Everette is the warden at a large correctional facility. He is giving an interview for local reporters. One asks Everette what the most important goal of his job is. What would MOST likely be Everette's reply?

The most important goal is to keep the prison secure.
The most important goal is to teach the prisoners new skills.
The most important goal is to give families access to the inmates.
The most important goal is to save money for the state.

Answer:

The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:

They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.

It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.

A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.

The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.

The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.

A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.

https://brainly.com/question/32247683

#SPJ12

Answer:In some states, the trial court and the appellate court may conduct some pretrial activities for more important cases. For example, the trial court may conduct a pretrial conference or a hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence. The appellate court may conduct a pre-argument conference to discuss the issues and arguments in an appeal before the oral argument.

Explanation:

Answer:

Your picture is unclear

Option D. The government of the United States provides all of the functions apart from Private Property Ownership.

The government of the nation is usually elected by the people. The people elect them based on the trusts they have that the government would be able to help to meet their basic needs.

These needs are seen in the need for security, their economic needs and also to carry out leadership roles in the nation that would cause it to achieve growth.

This is the term that is used to refer to the properties that are owned by the non government entities in the society. The properties can be owned by the citizens of the nation as well as corporations and other organizations that are outside the government. The government is not responsible for providing these functions or providing such properties for the people.

Read more on the functions of the government here: https://brainly.com/question/17656622

#SPJ1

Answer:

I've heard of someone that was doing jury duty for a man who stole 3 packs of toilet paper from a local Walmart and he tried putting himself in the person's shoes and thinking of the reasons he would have needed/ wanted that toilet paper. Maybe his family was in desperate need, you never know someone's intentions behind something. It shows that to keep an open mind during a jury, you have to look at the reasons why the person did what they did. For example, if someone stole a $50,000 car, that's a different story. Not only will they be charged for theft, but they stole something worth much, much more than 3 packs of toilet paper, which is about $30.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps!

In order to keep an open mind and truly presume the defendant is innocent at the start of the trial, a juror has to be sure that the defendant will be innocent until the time his guilt has been proven with strong backing of evidences.

As per the rules mentioned under law, no one can presume that a defendant, or a person accused of a criminal activity, as a person with guilty mind, until the time his or her guilt has been proven in the court of law. Moreover, his guilt needs to be proven by evidences.

As a member of the jury, it is the duty and responsibility of a juror to keep an open mind regarding the presence of guilt in the minds of the defendant. An accused can never be sentenced or judged on the basis of the accusations made against him or her.

Therefore, the significance of keeping an open mind regarding the innocence of a defendant at the start of the trial has been aforementioned.

Learn more about a defendant here:

https://brainly.com/question/14167307

#SPJ2

Answer:

I have read online that it is a Chief.

Explanation:

Answer:

it is a III

Explanation:

i am a police officer and i have had to take this quiz before

Answer:

 The FitnessGram™ Pacer Test is a multistage aerobic capacity test that progressively gets more difficult as it continues. The 20 meter pacer test will begin in 30 seconds. Line up at the start. The running speed starts slowly, but gets faster each minute after you hear this signal. Ding  A single lap should be completed each time you hear this sound. Ding  Remember to run in a straight line, and run as long as possible. The second time you fail to complete a lap before the sound, your test is over. The test will begin on the word start. On your mark, get ready, ding  

Answer:

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Explanation:

pros

creates a sense of local patriotism

provides a better level of stability from a political perspective

It encourages involvement

It lessens the bureaucracy.

cons

It creates confusion.

It encourages governments to “pass the buck.”

It stops national policies from being implemented.

It causes uncertainty.

This one depends on your pov

It creates a wealth gap.

Answer:

prevent , identify and control are the three answers

Explanation:

It is what it is

Successful safety and health programs identify hazards and control methods.

Proactive in nature, successful safety and health programs seek to identify potential hazards in the workplace. They identify potential dangers to workers and guests through methodical hazard assessments and risk analyses. To identify any potential risks these programs thoroughly examine the working environment, work procedures, equipment and materials. Effective control methods are implemented to reduce risks and create a safer working environment after hazards have been identified.

Engineering controls, administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE) are examples of control measures. The ongoing effectiveness of the controls put in place is guaranteed by routine evaluation and monitoring. These programs promote a safer workplace, safeguard employees and lower the risk of accidents and injuries by diligently addressing hazards and putting control strategies into place.

learn more about personal protective equipment here

brainly.com/question/32468648

#SPJ3

Answer:

They Work 8 hours a day

Explanation:

trust me

Phyllis files a case in federal court after exhausting all administrative options, and the court will respect the agency's judgment on both legal and factual issues by upholding it unless it is clearly arbitrary.

Arbitrariness-or-capriciousness and substantial evidence are the two standards of review that the APA established for courts evaluating the conduct of administrative agencies.

The process through which courts assess the decisions made by the three branches of the government—the legislative, executive, and administrative branches—is known as judicial review. It also establishes if such activities are compliant with the nation's constitution.

In all areas of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, and other employment perks, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) forbids discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. Policies that restrict or forbid women from working just because they are expecting or of childbearing age are forbidden under this law.

Learn more about Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA): https://brainly.com/question/10692857

#SPJ4

It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime is NOT a criticism of labeling theory. The complete question is c.

One of the main criticisms of labeling theory is that it frequently ignores the structural causes of crime and deviance. Labeling theory is not without its detractors. The underlying societal factors that contribute to deviance may not be sufficiently addressed by labeling theory which focuses on the social process of labeling people as deviant and how this labeling can contribute to further deviant behavior.

Higher rates of crime and deviance can be attributed to structural factors like poverty, inequality and a lack of opportunities. Critics contend that labeling theory overemphasizes individual-level processes and inadequately takes into account the larger social and economic forces that influence deviant behavior. To develop a thorough understanding of deviance and crime, it is crucial to take into account how structural and labeling factors interact.

learn more about labeling theory here

brainly.com/question/31329812

#SPJ2

The complete question is- Which of the following is a criticism of labeling theory? Select one:

a. It doesn't explain impulsive crimes triggered by rage or fear.

b. It doesn't explain why people are deviant before labeling occurs.

c. It ignores structural factors that create or reinforce deviance and crime. d. It doesn't explain why crime rates have declined since 2000 despite poverty.

e. It doesn't explain how labeling increases deviant behavior.

Answer:      The United Nations (UN) was created at the end of World War II as an international peacekeeping organization and a forum for resolving conflicts between nations. The UN replaced the ineffective League of Nations, which had failed to prevent the outbreak of the Second World War. we could have Spoke up for what we care about, Volunteer or donate to a global organization, Choose fair trade & ethically made gifts, Listen to others' stories, Stay connected with social movements, Stand up against discrimination.

Explanation:

Why do you think the Allied forces chose to consolidate into the United Nations at the end of WWII? I think the Allied forces chose to consolidate into the United Nations at the end of WWII because they want to help decese violent movements like War, mass murder, or genocide from forming again. It was like protection. Can you think of another way they could have protected human rights around the world? No, I can't think of another way, I feel like this way was a good choice that affect us in the long wrong. 

Adverse possession is a method of obtaining land without the consent of the owner by taking possession of the land in an open and hostile manner for a specified period of time. When a person adversely possesses property, the owner may lose the title to that property.

The loss of title due to adverse possession happens when a person meets certain requirements such as the possession of the property for a specified period of time and doing so in a hostile manner. Adverse possession has been an established principle in common law for a long time. A person can only claim adverse possession against the legal owner of the property.

To claim adverse possession, a person must fulfill the following requirements:

Continuous and uninterrupted possession of the property:

The person must occupy the property for a specified number of years. The length of time required varies depending on the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is located.Open and notorious possession: The person must possess the property openly and notoriously for a specified period of time. This means that the person must use the property as if they were the owner of the property, such as using the property for farming purposes, putting up fences, or using the property for other uses that an owner would use it for.

Hostile possession: The person must possess the property without the permission of the owner. In other words, the person must be using the property without the owner's consent. The person must have no relationship with the owner that would give them permission to use the property.

Exclusive possession: The person must possess the property exclusively. This means that the person must be the only person using the property and not sharing it with anyone else. If the owner has given permission to others to use the property, then the person cannot claim adverse possession. Because of the nature of adverse possession, the owner may not be aware of the adverse possession taking place.

When an owner loses title to property due to adverse possession, it is often because they were not aware that someone was using their property without their permission. Therefore, it is important for owners to monitor their property to ensure that adverse possession does not take place.

Know more about Adverse possession here:

https://brainly.com/question/32382399

#SPJ8

Based on that information, individuals who were born between June 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, would be older than you.

Whether or not you should listen to people older than you or those around the same age as you is subjective and depends on various factors such as their knowledge, experiences, and the context of the situation. Age alone does not necessarily determine who you should or shouldn't listen to. It's important to consider a person's expertise, wisdom, and the value of their advice or opinions rather than solely focusing on their age.

Therefore,  individuals born between January 1, 2005, and December 30, 2005, would be the same age as you during the year 2005.

For more details regarding older people, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8023834

#SPJ1

Answer:

yes and no

Explanation:

might aswell mark brainliest as well ;)

1. We can see here that the case of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. involved: The State of New Jersey and T.L.O.

2. It is clear that the Supreme Court of the United States actually addressed the subject of students' Fourth Amendment rights against irrational searches and seizures in the landmark case of New Jersey v. T.L.O.

3. We can point out that the New Jersey Superior Court, the lower court, had found in the state's favor, concluding that the search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook was appropriate in the circumstances.

We can actually defined a legal issue as a disagreement that exists between the parties in a case that has a specific legal topic that needs to be decided by a court or other legal body.

4. We can see that in the New Jersey v. T.L.O., the legal question was actually citing whether school employees' search of T.L.O.'s purse violated the Fourth Amendment's ban on unjustified searches and seizures.

5. We see that the main arguments raised in the case was whether the search of T.L.O.'s purse qualified as a Fourth Amendment reasonable search.

6. We can point out that The Fourth Amendment's safeguards do not apply the same manner in schools as they do in other circumstances, according to the Supreme Court's prior finding in the case of Ingraham v. Wright, which was referenced in support of its reasoning.

Learn more about legal issues on https://brainly.com/question/30663289

#SPJ1

Answer:

Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone and Ida B. Wells

 Blood alcohol levels at autopsy are valid up to 48 hours after death if simple principles are observed in the collection and storage of samples.

The BAC of a deceased person can be inaccurate due to post-mortem alcohol production. The body metabolizes alcohol after death, making it hard to determine the BAC accurately.

Alcohol absorption varies with food and other substances, making BAC unreliable if consumed prior to death. Alcohol distribution can vary due to factors like body temperature and composition, impacting BAC testing.

Learn more about BAC of a dead body? from

https://brainly.com/question/6465834

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think C or 3 for the judge sentence and b or 2 for the restricted for a month

Explanation:

it was just a guess if you have a good feeling go with it

because she wants to

Answer: By the trigger guard

Explanation:

A good way to pick up a firearm to preserve evidence is by the trigger guard.

The trigger guard in a firearm is simply the protective loop that can be seen surrounding the firearm's trigger. This is vital in order to preserve evidence as unwanted contacts can be blocked.

Answer:

the house speaker

Explanation:

Answer:

Acceptance

Explanation:

The example of the results of the Supreme Court decision that was quickly overturned by a Constitutional Amendment was “separate but equal” facilities. Thus, option first is correct.

When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional question, its decision is nearly irrevocable; only the seldom used method of constitutional amendment or a fresh ruling by the Court can change it.

In the 1954 case of Brown v. Board of Education, for example, the Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. It overturned the previous judgement in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had established the concept of "separate but equal" facilities.

"Separate but equal" facilities were an example of the outcomes of a Supreme Court ruling that was shortly repealed by a Constitutional Amendment. As a result, option first is correct.

Learn more about Supreme Court here:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ1

Answer: B. Associate Degree

Explanation: College (a four-year program of study) or an associate's degree at a community college (usually a two-year program of study). Community colleges also offer certificate programs, which are usually completed in less than one year if attended full time.

Answer:

thanks for the points btw its b

Explanation:

Answer:

there will be people that try to kill u or get u in trouble

Explanation: