During the fifteenth century, the King of England created chancery courts to consider petitions of those who were in need of special aid intervention.
Chancery courts emerged as a response to the limitations of the common law system, which often failed to provide justice in certain cases. These courts operated under the principle of equity, focusing on fairness and ensuring that individuals received the help they needed.
Chancery courts played a vital role in addressing various issues, including matters involving land disputes, trusts, and wills. They also provided assistance to those who were financially vulnerable or in need of protection from injustice. By examining each case based on its unique circumstances, chancery courts were able to provide tailored remedies that the common law system could not offer.
While the dower system, houses of refuge, and poor laws were also important aspects of the social and legal landscape at the time, it was the chancery courts that directly addressed the petitions of individuals seeking special aid intervention. This innovative approach to justice allowed for a more compassionate and equitable legal system during the fifteenth century in England.
Learn more about Chancery courts here: https://brainly.com/question/30512545
#SPJ11
The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
foundational condition what is
Foundational condition is a part of the struc-ture that provides support to the ent-ire structure. It plays an imperative role in main-taining the stability of the structure on the gro-und.
The found-ation has to trans-mit load coming on the struc-ture direct-ly on to the ground. It pro-vides the segregation bet-ween the ground and the struct-ure. The conditions for lay-ing down the found-ation of the structure are as follows.
• The stre-ngth of the soil present on the ground must be en-ough to provide ample support to the structure with-out causing the structure to slip.
• The factor of compress-ibility of the soil should be high, because high-ly compressible soil will provide better st-ability to the structure.
To know more about foundation click below:
brainly.com/question/29566837
#SPJ4
Giao tiếp sư phạm đạt hiệu quả, người giáo viên cần lưu ý gì
Answer:
bus what languages not able to understand jio to Baramma that he looked another jio your Venum Kan Lulu gi
Should the UK ratify the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)?
Answer:a
Explanation:
Please explain the concept of the Burden of Proof? Please include how the Burden shifts throughout the proceedings.
Burden of proof is the obligation to provide evidence and prove a case, which may shift between parties in different stages.
In a court case, it is the burden of the party presenting the evidence to establish their case. First and foremost, it is the plaintiff's responsibility to prove their case through a preponderance of the available evidence. In criminal cases, it is the prosecution's responsibility to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However in some circumstances the burden might change.
For instance, when the plaintiff presents enough proof, the onus may shift to the defendant to offer a convincing counterargument. A fundamental principle known as the burden of proof requires that the party asserting a claim provide evidence to support it with the burden of proof potentially shifting at various points throughout the course of the proceedings.
Learn more about Burden of proof at:
brainly.com/question/30765922
#SPJ4
when interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when _______.
When interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when there are ambiguities or gaps in the language of the contract. This means that if the language of the contract is not clear or complete, the courts may need to fill in the gaps by looking at the context and circumstances surrounding the agreement.
When interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when there are ambiguities or gaps in the language of the contract. This means that if the language of the contract is not clear or complete, the courts may need to fill in the gaps by looking at the context and circumstances surrounding the agreement. For example, if the contract does not explicitly state a deadline for completion of a task, the court may look at the parties' past conduct, industry standards, or other factors to determine what a reasonable deadline would be. Ultimately, the goal of interpreting a contract is to give effect to the parties' intentions, even if those intentions are not explicitly stated in the contract itself. This is why it is important to be clear and thorough when drafting contracts, to avoid ambiguity and the need for judicial interpretation.
To know more about courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ11
according to the constitutional court what the value of African law
Answer:
Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms. Non-racialism and non-sexism. Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
_____ is a area of policy making that encompasses how one country builds relationships with other countries in order to safeguard its national interest.
Diplomacy is an area of policy-making that encompasses how one country builds relationships with other countries to safeguard its national interest.
Diplomacy is the practice of conducting negotiations and maintaining relations between nations. It is a crucial aspect of policy-making that involves managing international relations in order to protect and advance a country's national interest.
Diplomatic efforts can include various strategies such as engaging in bilateral or multilateral negotiations, signing treaties and agreements, participating in international organizations, and employing diplomatic tools like diplomacy, economic incentives, and cultural exchanges.
The goal of diplomacy is to establish mutually beneficial relationships with other countries, address conflicts or disputes, promote cooperation, and protect a country's political, economic, and security interests in the international arena. Diplomatic efforts are typically led by diplomats, ambassadors, and foreign affairs departments or ministries.
To learn more about Diplomacy click here brainly.com/question/7611874
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Why is it a good idea to have a carbon monoxide detector in the home?
A.
to prevent an allergic reaction
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
C.
to warn members of the household of smoke from a fire
Answer:
B.
to prevent poisoning from carbon monoxide
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Class or individual Evidence?
Evidence Example: A note was found at a crime scene. A notepad with a similar type of paper was found in the desk of a suspect. Is the note be individual or
class evidence to the pad of paper?
A) class evidence
B) individual evidence
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Individual characteristics can be identified as Individual characteristics can be identified as
having originated with a particular person or having originated with a particular person or
source
hope this helps
what is the document prepared by an attorney that states the attorney's opinion of the status of the title?
Answer:
A title report is issued by a title company based on the opinion provided by the attorney. An easement can be used in a variety of ways but is most commonly used to purchase property, research ownership, or verify a lien.
Please give the brainliest, really appreciated. Thank you
which of the following is an incorrect statement regarding a registration exemption under section 4(6) of the securities act of 1933?
The incorrect statement regarding a registration exemption under Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 is "The exemption is not available for investment companies."
Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 is commonly referred to as the Regulation D exemption. It enables issuers to sell securities without registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) if they meet certain conditions. It is also known as a private placement exemption because the securities are sold privately to accredited investors or a limited number of non-accredited investors.
Regulation D contains three answers, Rule 504, Rule 505, and Rule 506, which offer varying degrees of exemption from SEC registration. The exemption is available to all types of issuers, including operating companies and investment companies.
The incorrect statement regarding a registration exemption under Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 is that "The exemption is not available for investment companies." This statement is false because the exemption is available to all types of issuers, including operating companies and investment companies.
Learn more about the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): https://brainly.com/question/32030276
#SPJ11
Is building a system of public transportation for metropolitan areas a state or congress power?
Answer:
it is probably for the area of states cause most business workers transport from metropolitan so I think that's it
Explanation:
I'm new to this I hope your not disappointed thanks!!
can you all helping me
Answer:
5. Homicide. X assaulted Y, causing them to fall into the water and drown. This is homicide, even if unintentional.
6. Yes. B is an accessory to murdxr/raxe. It's called "accomplice liability."
NOTE: This is going to vary by region. I am also not a lawyer.
copyright law protects authored works such as art, books, and film.
Yes, that is correct. Copyright law provides protection for original works of authorship, including but not limited to literary, musical, dramatic, and artistic works.
This protection grants the author the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, and create derivative works based on their original work. The purpose of copyright law is to encourage creativity and innovation by providing authors with the legal tools to control the use and distribution of their works. It is important to respect copyright law and obtain permission or a license before using someone else's copyrighted material.
To learn more about protection
https://brainly.com/question/29987482
#SPJ11
A group unhappy with the draft distributes a memo to members encouraging physical confrontations with draft agents. The leaders of the group are promptly arrested. Which of the following Supreme Court cases best justifies the actions taken by law enforcement in this scenario?
A. Schneck v. US
B. Wisconson v. Yoder
C. Mapp v. OH
D. Brandenburg v. OH
a corporate vice president is convicted of attempting to bribe a presidential aide in order to gain a valuable government contract is called white collar crime. True or false?
It is TRUE that a corporate vice president is convicted of attempting to bribe a presidential aide in order to gain a valuable government contract is called white collar crime.
The scenario described, where a corporate vice president is convicted of attempting to bribe a presidential aide to gain a valuable government contract, falls under the category of white collar crime. White collar crime refers to non-violent offenses typically committed by individuals or organizations in professional or business settings. These crimes are characterized by deceit, fraud, or violation of trust for financial or economic gain. Examples include bribery, embezzlement, fraud, insider trading, and money laundering. The described situation involves an illicit attempt to gain a business advantage through bribery, which is a form of white collar crime often associated with corruption in corporate or political spheres.
To know more about white collar crime
brainly.com/question/1573032
#SPJ11
A crowbar is found at a crime scene. The crowbar has the potential to contain the suspect's fingerprints and/or DNA on the handle, the victim's blood/DNA on the weapon, and trace evidence from the victim's shirt on the one of the crowbar's end fissures. To which lab units should the crowbar be submitted? Mark all that apply. a. firearms and tool marks b. DNA analysis c. trace evidence unit d. latent print unit
True or false for top. will thumbs up if done correct
70. In general, a drawer can stop payment of a certified or cashier's check.
71. Certification of a check must be written on the check and must be signed by an agent of the bank.
72. An indorser's conditional liability is discharged if a check is not presented for payment within three days after the date the indorser signed the check.
Answer: 70 t
71 t
72 f
Explanation:
Why is constitution fundamental law of the land
Explanation:
The law is important for a society for it serves as a norm of conduct for citizens. It was also made to provide for proper guidelines and order upon the behaviour for all citizens and to sustain the equity on the three branches of the government. It keeps the society running. Without law there would be chaos and it would be survival of the fittest and everyman for himself. Not an ideal lifestyle for most part.
The law is important because it acts as a guideline as to what is accepted in society. Without it there would be conflicts between social groups and communities. It is pivotal that we follow them. The law allows for easy adoption to changes that occur in the society.
Answer:
One of the major innovations that the American Founders brought to constitutional thought was their conception of a constitution as a written, fundamental law the supreme “law of the land” that defines the organization of government and serves as the ruling principle for the proper exercise of power by legislators
Explanation:
What is the definition of a municipality?
a division of government directly below the state level
a city department charged with enforcing local laws
a city, town, or village with its own government
a set of laws and policies for a county
Generally speaking, a municipality is a single administrative entity having corporate status and the power to govern itself in accordance with local, state, and federal laws.
What does the municipality do?A municipality is essentially the state government's answer to the demand for specific public services (such as trash disposal, police and fire protection, water supply, and health care) beyond what the county or other local governments in the area are able to provide.
What qualities does a municipality have?A municipality must have at least one of the following qualities: a unique geographical region. an extremely public persona. formal structure.
To know more about municipality visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30190342
#SPJ1
Answer:
C. a city, town, or village with its own government
Explanation:
Got it right on Edge quiz
"The reason the FCC can regulate cable is because it uses the spectrum to broadcast its signals, just as broadcasting does"
"The motive the FCC can regulate cable is that it uses the spectrum to broadcast its alerts, just as broadcasting does". false
Consequently, AT&T net has nothing to do with Spectrum in the meanwhile and is a totally unique entity. permit's check some of the maximum popular plans provided by using Spectrum at reasonable charges.
The Spectrum television App is a cellular utility that lets you watch live tv and On-demand content material at no extra price from your cellular tool. you may also tune in your DVR, timetable recordings, browse the channel guide, search for content, and find out about your preferred shows, and extra!
Each Verizon Fios and Spectrum are well worth thinking about if they may be to be had in your place. Fios has the threshold in relation to the fiber-optic net, fast upload and download speeds, and occasional costs. then again, Spectrum excels in relation to sizable geographic availability and carrier in rural areas
Learn more about Spectrum here: https://brainly.com/question/25847009
#SPJ4
An accident occurs between a truck and a family vehicle. The truck is owned by a corporation with businesses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The truck driver is from Ohio. The corporation is incorporated in Delaware but is headquartered in Pennsylvania. The family members in the vehicle include a grandmother domiciled in New Jersey and a mother and daughter domiciled in Connecticut. The accident occurs in New York. The family sues the corporation.
Is there federal jurisdiction?
What states have jurisdiction? (Assume that subject matter jurisdiction requires the incident or the residents of all defendants to be in the state of suit. )
The United States of America is a federal republic made up of 50 states, a federal district (Washington, D.C., the nation's capital), five major territories, and numerous minor islands.
The states, as well as the United States as a whole, are both sovereign jurisdictions. Any state, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any American territory falls under the jurisdiction of the United States. England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are the three legal jurisdictions of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
any one pls give me a gogle play gift card of 25 pls?
Answer:
k
Explanation:
Explanation:
sorry I can't. I'm broke
should the wisconsin constitution be amended to require a nonpartisan system for redistricting legislative and congressional districts in the state?
The Wisconsin Constitution should be amended to require a nonpartisan system for redistricting legislative and congressional districts in the state.
A nonpartisan system for redistricting could help address issues such as gerrymandering and political bias, promoting fairness in the electoral process. Some potential benefits of amending the Wisconsin Constitution to require a nonpartisan redistricting system are:
1. Enhanced fairness: By reducing political influence in the redistricting process, a nonpartisan system could help ensure that district boundaries are drawn more fairly and accurately represent the population.
2. Increased competitiveness: Nonpartisan redistricting can promote more competitive elections by reducing the likelihood of politically manipulated districts that favor one party over another.
3. Improved public trust: A nonpartisan redistricting system may increase public trust in the electoral process by removing the perception of political bias in district boundaries.
4. Better representation: By removing political influence from redistricting, a nonpartisan system may lead to more representative districts that better reflect the political preferences of the population.
Ultimately, the decision to amend the Wisconsin Constitution for this purpose depends on the values and priorities of the citizens of the state, as well as the political climate and potential legal implications of such an amendment.
Know more about the Wisconsin Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/31062405
#SPJ11
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th amendment?.
Based on the data, the conclusion which can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment is that, The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
What is the 19th Amendment?
On June 4, 1919, the Congress approved the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and on August 18, 1920, it was ratified. Women now have the right to vote thanks to the 19th Amendment. Women began to demand the right to vote in the middle of the 19th century through protests, petitions, and acts of civil disobedience, but it took them decades to succeed.
For American women, reaching this milestone was challenging since it required a protracted and challenging battle, but it was a win. The right to vote for women in America is thus legally guaranteed by the 19th amendment.
The 19th Amendment had a significant impact on the rising number of votes cast by American women, according to the data. Even decades after American women were granted the right to vote, their number of votes has continued rising and they now outnumber men.
To know more about 19th Amendment refer:
https://brainly.com/question/9822287
#SPJ4
Disclaimer- The complete question is-
Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment?
The high percentage of women voters has had a political impact.
Despite the opportunity to vote, women do not vote as often as men
Despite the ability to vote, women register in lower numbers than men.
The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.
Question 1 of 10
Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft,
coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of
choice?
A. Capital
B. Profits
C. Resources
D. Wages
Hello and Good Morning/Afternoon
Original Question: Which of the following is necessary in addition to protection against theft, coercion, and fraud in order for consumers and producers to have freedom of choice?
Let's consider all the choices:
Capital: is a financial asset usually given to help start a company or invest in a company. This doesn't protect against theft, fraud, or coercion as its purpose is to help start not to protect a companyProfits: it is the money made by the company. However, that doesn't protect a company as it only makes a company more vulnerable to theft as dishonest people will find the company more attractive to take advantage of.Resources: by having resources, the companies have ways to evade criminals as they have ways and connections to use their profit and capital and their workers to move past the dangerWages: is the payment made to the workers for their service. This doesn't protect the company as its purpose is to only pay their workers for their service, not to protect the company.Answer: Resources
Hope that helps!
#LearnwithBrainly
Diana and Steve opened a convenience store in a neighborhood where several burglaries occurred recently. To protect their business, they decided to install a high-tech security camera and burglar alarm. Which method have Diana and Steve chosen to handle risk to their business?
The risk management technique can be described as the technique that Diane and Steve have taken to be able to manage their business.
What is the risk management technique?Techniques for managing hazards, or risk management. Traditional risk management methods for dealing with event risks include risk retention, contractual or noninsurance risk transfer, risk control, risk avoidance, and insurance transfer.
Different strategies include the use of financial instruments like hedges, swaps, and futures to manage other forms of risk (such as operational, interest rate, and credit risks).
the act of determining and assessing loss exposures and adopting measures to reduce the risks they pose in order to minimize financial damage.
Read more on risk management here: https://brainly.com/question/16781966
#SPJ1
Which crime is BEST represented by the following situation? Dagan sneaks into an event center through an unlocked window to steal valuable items on display for an event the next day.
Answer:
Theft
Explanation:
which best paraphrases this excerpt? being self-executing, this law would be easy to enforce because it would not require lawmakers to change any current laws. the amendment would automatically repeal any state or federal laws in conflict with it after a year; no legislative action would be needed. the amendment would become effective one year after the date of its ratification; no further legal action would be necessary. ratifying the amendment would give state and federal legislatures an opportunity to change prejudicial laws within one year.
Answer:
The best paraphrase of this excerpt is "The law is self-executing, meaning that it can be enforced easily and without the need for lawmakers to change any existing laws. Within a year of its ratification, the amendment would automatically repeal any state or federal laws that conflict with it, without requiring legislative action."
Explanation:
The original excerpt explains the process by which a self-executing law would be enforced, and how it would automatically repeal any conflicting laws without requiring further legislative action. The paraphrase accurately conveys this information in a slightly different way, using simpler language and clearer syntax. The paraphrase emphasizes the self-executing nature of the law, and highlights the fact that no legislative action would be required to enforce it. Additionally, the paraphrase clearly states that the amendment would automatically repeal any conflicting laws within a year of its ratification.