Describe the content of the letter that had the greatest emotional effect on you. What was it about this letter that made you react respond the way you did emotionally, physically, pychologically. ​

Caesar will be brought to the capital by Decius by flattery and uplift, making him more likely to accompany him. Caesar is persuaded to visit the Capitol by Decius.

He admits to Caesar that he misread Calpurnia's dream. The senate intends to crown him, but they may change their minds, the speaker also informs him. Caesar's honor is also attacked by Decius, who warns him that the senators will perceive him as a coward.

According to Decius Brutus, it was a fortunate dream. He predicts a new era for both Rome and the Roman people. Great men will assemble around Caesar, smearing his blood on their handkerchiefs. He will honor distinguished men, and everything he is associated with will be treated with the utmost respect.

Learn more about Caesar at:

brainly.com/question/2366443

#SPJ4

Answer:

those things that harvest cotton by themselves

Explanation:

they look like tractors and were able to harvest more cotton faster

Competition in America is about price, selection, and service. it benefits consumers by keeping prices low and the quality and choice of goods and services high. Competition makes our economy work. By enforcing antitrust laws, the Federal trade Commission helps to ensure that our markets are open and free.

Answer: The concept of Manifest Destiny was used to motivate and justify U.S territorial expansion by using the belief that God wanted America to expand to the Pacific Ocean which is the basis of the idea of Manifest Destiny.

Explanation:

During World War I, the government raised money for the war effort by selling liberty bonds.

War bonds were made available to both retail and wholesale investors during World War I (WW1) with the aim of obtaining enough money to pay the governments' increasing military expenses. Strong promotional efforts were made to pique the nation's feeling of patriotism.

A Liberty Bond is a debt obligation that was issued by the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Department of Treasury. It was a war bond, also referred to as a "Liberty Loan," that was issued in four instalments between 1917 and 1918 to pay for the United States' involvement in World War I as well as the Allied war effort in Europe.

To learn more about World War I and liberty bonds, here

https://brainly.com/question/11513902

#SPJ4

Answer:

D) He wanted to restructure the government to make it more efficient and humane.

Explanation:

In 1988, Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev introduced a series of reforms designed to give new freedoms to the people, including greater freedom of speech. The press also became far less controlled, and thousands of political prisoners and many dissidents were released.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The railroads were used the transport crops and raw material.

B, is false, since it was not a primary reason.

C, is false, since the Civil War was decades later

D, is false, since Native Americans were forced to walk

Answer:

B and D

Explanation:

He held absolute authority and power over all member of the family. He also required complete respect for his ruling position as head of the household.

Hope we helped you out :D

Answer:

B, maybe C

Explanation:

If you read up on the Reconstruction, which I have done a good amount of study on, African American's were given rights and liberties, but they were not upheld or were considered null or void to many southerns.

I hope this helps, and please tell me If I am wrong! Thanks and BRAINLIEST PLEASE!

Answer:

Explanation:

the answer is C

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

The United States should require all of its citizens to vote. Doing so will push back against voter suppression and tear down barriers to participation because the best way to protect the right to vote is to underscore that it is also a civic duty

The income inequality gap in the United States has been steadily growing since the late 1970s, with the top 5 percent of earners seeing a significant increase in their income. This trend has been particularly noticeable since the 1990s and has continued to accelerate into the present day.

The causes of this income gap are complex and multifaceted, but one major contributing factor is the increasing importance of technology and globalization in the modern economy. As these forces continue to shape the labor market and the economy as a whole, it is likely that income inequality will continue to be a major challenge facing policymakers and society as a whole. In order to address this issue, it will be important to implement policies and programs that support the bottom 20 percent of earners and ensure that they have access to the education and training they need to compete in the modern economy.
Between 1979 and 2009, income inequality in the United States increased significantly. During this period, the top 5 percent of earners saw their income grow by more than 50 percent, when adjusted for inflation. In contrast, the bottom 20 percent experienced stagnant or minimal growth in their income. This disparity highlights the widening income gap and economic divide within the country. Various factors contributed to this trend, including changes in labor markets, globalization, and shifts in government policies. To address this issue, policymakers should consider implementing progressive tax reforms, strengthening social safety nets, and promoting access to quality education and job training opportunities for all citizens.

To know more about inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

Answer: The colony would not have thrived without the Powhatan tribe.

Explanation: The Powhatan tribe, led by Chief Powhatan (Wahunsenaca), played a crucial role in the survival of the Jamestown colony. They provided the struggling settlers with food, taught them how to cultivate crops like corn, squash, and beans, and helped them navigate the unfamiliar terrain.

The Powhatan tribe also traded with the colonists, exchanging goods such as furs and pottery. Their assistance was essential in helping the colony overcome initial challenges and establish a foothold in the New World.

One of the most famous Powhatan Native Americans was Pocahontas, who was the daughter of Chief Powhatan.  She was also credited for releasing the Powhatan Native Americans prisoners from the English.  

Learn more about Jamestown here: https://brainly.com/question/28767414.

Answer: Europe, Asia, and Africa

Explanation:

Answer:

They were ineffective until they were paired with child-labor laws.

Explanation:

If Abraham Lincoln had ordered Major Anderson to turn over Fort Sumter to the Confederacy, it would have had significant implications for the course of history. Here are a few ways in which history might have been changed:

Avoiding the American Civil War: The attack on Fort Sumter is widely regarded as the event that triggered the American Civil War. If Fort Sumter had been handed over peacefully, it might have diffused tensions between the North and the South temporarily, potentially avoiding the full-scale conflict.

Recognition of Confederate Independence: By turning over Fort Sumter, Lincoln would have implicitly acknowledged the legitimacy of the Confederacy. This act could have led to diplomatic recognition of the Confederate States of America by foreign nations, potentially including Great Britain and France.

Preservation of the Union: Lincoln's refusal to surrender Fort Sumter demonstrated his commitment to preserving the Union and upholding federal authority. If he had ordered its handover, it would have undermined his position and weakened the Union's resolve.

Potential Compromise and Negotiations: Handing over Fort Sumter might have created an opportunity for negotiations and compromises between the North and the South.

Different Emancipation Timeline: The abolition of slavery was a central objective for President Lincoln, but if Fort Sumter had been handed over, it would have likely prolonged the institution of slavery in the Confederate states.

To know about Abraham Lincoln

brainly.com/question/31691123

#SPJ4

Answer:

Russian the psoriatic union (aka its related to hitler thing)

zoom in on the picture and you will see symbols

Korea's relationship with China under the Qing Dynasty was characterized by tributary relations, cultural exchange, and diplomatic interactions.

As a tributary state, Korea, specifically the Joseon Dynasty, recognized the authority of the Qing Dynasty and sent tribute missions to China regularly. In return, the Qing Dynasty provided protection and diplomatic support to Korea.

Culturally, Korea was heavily influenced by Chinese Confucianism, and the Korean elite class adopted many aspects of Chinese culture, including language, literature, and art. Despite the political subordination, Korean scholars and officials maintained regular exchanges with their Chinese counterparts, leading to a fruitful cultural and intellectual exchange.

In the late 19th century, however, Korea began to assert its independence as it was exposed to Western influences and sought to modernize. This led to tensions between Korea and the Qing Dynasty, culminating in the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895).

Ultimately, the Qing Dynasty's defeat by Japan marked the end of Korea's tributary relationship with China and the beginning of Japanese colonial rule over Korea.

In summary, during the Qing Dynasty, Korea had a tributary relationship with China, which fostered cultural exchange and diplomatic support. However, Korea's attempts to modernize and assert independence led to tensions and the eventual end of this relationship.

To know more about Qing Dynasty, visit https://brainly.com/question/32135336

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

b or c

Explanation:

Answer:

The Government of Ancient Greece

Explanation:

The United States Government was most influenced by the government of Ancient Greece.

In the spring of 1970, over 350 colleges and universities witnessed student strikes, and troops occupied twenty-one campuses as a protest against the Vietnam War.

During this period, student strikes erupted on campuses across the United States, with students expressing their opposition to the Vietnam War. The strikes were a way for students to voice their discontent with the government's policies and actions regarding the war. Additionally, troops were deployed to occupy twenty-one campuses, further escalating the tension between students and authorities. The student strikes and campus occupations were a significant part of the broader anti-war movement during the Vietnam War era. Students believed that their actions would draw attention to the war and put pressure on the government to end it. These protests were often met with resistance from both local authorities and the federal government. Overall, the events of the spring of 1970 demonstrated the depth of anti-war sentiment among students and highlighted the growing opposition to the Vietnam War within the American society.

To know more about anti-war  visit:

brainly.com/question/12112146

#SPJ11

Answer: d

Explanation: The enlightment was about new ways of thinking

Answer:

D)  it led thinkers to question traditional ideas.

Explanation:

The revolution was all about change and the development of society. People had ideas and were making discoveries.  

During President Reagan's second term in office, the United States expressed concerns about Marxist groups potentially taking over certain countries or regions.

In conclusion, during President Reagan's second term, the United States was apprehensive about the potential spread of Marxist ideologies in Central America, particularly in Nicaragua, leading to its support for anti-Sandinista forces as part of the broader effort to counter communist influence globally.

For more questions on President Reagan:

https://brainly.com/question/4784629

#SPJ8

Answer:

he did not completely succeed in changing Spanish views on colonization

Explanation:

Amerigo Vespucci was the describe the America, but the America was founded by Cristofer Columbus

Answer:

Explanation:

While under the Common Core Standards Cannibals All! qualifies as an informational text, it is first and foremost a passionately argued piece of persuasive writing. Published in Richmond, Virginia, in 1857, and aimed at both Northern and Southern readers, it sought to claim for the South the moral high ground in the increasingly fierce national debate over slavery. Fitzhugh maintained that both free labor, as practiced among industrial workers in the North and Great Britain, and slavery, as practiced in the American South, exploited workers. However, because slave masters owned their workers, they took better care of them than capitalists who merely rented theirs.

To help students grasp Fitzhugh’s argument, you might ask two questions: How many would wash a rental car? How many wash their own or pay to have it done?

To prepare students to judge Fitzhugh’s argument, assign three essays in Freedom’s Story from the National Humanities Center’s TeacherServe®: “The Varieties of Slave Labor”, “How Slavery Affected African American Families”, and “Slave Resistance”. (These essays are designed for teachers, but they are useful to students. You might divide the class into three groups and assign each an essay, then have each group respond to Fitzhugh in the light of their reading.) From these essays a series of questions emerges. How different in their response to the demand to make a profit were Southern plantations from Northern factories? How free were people whose family lives could be disrupted at the whim of a master? If the slave system was so good for slaves, why did they spend considerable time and energy trying to undermine and escape it?

Encourage students to challenge Fitzhugh’s definition of freedom. Have them come at it inductively. Why, according to Fitzhugh, are capitalists and slaves free? Why are slaveowners and laborers not free? Fitzhugh sees humans solely as economic entities. His definition of freedom is based entirely on the exchange of labor for reward. While it does include a sense of one person’s responsibility to another, that responsibility is based on the extent of one’s financial investment in the other person. Essentially, he thinks a person is free to the extent that he or she is not responsible for the economic well-being of others and to the extent that one’s economic needs are addressed by the efforts of others. Is that an adequate basis for a moral order? Does Fitzhugh’s idea of freedom have room for such concepts as equality, personal choice, or mobility?

Answer: The Texas Revolution had many effects. To the Texans it meant a great deal of freedom, and independence. But to the Mexicans it meant a great loss of land, loss of money, a defeat of a powerful leader, the death of many people, and the loss of people in the army.

Answer:

Texas's independence from Mexico and the founding of the Republic of Texas

Explanation:

im from Texas

Over demand in relation to supply and OPEC production cuts were the reason for the spike in oil prices during the 2000s

Two of the reasons for the spike in oil prices during the 2000s were:

Over demand in relation to supply: The demand for oil increased rapidly, driven by factors such as economic growth, particularly in emerging economies such as China and India. However, the supply of oil struggled to keep up with this growing demand, leading to higher prices.

OPEC production cuts: The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is a cartel of oil-producing countries that controls a significant portion of the world's oil supply. In the 2000s, OPEC reduced its production of oil, which further tightened the market and contributed to higher prices.

The statement "Americans using less gas" is not a reason for the spike in oil prices. In fact, the opposite is true, as higher oil prices often lead to increased consumption. The statement "too much refined oil decreased" is also not a reason for the spike in oil prices.

For more such questions on supply

https://brainly.com/question/13624851

#SPJ4

Answer:overdemand in relation to supply

decreased OPEC production of oil

Explanation:

I am Big Oil

Answer:

The agricultural adjustment administration

Answer:

i have the answer key to that here it is *link not available*

Explanation:

In order to prevent a future military war, Thomas Jefferson sent James Monroe to France in 1803 to work with Robert R. Livingston to purchase some portion of the land from the authority of Napoleon.

and France wanted to sell because Napoleon Bonaparte needed the money for the Great French War, he decided to sell the property. As a result of the re-entry of the British into the conflict as well as the fact that France was losing the Haitian Revolution, they were unable to protect Louisiana.

Generally, Thomas Jefferson was an American politician, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, and Founding Father who served as the third President of the United States from 1801 through 1809. Jefferson's presidency spanned the years 1801 through 1809. Before that, he served as John Adams's second Vice President and as George Washington's first Secretary of State in the United States.

In conclusion, Napoleon Bonaparte decided to sell the property because he needed the money for the Great French War, which caused France to want to sell the territory.

Read more about Thomas Jefferson

https://brainly.com/question/14242343

#SPJ1