Answers
Answer:
Most Public (Govt) Schools indoctrinate students in the religion of atheism, moral relativism, falsely teach evolution as science, & breed intolerance against Christians. Most kids in public schools are not taught how to think for themselves.
Explanation:
Related Questions
According to results from the Monitoring the Future survey, when did drug use among young Americans reach its highest level?
Answers
Answer:
1970s
[insert text bc Brainly wants at least 20 characters to “explain my answer well.”]
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Answers
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
a cpa sued a former client for the non-payment of the final bill. although happy with the cpa's performance of services, the client claimed that the cpa is not entitled to the final bill payment because the contract between the client and the cpa failed to meet the statute of frauds. the client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the cpa to complete the work, the contract price was well over $5,000, and though the client sent signed checks to the cpa, the client did not sign the contract. which of the following statements about this situation is correct?
Answers
The correct statement about this situation is "The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms". Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
The Statute of Frauds is a legal requirement that certain types of contracts must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. In this case, the contract between the CPA and the client falls under the Statute of Fraud because it involves a contract for services for a price of more than $5,000.
The client claims that the contract failed to meet the Statute of Fraud because it was not signed by the client. Although the client sent signed checks to the CPA, this does not satisfy the requirement that the contract itself must be signed.
Furthermore, the client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the CPA to complete the work, which could also be seen as a failure to meet the Statute of Frauds requirement for a definite term.
Therefore, option A is correct. The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms. The CPA may need to seek legal recourse to recover the final bill payment, but the lack of a signed contract may make it difficult to do so.
To know more about Fraud refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28239119#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
A CPA sued a former client for nonpayment of the final bill. Although happy with the CPA’s performance of services, the client claimed that the CPA is not entitled to the final bill payment because the contract between the client and the CPA failed to meet the Statute of Frauds. The client argues that the contract allowed up to 15 months for the CPA to complete the work, the contract price was well over $5,000, and though the client sent signed checks to the CPA, the client did not sign the contract. Which of the following statements about this situation is correct?
A) The Statute of Frauds does apply, and the requirements are not satisfied, thereby preventing enforcement of the contract terms.
B) The Statute of Frauds does not apply, allowing enforcement of the contract terms.
C) The Statute of Frauds does apply, but the requirements are satisfied by the client’s signing of the checks, allowing enforcement of the contract terms.
D) The Statute of Frauds does not apply, preventing enforcement of the contract terms.
Supporters of the ruling class of lawyers, merchants, businessmen, and planters in the South called them while their detractors refereed to them as .
Answers
Answer:
Redeemers
Bourbons
Explanation:
The Southern branch of the Party Establishment was the Redeemers. They were seeking to reclaim their political influence and to implement white nationalism.
You're deprived of your typical lab equipment but need to detect
hydrocarbons in evidence. Which of the following tools would you
most likely be able to use to release traces of hydrocarbons?
O A cigarette lighter
O A refrigerator
O A fruit-drying machine
O A faucet
Answers
Answer:
Lighter is correct
Explanation:
it contains butane
h e l p pleaseeee is due in 30 min
Answers
Answer:
In this case, the Supreme Court has to rule against Niskayuna High School. The reason for this is because the high school did not respect Goode's beliefs and practices when it came to religion. According to the summary, Goode had lost a Harvard scholarship just because of practicing religion. The high school does not have the right to take anything away from the student; therefore, the Supreme Court has to force the Highschool to pay for Goode's Harvard tuition. Also the court has to take into consideration the fact that the school violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendent, because every person in this world has to have the right to practice any religion as desired.
The Safety Responsibility Law was designed to remove irresponsible drivers from Georgia highways and to protect insured motorists from uninsured motorists. True are false
Answers
Answer: True
Explanation:
This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.
Status offenses are violations of the law:
Answers
Answer:
if this is a true or false i would say false
Explanation:
i also need more info to help you
anti-federalists argued thatbranches of government would keep each other in constitution would make states less constitution would create a republican government.a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.
Answers
The Anti-Federalists expressed several concerns about the proposed Constitution and argued for certain measures to address those concerns.
Here are the key points you mentioned, along with an explanation: Checks and Balances: The Anti-Federalists believed that the checks and balances among the branches of government outlined in the Constitution would not be sufficient to prevent the consolidation of power. They feared that without stronger limitations, one branch could dominate the others, leading to an overly powerful central government.
State Sovereignty: The Anti-Federalists were concerned that the Constitution would diminish the authority and autonomy of individual states. They believed that a strong central government would undermine the ability of states to govern themselves and protect their own interests. They argued for greater state sovereignty and more explicit protections for states' rights.
Individual Rights: The Anti-Federalists contended that the Constitution lacked a comprehensive Bill of Rights. They emphasized the importance of protecting individual liberties from potential government abuses and believed that a formal enumeration of rights was necessary to safeguard the people from both the federal government and from each other.
Republican Government: The Anti-Federalists generally supported the idea of a republican form of government, which is characterized by elected representatives who act on behalf of the people. They believed that a republic was the most effective system for protecting individual freedoms and preventing the concentration of power.
In response to these concerns, the Federalists, who supported the ratification of the Constitution, agreed to the addition of the Bill of Rights, which would explicitly protect individual liberties and address the Anti-Federalists' worries about potential government encroachments. The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was subsequently added to the Constitution in 1791.
Ultimately, the debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists shaped the compromise and compromises that led to the ratification of the Constitution, resulting in a stronger federal government while also establishing a system of checks and balances and protections for individual rights within a republican framework.
To know more about ,antifederalists click here:https://brainly.com/question/13838143
#SPJ11
Freedom of speech allows all of the following EXCEPT
O criticizing the government.
criticizing the actions of a neighbor.
telling lies that may badly harm another person.
delivering a speech in public.
Answers
Se encarga de vigilar y evaluar el ejercicio del gasto público, para lo cual realiza actos de fiscalización, con la finalidad de consolidar un gobierno de transparencia y honestidad
Answers
Answer:
Auditor General.
Explanation:
Un auditor es una persona que realiza una auditoría y verifica, mediante cuestionamiento, observación y escucha, cómo se está desarrollando una persona u organización y si se están cumpliendo las especificaciones financieras y legales que le son exigibles. Así, el Auditor General de Gobierno es el funcionario público que controla el estado financiero de las entidades de la administración pública, así como también lleva a cabo la fiscalización y control de cada acto particular que es realizado por el gobierno.
T/F Having control over how much money is spent, otherwise known as budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy.
Answers
True, having control over how much money is spent, otherwise known as budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy. This is because the governor can allocate funds to specific programs or agencies, prioritize certain projects, and potentially veto budget items, thereby shaping policy outcomes.
What is budgetary powers?
Budgetary powers refer to the authority and responsibility to create, allocate, and manage financial resources within an organization or government. In the context of government, budgetary powers typically involve the creation and management of the national or local budget, which outlines the expected revenues and expenditures for a given period.
The government's budgetary powers also include the ability to prioritize spending on different areas such as health care, education, defense, infrastructure, etc. This involves making decisions on how much money to allocate to each area, and determining which programs or projects should receive funding.
To know more about Budgetary powers:
https://brainly.com/question/31067316
#SPJ11
True, having control over how much money is spent, or budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy.
Budgetary powers give the governor the authority to allocate funds for various programs and projects within the state, thus shaping policy priorities. By adjusting funding levels, the governor can promote certain initiatives or discourage others, ultimately influencing the direction of state policy.
Additionally, the governor's involvement in the budget process often requires negotiation with state legislators, which further emphasizes the significance of these powers in shaping policy outcomes. Overall, budgetary powers serve as an essential tool for the governor to guide and impact state policy.
To know more about state policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1875331
#SPJ11
which u.s. supreme court case removed mandatory life without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders who had committed homicide?
Answers
Answer:
Having banned the use of the death penalty for juveniles in Roper, the Court left the sentence of life without parole as the harshest sentence available for offenses committed by people under 18. In Graham v. Florida, the Court banned the use of life without parole for juveniles not convicted of homicide.
To ensure that it is not violating any independence rules in its audit of ABC Co., the Stallion Accounting Firm (SAF) is reviewing all its relationships with ABC.
1. A covered member of SAF has committed to buy 100 shares of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?
2. A covered member of SAF is both the beneficiary and one of the trustees of a family trust. The member participates in the trust's investment decisions, and the trust has purchased 100 shares of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?
3. A covered member of SAF is the beneficiary of a family trust. The member does not participate in the trust's investment decisions. The trust has purchased 10 shares of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?
4. Cameron, a partner of SAF who is not a covered member, owns 11% of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?
5. Tal is a covered member for purposes of the ABC audit, for he provides more than 10 hours of tax advisory services to ABC every year. Tal just learned that when his Aunt Peggy dies, he will inherit 50 shares of ABC stock. He has arranged with his stock broker to sell the shares immediately after they come into his legal possession following probate of Aunt Peggy's will after she dies. Does this impair independence?
Answers
Independence in auditing is a critical concept that refers to the state of being free from all influences that may hinder or compromise a Certified Public Accountant's ability to act with integrity, objective judgment, and professional skepticism.
The concept of independence is essential because it ensures that auditors can produce unbiased and objective audit reports.To ensure that Stallion Accounting Firm (SAF) is not violating any independence rules in its audit of ABC Co., the firm is reviewing all its relationships with ABC. Let us evaluate whether each of the following relationships impairs independence.
1. A covered member of SAF has committed to buy 100 shares of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?Answer: Yes, this impairs independence. A covered member of SAF who has committed to purchasing ABC shares creates a direct financial interest in the audit client, and as such, independence is impaired.
2. A covered member of SAF is both the beneficiary and one of the trustees of a family trust. The member participates in the trust's investment decisions, and the trust has purchased 100 shares of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?
Answer: Yes, this impairs independence.
The covered member of SAF participates in the investment decisions of the family trust, which purchased 100 shares of ABC stock. By extension, the trust's interests become the member's interests, thus impairing independence.3. A covered member of SAF is the beneficiary of a family trust. The member does not participate in the trust's investment decisions. The trust has purchased 10 shares of ABC stock.
Does this impair independence?Answer: No, this does not impair independence. Since the covered member does not participate in the trust's investment decisions, their independence is not impaired.4. Cameron, a partner of SAF who is not a covered member, owns 11% of ABC stock. Does this impair independence?Answer: Yes, this impairs independence. Although Cameron is not a covered member, owning 11% of ABC stock creates a direct financial interest in the audit client, thus impairing independence.
5. Tal is a covered member for purposes of the ABC audit, for he provides more than 10 hours of tax advisory services to ABC every year. Tal just learned that when his Aunt Peggy dies, he will inherit 50 shares of ABC stock. He has arranged with his stock broker to sell the shares immediately after they come into his legal possession following probate of Aunt Peggy's will after she dies. Does this impair independence?
Answer: Yes, this impairs independence. The fact that Tal will inherit 50 shares of ABC stock creates a direct financial interest in the audit client, thus impairing independence.
To know more about Influences visit
https://brainly.com/question/13311950
#SPJ11
If I was a reporter in the country of Washington D.C and the President sent the Secret Service and they told me that I cannot report anything about the president anymore. What amendment is the government infringing on (what amendment protects me from that)?
Answers
Answer:
The First Amendment
Explanation:
In the United States Constitution, the First Amendment state that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Thus, Freedom of the PRESS is part of the United States First Amendment, that protects the right of individuals to acquire and disseminate data or viewpoints without government censorship or concern of penalty.
Hence, in this case, the amendment the government is infringing on is THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Do you believe the insanity defense should be allowed? Why or why not? Should all states be required to adopt "guilty, but mentally ill" or "guilty, but insane" statutes? response needs to be 350-500 words
Answers
Explanation:
The insanity defense is a legal concept that allows defendants to argue that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions because they were legally insane at the time of the crime. The defense is based on the idea that individuals who are suffering from a mental illness or disability should not be punished for criminal acts that were a direct result of their illness or disability.
There is debate over the use of the insanity defense and whether or not it should be allowed. Some argue that it is necessary to provide a mechanism for individuals who are mentally ill to receive the appropriate treatment and support rather than punishment. However, others believe that the insanity defense is too often abused and used as a loophole for criminals to avoid punishment.
As for the requirement of all states to adopt "guilty but mentally ill" or "guilty but insane" statutes, it is a complex issue. On one hand, having consistent standards across the country could provide clearer guidelines and more predictable outcomes. On the other hand, states may have different needs and priorities, and a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective.
It is also worth noting that the insanity defense is just one aspect of the criminal justice system and addressing broader issues such as access to mental health resources, support for individuals with mental illness, and the role of the criminal justice system in addressing mental health may be more effective in reducing crime and improving outcomes for those who are mentally ill.
In conclusion, the insanity defense is a complex and controversial issue, with arguments for and against its use. While the idea of having consistent standards across all states may seem appealing, it is important to consider the unique needs and priorities of each state when making decisions about the criminal justice system.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
16. Which part of the Bill of Rights guarantees each person the right to hold any religious belief they choose?
Second Amendment
free exercise clause
freedom of speech
Fourth Amendment
Answers
Answer: free exercise clause
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights is made up of the first ten amendments in the Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights consist of the rights of every Americans.
According to The Free Exercise Clause, Americans have the right to practice any religion that they want. Under the Free Exercise Clause, the religious beliefs of the citizens are protected. Also, the government shouldn't support any religion or become involved with one is as not to bring about controversy.
The death rate due to collisions increased in all driving areas at night
Answers
Answer:
50% of traffic deaths happen at night
50% of road fatalities occur at night, and the death rate from collisions increased across all driving zones.
What is death?
The whole-brain standard states that human death is the permanent end of all brain functions, including those of the brain stem.
50% of road fatalities occur at night, despite the fact that we only drive 25% of the time then. Driving at night is always riskier, regardless of whether the route is well-known or not.
Hence, the significance of the death is aforementioned.
Learn more about the death, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26067728
#SPJ2
_______ is when someone has some sort of mental or physical defect that prevents him or her from being able to enter into a legally binding contract.
Answers
The term you are looking for is "incapacity". Incapacity refers to the inability of an individual to make informed decisions due to some kind of mental or physical defect. This incapacity can be temporary or permanent and can affect an individual's ability to understand the nature of a contract, its terms, and its implications.
In the context of contract law, incapacity means that the affected individual is not legally competent to enter into a contract, and any contract entered into by them may be considered void or unenforceable.
Mental incapacity can arise due to a variety of factors such as mental illness, cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, and even intoxication. Physical incapacity can arise due to factors such as injury, illness, or disability. In such cases, a court may appoint a legal guardian or conservator to act on behalf of the incapacitated individual and make legal decisions for them.
It is important to note that the determination of incapacity is not always straightforward and may require a formal evaluation by a medical or legal expert. The law generally seeks to protect individuals with mental or physical incapacity from being exploited or taken advantage of, especially in contractual relationships. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of these issues when entering into any contractual agreement.
Learn more about physical defect here:
https://brainly.com/question/29796206
#SPJ11
Joshua Gnaizda received an envelope in the mail from Time, Inc. The front of the envelope contained two see-through windows partially revealing the envelope's contents. One window
showed Joshua's name and address. The other revealed the following statement: "JOSHUA A. GNAIZDA, I'LL GIVE YOU THIS VERSATILE NEW CALCULATOR WATCH FREE JUST FOR OPENING THIS ENVELOPE BEFORE FEBRUARY 15, 1985." Beneath the offer was a picture of the calculator watch itself. Joshua's mother opened the envelope and realized she had been deceived by a ploy to get her to open a piece of junk mail. The see-through window had not revealed the full extent of Time's offer. Printed below the picture of the calculator watch, and not viewable through the see-through window, were the following additional words: "AND MAILING THIS CERTIFICATE TODAY!" The certificate itself clearly required that Joshua
purchase a subscription to Fortune magazine in order to receive the free calculator watch. The good news was that Joshua could save up to 66% on the subscription, which might even be tax deductible. Even more important to the bargain hunter, prices may never be this low again. The bad news was that Time obviously had no intention of giving Joshua the versatile new calculator watch just for opening the envelope. Joshua's parents sued on his behalf for, among other things, damages equal to the value of the watch and $15,000,000 in punitive damages. Did Time, Inc. act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine? Did Joshua's
parents act ethically in filing the lawsuit against Time, Inc.? How would you decide this case?
Answers
Time, Inc. did not act ethically in its attempt to gain subscriptions to Fortune magazine by using deceptive practices such as making an offer in the mail, which seemed to be free, but was in reality, conditioned upon the purchase of a subscription to Fortune magazine.
It used fraudulent means to create a façade of a free offer and lure in subscribers. This violates ethical principles that require transparency in business practices. Joshua's parents acted ethically in filing a lawsuit against Time, Inc. The company's deception not only misrepresented the offer, but it also violated the rights of the recipient. Hence, it was imperative to file a lawsuit in the matter to protect their rights.
The lawsuit was the correct approach to hold the company accountable for its unethical practices. The case would be decided in favor of Joshua's parents, as the company's actions are a clear violation of ethical principles. The court may award compensation to Joshua for the value of the watch and may impose punitive damages on Time, Inc. to deter the company from using such fraudulent methods to obtain subscriptions.
To know more about lawsuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31360444
#SPJ11
Every time you prepare to drive, before you start the engine of your parked vehicle you must make sure the vehicle is in Park or Neutral gear. High gear. Low gear.
Answers
Before starting the engine of a parked vehicle, it is important to make sure that the vehicle is in either Park or Neutral gear.
When preparing to drive, it is important to ensure that the vehicle is in either Park or Neutral gear before starting the engine. This is because starting the engine in any other gear can cause the car to move unexpectedly, potentially leading to an accident.
Park is the ideal gear for automatic transmission vehicles, as it locks the transmission and prevents the wheels from moving. In manual transmission vehicles, Neutral is the safest gear to start the engine in, as it disconnects the engine from the wheels. It is important to always follow this step to ensure a safe driving experience.
Learn more about Neutral gear: https://brainly.com/question/31927758
#SPJ11
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities. In the past three years, it has issued over $2 billion in securities, and $1 billion of those securities are in the hands of the public. This very large enterprise:
Answers
Answer:
MegaGlobal is a company that wants to issue publicly traded securities, based on all these facts about this company, that is it has issued a lot of money to the public. it is a very large enterprise which is considered to be a "well-known seasoned issuer" and this company is subject to a less restrictive registration proceedings compared to other companies.
Tom is a convicted offender held in a correctional center in the state of Staxon. He is set to appear as a witness in a trial that is being held in the state of Vanadia. Which of the following statements is true of this scenario?
The trial will have to be shifted to the state in which Tom is being held, as witnesses for courts cannot be held in jails.
Tom will have to be held in a lockup in Vanadia, as he cannot be held in a jail.
Tom cannot be held in a lockup in Vanadia if he requires medical care.
Tom can be held in a jail in Vanadia only if he is a witness in a federal trial.
Answers
In 1968, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration was created and was responsible for administering the
higher education opportunities for law enforcement professionals.
Answers
Established in 1968, the LEAA was set up within the U.S Department of Justice to allocate money to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice system. Between 1968 and 1977, the LEAA spent more than $6 billion on crime control programs and college education for police officers
As it were 1 percent of neighborhood law requirements organizations require a four-year degree, and 75 percent have no formal approach connecting instruction with advancement. We contend that a four-year degree standard has not been embraced since police organizations and police work have not changed in ways that require it. We do address presumptions that higher instruction is basic to police polished skill, which a four-year degree makes strides in execution. Encouragement, we attest that police preparation and instruction are similar endeavors in which a more full integration is needed. We conclude with proposals to extend participation between the criminal equity workforce and police directors.Correct question: In 1968, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration was created and was responsible for administering higher education opportunities for law enforcement professionals.
To know more about LEAA visit: https://brainly.in/question/32686119
#SPJ9
Alcohol use is considered to be a problem if
Answers
Answer:
It affects you senses/ ability to make good decisions.
Explanation:
If it changes the way you think, talk, see or act . Having a moderaate amount is okay and even encouraged by some doctors but if you drink too much there can be consequences. The best (and sdaly most dangerous) consequence I can think of is drunck driving.
Alcohol messes with you abilty to react, and being able to stop when you need to is hard when intoxicated.
That’s The girl That keeps posting all of Those link To Their question That’s what I want The phone number for brainly so I can call Them about it
Answers
Explanation:
Yes you are right she even did on mine I complained
This case made the 2nd Amendment's right to bear arms applicable to the States,as a fundamental right.
Answers
The answer is District of Columbia v. Heller
How does this map reflect the legacy of Plessy v. Ferguson?
Answers
B
Is the wring answer
What does “privilege” mean with respect to lawyer-client relationship and give an example
Answers
Answer:
i would think it would mean like its a privilege to be able to work and fight for someone? im not to sure tho.
Explanation: