HEY CAN ANYONE PLS ANSWER DIS HISTORY WORK!!!!!!

Lord Shiva as Nataraja would be most recognizable to a practitioner of Hinduism in the context of which he is presented as the god of destruction and renewal.

In Hinduism, Nataraja or the Lord of Dance is a form of Lord Shiva, who is depicted as the cosmic dancer who performs his divine dance to destroy and create the universe. The Nataraja statue is a significant and iconic representation of Lord Shiva as the cosmic dancer. The statue depicts the god's four arms holding a drum, a fire, and the mudra of protection and release, with the fourth arm raised in a gesture of blessing.

Nataraja is considered as the most recognizable and significant form of Lord Shiva, and his dance symbolizes the rhythm and movement of life and the universe. This form of Shiva is significant because it represents the transformation and destruction of the universe to make way for new creation.The statue of Nataraja is widely worshipped in Hinduism and is seen as a symbol of liberation and enlightenment. The Nataraja dance is considered a metaphor for the cosmic dance of the universe, where everything is in a constant state of creation, destruction, and renewal.

Learn more about Lord Shiva: https://brainly.com/question/27769883

#SPJ11

Answer:

Floriano Peixoto

Explanation:

Answer:

he Electoral College was created by the framers of the U.S. Constitution as an alternative to electing the president by popular vote or by Congress. Each state elects the number of representatives to the Electoral College that is equal to its number of Senators—two from each state—plus its number of delegates in the House of Representatives. The District of Columbia, which has no voting representation in Congress, has three Electoral College votes. There are currently 538 electors in the Electoral College; 270 votes are needed to win the presidential election.

Several weeks after the general election, electors from each state meet in their state capitals and cast their official vote for president and vice president. The votes are then sent to the president of the U.S. Senate who, on January 6 with the entire Congress present, tallies the votes and announces the winner.

The winner of the Electoral College vote is usually the candidate who has won the popular vote. However, it is possible to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. There have been a total of five candidates who have won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College, with the most recent cases occurring in the 2016 and 2000 elections.   Two other presidents—Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876 and Benjamin Harrison in 1888—became president without winning the popular vote. In the 1824 election between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, Jackson won the popular vote but neither won a majority of Electoral College votes. Adams secured the presidency only after the election was decided by vote of the House of Representatives, a procedure provided for in the Constitution when no candidate wins a majority of the Electoral College.

The Electoral College

The Electoral College is not a place, it’s the process that tak

Explanation:

The absence of defensive walls and burned buildings in Norte Chico cities has led scholars to assert that the andean civilizations of the area were mostly peaceful.

The presence of sunken central plazas in cities like Caral suggest that residents placed a strong emphasis on communal spaces for activities such as ceremonial events. Economic self-sufficiency of Norte Chico cities such as Caral further suggest that these cities did not have to compete for key economic and natural resources with inland regions, which could lead to conflict.

Additionally, there is no evidence of tools or depictions of warfare on the clay pottery and writings of the Andean civilizations, which further backs up the assertions that these cultures favored peace and cooperation over conflict and warfare.

To know more about andean civilizations, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11156297

#SPJ4

Sport served as a fraternal epoxy in the period of nation-building by fostering a sense of unity, identity, and camaraderie among individuals, while partisanship played a role in shaping the rivalries and loyalties associated with different sports teams.

Sport has long been recognized as a unifying force, bringing people together across various social and cultural divides. During the period of nation-building, sport played a crucial role in creating a shared national identity by providing a platform for collective experiences and celebrations. Sporting events and competitions allowed individuals to rally around a common cause, instilling a sense of pride and belonging in the nation.

However, partisanship also played a significant role in this process. Partisanship refers to the strong allegiance and loyalty individuals hold towards a particular team or sports organization. This allegiance often stems from regional, cultural, or historical affiliations. Partisanship added an element of rivalry and competition to sports, fueling passions and intensifying the sense of identity and belonging. The competition between different teams or fan bases created a sense of camaraderie among supporters and further solidified the bond within the nation.

To know more about epoxy, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/31597386

#SPJ4

------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

"How and why did sport serve as a fraternal epoxy in this period of nation-building? What role did partisanship play in this regard?"-----------

Answer:

The Russian Revolution was significant because it eventually led to the takeover of the Russian government by the Bolsheviks who withdrew Russia from the war, allowing Germany to combine its troops in France.

Explanation:

Hope this helps:)

The British colonial office implemented the Rectangular System (RS) throughout the British empire. RS is a highly regulated and organized system of land demarcation, so the correct option is A.

It is designed to provide certainty and consistency for those wishing to settle land in the British colonies. In contrast, the Meters and Bounds (MB) system is a decentralized land demarcation process in which individuals define property boundaries with respect to natural features and adjacent parcels without restriction. In the US, Federal public lands were settled using a mixed system (MX) of RS and MB. Property demarcation institutions can be adapted to changing political priorities and technological advancements. This is due to the decentralized and informal nature of MB.

Here you can learn more about mixed system https://brainly.com/question/28408189

#SPJ11

Answer:

In the modern era, there are many regulations put in place by the United Nations, as well as widespread social beliefs that the power of a country’s government should not be held entirely by one person. This method of government, known as absolutism, became increasingly common in Europe during the late 1500’s and throughout the 1600’s. In countries such as France, Spain, and England, royal kings held all of the power. A very small percentage of the population owned most of the wealth, with much of the population struggling to get by. In a 1639 excerpt from his writing, King Louis XIV of France compares himself to a god, stating that “And kings are the lieutenants and gods of the people, whose divine right it is to rule.” When one king is given unlimited power over a nation’s government, military, and leadership, the people have no say, and the ruler ends up leading their nation using corrupt ways only beneficial to the upper class and himself. Thankfully, society has changed, and in most countries, the people have some sort of say over their own government and leaders.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

I'm answering it right now, I'm just commenting this so you know I'm writing the paragraph.

Answer:

Polling Place/Polling Station

Explanation:

Answer:

Direct Election

Explanation:

I just took the test

Answer:

LOOK AT IMAGE. MARK AS BRAINLIEST. TY AND PLEASE.

Answer:

Maine and Nebraska.

Explanation:

Hope this helps! <3

Answer: Genghis forged the empire by uniting nomadic tribes of the Asian steppe and creating a devastatingly effective army with fast, light, and highly coordinated cavalry. Eventually, the empire dominated Asia from the Black Sea to the Korean peninsula.

Explanation:↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑

Answer:

He combined his power base with traditional Mongol skills, horsemanship, and archery and he built an empire that would then conquer China.

Explanation:

Genghis Khan built the Mongol Empire by combining his power base with Mongol skills, horsemanship, and archery and he then built an empire that would then conquer China.

Hope this helps:))

Answer:

True

Explanation:

freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly

Answer:

I know the answer!

Explanation:

Lobbying is the profession of influencing public policy by providing lawmakers with information from a particular point of view

He bought out all other producers in the US cornering the market. This means that he was the only producer in this area of sales allowing him to have NO COMPETITION.

Explanation:

The answer to the question is C. The judge must rule in favor of whichever side made the stronger argument in a civil trial where a burden of proof that requires a preponderance of the evidence is needed.

In a civil trial, the burden of proof refers to the obligation of the plaintiff to prove their case by providing sufficient evidence. In this case, the preponderance of the evidence means that the plaintiff must show that it is more likely than not that their claim is true. The judge must assess the evidence presented by both sides and decide which one is more convincing and persuasive. The judge must consider the quality, relevance, and credibility of the evidence to make a decision. Option A is incorrect because the judge cannot rule in favor of the plaintiff solely based on the requested damages being reasonable. Option B is incorrect because the decision cannot be based on the mediator's opinion, but on the strength of the arguments presented.

In a civil trial, the burden of proof determines which party has the responsibility to prove their case by providing sufficient evidence. In most civil cases, the burden of proof lies with the plaintiff, who must convince the judge or jury that their claim is more likely than not to be true. This standard is known as the preponderance of the evidence, which means that the plaintiff must show that it is more likely than not that their claim is true.The judge must consider the evidence presented by both parties and assess which side has provided more credible and convincing evidence. The judge must evaluate the quality, relevance, and weight of the evidence and decide which side has met the preponderance of the evidence standard. The judge must also consider any legal precedents, rules, or statutes that may apply to the case. Option A is incorrect because the judge cannot rule in favor of the plaintiff solely based on the requested damages being reasonable. The plaintiff must still provide sufficient evidence to prove their case. The amount of damages requested may be relevant to the case, but it is not sufficient to meet the burden of proof.

To know more about preponderance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15023647

#SPJ11

Tsar Nicholas II of Russia abdicated, paving the way for the creation of what is now known as the Duma, a temporary government for Russia.

Tsar Nicholas II was referred to at the time as Nicholas the Bloody or Vile Nicholas. He is not scared to put to death any civilians or other government employees who defy his authority. Tsar Nicholas II's policies caused unrest among the military and civilian population of Russia, and as the years passed, public opinion of him continued to decline until, at last, he was deposed in 1917 during the revolution. The aftermath of World War I served as the catalyst for the Russian Revolution. A public rebellion that occurred in February and March 1917 prompted Tsar Nicholas II to resign.

To learn more on Russian Revolution:

https://brainly.com/question/11444621

#SPJ4

Yes, the Holy Spirit can speak apart from Scripture. While Scripture is the primary means through which the Holy Spirit communicates, it is not the only way. The Holy Spirit can also speak to individuals through various other means, such as through personal experiences, the words of others, and even through our conscience.

In the Bible, the Holy Spirit is described as a guiding and comforting presence, helping believers to discern the will of God and follow the right path. The Holy Spirit can prompt individuals to take specific actions, make certain decisions, or gain insights that may not be directly related to a specific Bible passage.

However, it is essential for believers to test the validity of any message or guidance they believe to be from the Holy Spirit against the teachings of Scripture. The Bible serves as a foundational source of truth and provides a benchmark for discerning whether or not a message aligns with the will of God. It is also important to consider the context and circumstances surrounding any perceived guidance from the Holy Spirit, as well as seeking the counsel of trusted spiritual advisors.

In summary, while the Holy Spirit can and does speak apart from Scripture, it is crucial for believers to carefully evaluate any perceived guidance in light of the teachings of the Bible and seek confirmation from others in their faith community.

Learn more about Scripture here :-

https://brainly.com/question/30066148

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hacienda, in Spanish America, a large landed estate, one of the traditional institutions of rural life. Originating in the colonial period, the hacienda survived in many places late into the 20th century. In Mexico many of the great estates were broken up as a result of the Mexican Revolution of 1911.

Explanation:

please mark ths answer as brainliest

Answer:

(in Spanish-speaking regions) a large estate or plantation with a dwelling house

Explanation:

please give me brainliest

The legal documents that were put together by the British Crown to dictate the governance of the colonies were referred to as "charters."

These documents outlined the rights and responsibilities of the colonial government, including the appointment of governors, the establishment of courts, and the granting of land to settlers. Charters were typically granted to individuals or groups who had the financial and political resources to establish a colony.

While the British Crown retained ultimate authority over the colonies, the charters granted a degree of autonomy to colonial governments, allowing them to develop their own laws and customs within the framework of British rule.

To know more about charters refer here

https://brainly.com/question/14093935#

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it's true

Explanation:

The unusually large sum of money that the city of Skokie, Illinois demanded that the Nazis post is $350,000.

In 1977, the National Socialist Party of America, a neo-Nazi group, announced plans to march in Skokie, a town with a large Jewish population. The town responded by passing ordinances that required the group to pay $350,000 for insurance to cover the cost of any damage or injuries that might result from the march.

The amount was considered unusually high, and the group was unable to pay it, leading to legal battles that lasted for several years. The case became a landmark First Amendment case, with the courts ultimately ruling in favor of the Nazi group's right to free speech.

You can learn more about National Socialist Party at

https://brainly.com/question/31371032

#SPJ11

Turkey's political system is based on a separation of powers. ... The reforms, among other measures, abolished the position of Prime Minister and designated the President as both head of state and government, effectively transforming Turkey from a parliamentary regime into a presidential one.

CAN I PLZ GET BRAINLIST

Answer:

A Movement of troops or ships

Answer:

king tutankhamen was a very important king. He ruled Egypt as a pharough for 10 years until he died at the age of 19. Studies show that he died of a brain injury from go kart racing or some type of racing. king tut was also the son of a king named Akhenaten/ king Tuts father, he ruled for 17-years although i don't remember when or how he died.

Explanation:

favorite part of history and will always remember like it was taught to me yesterday.

Answer:

Many people rebelled such as seven leading bishops who refused the king's orders to read his second Declaration of Indulgence. These bishops were arrested their rebellion. All of this lead the people of England to search for a new leader in fear of a Catholic monarchy.

Explanation:

Answer:bro easiest question in history c

Explanation:

Answer:

C: Natural resources from the east could be shipped to the west

Explanation: