Answers
Cole is drafting a legal pleading and needs to input the party names and case number, such action is called case caption.
The heading or introductory clause of a pleading, known as the caption or title, includes the name, address, and phone number of the attorney, the names of the parties, the name of the court, the county where the action is filed, and frequently the term of the court as well as the case's docket or calendar number. Regarding the format of the caption, each jurisdiction has its own set of regulations. For instance, every complaint must contain a caption that includes the name of the court, a title, a file number, and a Rule 7 designation in accordance with Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In a legal context, the words "caption" are also frequently used to mean:
A legal document's caption is the portion that indicates where, when, and under what authority it was seized, found, or performed. Examples of such documents include an indictment, commission, etc.In the context of the "taking" necessary for theft, the phrase caption refers to "getting possession of the property," as defined in this case from California.To learn more about pleading please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/20814132
#SPJ4
Related Questions
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Answers
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
California has been referred to as "the ungovernable state". Several governors have attempted to effectively govern the state in conjunction with the state legislature and courts. From the lecture summary, mention some examples of governors struggling with this "ungovernability".
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The California Republic is a western state of the United State. It shares its border with Mexico along the ocean, Pacific. In 2009, California is declared all over the media and the public as the "ungovernable state". They claimed that the Governors were not able to govern the state properly in conjunction to the legislature and the courts of the state. Decentring is used to remark the governance of the state that the governors have a dominion on the rule and that the directives are happening within the communal factors.
Some of the possible reasons are :
1. Proposition 13 : The effect of the proposition 13, the property tax limit measures that was passed in the year 1978 is the part of damage the initiative did to California.
2.Budget Initiative
3. Gerrymandering
4. Terms limit
5. Two thirds votes of the legislature to pass a budget.
6. Boom and the bust taxation.
write a descriptioon about the Kansas City Expirement.
Answers
The Kansas City Preventative Patrol Experiment was designed to test the assumptions of deterrence theory in relation to marked police patrol. In particular, researchers wanted to see if an increase in police patrols could lead to a decrease in crime and a decrease in the public's fear of crime.
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answers
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
Should Mr. King and the real estate agents have disclosed the information to Mrs. Reed? Was there an ethical obligation to do so?
Answers
Mr. King and the real estate agents should have disclosed the information to Mrs. Reed. There's an ethical obligation to do so.
An ethical duty or obligation refers to a moral requirement for an individual to follow a particular course of action. Moral obligation arises out of considerations of being right or wrong.
Based on the complete information, Mr. King and the real estate agents should have disclosed the information to Mrs. Reed. It is important and ethical for real estate agents to disclose important and historical events about a particular place to the purchaser. Therefore, Mrs. Reed has to know about the area that she wants to purchase.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/25321593
Common Law
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a grand jury, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified offense, usually a felony
Governmental department for keeping order
Law of a country based on customs
A formal, written accusation submitted bt the court by a prosecutor, alleging a
specified person has committed a specified crime
The act of something that is against the law
To summon one to do the right
Answers
This road sign means
A no turns in the direction of the arrow are allowed
B) all tums in the opposite direction are allowed
C) you must turn in the direction of the arrow
D) the road has a dangerous curve in the direction of the arrow
Answers
Answer:
a
Explanation:
because the arrow is pointing at the left
This road sign means no turns in the direction of the arrow are allowed. The correct option is a.
No turns are allowed in the direction that the direction arrow points, according to the road sign with a line through it. This sign serves as a clear visual communication to motorists informing them that turning in the direction indicated by the sign is not permitted. To maintain traffic flow, safety and adherence to traffic laws, it is crucial to obey this sign.
Ignoring this sign and turning in the opposite direction of where it points can result in collisions, impede the smooth flow of traffic and possibly even violate the law. To ensure a smooth and safe driving experience, it is crucial for drivers to pay attention to road signs and heed their instructions.
learn more about road sign here
brainly.com/question/25663996
#SPJ2
A customer was shopping at the handbag counter of the defendant’s store. She did not make any purchase and left the store. When she was a few feet away from the store, a store employee tapped her lightly on the shoulder to attract her attention and asked her if she had made any purchases. When she inquired why, he asked, "what about the bag in your hand?" the customer said it belonged to her, and she opened it to show by its contents that it was not a new bag. The employee gave the customer a dirty look and went back in to the store. The customer then sued the store for false imprisonment. Was the store liable?
