How could Roman slaves escape from slavery?

Answer:

Free states had 96 representatives in the House, but the slave states had only 79 representatives in 1800.

In 1820, free states had 123 representatives, which was 44 more representatives than slave states had.

Between the years 1840 and 1850, the free states experienced the greatest increase in the number of representatives, an increase of 7 members.

The percentage of members from slave states was 47.3 percent in 1800 and 41.7 percent in 1850.

The trend in the number of representatives for free states was an overall increase.

The trend in the number of representatives for slave states was an overall decrease.

Answer:

Explanation:

1) He kicked Jews out of work, school and other public establishment, as well as killing them if they refused to leave

2) The whole idea of concentration camps where based around Jews, to keep they away from the public eye

3) Anyone found hiding Jews from the German army could be killed on the charge of treason  

Answer:

Explanation

There was no one process of decolonization. But in a few areas it was orderly, and peaceful!

She was banished from the colonies due to holding a unusual view of the religion

The clergy thought that she was a threat to the colonies as well

She was also accused of  slandering the church

Answer:

They made her leave the colonies and she couldn't return.

Answer: Pygmies and Sumanguru

Explanation:

took the test

Answer:

Pygmies and Sumanguru

Explanation:

Answer:

Communism is a threat to american

Explanation:

The most comprehensive estimates of the economic costs of the war are those developed by Claudia Goldin and Frank Lewis. Their estimates suggest that government expenditures by both governments totaled $3.3 billion; the estimated “value” of human capital lost because of deaths in the war was $2.2 billion; and the Physical destruction was just under $1.5 billion. The total bill for the war came to $7 billion – or roughly two full years of GDP in 1860. What stands out from these numbers is not only the absolute magnitude of the costs, but also the disparity in the burden that these costs represented to the people in the North and the South. On a per capita basis, the costs to the Northern population were about $139 – or just slightly less than a year’s per capita GDP the income of the United States economy in 1860. The per capita burden on Southerners was almost three times that amount.

The Union had a clear advantage in the “economics” of this war. It not only had a population roughly three times the free white population of the Confederacy, it also had the advantage of larger and far more sophisticated market institutions with which to organize its war effort. However, neither side was prepared to raise the revenues required to cover the soaring costs of the war, and it took the better part of a year for each side to “mobilize”. By the spring of 1862 it was apparent that both would have to resort to a combination of taxation, selling bonds (if they could find anyone willing to buy them), and the issuance of various forms of paper money. Figures 2 and 3 present estimates of the revenues collected by each side to “pay” for the war.

The figures present estimates for revenues raised through taxes, revenues raised by issuing treasury notes as fiat currency, i.e. not backed by or convertible into gold but only backed by silver, and revenues from interest-bearing debt that was sold to private buyers. The dotted line indicates the total revenues adjusted for inflation.

The first thing to note is the extent to which both sides were forced to rely on deficit finance to pay for the war. The Union did succeed in increasing tax revenues by enacting a higher tariff, and higher excise taxes, and passing a tax on incomes above $10,000 per year. Even so, tax revenues accounted for only about a quarter of all federal revenues during the war. Confederates were much less successful in their efforts to obtain tax revenues. They inherited a tax system where tariffs had accounted for three-fourths or more of the federal government’s revenues each year. That tax base quickly eroded away as the effectiveness of the Union blockade increased. Over the course of the war, taxes and assorted revenues accounted for less than 10% of total revenue. With limited possibilities of selling bonds, the Confederates were forced to rely on the printing of money as the primary means of paying their bills. The result of that policy was an inflationary spiral that eventually reached a point where prices were more than 9,000 times their level at the beginning of the war. Inflation played a role in the financial struggles of both governments. In the North prices reached a level in 1865 that was roughly twice the level in 1860. Despite the increase in prices, revenues collected by the Union government rose steadily throughout the war. Inflation imposed a significant “tax” on Northern consumers, but it did not seriously affect the war effort.

The same cannot be said of the Confederate mobilization efforts. Figure 4 charts the overall rise in commodity prices; it also portrays the impact of the blockade on imported goods—a situation that weighed heavily on the minds of consumers used to getting a variety of their consumption items from abroad. Finally, we can see that the level of the agricultural prices—which comprised the principal source of income for the rural South—lagged behind the costs of other goods. These developments not only drained the morale of Confederates on the home front, they also crippled the Confederate war effort Measured in 1861 prices, the flow of funds to the Richmond government reached their peak by early 1862, remained fairly stable through the middle of 1863, and then declined steadily thereafter. For all intents and purposes, the Confederacy had been reduced to a barter economy by the time Lee surrendered his army at Appomattox.

Answer:

i think its A

Explanation:

In explaining the need for an independent judiciary, Alexander Hamilton noted in The Federalist # 78 that the federal courts "were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and their legislature" in order to ensure that the people's representatives acted only within the authority given to Congress under the Constitution.

Answer:

If there is no access to water the population may go down due to a lack of basic needs such as food and water. The drought may be caused by a lack of rainfall, a high-heat climate, and streams and rivers drying up. If texas experienced a major drought it could possibly be fatal to many because of, again, a lack of basic needs such as vegetables/farmed goods and water. In the event texas experiences a major flood there may be a lack of agriculture because of plants and animals drowning as well as many people losing their homes and other property.

Explanation:

I disagree/agree with (person name). This is because (your opinion here).

Answer:

1. Man

2. Make Alliances

3. Alliances, kin, and support

4. Marriage customs differ (if not, then environments differ)

Answer:

a

Explanation:

because the number of people that have been naturalize in the u.s went down

Answer:

B. Atlas Mountains

Explanation:

I need twenty characters long

Answer:

D

Explanation:

She helped English settlers Louis and Clark and for that she is an important part of our early American history

Answer:

B. Neither the federal government nor the state governments can restrict ones freedom of speech as long as it does not incite violence, thats the whole point of the first amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

Guyana, bauxite

Venezuela, Petroleum

French Guiana, spices

Brazil, coffee

Explanation:

Guyana, bauxite

Venezuela, Petroleum

French Guiana, spices

Brazil, coffee

Answer:

They favored weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy

Explanation:

Answer: Feudalism developed in Europe because they wanted ensured safety due to invasions, and there was a weak central government.

Explanation:

Answer:

The people of Athens relied on sea trade.

While the Athenian economy depended on trade, Sparta's economy relied on farming and on conquering other people. Sparta didn't have enough land to feed all its people, so Spartans took the land they needed from their neighbors.

Explanation:

Answer:

Some negative things people will try to do to persuade others to join their friend group is: lying to your face to make it seem like they are cool or to think they are better than most people. Another horrible thing they will do is steal stuff from you and blame it on someone else. Just to make you join their horrible group, and being friends with liars and stealers. They cheat you out of your emotions, they peer pressure you, they make you feel bad. These are all negative things people could/would do to you to make you guys become friends.

Explanation:

Answer:

In a unitary system of government, the national government is in charge and has all the authority. There may be local and state governments, but their power is constrained, and they are bound by choices made by the federal government. In contrast, a federal government structure gives municipal and state governments more autonomy and control over decision-making. For instance, each state in the United States has its own government and set of laws, but is still under the control of the federal government. As a result, there can be a wider variety of laws and policies throughout the nation because each state can customize its laws to meet its own requirements and ideals. I grew up in a state that had different rules and laws than its bordering states.

Answer:

Augustus is said to have boasted that he “found Rome brick and left it marble.” ... This epic poem was meant to glorify Augustus and Rome.

Explanation:

Answer:

Triangular trade benefited European nations because it opened new markets for their own goods, so probably #3, but i dont really know

Answer:

its A

Explanation: