world
markets"?
3. What is the importance of the sign "sink or swim"?
4. What is the attitude of the cartoonist toward U. S. Labor?
5. Identifying Assumptions What is the assumption about the relationship between U. S.
labor and world markets? Do you think that it is valid?
Explanation:
1 It depends on the specific cartoon and the context in which it was created. The figures could represent politicians, corporations, political parties, or other groups.
2 The action of throwing someone into a pool labeled "world markets" likely represents the forces of globalization and the impact it has on the economy and workers. The person being thrown in could symbolize U.S. labor or the working class.
3 The sign "sink or swim" could indicate the tough competition that U.S. labor faces in the global market, and that it's sink or swim for them in terms of survival.
4 The attitude of the cartoonist is also dependent on the specific cartoon and context, but it may show criticism or concern towards the treatment of U.S. labor and its impact on the economy.
5 The assumption about the relationship between U.S. labor and world markets is that they are competing with each other, and that the global market may not be favorable to U.S. labor. The validity of this assumption may vary and depend on various factors and perspectives.
Frank can type a report in 7 hours. James takes 2 hours to type it. How long will it take the two of them typing together
It will take frank and james approximately 1 hour and 33 minutes (14/9 hours) to type the report together.
to determine how long it will take frank and james to type the report together, we can calculate their combined typing rate.
let's say frank's typing rate is represented as "f report/hour" and james's typing rate is "j report/hour."
we know that frank takes 7 hours to type the report, so we can express his typing rate as:
f = 1 report / 7 hours = 1/7 report/hour
similarly, james takes 2 hours to type the report, so his typing rate is:
j = 1 report / 2 hours = 1/2 report/hour
to find their combined typing rate, we add their individual rates:
combined rate = f + j = 1/7 + 1/2 = 2/14 + 7/14 = 9/14 report/hour
now, we can determine how long it will take them to type the report together by taking the reciprocal of their combined typing rate:
time = 1 / (combined rate) = 1 / (9/14) = 14/9 hours
Learn more about reciprocal here:
https://brainly.com/question/15590281
#SPJ11
faye owns the land on which golden spurs ranch is situated, plus the ranch house, barn, and other structures permanently attached to the land. faye's brother huey owns everything else in the ranch's operation-livestock, feed, and so on. the personal property is owned by
In this situation, Faye owns the land, buildings, and other structures that are permanently attached to the land, such as the ranch house and barn.
This would include any legal rights associated with the land, such as mineral or water rights. Huey, on the other hand, owns all of the personal property associated with the ranch, such as livestock, feed, tack, equipment, and any other items that are not permanently attached to the land.
This means that if the ranch were to be sold, Faye would retain ownership of the land and buildings, while Huey would retain ownership of the personal property. This arrangement is commonly seen in a partnership or joint venture, and the two parties would need to draw up a contract to specify their rights and responsibilities.
Know more about legal rights here
https://brainly.com/question/6658049#
#SPJ11
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The court sentenced
him to 30 years in jail. One year after his trial, Don admits that he withheld evidence that
would have cleared him. He states he did so to protect his twin brother, who actually
committed the crime, but who was dying of cancer at the time. He further states that he
did not want his brother to spend the last years of his life behind bars. His brother has
since died. The evidence is conclusive as to Don's innocence. Should the court set aside his conviction due to the new evidence?
What policies would support the court in not
doing so?
Answer:
Double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The double jeopardy may prevent Don Long from being tried twice.
What is a sentence?A sentence is a set of words that are put together and which has meaning or makes complete sense of something. A sentence is the basic unit of language which expresses or makes a complete thought.
A sentence is formed by following the grammatical basic rules of syntax. For example:" John is running". A complete sentence has at least a subject and a main verb to state (declare) a complete thought. For example: Kate walks.
The first letter of the first word in a sentence will always be capital. At the end of the sentence there is a punctuation mark depending on whether it is a statement, a question, a command, a request or an exclamation.
Learn more about sentence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29140135
#SPJ2
What legal term is applicable to the accused party in the given scenario? Journalist Larry David was arrested for laundering drugs. The court has appointed a lawyer to fight for David on his behalf. In the courtroom, the judge and jury address David as the
Since Journalist Larry David was arrested for laundering drugs and the court has appointed a lawyer to fight for David on his behalf. In the courtroom, the judge and jury would address David as the defendant.
What is a judicial system?A judicial system is also referred to as a legal system and it can be defined as the system of law courts that administer justice, especially by adjudicating legal disagreements, disputes, infractions, interpreting laws, defending the accused, as well as applying the appropriate law in legal cases such as civil and criminal cases.
Generally speaking, there are four (4) stages of the legal (judicial) process within a Judicial system and these include the following:
PretrialTrialDispositionAppealsWho is a defendant?In a criminal case such drug laundering, a defendant can be defined as a legal terminology that is used to describe or refer to an individual who is accused of committing a crime, and brought before the judge and jury by a prosecutor.
Read more on defendant here: brainly.com/question/10459518
#SPJ1
maddie cannot read. she signs a cell phone agreement without being able to read the document. this is an example of:_____.
Maddie signing a cell phone agreement without being able to read the document is an example of an issue related to informed consent, specifically a lack of informed consent.
Informed consent is the process of obtaining permission from an individual before proceeding with a course of action, such as a medical procedure, research study, or contractual agreement. Informed consent requires that the individual providing consent has the capacity to understand the information being presented and to make an informed decision about whether to proceed. In this case, if Maddie cannot read the cell phone agreement, she may not have the capacity to understand the terms of the agreement or the implications of signing it. As a result, she may not be able to provide truly informed consent, which can raise ethical and legal concerns. It is important for individuals and organizations to ensure that individuals have the capacity to provide informed consent before proceeding with any action that requires their consent.
To know more about consent click here:
brainly.com/question/29220731
#SPJ4
because her ruling ended a 1995 strike, justice sonia sotomayor is known as the judge that saved what?
Answer:Of course, the Major League Baseball Players Association filed suit and the case ended up before U.S. District Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a native of the Bronx who was an enthusiastic New York Yankees fan. Sotomayor ruled in favor of the players union; and appeals courts agreed. That ended what was a 232-day strike.
The remedy for breach of contract may depend on the classification of contracts as _______ law with ________ rights in dispute. (Choose two correct answers
Answer:
The remedy for breach of contract may depend on the classification of contracts as common law with legal rights in dispute.
Explanation:
The common law is the body of law that is derived from judicial decisions, rather than from statutes or constitutions, and it governs many areas of contract law. Legal rights in dispute refer to the rights that are the subject of the contract dispute, such as the right to payment or the right to performance.
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
The images show what happened to two people who invested $1,000.
Gale starts with $1,000.
Gale's investments:
- Savings account: $200,1% retum
- Mutual fund: $600, 7% return
- Stock:
$200, -10% return
Alex starts with $1,000.
Alex's investments:
- Stock:
$1,000, -10%
return
Value one year later:
Profit:
$1,024
$24
Value one year later:
Profit:
$900
($100)
Which investment advice would Gale most likely give to Alex?
The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
What are mutual funds?A mutual fund is an organization that brings collectively cash from many human beings and invests it in stocks, bonds, or different properties.
The mixed holdings of stocks, bonds, or different properties the fund owns are called its portfolio.
Hence, The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/3151209
#SPJ5
The best investing advice Gale would probably provide Alex is to put money into mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than other types of investments.
What is mutual fund?A mutual fund is a business that pools the money from several investors and uses it to buy stocks, bonds, or other types of real estate. The portfolio of the fund refers to its assortment of stocks, bonds, and various real estate interests.
The primary investments of mutual funds are frequently categorized as money market funds, bond or fixed income funds, stock or equity funds, or hybrid funds. Index funds, which are passively managed funds that follow the performance of an index, are another classification for funds. As a result, Gale will probably advise Alex to invest in mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than any other type of investment.
Learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/31417979
#SPJ7
Probably the full options are:
A. mutual fund
B. natural resources
C. government bonds
D. certificate of deposit
unintentional harm, injury, or negligence is covered under which type of law?
Unintentional harm, injury, or negligence is generally covered under civil law, specifically under the area of law known as tort law.
Tort law deals with civil wrongs and provides remedies for individuals who have suffered harm or injury due to the actions or omissions of others.
When someone unintentionally causes harm to another person or their property through negligence or carelessness, the injured party can seek compensation through a civil lawsuit. Examples of unintentional harm covered under tort law include car accidents caused by negligent driving, medical malpractice cases resulting from a healthcare provider's negligence, or slip and fall accidents due to unsafe premises.
Unlike criminal law, which focuses on intentional acts, tort law addresses the consequences of unintentional actions and aims to provide remedies and compensation to the injured party.
LEARN MORE ABOUT tort law here: brainly.com/question/4313662
#SPJ11
which kind of court would handle a criminal case in which the accused is charged with illegally acquiring guns in mexico and selling them to someone in california?
A criminal case involving the illegal acquisition of guns in Mexico and their sale to someone in California would typically be handled by a federal court, specifically the United States District Court for the district where the crime occurred.
The reason for this is that the crime falls under federal jurisdiction because it entails breaking both state and federal laws as well as crossing international and interstate borders.
Federal offences, such as the unlawful importation or exportation of firearms, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal court system, as do other federal offences.
As a result, the matter would be heard and decided by a federal court.
For such more question on criminal:
https://brainly.com/question/740707
#SPJ11
Why are drivers responsible for the safety of vulnerable roadway users?
A. They are usually better acquainted with safety and traffic laws.
B. They are usually larger, faster and more protected than VRUS.
C. They are legally bound to take care of VRUs on the roadway.
A , Drivers do do tests on traffic laws and road safety so they are the ones responsible for the safety of VRUs
Drivers are responsible for the safety of vulnerable roadways users because They are usually better acquainted with safety and traffic laws.
Why do drivers exist?Driver software enables your operating system to launch, operate, and manage a hardware device. In other words, drivers are the translators that allow your operating system to instruct the hardware components of your computer to carry out your instructions. Drivers are the software packages in charge of ensuring that your hardware and operating system (such as Windows, Linux, macOS, etc.) are properly communicating with one another.
What do roadways mean?Transportation of people and products via roads is referred to as "roadways." A road is a path connecting two locations that has been constructed or improved to allow for travel.
To learn more about roadways here
https://brainly.com/question/18522414
#SPJ2
2. Helen toured a town house built by Thames. While inspecting the kitchen, she opened a cabinet; the cabinet door fell and struck her on the head. An examination revealed that no screws were affixed to the door to secure it to the cabinet. She filed suit against the cabinetmaker and offered proof of her injury relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Should she recover
Answer:
The accident is her proof.
Explanation:
So, here are the things that needs to be noted in order to answer this problem/ question effectively and efficiently;
=> the house is built by Thames.
=> During Helen's kitchen inspection, "she opened a cabinet; the cabinet door fell and struck her on the head. "
=> It was shown that no screws were affixed to the door to secure it to the cabinet.
=> Helen filed suit against the cabinetmaker and offered proof of her injury relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur''
So, THE DOCTRINE OF RES IPSA LOQUITUR is used by injured people or Individual filling suit against another party. This is done in order to sue the accused of being "negligent" and make sure that the accused pay for the damages/injuries. Thus is what Helen is going to use to "fight" the cabinetmake in the court of law.
in the american constitution, which clause deals with civil liberty issues?
In the American Constitution, the clause that deals with civil liberty issues is the Due Process Clause.
The Due Process Clause can be found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause applies to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause applies to state and local governments.
The Due Process Clause ensures that individuals are protected from arbitrary or unfair treatment by the government. It requires that any person facing potential deprivation of life, liberty, or property be given notice and a fair opportunity to be heard before a neutral decision-maker. The clause establishes a fundamental principle of fairness and procedural safeguards in legal proceedings.
The Due Process Clause has been interpreted by the courts to include various civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, privacy, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. It serves as a crucial safeguard to ensure that the government respects and upholds the rights of individuals in the United States.
To learn more about Due Process Clause, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29398298
#SPJ11
the defense of marriage act was struck down, in part, by the supreme court justices in ________.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was struck down, in part, by the Supreme Court Justices in the landmark case of United States v. Windsor in 2013.
The court ruled that Section 3 of DOMA, which defined marriage as between one man and one woman for federal purposes, was unconstitutional. The decision paved the way for same-sex couples to receive federal benefits and recognition, but it did not legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. It was not until the court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 that same-sex marriage was legalized in all 50 states. The Windsor decision was seen as a significant victory for LGBTQ rights and a step towards greater equality under the law.
To learn more about Supreme Court, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29604190
#SPJ11
Match the correct word to the definition.
Question 5 options:
a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster
the study of the rights and duties of citizens
a member of a community of people who owe loyalty to a government and, in turn, are entitled to its protection
a foreign-born resident of the United States who has not been naturalized
the rights and duties of citizens
1.
Citizen
2.
Civics
3.
Citizenship
4.
Alien
5.
Refugee
Answer:
I'm going to answer your question in order to make more simpler for you :)
1. Refugee
2. Civics
3. Citizens
4. Immigrant or Alien
5. Citizenship
1. Citizen - a member of a community of people who owe loyalty to a government and, in turn, are entitled to its protection.
2. Civics - the study of the rights and duties of citizens.
A citizen is a member of a specific country or nation who holds a legally recognized status and has certain rights, privileges, and responsibilities within that country.
3. Citizenship - a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster.
4. Alien - a foreign-born resident of the United States who has not been naturalized.
5. Refugee - a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster.
Learn more about Citizen here:
https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ3
which standard asks a judge to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence at a preliminary hearing that could be sent to a jury at a real trial
The standard that asks a judge to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence at a preliminary hearing that could be sent to a jury at a real trial is called the probable cause standard.
Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a judge to determine if there is enough evidence in the prosecutor's case to justify proceeding to trial. At a preliminary hearing, a judge is asked to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence that could be sent to a jury at a real trial.
A probable cause hearing is a preliminary hearing in which the prosecutor presents evidence to the judge to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed by the defendant. It is important to note that the probable cause standard is not a high standard, but rather, it is a low standard that is only meant to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed.
Learn more about probable cause https://brainly.com/question/28399684
#SPJ11
According to Goldstein, what is the proper role of politics in policing, and what is an improper role?
Criminal justice masterworks : a history of ideas about crime, law, police, and corrections
According to Herman Goldstein, the proper role of politics in policing is allocating resources to ensure adequate problem-oriented policing followed by close monitoring of police activities.
Political influences should not have a place in policing a society. According to Goldstein, policing is itself an aberration in a free society. Adding politics to the activities of the police department will decrease society's freedom and individual liberty and complicate societal relationships.
In dealing with crime and law enforcement, police should be mindful of social and physical disorders and help the government curtail such occurrences. The improper role of politics in policing occurs when policing is used by politicians to subject opposition members to oppression or harassment.
Thus, the proper role of politics in policing is to ensure that there are adequate resources for policing, monitoring the outcome of policing in the society, and not intervening in policing based on political affiliations.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/22808563
Attic Dwellers Sometimes, animals like rats, mice, and squirrels will climb into an attic. They like to chew on things. It is not good if they decide to chew on electrical wires. If they do, this can cause a fire. So, it is important to make it hard for these animals to get under your roof. Some people try to get rid of these unwanted house guests by putting out mouse traps in the attic. Others might call an exterminator. This is a person who comes to someone's house to get rid of these animals. 2 An exterminator is a person who goes to someone's house to get rid of rats and mice. Why would someone want to call an exterminator to go into the attic? A. to tell the rats and mice to leave the attic B. to feed the rats and mice in the attic C. to keep the house from catching on fire D. to cut the electrical wires in the house
Answer:
C. to keep the house from catching on fire
Explanation:
Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.
When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.
An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.
In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.
So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire
Identify two strengths and two weaknesses with women in our current correctional system ability to handle needs of women in mental health and substance abuse
Two strengths of the current correctional system's ability to handle the needs of women in mental health and substance abuse include increased awareness and specialized programs. However, two weaknesses lie in limited resources and the lack of gender-responsive approaches.
How does the current correctional system fare in addressing the mental health and substance abuse needs of women?The current correctional system demonstrates strengths in addressing the mental health and substance abuse needs of women through increased awareness of these issues and the implementation of specialized programs. This indicates progress in recognizing the unique challenges faced by women offenders. However, weaknesses persist, such as limited resources allocated to adequately address the complex needs of women, including mental health treatment and substance abuse programs. Additionally, the correctional system often lacks gender-responsive approaches, failing to fully consider the specific needs and experiences of women in their rehabilitation and reintegration efforts.
Addressing the mental health and substance abuse needs of women in the correctional system requires a comprehensive and gender-responsive approach. It is crucial to allocate sufficient resources to provide adequate mental health treatment and substance abuse programs tailored to women's specific circumstances. Moreover, adopting gender-responsive approaches that account for the unique needs and experiences of women in the criminal justice system can significantly improve outcomes and promote successful rehabilitation and reintegration.
Learn more about substance abuse
brainly.com/question/27460141
#SPJ11
Steps in the bank reconciliation process
Answer:
Steps:
Explanation:
1: Compare the bank account balance to the cash balance on your books
2: Scrutinize your bank statement
3: Scrutinize your cash book
4: Adjust the balance of your bank account
5: Adjust the balance of your books
6: Record the reconciliation
(Hope this helps?)
Hanna, 18 years old, is over six-feet tall. She has an X-ray exam that shows that her long bones are continuing to grow. Eventually, a thorough examination shows that she has a tumor growing in her: Group of answer choices posterior pituitary. pineal gland. adrenal medulla. anterior pituitary.
Which of the following initial written agreements is NOT legally
binding?
A) Memorandum of understanding
B) Letter of intent
C) Mixed document
D) Impossible to determine
Answer: A) Memorandum of understanding
Explanation:
LMNOP Corp. has been convicted under the Sherman Act for two distinct and separate violations. LMNOP may be fined as much as _____ for these two violations.
Answer:
200 million dollars.
Explanation:
The Sherman Law is an anti-trust law implemented in the year 1980 to outlaw market monopolization and anticompetitive agreements among businesses and corporations. The Sherman Antitrust Act states that corporates that violate the law would be subjected to a fine of about 100 million dollars per violations.
Therefore, if LMNOP Corp. has been convicted of two distinct and separate violations under the the Sherman Act, LMNOP may be fined as much as 200 million dollars for these two violations.
HELP! FOR LAW STUDIES. 100 POINTS!!!
"The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."
—Patrick Henry
From what you know about the Constitution, do you agree with Patrick Henry's statement? Why or why not?
Patrick Henry was a leader of the Anti-Federalists. How does this quote support their position on the Constitution?
How does Henry's statement reflect the idea of social contract? How does the idea of social contract protect people's natural and individual rights?
What is the current ruling on drug testing minors in public schools? Do you agree or disagree?
Answer:The most valuable end of government is the liberty of its inhabitants. No possible advantages can compensate for the loss of this privilege."—Patrick Henry1.
Explanation:
A blood droplet has a width of 5 mm and a length of 6 mm. What is the
angle of impact?
Explanation:
56 degree angle.