HELP!!The Nuremberg Laws helped to set the Nazi Holocaust in motion by*
1 point
forcing Jews into ghettos.
ordering the construction of death camps.
outlawing opposition to Nazi policies.
O stripping Jews of citizenship rights.
Answers
Related Questions
Which statements accurately describe northern Italian Renaissance city-states?
Answers
Explanation:
Italy was a group or the number of city-states, each of which has its own rule such as the Pope ruling in Rome, the Medici family that is ruling in Florence, the Doge basically ruling in Venice, the Sforza family served for ruling in Milan, the Este family which was ruling in the Ferrara and there is a long list that is consist of all the states of the cities and the ruling families of the ruling people.
5. Answer the following questions in 50 to 70 words. a) Discuss the tripartite struggle. b) What kind of rural government existed during the rule of the Cholas? c) Write about Amoghavarsha I of the Rashtrakuta dynasty. d) Describe the revenue system of the Cholas.
Answers
Answer:
a) The Tripartite Struggle for control of northern India took place in the ninth century, among the Pratihara Empire, the Pala Empire and the Rashtrakuta Empire and the struggle between the Pratihara Empire and the Rashtrakuta Empire had begun earlier than the struggle over Kannauj
b) The form of the Chola government was hereditary monarchy. The rule of primogeniture generally prevailed. The king generally appointed his Yuvaraja (heir) during his reign
c) Amoghavarsha was a Rashtrakuta emperor, the greatest ruler of the Rashtrakuta dynasty, and one of the great emperors of India. His reign of 64 years is one of the longest precisely dated monarchical reigns on record.
d) The revenue of the Chola kingdom came from the taxes on land and the produce of the land, and tax on trade and the part of the revenue was kept for the king and the rest were used on public works, such as the building of roads and tanks, on salaries of officials, on paying for the upkeep of the army
Hope this helps you
Which of the following best explains why immigrants and the wealthy often lived in different parts of a city?
Immigrants usually lived on the edge of cities, far from their workplaces.
Laws forced immigrants and the wealthy to live in separate parts of cities.
The wealthy preferred to live on the edge of cities, away from the working poor.
The lack of public transportation made it hard for immigrants to travel to work.
Answers
C). The wealthy preferred to live on the edge of cities, away from the working poor.
I hope this helped :)
The detail that illustrates about immigrants and the wealthy often lived in different parts of a city is the wealthy preferred to live on the edge of cities, away from the working poor. Thus, option C is correct.
What is Immigration?The worldwide movement of individuals to a destination country where they are not natives or do not have citizenship in order to settle as permanent residents or naturalized citizens is known as immigration.
Immigration has historically provided significant social, economic, and cultural benefits to governments.
Immigrants were drawn to cities by the promise of increased earnings and improved living circumstances, particularly in the steel and iron industries.
The affluent liked to dwell on the outside of cities, away from the working poor, as evidenced by the fact that immigrants and the wealthy frequently lived in separate portions of a city. As a result, option C is correct.
Learn more about the Immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ6
What are 5 Ws of the Haitian Revolution? How did the idea of Nationalism play a part?
Who:
What:
Where:
When:
(How) and Why:
Answers
Answer:
The Haitian Revolution was a successful insurrection by self-liberated slaves ... Part of the Atlantic Revolutions, French Revolutionary Wars, and Napoleonic ... 5 Leadership of Louverture.
After meeting with the leaders from several countries, the President has signed off on a treaty to reduce carbon emissions. The President must bring the treaty to
which chamber for advise and consent?
Answers
Create
create a timeline showing major events between 1871 and 1917 that are associated with the shifting
balance of power in europe and in the world. include at least six items. label each item with a short title.
(6 points)
timeline
date
1871
event
Answers
Six major events that happened between 1871 and 1917 that showed the shifting of power in Europe and the world were:
Franco-Prussian War ends in French defeat. Scamble for Africa gives Europeans more power.Battle of Adwa ends in Italian defeat. Spanish–American War ends in Spanish defeat. Russo-Japanese War ends in Russian defeat. Russian Revolution puts Communists in power.What were some major events between 1871 and 1917?
The Prussians defeated the French in 1871 and this allowed them to form the nation of Germany which would become very powerful. The Scamble for Africa started in the same decade and saw Europeans make riches from Africa.
Italy failed to colonize Ethiopia when they lost to them in 1896 at the Battle of Adwa and the Americans defeated a European power with the Spanish-American war in 198.
Japan announces its new strength by defeating the Russians in 1905 and this led to a chain of events that culminated with the Communists taking over Russia in 1917.
Find out more on the Battle of Adwa at https://brainly.com/question/16643185.
#SPJ1
Outline the changes brought aboutby the Assembly in August 1789.
Answers
The national assembly has to make change because of the revolution that has taken place
The National Assembly brought about the following changes:
(i)Louis XVI's powers were curtailed. He was now the only king of the name.
(ii) The Assembly passed a decree abolishing the feudal system of obligations and taxes on the night of August 4, 1789.
(iii) Clergy members were forced to give up their privileges.
(iv) Taxes were abolished, and the church's lands were confiscated.
To know more about the French Revolution click below
https://brainly.com/question/18326768
How do the views of Douglas and Lincoln differ about slavery? Whose view on slavery is this most closely aligned?
It is morally wrong, says it 'cheapens' us as a country
A: Abraham Lincoln
B: Stephen Douglas
C: Thomas Jefferson
Answers
Answer:
A: Abraham Lincoln
Explanation:
Douglas and Lincoln had very different opinions on slavery. Douglas thought slavery was no big deal, and that people should vote on whether they wanted it or not. He came up with this idea in a law he made in 1854, called the Kansas-Nebraska Act. He also said that slavery was going to die out anyway, because it didn't make sense in some places where it was too hard or expensive to keep slaves.
Lincoln disagreed with Douglas. He said slavery was wrong and bad, and that it went against what America stood for. He didn't want slavery to spread to new places, and he wanted to get rid of it someday. He also said that Douglas's idea of letting people vote on slavery was insane, and that the government had to stop slavery from growing. He also said that the country couldn't survive if it was half-slave and half-free, and that a crisis was inevitable.
The view on slavery that is most closely aligned with the statement “It is morally wrong, says it ‘cheapens’ us as a country” is Abraham Lincoln’s view. Lincoln used similar language in his speeches and writings to denounce slavery as a stain on the nation’s honor and conscience. For example, in his Cooper Union speech of 1860, he said: “Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith, let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.”
This statement is true, but it does not capture the full extent of Lincoln’s anti-slavery sentiments. Lincoln was not only opposed to slavery on moral grounds, but also on practical and political ones. He believed that slavery was a threat to the survival of the Union, the preservation of democracy, and the progress of humanity. He also had a sense of humor about it, and often used witty remarks to expose the absurdity and hypocrisy of the pro-slavery arguments. Here are some examples of his funny quotes on slavery:
- “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.”
- “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy.”
- “If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong.”
- “In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free.”
- “This is a world of compensations; and he who would be no slave, must consent to have no slave.”
As you can see, Lincoln was not only a great leader and statesman, but also a clever and witty speaker who used his words to persuade and inspire his audience. He was not afraid to speak his mind and stand up for what he believed in, even if it meant going against the popular opinion or risking his own life. He was truly a champion of freedom and justice for all
Therefore, the correct option is A: Abraham Lincoln.
What did the Great Council of the Magna Carta later evolve into? A: the English Parliament B: the Council of the Elect C: the House of Burgesses D: the U.S Congress Thank you if you answered this correctly.
Answers
Answer: The answer is A. English parliament
Explanation: Hope this helps!
during the cold war, american culture group of answer choices became virtually nonexistent as most wartimefinancial efforts were directed elsewhere. witnessed how the central intelligence agency and defense department emerged as patrons of the arts. was absent from the daily lives of the common men and women. faced no intervention from the national government. was not politicized.
Answers
During the Cold War, American culture faced no intervention from the national government.
While the US government did invest heavily in military and defense efforts during this time, there was no systematic effort to suppress or promote specific cultural values or expressions. However, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Department of Defense did emerge as patrons of the arts during this time, funding various cultural programs and initiatives as part of their propaganda efforts to promote American values and ideals around the world. Despite this, American culture was not politicized in a systematic way, and for the most part, it was absent from the daily lives of the common men and women. The focus during this period was largely on economic and military concerns rather than on cultural expression or development.
Learn more about During the Cold War here:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ11
After Charles Sumner delivered his famous "Crime Against Kansas" speech, how did South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks respond to Sumner's criticism of slavery and slavers?
Answers
Answer: He beat him with his cane.
Explanation:
Charles Sumner was a U.S. Senator from from Massachusetts who was strongly against slavery. In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, he denounced slavery and also criticized some lawmakers who stood for it.
Two days after the speech, Sumner was in the Senate chamber when he was attacked by Preston Brooks who was a cousin of one of the men Sumner criticized. Brooks beat him with a cane until his cane broke and then continued to beat him with the broken pieces in a display of savagery.
What is the best title for this map?
Answers
Answer:
U.S
Explanation:
IT will be the answer
YES
What forces for change were present in France, Great Britain, Belgium, Poland, and Italy between 1830 and 1848; how did each nation respond? What were the causes of the revolutions of 1848, and why did the revolutions fail?
Answers
The period between 1830 and 1848 was marked by significant political and social change in several European countries, including France, Great Britain, Belgium, Poland, and Italy. These countries experienced different forces for change and responded in varying ways.
In France, the main force for change was the growth of a middle class that sought greater political representation and power. The July Revolution of 1830 led to the installation of a constitutional monarchy and a widening of the franchise. However, tensions continued, and the revolution of 1848 saw the establishment of a republic.
In Great Britain, the main force for change was the growth of industrialization and the working-class movement. The Chartist movement emerged, demanding reforms such as universal male suffrage and the secret ballot. However, these demands were not met until later in the century.
In Belgium, the force for change was nationalism, with a desire for independence from the Netherlands. The Belgian Revolution of 1830 led to the establishment of an independent, constitutional monarchy.
In Poland, the force for change was the desire for independence from Russian control. The November Uprising of 1830 was an unsuccessful attempt to establish an independent Polish state.
In Italy, the force for change was nationalism and the desire for unification. The Risorgimento movement sought to unite Italy and establish a constitutional monarchy. However, this did not occur until later in the century.
To know more about European countries refer to-
brainly.com/question/1445755#
#SPJ11
What founding document said the American colonies were free from Britain?
Answers
Answer: declaration of independence
Explanation:
New Mexico's first settlement was established by
a. Junípero Serra.
B. Popé
c. Juan de Oñate.
d. Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo.
Answers
a. Junípero Serra.
b. Popé
c. Juan de Oñate. ✅d. Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo.
➥ I hope I have helped you, greetings!Atte: ღTheGirlSadღHow would people living in the Indian Reserve be affected if settlers ignored the Proclamation´s border
Answers
Answer:
This angered the colonists. They felt the Proclamation was a plot to keep them under the strict control of England and that the British only wanted them east of the mountains so they could keep an eye on them. As a result, colonists rebelled against this law just like they did with the mercantile laws
Explanation:
Check out my Bio for my YT channel please, 102 subscribers and trying for 1k to earn Revenue. Thank me by Subbing please. KiNg Warrior
At the time of its release in the late 1970s, what cultural group in the led to the ban of the movie in the whole of Ireland and parts of Britain, and why
Answers
In the late 1970s, the cultural group that led to the ban of the movie in the whole of Ireland and parts of Britain was the Catholic Church.
The movie in question was Monty Python's Life of Brian, a satirical comedy that depicted the life of a man mistaken for the messiah in ancient Judea. The Catholic Church found the movie blasphemous and offensive to Christianity, as it depicted Jesus Christ's story in a comedic manner.
The controversy surrounding the movie led to protests and calls for a ban from religious groups in both Ireland and Britain. In Ireland, the movie was initially granted a limited release, but after protests, it was banned by the Irish Film Censorship Board. In Britain, some local councils also banned the movie from being shown in their areas.
Despite the ban, the movie became a cult classic and was eventually allowed to be shown in Ireland and Britain after several years. The controversy surrounding the movie highlighted the tensions between religious beliefs and artistic freedom, with many arguing that censorship was a violation of free speech. Overall, the banning of Monty Python's Life of Brian by the Catholic Church remains a significant cultural moment in the history of Ireland and Britain.
Learn more about Christianity :
https://brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ11
How were the Japanese able to surprise the US at Pearl Harbor? Japanese land forces had invaded Hawaii unnoticed. Japanese submarines invaded Pearl Harbor unnoticed. Japanese airplanes had flown to the US mainland unnoticed. Japanese aircraft carriers had approached Hawaii unnoticed.
Answers
Answer:
Japanese aircraft carriers had approached Hawaii unnoticed.
The form in which Japaneses were able to surprise the US at Pearl Harbor is:
Japanese aircraft carriers had approached Hawaii unnoticed.Pearl HarborThe attack on the American base at Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Navy on December 7, 1941 had many reasons for its effectiveness, among which are:
The inadvertent approach of aircraft carriers to Hawaii.There was no declaration of war by Japan.At this, the Japanese launched their planes and sent mini submarines to attack the base, which brought about the full addition of the United States to World War II.
If you want to learn more about Pearl Harbor, you can visit the following link: https://brainly.com/question/823370
which state continued to hold slaves captive after the emancipation proclamation
Answers
Answer:
Maryland and Missouri later in the war the abolished slavery
What conclusion can be drawn about the cartoon’s artist? The artist supports imperialism. The artist is opposed to imperialism. The artist is neutral about imperialism. The artist supports imperialism in Cuba only.
Answers
Imperialism is the position where the place is ruled by the Emperor and the people are discriminated against amongst each other. In the image, the cartoon artist is depicting opposing imperialism.
What is imperialism?Imperialism can be understood as the policy of state wee the powers of the Emperor are extending over the general public.
In the image, the cartoon artist wants to show how the person is standing and waiting in front of the president for the bill fare. The artist made this cartoon to oppose such inequality due to imperialism.
Therefore, the conclusion from the cartoon is that the artist is opposed to imperialism.
Learn more about imperialism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1225474
Answer:
B
Explanation:
How did Islam spread and flourish?
Answers
in the kansas-nebraska act, stephen douglas attempted to set up territorial government on the basis of group of answer choices the compromise of 1850. free soil ideology. congressional approval or disapproval of slavery. presidential approval or disapproval of slavery. popular sovereignty.
Answers
In the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen Douglas attempted to set up a territorial government on the basis of popular sovereignty.
American politician and attorney Stephen Arnold Douglas hailed from Illinois. He was a senator and one of the Democratic Party's two candidates for president in the 1860 election, which was won by the Republican Abraham Lincoln. The Democratic Party was bitterly divided.
The Kansas-Nebraska Legislation of 1854, a territorial organic act, created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. It was drafted by Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas, passed by the 33rd Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin Pierce.
Out of worry that the issue may undermine the Republic, he advocated for the doctrine of popular sovereignty, which grants the right to a state's or territory's citizens to decide the slavery issue on their own, as a means of sustaining the Union. He led Congress's resistance to the Compromise of 1850.
To learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/21577804
#SPJ4
Identify 2 ways the French and Indian war changed the relationship between 13 colonies and Great Britain, Please be specific.
Answers
Why did unifying all southern whites around a shared sense of racial identity become more important for slave owners in the years before the Civil War
Answers
Because it helped to prevent the formation of a biracial coalition of enslaved African Americans and poor white laborers that could potentially threaten the slave system.
Unifying all southern whites around a shared sense of racial identity became more important for slave owners in the years before the Civil War because it helped to prevent the formation of a biracial coalition of enslaved African Americans and poor white laborers that could potentially threaten the slave system. By emphasizing the supposed superiority of white people, slave owners aimed to convince poor white laborers that their interests were more closely aligned with those of wealthy slave owners than with those of enslaved African Americans. Slave owners also used racial identity as a way to deflect blame for the economic hardships experienced by poor white laborers away from the slave system and onto enslaved African Americans. This strategy helped to maintain the racial hierarchy and the institution of slavery.
Learn more about coalition here
https://brainly.com/question/10252463
#SPJ11
What was the result of big sugar barons focusing just on their precious cash crops of sugar??
Answers
The result of big sugar barons focusing just on their precious cash crops of sugar was that the price of sugar decreased and the supply of sugar increased.
What happened as sugar became a major cash crop?In colonial America and the Caribbean, Big Sugar Barons decided to focus on producing sugar as a cash crop in huge quantities and selling them to Europe.
As a result of this, the supply of sugar increased massively. This led to a fall in the price of sugar as it was not longer very difficult to get. The sugar barns kept making a profit however because the demand for sugar was very stable.
In conclusion, the focus on sugar as a cash crop by sugar barons led to it having increased supply.
Find out more on cash crops at https://brainly.com/question/28375807
#SPJ1
How did Social Darwinism support American industrial progress in the late 1800s? How did it weaken industrial progress?
Answers
Answer:
By the late 1800s, however, monopolies, not competing companies, increasingly controlled the production and prices of goods in many American industries.
Explanation:
Which battles were Allied victories in the Pacific campaign? Check all that apply.
Answers
Battle of Midway
Guadalcanal Campaign
Battle of Leyte Gulf
Battle of Saipan
Battle of Iwo Jima
Battle of Okinawa
Battle of the Coral Sea
Battle of Tarawa
Battle of Peleliu
Battle of the Philippine Sea
Battle of New Guinea
Battle of Guam
Battle of Bougainville
Battle of Kwajalein
Battle of Tinian
Battle of Eniwetok
Battle of Morotai
Battle of the Eastern Solomons
Battle of Cape Gloucester
Battle of the Bismarck Sea
Explain one way in which the cultures of the gunpowder empire is differed from one another.
Answers
Answer:
The Period of the Gunpowder Empires or the Era of the Islamic Gunpowders has three major gunpowder empire Safavid, Ottoman and Mughal empires.
The cultures of these gunpowder empires are different from each other. Ottoman empire was ruling Europe whereas Safavid was ruling Iran. So, Europe use to practices Christianity instead of Islam that is practiced in Iran. Population is Europe believe in Christian rules and morals while Iran worship Islamic god.
Hence, the correct answer is "Europe use to practices Christianity instead of Islam that is practised in Iran."
Which reform measures could voters use if they wanted to change a law about taxes?
Answers
Answer:
Progressive Reform Measure
Explanation:
I took a class that described all this:)
The Puritans who founded the city of New Haven had a goal of
a. establishing it in tribute to Charles II
b. creating a haven for Quakers and other religious refugees
c. maintaining a democratic government controlled by its citizens
d. becoming self-supporting and prosperous in the fishing and fur trades
e. setting up an even closer church-state alliance than in Massachusetts
Answers
The Puritans who founded the city of New Haven had a goal of becoming self-supporting and prosperous in the fishing and fur trade (Option d).
The founders of New Haven were looking to establish a community that was not only religiously pure but also economically self-sufficient. They believed that this economic independence would allow them to maintain their religious practices without interference from outside forces.
The Puritans were focused on developing a self-reliant community that could provide for its own needs without relying on external resources. This goal was important to them because they saw economic self-sufficiency as a way to protect themselves from the influence of other cultures and beliefs.
In addition to economic independence, the founders of New Haven also sought to maintain a democratic government controlled by its citizens. However, their primary goal was to build a community that was both self-sufficient and religiously pure. Hence, D is the correct option.
You can learn more about Puritans at: brainly.com/question/17737677
#SPJ11