generally, the liability of a principal on a contract formed by an agent with a third party depends on whether the agent was authorized to act.

Answer:

Deceptive motivation

Explanation:

"Kind of," "I guess," "Little bit" are all examples of equivocating terms showing a deviation from the expected norm representing a Deceptive Motivation

A deceptive motivation is the intent to conceal the truth about a thing and most times the terms used are equivocating terms like " I guess " as seen in the question above.

Health care providers use the Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol (SRDP) to report all suspected fraud and abuse. The SRDP is a voluntary disclosure program designed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for health care providers to report potential violations of the Stark Law. The Stark Law prohibits physicians from referring Medicare patients for certain designated health services to an entity in which they have a financial relationship, in order to prevent conflicts of interest and maintain patient care quality.

By utilizing the SRDP, health care providers proactively disclose self-referral violations and work with the CMS to resolve any issues. This process promotes transparency and allows for the timely identification and correction of potential fraud and abuse in the health care system. It also helps health care providers to avoid severe penalties that may result from a formal investigation. In summary, the Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol (SRDP) plays a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the health care system by allowing health care providers to report and resolve suspected fraud and abuse related to physician self-referrals in a cooperative and efficient manner. This not only benefits the health care providers but also protects patients and preserves the integrity of the Medicare program.

to know about SRDP visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32049867

#SPJ11

Legalism and Confucianism played a vital role in ancient China's political, economic, and social development. The two schools of thought had different philosophies, which contributed to the country's rise to power after the Warring States Period. They are essential in understanding China's imperial order and its social and political systems during the time.

Both Legalism and Confucianism played a part in the unification of China by providing a unique set of rules for rulers to follow. Legalism offered an authoritarian approach to government, which relied on harsh punishment and strict laws to enforce order. Meanwhile, Confucianism focused on the moral cultivation of individuals and officials to ensure a just society. Hence, the two schools of thought played a critical role in laying the foundation for China's imperial order. However, Confucianism was the primary force in shaping China's imperial order because it became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty. It emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships, which encouraged people to follow a code of ethics based on mutual respect, responsibility, and trust. These principles provided a framework for social, economic, and political interactions between different classes and groups within society.

In conclusion, both Legalism and Confucianism helped ancient China collectively move out of the Warring State Period and establish imperial order. Although Legalism provided an authoritarian approach to government, Confucianism became the mainstream philosophy of the Han Dynasty and emphasized moral cultivation, humaneness, and social relationships. Confucianism was the main answer to China's imperial order, while Legalism was an essential contributor.

Learn more about the Han Dynasty: https://brainly.com/question/1149953

#SPJ11

Glassworx Corporation having exclusive control over the market for its products could potentially be a violation of antitrust law.

Antitrust laws are enacted to promote fair competition in the marketplace and prevent the abuse of market power by companies. The specific term used to describe exclusive control over a market is known as a monopoly. A monopoly occurs when a single company or entity has significant control or dominance over a particular market or industry.

Under antitrust laws, monopolies are generally considered undesirable because they can stifle competition, limit consumer choice, and potentially lead to higher prices or lower quality products. They can also hinder innovation and discourage new market entrants.

In many jurisdictions, including the United States, monopolistic practices are often regulated or prohibited by antitrust legislation. These laws aim to prevent and remedy anticompetitive behavior, such as the abuse of dominant market position, price fixing, predatory pricing, or unfair trade practices.

In the case of Glassworx Corporation having exclusive control over the market for its products, antitrust authorities would likely scrutinize the situation to determine if the company's conduct is anticompetitive and violates antitrust laws. If it is determined that Glassworx's market dominance is achieved through anticompetitive practices or is detrimental to competition, enforcement actions could be taken.

Antitrust enforcement agencies have various tools at their disposal to address monopolistic practices, including fines, divestitures, injunctions, and other remedies designed to restore competition and protect consumer welfare.

However, it is essential to consider that not all situations of market dominance automatically violate antitrust laws. In some cases, a company may achieve a dominant market position through legitimate means, such as superior product quality, innovation, or efficiency. Antitrust laws focus on addressing the abuse of market power and anticompetitive behavior rather than punishing companies solely based on their market share or position.

In summary, under antitrust law, Glassworx Corporation having exclusive control over the market for its products could potentially be considered a violation. Monopolistic practices that stifle competition and harm consumer welfare are generally discouraged and regulated by antitrust laws. Antitrust authorities would examine the specific circumstances to determine if Glassworx's conduct is anticompetitive and take appropriate enforcement actions to promote fair competition and protect consumers.

Learn more about violation here

https://brainly.com/question/13885689

#SPJ11

The validity of the assignment of Durham's annuity payments without Traveler's consent depends on the settlement agreement's conditions.

Andrew Durham and Traveler's Indemnity Company signed a workers compensation settlement agreement that required Traveler's to make monthly payments to Durham for the rest of his life. Traveler's bought an annuity in its name to pay for this obligation and the agreement stated that permission was needed before any annuity payments could be assigned.

But without getting Traveler's approval, Durham borrowed money from a credit union using his annuity payments as security. The specific conditions for assignment stated in the settlement agreement must be met in order for this assignment to be valid.

The assignment may be deemed invalid without Traveler's approval which might result in a breach of the settlement agreement. To determine whether the assignment is valid, a legal analysis of the contract and the applicable laws is necessary.

To know more about settlement agreement here

brainly.com/question/30410100

#SPJ4

When is it legal in Virginia to use your headlights. Every vehicle operating on a Commonwealth highway must have functioning headlights and other lighting.

From dusk to dawn, when a driver can see no further than 500 feet, and when the windscreen wipers are in operation, headlights must be used. the USA: VIRGINIA Most drivers activate their windscreen wipers when it starts to rain. The requirement to also have the vehicle's headlights on is legal in Virginia. When the new year arrives, a number of new laws will go into effect in Virginia, including a limit on police ticket quotas, a new marijuana possession charge, modifications to medicinal marijuana licences, misdemeanour reporting requirements for school principals, among other things.

Virginia law at the moment According to Virginia State Law 46.2-1030, every driver on a route inside the Commonwealth must use lit headlights between the hours of sunset and daybreak. when rain, fog, sleet, or snow is the cause of the need for windscreen wipers.

Read more about Virginia law at

https://brainly.com/question/30194965

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

waste stream

Infanticide, the killing of the newborn. It has often been interpreted as a primitive method of birth control and a means of ridding a group of its weak and deformed children; but most societies actively desire children and put them to death (or allow them to die) only under exceptional circumstances.\

Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.

From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.

From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.

Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.

Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.

learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650

#SPJ1

Common law is often referred to as case law and judge-made law .

Option e is correct .

Common law is a system of law based on judicial judgments and precedents. It is developed and refined by the application of legal principles and arguments by judges in adjudicating a particular case. When judges interpret and apply law to resolve disputes, their decisions become part of common law and provide binding precedent for future litigation involving similar points of fact or law. Set.

The term "case law" reflects the fact that common law is built on the outcomes of specific cases decided by courts. Judges' decisions in these cases serve as precedents that guide future court decisions and shape the development of law.  

Hence, Option e is correct .

To know more about case law visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30580233

#SPJ4

There are various factors that contribute to swelling prison populations. One of the factors that contribute to swelling prison populations is mandatory minimum sentencing laws.

Mandatory minimum sentencing laws:

Mandatory minimum sentencing laws are one of the factors that contribute to swelling prison populations. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws are enacted by state and federal governments to set minimum sentencing guidelines for specific offenses. Judges must impose the minimum sentences, which can be as long as 25 years, regardless of mitigating circumstances or a defendant's background.

These laws have led to longer sentences, which have contributed to increased imprisonment rates. Offenders are receiving longer sentences for nonviolent drug-related offenses, which have resulted in overcrowding in prisons across the United States. In conclusion, mandatory minimum sentencing laws have contributed to the swelling of prison populations.

To know more about imprisonment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9667067

#SPJ11

Answer:

a member of congress

Explanation:

I think im not 100% though

The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."

Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.

When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.

Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145

#SPJ1

Answer:

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

That's the right answer D.

Yh ✌❤❤

An example of a treaty automatically creating legal rights in the courts of a signatory state includes: Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air.

The Montreal convention is a multilateral treaty adopted with the aid of a diplomatic meeting of ICAO member states in 1999. It amended important provisions of the Warsaw convention's regime concerning reimbursement for the victims of air failures.

What is the motive of the Montreal convention?

The primary targets of the Montreal convention are to offer for equitable repayment for demise or harm to passengers, and damage to luggage and load, that occur in worldwide air carriage. To facilitate the green operation of global carriage by way of air of passengers, baggage and cargo.

Who does the Montreal convention practice to?

The Montreal convention applies to all international flights between nations and territories that honor the regulation. Currently, over a hundred thirty five nations and territories abide by way of the Montreal convention. All member states of the European Union and the general public of the UN member states recognize the convention.

Learn more about Montreal convention here:- https://brainly.com/question/27936767

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

I hope it's helpful for you

Answer:

In this case, He contrasts His spiritual leadership with that of false teachers, including the hypocritical religious critics of His own era. Jesus previously identified Himself as "the Good Shepherd," saying that He was willing to die for the sake of His flock. This is a very different approach from a typical "hired" shepherd, who is inclined to run when there is danger. Spiritually, Jesus is the ultimate example of a shepherd willing to sacrifice Himself for the safety and health of His flock.

In the prior verse, Jesus echoed an important point made in His first analogy (John 10:1–6). There He referred to the way sheep instinctively learn to recognize the voice of their own shepherd. This reflects the close, knowing, personal relationship a "good shepherd" has with the sheep. Here, Jesus compares that closeness and intimacy with the relationship between God the Son and God the Father. This echoes other statements in the New Testament which imply that salvation through Jesus Christ brings us into an intimate family relationship with God (1 John 3:1; Romans 8:16–17).

Answer:

la suficienta de probe

Explanation:

Answer:

During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?

Explanation:

There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.

The legal definition of "in writing" may vary depending on the jurisdiction, but generally it refers to any information or communication that is expressed or represented in a tangible form, such as a physical document, email, or text message.

In many legal contexts, "in writing" may also require a signature or some other form of authentication to indicate the authorship or agreement of the parties involved. Ultimately, the specific legal definition of "in writing" will depend on the particular laws and regulations applicable to the jurisdiction and context in which it is used.

Learn more about legal definition

https://brainly.com/question/30103295

#SPJ4

Answer:

Dark Figure of crime.

Explanation:

The dark (or hidden) figure of crime is a term employed by criminologists and sociologists to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.

Answer:

which organ is responsible in dealing with constitional disputes?

answer:

the questions are in bold letters. the answers are underneath

Explanation:

1. Explain why we need to overhaul and simplify the law and how the legal system has changed

The law according to howard is a powerful tool that has the power of driving human behaviors and the united states has to overhaul the laws and make the laws simple so that the Americans would have the passion to address the issues facing the US.

People live in fear of what might happen next. Due to easily getting sued as well as charges that could be pressed at work and almost in all aspects of ones life. The law is getting heavier as the time goes by. People are afraid that they may say something that would land them in court. There is the constant fear if lawsuits..

2. Discuss how these changes have influenced the daily lives of people in the United States? Briefly explain one example Howard gives.

People now find it difficult to take actions on what is their best judgements. Fewer people are standing up for themselves now.

3. Choose one of the three propositions that Howard makes and explain it.

One of his propositions is to re-establish the aims, objectives and the purposes of the law. when people know the requirements of the law they would know how best to avoid breaking it. Boundaries of the law have to be set so people will know what the law requires of them.

4. According to Howard, how can freedom be rebuilt?

Freedom can be rebuilt with effort from the society and the government agencies.

5. Do you agree or disagree with Howard that the legal system is broken? Why or why not?

I agree the legal system is broken. Too. many laws these days have people acting in certain ways. In schools for instance, school children feel they can act in anyway they like. Any correction is seen like their rights are being taken from them. Howards assessment of the healthcare system is correct. Instead of helping people the healthcare system is more concerned with how they can avoid lawsuits.

The Supreme Court's ruling in the Trans-Missouri Freight Association case strengthen the federal government's power---- It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads.

The Federal Government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively. There are hundreds of Federal agencies and commissions charged with handling responsibilities as varied as managing America’s space program, protecting its forests, gathering intelligence, and advancing the general welfare of the American people.

Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust measure that prohibited anti competitive behavior in commerce) applied to the railroad industry, even though the U.S. Congress had enacted a comprehensive regime .

Learn more about federal government power:

brainly.com/question/860014

#SPJ4

Answer:

Under the new policy, police can’t quietly upload a fake profile to a genealogy website, as some have done in hopes of finding a suspect’s distant relatives, without first identifying themselves.

Explanation: