Answer:
Their leaders suffered another defeat(Along with Hitler ending his life after so many losses), and most people were Starving and freezing in the streets. And 1/4 of those people were soldiers. All of their economic downfalls took them a while to come back from.
Approximately what percent of soldiers who had what we now call PTSD
were able to return to war?*
20%
50%
80%
Almost 100%
which strategy with a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid
North America at mid-eighteenth century was home to a remarkable diversity of people and different kinds of social organization.” In a thoughtful and detailed essay with specific examples, defend this statement. Your discussion must touch on 7 of the colonies and include at least 2 of the different groups of people living in each colony as well as the freedoms and liberties extended to them. What common theme(s) concerning diversity, colonial freedoms and liberties can you discern among the colonies? During this period did any of the colonies appear to have reached a consensus among their population about the freedoms and liberties offered? Explain.
After the first permanent English colony was settled in 1607, English colonists soon populated the entire eastern seaboard of the present-day United States. All had different reasons for sailing across the Atlantic, leading to several distinct colonies.
What is American colonies?American colonies, also called thirteen colonies or colonial America, the 13 British colonies that were established during the 17th and early 18th centuries in what is now a part of the eastern United States.[1] The colonies grew both geographically along the Atlantic coast and westward and numerically to 13 from the time of their founding to the American Revolution (1775–81).[2] Their settlements had spread far beyond the Appalachians and extended from Maine in the north to the Altamaha River in Georgia when the Revolution began, and there were at that time about 2.5 million American colonists.[3]
Read more about American colonies here:
https://brainly.com/question/385363
#SPJ3
Answer:
In the mid-eighteenth century, North America was a place of remarkable diversity, with different kinds of social organizations and a wide range of people living in seven colonies. These colonies were Massachusetts, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.
Massachusetts was a Puritan colony with a strong religious culture. However, it also had a significant population of enslaved Africans who were brought in to work on the farms. Despite the harsh treatment of slaves, the colony was known for its commitment to individual freedom and liberty, exemplified in the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, which outlined the rights and freedoms of citizens.
Virginia, on the other hand, was a plantation economy based on slave labor. The colony also had a large population of indentured servants, who worked for a set number of years to pay off their passage to the New World. The rights and freedoms of indentured servants were limited, but landowners had a degree of freedom in terms of owning property and managing their estates.
Pennsylvania was founded as a Quaker colony with a focus on religious tolerance and equality. This attracted a diverse range of people, including Mennonites, Amish, and German settlers. The colony also had a large population of enslaved Africans and a significant number of indentured servants. Despite the presence of slaves, Pennsylvania was known for its liberal views on individual rights and freedoms.
Maryland was a proprietary colony founded by Lord Baltimore, who intended it to be a haven for Catholics. This attracted a diverse range of people, including Protestants, Jews, and Quakers. The colony also had a significant population of enslaved Africans and a large number of indentured servants. Despite the presence of slaves, Maryland was known for its religious toleration and respect for individual freedoms.
New York was a Dutch colony that became English in the mid-seventeenth century. It was a diverse place with a large population of enslaved Africans and a significant number of indentured servants. The colony also had a diverse range of European immigrants, including Dutch, English, French, and Germans. Despite the presence of slavery, New York was known for its religious toleration and commitment to individual freedoms.
Rhode Island was founded by Roger Williams, a dissident Puritan who advocated for religious toleration and separation of church and state. The colony attracted a diverse range of people, including Quakers, Baptists, and Jews. It also had a significant population of enslaved Africans and a large number of indentured servants. Despite the presence of slavery, Rhode Island was known for its commitment to religious freedom and individual liberties.
Connecticut was a Puritan colony with a strong religious culture. It also had a diverse population, including enslaved Africans and indentured servants, as well as Dutch and English settlers. Despite the presence of slavery, Connecticut was known for its commitment to individual freedom and liberty.
The common theme among these colonies was their commitment to individual freedoms and liberties, despite the presence of slavery and indentured servitude. These colonies were known for their religious toleration, commitment to free speech, and protection of property rights. The idea of individual freedoms and liberties was a core value in these colonies, and it was reflected in their laws and political institutions.
However, it is important to note that none of these colonies had reached a consensus among their population about the freedoms and liberties offered. While many people in these colonies enjoyed individual freedoms and liberties, others, such as enslaved Africans and indentured servants, did not. These groups were excluded from the benefits of these freedoms and liberties, and their voices were not heard in the political process.
In conclusion, the mid-eighteenth century was a time of remarkable diversity in North America, with different kinds of social organizations and a wide range of people living in seven colonies. Despite the presence of slavery and indentured servitude,
Explanation:
How has illegal immigration impacted the U.S. economy? Also give an example if it has or has not.
Geographic Context definition
1. Geographic contexts (the human and physical characteristics of places and environments) are the settings for events in the past.
I hope you've had a spectacular night/day
What was Alexander Graham Bell selected leader's leadership style? Support your position with credible references with respect to the style, and include an accurate biography and depiction of historical events.
Bell's leadership style was transformational leadership.Bell's leadership style was transformational, and it had an impact on his work and the work of those who worked with him.
Transformational leaders inspire and encourage others to be creative and innovative. Transformational leaders are creative thinkers who frequently create new approaches and solutions to complex difficulties.The telephone was created in 1876, and it was regarded as one of the most important inventions of all time.
Alexander Graham Bell is a well-known figure in the world of science and technology. Bell's work had a major impact on society, and he was regarded as a leader in his field. Bell was an excellent communicator and motivator, and he was an enthusiastic teacher.
Bell believed that it was critical to educate the deaf and develop technologies that would aid in their communication.Bell was a committed and enthusiastic teacher who worked hard to ensure that his students received the best possible education.
Bell was a fantastic leader who inspired his team to work hard and produce excellent work. Bell's style of leadership had a significant impact on his work and the work of those who worked with him.Bell's leadership style was transformational, and it had an impact on his work and the work of those who worked with him. Transformational leaders inspire and encourage others to be creative and innovative.
Transformational leaders are creative thinkers who frequently create new approaches and solutions to complex difficulties.
For more such question on leadership style visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29667574
#SPJ8
What does Jefferson mean when he writes “and to provide new Guards for their future security”?
When Thomas Jefferson wrote “ And to provide new guards for the future security”, I think he was meaning that he wants to defend and protect.
The quote of Thomas Jefferson, “and to provide new Guards for their future security”, is to be interpreted as the provision of additional defense and security.
What is the significance of Thomas Jefferson and his address?Thomas Jefferson, apart from being the American President, is also remembered for being the person who signed the Declaration of American Independence in the year 1776. He also holds an important position in the early American political history.
While addressing the security of the Americans in his speech, Jefferson had laid a great amount of emphasis on the provision of Guards for the future security and other defensive purposes in the society.
Therefore, the significance regarding Thomas Jefferson and his address has been aforementioned.
Learn more about Thomas Jefferson here:
https://brainly.com/question/13346823
#SPJ2
What was the result ahmed gragns war
Ahmed Gragn's war was a conflict that occurred in the 16th century between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia. The result of the war was that Adal Sultanate was defeated by Abyssinia and Ahmed Gragn was killed.
Ahmed Gragn, also known as Ahmed Gran, was an influential Muslim leader who led the Adal Sultanate against Abyssinia in the 16th century. His invasion of Abyssinia resulted in a significant conflict that lasted for around 14 years, beginning in 1529 AD.
The conflict began when Ahmed Gragn launched an attack on the Christian kingdom of Abyssinia, which was ruled by Lebna Dengel at the time. In 1531, he was able to capture the city of Harar, which gave him a strategic position to launch further attacks on Abyssinia. However, despite his early successes, Ahmed Gragn's campaign ultimately failed, and he was killed in 1543.
The war between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia was a significant event in the history of Ethiopia. The conflict weakened Adal Sultanate and strengthened Abyssinia. After Ahmed Gragn's death, Abyssinia continued to expand its territory, and its rulers maintained control of the region for several centuries.
learn more about Ahmed Gragn's war
https://brainly.com/question/15233756
Briefly explain why ONE of the following options best demonstrates the historical interpretation that democracy in America was expanded in the 1820s and 1830s. Permanent institutionalization of the political party system (1836) Non-renewal of the charter of the Bank of the national bank (1836) Government policies supporting rapid westward expansion (1830) Provide an example of an event or development to support your explanation. Briefly explain why ONE of the other options is not as useful as evidence that democracy in America expanded in the time of the 1820s and 1830s.
Answer:
The option that best demonstrates the historical interpretation that democracy in America was expanded in the 1820s and 1830s is:
Permanent institutionalization of the political party system (1836).
The event that supported this was the formation of two main political parties: the Democratic Party and the Republic (Whig) Party.
The reason that "Non-renewal of the charter of the Bank of the national bank (1836)" is not as useful as an evidence that democracy in America expanded in the time of the 1820s and 1830s is that the issue was not for the political parties to decide. It was Congress that exercised the right to renew the charter, which President Andrew Jackson vetoed.
Explanation:
The party system institutionalization in the United States happened with the formation of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party (formerly the Whig Party). These party systems brought stability in governance and lowered populism in political structure. They gave the parties the opportunity to develop internally and foster better public policies.
Task: To enter or not to enter World War II. It was a decision that caused much controversy in the US. Write an essay in which you analyze and assess Roosevelt's argument for supporting the allies in the World War II and Hutchin's argument against involvement. After considering both arguments express your own point of view .
Introduction:
• Briefly describe how the war in Europe was going for the Allies in late 1940 about the time these two opinions were expressed.
•Contrast Roosevelt's argument for getting involved on the side of the Allies with Hutchins argument for not getting involved.
•Thesis, consider their arguments and express your own point of view
Body:
•Discuss, analyze, and assess Roosevelt's reason for getting involved.
•Discuss, analyze, and assess Hutchins reasons for not getting involved
Conclusion:
•Sum up the arguments for and against involvement
• Sum up your assessment of both arguments
•Make a connection: Think of a present day conflict. Should the US be involved?
There were numerous major causes of World War II. The effects of the Treaty of Versailles, which came after World War I, the global economic depression, the failure of appeasement, the rise of militarism in Germany and Japan.
What sparked World War II's conflict?A state of instability in Europe was brought about by the First World War, which lasted from 1914 to 1918. This set the stage for World War II, a second international conflict that would begin two decades later and prove to be even more devastating. The Nazi Party's leader, Adolf Hitler, came to power in Germany, which was economically and politically unstable at the time. To advance his objectives of world dominance, he rearmed the nation and signed strategic treaties with Italy and Japan. The attack of Poland by Hitler in September 1939 provoked France and Extraordinary England to announce battle on Germany, starting off The Second Great War. Out of an estimated 45-60 million people who were killed, six million Jews were murdered in Nazi concentration camps as part of Hitler's heinous "Final Solution," which is now known as the Holocaust.
To learn more about war visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ1
According to the lesson, what were three major problems facing the Union after the Civil War? Select one of the problems you listed and explain why it could be the most difficult one to solve.
According to the lesson, three major problems facing the Union after the Civil War were the people still wanted slaves, poverty, and poor relief.
During the American Civil War, the majority of the combat took place in the South. This was caused in part by the battle plans employed by both parties. The South only needed to live to prevail in the conflict. On the other side, the Union needed to be revived for the North to stay. In order to win the match, Union troops had to conquer the South. The Southerners suffered greatly due to the war activity near their houses. There were additional causes why the difficulties got worse or worse. Due to its agricultural nature, the South had more trouble than the North in producing the necessary goods for both its citizens and troops. Due to this, Southern citizens during the conflict likely had to make more substantial sacrifices than Northern civilians did.
Know more about the Civil war here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
Question 9 of 10
Federal spending that is not required by law is called:
O A. discretionary spending.
B. mandatory spending.
OC. deficit spending.
D. surplus spending.
Answer: Discretionary spending
Discretionary spending refers to federal government spending that is not mandated by law.
What is Discretionary spending?Discretionary spending is government spending that is authorized by an appropriations bill. In contrast to social programs, where financing is mandated and determined by the number of eligible recipients, this expenditure is a voluntary component of fiscal policy. National defense, international aid, education, and transportation are some examples of fields financed through discretionary spending. Discretionary expenditure in the United States refers to optional spending determined by allocation levels each year at the discretion of Congress. During the budget process, Congress passes a budget resolution that includes discretionary spending levels, projected deficits, and directives for revising entitlement programs and tax policy. A frequent example is when a person buys a new smartphone whenever the current edition is out.
To learn more about Discretionary spending, click
https://brainly.com/question/27232573
#SPJ1
Answer: discretionary spending
Explanation:
Germany disobeyeused its small fleet of 27 subs. On February 4, 1915 Germany declared area around British Isles a war zone. Unterseeboot (U-Boats) would operate freely. Germans warned Americans not to travel on British ships.
America
Britain
Global Law
international law
Germany's decision to disobey international law and use its fleet of 27 submarines, known as U-Boats, freely in the war zone around the British Isles directly impacted several entities, including America, Britain, and the concept of international law.
Germany's actions challenged the principles of international law and had significant consequences for the parties involved.
Germany's declaration of the war zone and the unrestricted submarine warfare posed a threat to American citizens and British ships. The warning issued by the Germans to Americans not to travel on British ships highlighted the potential danger and risk to American lives. This ultimately influenced America's stance and later entry into World War I.
Britain, being the targeted area for the unrestricted submarine warfare, faced increased risks and challenges in defending its maritime interests. The threat from German U-Boats impacted British shipping, trade, and military operations, leading to significant losses and casualties.
Moreover, Germany's disregard for international law and its aggressive actions in the war zone challenged the principles and norms established by the global community. International law aims to maintain peace, protect human rights, and regulate the conduct of nations during times of conflict. Germany's actions in violating international law undermined the global order and set a precedent for the violation of established rules and agreements.
In summary, Germany's disobedience of international law and the use of U-Boats in the war zone had far-reaching implications for America, Britain, and the concept of international law itself. It directly affected the safety of American citizens, disrupted British maritime operations, and posed a challenge to the established principles of global governance.
For more questions on U-Boats
https://brainly.com/question/30186660
#SPJ8
Based on your reading of the text, summarize how the concept of Roman citizenship evolved in 3-5 complete sentences. Cite evidence in your answer.
Answer:Based on your reading of the text, summarize how the concept of Roman citizenship evolved in 3-5 complete sentences. Cite evidence in your answer.
Explanation: makes sense
Question 7 of 10
The defendant in a trial is unsatisfied with the Maryland Circuit Court's ruling.
To which court will the party most likely try to appeal?
OA. The District Court of Maryland
B. The Maryland Court of Appeals
OC. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals
OD. The U.S. Supreme Court
SUBMIT
If the defendant in a trial is unsatisfied with the Maryland Circuit Court's ruling the next court that the party will most likely try to appeal is:
C. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals
Which court can be used to appeal a matter?After a defendant has been tried in the Maryland Circuit Court and they are not happy with the outcome of the ruling, the next place where they can appeal the judgment is at the Maryland Court of Special Appeals.
If they are not also satisfied with the judgment here, they can appeal to The Maryland Court of Appeals which is the highest court in Maryland.
Learn more about appealing a judgment here:
https://brainly.com/question/9337822
#SPJ1
PLEASE QUICK HELP I BEG OF YOU!!! GIVING ALL POINTS
If Pluto had not been demoted to a dwarf planet, what category if planet would if fall under? Explain your answer.
Answer:
The planet pluto originally was considered as a real planet until its demotion as a dwarf planet.
The reason it was demoted was because it was soon realized to not meet the three criteria of the International Astronomical Union used to define a full size planet.
So if pluto was not categorized as a dwarf planet than it would of just fallen under as a planet.
Pluto would have been classified as a planet if it had not been classified as a dwarf planet.
Pluto was formerly thought to be a genuine planet before it was demoted to a dwarf planet.
It was downgraded because it failed to fulfill the three requirements established by the International Astronomers Union to designate a full-size planet.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/13402868?referrer=searchResults
1. Interpret: How does Marx seem to view the idea of self-interest in the first paragraph (ie.
a good or bad thing)? How is this similar or different to Adam Smith?
In the first paragraph of Marx's writing, he seems to view the idea of self-interest as a negative thing. He argues that the capitalist system, which is based on self-interest, leads to exploitation and oppression of the working class.
This is different from Adam Smith's view of self-interest, as Smith believed that the pursuit of self-interest in a market economy leads to economic growth and prosperity for all. Smith's idea is often referred to as "the invisible hand" of the market.
What is self-interest according to Adam Smith?Adam Smith, the 18th-century economist and philosopher, believed that self-interest is a natural human motivation that can lead to economic prosperity. In his book "The Wealth of Nations,"
Smith wrote that individuals acting in their own self-interest will naturally work to improve their own well-being, which in turn will lead to the betterment of society as a whole. He called this phenomenon the "invisible hand" of the market, where individuals pursuing their own self-interests unknowingly lead to the betterment of society.
This idea of self-interest driving economic growth and prosperity is one of the key principles of classical economics.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Adam Smith: https://brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1
Who opposed Regan and his policies?
Answer:
Ronald Reagan was a controversial president, and his policies were opposed by a wide range of people. Some of the groups that opposed Reagan and his policies include:
* Liberals: Liberals generally opposed Reagan's conservative economic policies, such as his tax cuts for the wealthy and his deregulation of the financial industry. They also opposed his hawkish foreign policy, which they saw as unnecessarily aggressive and militaristic.
* Labor unions: Labor unions opposed Reagan's policies on a number of fronts, including his attacks on unions' right to strike and his efforts to weaken labor laws.
* Environmentalists: Environmentalists opposed Reagan's policies on a number of fronts, including his support for the development of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and his rollback of environmental regulations.
* Civil rights groups: Civil rights groups opposed Reagan's policies on a number of fronts, including his opposition to affirmative action and his support for the death penalty.
* Religious groups: Some religious groups, such as the Catholic Church, opposed Reagan's policies on a number of fronts, including his support for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua and his opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage.
It is important to note that not everyone who opposed Reagan and his policies agreed on all of the reasons for their opposition. For example, some liberals opposed Reagan's economic policies for reasons that were different from the reasons why some labor unions opposed them. Nevertheless, all of these groups played a role in opposing Reagan and his policies during his presidency.
I need help on this please answer as soon as possible I have until 2:00
Answer:
3 because he is taking about taxes and
Answer:
4 I think
Explanation:
He is the only one wanting to help businesses
what event marked the final defeat of napoleon bonaparte and the end of the violent french revolutionary era?
Battle of Waterloo marked the final defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte and the end of the violent French revolutionary era.
The Battle of Waterloo, which took place on June 18, 1815 in Belgium, was Napoleon Bonaparte's ultimate defeat after conquering much of Europe in the early nineteenth century.
During the French Revolution, Napoleon climbed through the ranks of the French army, seizing control of the French government in 1799 and becoming Emperor in 1804. He expanded his kingdom over western and central Europe during the Napoleonic Wars.
The defeat of Napoleon's soldiers at Waterloo by Prussians and British (headed by the Duke of Wellington) signified the end of his rule and France's dominance in Europe.
After capturing political power in France in a coup in 1799, he was appointed first consul and became the country's preeminent political figure.
To know more about Battle of Waterloo:
https://brainly.com/question/14540533
#SPJ1
Answer: Battle of waterloo
Explanation:
history just works like that lol
Gabrielle Widjaja
AMERICAN BORN TO CHINESE-INDONESIAN PARENTS
“My Asian-American experience is defined by memorizing the lyrics to Jay Chou songs without knowing their translations, and learning how to play mahjong, because my Mandarin proficiency starts at Chinese numbers and stops at cardinal directions. The exciting part is that one’s relationship to culture is never clearly defined. It ebbs and flows; it is constantly evolving.”
Art has always been a medium to not only express a person’s identity and journey, but also to challenge the complexities of the world at large. In recent years, amid growing discussions of media representation, defining political identities, and attacks on both people and lands, the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities have been challenged to respond to these complexities, individually and collectively.
This year, for Asian American & Pacific Islander Heritage Month, YES! asked nine illustrators to create original work responding to the following questions:
How are you connecting with your AAPI heritage right now?
What part of your AAPI heritage brings you the most pride or joy?
AAPI heritage connections vary based on personal history and interests. Ways to connect with AAPI heritage: exploring traditions, such as celebrating festivals, ceremonies, or learning about art forms.
What is the Asian-American experienceLearning AAPI languages and exploring literature by AAPI authors aids in understanding heritage and cultural roots. Family and community ties foster a sense of belonging to AAPI heritage.
Family and society connections: Spending opportunity accompanying kin, sharing lies, and engaging in in community occurrences or institutions can found a sense of belonging and relation to the AAPI tradition. Exploring AAPI cuisine connects with heritage and culture through authentic flavors and tastes.
Learn more about Asian-American experience from
https://brainly.com/question/29704274
#SPJ1
!!!! please help !!!!
What are the major trends in the time period 1450 to 1750?
The two major ones were
New foodstuffs → increased the population everywhere. (Except for the Americas where disease decimated everyone.)Migration of people → Spread of religion, new syncretic cultures. etc
What is the "unfinished work" Lincoln mentions in paragraph 3?
Reuniting the Union
Completing the cemetery
Dedicating the cemetery
Defeating Lee at Gettysburg
9.
If both the offices of the President and the
Vice President become vacant, who is next in line for
the presidency?
a. The president pro-tempore
b. The Secretary of State
c. The Speaker of the House
d. The Chief of Staff
What was the focus of the Great Society programs in the 1960s? A) to strengthen America's military B) to help the European economy recover C) to reduce poverty rates in America D) to contain communist influences abroad
The focus of the Great Society programs in the 1960s was to reduce poverty rates in America. Option C
The focus of the Great Society programs in the 1960sThe Great Society was a set of domestic programs and initiatives introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson in the mid-1960s. Its primary goal was to address social issues and promote economic opportunity for all Americans.
Through initiatives such as the Economic Opportunity Act, the Great Society programs sought to address the root causes of poverty and uplift disadvantaged communities by providing job training, employment opportunities, and access to education and healthcare.
Learn more about Great Society programs at https://brainly.com/question/15313864
#SPJ1
How does the bill of rights make America a republic government
The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution, were ratified in 1791. These changes curbed federal authority.
How does our democracy benefit from the Bill of Rights?Ten amendments make up the Bill of Rights, which restricts the federal government's authority while specifically guaranteeing certain rights and protections to US individuals. Government interference with the rights to free expression, peaceful assembly, and exercise of religion is prohibited by the First Amendment.
What did the Bill of Rights serve to protect?It outlines the rights of Americans in regard to their government. Individuals are given civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, of the press, and of religion. It establishes guidelines for legal due process and reserves all authority not granted by the people or the States to the Federal Government.
To know more about America republic government visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/12600783
#SPJ1
3 paragraph journal about U.S foreign policy during the long 19th century
Answer:
Explanation:
During the long 19th century, U.S foreign policy was characterized by territorial expansion and a desire for economic growth. The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, declared that any attempt by European powers to colonize or interfere with states in the Americas would be viewed as a hostile act. This policy was aimed at protecting the newly independent Latin American states from European influence and solidifying U.S dominance in the region.
The U.S also pursued territorial expansion through military conquest and diplomacy. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) resulted in the annexation of Texas and the cession of territory that would become California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma. The U.S also acquired Alaska from Russia in 1867 and Hawaii was annexed in 1898. These acquisitions were driven by a desire for resources, markets, and strategic military positioning.
In addition to territorial expansion, the U.S also pursued economic growth through trade agreements and intervention in Latin America. The Open Door Policy, established in 1899, called for equal trading rights for all nations in China and helped to secure U.S access to Chinese markets. The U.S also intervened militarily in several Latin American countries to protect American business interests and promote political stability. This policy became known as the Big Stick Policy and was exemplified by President Theodore Roosevelt's intervention in Panama to secure control of the Panama Canal Zone.
Overall, U.S foreign policy during the long 19th century was characterized by a desire for territorial expansion, economic growth, and political dominance in the Western Hemisphere.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names Used:
1. History.com
2. Office of the Historian - US Department of State
3. Encyclopedia Britannica
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
Write an essay on freedom of speech, explain the background of the issue, and take a stance regarding the usage rules related to the issue. Be sure your essay addresses the following points:
Explain the rule or language issue you chose. [FREEDOM OF SPEECH]
Discuss if there are times when a language rule can be broken or changed.
Explain the views of language experts on this topic. Do they agree or conflict? Is the usage rule controversial?
Include the data on usage you gather from your interactions with friends or by listening to people on the radio or on TV.
Take a clear stance about the usage rules related to the issue you chose. If possible, specify which rules seem preferable in specific contexts. Clarify whether you think following the rule is important and under which circumstances it's best to follow the rule.
Answer: Freedom of speech is a fundamental right guaranteed to all citizens in many democratic countries, including the United States. It is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states that "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech." This means that the government cannot censor or punish individuals for expressing their thoughts, opinions, or beliefs, regardless of whether those views are popular or controversial.
There are, however, limits to freedom of speech. For example, it is not protected if it incites violence or poses a clear and imminent danger to others, such as shouting "fire" in a crowded theater. In addition, some forms of speech, such as defamation, libel, and obscenity, may be restricted or criminalized.
Language experts have differing views on the issue of freedom of speech. Some argue that it is essential to protect the free exchange of ideas and to foster a healthy democracy. Others argue that certain types of speech, such as hate speech or speech that promotes discrimination, should not be protected. There is also debate about the role of social media platforms in moderating speech, with some arguing that they have a responsibility to limit harmful or violent content, while others argue that they should not censor any content as long as it is legal.
In my interactions with friends and in listening to people on the radio and on TV, I have found that there is a general consensus that freedom of speech is important, but there is disagreement about where to draw the line. Some argue that the government should be more aggressive in regulating hate speech, while others argue that this could lead to censorship and the suppression of legitimate expression.
In my view, freedom of speech is a vital part of any democratic society. It allows individuals to express their thoughts, opinions, and beliefs without fear of reprisal, and it enables the free exchange of ideas that is necessary for a healthy democracy. At the same time, I believe that there are limits to freedom of speech, particularly when it comes to hate speech or speech that incites violence. In these cases, I believe it is appropriate for the government or social media platforms to take action to prevent harm to others. Ultimately, the appropriate balance between free speech and the restriction of harmful speech will depend on the specific context and the nature of the speech in question.
Explanation: as shown above.
In which way is the US government similar to the ancient Roman govemment?