Answers
Answer:
YESS
Explanation:
The Constitution addresses the main problems facing the Articles of Confederation. (weak national gov.)
For example, the government had no power to tax, this meant they could only raise funds if the states willingly donated money. The national government could not fund military forces which lead to the inability to suppress Shay's rebellion.
Shay's rebellion was a protest attack held by a group of poor farmers.
Related Questions
12 . if it has been previously suspended and reinstated, your license will be suspended for accumulating ____ points within a three-year period.
Answers
If it has been previously suspended and reinstated, your license will be suspended for accumulating 8 points within three years.
What is a license suspension?A license suspension involves the taking away of a license or privilege for some period.
Some license suspensions may be definite while others are indefinite.
Thus, while the first-time suspension is based on the accumulation of 12 points within three years, a subsequent suspension is based on 8 points.
Learn more about license suspension at https://brainly.com/question/13112961
Which legal requirement is necessary for becoming a U.S. citizen?
1.Applicants must be at least twenty one years of age.
o
2.Applicants must be able to pass a naturalization test.
3.Applicants must be able to name all of the national holidays.
4.Applicants must be residents of the country for at least one year.
Answers
Answer:
2.
Explanation:
You must be able to pass a naturalization test.
Which of the following guidelines has HHS established as standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace?
A. Obtain the consent of the individual, employer, or employee prior to conducting an online person search, assisting with of facilitating enrollment through the Marketplace, assisting the individual in applying for APTC and CSRs, and making updates to a consumer's eligibility application or subsequent plan selection and enrollment.
B. Protect consumer's personally identifiable information (PII)
C. Provide consumers with connect information regarding the Marketplace, QHPs offered through the Marketplace, and insurance affordability programs.
D. Refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Answers
The guidelines that the Health and Human Services has established as standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
What is the Health and Human Services?This is a federal service that established the standards of conduct for agents, brokers, and web-brokers who participate in the Marketplace in order to protect against conduct that is harmful to consumers or prevents the efficient operation of the Marketplace
Hence, the guidelines on standards of conduct is to refrain from marketing or conduct that is misleading, coercive, or discriminates based on race, color, national origin,disability, age, sex, gender identity, or sexual orientation.
Read more about HHS
brainly.com/question/2093822
#SPJ1
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answers
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Hello! If a synovial ganglion (cyst) bursts due to a sudden movement or blow, does it reappear?
Answers
Answer:
This is a tricky one. If it bursts than there is a high risk on infection. However, there is a chance it will happen again, especially if the area is not properly cleaned after bursting and if the gunk isn't cleaned up. It could be dangerous if it is an internal cyst, so please be careful.
According to the top chart, what percentage of federal civil cases were tried before juries in 2010?
Answers
Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:
Answer:
42.354%
Explanation:
To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.
5082 ---- 100%
2154 ----- x
x = (2154 * 100) / 5082
x = 42.354%
T OR F please answer everything from the book canadian political structure and public administration
____ 1. Rupert’s Land was purchased for $1.5 million. ____ 2. A federal system of government gives all the power to the federal government. ____ 3. The BNA Act was the first statute passed by the Canadian government. ____ 4. The new nation of Canada was a legislative union, a government structure borrowed from Britain. ____ 5. The federal government is responsible for maintaining peace, order, and good government
multiple choice
1. The original members of Confederation were a. Canada West, Canada East, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland b. Canada West, Canada East, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia c. Canada West, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island d. Canada East, Newfoundland, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia e. Rupert’s Land, Canada West, Canada East, and New Brunswick
2. Confederation promised a. economic advantages b. transportation advantages c. defence advantages d. trade advantages e. all of the above
3. The Canadian Constitution, embodied in the BNA Act, borrowed from Britain a. a legislature composed of two Houses of Parliament b. the political party system c. the principle of responsible government d. b and c e. a, b, and c
4. A major departure of Canada from the British system of government was its structure as a a. unitary state b. legislative union c. constitutional monarchy d. federation e. all of the above
5. The powers of municipal, or local, governments are based in a. the Constitution b. provincial powers to form and maintain local governments c. federal powers to form and maintain local governments d. all of the above e. none of the above
Answers
1. False. Rupert's Land was originally purchased for £300,000.
2. False. A federal system of government divides powers between the federal government and regional governments.
3. False. The BNA Act (also now known as the Constitution Act, 1867) was not the first statute passed by the Canadian government.
4. False. The new nation of Canada was a federal system and not a legislative union like Britain.
5. True. The federal government in Canada is responsible for maintaining peace, order, and good government.
Multiple choice questions:
1. The original members of Confederation were Canada West, Canada East, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Option B is the correct answer.
2.Confederation promised economic advantages, transportation advantages, defence advantages and trade advantages. Option C is the answer.
3. The Canadian Constitution, embodied in the BNA Act, borrowed from Britain the political party system and the principle of responsible government. Option D is the answer.
4. A major departure of Canada from the British system of government was its structure as a federation. Option D is the correct answer.
5. The powers of municipal, or local, governments are based in a the Constitution provincial powers to form and maintain local governments. Option B is the answer.
To learn more about Federalism:
https://brainly.com/question/30154201
#SPJ4
Examples of checks and balances do not include
Answers
According to a political perspective, the statement which is not an example of checks and balances is "the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president."
What are Checks and Balances?Checks and Balances are part of the government principle whereby government separations into different branches. Each is authorized to prevent actions by other branches and is prompted to share power.
Usually, the principle of checks and balances is commonly found in constitutional governments.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "the supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president."
The available options are:
A. The supreme court can declare actions by the president and laws passed by Congress unconstitutional.
B. The president nominates supreme court justices, and the Senate must confirm the nominations.
C. The supreme court can impeach the president and reject appointments made by the president.
D. The president can veto laws passed by congress, and congress can override a presidential veto.
Learn more about Checks and Balances here: https://brainly.com/question/8927972
A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the Wisconsin courts. In deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider:
Answers
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
a. cases from other jurisdictions.
b. social values and customs.
c. public policy.
d. survey data from the local community.
Answer:
d. survey data from the local community.
Explanation:
If there was no such case, previously in the city, it is not possible that there is relevant local research data in the community to help the case unfold, since the community has no background on this matter. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for the judge to consider these data, in addition to that it would show his unpreparedness to deal with this type of situation.
Do you think a country without government is considered a state Brainly?
Answers
No a country without government is not considered a state.
No state would have been required to govern every citizen if everyone was good and every individual was self-sufficient in every way. But the truth is that nobody is perfect and none of us are independent. We rely on one another. Therefore, a state is required to manage society and establish order. Chaos will result if not. In order to defend the state against outside threats, a state is also necessary.
There is a complete disconnect between governments and their citizens in many countries nowadays. Governments serve interests and powers that have nothing to do with the interests of the people; instead, they attempt to manipulate and take advantage of the populace to further their own specific interests and objectives.
To learn more about citizen please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ4
Aceable Driving Test
1. The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the _______ insurance will covered.
A.) total amount
B.) bodily damage
C.) the maximum payment
D.) GAP Coverage
Answers
Answer:
A: the total amount it will cover I think
The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the total amount insurance will covered. Texas rules require you to have at least $30,000 in bodily injury coverage per person.
What is insurance coverage?
insurance coverage is the amount of liability that a person can cover or entitle for a particular loss or damage against insurance services.
Insurance is of many types like auto insurance, life insurance, vehicle insurance, and others.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about insurance coverage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15702391
#SPJ2
laws play a bigger role than parents do, when it comes to teen driving
Answers
Answer:
Yes because there are laws to prevent teen driving after a certain time.
Explanation:
Answer:
Not sure what the question is but this is true
steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. what is he engaging in?
Answers
Steven, a prosecutor, has decided to bring three other felony charges against Brian, in addition to the burglary he was originally arrested for. He is engaging in Horizontal overcharging.
A single defendant is unfairly the target of a "horizontal" overcharging of accusations. Every technical criminal transaction in which he took part may result in a separate accusation being brought against him, or the prosecution could break up a single criminal transaction into several component charges.
In legal parlance, "tacking on" extra charges that the prosecutor is aware he cannot support is known as overcharging. It is used to give the prosecutor more leverage while negotiating a plea deal. All of the charges in cases of horizontal overcharging may be true, yet the defendant cannot be found guilty and sentenced on all of the charges. In order to reduce the number and severity of charges, the defense attorney should begin objecting to the overcharging as soon as they can.
Learn more about Guilty here:
https://brainly.com/question/8193162
#SPJ4
at which stage of the hearing are defendants brought before a judge to possibly be afforded the opportunity for bail?
Answers
Answer:
This first appearance is called an arraignment and it is here that the bail decision is generally made. Frequently cases are resolved at the arraignment.
Explanation:
You are the health information manager at General Hospital. Your in-house counsel has been contacted by an attorney for a former patient of the hospital whose inpatient hospitalization resulted in some harm to the patient. That harm was documented in an incident report prepared by hospital staff. Internal legal review of the incident report indicates that the harm described by the patient’s attorney is consistent with the harm described in the incident report. Based on the conversations between General Hospital counsel and the patient’s attorney, the counsel believes a lawsuit is imminent.
There are three parts of the discussion to be addressed in your initial response.
First, discuss which source(s) of law might govern this scenario and give an example of one source of law that would be applicable.
Secondly, discuss which part of the legal process of a lawsuit you would be involved with as the health information manager.
Lastly, what content can and/or cannot be released to the patient’s attorney and what legislation may govern this process and content release?
Answers
It should be noted that as the health information manager, one will be involved in the incident report which was to identify harm on the patient.
The legal uses of the health record are that they form the backbone of the professional liability action and can establish whether the standard of care was met. Also, they are required for civil actions.
Lastly, the incident reports that were filed is highly confidential and cannot be released to the patient’s attorney or be used against the nurse practitioner in a lawsuit
Learn more about health manager on:
https://brainly.com/question/10643509
(repost since it got taken down but non of the fakes did ) to everyone whos copy and pasting the paragraph EVERYONE STOP DOING WHAT YOUR DOING AND GO TO THE LEADERBOARDS ALL OF THOS PEOPLE PUT FAKE ANSWERS. AND BRAINLY MODS IF UR READING THIS DELETE ANLL THEIR ANSWERS ALSO FREE POINTS please stop your lagging out the brainly servers for me and everyone else using this site so please plan your attack on the fakes later please or even tomorrow thank you.
Answers
Answer:
dang...
Explanation:
well, don't worry. I don't copy and paste c.ra.p everywhere-
I agree, spamming is definitely not the right way to protest since peaceful people just trying to get help on their work are being affected by this.
may I have Brainliest? I'm stuck on Expert ( ╯︿╰ )
Answer:
thx
Explanation:
Question 7 of 10
Which situation would allow a country to increase the goods it imports
despite spending the same amount of money?
A. The country's government approved an increase in its trade deficit.
B. The country's currency experienced a major decline in interest
rates
C. The inflation rate of the country's currency increased
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased
Answers
If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, the import increases while spending same amount.
So, option D. is correct.
Define import.An import is a product or service purchased in one country but made in the other. Import is among the most important aspects of international trade.
If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, it would help the country to import more items while spending the very same amount of money.
So, option D. is correct.
Find out more information about import here:
https://brainly.com/question/14099397?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased
Explanation:
a p e ex
Disclosing workplace issues in a public setting is _
Answers
Which of the following is a properly reversed version of the following Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's Laws? (2 == 3) && (-1 < 5) && isPrime(n) a. (2 != 3) && (-1 > 5) && isPrime(n) b. (2 == 3) || (-1<5) || isPrime(n) c. !(2 == 3) && !(-1<5) && !isPrime(n) d. (2 !=3) || (-1 >= 5) || !isPrime(n) e. !(2 != 3) || !(-1<5) || isNotPrime(n) 4
Answers
The properly reversed version of the following Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's Laws is (2 != 3) || (-1>=5) || !is Prime(n).The Boolean expression provided is (2 == 3) && (-1 < 5) && is Prime(n).
De Morgan's laws are two laws that describe how logical operations, such as AND and OR, can be inverted using NOT. The first law of De Morgan states that the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations. In other words, !(A && B) is equivalent to !A || !B.
The second law of De Morgan states that the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations. In other words, !(A || B) is equivalent to !A && !B.Using the first law of De Morgan, we can write the inverse of the given Boolean expression as:(2 != 3) || (-1>=5) || !isPrime(n)This is the properly reversed version of the given Boolean expression, according to De Morgan's laws.
For more such questions on De Morgan's Laws
https://brainly.com/question/13278160
#SPJ11
Describe a situation where two different people might perceive a crime scene in different ways.
Answers
Answer:
a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.
at the defendant's trial for stealing an automobile, the defendant called a character witness who testified that the defendant had an excellent reputation for honesty. in rebuttal, the prosecutor calls another witness to testify that he recently saw the defendant cheat on a college examination. the prosecution witness's testimony should be
Answers
The prosecution witness's testimony should be:
The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
What do you mean by cross examination?
The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination. It gives the opposing party a chance to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.
The main aim of cross examination is to strengthen an individual's case. The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility
Rules of Cross-Examination
Asking Questions Only.Inclusion of New Fact Per Question.Break questions into a Series of Logical ProgressionsHence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
To know more about Cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28114975
#SPJ4
In 1942, German reserve police officers obeyed orders to kill some 1500 Jews in the village of Jozefow, Poland. This incident illustrated that people are most likely to be destructively obedient whenorders come from a source of authority
Answers
The German Reserve Police's Battalion 101 made their way into the Polish village of Jozefow in the early hours of July 13, 1942. in November 1943, resulting in an overall body count of 83,000 for a unit of less than 500 men.
They had just recently been drafted family men who were too old for combat service; they were workers, artisans, salesmen, and clerks; they had only been in Poland for less than three weeks. By dusk, they had rounded up Jozefow's 1,800 Jews, chosen a few hundred of them to be "labor Jews," and executed the remaining 1,500 women, children, and senior citizens. In pre-Hitler German Reserve Police's port city of Hamburg, the majority of these overage, rear-echelon reserve policemen had reached adulthood and were neither devoted Nazis nor racial extremists. However, these common men assisted in the combat direct shooting deaths of at least 38,000 Jews and the deportation of 45,000 more to Treblinka's gas chambers over the sixteen-month period from the Jozefow massacre to the brutal Erntefest ("harvest festival") slaughter .. Browning draws a grim conclusion by arguing that these honorable German Reserve Police's were acting less out of submission to authority or out of fear of punishment than they were out of two equally combat yet sinister motivations: careerism and peer pressure.
Learn more about German Reserve Police's here:
brainly.com/question/25976536
#SPJ4
Can ABC agents arrest an individual for criminal violations of the laws pertaining to alcoholic
beverages?
O a. No, they only investigate civil complaints
O b. No, they must work with local law enforcement to make an arrest
O c. No, they can only issue written warnings
Od. Yes, as they are sworn peace officers
E
Answers
Yes, ABC agents arrest an individual for criminal violations of the laws pertaining to alcoholic beverages: d. Yes, as they are sworn peace officers.
Who is an ABC agents?ABC agent are the agents whose role and responsibility is to prevent excessive drinking of alcohol or the abuse of alcohol beverage.
Hence, option D is correct because ABC Agents are sworn peace officers who help to conduct criminal investigation and to arrest those who violated alcohol beverage law.
Learn more about ABC agents here:https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answers
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
Senator Thompson has written a bill to increase government revenues. He is
currently persuading members of the Senate to pass his bill before moving
on to the House. Can he do this?
Answers
Answer:
No, Senator Thompson can not do this as all matters dealing with money must start in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Explanation:
The rule comes from the U.S. Consitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. If the bill was drafted in the U.S. House and passed the U.S. House Subcommittee, then passed by the full U.S. House, Senator Thompson could go around and ask other Senators to vote for the Bill, but he could not have written the Bill and have it start in the U.S. Senate.
One reason for the failure of SA
Answers
Answer:
visa regulations on impact SAA
based on the estates & trusts outline, if a man is married, has no children, has one living parent, and dies "intestate," the surviving wife will generally receive how much of the property that must go through "probate?"
Answers
Intestate Estate, Section 2-210 of the Uniform Probate Code (p. 27-28). Property passes according to intestacy laws if there is no will. Testators may make wills. According to the testator's or testatrix's desires, a will is said to have "gone through probate" when someone passes away intestate (without a will).
What is probate?The legal authority to manage someone's assets (their "estate") after their death is known as probate. Prior to obtaining probate, you shouldn't make any financial decisions or list any property for sale. If there is a will, the process of proving its validity and determining who is authorized to manage the decedent's inheritance is known as probate. The legal procedure known as "probate" is used to settle an estate or "prove" a will in court so that it is recognized as the true last bequest of the deceased.
What happens at probate court?Depending on the intricacy of the estate, court proceedings may or may not take place, but in many instances, the final hearing will be held in person so that the personal representative may present the probate case to the judge for approval. Sometimes the full procedure can be carried out remotely. For instance, some smaller estates in Alaska may be able to obtain the judge's consent by filing a sworn declaration rather than appearing in person at a hearing.
To know more about Probate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9859699
#SPJ4
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 states that its purpose, in part, is to require that real estate appraisals used in connection with federally related transactions be performed ______.
Answers
Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.
What exactly is the 1989 Enforcement Act?
The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:
Regulations to ensure that real estate appraisals are properly performed. This includes the need for complete and accurate documentation, as well as training for appraisers and their supervisors.The Resolution Trust Corp. was established temporarily to resolve the status of the nation's failed savings and loan institutions.The Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation was abolished, and two funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were established: the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to cover S&Ls, and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) to cover banks.The Federal Home Loan Bank Board was abolished, and two new agencies were established to replace it: the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14620330
#SPJ1
____________ protects law enforcement agents from being sued for damages unless they violate clearly established law which a reasonable official in the agent's position would have known.
Answers
Answer:
qualified immunity is the correct answer!!
Explanation:
Which passage from the Declaration of Independence reflects the
Enlightenment idea of the rule of law?
A. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
O B. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the
pursuit of Happiness.
C. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may
define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
D. These United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and
Independent States; ... they are Absolved from all Allegiance to
the British Crown, and ... all political connection between them
and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved.