how come people say violence is not the answer but like cheack your history books almost everything was solved with violence

Answer:

his promotion of critical thinkng and reason

Explanation:

That i sthe right answer trust me

Many African countries faced a number of problems after achieving independence from colonial rule. Some of the most significant problems include:

Political instability: Many countries experienced frequent coups, civil wars and political violence, which hindered development and hindered the ability of governments to provide basic services and stability for their citizens.

Economic challenges: Many African countries were facing major economic challenges such as high levels of poverty, unemployment, and low levels of economic growth.

Lack of infrastructure: Many countries had inadequate infrastructure, such as poor transportation and communication networks, which hindered economic development and made it difficult for people to access basic services like healthcare and education.

Dependence on exports: Many countries were heavily dependent on exports of primary commodities, such as crops and minerals, which made their economies vulnerable to fluctuations in the global market.

Corruption: Many countries were plagued by high levels of corruption, which hindered economic development and made it difficult for governments to provide essential services to their citizens.

Ethnic and tribal conflicts: Many countries faced ethnic and tribal conflicts which hindered national unity and stability.

Environmental degradation: Many countries were facing severe environmental challenges such as deforestation, desertification, and soil erosion, which hindered sustainable development.

Lack of education: Many countries had high rates of illiteracy, which hindered the development of human capital and hindered the ability of citizens to participate fully in the economy and society.

In summary, after achieving independence, African countries faced a range of challenges including political instability, economic challenges, lack of infrastructure, dependence on exports, corruption, ethnic and tribal conflicts, environmental degradation, and lack of education.

The European Renaissance had a more overtly religious cast to it than the Italian Renaissance due to several reasons. Firstly, Europe was more deeply rooted in Christianity than Italy, where the Renaissance began.

The religious influence in Europe was reflected in the art and architecture of the time, which often featured religious themes and motifs. Additionally, the European Renaissance was a response to the Protestant Reformation, which sought to reform the Catholic Church. This religious conflict gave rise to a renewed interest in theology and religious themes, which were also reflected in the art and literature of the time. Overall, the European Renaissance was more overtly religious due to the deeply ingrained religious traditions in Europe and the religious conflicts of the time. The European Renaissance had a more overtly religious cast to it than the Italian Renaissance because the European movement was strongly influenced by the Protestant Reformation, which sought to reform the Roman Catholic Church and led to the establishment of various Protestant denominations.

To know more about Reformation refer :
brainly.com/question/30039680

#SPJ11

Answer:

Please don't cheat Elina, it isn't worth it, what do you gain?

Explanation:

Rather than eating hot cheetos and facetiming your friends such as hi*za and reb***a you should study! Studying is the key to success rather than gossip and other stuff. The answer is wisdom, nothing less and nothing more. Go on the right path to success not the wrong way. Oh and, I ain't never seen two pretty best friends, it's always one of them that gotta be ugly.

That is correct. The United States had a tremendous output of military supplies during World War II, producing an estimated 90 percent of the allied nations' total military equipment.

This massive production effort greatly contributed to the success of the Allied forces in the conflict.This was achieved through a combination of government funding and cooperation with private industries, as well as the use of innovative manufacturing methods and assembly line techniques. The sheer volume of production allowed the US to supply its own military as well as its allies, and played a crucial role in the ultimate victory over the Axis powers.

Learn more about tremendous output here:https://brainly.com/question/13013945

#SPJ11

Answer:

According to the search results, the correct answers to the question "How did Renaissance art differ from medieval art? Select all correct answers." are:

Renaissance art appeared flat , while art of the Middle Ages used light , perspective, and depth.

Artists of the Renaissance used a very limited number of colors compared to art of the Middle Ages.

Artists of the Renaissance made figures look solid and lifelike by using light and shadow.

Figures in Renaissance art were shown in realistic proportions and positions.

Therefore , all of the above statements are correct.

Explanation:

Settlement societies were organized into groups of people who all worked together.

To know more about hunter-gatherer societies  refer:

https://brainly.com/question/17193873

#SPJ1

Metternich and Talleyrand were two prominent figures in European history who played significant roles in shaping the political landscape of their respective countries and the continent as a whole.

Klemens von Metternich was an Austrian diplomat and statesman who served as the Chancellor of Austria from 1809 to 1848. He was a key figure in the Congress of Vienna, which aimed to restore stability and order in Europe after the Napoleonic wars. Metternich was a staunch conservative who believed in the importance of maintaining the status quo and suppressing revolutionary movements. He was known for his advocacy of the principle of legitimacy, which held that the legitimate rulers of Europe should be restored to their thrones and that the balance of power should be maintained to prevent any one nation from becoming too dominant. Metternich's ideas and policies had a significant impact on the course of European history, particularly in the 19th century.

Charles Maurice de Talleyrand was a French diplomat and statesman who served under several different regimes, including the Bourbon Restoration, the July Monarchy, and the Second French Empire. He was known for his political acumen and skillful diplomacy, which enabled him to maintain his influence and power despite the changing political landscape of France. Talleyrand played a key role in negotiating the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Napoleonic Wars, and was instrumental in securing French support for the Congress of Vienna. He was also a vocal advocate of liberalism and constitutional government, which put him at odds with many of his conservative colleagues. Talleyrand's influence extended beyond France, as he was involved in negotiations and diplomacy on behalf of several other European nations.

In summary, Metternich and Talleyrand were important figures in European history who played key roles in shaping the political landscape of their respective countries and the continent as a whole. Metternich was a conservative who believed in maintaining the status quo and suppressing revolutionary movements, while Talleyrand was a skilled diplomat who advocated for liberalism and constitutional government. Both were instrumental in negotiating the Congress of Vienna and securing peace and stability in Europe after the Napoleonic Wars.

for more such questions on Napoleonic wars.

https://brainly.com/question/3762276

#SPJ11

The way the details support the central idea is that they provide examples of how France gradually became a place for worldwide trade.

This refers to the use of evidence to show that a claim is valid and includes the use of factual or statistical information.

Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration of the use of sugar plantations and how they helped to enhance trade in France as the sugar cane became increasingly popular.

Read more about How Sugar Changed The World here:

https://brainly.com/question/16944707

#SPJ1

In Afghanistan, the members of the hijacking teams train. option (A) is correct.

Following their preparation at al-Qaeda instructional courses in Afghanistan, they were picked by Container Loaded and al-Qaeda's tactical wing because of their broad information on Western culture and language abilities, expanding the mission's functional security and its opportunities for progress.

The fourth planned pilot, Ramzi Canister al-Shibh, an individual from the Hamburg cell, likewise decided to take part in the assaults yet couldn't get a visa for a section into the US. He was subsequently supplanted by Hani Hanjour, a Saudi public.

Therefore, option (A) is correct.

Learn more about hijacking:

https://brainly.com/question/27021767

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

In what nation did the members of the hijacking teams train?

(A) Afghanistan

(B) Pakistan

(C) United states

The correct option is b. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) regulates communication infrastructure.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates communication infrastructures in the United States. The FCC is an independent federal agency that's responsible for regulating the use of radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable communication within the country. The FCC regulates almost every aspect of communication in the US. It has several areas of focus, including broadband, public safety, competition, media ownership, and cybersecurity.

The FCC ensures that communication services are available to everyone, regardless of their location or ability to pay. It also ensures that communication service providers follow certain guidelines and rules regarding customer privacy, data security, and competition. This is to prevent service providers from engaging in anti-competitive behaviors that could stifle innovation or harm consumers. Overall, the FCC's primary goal is to promote innovation, competition, and access to communication services across the country.

To know more about the Federal Communications Commission visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27337881

#SPJ11

Answer: 2 causes for the war was the British limited American trade with Europe and america wanted to expand its territory. i might be wrong though.

It displayed the Boston Massacre and emphasized how merciless and vicious the British soldiers were during the combat.

In Boston in 1770, the engraving first appeared. Given that it occurred three weeks after the massacre, I believe this has an impact on the meaning. It demonstrates how badly Revere wanted to revolt against the British troops, which I believe has an impact on the meaning.

Since 1768, British troops had been stationed in the Province of Massachusetts Bay to support officials nominated by the monarch and execute unpopular laws passed by Parliament.

Thus, It displayed the Boston Massacre and emphasized how merciless and vicious.

For more information about Paul Revere's engraving first appea, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17265269

#SPJ1

Option A. Indians were not incorporated as citizens within the new republic is not the case for American Indians following the War of Independence.

Instead, American Indians faced various challenges and injustices following the War of Independence. Option B accurately points out that Indian lands were increasingly encroached upon by American settlers. As the United States expanded westward, settlers moved onto traditional Indian territories, leading to conflicts and the gradual loss of land for Native American tribes.

Option C highlights the signing of treaties between American Indian tribes and the United States government. These treaties aimed to establish boundaries, maintain peace, and regulate trade. However, it's important to note that many of these treaties were eventually violated or disregarded by the U.S. government, leading to further land loss and conflicts with Native American tribes.

Option D correctly states that many American Indian tribes faced forced relocation and removal from their ancestral lands. The most infamous example of this is the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which resulted in the forced removal of several tribes, including the Cherokee Nation along the Trail of Tears.

Overall, the post-war period brought significant challenges for American Indians. Their lands were taken, treaties were often broken, and they faced forced relocation. Despite their contributions and alliances during the war, American Indians did not receive equal rights or citizenship within the new republic. It was not until much later, with the passage of the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924, that American Indians were granted full citizenship in the United States. Therefore, Option A is Correct.

Know more about the War of Independence here:

https://brainly.com/question/196810

#SPJ8

The question was Incomplete, Find the full content below:

Which was not the case for american indians following the War of Independence?

A. Indians were incorporated as citizens within the new republic.

B. Indian lands were increasingly encroached upon by American settlers.

C. Treaties were signed between American Indian tribes and the United States government.

D. Many American Indian tribes faced forced relocation and removal from their ancestral lands.

The executive department that would most likely give advice on treaties with other countries is A. The Department of State.

This is the executive department that deals with foreign relations and enforces the foreign policy of the government.

They are therefore the best placed to advise the president on any issues relating to other nations including treaties.

Find out more on the Department of State at https://brainly.com/question/1851355.

#SPJ1

In the article "US Mexican War: Cultural Violence" by Antonia Castañeda, "cultural violence" means systematic eradication, repression, and devaluation of the cultural identities, languages, traditions, and ways of life of Mexican and Indigenous communities after the US- Mecian war era.

It occurred in various forms of violence such as land confiscation, forced migration, family and kids separation, suppression of language and cultural practices, denial of citizenship and dehumanization of communities.

Cultural violence showed that wars were not aimed solely at territorial conquest and economic gain, but also at damaging and erasing the cultural heritage and identities of the conquered peoples. 

To learn more about Mexican American war:

https://brainly.com/question/27413640

#SPJ4

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine is the best known U.S. policy toward the Western Hemisphere. Buried in a routine annual message delivered to Congress by President James Monroe in December 1823, the doctrine warns European nations that the United States would not tolerate further colonization or puppet monarchs.

Explanation:

Answer:

when Columbus first discovered the new land they thought the had found a new route to Asia but they actually found what is now America.

HOPE THIS HELPS !!!!!

ps. i have had many rude comment on my previous answers so i ask pls don't comment rude things on other peoples answers. thx you. UwU

Answer:

When Columbus first discovered the new land they were meant to get a reward for finding the land, but Columbus took credit from one of the other sailors for finding the land.

Explanation:

I did this on edgenuity and got an 100 percent score. :)) Also if this is wrong on your I'm sorry.

Under the doctrine of strict product liability, a manufacturer can be held liable even if when the product was introduced everyone agreed it was safe.

Strict product liability holds manufacturers responsible for injuries or damages caused by their products, regardless of whether the manufacturer was negligent or knew about the defect. The focus is on the safety of the product itself, rather than the manufacturer's conduct. Therefore, even if the manufacturer believed the product was safe when it was introduced, they can still be held liable if a defect is discovered later on that causes harm to the consumer.

Learn more about doctrine of strict product liability: https://brainly.com/question/30830242

#SPJ11

C. The United States

The United States tried its hardest to stay 'neutral', even going as far as providing weapons to both sides of the war. It wasn't until Germany sank neutral ships and killed US passengers on them, and blockaded the UK of neutral ships that the US joined the war.

Answer:

C. The United States didn't want to be involved with World War One

Answer:

Desertification is a problem in Africa because people are cutting down trees and not replanting them. This is causing the soil to become less fertile and more sandy. Desertification is also caused by overgrazing, which is when animals eat too much of the grass and other plants in an area. This leaves the ground bare and exposed to the wind and sun, which makes it more likely to become a desert. Climate change is also causing desertification in Africa, as it is making the weather more extreme and making it harder for plants to grow.

Explanation:

Give Brainliest if I helped!

Answer:

Thesis statement: The outcomes of World War 1, including the Treaty of Versailles, the formation of the League of Nations, and the economic, political, and social upheavals that followed, did little to address the underlying tensions that had contributed to the outbreak of war in 1914, instead setting the stage for future conflicts and ultimately leading to the Second World War.

Explanation:

One of the hallmarks of the world's superpowers between the 1940s and 1980s was the rise of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, as well as increased tension between the two countries.

These two countries disputed control of various regions of the world and faced each other in various conflicts through allies or directly between them. This is something that has never been seen before. This tension between the United States and the Soviet Union caused much of the political instability globally, leading to further militarization and the spread of the Cold War.

This competition between the United States and the Soviet Union also led to an increase in the development of nuclear weapons, something that had never been seen before. This created a new era of danger and fear worldwide. These distinctive features of the superpowers of this era marked a major shift in world history, as they led to a significant increase in the military and diplomatic power of the United States and the Soviet Union, and increased international instability.

Lear More About The Superpowers of the ancient and current world

https://brainly.com/question/15736355

#SPJ11

Answer:

Brian Epstein is the manager of the Beatles.

Explanation:

hope it will help ^_^

Answer:

Brian Epstein.

Explanation:

Hope this helped

The description that LEAST likely accounts for the dramatic shifts in birth and mortality rates during the Great Leap Forward is B) The Third Plague, an influenza pandemic, swept through China in this period of time.

The Great Leap Forward was a period of radical social and economic change in China initiated by Mao Zedong in 1958. The period was marked by a series of reforms designed to modernize the country and increase food production. However, the reforms were poorly executed, resulting in widespread famine, mass migrations, and ultimately a significant death toll.

Several factors contributed to the dramatic shifts in birth and mortality rates during this period. A and D are both plausible factors that could have contributed to the shifts in birth and death rates. The forced redistribution of food from farmers to city dwellers or for export (A) and the forced collectivization of farms and the dismantling of family units (D) could have both contributed to malnutrition, starvation and ultimately increased mortality rates. Additionally, widespread famine and poor planning could also have significantly lower yields on Chinese farms, resulting in increased mortality rates (C).

Option B, however, seems unlikely as a cause because the Third Plague (or flu pandemic) is not known to have had a major impact on China or the world in the late 1950s when the Great Leap Forward policies were being implemented. While pandemics can, of course, have an impact on birth and death rates, it is not a plausible direct explanation for the shifts in birth and mortality rates during the Great Leap Forward.

