Historical Question: Who was present at the signing of the Declaration of Independence?
a. Source 1: Hollywood movie about the American Revolution made in 2001.
b. Source 2: Book was written by a famous historian who is an expert on the American
Revolution, published in 1999.

Which do you trust more? Why?

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Pilate didn't really want to kill Jesus since Jesus did no wrong but the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd of people to protest and tell Pilate to kill Jesus. So Pilate gave the people a choice, to kill Jesus or a criminal named Barabbas and they chose Jesus.

Answer:

False trust me

Explanation:

yw

To write a summary report you must do an analytical reading of the text and write in your own words a concise text that has the central message of the text.

This is the idea that characterizes the entire text, it will usually be present in the introductory paragraph, or by key words that can be repeated throughout the text.

Therefore, your summary report must be written in such a way as to preserve all the original idea but in a more objective and concise way, with fundamental elements for the complete understanding of the original text.

Find out more about summary report at:

https://brainly.com/question/30199134

#SPJ1

Answer:

the Allies' desire to seek retribution for Germany's actions

Explanation:

hope this helps

After ww1 Germany was considered responsible for the war. More than 30% of its Territory was taken away, including its coal and mineral reserves. It also lost a major part of its population. It was made to pay compensation amount. I led to a huge economic loss for Germany. People became unemployed.

Manifest Destiny is the belief and ideology that emerged in the 19th century in the United States. It asserts that it was the nation's destiny and inherent right to expand its territorial boundaries from coast to coast. It was fueled by cultural, economic, and political factors, reflecting American exceptionalism. It also reflected the desire for territorial expansion.

This concept is crucial in understanding American frontier history. This is because it shaped the nation's expansionist policies and influenced politicians, settlers, and pioneers. Manifest Destiny justified the annexation of newly acquired territories, such as the Louisiana Purchase, the Texas acquisition, and the territorial gains from the Mexican-American War.

Furthermore, belief in Manifest Destiny led to the exploration and settlement of the western frontier. This was done by individuals and families seeking new opportunities, fertile lands, and economic prosperity. It played a significant role in the migration patterns and development of the American West, as it encouraged westward movement and the establishment of new towns, cities, and industries.

Moreover, Manifest Destiny ideology also had profound implications for Native American tribes and their displacement. The pursuit of territorial expansion often involved displacement, forced removal, as well as violent conflicts with indigenous peoples, as the American settlers believed it was their divine mission to occupy and "civilize" the land.

In summary, Manifest Destiny was a powerful and influential concept in American frontier history. It drove the nation's territorial expansion, influenced settlement patterns, and had far-reaching consequences for both settlers and Native Americans. Understanding this concept is essential for comprehending the motivations, actions, and conflicts that shaped the development of the United States. This is as it expanded its boundaries and solidified its identity as a continental nation.

Manifest Destiny is a term used to refer to the belief held by Americans in the 19th century that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America.

The concept of Manifest Destiny is significant for American frontier history as it is a term that refers to the set of beliefs that drove the push westward in the United States. Manifest Destiny was a key factor in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.

In conclusion, Manifest Destiny was an important concept in American frontier history as it fueled a period of territorial expansion and helped to shape the American identity. The concept of Manifest Destiny was based on the belief that the United States was destined to expand its borders and its democratic form of government throughout North America. This idea played a significant role in motivating Americans to move westward and take up land, often at the expense of Native American populations.

The idea of Manifest Destiny also contributed to the concept of the American frontier, which was a central theme in American history during the 19th century. It played a role in the belief in American exceptionalism and contributed to the belief that the United States was destined to become a world power.

In August 1967, President Lyndon B. Johnson reluctantly agreed to implement an economic policy known as the Tax Surcharge. This policy was enacted in response to an imbalanced federal budget and rising inflation during that time.

The Tax Surcharge aimed to address the budget deficit by increasing taxes on both individuals and corporations. It involved a temporary increase in income tax rates for individuals and a reduction in corporate tax breaks and deductions. The surcharge was implemented as part of the Revenue and Expenditure Control Act of 1968.

President Johnson initially resisted the idea of a tax increase, as he was focused on implementing his Great Society programs and maintaining economic growth.

Learn more about federal budget here:

brainly.com/question/31858693

#SPJ4

Answer:

.

Explanation:

.

The Cold War ended due to a combination of factors, including the internal weaknesses of the Soviet Union, strategic decisions made by political leaders, and the influence of popular uprisings and social movements.

