Draw the pipeline diagram (on the next page) for the following programs. Please note whether it
is a multi cycle CPU or a single cycle CPU
Program 1
Given a Single Cycle CPU where each stage is fixed at 200 ps (a 1000ps clock cycle), draw the pipeline diagram for the program below data
num: .word 12 .text
la $s0, num
lw $t0, 0($s0)
addi $t1, $t0, 3
Program 2
Given a Multi Cycle CPU where each stage is fixed at 200 ps (a 1000ps clock cycle), draw thepipeline diagram for the program below data
num: .word 12
.text
la $s0, num
lw $t0, 0($s0)
addi $t1, $t0, 3
1. What is the total length of time to run Program 1?
2. What is the total length of time to run Program 2?
3. What hazards, if any, exist in Program 1?
4. What hazards, if any, exist in Program 2?

The unit price of the pairs of gloves is $6.39 per pair.

A unit rate is a rate that has a denominator of 1. It is a rate in which the second quantity in the comparison is 1 unit.

To find the unit price of the pairs of gloves, we need to divide the total cost by the number of pairs of gloves.

If 6 pairs of insulated gloves cost $38.34, then the cost of 1 pair of gloves is:

$38.34 ÷ 6 = $6.39 per pair

Hence, the unit price of the pairs of gloves is $6.39 per pair.

Read more about unit rate at

https://brainly.com/question/19493296

#SPJ1

The probability that the next report will weigh less than 45 grams = 0.106

In this question, we have been given the weight of written reports produced in a certain department has a normal distribution with mean 60 grams and standard deviation 12 grams.

We need to find the probability that the next report will weigh less than 45 grams.

We have mean= 60 grams

Standard Deviation = 12 grams

First we convert 45 to z score.

45 converted to z score for given mean and standard deviation will be:

z = (45 - 60)/12

z = -1.25

So, from standard normal table a P-value:

P(x<45) = 0.10565

Therefore, the probability would be 0.10565

Learn more about the probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

The number of oranges that are expected to weigh more than 4 oz is:

1400 - (1400 × 0.0228)≈ 1368.

The mean weight of the oranges growing in an orchard is 8 oz and standard deviation is 2 oz, the distribution of the weight of oranges can be represented as normal distribution.

From the batch of 1400 oranges, the number of oranges is expected to weigh more than 4 oz can be found using the formula for the Z-score of a given data point.

\(z = (x - μ) / σ\)

Wherez is the Z-score of the given data point x is the data point

μ is the mean weight of the oranges

σ is the standard deviation

Now, let's plug in the given values.

\(z = (4 - 8) / 2= -2\)

The area under the standard normal distribution curve to the left of a Z-score of -2 can be found using the standard normal distribution table. It is 0.0228. This means that 0.0228 of the oranges in the batch are expected to weigh less than 4 oz.

To know more about normal distribution  visit :

https://brainly.com/question/23418254

#SPJ11

(a) The variable educ might be endogenous

(b) The variable brthord is birth order (one for the first-born child, two for a second-born child and so on) could be used as an instrument for educ in equation

a) The variable instruction might be endogenous because as compensation increases the income expansions which additionally make able to an individual more educating himself. So there is an opportunity for the instruction might be an endogenous variable.

The indigeneity may involve the 32 the coefficient of knowledge as well different variables like married, black, south, urban, etc.

b) There is a substantial high relationship exists between birth order and the status of teaching. it is more possible to have higher schooling with less the order of child-born and the birth order is autonomous of the error term as well with wage. So the variable "birth order" is a good variable to use as an agency for the endogenous variable instruction.

Learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/31827960

#SPJ4

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

2+2+2 = 6*2 = 12*2 = 24

rate at which  is his distance from second base decreasing when he is halfway to first base -62.4ft/sec

When I see "at what rate", I know this question must come from

pre-Calculus, so I won't feel bad using a little Calculus to solve it.

-- The runner, first-base, and second-base form a right triangle.

   The right angle is at first-base.

-- One leg of the triangle is the line from first- to second-base.

  It's 90-ft long, and it doesn't change.

-- The other leg of the triangle is the line from the runner to first-base.

   Its length is  90-29T.  ('T' is the seconds since the runner left home plate.)

-- The hypotenuse of the right triangle is

        square root of [ 90² + (90-29T)² ] =

        square root of [ 8100 + 8100 - 4320T + 841 T² ] =

        square root of [ 841 T² - 5220T +16200  ]

We want to know how fast this distance is changing

when the runner is half-way to first base.

Before we figure out when that will be, we know that since

the question is asking about how fast this quantity is changing,

sooner or later we're going to need its derivative.  Let's bite the

bullet and do that now, so we won't have to worry about it.    

      Derivative of  [ 841 T² - 5220 T + 16,200 ] ^ 1/2 =

(1/2) [ 841 T² - 5220 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (1682T - 5220) .

There it is.  Ugly but manageable.

How fast is this quantity changing when the runner is halfway to first-base ?

Well, we need to know when that is ... how many seconds after he leaves

the plate.

Total time it takes him to reach first-base = (90 ft)/(29 ft/sec) = 3.10344 sec .

He's halfway there when   T = (3.10344 / 2) = 1.5517 seconds.  (Seems fast.)

Now all we have to do is plug in 1.5517 wherever we see 'T' in the big derivative,

and we'll know the rate at which that hypotenuse is changing at that time.

Here goes.  Take a deep breath:

(1/2) [ 841 T² - 5220 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (841T - 5220)  =

[ 841 T² - 5220 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (1152T - 8640)  =

[841(1.5517)² - 4320(1.55175) + 16,200]^-1/2 times [1152(1.5517)-8640] =

[    2,025      -  8,100  +  16,200 ] ^ -1/2  times   [ 2,160 - 8640 ]  =

- 6480 / √10,125  =   - 62.4 ft/sec.

learn more about of square here

https://brainly.com/question/748663

#SPJ4

Note that based on probabilities,

The expected number of Democrats on the committee is 5.

The expected number of states represented on the committee is 26.

The expected number of states such that both of the state's senators are on the committee is 9.09.

a)  The probability that a randomly chosen senator is a Democrat is 50/100 = 1/2.

So, the expected number of Democrats on a committee of size 10 is

1/2 * 10 = 5.

b) The minimum number of   states that can be represented on a committee of size 10 is 2, and the maximum numberis 50.

The expected number of states representedon the committee is the average of these two values, which is (2 + 50)/  2 = 26.

c)  There are 50 states, and each state has 2 senators. So, there are a total of 100 pairs of senators.

The probability that a randomly chosen pair of senators both belong to the same state is 50/100 * 49/99

= 1/11.

The expected number of states such that both of the state's senators are on the committee is 100 * 1/11 = 9.09.

Learn more about probability  at:

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is the third graph.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are looking for a constant balance, we should focus on the line in the graph. In graph 3, we see a line going straight horizontally, without any inclines or declines. Since the word "constant" in Mathematics is a line that has a slope of 0, the answer must be the third graph.

The value of k in the given arithmetic sequence is equal to 2

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of numbers such that the difference between the consecutive terms is constant.

The nth term of an arithmetic sequence is derived using; aₙ = a + (n - 1)d where a is the first term and d the common difference

Given the first term as 3k + 1, we have that;

a₁ = a + (1 - 1) d = 3k + 1

a₁ = a = 3k + 1

for the second term k, substituting 3k + 1 for a;

a₂ = 3k + 1 +(2 - 1)d = k

3k - k = -1 - d

2k = -1 - d...(1)

for the third term -3; substituting 3k + 1 for a;

a₃ = 3k + 1 +(3 - 1)d = -3

3k + 1 + 2d = -3

3k = -4 - 2d ...(2)

using elimination method to remove d, we multiply equation (1) by 2 to get;

4k = -2 - 2d...(3)

we subtract equation (2) from (3);

4k - 3k = -2 - 2d - (-4 - 2d)

k = -2 -2d + 4 + 2d {2d is eliminated}

k = 4 - 2

k = 2

Therefore, the value of k for the arithmetic sequence is equal to 2.

Know more about arithmetic sequence here:https://brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ1

The given statement "Measuring the entire population is usually preferred over measuring a sample from the population" is False because measuring the entire population is often impractical or impossible.

When dealing with large populations, it is typically more feasible to gather data from a representative sample rather than measuring the entire population. This approach saves time, resources, and effort. Sampling allows statisticians to make reliable inferences about the population based on the characteristics observed in the sample.

Carefully chosen samples can accurately reflect the population's attributes and provide valuable insights.

However, it is crucial to ensure that the sample is representative and unbiased to avoid potential sampling errors and ensure the validity of the conclusions drawn from the data.

For more questions like Population click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/27779235

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

All the factors of 12

So 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 are factors of 12.

Answer:

answer is 2×2×3×5= 4×15=60 im srry if you did not mean this but anyways have nice day

Step-by-step explanation:

12,10| 2

6,5| 2

3,5| 3

1,5| 5

1,1

The measure of angle x in the right triangle is approximately 14.6 degrees.

The figure in the image is that of two right angles.

First, we determine the hypotenuse of the left-right angle.

Angle θ = 30 degrees

Adjacent to angle θ = 10 cm

Hypotenuse = ?

Using the trigonometric ratio.

cosine = adjacent / hypotenuse

cos( 30 ) = 10 / hypotenuse

hypotenuse = 10 / cos( 30 )

hypotenuse = \(\frac{20\sqrt{3} }{3}\)

Using the hypotenuse to solve for x in the adjoining right triangle:

Angle x =?

Adjacent to angle x = \(\frac{20\sqrt{3} }{3}\)

Opposite to angle x = 3

Using the trigonometric ratio.

tan( x ) = opposite / adjacent

tan( x ) = 3 / \(\frac{20\sqrt{3} }{3}\)

tan (x ) = \(\frac{3\sqrt{3} }{20}\)

Take the tan inverse

x = tan⁻¹(  \(\frac{3\sqrt{3} }{20}\) )

x = 14.6 degrees

Therefore, angle x measures 14.6 degrees.

Learn more about trigonometric ratio here: brainly.com/question/28016662

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the coordinates of the ice cream store, we need to determine its position on the line connecting the grocery store and the restaurant.

First, we find the distance between the grocery store and the restaurant using the distance formula:

Distance = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

Distance = sqrt((7 - (-5))^2 + (3 - 12)^2)

= sqrt(12^2 + (-9)^2)

= sqrt(144 + 81)

= sqrt(225)

= 15

Next, we calculate 2/3 of the distance from the grocery store to the restaurant:

2/3 * 15 = 10

This means that the ice cream store is located 10 units from the grocery store along the same line.

To find the coordinates of the ice cream store, we start from the grocery store (-5, 12) and move 10 units in the direction towards the restaurant.

The x-coordinate of the ice cream store will be -5 + 10 = 5.

To find the y-coordinate, we calculate the vertical distance between the grocery store and the restaurant:

Vertical distance = 12 - 3 = 9

Since we're moving 10 units along this line, the y-coordinate of the ice cream store will be 12 - 9 = 3.

Therefore, the coordinates of the ice cream store are (5, 3).

To calculate the realized income, we need to consider the hourly wage, the number of hours worked, and the deductions.

Hourly wage: $8.25

Hours worked per week: 35

Number of weeks: 3

Total earnings before deductions:

Total hours worked = 35 hours/week * 3 weeks = 105 hours

Total earnings = Hourly wage * Total hours worked = $8.25/hour * 105 hours = $863.25

Now, let's calculate the deductions:

FICA (7.65%):

FICA deduction = Total earnings * FICA rate = $863.25 * 7.65% = $66.14

Federal withholding (13%):

Federal withholding deduction = Total earnings * Federal withholding rate = $863.25 * 13% = $112.23

State withholding (9%):

State withholding deduction = Total earnings * State withholding rate = $863.25 * 9% = $77.69

To calculate the realized income, subtract the total deductions from the total earnings:

Realized income = Total earnings - (FICA deduction + Federal withholding deduction + State withholding deduction)

Realized income = $863.25 - ($66.14 + $112.23 + $77.69) = $607.19

To learn more about wage : brainly.com/question/30141450

#SPJ11

Where is the question ???

