The role of precinct chair now involves being in the precinct planning. assisting in the planning of party activities. coordinating and serving as the precinct convention's leader.
In politics, the party chair serves as the party's chief executive. Political parties as much as countries vary in the type and significance of the position.
A party leader's responsibilities are frequently very different from those of a party chairman. The chairman's responsibilities usually center on the party's membership as a whole and its organizational activities. Chairmen frequently play significant roles in member recruitment and retention efforts, fundraising for political campaigns, and internal party governance, where they may sit on or even chair governing boards or councils. They frequently also have a say in choosing candidates, and occasionally even in creating and implementing party policy.
To learn more about precinct chair please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/29545296
#SPJ4
Specify the effect of an unrecorded deed of trust on the legal rights of (a) the lender/beneficiary against the property owner/borrower; AND of (b) the lender/beneficiary against any subsequent lenders or lienholders of the same property owner/borrower.
An unrecorded deed of trust affects the legal rights of the lender/beneficiary and subsequent lenders/lienholders differently.
In regards to the property owner/borrower, an unrecorded deed of trust still creates a valid lien on the property, meaning the lender/beneficiary can still enforce their right to foreclose on the property in the event of default. However, without recording the deed of trust, subsequent lenders or lienholders may not have notice of the first lien and could unintentionally take priority over the unrecorded deed of trust. Therefore, it is important for lenders to record their deeds of trust to ensure their priority and protect their legal rights against any subsequent lenders or lienholders.
For more about unrecorded deed:
https://brainly.com/question/31143589
#SPJ11
In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act, which required states to retrofit public areas to be wheelchair accessible, without offering any federal funds to pay for it. This is an example of which of the following?
Correct Answer(s)
-an unfunded mandate
-federal preemption
-coercive federalism
Incorrect Answer(s)
-a categorical grant
-a block grant
The Americans with Disabilities Act prevents discrimination and guarantees job opportunities for people with disabilities. It is an example of coercive federalism.
In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted into law. A civil rights statute known as the Americans with Disabilities Act forbids discrimination against people with disabilities in all aspects of social life, including employment, education, transport, and all governmental and private locations that are accessible to the general public. Making sure that people with disability have the same opportunities and rights as everyone else is the goal of the legislation. A phase of American federalism known as coercive federalism started in the late 1960s. It is distinguished by a significant increase in the federal government's power in comparison to the states, as well as by the federal government's ability to supersede state authority and impose federal policies on the states. In spite of the fact that cooperative and the dual federalism are still present in the federal system, the phrase refers to the predominate pattern of federal-state relations, particularly in terms of policymaking.
Learn more about coercive federalism here
https://brainly.com/question/28902846
#SPJ4
which president signed a bill allowing female attorneys to argue cases before the supreme court?
President Rutherford B. Hayes signed a bill allowing female attorneys to argue cases before the supreme court
President Rutherford B. Hayes was unable to establish a Civil Service Commission due to opposition from several members of his own party. In February 1879, he approved a law permitting female attorneys to present arguments before the US Supreme Court. Belva Lockwood appeared in Kaiser v. Stickney, 102 U.S. 176 in November 1880 to become the first woman to argue before the Supreme Court (1880). Although Sandra Day O'Connor will always be remembered as the country's first female Supreme Court justice, her influence extends well beyond that. O'Connor was born on March 26, 1930, in El Paso, Texas. She was raised on the Lazy B, an Arizona ranch owned by her family.
Know more about President Rutherford B. Hayes at: https://brainly.com/question/28243297
#SPJ4
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
What is report of traffic accident occurring in California SR 1?
Report of traffic accidents occurring in California SR 1 is California State University Maritime Academy's "SR-1 Form" for reporting traffic accidents on California State highways used to document any property damage, injuries, or fatalities resulting from the accident.
The California DMV requires that the SR-1 Form be submitted within 10 days of the accident. This requirement applies to all accidents on a California State highway, regardless of who is at fault. If the accident involves injury, death, or property damage over $1,000, it must be reported using the SR-1 Form.
The SR-1 Form is typically completed by the driver involved in the accident or by their insurance company. It requires detailed information about the accident, such as the date, time, and location, as well as all parties' names and contact information.
To know more about California, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30050163
#SPJ4
courtship displays in various species consists of a sequence where a fixed action pattern carried out by one individual serving as the releasing stimulus for an fap from the other one. true or false
The given statement: "Courtship displays in various species consist of a sequence where a fixed action pattern carried out by one individual serving as the releasing stimulus for an FAP from the other one" is TRUE.
Fixed action patterns (FAPs) are sequences of behavioral activities that are invariant and are typically displayed in a particular order. These behavioral patterns are initiated by the presence of a stimulus and are generally carried out to their logical conclusion.
Furthermore, FAPs are innate, meaning they are hardwired in the organism's neural circuitry.
Courtship Display
Courtship is a type of behavior exhibited by animals of different species before mating. Courtship display is a series of movements that communicate the readiness to mate.
Courtship displays in a variety of species consist of a sequence where a fixed action pattern carried out by one individual serves as the releasing stimulus for an FAP from the other one.
In other words, courtship displays in various species consist of a sequence in which one animal performs a specific activity or action pattern (fixed action pattern) that serves as a stimulus to release a response in another animal.
So, the given statement: "Courtship displays in various species consist of a sequence where a fixed action pattern carried out by one individual serving as the releasing stimulus for an FAP from the other one" is TRUE.
To learn more about courtship, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/21083576
#SPJ11
Question # 1
Multiple Choice
is an example of transient evidence at the crime scene
on Willow Lane.
O the bleeding man on the driveway
a nosey neighbor who keeps coming and going at the
crime scene
O a homeless person living in the woods behind the house
a lit cigarette in the ashtray near the dead body
Scenario
Tony is a victim advocate in state court. He has been preparing Mei to testify against her ex-husband, who has physically assaulted her several times since their divorce. Two weeks before trial, Mei tells Tony she no longer wants to testify. She’s concerned her children will not have enough money to get by if their father goes to jail. She’s worried her ex-husband’s friends will retaliate against her. She’s afraid people in her neighborhood will be angry at her for involving police in family problems. Tony has an idea of what to do, but decides to ask his coworkers, Nina and Lou, for advice.
* Tony thinks connecting Mei with housing and food programs will reduce her money worries. He hopes financial security will lead her to testify.
* Nina knows victims in domestic violence cases often change their stories. She wants to get Mei to provide a sworn statement about the attacks on video now. That way if Mei changes her story later, the prosecutor can challenge her with the original version.
* Lou wants to have Mei subpoenaed and forced to testify. If she will not cooperate, police can arrest her. Arrest would mean losing custody of her kids. Lou thinks Mei’s love for her children will lead her to testify.
What do you think is the best approach, and why? You can choose one of the three approaches here, or a mixture of them, or even come up with your own approach. Just be sure to explain your reasoning as you make a decision. There isn't a right answer, so take your time and be thoughtful, then respond to other people's posts in a similar fashion.
The best approach that can be taken to get Mel to testify against her husband would be to connect Mei with housing and food programs that will reduce her money worries.
This is because worry and fear about financial issues would be greatly reduced as she would have enough to get by which would aid her to testify.
What is a Testimony?This refers to the formal statement that is made by a person about a particular situation or incident in a court of law.
Hence, we can see that The best approach that can be taken to get Mel to testify against her husband would be to connect Mei with housing and food programs that will reduce her money worries.
This is because worry and fear about financial issues would be greatly reduced as she would have enough to get by which would aid her to testify.
Read more about court testimony here:
https://brainly.com/question/28089163
#SPJ1
Whose financial goals are most likely impacted by the event described?
A) chen invests half her money in nonliquid assets.
B) tina is underinsured and at fault in a car accident.
C) ben has adequate insurance and emergency savings
D) rodrigo invests in low-risk stocks and keeps 20 percent of his income liquid..
Which of the following initial written agreements is NOT legally
binding?
A) Memorandum of understanding
B) Letter of intent
C) Mixed document
D) Impossible to determine
Answer: A) Memorandum of understanding
Explanation:
lee Isaías 25,6-10 y encuentra dos comparaciones entre el banquete que describe
el profeta y la gloria que nos espera .
comparación 1
comparación 2
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Pues revisando la información solicitada, podemos hacer las siguientes comparaciones.
1.- En ese versículo, el profeta Isaías hace referencia a la metáfora de la montaña, en donde existe un gran banquete para los elegidos de Dios en la cima. Habla de las delicias que le esperan a los fieles de Dios como recompensa a sus acciones. Algo así como el premio del señor después de una vida entregada a él.
Podemos encontrar una idea similar, pero ésta se encuentra en el Nuevo Testamento, en el evangelio de Lucas, cuando el evangelista se refiere a que Jesús invita a los fieles a comer y gozar del reino de los cielos.
2.- La segunda comparación es cuando el profeta Isaías hace referencia a que Dios consolará a sus fieles en el cielo, después de la muerte. Ahí, dice Isaías, el humano ya no sentirá dolor ni sufrimiento como lo sentía en la Tierra.
De igual manera, en Corintios, dentro del Nuevo Testamento, se hace referencia a que Cristo vencerá a sus enemigos y reinará por siempre en el reino de los cielos, en donde el humano podrá vencer a la muerte como Jesús lo hizo.
What’s the importance of Steagald v United States? And do you agree with the decision?
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
“Law is not a factual statement (description is not in the nature of law); it is rather a prescriptive tool which purports to shape human behavior in the future.” Explain.
According to what is expressed in the fragment, it can be inferred that the purpose of the sentence is to clarify that laws are created to modify human behavior.
What is a law?A law is a term to refer to a norm or rule of society that citizens must comply with in order to live in harmony with others.
Laws are one of the oldest social tools in the world because they guarantee that citizens have a more controlled behavior with respect to others. Additionally, this provides them with some obligations that they must fulfill to belong to the social group.
According to the above, it can be inferred that the fragment refers to the fact that laws are an adequate tool to modify human behavior according to the needs of society.
Learn more about law in: https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
EXPLANATION ON FUNCTIONS OF LAW
The functions of law are to maintain social order, resolve disputes, protect rights and freedoms, and promote social justice.
What are the Functions of Law?The functions of law can be broadly classified into four categories:
Maintaining Social Order: Law helps maintain social order by establishing rules and regulations that govern behavior within a society. This helps to prevent chaos and promote stability.Resolving Disputes: Law provides a mechanism for resolving disputes between individuals or organizations. This helps to maintain social harmony and prevent conflicts from escalating.Protecting Rights and Freedoms: Law helps to protect individual rights and freedoms, such as the right to life, liberty, and property. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and protecting individuals from exploitation or abuse.Promoting Social Justice: Law helps to promote social justice by addressing and correcting inequalities within society. This can include protecting the rights of marginalized groups and ensuring equal access to resources and opportunities.Learn more about law here: https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Identify the limitations of a junior driver's license.
Answer:
I believe you cannot drive others before you’ve driven for a year
Explanation:
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be a. justifiable b. excusable c. criminal d. felonious
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be: excusable. The correct option is B
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident refers to an unintentional killing that occurs due to a lawful act conducted without any intention to harm. It is not considered a criminal act because there is no intent to cause harm or commit a crime. Therefore, it falls under the category of excusable homicide.
Excusable homicide is different from the other options provided:
a. Justifiable homicide refers to a killing that is legally justified, such as in self-defense or to protect others.
c. Criminal homicide is the act of unlawfully causing the death of another person, which can be either a misdemeanor or a felony depending on the circumstances.
d. Felonious homicide is a category of criminal homicide that involves a death occurring during the commission of a felony, such as a robbery or kidnapping.
In summary, a homicide committed by misadventure or accident is classified as excusable because it involves an unintentional killing without any intention to harm or commit a crime.
To know more about homicide, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30638493#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
A homicide committed by misadventure or accident would be
a. justifiable
b. excusable
c. criminal
d. felonious
A form of government where a king or queen is the sole leader of the country and holds almost all the power.
absolute monarchy
representative democracy
communism
oligarchy
Answer:
it's the 1st one absolute monarchy
John smith was born on January 1, 1965. Which customer listing is considered PII?
The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.
What constitutes PII?Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).
What is PII, and what are some examples?PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.
To know more about PII visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30023988
#SPJ1
Greg invites his supervisor (Leslie) and two other colleagues (Wanda and Eileen) to go fishing on his boat. While fishing, they have some beers. Eileen gets so drunk that she falls overboard. Greg, Leslie and Wanda rescue Eileen with the help of the harbor police. Leslie reports the incident to the management of the company, which opens an investigation. Greg refuses to cooperate and is disciplined.
a. Greg has a privacy right to keep silent because the incident happened at a social occasion and away from the work place.
b. Greg has a 5thAmendment right not to cooperate because the information that he provides might be used against him by the company in a disciplinary proceeding.
c. Greg's rights have not been violated because the company has legitimate business reasons for seeking information about the fishing incident.
d. Although Greg's right to privacy has been violated, the company can discipline him based on the information that it gets from Leslie, Wanda and Eileen.
wendell, new to the area, selects a doctor from the telephone book and visits that doctor to have a splinter extracted. unbeknownst to wendell, the doctor has never passed the state licensing exams. later, when wendell discovers the truth, he refuses to pay his bill. if the doctor sues for recovery of the fee, will the court support the doctor's claim?
No, the court is likely to take the position that it is not in the public's best interests to enforce contracts with unlicensed doctors.
On January 23, 2010, Bendiken observed his preliminary put-up. In this publication, he explained that the Unlicense is based on the copyright waiver of SQLite with the no-assurance declaration from the MIT License. He then walked through the license, commenting on each part. In a publish posted in December 2010, Bendiken similarly clarified what it method to "license" and "unlicensed" software. In December 2010, Mike Linksvayer, the vice president of innovative Commons on the time, wrote in an identi.Ca conversation "I just like the movement" in speaking of the Unlicense effort, considering it compatible with the dreams of the CC zero, released in 2009. On January 1, 2011, Bendiken reviewed the development and adoption of the Unlicense, pronouncing it became "hard to present estimates of present day Unlicense adoption" but there were "many loads of projects the use of the Unlicense".
Learn more about unlicensed here
https://brainly.com/question/28498855
#SPJ4
What kind of contract is a dvd of the month club?
Answer:
i think so Generic Contract
Explanation:
Generic Contract think so
Hey please help asap
A ___________ alleges that even if the facts as presented in the plaintiff's complaint are true, there is no reason to continue the lawsuit.
A. Settlement
B. Motion for summary judgment
C. Motion for judgment on the pleadings
D. Motion to dismiss
Answer:
A Motion to dismiss alleges that even if the facts as presented in the plaintiff's complaint are true, there is no reason to continue the lawsuit.
Explanation:
"A motion to dismiss is filed when a party believes that the complaint is legally invalid, which can be based on a variety of grounds." Basically, the case is thrown away.
Answer:
Motion to Dismiss
Explanation:
Pretty simple, as the question practically gives it to you, but i again had trouble with this question, but ay, don't we all?
Which of the following is an example of a statutory law? A. IRS regulatory rules and procedures B. A presidential executive order C. A court ruling overturning part of a law D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
Answer:
D. The U.S. Bankruptcy Code
The U.S. Bankruptcy Code is best example of statutory law.
Statutory instruments that have been authorized by a legislator, either a state or federal government, are known as statutory laws.
Regulations may mandate particular acts, ban them, serve as statements of purpose, or specify how the government will behave in specific situations.
So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/19769037?referrer=searchResults
Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for prosecuting mr. James. You announce your decision not to seek the death penalty in this case, but under your state?s law, the offense charged is considered special circumstances, which would qualify as a death penalty case. Your decision does not sit well with the law enforcement community. Provide an overview of the various courts in the typical state system where mr. James will appear and why he is appearing there, from arraignment to trial and the various levels of appeal. Be sure to provide specific information as it relates to any constitutional issues that may.
It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.
What are federal procedural norms?Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.
Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:
At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.
If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.
A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.
A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.
Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.
A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).
Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.
Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.
The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.
The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.
Learn more about justice:
https://brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4
In what ways do the state and federal governments work together in order to ensure that the court runs smoothly?
Answer:
Court take many years to solve a problem
Of every case
Summarize the events that happened in New Jersey vs TLO. Include how it started and then how it ultimately ended.
Answer:
In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.
Explanation:
Determine if the following items are considered to be individual or class evidence.
Fabric from a garment is class evidence. Textiles are mass-produced, they are considered class evidence.
What are individual and class evidence?Evidence with class characteristics is referred to as class evidence. Individual evidence is similar to evidence that possesses individual characteristics.
Both class and individual evidence have value; however, it usually takes much more class evidence (and much more time for collection and analysis) to have the same significance and weight as a single item of individual evidence.
Class evidence-
Fabric from a garment
Broken glass from a bottle
Tear from a piece of paper
Individual evidence-
Shoe print (pattern)
Bones found in a skull
matches from a match book
To learn more about class evidence
https://brainly.com/question/14263276
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes the principle of Respect for Persons as described in the Belmont Report?
The principle of person as it is contained in the Belmont report says that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents.
What is the Belmont report?This was a report that was written by the center for the protection of people that are used for the sake of biomedical report.
This report is very important due to the fact that it has to do with ethics as well as the health of particpants.
Raed more on the Belmont report here: https://brainly.com/question/4351542
What was the total number of adults under supervision in the United States in 2012?
O4,700
04.781,300
47.300
471,300
Ben wants his school board to give more funds to his school’s library. Which of the following is his best course of action?
1-Protest at the next school board meeting
2-Boycott the library until things change
3-Ask his classmates to sign a petition
4-Write an angry letter to the editor