Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
Answers
Related Questions
Receiving less and less enjoyment from a second and then a third serving of ice cream is an example of ________.
1) the law of diminishing marginal utility
2) the law of excessive returns
3) the law of increasing total utility
Answers
The example of receiving less and less enjoyment from a second and then a third serving of ice cream is an illustration of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
The law of diminishing marginal utility is an economic principle that states that as a person consumes more and more of a particular good or service, the additional satisfaction, or utility, derived from each additional unit of consumption gradually decreases.
In other words, the more of a good or service a person consumes, the less satisfaction they will receive from each additional unit.
The example of receiving less enjoyment from a second and then a third serving of ice cream is a classic illustration of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
When a person eats their first serving of ice cream, they may experience a high level of satisfaction and enjoyment. However, as they continue to eat more and more ice cream, the level of satisfaction they receive from each additional serving gradually decreases.
By the second or third serving, they may feel less satisfied or even begin to feel sick.
This phenomenon occurs because the first serving of ice cream satisfies the person's initial desire for sweetness and coolness, which is a significant source of utility for them.
However, as they continue to consume more ice cream, their initial desire is satisfied, and the marginal utility of each additional serving decreases.
The law of diminishing marginal utility has significant implications for both consumers and producers. For consumers, it suggests that it may be more efficient to purchase smaller quantities of a good or service to maximize their overall satisfaction.
For producers, it suggests that they may need to offer a wider variety of products or make changes to their pricing strategy to maintain customer interest and demand.
Overall, the law of diminishing marginal utility is a fundamental concept in economics that helps to explain how individuals and markets behave. The example of receiving less enjoyment from a second and then a third serving of ice cream serves as an excellent illustration of this principle in action.
To learn more about diminishing marginal utility, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30391995
#SPJ11
1. What are the steps a bill takes before it becomes a law?
Answers
Answer:
Well, A bill is born and being proposed the bill is referred to the committee, Which at this point the bill is examined carefully by the committee. Then, The bill is being marked up by the subcommittee
Committee action to report
the bill
Voting
And, If the bill passed the voting, it's referred to other chamber
Conference committee action, After the house and senate approve the bill, It can be brought up to the president. Hope That Helps!!~
What is the admissibility of character evidence?
Answers
The purpose for which character evidence is offered will determine whether or not it is admissible during a trial.
It is not admissible to use evidence of a person's character or personality traits to demonstrate that they behaved in a particular way on a given occasion. The "propensity" rule which goes by this name, is meant to stop unjustified bias against the defendant. For instance it would typically be improper to introduce evidence that a defendant has a history of violence in order to establish that they committed a particular act of violence.
The propensity rule does have a few exceptions, though. For instance, if a defendant's character or trait of character is offered to prove another relevant fact, like motivation, intent or the lack of error then it may be admissible. It may be possible to prove that the victim was the aggressor in a physical altercation in some circumstances by introducing evidence of the victim's character.
Learn more about character evidence at:
brainly.com/question/31845492
#SPJ4
What is a main difference between the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament?
The Congress is made of two chambers, the House and the Senate, but the Parliament is only one body.
The Parliament deals only with matters of taxation.
Government ministers may not hold office and belong to the Parliament at the same time.
The British courts do not have the authority to declare acts of Parliament against their constitution.
Answers
The U.S. Congress consists of two chambers, the House and the Senate, whereas the British Parliament is a single body.
1. The U.S. Congress: The United States Congress is composed of two separate chambers - the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral structure ensures checks and balances within the legislative branch of the U.S. government.
The House of Representatives is based on the population of each state, with each state having a varying number of representatives. The Senate, on the other hand, consists of two senators from each state, regardless of the state's population size.
2. The British Parliament: The British Parliament, also known as the Westminster Parliament, operates as a unicameral body. It comprises the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
The House of Commons is elected by the public, while the House of Lords is composed of appointed members, including life peers, bishops, and hereditary peers.
3. Taxation Matters: While the U.S. Congress has the authority to address all aspects of legislation, the British Parliament primarily deals with matters of legislation, including taxation. Tax-related decisions, such as introducing or amending taxes, fall under the jurisdiction of the Parliament.
4. Government Ministers and Parliament: In the British system, government ministers can simultaneously hold office and be members of the Parliament. This allows ministers to actively participate in legislative debates and decision-making processes. In contrast, members of the U.S. Congress cannot hold cabinet positions in the executive branch simultaneously.
5. Judicial Authority: The British courts do not possess the power to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional or against the constitution. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty in the United Kingdom affirms that Parliament is the supreme legal authority, and its acts cannot be overturned by the judiciary based on constitutionality alone.
In summary, while both the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament are legislative bodies, they differ in their structure, taxation matters, the involvement of government ministers, and the judicial authority to declare acts of Parliament unconstitutional.
For more such questions on British Parliament, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30792867
#SPJ8
Si tuvieras la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo (sentimiento de superioridad de un grupo étnico que conlleva a discriminar a grupos distintos colocándolos en el nivel de inferiores). ¿Qué ley propondrías y cuáles serán sus principales características? (5 puntos)
Answers
Answer:
Si tuviese la oportunidad de crear una ley en contra del Racismo, propondría crear una normativa que sancione con penas graduales a quienes incurran en conductas discriminatorias. Así, crearía un registro público de delitos racistas, donde se registrarían los delitos cometidos por cada persona, la cual tendría cada vez mayores penas según vaya reincidiendo en sus conductas: pasando desde los trabajos comunitarios hasta las multas, las inhabilitaciones para determinadas actividades o incluso la prisión en ciertos casos de gravedad.
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do?
Answers
can students get Married To school Teachers
Answers
They can!! When they are 18 of course. While it is a little weird to get married to someone who used to TEACH you, love has no boundaries (except it's a child then wth you p e d o)
May I have help on question 3 on The drivers sign Test I’ll give you brainliest
Answers
Answer:
it is providing you and advance notice that the incoming speed limit that it would be 45MPH
Explanation:
whenever you see one of those signs with a speed limit with a arrow pointing top it is saying that futher ahead speed limit will be 45 or whatever number it has.
why the Third Circuit Court of Appeals found that there was sufficient evidence to uphold the Defendant’s conviction for securities fraud/insider trading
Answers
Explanation:
The law of insider trading has been called everything from a "theoretical mess" to "astonishingly dysfunctional," with calls for change from Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission to clarify the scope of the prohibition. But is the law really so bad? The elements are now well established, despite gray areas around the edges like other white collar crimes. Congress and the general public have embraced insider trading as something clearly wrongful. If the law needs to be changed, the most likely push would be to expand it by adopting the possession theory of liability used in Rule 14e-3 for tender offers and the European Union that makes trading on almost any confidential information subject to prosecution.
Assume that you are the Food and Beverage Director of the Manila Hotel. You are planning for your New Year’s Eve gala and require a large amount of wine and champagne. You conduct a competitive bidding process with the purveyors in your area and, based on quality and price, you place a very large order (in excess of ₱2,000,000.00) with a single purveyor. One week later, you received a case of very expensive champagne, delivered to your home with a nice note from the purveyor’s representative stating how much it appreciated the order and that the purveyor is really looking forward to doing business with you in the years ahead.
Answers
Before consuming the Champagne, confirm with the vendor whether it is a gift or a sample.
Detailed explanation:-
Case 1: If the champagne is a giftIf the Champagne is a gift, check your corporate policy to see if the staff members may accept gifts from the vendor that was chosen following a competitive bidding process.
If employees are permitted to accept gifts, ascertain whether there is a cap on the amount and type of gifts they may accept.
Accept the gift and send an appreciation of it to the appropriate person in accordance with the company's policy if the policy permits employees to do so and the champagne meets all the requirements for gifts that they may accept.
If corporate policy prohibits employees from accepting any kind of present or the gift does not meet the requirements of the company policy, you must return the gift right away and notify the relevant authority in accordance with the company's policy.
Case 2: If it's a sample of ChampagneIf the Champagne is a sample, you can request that the vendor submit it to the business in accordance with the vendor sample policy and direct him to the appropriate authority.
To Know more about requirements
https://brainly.com/question/2929431
#SPJ9
which key player in a bankruptcy proceeding does the court assign to administer the case?
Answers
In a bankruptcy proceeding, the key player that the court assigns to administer the case is called the bankruptcy trustee.
The trustee is a neutral third party appointed by the court to oversee the bankruptcy process and ensure that all parties involved comply with the relevant laws and regulations. The trustee is responsible for collecting and managing the debtor's assets, reviewing and approving creditor claims, and distributing funds to creditors according to the priority of their claims. Additionally, the trustee has the power to investigate the debtor's financial affairs, object to discharge of certain debts, and initiate legal action against parties that have harmed the bankruptcy estate. The trustee plays a critical role in ensuring the fairness and efficiency of the bankruptcy process.
To know more about bankruptcy trusteeclick here:
brainly.com/question/24232271
#SPJ4
Freire’s notion of praxis
Answers
Paulo Freire defines praxis in Pedagogy of the Oppressed as "reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed." Through praxis, oppressed people can acquire a critical awareness of their own condition, and, with teacher-students and students-teachers, struggle for liberation
The current rate of re-election success among Texas legislators is
around 50%
around 2%
around 60%
around 90%
Answers
The current rate of re-election success among Texas legislators is D round 90%.
What does this mean ?Texas incumbents have an impressive success rate of nearly 90% in re-election bids.
This can be ascribed to a number of factors, including the perks afforded by incumbency (e.g. name recognition and resource access), political partisanship, and the population's politics and cultural context.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on rate of reelection at https://brainly.com/question/29670171
#SPJ1
Simon belonged to a political group responsible for blowing up several corporate offices of multinational companies. Acting on a tip, the police surround Simon in front of the offices of a major corporation and ask him where the dynamite is. Simon tells them. His statements are?
Answers
Simon's statements would likely be admissible as evidence against him in court as they were made voluntarily to the police officers.
Simon's statements are incriminating as he admitted to possessing dynamite, which is illegal and dangerous. His admission also links him to the political group responsible for the bombings, making him a suspect in the case.
By cooperating with the police and providing information about the location of the dynamite, Simon may be able to negotiate a plea deal or receive a lighter sentence. Simon's statements could be seen as a confession to a crime and could be used to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, Simon's statements could also be used to locate the dynamite and prevent any harm to the public.Learn more about evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/20840904
#SPJ11
When first accused of committing a crime, a guilty person will most likely deny the accusation immediately repeat the accusation in the form of a question say nothing try to blame someone else
Answers
Answer:
repeat the accusation in the form of a question.
Explanation:
A law can be defined as the system of principles, regulations and rules established by legislature, that is adopted in a community, society or country to regulate the actions of its citizens, members or employees.
Thus, law is a tool used by the judiciary, lawyers, individuals, organizations, and even government to ensure everybody is well behaved, non-criminal and civil in their actions. Therefore, a law creates the foundation for ethical behavior.
In circumstances where there are aberration, the law is enforced as a punishment and penalty for wrongdoings or misdeeds.
Generally, there are various types of law and these includes; criminal law, constitutional law, intellectual property law, corporate law, international law, family law, civil law, etc.
Typically, when a person is first accused of committing a particular crime, a guilty person will most likely repeat the accusation in the form of a question. This action is usually done by the guilty party so as to feign ignorance of the purported crime and presumably just hearing of such crime or event for the first time ever.
What is your feeling on sentencing guidelines ,and do you believe they are used the same in every case before the court
Answers
Sentencing guidelines are useful for optimizing and speeding up some legal processes, however, we cannot believe that they are used in the same way in all court cases.
What are the sentencing guidelines?They are legal standards.These are guidelines for judges.They are descriptions of how certain criminal cases should be evaluated.Sentencing guidelines are very useful and speed up the legal process by allowing standards of assessment that allow greater clarity in assessing the nature and seriousness of the crime, helping to finalize the case.
However, as these cases have different characteristics and many different elements, the sentencing guidelines cannot be used in the same way in all cases and must adapt to each situation.
Learn more about sentencing guidelines:
https://brainly.com/question/31547228
#SPJ1
Consider the effects of making the European Union’s privacy standards federal law here in the United States. What groups would support a movement to do so? What groups would oppose the move? What would be the effects on business?
Answers
The interest groups would support movement to making European Union’s privacy standards federal law in United States.
What is federal law?The body of laws that nation's federal government has produced is known as federal law. A federal government is created when a collection of political entities, such as states or provinces, joins forces to establish a federation, ceding much of their individual sovereignty and power to the federal government while keeping or reserving other, more restricted authorities. A defined geographic territory as a result has two or more levels of governance. Federal law is the governing body of the common central government. Federalism in the United States was fundamentally altered by this, which established the superior connection between federal laws and conflicting State laws. The United States Code contains a list of federal statutes.
To learn more about federal law, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26371147
#SPJ1
An effective claim for an argumentative essay is
Answers
Answer:
An effective claim in an 'argumentative essay' is a true statement that can be proven using 'facts and cannot be countered'Hence, effective claim in an argumentative essay will be a true statement which is not hypothetical and can be proved with the help of evidences and facts.
Explanation:
the facts and data that support a statement of opinion in the text. the statement that takes a position on an issue or controversy. the explanation of how the evidence in the text supports a reason. the quotations from primary sources that are used to validate a fact.
have a good day
Carly files a complaint against delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on.
Answers
Carly files a complaint against the delivery corporation, charging that she has not been paid and wants to recover the unpaid amount, plus interest. The complaint and a summons will most likely be served on the corporation's registered agent.
A registered agent refers to an official who is designated to receive official papers for the business. In United States business law, specifically, these registered agents are designated to receive service of process (SOP) in times when the firm or entity is a party in any sort of legal action. These agents can be either an officer or employees of the firm or a third party.
A registered agent is entitled to receive service of process notices, government correspondence, and compliance-related documents on behalf of the firm. A registered agent is also known as a resident agent or statutory agent.
Learn more about registered agents:
brainly.com/question/13383140
#SPJ4
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answers
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
hakim says, "in the united states, people drop out of college because they aren't motivated and can't do the work." what should a developmentalist answer?
Answers
Developmentalists recognize that individual differences in cognitive, social, and emotional development, as well as social and cultural factors, can influence a student's ability to succeed in college. For example, some students may struggle with learning disabilities or mental health issues that impact their ability to perform academically. Other students may face financial hardships, lack of support from family and peers, or cultural barriers that make it difficult for them to succeed in college.
Moreover, developmentalists recognize that motivation is not solely an individual characteristic, but it is also influenced by the environment. Students who attend schools with supportive and engaging learning environments may be more motivated to succeed than those in less supportive environments.
Therefore, instead of attributing college dropout solely to lack of motivation and inability to do the work, it is important to understand the complex interplay of individual and environmental factors that contribute to student success, and to develop programs and interventions that address these factors to support all students in achieving their educational goals.
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
Answers
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
brainliest for brainliest anyone down for trade u make the question
Answers
Brainliest?
what would you say to those who believe Africa lacks expertise in responding to pandemic
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Israeli lawyer Moshe Strugano says, its not an easy situation to handle for any country even the biggest and largest one have suffered a lot from pandemic and as the time passes the condition is still worse in some part of the world. So blaming only Africa to not handling pandemic properly is not good. You should compare their economic and health condition as compare to other part of the world.
A witness in a court case can never talk about the crime outside the courtroom.
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
False.
Reason:
it seems to make sense that you can talk about the case out side the court room.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Pleaseeeeeeee answer
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
36. D
37. C
38. B
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery. Why was this act a violation of both criminal and civil law
Answers
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
There are mainly two categories of law which are the criminal law and the civil law.
Franklin Felon shot and killed two people during a robbery is both a violation of both criminal and civil law. Criminal law is a law that has to do with crimes while civil law is the law that has to do with private matters or dispute.
It is both a violation of both criminal and civil law because since Franklin intentionally killed two people, he can be charged with homicide in criminal court. Also, based on civil law, he can be sued for wrongful death.
Civil disobedience ________. a. respects both positive and natural law. b. violates positive and natural law c. seeks to change natural law.
Answers
Answer:
"Option a" seems to be the correct solution.
Explanation:
A conscientious or even a thoughtful person really shouldn't comply or conform by either a legal statute that would be deeply unequal. Civil disobedience could reinforce the separation of powers by committing to either the reversal or adjustment of unfair or significantly wrong regulations until the failure to obey the framework benefit of the entire does have a capability of winning effect.Other alternatives weren’t linked to the sort of situation in question. So "Option a" is the right experience.
1. Mr. Rodrigo alyas Digong was held fragrante delicto for taking cartons of Sardines can goods, accused argued that he should only be convicted of frustrated theft for taking can goods from the supermarket since he was immediately apprehended by the security guard. Is the contention of Digong correct? What crime did he committed? Explain why? ( 10 Points)
2. Tiborcio fired at Kurdapyo’s room, although in reality, the latter was not present in his room; thus, Tiborcio failed to kill him. If inherent impossibility of accomplishing the crime. What factual crime does committed by Tiborcio? Explain. ( 10 points )
3. Patrolman Gunggong dropped a hand grenade inside a house, killing Pikoy instantly and causing Butog, Pokang, Dagul & Mokong to suffer shrapnel wounds on their bodies. What crime committed by Patrolman Gunggong for the grave negligence and mistake he committed? ( 10 Points )
Answers
In this case, Digong's contention is not entirely correct. He committed the crime of attempted theft.
What crime did Digong commit and why?The crime committed by Digong in this case is known as attempted theft and not frustrated theft because an attempted theft occurs when the offender commences the execution of the crime by overt acts but fails to complete it by reason of some cause or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.
In this case, he took cartons of sardines can goods from the supermarket which is an overt act of theft but was immediately apprehended by the security guard which prevented him from completing the crime. This makes his offense an attempted theft as he had the intent to steal but was not able to complete the crime.
Read more about sales contract
brainly.com/question/28326714
#SPJ1
licensees may be disciplined under illinois real estate license law for many actions. under this law, the idfpr has the authority to:
Answers
Even though it is referred to as "casual," an informal conference might really have the disciplinary effects on your professional licence, such as the censure, the reprimand, the probation, licence suspension, or licence revocation.
Under the Illinois real estate licence law, the licensees may face the sanctions for a variety of the infractions. The breach of a licence and the certificate condition is cause for the discipline. operate a business in a dishonest, unethical, or inept way. become ineligible to possess a licence or certification. becoming no longer "fit and proper" to possess a licence.
To know more about Illinois:
brainly.com/question/13405245
#SPJ4