Elena went 60 meters in 50 seconds. Noah went 50 meters in 10 seconds. Elena and Noah both moved at a constant speed. Who went faster? Explain your reasoning.

if RD is 12cm so AR is 12cm too... since the R is placed in the middle and we can analyze too that the AD is 24cm since RD is 12cm and AR is 12cm so...

12+12=24

AR= 12cm

Hope it helps...

Answer:

(u + \(\frac{65}{2}\) )²

Step-by-step explanation:

u² + 65u

to complete the square

add ( half the coefficient of the u- term )²

= u² + 2(\(\frac{65}{2}\) )u + \(\frac{4225}{4}\)

= (u + \(\frac{65}{2}\) )²

Answer:

yeah I would say deal #1 is better

Answer:

a). Rate = 6

b). Starting value = 12

c). y = 6x + 12

Step-by-step explanation:

From the table attached,

a). Rate of the function = slope of the function

                                      = \(\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}\)

   Where \((x_1,y_1)\) and \((x_2,y_2)\) are the points through which the function is passing.

Let the two points from the table are (-2, 0) and (-1, 6),

Rate = \(\frac{6-0}{-1+2}\) = 6

b). Starting value of the function = y-intercept = 12

  (Since, y-intercept means y-value at x = 0)

c). Since, slope intercept form of the linear function is,

   y = mx + b

   y = 6x + 12

Answer:

3 pages per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the number of pages and divide by the time

1 1/2 ÷ 1/2

Write the mixed number as an improper fraction

3/2÷1/2

Copy dot flip

3/2 * 2/1

3

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  3 pages per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the number of pages per hour, divide pages by hours.

  (1.5 pages)/(0.5 hours) = 3 pages/hour

The distance it will take to drive from Toronto to buffalo (distance between Toronto and buffalo is 154km) is 1.75 hours.

We are given that;

distance = 154 km speed = 88 km/hr

Now,

we need to use the formula:

time = distance / speed

where time is in hours, distance is in kilometers, and speed is in kilometers per hour.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

time = 154 / 88 time ≈ 1.75

Therefore, by speed the answer will be 1.75 hours.

Learn more about speed here;

https://brainly.com/question/7359669

#SPJ1

A function assigns the values. The number of people that were recruited in year 6 is 192.

A function assigns the value of each element of one set to the other specific element of another set.

Given that the number of people per year is represented by the function \(f(t)=3(2)^t\).

In the given function, t represents the number of years.

Now, the number of people that were recruited in year 6 can be calculated by putting the value of t as 6 in the given function,

\(f(t)=3(2)^t\)

f(6) = 3(2)⁶

     = 3(64)

     = 192

Hence, the number of people that were recruited in year 6 is 192.

Learn more about Function here:

https://brainly.com/question/5245372

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is t represents the year number; 192 people were recruited in year 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

7+15/5

Answer:

10

Step-by-step explanation:

subsitute

7+15/5=10

Answer:

\(2\frac{17}{62}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

5.64 : 2.48

2.82 : 1.24

1.41 : 0.62

\(\frac{1.41}{0.62}=\\\\\frac{141}{62}=\\\\2\frac{17}{62}\)

Answer:

sorry  i dont know them all

2. The equation of a line in slope-intercept form is y=mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Note the y-intercept occurs when x=0 or at the point (0,b). Step 2. Substituting m=-5 and b=2, we have y=-5x+2.

Answer:

a)  $497.70

b)  392.4 square feet

c)  $1,200

Step-by-step explanation:

A regular octagon has 8 sides of equal length.

Given each side of the octagon measures 9 feet in length, and one side does not have a railing, the total length of the railing is 7 times the length of one side:

\(\textsf{Total length of railing}=\sf 7 \times 9\; ft=63\;ft\)

If the railing sells for $7.90 per foot, the total cost of the railing can be calculated by multiplying the total length by the cost per foot:

\(\textsf{Total cost of railing}=\sf 63\;ft \times \dfrac{\$7.90}{ft}=\$497.70\)

Therefore, the cost of the railing is $497.70.

\(\hrulefill\)

To find the area of the regular octagonal gazebo, given the side length and apothem, we can use the area of a regular polygon formula:

\(\boxed{\begin{minipage}{6cm}\underline{Area of a regular polygon}\\\\$A=\dfrac{n\;s\;a}{2}$\\\\where:\\\phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $n$ is the number of sides.\\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $s$ is the length of one side.\\ \phantom{ww}$\bullet$ $a$ is the apothem.\\\end{minipage}}\)

Substitute n = 8, s = 9, and a = 10.9 into the formula and solve for A:

\(\begin{aligned}\textsf{Area of the gazebo}&=\sf \dfrac{8 \times 9\:ft \times10.9\:ft}{2}\\\\&=\sf \dfrac{784.8\;ft^2}{2}\\\\&=\sf 392.4\; \sf ft^2\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the area of the gazebo is 392.4 square feet.

\(\hrulefill\)

To calculate the cost of the gazebo's flooring if it costs $3 square foot, multiply the area of the gazebo found in part (b) by the cost per square foot:

\(\begin{aligned}\textsf{Total cost of flooring}&=\sf 392.4\; ft^2 \times \dfrac{\$3}{ft^2}\\&=\sf \$1177.2\\&=\sf \$1200\; (nearest\;hundred\;dollars)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the cost of the gazebo's flooring to the nearest hundred dollars is $1,200.

a. To find the perimeter of the gazebo, we can use the formula P = 8s, where s is the length of one side. Substituting s = 9, we get:

P = 8s = 8(9) = 72 feet

Since one side is open, we only need to find the cost of railing for 7 sides. Multiplying the perimeter by 7, we get:

Cost = 7P($7.90/foot) = 7(72 feet)($7.90/foot) = $4,939.20

Therefore, the cost of the railing is $4,939.20.

b. To find the area of the gazebo, we can use the formula A = (1/2)ap, where a is the apothem and p is the perimeter. Substituting a = 10.9 and p = 72, we get:

A = (1/2)(10.9)(72) = 394.56 square feet

Therefore, the area of the gazebo is 394.56 square feet.

c. To find the cost of the flooring, we need to multiply the area by the cost per square foot. Substituting A = 394.56 and the cost per square foot as $3, we get:

Cost = A($3/square foot) = 394.56($3/square foot) = $1,183.68

Rounding to the nearest hundred dollars, the cost of the flooring is $1,184. Therefore, the cost of the gazebo's flooring is $1,184.

#SPJ1

Answer:

The probability that none of the LED light bulbs are​ defective is 0.7374.

Step-by-step explanation:

The complete question is:

What is the probability that none of the LED light bulbs are​ defective?

Solution:

Let the random variable X represent the number of defective LED light bulbs.

The probability of a LED light bulb being defective is, P (X) = p = 0.03.

A random sample of n = 10 LED light bulbs is selected.

The event of a specific LED light bulb being defective is independent of the other bulbs.

The random variable X thus follows a Binomial distribution with parameters n = 10 and p = 0.03.

The probability mass function of X is:

\(P(X=x)={10\choose x}(0.03)^{x}(1-0.03)^{10-x};\ x=0,1,2,3...\)

Compute the probability that none of the LED light bulbs are​ defective as follows:

\(P(X=0)={10\choose 0}(0.03)^{0}(1-0.03)^{10-0}\)

                \(=1\times 1\times 0.737424\\=0.737424\\\approx 0.7374\)

Thus, the probability that none of the LED light bulbs are​ defective is 0.7374.

Step-by-step explanation:

154 is my answer thank you

Answer: 3963.33$/month     914.62$/week         1829.23$/biweek

Step-by-step explanation: First, to find the monthly earnings, you would divide 47,560 by 12, which would be 3963.33333333... or 3963.33$. To find his weekly earnings, you would have to divide by all the weeks of the year, so you would divide 47,560 by 52. That would equate to 914.615384615 or 914.62$.

Assuming that bi-weekly is once every 2 weeks, it would be the weekly value x2, so it would be 1829.23076923 or 1829.23$.

Monthly earning is $3,963.33

Weekly earning is $914.62

Bi-weekly earning is  $1,829.23

Given :

Otis has a salary of $47,560 per year,

There are 12 months in a year. For 12 months the salary is $47,560

To find out monthly earning. we divide the yearly earning by 12

\(\frac{47560 }{12} \\3,963.33\)

Monthly earning is $3,963.33

In a year, there are 52 weeks . Biweekly we have 26 months

To find out biweekly earning , we divide the salary by 26

\(\frac{47,560 }{26} \\1,829.23\)

He earn Bi-weekly $1,829.23

In a year, there are 52 weeks , to find out weekly earning , we divide the salary by 52

\(\frac{47,560}{52} \\914.62\)

weekly earning is $914.62

Learn more :  brainly.com/question/1942583

Answer:

-5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

-0.5555555555 repeating = -5/9

Answer:

-5/9

Step-by-step explanation:

5 divided by 9 equals 0.5555

Answer:

110

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the perimeter of 1 fence.

55/2 or \(27\frac{1}{2}\)

Multiply by the number of fences (4)

110

I hope this helps!

The answer choice which is not a step in finding the area of the unknown figure is; Plug all dimensions into the formula: SA=Ixwxh. option B

It follows from the task content that all other steps except Plugging all dimensions into the formula; SA = l×w×h are correct steps.

This is due to the fact that, the formula does not work for all shapes and hence, it can't be generalized for all situations.

The step which is not involved in finding the area of an unknown figure is; Plug all dimensions into the formula: SA=Ixwxh.

Read more on area of shapes;

https://brainly.com/question/25965491

#SPJ1

Answer:

B) Plug all dimensions into the formula: SA=Ixwxh.

Step-by-step explanation:

$420+$350+$432=kelsey's monthly expenses  

$700+$800=Micheal's Monthly expenses

Michael's average monthly expenses are $750.

The average value in a set of numbers is the middle value, calculated by dividing the total of all the values by the number of values. When we need to find the average of a set of data, we add up all the values and then divide this total by the number of values.

Given that, Kelsey spent $350 in May, $432 in June and $420 in July.

Now, average monthly expenses are

(350+432+420)/3

= 1202/3

= 400.67

Michael spent $700 in April and May and $800 in June and July.

Here, (700×2+800×2)/4

= (1400+1600)/4

= 3000/4

= $750

Therefore, Michael's average monthly expenses are $750.

To learn more about an average visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11195029.

#SPJ2

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

This is correct because 0.1 or 0.10 is greater than 0.03

Here are the correct matches to the expressions to their solutions.

The GCF of 28 and 60 is 4.

(-3/8)+(-5/8) = -4/4 = -1.

-1/6 DIVIDED BY 1/2 = -1/6 X 2 = -1/3.

The solution of 0.5 x = -1 is x = -2.

The solution of 1/2 m = 0 is m = 0.

-4 + 5/3 = -11/3.

-2 1/3 - 4 2/3 = -10/3.

4 is not a solution of -4 < x.

1. The GCF of 28 and 60 is 4.

The greatest common factor (GCF) of two numbers is the largest number that is a factor of both numbers. To find the GCF of 28 and 60, we can factor each number completely:

28 = 2 x 2 x 7

60 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5

The factors that are common to both numbers are 2 and 2. The GCF of 28 and 60 is 2 x 2 = 4.

2. (-3/8)+(-5/8) = -1.

To add two fractions, we need to have a common denominator. The common denominator of 8/8 and 5/8 is 8. So, (-3/8)+(-5/8) = (-3 + (-5))/8 = -8/8 = -1.

3. -1/6 DIVIDED BY 1/2 = -1/3.

To divide by a fraction, we can multiply by the reciprocal of the fraction. The reciprocal of 1/2 is 2/1. So, -1/6 DIVIDED BY 1/2 = -1/6 x 2/1 = -2/6 = -1/3.

4. The solution of 0.5 x = -1 is x = -2.

To solve an equation, we can isolate the variable on one side of the equation and then solve for the variable. In this case, we can isolate x by dividing both sides of the equation by 0.5. This gives us x = -1 / 0.5 = -2.

5. The solution of 1 m = 0 is m = 0.

To solve an equation, we can isolate the variable on one side of the equation and then solve for the variable. In this case, we can isolate m by dividing both sides of the equation by 1. This gives us m = 0 / 1 = 0.

6. -4 + 5/3 = -11/3.

To add a fraction and a whole number, we can convert the whole number to a fraction with the same denominator as the fraction. In this case, we can convert -4 to -4/3. So, -4 + 5/3 = -4/3 + 5/3 = -11/3.

7. -2 1/3 - 4 2/3 = -10/3.

To subtract two fractions, we need to have a common denominator. The common denominator of 1/3 and 2/3 is 3. So, -2 1/3 - 4 2/3 = (-2 + (-4))/3 = -6/3 = -10/3.

8. 4 is not a solution of -4 < x.

The inequality -4 < x means that x must be greater than -4. The number 4 is not greater than -4, so it is not a solution of the inequality.

For more such questions on GCF

https://brainly.com/question/902408

#SPJ8

The x-intercepts of the graph of f(x) are x = 3/2 and x = 1,the Vertex of the graph of f(x) is (5/4, 3/8), and it is a minimum point, The vertex is at (5/4, 3/8). This is the minimum point of the graph.

Part A: To find the x-intercepts of the graph of f(x), we set f(x) equal to zero and solve for x.

2x^2 - 5x + 3 = 0

To factor this quadratic equation, we look for two numbers that multiply to give 3 (the coefficient of the constant term) and add up to -5 (the coefficient of the linear term). These numbers are -3 and -1.

2x^2 - 3x - 2x + 3 = 0

x(2x - 3) - 1(2x - 3) = 0

(2x - 3)(x - 1) = 0

Setting each factor equal to zero, we get:

2x - 3 = 0   -->   x = 3/2

x - 1 = 0   -->   x = 1

Therefore, the x-intercepts of the graph of f(x) are x = 3/2 and x = 1.

Part B: To determine whether the vertex of the graph of f(x) is a maximum or a minimum, we look at the coefficient of the x^2 term, which is positive (2 in this case). A positive coefficient indicates that the parabola opens upwards, so the vertex will be a minimum.

To find the coordinates of the vertex, we can use the formula x = -b/2a. In the equation f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x + 3, the coefficient of the x term is -5, and the coefficient of the x^2 term is 2.

x = -(-5) / (2*2) = 5/4

Substituting this value of x back into the equation, we can find the y-coordinate:

f(5/4) = 2(5/4)^2 - 5(5/4) + 3 = 25/8 - 25/4 + 3 = 3/8

Therefore, the vertex of the graph of f(x) is (5/4, 3/8), and it is a minimum point.

Part C: To graph f(x), we can use the information obtained in Part A and Part B.

- The x-intercepts are x = 3/2 and x = 1. These are the points where the graph intersects the x-axis.

- The vertex is at (5/4, 3/8). This is the minimum point of the graph.

We can plot these points on a coordinate plane and draw a smooth curve passing through the x-intercepts and the vertex. Since the coefficient of the x^2 term is positive, the parabola opens upwards, and the graph will be concave up.

Additionally, we can consider the symmetry of the graph. Since the coefficient of the linear term is -5, the line of symmetry is given by x = -(-5) / (2*2) = 5/4, which is the x-coordinate of the vertex. The graph will be symmetric with respect to this line.

By connecting the plotted points and sketching the curve smoothly, we can accurately graph the function f(x).

For more such questions on Vertex .

https://brainly.com/question/28747454

#SPJ8

The value of x is 1.75 and y is 5. The solution is obtained using properties of congruent triangles.

What is a congruent triangle?

Two triangles that are congruent will have precisely the same three sides and three angles.

The dimensions of the triangles' sides and angles determine whether two or more triangles are congruent. A triangle's size is determined by its three sides, and its shape by its three angles. Pairs of corresponding sides and corresponding angles in two triangles are said to be equal if they are congruent. They share a similar size and shape. In triangles, there are numerous congruence conditions.

The triangles are congruent by SAS congruency because

AC = CD (Given)

∠ACB = ∠DCE ( Vertically opposite angles)

BC = CE  (Given)

Thus, Triangle ABC ≅ Triangle DEC

Since, the triangles are congruent, therefore

⇒AC = CD

⇒4y-6 = 2x+6   ...(1)

Also, BC = CE

⇒3y+1 = 4x

⇒(3y+1)/4 = x    ...(2)

Now, substituting the value of x in (1), we get,

⇒4y-6 = 2(3y+1)/4+(6)

⇒4y-6 = (6y+2 +24)/4

⇒16y-24 = 6y+2 +24

⇒10y = 50

⇒y = 5

Now putting the value of y in (2), we get

⇒(3(2)+1)/4 = x

⇒7/4 = x

⇒ x = 1.75

Hence, the value of x is 1.75 and y is 5.

Learn more about congruent triangle from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/29789999

#SPJ1

The midpoint of AB is M(-4,2). If the coordinates of A are (-7,3), and the coordinates of B is (-1, 1).

To find the coordinates of point B, we can use the midpoint formula, which states that the coordinates of the midpoint between two points (A and B) can be found by averaging the corresponding coordinates.

Let's denote the coordinates of point A as (x1, y1) and the coordinates of point B as (x2, y2). The midpoint M is given as (-4, 2).

Using the midpoint formula, we can set up the following equations:

(x1 + x2) / 2 = -4

(y1 + y2) / 2 = 2

Substituting the coordinates of point A (-7, 3), we have:

(-7 + x2) / 2 = -4

(3 + y2) / 2 = 2

Simplifying the equations:

-7 + x2 = -8

3 + y2 = 4

Solving for x2 and y2:

x2 = -8 + 7 = -1

y2 = 4 - 3 = 1

Therefore, the coordinates of point B are (-1, 1).

Know more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/29765572

#SPJ8

answer

13

step my step explanation

hoped this help

Answer:

7 1/3 servings

Step-by-step explanation:

0.75x=5.5

x=5.5÷0.75

x=7.33333

 -or-

7 1/3 servings

Answer:

Let the value of house before increase be 'x'.

Rate of growth = 7%

So, Amount of growth would be

\(=\dfrac{7}{100}\times x\\\\=0.07x\)

So, Value of house after increase becomes

\(\begin{gathered}x+0.07x\\\\=1.07x\end{gathered}\)

Since Value of house after increase

= $ 749000

it becomes,

\(\begin{gathered}1.07x=749000\\\\x=\dfrac{749000}{1.07}\\\\x=700000\end{gathered}\)

─━─━─━─━─━─━─━─━─━─━─━─

\(\Large\mathcal\red{Similar\:Question :}\)

The value of zlatan's house has increased by 7%. His house is now valued at £749000 work out the value of the house befo...

https://brainly.com/question/11361577

─━─━─━─

At the start of 2014 lucys house was worth ?200 000. The value of the house increased by 5% every year. Workout the valu...

https://brainly.com/question/12046186

Area is length x width:

4x^3y^2 x 3x^2y^3

Apply the exponent rule: a^b x a^c = a^(b+c)

4 x 3 = 12

x^3 x x^2 = x^5

y^2 x y^3 = y^5

Combine for final answer: 12x^5y^5

The reasonable estimate would be 25

We have to solve this using the rule of 3

9 out of 30 members said that they run more than 5 days a week.

We will form the equations

when 9 ran = 30 menbers

when n ran = 84 members

we will then cross multiply

84 x 9 = 30 x n

n = 25.2

When we round this, the reasonable estimate would be 25

Read miore on survey here:https://brainly.com/question/25257437

#SPJ1

Complete question

Freemont Run Club surveyed a random sample of 30 of their members about their running habits. Of the members surveyed, 9 said that they run more than 5 days a week.

There are 84 Freemont Run Club members.

Based on the data, what is the most reasonable estimate for the number of Freemont Run Club members who run more than 5 days a week?

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

There is no 2x in D answer