The distance between the two planes after 4 hours is approximately 150 km.

to find out how far apart the planes are after 4 hours, we can use the concept of vectors.

Let's start by finding the positions of the two planes after 4 hours.

The first plane flies at a speed of 110 km/h in a direction of 280°. To find its position after 4 hours, we can use the formula: distance = speed × time. So, the distance traveled by the first plane is 110 km/h × 4 hours = 440 km.

To determine the position of the first plane, we need to convert the direction (280°) into components. The x-component is given by: cos(280°) × distance = cos(280°) × 440 km. The y-component is given by: sin(280°) × distance = sin(280°) × 440 km.

Similarly, for the second plane, which flies at a speed of 250 km/h in a direction of 200°, the distance traveled after 4 hours is 250 km/h × 4 hours = 1000 km. To determine its position, we need to convert the direction (200°) into components. The x-component is given by: cos(200°) × distance = cos(200°) × 1000 km. The y-component is given by: sin(200°) × distance = sin(200°) × 1000 km.

Now, let's calculate the x and y components for both planes:

For the first plane:
x-component = cos(280°) × 440 km
y-component = sin(280°) × 440 km

For the second plane:
x-component = cos(200°) × 1000 km
y-component = sin(200°) × 1000 km

the distance between the two planes, we can use the distance formula, which is given by: distance = √((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2), where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the positions of the first and second planes respectively.

Now, substitute the values we calculated into the distance formula:

distance = √((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)
distance = √((cos(200°) × 1000 km - cos(280°) × 440 km)^2 + (sin(200°) × 1000 km - sin(280°) × 440 km)^2)

After evaluating the above expression, the distance between the two planes after 4 hours is approximately 150 km.

Learn more about distance with the given link,

https://brainly.com/question/26550516

#SPJ11

Answer:

-0.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement “When an outcome falls outside the sample space, it is a failure” is ALWAYS TRUE. A sample space is defined as the set of all possible outcomes of an experiment. Therefore, any outcome that is not within the sample space cannot be an actual outcome of the experiment and is considered a failure.

In probability theory, the sample space is the set of all possible outcomes of a random experiment. Every outcome within the sample space has a non-zero probability of occurrence. If the outcome falls outside the sample space, it has a zero probability of occurring and is therefore considered a failure.For instance, consider an experiment of flipping a coin, where the sample space is {Heads, Tails}. If the outcome is “Side”, then it is not part of the sample space and is considered a failure. Similarly, if we throw a dice, then the sample space is {1,2,3,4,5,6}. Any outcome other than these six values, like 0 or 7, would be a failure because it falls outside of the sample space.Therefore, the statement “When an outcome falls outside the sample space, it is a failure” is always true.

For more question sample space

https://brainly.com/question/29719992

#SPJ8

The correct answer is: III only. Variance investigation is typically based on a cost-benefit analysis.

Statement I is incorrect because the relative size of a variance, in comparison to other variances, can be important in understanding its significance.

Statement II is incorrect because variance investigation does not focus solely on unfavorable variances. Both favorable and unfavorable variances are considered during the investigation.

Statement III is true. Variance investigation is typically based on a cost-benefit analysis, where the potential benefits of investigating and addressing variances are weighed against the associated costs.

Learn more about Variance  from

https://brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ11

We determine the cumulative weight retained at each sieve and then calculate the cumulative percentage passing by dividing the cumulative weight passing by the total weight of the sample and multiplying by 100.

To calculate the percentage passing for each sieve size in a sieve analysis, we need to determine the cumulative percentage passing at each sieve size.

The sieve analysis provides information about the particle size distribution of an aggregate sample. It involves passing the sample through a series of sieves with different mesh sizes, and measuring the amount of material retained on each sieve.

To calculate the percentage passing, we first need to determine the cumulative weight retained at each sieve size. This is done by subtracting the weight retained on a particular sieve from the weight retained on the previous sieve.

Once we have the cumulative weight retained, we can calculate the cumulative percentage passing by dividing the cumulative weight passing by the total weight of the sample and multiplying by 100.

Here is an example:

Sieve Size (mm) | Weight Retained (g)

4.75 | 50

2.36 | 30

1.18 | 20

0.6 | 15

0.3 | 10

0.15 | 5

To calculate the cumulative percentage passing:

Calculate the cumulative weight retained:

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 4.75 mm = 50 g

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 2.36 mm = 50 g + 30 g = 80 g

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 1.18 mm = 80 g + 20 g = 100 g

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 0.6 mm = 100 g + 15 g = 115 g

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 0.3 mm = 115 g + 10 g = 125 g

Cumulative weight retained at sieve 0.15 mm = 125 g + 5 g = 130 g

Calculate the cumulative percentage passing:

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 4.75 mm = (Total weight - Cumulative weight retained) / Total weight * 100 = (130 g - 50 g) / 130 g * 100 = 61.54%

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 2.36 mm = (130 g - 80 g) / 130 g * 100 = 38.46%

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 1.18 mm = (130 g - 100 g) / 130 g * 100 = 23.08%

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 0.6 mm = (130 g - 115 g) / 130 g * 100 = 11.54%

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 0.3 mm = (130 g - 125 g) / 130 g * 100 = 3.85%

Cumulative percentage passing at sieve 0.15 mm = (130 g - 130 g) / 130 g * 100 = 0%

Learn more about distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

A matrix is symmetric if it is equal to its transpose. Thus, a 3x3 matrix A is symmetric if and only if A = A^T, where A^T is the transpose of A.To determine the dimension of Sym(3), we simply count the number of basis vectors, which is 6. Therefore, dim[Sym(3)] = 6

Let's consider the set of all 3x3 symmetric matrices, denoted Sym(3). To find a basis for Sym(3), we can use the fact that a symmetric matrix has only 6 independent entries: the entries on the diagonal, and the entries above the diagonal (or below the diagonal, since the matrix is symmetric).

To construct a basis for Sym(3), we can consider the following matrices:

The matrix E_11, whose (1,1) entry is 1 and all other entries are 0.

The matrix E_12 = E_21, whose (1,2) and (2,1) entries are 1 and all other entries are 0.

The matrix E_13 = E_31, whose (1,3) and (3,1) entries are 1 and all other entries are 0.

The matrix E_22, whose (2,2) entry is 1 and all other entries are 0.

The matrix E_23 = E_32, whose (2,3) and (3,2) entries are 1 and all other entries are 0.

The matrix E_33, whose (3,3) entry is 1 and all other entries are 0.

It can be shown that any symmetric 3x3 matrix can be written as a linear combination of these matrices. Thus, they form a basis for Sym(3).

To determine the dimension of Sym(3), we simply count the number of basis vectors, which is 6. Therefore, dim[Sym(3)] = 6

Visit here to learn more about  matrix :  https://brainly.com/question/29132693
#SPJ11

The construction that uses the compass for only one step in addition to drawing the circle itself is A. an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle.

It should be noted that a compass simply means a device that's used to show cardinal directions. It's also used in mathematics to draw shapes.

In this case, the construction that uses the compass for only one step in addition to drawing the circle itself is an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle.

Learn more about compass on:

https://brainly.com/question/594583

#SPJ1

Answer:

39 inch

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

H=39.0625

Step-by-step explanation:

D=32in

R=1/2d=32/2=16

Volume of cylinder:pi r^2h

V=pir^2h

10000pi=16^2hpi

256h=10000

h=39.0625

Answer:

A. 10x+18=48

Step-by-step explanation:

She uses x eggs per cake, and she bakes 10 cakes. She has 18 eggs left over. So the product of the 10 cakes and the number of eggs she used for each cake, plus the 18 eggs left over will get you the ending answer of 48.

The simplified version of (sec a - cosec a) / (sec a + cosec a)  is cosec 2a(cosec 2a - 2) / (sec²a - cosec²a).

The study of correlations between triangles' side lengths and angles is known as trigonometry. The field was created in the Hellenistic era in the third century BC as a result of the use of geometry in astronomical research.

Given:

(sec a - cosec a) / (sec a + cosec a)

Multiply the numerator and denominator by (sec a - cosec a)

(sec a - cosec a) / (sec a + cosec a)  × (sec a - cosec a)

(sec²a + cosec²a -2sec a cosec a) / (sec²a - cosec²a)

As we know,

\(sec^2a + cosec^2a = sec^2a \ cosec^2a\)

sec² a cosec² a - 2sec a cosec a /  (sec²a - cosec²a)

sec a cosec a (sec a cosec a - 2) / (sec²a - cosec²a)

cosec 2a(cosec 2a - 2) / (sec²a - cosec²a)

To know more about trigonometry:

https://brainly.com/question/14272510

#SPJ1

The major portfolio strategies of this fund are investing in large-cap stocks and value stocks with high book-to-market ratios. The regression coefficients and p-values provide insights into the fund manager's investment strategy.

The coefficient of 0.4231 for the Large Cap asset class is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.0080, indicating a significant allocation to large-cap stocks. Additionally, the coefficient of 0.5531 for the High Book-to-Market (Value) asset class is also statistically significant with a p-value of 0.0013, indicating a significant allocation to value stocks with high book-to-market ratios.

These findings suggest that the fund manager focuses on investing in large-cap stocks and value stocks with high book-to-market ratios as part of their portfolio strategy.

Regarding the explanation of return variabilities, the R-square value of 0.3500 indicates that the asset allocation strategies explained 35% of the return variabilities in the fund. While this is a significant portion, it also implies that other factors not captured by the regression analysis contribute to the remaining 65% of return variabilities. Therefore, while the asset allocation strategies explain a substantial portion of return variabilities, other factors also play a role in determining the overall returns of the fund.

Learn more about large-cap stocks here: brainly.com/question/29458217

#SPJ11

By using the Chinese Remainder Theorem separate the statement into two congruences we have x(p-1)(q−1)+1 (mod pq) for all x € Z.

Under the condition that the divisors are pairwise coprime (no two divisors share a common factor other than 1), the Chinese remainder theorem states that if one knows the remainders of the Euclidean division of an integer n by several integers, then one can uniquely determine the remainder of the division of n by the product of these integers.

It suffices to show pq divides x(x(p-1)(q-1) - 1) for all x e Z. We consider three cases. Consider gcd (x, pq). It has 3 possibilities.

Case 1: If gcd(x, pq) 1. Then applying using Euler's Theorem we have

= x(pq) = 1 (mod pq)

= x(p-1)(−1) = 1 (mod pq)

= x(p-1)(q-1)+1 (mod pq)

and so the result holds if gcd(x, pq) = 1. EX

Case 2: If gcd(x, pq) p. This means x = 0 (mod p). In this case we have

= 0 = x (mod p).

Since gcd(x, pq) = p therefore qx and = 1 (mod q) by Fermat's Little Theorem. This gives us that x(p-1)(q-1)+1 so we have x9-1 x(p−1)(q−1) = 1 (mod q) = x(p-1)(q-1)+1 = x (mod q).

We have shown that x(p-1)(q-1)+1 = x (mod p) and x(p-1)(q-1)+1 = x (mod q). Using the Chinese Remainder Theorem we get x(p-1)(q−1)+1 = x (mod pq).

Case 3: If gcd(x, pq) = q. This case is same as Case 2, with p being replaced by q.

Thus we have extinguished all cases and we have shown x(p-1)(q−1)+1 (mod pq) for all x € Z.

Learn more about Chinese Remainder Theorem:

https://brainly.com/question/30811240

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Let р and q be distinct primes. Show that for all x € Z, we have the congruence x(p-1)(9–1)+1 x (mod pq). (Hint: Use the Chinese Remainder Theorem/Sun Ze's Theorem to separate the statement into two congruences.)

Answer:

\(\frac{224}{10}=22.4\\ \frac{5315}{10}=531.5\\\frac{3783}{100}=37.83\\ \frac{34502}{1000}=34.502\)

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the problem, we need to write each fraction in decimal form.

Notice that each denominator is 10 based, which means we only have to move the decimal point according to the total number of zeros have the denominators. If the denominator is 10, we move the decimal point one spot to the left, if the denominator is 1000, we move the decimal point three spots to the left, and so on.

\(\frac{224}{10}=22.4\\ \frac{5315}{10}=531.5\\\frac{3783}{100}=37.83\\ \frac{34502}{1000}=34.502\)