In conclusion, during the Great Leap Forward period, a variety of factors contributed to the dramatic shifts in birth and mortality rates observed in the chart. While some factors, such as poor planning, forced redistribution of resources, and collectivization, were likely contributory factors, the influenza pandemic (Third Plague) is the least likely explanation for the observed shifts.

To know more about influenza pandemic, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4035897

#SPJ11

Answer:

Hey mate.....

Explanation:

This is ur answer.....

1. Marc never lost an opportunity to castigate colonialism.

2. The town grew under the influence of colonialism.

3.It is interesting to reflect why European colonialism ended.

4. Colonialism has left an indelible imprint on the island.

Hope it helps!

Brainliest pls!

Follow me! :)

Based on the information provided about the judicial nominee candidates, it is difficult to come to a consensus on whether they might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint. Each candidate has their own unique set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to decision-making on the bench.

Honorable Jessica Jenulis appears to have a consistent moderate to conservative viewpoint, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, she has also ruled in favor of individual rights and against gerrymandering, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism when necessary.

Ana Maria Garcia, Esq. has no judicial experience, but her legal writings suggest that she may be inclined towards judicial restraint, as she appears to be in favor of letting states decide on issues such as gay marriage and abortion restrictions.

Honorable Marianne Olson seems to generally use stare decisis and respect precedents, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, she has also consistently ruled in favor of businesses over workers and has come under criticism for her refusal to prosecute cases of police brutality towards minorities, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

Honorable Dustin Burridge III has a strongly conservative ideology and a strict originalist interpretation of the Constitution, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, the Affordable Care Act, and his pro-business/anti-labor/anti-environmental rulings could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

Honorable Richard Kleinhaus also appears to have a conservative ideology and generally uses stare decisis and respects precedents, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, his pro-gun rights stance, and his pro-business/anti-environmental/anti-labor rulings could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

In conclusion, it is difficult to come to a consensus on whether the judicial nominee candidates might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint, as each candidate has their own unique set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to decision-making on the bench.

#SPJ1

Similar Question: https://brainly.com/question/29663635

It is difficult to agree on whether the judicial nominee candidates might engage in judicial activism or restraint based on the information provided about them.

The way they make decisions on the bench may be influenced by the beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends of each candidate.

The fact that the Honorable Jessica Jenulis seems to consistently hold a moderate to conservative viewpoint may indicate a preference for judicial restraint. However, she has also ruled against gerrymandering and in favor of individual rights, suggesting a willingness to engage in judicial activism when necessary.

Attorney Ana Maria Garcia possesses no judicial experience, but her legal writings appear to favor allowing states to decide on issues like gay marriage and abortion restrictions, suggesting that she may favor judicial restraint.

The fact that Honorable Marianne Olson frequently appears to use stare decisis and to respect precedents may indicate a preference for judicial restraint. However, she has also been criticized for her refusal to prosecute cases of police brutality against minorities, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism. Additionally, she has consistently ruled in favor of businesses over workers.

The ideology and strict originalist interpretation of the Constitution held by Honorable Dustin Burridge III may point to a tendency toward judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, the Affordable Care Act, and his rulings in favor of business, labor, and the environment may suggest that he is open to judicial activism.

The fact that Honorable Richard Kleinhaus generally adheres to stare decisis and respects precedents, as well as his apparent conservatism, may point to a tendency toward judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, support for gun rights, and pro-business, anti-environmental, and anti-labor rulings may suggest that he is open to judicial activism.

In conclusion, it is difficult to reach a consensus regarding whether the candidates for the position of judicial nominee might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint because each candidate has their own distinct set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to making decisions on the bench. As a result, it is difficult to reach a consensus regarding this issue.

Learn more about judicial nominee:

brainly.com/question/14035872

#SPJ1

Answer:

I think it is B

Explanation: