Essay: Response to Helen Keller's Autobiography

Evaluating literature is an important skill. It involves much more than saying "this is good!" or "I don't like this book." There are three steps to evaluating a text. First, figure out the author's purpose. Second, determine whether or not he achieved that purpose. Third, support your determination with examples. For this project, you'll complete a literary response to Chapter IV of Helen Keller's The Story of My Life.

Objectives

Evaluate an autobiography.
Write a composition of at least 250 words.
Instructions:

You know that an autobiography's purpose is two-fold:

First: The author shows the reader what happened to her and how it shaped her outlook on life.
Second: The author convinces the reader that her outlook is worth knowing about.
You have identified Helen Keller's purpose; now you must decide whether you think she achieved it and support your decision with examples. To do this you will:

Reread Helen Keller’s autobiography.
Write a composition of at least 250 words:
Explain why or why not Chapter IV of Helen Keller's The Story of My Life helps to achieve the two-part purpose of an autobiography.
Give at least two examples of why the chapter does or does not achieve the purpose.

Answer:

Explanation:

The prohibition of the sale of cigarettes and alcohol during the lockdown can be understood in two following reasons.

The primary aim of the prohibition of the sale of cigarettes and alcohol during the lockdown is to reduce the number of C ovid19 cases so that hospitals and clinics can treat the patients successfully and efficiently.

The prohibition of the sale cigarettes and alcohol has truly reduced the chances of C ovid19 cases although no exact statistic can be determined. It is a precautionary measure that governments have undertaken as they pose higher risk than any other activities.

Answer: (D) To create a story with more than one main character.

Explanation: A third-person narrator is a type of narrator who tells the story from outside the perspective of any of the characters. A third-person narrator can be omniscient, meaning that they know everything about the characters and the events, or limited, meaning that they only know what one or a few characters know. A third-person narrator can also be objective, meaning that they only report what happens without any commentary or interpretation, or subjective, meaning that they express their own opinions or judgments about the story.

One of the reasons why an author might choose to use a third-person narrator is to create a story with more than one main character. A third-person narrator can switch between different characters’ points of view and show their thoughts, feelings, actions, and interactions. This way, the author can develop multiple characters and plotlines, explore different themes and perspectives, and create a more complex and realistic story. For example, in George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series, each chapter is told from the point of view of a different character, allowing the author to create a vast and intricate world with many characters and conflicts.

However, using a third-person narrator also has some drawbacks. For instance, a third-person narrator may create more distance between the readers and the characters, making it harder for the readers to empathize or identify with them. A third-person narrator may also confuse or overwhelm the readers if there are too many characters or shifts in perspective. A third-person narrator may also lose some of the intimacy and immediacy that a first-person or second-person narrator can provide. Therefore, an author needs to consider the purpose and effect of using a third-person narrator before choosing this type of narration.

Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)

An author might choose to use a third-person narrator for several reasons:

1. To show the thoughts and feelings of multiple characters: By using a third-person narrator, the author can provide insights into the thoughts and emotions of different characters. This allows the reader to gain a deeper understanding of various perspectives within the story.

2. To maintain an objective point of view: Third-person narration provides a more objective viewpoint compared to first-person narration. It allows the author to present events and characters in a balanced manner, without bias or limited knowledge.

3. To create a sense of detachment or distance: Third-person narration can create a sense of distance between the reader and the characters. This can be effective when the author wants to explore themes or ideas from a more detached perspective.

4. To provide a broader scope: Using a third-person narrator allows the author to depict a wider range of events, locations, and characters. This can result in a more comprehensive and expansive story, as the reader is exposed to different perspectives and storylines.

Explanation:

It's important to note that while these are common reasons why an author might choose a third-person narrator, there can be other creative and unique motivations behind this choice. Ultimately, the author's decision depends on the specific goals and intentions they have for their story.

The sentence that does not belong in this example paragraph is this:

D. It's no Pipeline or Teahupoo, though, which may well be the world's two greatest waves.

The point of the is that although there are not many great premier surf spots in the United States, there are some notable ones. In the following text, we learn about some of these surfing spots that are regarded as notable by virtue of their nature and waves.

The sentence that does not belong in the example paragraph is the fourth sentence that says that Seaside Oregon is no Pipeline or Teahupoo whicha re the world's greatest waves. This statement was made after saying that Seaside Oregon compares with some of the greatest surf spots in the world. So, there is a conflict that makes the statement odd.

Learn more about The Pacific Coast of the United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/22902451

#SPJ1

Mrs. Fitzgerald counsels Mrs. Pearson to refrain from compromising again with her fellow members of her family.

Annie was given the advice to not be sentimental by Mrs. Fitzgerald. She supplied advice in accordance with Annie's kind character because she was fully aware of it. Mrs. Pearson acknowledged that because she loved her family so much, it would be difficult to remove them. She was aware of their thoughtlessness and selfishness but believed they may not have wanted to be. Fitzgerald has a lot of knowledge and intelligence. She acquired something esoteric power in the eastern region, which she knows.

Learn more about Fitzgerald, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15193963

#SPJ1

When a patient is unable to afford the oral therapy copayment, one of the options that can be investigated is option(A)- patient assistance program.

Patient assistance programs are initiatives provided by pharmaceutical companies, non-profit organizations, or government agencies to assist patients in obtaining medications they need but cannot afford.

These programs typically offer financial assistance or discounted medications to eligible patients based on their income, insurance coverage, or specific medical conditions.

Patient assistance programs help bridge the gap between the cost of medications and a patient's ability to pay, making essential treatments more accessible. They may require the patient to meet certain criteria, provide documentation, or apply through a healthcare provider.

Options B, C, and D are not directly related to addressing the affordability issue of copayment. Sample medications are typically limited and may not be a sustainable solution for long-term therapy. Supply from clinical trials is generally reserved for participants of specific trials and may not be applicable to all patients. Medication stock nearing expiry does not address the affordability aspect but rather focuses on utilizing soon-to-expire medications.

Therefore, option A- patient assistance program is the most appropriate option to explore when a patient is unable to afford the oral therapy copayment.

For more questions on oral therapy, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/4620593

#SPJ8

Answer:c-an unamed narrator describes events

Explanation:I never read this story, but based on what I just read, the passage is using personal pronouns, which means it should be an answer that connects with the text, hence the answer would be an answer that describes and connects with the text.

basically saying that this is expressing text to test, first person, etc.

so it should have an answer that corresponds to the text!

Answer:

There's a man that lives in a small town with a fond of pets. He has pup, two kittens, a parrotand a monkey. Among all his pets, the monkey is his best friend that he spends more time with it. The monkey enjoys his company and will present itself for service whenever the man needs him. Once the man taking a nap, the monkey fanning at him when a fly comes and sit on man's nose. Then, the monkey chase it but the fly changes the place but doesn't leave the man. The monkey got tired of chasing and gets angry. The monkey thinks that he will teach it a lesson. Suddenly the monkey goes in and comes out with a sword and sees the fly was sitting on man's chest. Out of sudden, the monkey attacks the fly with swords but the fly flies and the man get seriously injured. So, moral of the story is whenever you get angry don't made a decision without thinking wisely.

Answer:

Cite your sources

Explanation:

Answer:

proper, common, common, proper, proper, common, (I can't see 7), common, proper, common, proper, proper, common, proper.

Answer:ness’es master is nice and he favored ness among the other slaves so that’s why he gives him that privilege

Explanation:

Answer:

D is the right answer.

Explanation:

Ped is the Roman Suffix for "limbs" or "legs." a

Also, Cent is the Roman Prefix meaning "one hundred."

Answer:

Ob

Explanation:

Oa shows the adjective unhappy which is used to describe the girl. Oc shows the adjectives extremely and hot which are used to describe the summer. Od shows the adjective beautiful which describes the mother. After all of this, Ob is the only possible answer

Answer: Ob

Explanation: An adjective DESCRIBES A NOUN. The two nouns in this sentence are 'boy' and 'house'. Neither of those things are given any further description.

Answer:

Explanation:

n

A runner takes part in a race just as an activist takes part in a movement

A rhetorical tool known as an analogy is employed to elucidate or simplify a concept by likening it to a recognizable subject.

This analogy cleverly illustrates the similarities between a racer competing in a competition and a social activist participating in a cause. The comparison proposes that there are commonalities between the functions and deeds of the athlete and the advocate.

Similar to how a runner exerts energy in a race, aiming to cross the finish line, an activist puts forth effort in a movement, aiming to accomplish their objectives or initiate societal transformation.

The analogy effectively compares the committed and hands-on participation of both the athlete and the social advocate in pursuing their goals.

Read more about analogy here:

https://brainly.com/question/8846894

#SPJ1

“Time Capsule Found on the Dead Planet” informs readers to the perils of climate change and its eventual ramifications for the earth and humanity.

Even though it turned out to be untrue—inside, scholars discovered Civil War artifacts, a Bible, and other old documents—the time capsule garnered increasing amounts of media and public interest leading up to its release.

The author underlines the regret that people felt over losing their money by structuring the poem as a flashback to past times. The poet illustrates how old the dead planet is by arranging the poem according to ages.

Thus, “Time Capsule Found on the Dead Planet” informs readers to the perils of climate change and its eventual ramifications.

For more information about discovered in time capsule, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/26090987

#SPJ1

Answer:

I saw goliath when i went to zoo last week

Explanation:

I guess it is!!!

Answer:

The National Geographic Society uses revenue from the magazine to fund expeditions and give grants to scientists for further research.

Answer:

c. absenteeism

Explanation:

I believe you are only asking for the answer on the first black since there are no choices for the second blank.

In order to know the answer, you have to check for "context clues." The second clause on the second sentence gives you an idea what the answer is on the first blank. It talks about students' not missing school. Missing school refers to being absent in class and this is connected to the word "absenteeism." The sentence means that a four-day week will allow students to move their schedule on Friday, in case they have special appointments that need to be done on a weekday. This will prevent them from being absent in class.

Answer:

do a close reading then annotate

Answer:

Answer:

D. ...Man,if there were one time I would actually want to cheat on a test, this might be it...​

Explanation:

The only sentence that relays any form of irony is answer D. B and C are just statements that the narrator made to carry on the story. A is a piece of internal dialogue, but it is not irony and it does not bring anything humorous to the story. Therefore, the only option left is D.

Answer: collide or explode

Explanation:

Most space debris is created when the satellites collide or explode. The collision or the explosion of the satellites results in the creation of space junks.

It should be noted that the collision of two satellites results in the smashing of the satellites into several pieces, which then results in the creation of debris.

Answer:

A country called "Fast Food Nation" is called that because it eats a lot of fast food. Eric Schlosser's book isn't just about fast food. It also talks about how it affects society in the United States and other countries now that it's been around for so long, and how it affects people there. These facts by Schlosser have had an impact on not just the people who read them, but also the whole world. After years of research and analysis, his facts are based on the truth. They are so well-researched that no reader will have any doubts about fast food companies or their policies after reading them.

When "Fast Food Nation" came out in 2001, it was a big hit. You might want to put the fries on hold after you read "Fast Food Nation." The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania published an article in their online business analysis journal, Knowledge at Wharton, about why. This article used statistics from "Fast Food Nation" to support their argument that we should all try to eat less fast food. Soon after, The Guardian wrote a summary of Eric Schlosser's book "Fast Food Nation." People read this article because it sums up his main ideas and presents them in a way that shows "the painful truth about fast food." This helps people understand the book better. Both of these papers agree with Schosser's idea that fast food is bad for us and that we should not eat it.

Eric Schlosser talked about his book with PR Watch in 2006. Obesity, children, and fast-food public relations were his main points of interest. He discusses obesity and how fast food has impacted it in America. One of his main themes is that unhealthy fast food has made it easier for kids to gain weight. Public relations have helped fast food restaurants attract children. According to Schlosser, sights and colors may entice children to try new things. This interview and his book will make anyone who reads them want to improve their parenting skills.

As we've shown, the problem is global, but the majority of fast-food chains are American, and they started here. In 2009, Schlosser spoke to PBS about "the state of the American food system." In this interview, he discusses the impact of his narrative on the fast-food industry and the American fast-food industry as a whole. Years later, Schlosser spoke to the Daily Beast about "In Still a Fast-Food Nation: Eric Schlosser Reflects on 10 Years Later." Now more than ever, Schlosser argues, people should read his book and learn about the terrible consequences of fast food on our lives.

"Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser was relevant in 2001. It was still relevant in 2022 and will be in 2100. The fast-food industry harms our collective health. We should try to remember all the facts in "Fast Food Nation" for the next time we pass a fast-food joint.

Explanation:

Change some words to avoid plagiarism. :)

The underlined parts in the given sentences are causes in sentences 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10, and effects in sentences 3, 5, and 9.

In the given sentences, we need to identify whether the underlined part is a cause or an effect. Let's go through each sentence one by one:

1. Cause - Sneezing is the cause that leads to the effect of blowing bacteria into the air.

2. Cause - Climbing over the fence is the cause that leads to the effect of Jack ripping his jeans.

3. Effect - The fact that the bottle is empty is the effect, which leads to the action of throwing it in the garbage.

4. Cause - Needing a new muffler is the cause that led to the effect of the car being in the shop.

5. Effect - Rain is the cause that leads to the effect of the school yard getting flooded.

6. Cause - Tripping over the rock is the cause that leads to the effect of hurting the knee.

7. Cause - Robbing the grocery store is the cause that led to the effect of the police arresting the thief.

8. Cause - Having friends over is the cause that led to the effect of Janice helping clean the house.

9. Effect - The fact that there was a hole in the bag is the cause that leads to the effect of the M&Ms spilling over.

10. Cause - Sparky getting hit by a car is the cause that led to the effect of Mom taking him to the vet.

For more such questions on effect

https://brainly.com/question/25680753

#SPJ8

Answer: The person is a do-nothing person

Explanation:

It's different when they don't do it that one time but if its constantly then they just don't like doing anything or thier too lazy.

The word pair "French / language" represents a language-nationality relationship. In this context, "French" refers to the nationality or origin of the language, while "language" indicates the specific subject of discussion.

Language-nationality relationships are common when discussing different languages and the countries or cultures associated with them. This relationship highlights the connection between a particular language and the people who speak it.

French is an example of a Romance language that originated in France and is spoken by millions of people worldwide. It is closely associated with French culture, history, and the people of France. Therefore, when we refer to the "French language," we are indicating the specific linguistic system used by French speakers.

Understanding different word relationships, such as language-nationality relationships, helps us comprehend the context and associations between words. It enables effective communication and helps us recognize the diversity and interconnectedness of languages and cultures.

For more questions on: context

https://brainly.com/question/20572253

#SPJ8    

The letter to the editor, showing my disapproval with the speeches is given below:

Dear Editor,

I am writing to express my disagreement with the recent speech advocating for the e r e ction of a statue honoring the pioneers. While I understand the desire to celebrate our history, I believe that this proposal is misguided and potentially harmful.

The claim that this statue would honor the pioneers ignores the fact that the pioneers were responsible for the displacement and mistreatment of Indigenous peoples. Erecting a statue in their honor would be insensitive and disrespectful to those who were harmed by their actions. Furthermore, it would perpetuate a false and harmful narrative that erases the experiences and contributions of Indigenous peoples.

A possible counterclaim is that the pioneers played a significant role in shaping our nation's history and should be celebrated for their accomplishments. However, I would argue that this celebration should not come at the expense of ignoring the harm they caused. Instead, we should acknowledge and learn from our history, including the mistakes and injustices committed by those who came before us. A more appropriate way to honor the pioneers would be to support efforts to promote understanding and reconciliation with Indigenous communities.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

Read more about letters here:

https://brainly.com/question/26430877

#SPJ1

Answer:

additionally

Explanation:

The narrator's perception of the worst part of his circumstance is captured in the second underlined sentence.

To Learn more About narrator's refer To:

https://brainly.com/question/20038946

#SPJ1