Answers
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
False imprisonment occurs when a person is detained without justifiable reason. The customer mentioned in the text above was not arrested, neither the employee nor the store owner used force to force her to open the bag. Even though the employee did not look at the customer with courtesy, he did not arrest her, did not use force against her or prevent her from continuing on her way, which indicates that there was no action that could indicate that the employee or the store promoted false imprisonment.
The law of which country provided the roots for U.S. law?
Answers
Answer:
Background. At both the federal and state levels, the law of the United States was mainly derived from the common law system of English law, which was in force at the time of the Revolutionary War. However, U.S. law has diverged greatly from its English ancestor both in terms of substance and procedure.
How might social stability be the product of competition and conflict?
Answers
Social stability can be the product of competition and conflict as these forces drive societies to adapt, change, and evolve. Competition, whether between individuals or groups, can motivate innovation, resource allocation, and the development of more effective social structures. By competing for resources and influence, society members strive to improve their positions, ultimately leading to advancements and growth.
Conflict, on the other hand, can challenge the status quo and force societies to confront issues and disparities. Through conflict resolution, societies can develop new rules, norms, and institutions that help maintain stability in the long run. Conflict can also create opportunities for collaboration and compromise, as opposing factions work together to find common ground. Moreover, both competition and conflict can facilitate social cohesion by fostering a sense of unity among members. As individuals and groups work together to overcome challenges, they develop shared goals and values, promoting stability within the society. social stability may arise from competition and conflict as these forces drive innovation, resource allocation, and the establishment of effective social structures. Additionally, conflict resolution and collaboration can promote cohesion, ensuring that society remains stable despite ongoing challenges. Overall, competition and conflict contribute to the dynamic process of maintaining and enhancing social stability.
to know about social stability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30285492
#SPJ11
the legal system of the united states is based primarily on the french legal system.
a. true b. false
Answers
False. The legal system of the United States is based primarily on the English legal system.
The legal system of the United States is based primarily on the English legal system. The Constitution of the United States established a federal system of government, under which the United States is a federal republic. The American legal system is therefore a federal system, under which the laws of the federal government apply to the entire country, while the laws of each state apply only to that state. The federal courts and the state courts are separate and distinct systems, although they may sometimes hear cases that involve both federal and state law. The legal system of the United States is based on common law, which is the system of law that developed in England from the eleventh century onwards. Common law is based on precedent, which means that judges are bound by the decisions of previous judges in similar cases. The common law also emphasizes the role of the jury in determining guilt or innocence, and in determining damages in civil cases.
Learn more about the English legal system: https://brainly.com/question/32221418
#SPJ11
Joe files a lawsuit against Bob. Bob is served with a copy of the complaint. Bob puts the complaint in a drawer and ignores it for six months. Which of the following is the most likely outcome?
Options:
Bob will receive an automatic 30-day extension
Joe's case is dismissed
A bench arrest warrant is issued against Bob
A default judgment is entered against Bob
Answers
The most likely outcome in this scenario is that a default judgment is entered against Bob.
In this situation, a default judgement against Bob is the most likely result. Bob might be subject to a default judgement if he doesn't answer to the complaint within the court's designated time frame. This implies that without providing Bob a chance to respond, the court will find in favour of Joe based on the claims made in the complaint. Bob has effectively renounced his right to challenge the case by ignoring it and doing nothing, and the court will view this as an admission of the claims made in the complaint. Therefore, it is likely that Bob will be subject to a default judgement.
For such more question on Bob:
brainly.com/question/3706066
#SPJ4
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answers
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
2. Why do you think mandatory minimum punishment sentencing dont have the deterrent
effect that they were created to prove?
Answers
Answer:
Minimum sentencing does not have the deterrent effect it was created to have because, it is punishing individuals on a set scale and not on the circumstances of the case.
Explanation:
Siena and Kendall retirement savings contribution credit
Answers
Amounts of 50%, 20%, or 10% of your retirement plan contributions are eligible for the retirement savings contribution credit. Your Adjusted Gross Income determines how much you will pay. There is a $2,000 credit limit.
How can I cancel my retirement savings contribution credit?The Saver's Credit cannot be taken away if you qualify for it. TurboTax produces Form 8880, Credit for Qualified Retirement Savings Contributions.
What is the credit's maximum amount for retirement saving contributions?The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 if married filing jointly), with the maximum donation amount that may qualify for the credit being $2,000 ($4,000 if married filing jointly). To determine your credit, use the chart below.
To know more about retirement visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30453307
#SPJ1
The law of criminal justice procedure limits police discretion with requirements for
searches and seizure and interrogations.
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
the rule of law is when a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. (true or false)
Answers
The rule of law refers to the principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly and consistently applied and enforced. given statement is true.
It means that a society enforces property rights, contracts, and other rules according to an established and uniform set of laws instead of arbitrary decisions. This concept is central to the functioning of a democratic society and is essential for protecting individual rights and promoting social and economic stability.
For such more question on federal law
https://brainly.com/question/30710747
#SPJ4
how did the roberts court rule in favor of business
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In the eight years since Chief Justice Roberts joined the court, it has allowed corporations to spend freely in elections in the Citizens United case, has shielded them from class actions and human rights suits, and has made arbitration the favored way to resolve many disputes.
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answers
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
Answers
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
What is the difference between public policy and private action? Provide one example of each as it relates to health care, education, or any other social issue.
Answers
Answer:
Public policies are primarily involuntary and compulsory actions while private actions are voluntary.
Explanation:
The difference between a public policy and private action is that public policies are primarily involuntary and compulsory actions while private actions are voluntary.
As we know public policies are made by the government, therefore, they are mandatory actions that every organization, individuals, firms, etc. should adhere to. On the other hand, private actions pertain only to those group of interested organization, individuals, firms, etc.
For example, when a public policy that establishes that every private enterprise must provide medical reimbursement to its employees, it becomes mandatory for all private enterprise to adhere to it.
However, in case of a private action, there are no such collective establishments/rules that every organization, individuals, firms, etc.must adhere. Every action undertaken by a private party are voluntary and only those interested follow them.
What is a criticism of the two-party system?
It impacts election outcomes by pulling voters from another candidate.
It favors liberal over conservative ideologies.
It is too polarizing and limits alternative viewpoints.
It leads to spoiler candidates.
Answers
Correct option is C.
The main criticism of the two-party system is that " It is too polarizing and limits alternative viewpoints."
However, two-party system have been criticized for ignoring alternative views and putting a damper on debate within a nation. It simply partisan appeals to the population.
In conclusion, A two-party system is one in which two main political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections at all levels of government, and as a result two parties can hold the majority of elected positions.
To know more about two-party system, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16917042
what did the war cost in terms of the number of civilian deaths
Answers
The War cost in terms of the number of civilian deaths Around 11 million more. There are millions of people killed in world wars. Even after those wars the fights between States didn't stop and led to huge losses of human resources.
In World War 2 the deaths are between 3.5 crores to 60 crores. Each country lost thousands of its civilians and most of the loss is for their families who have nothing in the future.
In the USA there were 2.9 lakh people died during the war. Even after the missiles and a nuclear attack at Hiroshima and Nagasaki people still suffer from diseases after so many decades of war.
The war happened between the axis and allied countries. The World war had affected the common people to an extent that decreased the economic conditions, and no benefit is provided to the citizens.
To know more about the war
brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ4
Hasan is missing his normal equipment but needs to transport a bullet from the crime. In an attempt to protect the bullet, which process would be BEST to use?
fold it in a clean piece of paper
put it in a pocket
wrap it in a towel
wrap it in plastic wrap
Answers
The best process for Hassan to use to transport the bullet from the crime would be to D. Wrap it in plastic wrap.
Why should Hassan wrap the bullet ?Wrapping the bullet in plastic wrap would be the best option to protect it from contamination, as it provides a barrier from any external substances that could compromise the integrity of the evidence.
Hassan would therefore be best protected from evidence tampering if he wrapped the bullet in a plastic bag and then transported it to his police department or other relevant evident analysis unit.
Find out more on preserving evidence at https://brainly.com/question/24667539
#SPJ1
A criminal has just been convicted of vehicular manslaughter and cocaine possession. She has a previous DUI conviction from two years ago. She is also the sole provider for her two children, ages 4 and 6, but has had difficulty maintaining a job for more than a few months at a time in the past five years.
Determine which sentencing goal or philosophy you would use in this case.
Why is the goal or philosophy you chose the best approach?
Explain your sentence choice.
On what factors should judges rely when sentencing offenders? How does discretion come into play with sentencing?
Answers
The best approach would depend on the circumstances of the case, the offender's background, and the specific goals of the justice system. In some cases, a combination of these goals may be appropriate.
What are sentencing goalThere are several sentencing goals and philosophies, including retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation.
Retribution aims to punish offenders proportionally to the harm they caused, deterrence aims to discourage others from committing similar offenses, rehabilitation aims to reform offenders and prevent future crimes, and incapacitation aims to remove dangerous offenders from society.
Factors that judges may rely on when sentencing offenders include the severity of the offense, the offender's criminal history, the impact of the offense on victims and society, the offender's remorse and willingness to accept responsibility, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Discretion plays a significant role in the sentencing process. Judges have the discretion to consider all relevant factors and to choose an appropriate sentence within the legal guidelines. This discretion allows judges to tailor sentences to fit the specific circumstances of each case and to balance competing goals, such as punishment and rehabilitation.
Learn more about philosophy at
https://brainly.com/question/9949
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of a statutory law? A. IRS regulatory rules and procedures B. A presidential executive order C. A court ruling overturning part of a law D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
Answers
Answer:
D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is best example of statutory law.
Statutory instruments that have been authorized by a legislator, either a state or federal government, are known as statutory laws.
Regulations may mandate particular acts, ban them, serve as statements of purpose, or specify how the government will behave in specific situations.
So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/19769037?referrer=searchResults
Alison and Brent are financing their house purchase of $232,500 with an FHA loan. Their credit score qualifies them for the minimum down payment. What do they need to put down?
Answers
Alison and Brent are financing their house purchase of $232,500 with an FHA loan. Their credit score qualifies them for the minimum down payment, they would have to pay in $8,137.50.
What is meant by minimum down payment?The financial contribution that a borrower is required to make when they buy a property is known as the minimum down payment. The minimum down payment needed for a conventional loan is typically 20%, and the minimum down payment needed for an FHA loan is 3.5%.
However, many mortgage loans will require such a minimum, and the actual amount necessary varies by the lending type.
The calculation is $232,500 * 3.5%
= $232,500 * 0.035
= $8,137.50.
Read more on loan here:https://brainly.com/question/26913200
#SPJ1
Murders are usually committed by strangers.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
They usually happen randomly
Thomas, an attorney, enters into a contract of representation with Cybil to represent her in a probate matter. Which body of law applies to this contract?
Answers
Answer:
The body of law that applies to the contract between Thomas, an attorney, and Cybil for representation in a probate matter is contract law. This is because the contract creates a legal obligation between the two parties, and contract law governs the formation, interpretation, and enforcement of contracts.
White Chocolate Chunk Pecan Cookies
INGREDIENTS
1 1/4 cups all-purpose flour
1/2 cup unsalted butter
1/2 teaspoon baking powder
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/2 cup white sugar
1/4 cup packed brown sugar
1 egg
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
1/2 cup chopped white chocolate
1/3 cup chopped pecans
DIRECTIONS
Blend sugar and butter together until smooth and creamy. Add the egg and vanilla; blend well.
Sift together the flour, salt, and baking powder; combine these ingredients with the creamed mixture. Add chopped white chocolate and nuts.
Spoon dough out onto a cookie sheet. Bake at 375 degrees F (190 degrees C) for about 5 to 10 minutes, or until golden brown on the bottom. Let cool slightly on the cookie sheet before removing, or they'll break.
What was the author's purpose for writing this passage?
A.
to inform readers of the proper way to eat cookies
B.
to entertain readers with a tale of two cookies
C.
to persuade readers that white chocolate is better
D.
to provide instructions on how to bake cookies