The end of the Cold War can be attributed to several key factors. Firstly, the internal weaknesses of the Soviet Union played a significant role. By the 1970s and 1980s, the Soviet economy was struggling, and the political system was plagued by inefficiency and corruption. The reforms initiated by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, such as glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring), aimed at revitalizing the Soviet Union but inadvertently led to the unraveling of the Communist regime.

Secondly, strategic decisions made by political leaders contributed to the end of the Cold War. The willingness of U.S. President Ronald Reagan to engage in dialogue with the Soviet Union, coupled with his push for a massive arms buildup, put significant pressure on the Soviet economy. The Soviet leadership recognized the need for détente and negotiated agreements, such as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which marked a significant step toward reducing tensions.

Lastly, popular uprisings and social movements played a pivotal role in ending the Cold War. The emergence of Solidarity in Poland, led by Lech Walesa, challenged the authority of the Communist regime and inspired similar movements across Eastern Europe. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized the collapse of the Iron Curtain and the triumph of democratic aspirations.

Learn more about Cold War

brainly.com/question/12698715

#SPJ11

Answer:

One of the originators of big-band jazz, he led his band for more than 50 years and composed thousands of scores. His gift of melody and mastery of sonic textures, rhythms, and compositional forms translated into a body of music unequaled in jazz history.

Explanation:

Answer: the Chinese were motivated by a combination of Chinese attitudes, and security concerns. also to expand the communist ideology.

Explanation: So they could spread communism but not dominate in the Korean War, they also helped the Korean armies in the battle.

Answer:

ummmm where are the picture or is there one ?

The incorrect statement about the Mayflower Compact is that it gave all colonists the right to vote. Only male adult church members were allowed to vote.

The statement about the Mayflower Compact that is NOT correct is: 'it gave all colonists the right to vote'.

The Mayflower Compact was indeed an agreement that established the colonists as a united body.

However, it did not provide the right to vote to every colonist. Only male adult members of the Pilgrims' church had voting rights.

Mayflower Compact promised adult male settlers the right to vote for the Governor and his advisors each year, and It did support the idea of majority rule. But the right to vote was not extended to all colonists.

https://brainly.com/question/11377923

#SPJ2

Answer:

Dialect

Explanation:

Hope this helps

The narrator's opinion of New York society was that it had primitive thinking because, despite knowing what was proper, it continued to uphold the traditions that its forebears had passed down to it without questioning their morality.

2. The author uses words like ¨pressed,¨ ¨expected,¨ ¨obliged,¨ ¨forced,¨ and ¨plunged¨, to demonstrate how a young girl was unknowingly paired with a random man based on a random suggestion.

3. The young girl described in the excerpt, is Frank , as shown in the excerpt. This is due to the fact that she has nothing to hide or conceal, and more significantly, she is unaware that being honest has major repercussions.

4. The author foreshadow that problems will arise for the young girl depicted in the excerpt, when she quotes , '"The savage bride is dragged with shrieks from her parent's tent."

Her parents are setting the stage for her forced marriage to a stranger.

5. Wharton reflected overall trends in society ,by conveying the idea that despite people's knowledge of what has to be done, they often make poor decisions as a result of worrying about what other people would think.

To know more about Society visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12006768

#SPJ1

True, European colonial regimes commonly instituted controls on native people's use of natural resources.

European colonial powers often implemented strict regulations on the use and access of natural resources within their colonies. These controls were designed to ensure the optimal exploitation of these resources for the benefit of the colonizing power, frequently disregarding the needs and traditions of the native populations. As a result, indigenous communities often experienced significant disruptions to their livelihoods and cultural practices.

These resource controls took various forms, such as establishing monopolies over key industries like mining, forestry, and agriculture, or implementing systems of land tenure that limited native peoples' rights to access and utilize their ancestral lands. Additionally, colonial powers often imposed taxes and levies on native communities to further exert control and profit from the use of these resources.

Such colonial resource management policies frequently led to the depletion of natural resources, environmental degradation, and long-term socioeconomic consequences for the affected native populations. These impacts continue to shape the political, economic, and environmental realities of many post-colonial nations today.

In conclusion, it is accurate to state that European colonial regimes commonly instituted controls on native people's use of natural resources, often leading to significant negative consequences for both the environment and the indigenous communities involved.

know more about monopoly here;

https://brainly.com/question/31685166

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

if our nation is talking about america then yes we did. we got attacked by the Japanese in pearl harbor

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation: it makes sense who wouldn't choose this answer if you dont choose this ill make you not a member of one of the cool kids >B)

The local communist parties that came to power in Eastern Europe did not primarily originate from the Soviet Union.

While the socialist legislatures in Eastern Europe were intently attached to the Soviet Association, not all parts of these states began from the Soviet Association. One part that didn't fundamentally come from the Soviet Association was the neighborhood socialist coalitions that came to drive in these nations.

In most Eastern European nations, socialist factions were at that point laid out before the Soviet Association's impact started to develop. These gatherings had their own chronicles, philosophies, and pioneers, and they assumed a critical part in forming the strategies of socialist states in Eastern Europe.

For instance, the Clean Joined Laborers' Party, which controlled Poland from 1948 to 1989, had its underlying foundations in the pre-war Socialist Coalition of Poland, while the Communist Solidarity Party of Germany, which managed East Germany from 1949 to 1989, was a consolidation of the Socialist Faction of Germany and the Social Leftist alliance.

Besides, while the Soviet Association gave military and monetary guide to Eastern European nations, these nations frequently had their own homegrown arrangements, social personalities, and social designs that were unmistakable from the Soviet Association.

Accordingly, the socialist states in Eastern Europe were not just duplicates of the Soviet model yet were molded by neighborhood variables and customs.

To learn more about Soviet Union, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/12448434

#SPJ4

As a result of the attack by Natives on Oñate's men at Acoma, a. 10 men, including Oñate's nephew, were killed.

In 1598, an incident occurred where:

The incident occurred in Acoma and infuriated Oñate such that in the following year, the Spanish attacked Acoma and slaughtered around 800 Natives.

In conclusion, option A is correct.

Find out more about the Juan de Oñate at  https://brainly.com/question/7554073.

Answer:

Explanation:

Worship the God of Abraham.

Answer:

They had to pick cotton for a living and if they didn't they were whipped by white slave owners/slave buyers

Explanation:

(enslaved, enslave): verb - cause (someone) to lose their freedom of choice or action or to make (someone) a slave.

Gold and silver, which were used to finance Spain's wars and which stimulated further colonization.

The heightened popular distrust for the government and intensified opposition to the war during the Johnson administration can be largely attributed to several factors. One key factor was the ongoing Vietnam War, which was a highly controversial conflict.

The American public became increasingly disillusioned with the war due to the high number of casualties, the government's handling of the conflict, and the perception that the war was unnecessary.

1. The Vietnam War: The war itself played a significant role in the public's growing distrust of the government. As the conflict dragged on, more American soldiers were being sent to fight and die in Vietnam, leading to a rising number of casualties. This caused many Americans to question the government's decision to continue the war and fueled opposition to the conflict.

2. Government handling: The government's handling of the war also contributed to the public's distrust. The Johnson administration was seen as misleading the public about the progress of the war and the reasons for U.S. involvement. This created a sense of betrayal and eroded trust in the government's actions.

3. Opposition movement: The anti-war movement, which gained momentum during this period, also fueled the popular distrust. The movement included protests, demonstrations, and acts of civil disobedience, all aimed at expressing opposition to the war. These activities received widespread media coverage and helped shape public opinion, leading to increased skepticism towards the government's actions.

4. Media coverage: The media played a crucial role in shaping public perception of the war. Journalists reported on the realities of the conflict, including the high number of casualties and the government's failures. This led to a broader awareness of the negative aspects of the war and contributed to the growing opposition.

In conclusion, the heightened popular distrust for the government and intensified opposition to the war during the Johnson administration can be attributed to several factors. These include the Vietnam War itself, the government's handling of the conflict, the anti-war movement, and media coverage. The combination of these factors eroded public trust and fueled widespread opposition to the war.

To know more about Vietnam War visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31746600

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

I did the assignment

Answer:

A) to ensure the safety of citizens and their belongings

Explanation:

Answer:

Lo me dusa at trica dudlenotbut

Explanation:

do you understand?

Answer: the Colonial Period.

Explanation:

Answer:

Georgia, during the colonial period!

Explanation:

Answer:

Military power.

Explanation:

Babur conquered Delhi's Turkish Ghur'iat Sultanate in 1526 and imposed his rule over much of Northern India. The Empire he established was a complex, religiously tolerant society. It was also called the gunpowder empire because it was the use of cannons which have saved the day for Babur. however, it was the third emperor on the lineage, Akbar who was able to broaden the empire in all directions through warfare and diplomacy.