How does the Declaration describe “universal human rights”? Why is it important to protect universal human rights? In your opinion, which right or rights listed in the Declaration are the most important?

An effective pre-writing strategy for a student who wants to write an essay on their own theories about the Pauling Light phenomenon would be brainstorming and creating an outline.

1. Brainstorming: The student should begin by jotting down their thoughts, ideas, and theories about the Pauling Light phenomenon. This can be done in a free-flowing manner, without worrying about structure or organization.

2. Organizing ideas: Once the brainstorming session is complete, the student should review their notes and identify the main points they want to discuss in their essay. They should also look for any patterns or connections among the ideas that have emerged.

3. Creating an outline: Based on the main points identified, the student should create an outline to provide structure to the essay. The outline should include an introduction, the main body (divided into sections for each main point), and a conclusion.

4. Expanding the outline: After creating the basic structure, the student should elaborate on each main point, providing evidence, examples, and reasoning to support their theories. This will help create a clear and logical flow for the essay.

By using the brainstorming and outlining process, the student will be able to effectively organize and present their theories about the Pauling Light phenomenon in a well-structured essay. This pre-writing strategy allows for clear communication of ideas and creates a strong foundation for the final essay.

For more information on essay kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/11403000

#SPJ11

Answer:

We need more information on the passage but the definition for a artifact is

an object made by a human being, typically an item of cultural or historical interest.

Explanation:

Answer:

What the other person said. you can give him brainliest

Explanation:

Based on the fact that the belief that slavery is a morally offensive practice, this represents the kind of social norm known as taboo.

This refers to the type of accepted behavior or practice in a given society that is affected by time, culture, place, etc.

Hence, it can be seen that based on the four kinds of social norms which are: folkways, mores, taboos, and law, the one that best fits into the given description is taboo because it is seen to be morally offensive,

With this in mind, the correct answer is taboo.

Read more about social norms here:

https://brainly.com/question/27506293
#SPJ1

Answer: I dont fully remeber the story, but this is the best answer i can give

Explanation: Tradition means doing something over and over for a long time ussualy within family or culture. Tradition can be dangerous because lets say you had a tradition to maybe play russian roulette every year there is a risk of injury or death.  The setting of the lottery is in a small town where its sunny and has a good mood before the story starts. 2. The steps taken to insure the proper execution of the lottery is that everyone in the town has to gather and draw slips of paper. 3. What are the opinions of at least two townspeople regarding the lottery. Their opinions are that some people like as long as they are not the ones chosen. The mom in the story had won the lottery, and inturn had died from being stoned to death. I think they do this because of population control, or maybe they are sadistic

From her writing, Kathryn Hughes clearly considers the novel "The Boy in Stripped Pyjamas" by John Boyne to be a marvel. According to her, the relevance and finesse of the protagonist's narrative are that it comes through the lens of a 9-year-old boy.

According to Hughes, Bruno the protagonist's stubbornness becomes a metaphor for the thoughts of the adults who were in the camp with him during the holocaust.

Bruno, a little German kid growing up during World War II, lives in his own world of fantasy as a nine-year-old in The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. He liked reading adventure books and going on journeys to discover the lesser-known nooks of his family's sprawling Berlin mansion. Bruno had limited knowledge of his father's activities as an officer in Germany's Nazi Party. He also didn't grasp anything about the battle.

When Bruno returned home from school one day, he saw the family housekeeper, Maria, packing his possessions. Bruno's mother stated that his Father would be starting a new work shortly and that the family needed to relocate right away. A few days later, the family boarded a train to their new home. Bruno was not pleased with the new residence. It was not just smaller than their Berlin apartment, but it also struck him as chilly and lonely. To make matters worse, there were troops all over the place.

After a few weeks, Bruno decided to go exploring. After history and geography studies with his tutor, Herr Liszt, Bruno went for a walk along the fence seen from his window. He went for an hour before seeing a young man named Shmuel. Bruno and Shmuel sat on opposite sides of the fence, talking about their lives. Shmuel described how his family was forced to relocate to a congested ghetto and then board a train to come to this camp in a remote section of Poland.

Bruno broke the awful news to Shmuel about his upcoming departure, lamenting the fact that they had never gotten to play together fully. Shmuel received his own bad news: his father had gone missing. The two lads devised a strategy for their final day together. The following day, they executed their scheme. Bruno wanted to go home after looking in vain for clues to Shmuel's missing father.

Just then, a squad of soldiers approached Bruno and Shmuel, forcing everyone to march into a long, gloomy structure. Bruno held Shmuel's hand and assured him he was his best buddy as the doors were closed and horror erupted around the two lads.

Learn more about Kathryn Hughes:
https://brainly.com/question/19635306

#SPJ1

Answer: 1.  in a sonnet

2. The chorus hopes the performance the audience is about to see fills in any gaps in the story the Chorus has just told. or they want to tell the whole story to the audience

Explanation:

I might be wrong but I tried to help out also gg on the one who gets the brainlyiest.

Abstraction is the process of removing unnecessary details from a concept or idea in order to simplify it. In critical thinking, abstraction is important because it helps individuals focus on the most important aspects of a problem or situation.

By removing irrelevant information, critical thinkers can better understand the core issues at hand and develop more effective solutions. Decomposition, on the other hand, is the process of breaking down a complex problem or system into smaller, more manageable parts. This approach is important in critical thinking because it allows individuals to identify the root causes of a problem and tackle them one by one.

To know more about Decomposition refer :

https://brainly.com/question/24936069

#SPJ11

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. If he were alive today, he would probably revise his theory of inartistic proofs to account for changes in society and technology.

Aristotle's five inartistic proofs are the means of persuasion which are not developed by the speaker, they include laws, witnesses, contracts, oaths, and torture. Each of these proofs has the ability to change the minds of an audience, even though they are not created by the speaker. However, if Aristotle were alive today, he may have revised these proofs to account for modern technology and changes in society. Here are some possible changes to Aristotle's inartistic proofs.

1. Laws: Aristotle's definition of laws would probably still hold up today. However, in modern society, there are more laws than ever before. Additionally, laws are now easier to access than they were in Aristotle's time, thanks to the internet. This may change the way people view the legitimacy of laws, since they are more visible than they were in the past.

2. Witnesses: Witnesses are still a powerful tool for persuasion. However, social media has changed the way we view witnesses. Today, there are more opportunities for people to share their stories, and more ways for others to verify them. This means that a witness's testimony may carry more weight than it did in Aristotle's time.

3. Contracts: Contracts are still important in modern society, but they are no longer the only way to establish agreements. For example, digital signatures and online agreements are now widely accepted. This means that contracts are less tangible than they used to be, which may change the way we view their authority.

4. Oaths: Oaths are still important in many contexts, but they are less commonly used than they were in the past. Today, people may be more likely to rely on other forms of proof, such as witnesses or contracts. However, oaths still hold a certain amount of authority, especially in legal contexts.

5. Torture: Torture is no longer an acceptable means of persuasion in modern society. If Aristotle were alive today, he would likely recognize this and revise his theory of inartistic proofs to exclude torture.

For more such questions on Aristotle, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24994054

#SPJ8

Explanation:

The morbid curiosity of the audience was like a moth drawn to the flame of the macabre performance.

Answer

The Alchemist is the magical story of Santiago, an Andalusian shepherd boy who yearns to travel in search of a worldly treasure as extravagant as any ever found. From his home in Spain he journeys to the markets of Tangiers and across the Egyptian desert to a fateful encounter with the alchemist.

Explanation:

The type of poetry that allows poets to experiment with techniques of style in their poetry, like experiments on stanzas, and grammar, is free verse.

This refers to the type of poem where the poet is allowed to use poetic license and write without recognizable rhythm or structure.

Hence, we can see that when poets are allowed to experiment and write without any definite structure and use different styles, this is known as free verse.

Read more about free verses here:

https://brainly.com/question/1509140

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. The conclusion that can be drawn from this passage is that Gilgamesh is encouraging his brother to be courageous and face their current situation without succumbing to fear.

2. The evidence that best supports this conclusion is found in the following statements:

- "Courage, dear brother, this is no time to give in to fear."

- "You were raised in the wild, with your own hands you have killed marauding lions and wolves."

- "You are brave, your heart has been tested in combat."

- "Though your arms feel weak now and your legs tremble, you are a warrior, you know what to do."

These statements highlight Gilgamesh's understanding of his brother's bravery and past experiences. He acknowledges his brother's courage and reminds him of his ability to overcome challenges. By emphasizing his brother's background and accomplishments, Gilgamesh aims to motivate and reassure him in the face of their current situation.

Gilgamesh is shown as a motivational and courageous character in this passage, with evidence coming from his direct dialogue encouraging his brother to remain brave in the face of adversity.

From this passage, we can conclude that Gilgamesh is a very courageous and motivational figure. He emphasizes the importance of courage in the face of adversity, reminding his brother of their journey and all the obstacles they have overcome. His words reveal a strong, encouraging personality. The evidence supporting this conclusion comes from the direct dialogue of Gilgamesh in the passage- he directly urges his brother to be brave, harking back to his brother's feats as a warrior. The courage he exuding and the underlying motivation in his words portray him as a motivational figure.

https://brainly.com/question/34181903

#SPJ2

The hyperbolic that is used in the poem is the literary device that the author or the speaker uses for the process of over expressing the thoughts by the poetic lines.

In the poem Jane Eyre presents her poem in a which is easy to understand and also clear. Here she uses the line that there is  passing on and not grieve are the words that is used to show the emotions that is conveyed to the feelings of Helen's peacefulness and for her state of mind. Jane shows the various problems and struggles that are faced by the previous generation who were fighting for the equality and also for the domination of men over women. Jane also fought for the inequality that was faced by may women and also deal with the things where women were treated as inferior. She also says that she wants be as bird that is free from the restrictions. She also says that she is a free human who is free from the barriers and independent to take decisions.

To know more about the hyperbole emphasizes a young person's fear in Jane Eyre follow the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/2178841

#SPJ1

In the stories "Stray" and "Lone Dog," both narratives explore the theme of animals facing adversity and seeking a sense of belonging. While they share similarities in terms of their thematic focus, they also present distinct differences in their settings and character development.

"Stray" and "Lone Dog" both center around the experiences of abandoned or lost dogs who are trying to find their place in the world. In "Stray," the protagonist, Doris, is a domesticated dog who finds herself homeless after her owner passes away. Similarly, in "Lone Dog," the main character is a dog who becomes separated from his owner and must navigate the challenges of survival on the streets. Both stories emphasize the resilience and determination of these dogs as they face the hardships of their circumstances.

Despite their shared thematic element, the stories differ in terms of setting and atmosphere. "Stray" takes place in a suburban neighborhood, where Doris encounters various challenges and encounters with both humans and other animals. In contrast, "Lone Dog" is set in an urban environment, where the dog encounters a harsher reality of abandonment and struggles to find food and shelter. The contrasting settings contribute to the distinct tones of the stories, with "Stray" evoking a sense of familiarity and "Lone Dog" conveying a more gritty and desperate atmosphere.

The character development in the two stories diverges. In "Stray," Doris undergoes a transformation as she learns to adapt to her new life on the streets and forms connections with other stray dogs. Her character arc emphasizes the importance of companionship and finding a sense of belonging. On the other hand, the protagonist in "Lone Dog" remains a more solitary figure, focused primarily on survival rather than forming relationships.

"Stray" and "Lone Dog" share the common theme of animals facing adversity and seeking a place to belong. However, they differ in terms of setting and atmosphere, as well as character development. These distinctions contribute to the unique experiences and messages conveyed in each story, showcasing the diverse ways in which animals navigate challenging circumstances.

Learn more about Story :
https://brainly.com/question/27809354

#SPJ11

As a toxicologist, the Love Canal tragedy serves as a grim reminder of the devastating consequences of improper toxic waste management. It highlights the need for comprehensive site assessment, stringent regulations, and community engagement to protect public health and prevent similar incidents.

Today, I stand before you as a toxicologist to shed light on the crucial topic of "systematic management of toxic waste in Malaysia," drawing lessons from the tragic Love Canal incident.

The Love Canal tragedy unfolded in the 1970s in Niagara Falls, New York. The area was contaminated when the Chemical Company improperly disposed of over 21,000 tons of toxic waste. Residential areas were later developed on this contaminated land, leading to dire consequences. Heavy rainfall and inadequate containment caused the release of toxic chemicals, resulting in severe health issues among the residents.

This tragic incident emphasizes several key lessons. Firstly, it underscores the vital importance of thorough site assessment before any land development takes place. Understanding the historical usage and potential contamination of a site is imperative to prevent future harm.

Secondly, the Love Canal tragedy highlights the necessity of strict regulations and their enforcement in governing the handling, disposal, and containment of toxic waste. Stringent guidelines and robust oversight are essential to prevent similar incidents and safeguard public health and the environment.

Lastly, community engagement and empowerment are crucial factors. The affected residents of Love Canal played a pivotal role in raising awareness and advocating for their rights. Their activism led to the establishment of the Superfund program, aimed at cleaning up hazardous waste sites across the United States.

In conclusion, the Love Canal tragedy serves as a stark reminder of the dire consequences of improper toxic waste management. By embracing thorough site assessments, stringent regulations, and active community involvement, we can effectively manage toxic waste in Malaysia. Together, we can safeguard public health, protect our environment, and ensure a sustainable future.

Learn more about sustainable future here:-

https://brainly.com/question/3506352

#SPJ11

In my opinion, having faults and imperfections can make a character more compelling and relatable. While Westley from "The Princess Bride" is portrayed as a near-flawless character, this lack of faults may actually make him less relatable and potentially diminish the depth of his character.

Characters with faults and vulnerabilities are often more relatable because they reflect the complexities of real-life individuals. Flaws provide opportunities for growth, development, and the overcoming of obstacles, which can create a more engaging and dynamic narrative. They allow readers or viewers to connect with the character's struggles, empathize with their journey, and find inspiration in their ability to persevere despite their shortcomings.

Additionally, characters with faults and vulnerabilities are more realistic and human. They showcase the complexities of human nature and the internal conflicts we all face. By exploring and addressing these flaws, characters can evolve and transform throughout the story, making their journey more compelling and relatable.

On the other hand, a character like Westley, who lacks any discernible faults, may be perceived as too perfect and idealized. While this can create an air of charm and admiration, it can also make the character less relatable and potentially one-dimensional. Without any flaws or weaknesses, it becomes difficult for the audience to connect with the character on a deeper emotional level.

In summary, characters with faults and imperfections tend to be more compelling and relatable. These flaws provide opportunities for growth, complexity, and relatability. While a flawless character like Westley may be admirable, the absence of faults can make it challenging for audiences to truly connect with him on an emotional and relatable level.

For more such questions on Westley, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31049023

#SPJ8

The other examples the author includes of the technologies being implemented and the engineering feats are:

This question refers to the article "New York City, 1869," by Marcia Amidon Lusted:

Learn more about the topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/24302505?referrer=searchResults

Explanation:

The Third Amendment seems to have no direct constitutional relevance at present; indeed, not only is it the least litigated amendment in the Bill of Rights, but the Supreme Court has never decided a case on the basis of it.

The federal government today is not likely to ask people to house soldiers in their homes, even in time of war. Nevertheless, the amendment has some modern implications. It suggests the individual’s right of domestic privacy—that people are protected from governmental intrusion into their homes

1. Red herring: The distortion or misrepresentation of an argument to make it easier to knock down or refute.

2. Appeal to Pity: Attempting to gain support for a conclusion by evoking feelings of pity when pity is irrelevant to the conclusion.

3. Appeal to force (scare tactics): A threat to use force to get another person to back down from their position in an argument.

4. Appeal to ignorance: Arguing that something is true or false based on a lack of evidence.

5. Ad hominem fallacy: Responding to an argument by attacking the character of the person making the argument.

6. Popular appeal: Appealing to the opinion of the majority to gain support for a conclusion.

7. Hasty generalization: Drawing a conclusion based on atypical cases or insufficient evidence.

8. Straw man: Distorting or misrepresenting an argument to make it easier to refute.

1. Red herring: The distortion or misrepresentation of an argument to make it easier to knock down or refute. This fallacy involves diverting attention from the main issue by introducing irrelevant or unrelated information or arguments that lead the discussion off track.

2. Appeal to Pity: Attempting to gain support for a conclusion by evoking feelings of pity when pity is irrelevant to the conclusion. This fallacy manipulates emotions rather than providing valid reasoning or evidence.

3. Appeal to force (scare tactics): A threat to use force (physical, psychological, or legal) to get another person to back down from their position in an argument. This fallacy relies on intimidation or coercion rather than logical reasoning.

4. Appeal to ignorance: Arguing that something is true simply because no one has proven it false or that something is false simply because no one has proven it true. This fallacy exploits the lack of evidence or knowledge to support a claim.

5. Ad hominem fallacy: Responding to an argument by attacking the character or circumstances of the person making the argument. This fallacy focuses on personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the argument.

6. Popular appeal: Appealing to the opinion of the majority to gain support for a conclusion. This fallacy asserts that something is true or correct simply because many people believe it to be so.

7. Hasty generalization: Drawing a conclusion based on atypical cases, often due to a sample size that is too small or biased. This fallacy involves making broad generalizations without sufficient evidence.

8. Straw man: The distortion or misrepresentation of an argument to make it easier to knock down or refute. This fallacy involves creating a weakened or exaggerated version of an opponent's argument and then attacking that version instead.

These fallacies are common errors in reasoning and argumentation, and recognizing them can help to strengthen logical thinking and promote more effective communication.

Know more about refute here:

https://brainly.com/question/28704650

#SPJ8

The fact that Je-rome realizes that the mass of a ball of clay is the sa-me, no matter what its shape, indi-cates that he has achieved at le-ast the concrete operations. Piagetian stage of cognitive develop-ment and is able to compre-hend more than one aspect of a prob-lem at a time, i.e., he has achieved decentration.

In his the-ory of cognitive develop-ment, Jean Piaget pro-posed that humans pro-gress through four develop-mental stages: the sensori-motor stage, pre-operational stage, concrete ope-rational stage, and formal operational stage.

His theory focu-ses not only on under-standing how child-ren acquire know-ledge, but also on under-standing the nature of intell-igence.

To know more cognitive development click below:

brainly.com/question/10560579

SPJ4

Explanation:

The setting of the senior community center plays a significant role in shaping the characterization of Tressa. It provides a context that highlights her personality traits and showcases her relationships with others.

Firstly, the senior community center setting establishes Tressa as an active and engaged individual. The text describes her as someone who "was always on the go at the senior center" (Funny in Farsi, Chapter 19). This suggests that Tressa is enthusiastic about participating in various activities and events at the center, indicating her energetic and vibrant nature. Her consistent presence and involvement in the community center activities demonstrate her commitment to staying socially connected and mentally stimulated.

Additionally, the interactions Tressa has with other members of the senior community center reveal her sociable and caring nature. The text mentions that Tressa "took the time to chat with everyone" (Funny in Farsi, Chapter 19) and that she "made it a point to meet new members and make them feel welcome" (Funny in Farsi, Chapter 19). These actions highlight Tressa's warmth, empathy, and willingness to reach out to others. The setting provides opportunities for her to engage in conversations, forge connections, and create a sense of community, portraying her as a friendly and compassionate individual.

Furthermore, the senior community center setting allows Tressa to showcase her leadership qualities. The text mentions that she was "unanimously elected as the president of the senior center" (Funny in Farsi, Chapter 19). This position of authority implies that Tressa is respected and trusted by her peers. Her ability to assume a leadership role within the community center demonstrates her organizational skills, assertiveness, and ability to inspire and guide others.

In conclusion, the setting of the senior community center shapes the characterization of Tressa by highlighting her active participation, sociable nature, caring attitude, and leadership abilities. Through her interactions and engagement within this environment, Tressa's vibrant personality and positive impact on the community are effectively conveyed.

Answer:

sounds like fun lol

Explanation:

Answer:

That's why a lot of countries are going into lockdown 2.0

Explanation:

Answer:

The nutrients in this area are very important, so the ecosystem of the area is maintained.

Many of them are in charge of regulating the amounts of water, the growth of rivers in fluvial situations since with their burrows they are in charge of regulating water levels.

Explanation:

Furthermore, otters have a food chain that if they become extinct due to poaching or other reasons for human intervention, this chain breaks. The predator of this species will also be at risk of extinction and those foods that functioned as a food source for otters will begin to increase in population, thus generating an imbalance and a new ecosystem that could affect other species.

Answer:

The answer is "ALMOST"

Explanation:

The adverb in the sentence "Hold on, I'm almost finished!" is "almost.

An adverb is a word that modifies a verb, adjective, or other adverb. Adverbs typically describe how, when, where, or to what extent something is done. Adverbs can be used to add information about the frequency, manner, place, time, or degree of the action or quality described by the verb, adjective, or adverb they modify.

For example:

Adverbs are often formed by adding the suffix "-ly" to an adjective. For example, the adjective "quick" becomes the adverb "quickly," and the adjective "slow" becomes the adverb "slowly." However, not all adverbs are formed this way, and some common adverbs, such as "very" and "too," do not have a corresponding adjective form.

Learn more about adverbs, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8554630

#SPJ2

Answer:internal rhyme

Explanation: it rhymes

Answer:

I was scared to death

Explanation:

Answer:

I was scared to death

Explanation:

EDGE 2021