from 1953 to 1969, under chief justice Earl Warren, the Supreme Court emerged as a major force in protecting _______
Answers
Answer:Im pretty sure the answer is civil liberties.
Explanation:
Related Questions
6. Insatiable Industries sues Tidbit Technologies for stealing their delicious recipes
for canned catfish stew. They don't want any money damages, though, just an
apology, and a court order saying that Tidbit will keep their nose out of
Insatiable's stew from this point forward. The judge rules in favor of Insatiable,
and Tidbit complains that this violates their right to a jury trial. The judge tells
Tidbit that he has done his job. Why? * "
Answers
Answer:
i dont know
Explanation:
sorry
What is a non-civic issue?
Answers
Answer:
a non-civic issue is something that’s an issue that can’t be solved by a community, society, state, group, etc. rather than a civic issue is something that can be solved by a community, society, state, group, etc.
Which of the following describes civic participation?
Taking action to resolve job issues
Taking action to resolve public issues
Taking action to resolve family issues
Taking action to resolve personal issues
Answers
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answers
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
15 points.
Doris Alexander was arrested for aggravated assault & battery after she allegedly attacked a stranger in the park. She argues that
prosecution will be unable to convict her because she had no motive for the attack. Is she correct?
1) yes
2) no
Answers
Answer: No, she isn't correct
Explanation: The charges have already been put against her and if there is sufficient evidence of the attack she will indeed be convicted
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
Answers
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
I need help please help me answer the question in the image!
Answers
Reason: the crime isn’t usually intended to kill or injure more than 100 people as there isn’t a minimum.
In a paragraph, describe what you would do about the variations in state requirements and training if you were interested in a career in security. Describe the steps you would take toward this career once you chose the state in which you'd like to live.
Answers
Answer:
First, regulators can issue penalties. Inadequate training is low hanging fruit to a regulator. It’s an easy thing that regulators can use to find fault.
Second, inadequate training will result in more data breaches in the long run. It’s inevitable. Humans are the greatest security risk. Training is a way to reduce that risk. There’s no way to get the risk to zero, but because each person is a risk, the more people that training can educate, then the lower the risk will be.
Regulators can first impose fines. A regulator views inadequate training as low hanging fruit. Second, a lack of training will eventually lead to further data breaches.
Can security be a good career?Protection of people and property is greatly aided by security personnel. A career as a security officer may be a fantastic choice for those who are enthusiastic about protecting others, are interested in law enforcement, and love having a physically demanding and interesting job.
For example, it is the responsibility of cybersecurity experts to defend against assaults from hackers, viruses, and other online hazards. These experts frequently collaborate with other IT specialists, including software developers or programmers, in teams. Firewalls, VPNs, Web proxies, and IDS/IPS should all be understood if you want to become an expert in cybersecurity. You must be knowledgeable in coding languages including PHP, HTML, Python, and Java. You ought to be well familiar with networking, routing protocols, and encryption methods.
Learn more about career here:
https://brainly.com/question/30040900
#SPJ2
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
The president's primary job is to enforce the laws passed by
b.
d.
the legislative branch
the Supreme Court
the President's Cabinet
the EOP
Answers
Answer:
the legislative branch
If a law that violates (conflicts with) the U.S. Constitution is challenged in court, the court will: a.enforce the law only if it is one that has been passed by a state legislature. b.enforce the law if it is rooted in a state constitutional principle. c.not enforce the law no matter what its source may be.
Answers
Answer:
If a law that violates (conflicts with) the U.S. Constitution is challenged in court, the court will: ... not enforce the law because only Congress has the power to enforce laws that violate the U.S. Constitution
Explanation:
How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another?
Answers
Answer:
Specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing. This can be because they have an abundance of a particular resource, such as oil or timber, or because they have developed expertise in a particular industry, such as manufacturing or technology. By specializing in the production of certain goods or services, countries can take advantage of economies of scale and produce a larger quantity at a lower cost.
For example, a country with an abundance of fertile land and a favorable climate for agriculture may specialize in producing and exporting food products, such as grains or fruits. Another country with a strong technology sector may specialize in producing and exporting high-tech goods, such as computers or smartphones. By trading with one another, these countries can each specialize in what they are best at and benefit from the lower prices and higher quality of the goods and services that they import.
Specialization also enables countries to take advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. For example, a country with a lower cost of labor may be able to produce goods at a lower cost than another country, making it more competitive in the global market. By specializing in the production of goods that they can produce at a lower cost, countries can increase their exports and boost their economies.
Overall, specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing, and by taking advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. This helps to create a more efficient global economy and allows countries to benefit from the goods and services produced by other countries.
Give two suggestions for each of the following cases:
1) One who doesn't go to school and plays throughout the day
2) One who gives interest in others' work.
3) One who shares a family's internal matter to others.
4) One who always complains for not being able to do any work.
5)One who interrupts a busy person.
Answers
I can't they say that the answer is rude
Why does the entire house vote to approve a new speaker
Answers
Answer:
Because the House dissolves at the end of a Congress and must start anew at the beginning of each new Congress
Explanation:
The last Epistle Paul wrote was:
Titus
2 Thessalonians
2 Timothy
Philemon
Romans
Answers
Answer:
2 Timothy
Explanation:
Answer: 2 Timothy
Explanation: The Second Epistle to Timothy is one of the three pastoral epistles traditionally attributed to Paul the Apostle. Addressed to Timothy, a fellow missionary, it is traditionally considered to be the last epistle he wrote before his death.
Of the problematic groups discussed in the unit, which one is most similar to the Mexican drug cartels? Which one is the most different? Explain.
pls give me an answer
Answers
The police obtained a valid arrest warrant for a drug dealer. A reliable informant told the police that the drug dealer was staying at a friend's house until "the heat was off." Without having obtained a search warrant, the police went to the friend's house, knocked on the door, and asked the friend if the drug dealer was there. The friend replied that the drug dealer had been staying at the house for a few days but had left a few hours ago. The police pushed open the door and began searching for the drug dealer. They found him hiding in a closet along with two five-pound bricks of marijuana. They arrested both the drug dealer and the friend. Before his trial for possession of marijuana, the friend moved to suppress the marijuana found in the closet. Should the court grant the motion to suppress?
Answers
Answer:
yes because the friend said that he left but they found him in a closet so in a way, the friend lied to the police, and lying to the police needs a reason, and a place to reason, the court.
( i would like brainliest if i'm right)
I hate civics
In the case of plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme court focused it's decision on the interpretation of the world _____.
Answers
Answer:
Equal.
Explanation:
(1896) The case involved whether the state could segregate based on race.
The court ruled that segregation based on race did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities were equal in quality.
This became known as the "separate but equal" doctrine, which was later overruled by Brown v. Board of Education.
Please don't hate civics. Give it a little attention and you will learn so much about the world around you and how many of the laws in existence today were determined.
plessy v ferg. wanted all to be equal
Why is amendment 26 important?
Answers
Answer: Forty years ago, the 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect, lowering the universal voting age in America from 21 years to 18 years. Millions of young Americans were extended the right to vote, empowering more young people than ever before to help shape our country.
Explanation:
After standing trial for multiple muggings, Zeke is given a jail sentence of two years in prison. The judge says that Zeke is a menace to the public,
and it is his duty to make sure that the public is kept safe from Zeke's future actions. What goal of law enforcement does the judge's reason cover?
О А.
general deterrence
OB. incapacitation
OC. punishment
OD. rehabilitation
Answers
The goal of law enforcement that the judge's reason covers is: B. incapacitation.
What is the goal of law of incapacitation ?The primary purpose of law enforcement is to incapacitate criminals by detaching them from society through imprisonment or some other type of confinement.
When a judge declares that Zeke poses a threat to the public and should be isolated, it indicates that the goal of his punishment is his incapacitation, not retribution, reform, or deterrence against comparable crimes committed by others.
Find out more on incapacitation at https://brainly.com/question/2403183
#SPJ1
a case involved a felony murder charge, what type of court would have jurisidiction to hear the case
Answers
Answer:
General Jurisdiction
Explanation:
As a student interested in law, crime, and corrections, how can you benefit from researching COMSTAT databases? Write a response of at least 150 words.
Answers
Answer:
Dr. Laura Wyckoff, Bureau of Justice Assistance FellowFocusing resources on high-crime places, high-rate offenders, and repeat victims can help police effectively reduce crime in their communities. Doing so …
Explanation:
Dr. Laura Wyckoff, Bureau of Justice Assistance FellowFocusing resources on high-crime places, high-rate offenders, and repeat victims can help police effectively reduce crime in their communities. Doing so …
Of the slightly less that 1.5 percent of those stopped by the police on U.S. streets, the majority of these individuals claimed that _____.
the police used unnecessary force
they were questioned and quickly released
the police acted appropriately
they were not asked a single question by the police officer
Answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
Which of the following is NOT provided with the authority to move vehicles or
cargo under Authority Removal laws?
A. State officials
B. County officials
C. Private investigators
D. State departments of transportation
Answers
A judge’s cases were being reviewed, and it was discovered that the judge systematically gave longer sentences to minority defendants but shorter sentences to attractive women. What ethical standard is the judge MOST LIKELY violating?
A.
utilitarianism
B.
virtue
C.
common good
D.
fairness and justice
Answers
The judge is likely transgressing the laws of fairness and justice.
Is utilitarianism a moral principle?Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that establishes right from wrong by emphasising outcomes. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of individuals is the morally ideal one.
Is utilitarianism a reliable ethical principle?Its is a fundamental tenet—that the moral rightness or wrongness of actions relies on their consequences—is shared with other consequentialist systems. The only an effects that really matter are the outcomes of that an action produces, whether positive and negative.
To know more about justice visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30169554
#SPJ1
different types of paperwork and professional documents which are required for firefighters
Answers
Answer:
1. Personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements.
2. Standard operating procedures (SOPs).
3. Fire department policies and procedures.
4. Local, state, and federal laws and regulations.
5. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards.
6. Incident reports.
7. Training records.
8. Medical records.
9. Safety reports.
10. Investigative reports.
If a person is taken into custody and there was not an arrest warrant issued, the police have to prove...?
Answers
Answer:
What was the cause of the arrest and when it happened
Explanation:
Naomi was convicted of assault after an argument with her housekeeper. The judge ordered that she spend 20 hours working on a crew picking up trash along the side of a busy highway. What is this punishment called?
probation
house arrest
restitution
community service
Answers
Can someone please tell me the difference between being a detective on the police force, vs. a crime scene investigator? (csi)
Thank you!
Answers
Explanation:
Detective: A person, especially a police officer, whose occupation is to investigate and solve crimes.
CSI:A Crime Scene Investigator (CSI) is in charge of extracting every possible piece of evidence from a particular crime scene. More often than not, they are employed by state or federal law enforcement, but civilians with a background in science may also be qualified for this position.
And the other is to try and stop some crimes
What make an action become terroristic?
Answers
Answer:
relating to or involving the use of unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Explanation: