Answers
Answer:
Radicalisation is when someone starts to believe or support extreme views, and in some cases, then participates in terrorist groups or acts. It can be motivated by a range of factors, including ideologies, religious beliefs, political beliefs and prejudices against particular groups of people.
One of the key factors in radicalization is exposure to extremist ideology. This may occur through social networks, the internet, or exposure to extremist propaganda. Individuals who are socially isolated or who feel marginalized or disenfranchised may be more susceptible to extremist messages.
Another factor that may contribute to radicalization is a sense of grievance or injustice. This may be related to political or social issues, such as discrimination, poverty, or government corruption. Individuals who feel that they have been wronged or who identify strongly with a particular group may be more likely to become radicalized.
Research suggests that radicalization is a complex and multifaceted process that may involve a combination of personal, social, and environmental factors. It may be influenced by psychological factors, such as a need for identity or a sense of belonging, as well as political and social factors, such as exposure to extremist ideology and a sense of grievance or injustice.
It is important to note that not all individuals who are exposed to extremist ideology become radicalized. Many factors may influence an individual's susceptibility to radicalization, including their personal beliefs, social networks,and life experiences. Additionally, many individuals who are exposed to extremist ideology may reject it or become disillusioned with it over time.
It is also important to emphasize that terrorism and any associated activities are illegal and morally reprehensible. Furthermore, the use of violence and harm to innocent people is never justified, and it is important to reject and condemn any form of terrorism.
Governments and organizations around the world work to prevent radicalization and terrorism by addressing the root causes of these phenomena, promoting social inclusion and tolerance, and providing support and resources to individuals who may be vulnerable to radicalization. By promoting inclusive and tolerant societies and addressing the underlying factors that contribute to radicalization, we can work towards a more peaceful and just world for all.
Related Questions
Which party was held responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson?
Group of answer choices
a) Ms. Donoghue's friend who bought her the bottle of ginger beer.
b) The manufacturer of the ginger beer.
c)The retailer who sold the bottle of ginger beer to Ms. Donoghue's friend.
d)The party which placed the snail into the bottle of ginger beer.
Answers
The party held responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson was the manufacturer of the ginger beer.
In the Donoghue v Stevenson case, Ms. Donoghue consumed a bottle of ginger beer that was manufactured by the defendant, Stevenson. Unbeknownst to Ms. Donoghue, there was a decomposed snail in the bottle, which caused her to suffer from gastro-enteritis. Ms. Donoghue claimed that the manufacturer was negligent in producing a contaminated product, leading to her illness.
The House of Lords, in its landmark ruling, established the principle of "neighbour principle" which expanded the duty of care owed by manufacturers to consumers. The court held that the manufacturer had a duty to ensure that their products were safe for consumption, and they could be held liable for any harm caused by their defective products. This ruling set a precedent for product liability cases and extended the scope of liability beyond contractual relationships.
Therefore, in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, it was determined that the manufacturer of the ginger beer was responsible for Ms. Donoghue's gastro-enteritis due to their failure to ensure the product's safety.
Learn more about Stevenson here
https://brainly.com/question/30983683
#SPJ11
After receiving an application for reemployment, how soon should the agency restore a returning employee?.
Answers
Employees who have worked for more than 180 days must submit a reemployment application within 90 days.
What is reemployment?Reemployment is Re-employment is the reappointment of an employee who had a permanent appointment with the City at the time of their layoff from a layoff re-employment list. Company can hire the employ which can be left before.
Thus, Employees who have worked for more than 180 days
For more details about Reemployment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14307282
#SPJ1
separating offenders from the community furthers which goal of punishment?
Answers
Separating offenders from the community furthers the goal of punishment related to the concept of incapacitation.
Incapacitation aims to protect society by removing individuals who have committed crimes from the community and limiting their ability to commit further offenses. By physically separating offenders through incarceration or other forms of confinement, the risk they pose to the community is reduced during the period of punishment.
This approach is based on the belief that preventing offenders from having contact with potential victims or opportunities for criminal behavior enhances public safety. Incapacitation is one of the goals of punishment alongside deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution.
Learn more about rehabilitation
https://brainly.com/question/32155632
#SPJ11
A city government wants to track down people who run small business and do not pay the city’s $125 business licenses fee. The city hired a private detective to obtain IRS tax records of city residents and determine who has reported small business income to the IRS but not paid for a license.
a) What arguments might the city government give in support for this action? What argument might privacy advocates give against it?
Answers
One of the arguments that the city government could give in support of the action or levy and collecting taxes is that small business owner are beneficiaries of public infrastructure that are installed and maintained using public funds. Hence, it is only just and equitable for them to contribute to the repair and maintenance of such facilities.
The argument that privacy advocates may give against such taxes is that they already pay Company Income Tax to the IRS. Hence this is a duplication of tax.
What is the IRS?The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States, responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, the major body of federal statutory tax legislation.
The Internal Revenue Service is the nation's tax-collecting agency, and it is responsible for enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, which was adopted by Congress.
Learn more about taxes:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Summarize 1-3 Articles of the U.S. Constitution
Answers
Answer:
Article I of the U.S. Constitution establishes the legislative branch of the federal government, consisting of the House of Representatives and the Senate. It also outlines the powers of Congress such as the ability to raise taxes and regulate interstate commerce.
Article II lays out the executive branch, the President, and their powers such as the ability to make treaties and conduct foreign policy.
Article III establishes the judicial branch of the federal government, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. It also outlines the jurisdiction of the court system and the limits of the judicial powers.
Explanation:
What happens when a president doesn’t return a bill in 10 days and what is the exception to that rule?.
Answers
The president is exercising their veto power if the they don't return a bill in ten days. The exception to that rule is when Congress is in session during those 10 days.
The bill will automatically become a law because the Congress can override the president's decision with a supermajority vote of two-thirds of the members of both the House and the Senate.
The Constitution states that veto power is the ability of the authority to forbid or temporarily prohibit the execution of a bill that has been attempted and we're discussing the President's power here as the authority.
In the legislative branch's authority, vetoing refers to stopping a bill or the implementation of legislation passed by a legislature from becoming law, either permanently or temporarily.
Discover how to counter the power of the veto: https://brainly.com/question/4393314
#SPJ4
Read the paragraph.
According to The Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS), people experiencing unemployment are jobless. They are actively looking for work and are available to work if a job becomes available. The BLS gathers data about unemployment through monthly household surveys.
The author of “The Value of Money” wants to provide readers with more information about this topic.
Highlight the paragraph in the text where the information could best be integrated to achieve this.
Answers
Answer: Deflation is the opposite of inflation which is the first highlighted one!
Dont know why almost every vertified is wrong anyways I took the test and got 100%! Hope u have an amazing day!
The paragraph in the text where the information could best be integrated to achieve this will be Deflation is the opposite of inflation.
What's the paragraph about?Deflation is the opposite of inflation. Inflation is when the prices of goods and services rise over time, while deflation is when the prices of goods and services fall over time. This means that the purchasing power of money increases during deflation, as people can buy more goods and services with the same amount of money.
Inflation and deflation are both economic phenomena that can have a significant impact on the economy. It is important for central banks to monitor these factors and take steps to prevent either inflation or deflation from becoming too extreme.
Learn more about inflation
https://brainly.com/question/21586910
#SPJ1
an executive order is a binding directive issued by the president, within areas in which the president has constitutional authority, to members of the executive branch and private citizens or groups.
Answers
An executive order is a directive given by the president of the United States that governs how the federal government functions. Several sources provide the constitutional or legal justification for presidential directives.
An executive order is defined as.
A federal official or administrative agency may be directed by an executive order issued by the president of the United States, acting in his capacity as head of the executive branch, to follow a certain course of action or desist from following a specific course of action.
What is the term for a presidential directive that has legal force?
Principal Content Presidential Directives, a specific type of Executive Order that has the same legal standing as a law and specifies obligations for the Executive Branch, are used to set the Executive Branch's national security policy.
What is the name of a presidential order that functions as a law but is not approved by Congress yet has the same legal effect?
Executive orders do not require approval from Congress because they are not laws. In our current system of government, an executive order is one of the most often utilized "presidential" documents. Every American president has issued at least one since George Washington took office in 1789, with the total number (as of this writing) topping 13,731.
To learn more about George Washington please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/14598321
#SPJ4
Give 5 solutions on how the proletariat won't be exploited?
Answers
Marxist theory holds that capitalism exploits the proletariat by requiring them to accept low wages in exchange for using the means of production that belong to the bourgeoisie, a class of landowners.
How the proletariat won't be exploited?Marx said that the bourgeoisie controlled all the power and compelled the proletariat to choose risky, low-paying employment in order to live by controlling money and the means of production.
Despite being larger, the proletariat was helpless against the bourgeoisie's will. Since the proletariat must first achieve political dominance, develop into the nation's dominant class, and establish itself as the nation, it is already national, if not in the bourgeois sense.
Because the worker no longer owns the product, which now belongs to the capitalist who bought the proletariat's labor force in return for exclusive control over the proletariat's products and all profit made by them, the worker is estranged from his or her product.
Learn more about the proletariat, here:
https://brainly.com/question/7942319
#SPJ1
mandatory sentencing that gives repeat offenders longer prison terms is known as the
Answers
Mandatory sentencing that gives repeat offenders longer prison terms is known as the "three strikes law."
The three strikes law is a type of mandatory sentencing law that requires courts to impose harsher sentences on individuals who are convicted of three or more serious or violent crimes. Under this law, repeat offenders may receive significantly longer prison terms, ranging from 25 years to life in some cases. The goal of the three strikes law is to deter repeat offenders and protect the public from dangerous criminals. However, critics argue that it can lead to disproportionate and unjust sentencing, particularly for non-violent offenses. Some states have revised their three strikes laws or abolished them altogether in response to these concerns.
To learn more about three strikes law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/9040163
#SPJ11
The purpose of state workers’ compensation laws is to establish an administrative process for compensating workers for.
Answers
The state workers’ compensation laws establishes an administrative process for compensating workers for injuries that arise in the course of employment.
Who is a worker?A worker refers to an individual who is employed by an employer of labor in a business firm on a contract (part-time) or full-time basis, so as to perform specific tasks, duties or functions on a daily basis based on an agreed fee.
Across the world, the purpose of state workers’ compensation laws is to help establish an administrative process and standard policies for compensating workers for any injury that arise while performing their tasks, in the course of employment, regardless of fault.
Read more on workers here: https://brainly.com/question/26548590
Answer:
The state workers’ compensation laws establishes an administrative process for compensating workers for injuries that arise in the course of employment.
Explanation:
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answers
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
Melbourne Awesome Ltd supplies a wide range of folding bicycles. Melbourne Awesome Ltd derives Australian sourced income for the current tax year comprising net income from trading of $80,000, franked distribution from public companies amounting to $28,000, (carrying an imputation credit of $12,000), unranked distributions from resident private companies amounting to $25,000 and rental income of $5,500. Melbourne Awesome Ltd also have total deductions (Business Expenses) totaling $55,000.
Answers
Answer: $21450
Explanation:
Here's the remainder of the question:
Required: Calculate the net tax payable by All Sports Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019. (Assume company tax rate is 30%)
The following can be gotten from the question:
Rental income = $5500
Add: Net income from trading = $80,000
Less: Business expenses = $55,000
Add: Franked distribution = $28,000
Less: imputation credit = $12,000
Add: unfranked distribution = $25,000
Total income = $71,500
Net tax payable will be:
= 30% × $71500
= 30/100 × $71500
= 0.3 × $71500
= $21450
Human trafficking is considered a _____.
federal crime in the United States
federal crime in all nations of the world
misdemeanor in the United States
federal crime in the United Nations
Answers
Answer:
Federal crime in the United States
Explanation:
Human trafficking is considered a federal crime in the United States and can result in a 15 year sentence and even life sentences.
If, in particular, the article or source your reading is discussions human trafficking internationally or across the world, the answer is 'federal crime in all nations of the world'
However, if the source is discussing national crimes in the United States, the answer is the first one.
Hope I helped!
The emphasis on rehabilitation in our criminal justice system has produced substantially lower rates of recidivism. T or F.
Answers
True.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what are the primary causes of legislative turnover in the texas legislature?
Answers
Legislative turnover in the Texas Legislature is caused by factors such as retirement, electoral challenges, redistricting, public sentiment, scandals and party dynamics.
The majority of the causes of legislative turnover in the Texas Legislature include voluntarily leaving office, career changes, electoral difficulties, redistricting, public opinion and policy issues, scandals or ethical dilemmas, and party dynamics. Despite the fact that incumbents are free to run for reelection multiple times due to the lack of term limits some elect not to do so.
A change in leadership may result from competitive elections changes in public opinion, and dissatisfaction with the current crop of lawmakers. Additionally political landscapes can change as a result of redistricting every ten years. While party dynamics and internal disputes can have an impact on turnover, scandals and ethical problems reduce public trust. The Texas Legislature's turnover of lawmakers is influenced by a variety of factors.
Learn more about Texas Legislature at:
brainly.com/question/9323346
#SPJ4
Ben and Andrew are parties to a contract. They agree on a novation. The novation does not require A. the existence of a previous, valid obligation B. Agreement by all the parties to a new contract C. Performance of the original contract by all of the parties D. A new, valid contract
Answers
In the context of Ben and Andrew agreeing on a novation, the term that is not required for the novation process is: Performance of the original contract by all of the parties. The correct option is C.
A novation involves the replacement of an existing contract with a new one, which includes A. the existence of a previous, valid obligation, B. agreement by all the parties to a new contract, and D. a new, valid contract.
The performance of the original contract is not necessary, as the purpose of a novation is to change the terms or parties involved in the agreement, rendering the original contract no longer applicable. The correct option is C.
To know more about novation, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30766020#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Ben and Andrew are parties to a contract. They agree on a novation. The novation does not require
A. the existence of a previous, valid obligation
B. Agreement by all the parties to a new contract
C. Performance of the original contract by all of the parties
D. A new, valid contract
According to the deterrence argument, the purpose of legal punishment is to:______
Answers
According to the deterrence argument, the purpose of legal punishment is to prevent future crimes by discouraging potential offenders from engaging in unlawful activities. This is achieved through two primary mechanisms: specific deterrence and general deterrence.
Specific deterrence targets the individual offender by imposing penalties that discourage them from repeating their criminal behavior. For example, when an individual is sentenced to prison for a crime, the punishment serves as a deterrent by making them aware of the consequences of their actions and preventing them from committing the same offense in the future.
General deterrence, on the other hand, aims to deter potential offenders in the wider community from engaging in criminal activities. By publicly imposing legal punishment on convicted offenders, the criminal justice system sends a message to society about the consequences of breaking the law, thus discouraging others from committing similar offenses.
The deterrence argument is based on the assumption that individuals are rational beings who weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. As such, legal punishment serves as a powerful disincentive for criminal behavior, as potential offenders are likely to perceive the negative consequences of their actions as outweighing any potential benefits. In this way, the deterrence argument posits that legal punishment helps maintain social order by reducing the prevalence of crime.
For more about primary mechanisms
https://brainly.com/question/10583168
#SPJ11
Do you know what human rights are
Answers
Answer:
yes and they are inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more
Explanation:
Which direction are the courts moving regarding the rights of the accused?
a. away from individual protections and toward enhanced government powers
b. toward more individual protections and less government powers
c. more power is given to grand juries to determine guilt or innocence
d. more power is given to local judges and less to federal judges
Answers
The direction of the courts has been towards more individual protections and less government powers. So, The correct answer is Option B.
This means that the courts are placing a greater emphasis on ensuring that the rights of the accused are protected, and that the government does not have too much power to restrict these rights.
One example of this trend is the Supreme Court's decision in the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. This case established the Miranda warning, which informs suspects of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning.
This warning is now required to be read to all suspects in police custody, and is an example of the courts moving towards more individual protections.
To read more about legal system, visit- https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ11
Members who lose their eligibility for the d-snp due to a change or loss of medicaid status are responsible for what cost sharing?.
Answers
Medicaid cost sharing is the responsibility of the members who lose their eligibility for the D-SNP as a result of a change or loss in their Medicaid status.
What is Medicaid?Medicaid is the country's public health insurance program for low-income individuals, it should be highlighted.
Medicaid is the country's public health insurance program for low-income individuals, and it provides coverage to 1 in 5 Americans, many of whom have complicated and expensive medical demands.
The Medicaid entitlement is predicated on two guarantees: first, states are promised federal matching funds without a cap for qualified services delivered to eligible enrollees under Medicaid, and second, all Americans who fulfill Medicaid eligibility standards are assured coverage.
Learn more about cost on:
brainly.com/question/4953989
#SPJ1
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
Answers
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
Can the police impose penalties?A senior officer may discipline him by giving him a warning if it is claimed (by a citizen or peer) that he has been disrespectful, behaved improperly, abused his authority, or neglected to perform his task.
Enforcement of economic laws and the pursuit of economic crime in India are the responsibilities of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), a law enforcement and economic intelligence organisation. It is a component of the Ministry of Finance's Department of Revenue in India.
To know more about police visit:-
brainly.com/question/24655820
#SPJ9
Complete question:
In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?
A. It is the least effective training tool in communicating new state legislations or court decisions to experienced police officers.
B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.
C. It is usually given to new recruits before they join their police departments.
D. It is primarily used to weed out new recruits who underperform during their probationary period.
I’m just coming on here to say have a good day
Answers
Answer:
I hope you have a good day too
Answer:
aww, thank you!!
Explanation:
Have a good day too!
The way to the house ?
Answers
Answer:
what is the house in question
Explanation:
do yo have a screen shot
Insurance is the transfer of what
Answers
Answer:
The transfer of risk is an essential tenant of insurance contracts. When you purchase an insurance policy, the insurance company will agree to indemnify you for a certain amount of loss in exchange for your payment of a set premium
Discuss the politicization of the judicial process for selection
of U.S. Supreme Court Justices today and the qualifications you
think are important for a justice to possess.
Answers
The politicization of the judicial process for the selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices has become a prominent issue in recent times. Qualifications which are generally considered crucial
The nomination and confirmation of justices have increasingly become contentious and politically charged, as different political factions seek to shape the ideology of the Court to align with their policy preferences. This has led to heightened scrutiny of nominees' political leanings, judicial philosophies, and potential impact on key issues.
One aspect of the politicization is the ideological litmus test applied by political parties and interest groups during the nomination process. Presidents and senators often prioritize appointing or confirming justices who align with their party's values and policy objectives. This focus on ideology has led to heated debates and divisive confirmation battles, with nominees' records, speeches, and personal beliefs subject to intense scrutiny.
Another factor contributing to the politicization is the perception that Supreme Court decisions have significant implications for shaping public policy. Given the Court's authority to interpret the Constitution and make rulings on contentious issues such as abortion rights, voting rights, and civil liberties, political actors have increasingly viewed Supreme Court appointments as opportunities to advance their policy agendas.
When considering the qualifications important for a Supreme Court Justice, it is essential to prioritize qualities that ensure impartiality, competence, and respect for the rule of law.
While specific qualifications may vary, the following are generally considered crucial:
1. Judicial Temperament: Justices should possess a demeanor characterized by fairness, open-mindedness, and impartiality. They should approach cases with a commitment to interpreting the law rather than promoting personal or political agendas.
2. Legal Expertise: Strong knowledge and understanding of constitutional law, statutory interpretation, and legal principles are essential for effective adjudication. A justice should possess a solid foundation in legal scholarship and demonstrate the ability to analyze complex legal issues.
3. Judicious Decision-Making: Justices must exhibit sound judgment and the ability to weigh competing arguments in a thoughtful and reasoned manner. They should be able to evaluate precedent, consider the consequences of their rulings, and apply legal principles consistently.
4. Integrity and Ethics: A justice should have a demonstrated commitment to upholding the highest ethical standards. They should be impartial and free from conflicts of interest, maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and inspiring public confidence in the Court.
5. Respect for the Constitution: Justices must have a deep respect for the Constitution as the foundation of the legal system. They should possess a commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights and liberties.
It is crucial to emphasize the importance of selecting justices based on their qualifications and commitment to the rule of law rather than partisan considerations. Depoliticizing the selection process can help ensure the integrity and independence of the Supreme Court, allowing it to fulfill its vital role as a check on the other branches of government and a guardian of the Constitution.
To know more about politicization, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32340790#
#SPJ11
Explain the difference between cause and manner of death.
Answers
Answer:
Check the attached document
Explanation:
Can the decision-making model help you avoid saying things you regret later?
Answers
Answer:
yeah because they try to help you think of the consequences later
Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.
Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?
A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.
Answers
The statement that best summarizes the inaccuracies contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is that the Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is the Supreme Court?The court, which is the highest court in the United States, is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and the cases that are over state courts are looked after by the Supreme Court.
Any opinion, whether it is of the majority, dissenting or the final court decision, is expressed after hearing arguments from both the parties. They constitute the ruling of the Supreme Court over the case.
According to the given paragraph The Supreme Court firstly reaches a decision and then hears the parts, which is wrong. It is the duty of the Supreme court to hear any case that is appealed to it.
Therefore, Option A: The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it is correct.
Learn more about Supreme court from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ2
passed in 1984, what does the national organ transplant act address?
Answers
The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) was passed in 1984 and addressed various factors. One of its major functions was to address the nation's scarcity of organs for transplantation. It was enacted to improve the nation's organ transplantation system and to address the problem of organ shortages.
This Act also established the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which is responsible for coordinating organ transplantation and overseeing the distribution of organs to those in need.
NOTA also addressed several other important factors related to organ transplantation. It prohibited the sale of organs and established penalties for individuals engaged in illegal organ trafficking. This provision was intended to protect the integrity and ethical considerations of organ transplantation.
Overall, the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) played a crucial role in addressing the scarcity of organs for transplantation in the United States by establishing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and implementing regulations to ensure fair and ethical practices in organ allocation and transplantation.
You can learn more about NOTA at: https://brainly.com/question/24128652
#SPJ11