Answer:
In my personal opinion, the wrongfully convicted should receive compensation after being released from jail or prison.
Explanation:
Being questioned while being innocent can very much damage someone's mental health due to the immense pressure, and being put in jail/prison for something you did not do is overall unjust. The least that someone could get for being wrongfully convicted is atleast getting paid.
After a New York state court trial in which Bernie appears and vigorously defends himself, the New York state court awards Donald $1.5M dollars in damages for his tort claim. In trying to collect from Bernie in Vermont, Donald must have the Vermont court certify the New York judgment. Why, ordinarily, must the Vermont court do so?
The Vermont court must certify the New York ruling to make it valid in Vermont. Bernie would not have to pay damages if the New York decision is not certified in Vermont. The Vermont court certifies the ruling, making Bernie legally compelled to pay $1.5M in damages.
Why, ordinarily, must the Vermont court do so?Generally, The Vermont court must certify the New York judgment in order to give it legal force and effect in the state of Vermont.
Without certification, the New York judgment is not legally binding in Vermont and Bernie would not be required to pay the damages.
By certifying the judgment, the Vermont court is recognizing the judgment as valid and enforceable in the state of Vermont, making Bernie legally obligated to pay the $1.5M dollars in damages.
Read more about court
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ1
Why would there be a need for Military, tribal and International courts?
Answer:
Well if we didn't have them we would be screwed!!
Which term refers to the methods of enforcing legal obligations?
Select one:
a. constitution
O b. procedural law
O c. precedent
O d. substantive law
when a court issues an order that may either require or forbid a party to perform a specified act, the court has issued a(n) .
When a court issues an order that may either require or forbid a party to perform a specified act, the court has issued a consideration.
An injunction is a court order requiring a person to do or end up doing a selected action. There are 3 sorts of injunctions: everlasting Injunctions, brief restraining orders, and initial injunctions. Transient Retraining Orders (TRO) and initial injunctions are equitable in nature.
Appellate jurisdiction method that the courtroom has the authority to check the selections of decreased courts. Most of the cases the ideally suited courtroom hears are appeals from decreased courts.
Learn more about court here https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Limited partners are best described as:
Question 1 options:
Investors in a partnership
Partners that make only a limited financial contribution
Partners in a general partnership
Partners that receive a smaller portion of the partnership’s profits
Limited partners are best described as partners that make only a limited financial contribution to a partnership. option b is correct option.
Limited partners are investors who provide capital to a partnership but do not take an active role in the management of the business. In a limited partnership, there are both general partners, who manage the business and are personally liable for the partnership's debts, and limited partners, who are passive investors and have limited liability for the partnership's debts. Limited partners typically receive a portion of the partnership's profits, but this portion is smaller than what the general partners receive. The limited partners' liability is limited to the amount of their investment in the partnership.
For such more question on financial
https://brainly.com/question/13999832
#SPJ4
Discuss and summarize the importance of building laws and codes
to the architecture practice.
The importance of building laws and codes to the architecture practice is that it ensures the safety, health, and welfare of the public by providing minimum standards for the design, construction, and maintenance of buildings.
Building codes are a set of regulations that must be followed when constructing buildings to ensure that they meet minimum standards for safety, fire protection, energy efficiency, and other critical areas. Architects are required to stay up-to-date with the latest building codes and regulations to ensure that their designs meet the minimum standards and comply with local laws. Failure to comply with building codes and regulations can result in fines, legal action, or even loss of life. Therefore, building laws and codes are crucial to the architecture practice to ensure the safety and well-being of the public.
To learn more about building code visit: https://brainly.com/question/31032521
#SPJ11
Jackie is cheated when she buys a defective car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Jackie has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Jackie tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.
Answer:
Jackie needs therapy she's a maniac
Explanation:
Im going to help people who need points so just answer my question dhtfjkkk lol ghnnv
Answer:
thx :)
Explanation:
ayoooooooo i'm bored lma.o.
in a civil action tried to a jury, the defendant objected to the introduction by the plaintiff of certain evidence without the judge's first making a preliminary ruling on the admissibility of the evidence. for which evidence is the defendant's objection not appropriate?
The defendant objected to the plaintiff introducing specific evidence in a civil case before a jury without the court first issuing a finding.
Who is the defendant in every case?
Typically, "The People," or the State acting on behalf of the victim, is referred to as the plaintiff in criminal cases. The person or persons accused with a crime or violation of a law are known as the Defendant. The plaintiff in a civil case is the individual or people who claim that they have been the victim of wrongdoing.
a someone who files a civil lawsuit. The term "plaintiff" is no longer used in England and Wales (since 1998), but it is still used in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and the majority of other common law countries. Scots people use the term "pursuer."
Know more about court Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ4
The following evidence is presented to a jury: Dr. Tom has to operate John for a heart condition at 9:00 am, but decides to drink a cup of coffee at the cafeteria, and does not arrive at the third floor until 9:15 am. John is unconscious on a gurney at St. Thomas Hospital’s third floor. The elevator shaft’s doors are open. Somehow the gurney rolls into the shaft at 9:00 am, and John falls to his death.
1. Dr. Tom had “breach of duty”.
2. Dr. Tom had “proximate cause”.
3. Dr. Tom had “Res Ipsa Loquitur”.
4. Both “a” and “c”.
Option 1 is correct. Dr. Tom had done a “breach of duty”.
About breach of duty
A person commits a breach of duty when their actions fall short of the required level of care. Among the four components of neglect is it.
The defendant is deemed to have violated that obligation if their actions fell short of the expected level of care. By texting while driving, for instance, a driver might violate his responsibility to drive safely around other motorists. Note that the jury's decision on whether a defendant violated their duty is based on a matter of fact.
To know more about breach of duty:
brainly.com/question/13885689
#SPJ1
A higher minimum age for a corrections agency helps ensure _____. better understanding of the challenges faced by the offender population longer employment terms a more mature, responsible workforce better salaries
Answer:
A more mature, responsible workforce
Explanation:
Answer:
a more mature, responsible workforce
2. What problems do for-private prisons bring up for Latinos in the criminal justice system.
Answer:
High rates of violence.High employee turnover.Lack of qualified employees.Lack of training for employees.High economic expenditure.Explanation:
Private prisons are institutions that confine criminals and are, in most cases, used by state governments through contracts with those governments. These contracts may cover the entire presidency or only part of it.
This type of prison presents a great economic expense in relation to the lack of infrastructure and qualified professionals it presents. This allows the rate of violence between detainees and between staff and detainees to be very high, in addition to compromising rights and fair treatment among detainees.
Can a prisoner sue me
Which of the following intelligence agencies employs the most mathematicians?
Answer:
National Security Agency/Central Security Service
Explanation:
NSA is also one of the most important centers of foreign language analysis and research within the U.S. government and is said to be the largest employer of mathematicians in the United States and perhaps the world.
Your Welcome :)
In the course, you were presented with a video entitled How to Make Better Decisions. According to the video, you won't make the best decision every time. So, what should you do? (Select all that apply. )
Stick to your decision no matter the outcome
Make the same decision next time to see if it works better then
Have a backup plan
None of the above
According to the video "How to Make Better Decisions," when faced with the possibility of not making the best decision, it is advisable to have a backup plan. Sticking to a decision regardless of the outcome or repeatedly making the same decision in the hope of a better result is not recommended.
The video highlights that making the best decision every time is not always possible. It acknowledges that mistakes and suboptimal outcomes can occur despite careful consideration and analysis. In such situations, it is important to be adaptable and have a backup plan. Having a contingency plan allows for flexibility and the ability to adjust course if the initial decision does not yield the desired results.
Sticking to a decision no matter the outcome can be problematic because it disregards new information, feedback, or changing circumstances that may require a different approach. It can lead to stubbornness and an unwillingness to acknowledge and rectify errors. Similarly, repeatedly making the same decision expecting a different outcome is not an effective strategy. It overlooks the need for learning from past experiences and adjusting one's approach based on lessons learned.
Therefore, having a backup plan is a prudent approach. It allows for adaptation, course correction, and learning from one's decisions. It enables individuals to be prepared for unforeseen circumstances, mitigate risks, and increase the likelihood of achieving favorable outcomes. By having alternative strategies or options in place, individuals can respond more effectively to unexpected challenges or setbacks, improving their decision-making process overall.
Learn more about backup plan here : brainly.com/question/32541164
#SPJ11
What is the maximum punishment for murder under UK law?
Answer:
life sentence or life in prison
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
When entering the interstate on a short entrance ramp where there is no acceleration lane, you should:
- Immediately enter the far-right traffic lane on the interstate and speed up to match the flow of traffic.
- Use the shoulder of the main road to get up to the speed of traffic.
- Speed up and enter the interstate only after you have identified a gap in traffic.
When entering the interstate on a short entrance ramp where there is no acceleration lane, you should speed up and enter the interstate only after you have identified a gap in traffic.
It's crucial to be cautious and properly integrate with the flow of traffic while using a short entry ramp without an acceleration lane to reach the interstate. Once you have located a break in the traffic that is wide enough for you to merge safely, you should accelerate, and only then should you join the highway.
An accident risk might be increased if you attempt to speed up to keep up with the flow of traffic as soon as you join the highway. Similarly, it is typically not safe to accelerate on the main road's shoulder because doing so might endanger other drivers and pedestrians.
Learn more about interstate entrance here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167643
#SPJ6
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
true/false. individuals who have faith in government to improve people's lives, believing that private efforts are insufficient. in the social sphere, liberals usually support diverse lifestyles and tend to oppose any government action that seeks to shape personal choice.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
That statement describes liberal viewpoints
You own a German Shepherd named Max who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering.To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the womanâs medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiffâs claim before trial?voir diremotion for a directed verdictdiscoverypretrial conference
In the above situation, it may be stated that the defendant will use discovery as the aspect for learning more regarding the claim made against him by the plaintiff before a trial. Therefore, the option C holds true.
A defendant may be regarded as the person who is under question while being heard in a trial in the court of law. Moreover, it is also to be interpreted that the plaintiff is the one who makes the charges against a defendant. In order to know more about the charges made against him, the defendant actually uses the procedure of discovery before ultimately moving into the trial.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/30736002
#SPJ4
Complete question
You own a German Shepherd named Max, who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering. To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the woman's medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.
What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiff's claim before trial?
A. Voir dire
B. motion for a directed verdict
C. discovery
D. pretrial conference
1.Who is the MLA (Member of the Legislative Assembly)? What party does he/she belong to?
2. What are the 2 conditions that candidates must fulfill before their names can appear on a ballot?
3. In order to be elected, what must candidates convince the voters of?
4. What 4 things make people eligible to vote in a provincial election?
5. What will eligible voters receive before election day?
6.List the 4 stages of how people vote on election day.
1. MLA is a member of the legislative assembly is one who is elected by the public as their representative in the legislative assembly.
2. The two conditions that candidates must fulfill before their names can appear on a ballot are:
a. The candidate must sign petition signatures by the people who did not participate in any election through any political party.
b. He should fill out the application form and sign it after that his/her name will be able to come on the ballot.
3. The candidate must convince all the voters that he is a good leader for them and also fulfill all the necessary needs and demands. he /she should raise up from the caste, gender, religion, etc. as these social aspects may lead to the defeat of the candidate in elections.
4.a. One should be a citizen of the country.
b. One should meet their state's residency requirements.
c. Should be 18 yrs old on or before the day of the election.
d. Should be registered to vote by the state's voter registration deadline.
5. Before the election day the eligible voters receive the final speech by their representative o the candidate standing in elections.
6. The four stages through which people vote on election day are:
1. First of all the voter has to decide who is the correct representative according to their point of view.
2. Now he should have to go to the polling booth.
3. Now he has to select their representative on the ballot machine.
4. Now he has to click on the election symbol of their representative.
read more about MLA at:
https://brainly.com/question/30404365
The police training officer (PTO) programs, in contrast to others, stress _____.
community policing techniques and principles
critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work
the physical work of policing
administrative aspects of police work
B) "critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work" is the right answer
Answer:
critical-thinking skills as they apply to police work
Explanation:
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Why is it important to carefully document an interview? a. You can learn from the problems and successes during the interview b. It can help you determine if the company is the right fit for you c. Documenting the information can help you prepare for a second interview d. All of the above Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
d
Explanation:
all above
A planned interaction in which one party asks questions and the other responds is known as an interview. A talk between an interviewer and an interviewee is referred to as a "interview" in everyday speech. Hence option D is correct .
What is Interview ?The interviewee answers the interviewer's questions by supplying information. Other people may receive that information right here or later.
This characteristic is common to many different types of interviews; even though there may not be any other people present during a job interview or an interview with , the answers will still be given to other people later on in the hiring or process.
Additionally, information can be passed back and forth during an interview. , interviews , however person may be using telephone interviews or conferencing when the person are not present.
Speaking dialogue between two or more people during interviews . Sometimes two people can have a "conversation" by typing their questions and responses.
Learn more about Interview here
https://brainly.com/question/13073622
# SPJ 2
GUYS, PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE RIGHT ANSWER!!!
Explanation:
only claim crédits since the 3
According to the English bill of rights, who makes laws regarding taxation?
Floyd is riding his bicycle down the street while texting on his phone. floyd does not see vivian, a store owner, who is putting magazines out in front of her storefront. he looks up just in time and swerves to miss vivian but knocks her entire magazine rack and newsstand down, totally destroying it. is floyd liable?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, Vivian has a competent loss and lost money.
Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
What is money?Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.
Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.
Therefore, a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ2
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle possessed the firearm
Answer:
Explanation:
37.)Which of the following statements is NOT accurate with respect to judicial notice?
a) a judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute
b) judicial notice promotes trial efficiency
c) judicial notice is treated differently with respect to civil and criminal trials
d) judicial notice is only appropriate during the prosecutors case in chief
38.)Tom Markell is stopped by the police while driving his automobile on his way home from
work. It turns out that there are tow other passengers in the car, Jay and Larry. The police
observe a handgun on the floor of the interior of the automobile. All three occupants of the
vehicle state, "what gun..I didn't know there was a gun in the vehicle. As the prosecutor
on the case, can all three occupants of the vehicle be charged with criminal possession of a weapon?
a) yes, under the theory of judicial notice
b) yes, under the open view presumption under the law
none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
c) no, none of the occupants of the vehicle constructively possessed the firearm
d) no, it is pure speculation that any of the occupants of the vehicle
state law requires you to turn off your high beam headlights and switch to low beam headlights when a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction gets no closer than______feet away from you.
State law requires that you turn off your high beams and switch to low beams if a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction is within 300-500 feet.
In many states, the law requires drivers to switch from high beams to low beams when oncoming vehicles are within a certain distance. This distance is commonly referred to as "reasonable visibility". This means that if there is an oncoming vehicle at a distance where it is difficult for either driver to see clearly due to the intensity of the high beams, it is time to switch to low beams.
No specific distance is specifically mentioned in state law, but 300 to 500 feet is often considered a practical approximation. However, it is important to note that exact distances may vary depending on factors such as local traffic laws, weather conditions, road layouts and other relevant considerations.
To know more about beam headlight visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31847252
#SPJ4