Courts of Appeal have appellate authority in a few other situations that are outlined by statute as well as when superior courts have original jurisdiction.
What Does the U.S. Court of Appeals have original jurisdiction?Courts of Appeal have appellate authority in a few other situations that are outlined by statute as well as when superior courts have original jurisdiction. In habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, and prohibition actions, they have original jurisdiction, just like the Supreme Court (Cal. Const., art. VI, 10).A three-judge panel decides each case. If a panel's decision meets specific publishing requirements, the panel's "opinions" are published in the California Appellate Reports. According to the California Constitution's Article VI, Section 14, and Rule 8.1105(c) of the California Rules of Court, an opinion is generally published when it creates a new legal principle, addresses a legal matter of ongoing public interest, critiques an existing legal principle, or significantly advances legal scholarship.To Learn more About original jurisdiction refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/342388
#SPJ4
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
A statement that is presumed by law to be harmful to the person to whom it was directed and therefore requires no proof of harm or injury is:A. SlanderB. Defamation per seC. LibelD. Absolute privilege
Answer:
B. defamation per se
Explanation:
Defamation per se is spoken defamation.
section 1981 of the civil rights act of 1866 granted individuals the _____.
Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 granted individuals the right to make and enforce contracts without regard to race.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was passed by Congress to provide legal protection to African Americans, who had been freed from slavery but still faced discrimination and prejudice. Section 1981 was one of the most important provisions of the Act, as it prohibited discrimination in the making and enforcing of contracts on the basis of race. This meant that African Americans had the same legal rights as white Americans to enter into contracts for employment, housing, and other goods and services. Section 1981 remains an important tool in the fight against discrimination and has been used in a variety of cases to protect the rights of minorities.
To learn more about Civil Rights Act of 1866, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/639788
#SPJ11
Niki donated 4 5/8 pounds of beans to the food drive and Annie donated 3 2/3 pounds of beans to the food drive. Together, how much food did they donate?
Answer: 8⁷/₂₄ pounds of beans.
Explanation:
First convert both fractions to improper fractions.
4 ⁵/₈ = 37/8
3²/₃ = 11/3
Find the lowest common multiple of 3 and 8 which is 24.
Use 24 as the denominator and add the fractions by multiplying the numerator by the result you get from dividing 24 by the denominator:
\(= \frac{111 + 88}{24} \\\\= \frac{199}{24} \\\\= 8\frac{7}{24} pounds of beans\)
pwease pick me as brainliset :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Joe a citizen of France, request a copy of an existing report from the security exchange commission’s detailing the effects of derivative financial Products and their potential effects on the US stock market. Joe does not own any derivative financial products, nor does he have any investment accounts whatsoever. The SEC denies joes request on this basis as well as not being AUS citizen. Has the S EC committed any violation of the law? How so?
The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal administrative agency tasked with monitoring markets, enforcing securities laws, and developing new regulations.
There have been no legal violations by the SEC. Joe must be a US citizen or a foreigner with a valid visa in order to see a study from the Security Exchange Commission that discusses the implications of derivative financial products and their possible effects on the US stock market. Joe, a French national, asked the Securities and Exchange Commission for a copy of a report that discussed the implications of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market. Joe has no investment accounts of any kind and does not hold any derivative financial instruments. Due to this and the fact that Joe is not a US citizen, the SEC rejects his request. However, the SEC hasn't broken the law in any way. Any US citizen or foreign national with a valid visa is allowed to request a copy of any current reports from the SEC, according the law. Joe, however, is unable to view the SEC's study on the impact of derivative financial products and their possible impact on the US stock market since he is not a US citizen.
To know more about Security Exchange Commission (SEC):
https://brainly.com/question/9089676
#SPJ11
Con la evolución del derecho romano y con la expedición del cerebro edicto de Antonio caracalla, se extinguió la clasificación del hombres libres y esclavos, en pro de fortalecer el imperio, el fisco, ¿esto es falso o verdadero?
Answer: Verdadero
Explanation:
En el año 338 a.C., el Emperador Caracalla pone fin a la institución de la esclavitud, eliminando la distinción entre hombres libres y esclavos. Este evento no solo aporta una mayor fuerza integradora al creciente imperio, sino que además permite una mayor recaudación de fondos a través de los impuestos que los esclavos liberados deben comenzar a pagar, y que genera un beneficio fiscal para el emperador.
Antes de eso, la esclavitud había sido una institución naturalizada en el Imperio Romano, existiendo personas que nacían como esclavos, y otras que obtenían esa condición por definiciones del derecho positivo de la época.
Question o o
Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases because they
can:
O A. force the government to provide defendants with a lawyer.
• B. allow a judge to decide on a verdict without a jury.
• C. prevent the police from getting search warrants.
O D. result in lighter penalties than being found guilty.
SURMIT
Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases because they can force the government to provide defendants with a lawyer. Hence, option A is correct.
Why is plea bargaining beneficial to the defendant?Because he receives a shorter punishment for admitting to a lesser offense, the defendant may frequently benefit from the plea negotiation process. The public trial and its accompanying psychological suffering are spared the defendant, his family, and the victim.
Plea bargaining is frequently used for pragmatic purposes. Defendants can escape the time and expense of representing themselves in court, the possibility of receiving a heavier sentence, and the potential attention a trial could bring.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more information about plea bargaining beneficial to the defendant, click here
https://brainly.com/question/20125776
#SPJ9
Once issued, warrants never expire?
True
False
Answer:
true
hope this helps :)
Explanation:
stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Answer: very expensive store
Explanation:
Arthur Fairchild is accused of breaking into a top secret military installation and tampering with the records. Fairchild claims that at the time of the break-in he was with some friends smoking marijuana. Because that is against the law, his friends do not want to testify on his behalf. Will they have to?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it is still against the law to smoke marijuana so they will have to testify anyway
The doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim is called
Answer:
Res judicata
Explanation:
Res judicata is a Latin word which means matter decided. It is a situation in which an apex court has ruled over a case and there is no more room for any appeal or retrial of any form.
The judgement is usually final with both parties having no option than to accept it.
Res judicata is also known as the doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim.
Is it legal for a shooter to catch his/her own shot off of the rebounder/frame?.
Yes, it is legal for a shooter to catch his/her own shot off of the rebounder/frame if they follow the rules of the game and meet the requirements for the use of a rebounder.
A rebounder is a device used in basketball to help players improve their shooting skills. It is a rectangular frame with a net or bungee cords attached to it, which returns the ball back to the player after it is shot.
A rebounder is a training device that helps basketball player improve their rebounding skills. A basketball player has to be able to catch the ball after it has bounced off the rim or backboard.
A rebounder is used to simulate these situations in practice. Rebounders are available in different sizes and styles to suit different players’ needs and preferences.
They can be used for solo practice or team training sessions. A rebounder is a valuable tool for basketball players who want to improve their skills.
Learn more about rebounder from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/21272179
#SPJ11
Buying insurance and investing for the future requires spending less in the present. Why is this a hard choice for many people? Would it be a hard choice for you?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a very hard choice for many people because they have been raised in a consumer culture. For these individuals, happiness is buying the latest technology, clothing, or other accessories that is trending. They also want to live life to the fullest that they can afford. It all depends on your mentality towards what is happiness to you. For me personally, It was like this when I was younger but not anymore. When I turned 23 and found out what was possible through compound interest investing and other forms of investments, it became a no brainer to invest all I could at a younger age to have the peace of mind that comes with financial freedom later in life.
Can people get divorced without hiring an attorney.
2. Explain how juvenile courts developed?
Answer:
by to many issues
Explanation:
when the framers of the u.s. constitution guaranteed freedom of the press, one of the things they had in mind was the ability of the news media to serve as a those in positions of power.
When the framers of the US constitution guaranteed freedom of the press, one of the things they had in mind was the ability of the news media to serve as a watchdog over those in positions of power.
The essential tenet of freedom of the press or free media is that expression and communication through a variety of media, including electronic and written media, especially published information, should be seen as a right to be freely practiced. Such freedom denotes the lack of intervention from a power-hungry state; its conservation may be attempted through some kind of constitution or other forms of security and legal protection.
A democracy where the people are the government's ultimate arbiters depends on freedom of the press, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment. A free press serves as just a watchdog that really can look into and report on misconduct by the government.
Learn more about freedom of the press here:
https://brainly.com/question/9537637
#SPJ4
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
For each of the following identify which section, sections and subsections apply to the following
situations:
1. You are told by the police during a peaceful demonstration that you must disperse.
2. You have been detained but have not been informed of any charges.
3. Your company, which is a private corporation, has asked to refrain from publishing certain
commentary on a blog that it argues damages the company’s reputation. You suggest that
under s. 2(b) of the Charter you have freedom of expression. What section of the Charter might
they counter with?
4. Police come to your door and ask to enter. You can refuse based on what section or sections of
the Charter.
5. You argue that under s. 2(b) of the Charter you have the right to advertise cigarettes in your
store window contrary to the Federal Tobacco Act. What contrary position might the
government take.
6. You have been accused of a crime and have been awaiting trial for 7 months. What Charter
issues might your lawyer use to seek your release.
7. The Provincial Government is intending putting into effect legislation that may be contrary to
the Charter. Can they do this? What section of the Charter allows them to contemplate such
Legislation.
8. Your employer has found out that in the evenings you have been attending regular meetings with
a group whose political values your employer finds offensive. Your employer has asked you not
attend any further meeting even on your own time. Which charter sections might this request
offend?
1. Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms may apply to the situation where the police tell you to disperse during a peaceful demonstration.
Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees freedom of expression, which includes the right to peaceful assembly and protest. In the given situation, where the police instruct you to disperse during a peaceful demonstration, Section 2(b) would be relevant as it protects your right to express your opinions and engage in peaceful protests.
Learn more about Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
https://brainly.com/question/32752828
#SPJ11
Class or individual Evidence?
Evidence Example: A note was found at a crime scene. A notepad with a similar type of paper was found in the desk of a suspect. Is the note be individual or
class evidence to the pad of paper?
A) class evidence
B) individual evidence
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Individual characteristics can be identified as Individual characteristics can be identified as
having originated with a particular person or having originated with a particular person or
source
hope this helps
Which law provides legal recourse to people who purchase animals from pet dealers which are later found to have a disease or defect?.
The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.
This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.
A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.
Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645
#SPJ4
What legal issues are associated with data mining?
Legal issues associated with data mining include privacy concerns, data protection, and potential misuse of personal information.
What are some legal concerns related to data mining?Data mining involves the extraction and analysis of large sets of data to identify patterns, trends, and correlations. While it offers valuable insights and benefits in various fields, it also raises legal concerns. One significant issue is privacy. Data mining often involves the collection and analysis of personal information, which can infringe on individuals' privacy rights.
Laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) aim to protect individuals' personal data and require organizations to obtain proper consent and handle data responsibly. Another concern is the potential misuse of data. If not properly regulated, data mining can lead to discrimination, profiling, or unauthorized access to sensitive information. Ensuring compliance with relevant laws and ethical guidelines is crucial to mitigate these risks and protect individuals' rights. Data mining practices must align with legal requirements and prioritize the safeguarding of privacy and data protection.
Learn more about Data mining
brainly.com/question/2596411
#SPJ11
ANSWER QUICK
How do Amendments 9 and 10 limit the power of the federal government?
Explanation/answer:
9th:
gives a ton of freedom to the people basically saying that they have the freedom to retain the rights even though they were not specifically discussed in the bill of rights, this limits the power of the government because it gives the people more power
10th:
Lets the states impose their own laws special to those states. having its own law would let the state become nearly as powerful as the federal government, so that takes away power from the federal government.
Honestly, it's good that the federal government doesn't have all the power otherwise it would be kinda like a dictatorship.
Reasons a lawyer would choose to work as in-house counsel instead of for a law firm include _____. (select all that apply.)
to specialize in an industry
to avoid having to become partner
to have more of an impact
to represent a single client
Reasons a lawyer would choose to work as in-house counsel instead of for a law firm include to specialize in an industry, to have more of an impact, and to represent a single client.
In-house counsel refers to attorneys who work within a corporation or organization rather than for a law firm that serves outside clients. The job description of an in-house counsel is usually varied and broad. Depending on the size of the organization, they may be responsible for anything from intellectual property disputes to contract negotiations, labor disputes to regulatory compliance.
In-house counsel may choose to work for a particular organization because it is a business that is close to their hearts. Perhaps they previously worked in the industry or feel a particular affinity for the organization's goals and values. A major factor for lawyers who choose to work as in-house counsel is that they have a more significant impact on their company's operations than those who work in private practice. Rather than offering advice to a range of clients, they have the opportunity to engage in a direct partnership with a single client. It gives them the chance to get more deeply engaged in the company's strategic objectives and establish long-term relationships with their clients.
Learn more about Lawyer
https://brainly.com/question/33640413
#SPJ11
According to the reading, what were the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche? Check all that apply. to promote the Christian religion to celebrate the holiday to encourage the celebration of Christmas to show how the holiday started to act as a place for prayer
Answer:
to celebrate the holiday
to show how the holiday started
Explanation:
This is the reading
The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.
—Chief Justice Warren Burger,
Opinion of the Court,
Lynch v. Donnelly
1984
From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.
Answer:
To celebrate the holiday
To show how the holiday started
Explanation:
67. state laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about:
Yes, state laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about the condition of a property. In some states, buyers are entitled to certain disclosures from the seller that provide information on the condition of the property.
In other states, buyers may not be entitled to any disclosures or may be entitled to less information than in other states.
State laws differ on whether a buyer is entitled to know about various aspects of the property they are purchasing. This can include information about the condition of the property, any potential hazards, and any previous repairs or renovations.
Some states require sellers to disclose all known defects, while others only require disclosure of certain types of defects, such as structural or environmental issues.
It is important for buyers to be aware of the laws in their state and to ask the seller for any information that they are entitled to know under the law.
It is also important for sellers to be aware of their legal obligations and to provide buyers with all required disclosures. In general, it is always a good idea for both buyers and sellers to be transparent and honest about the condition of the property in order to avoid any potential legal disputes.
To know more buyer refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/13412366#
#SPJ11
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is a. composed of seven members who are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate. b. composed of 12 members of the Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives. c. elected by the general public. d. composed of representatives from the country's 12 largest commercial banks.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is a. composed of seven members who are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate.
What is the Federal Reserve System?The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is composed of seven members who are appointed by the President of the United States and approved by the Senate. The members serve staggered 14-year terms, with one term expiring every two years.
Therefore, The Chairman and Vice Chairman are also appointed by the President from among the members of the Board of Governors and serve for four-year terms. The Board of Governors is responsible for supervising and regulating banks, implementing monetary policy, and overseeing the nation's payment system.
Learn more about Federal Reserve System from
https://brainly.com/question/382312
#SPJ1
THE MONKEY'S PAW
ESCAPE ROOM code
Answer:
The the hek does that mean?
HELP QUICK!
Compared to whites, Latinos are incarcerated _____.
three times as often
half as often
as often
twice as often
A rubber balloon is blown up and released. It flies around the room as air is pushed out of the balloon. This is the best example of ___________.
a
Second law of motion
b
fourth law of motion
c
First law of motion
d
third law of motion
Answer:
it
third law of motion
Explanation:
Why is prosecution more important
Answer:
more important than what
ILL NAME U AS BRAINLIEST
Communism is an example of the interdependence between which two subject areas?
A) economics and psychology
B) sociology and human geography
C) political science and economics
D) political science and anthropology
Answer:
Option C
Political science and ecnomoics