Answer:
The three layer of hair I know are medulla ( the center), the cortex (it surrounds the medulla), and the cuticle ( the hard outer layer) I hope this helps.
Explanation:
an individual's ability to file a case in court on the basis that his or her legal rights have been violated is known as: group of answer choices a petition. a prima facie case. a legal precedent. a cause of action.
An individual's ability to file a case in court on the basis that his or her legal rights have been violated is known as a cause of action.
Hence, the correct option is C.
A cause of action is a set of facts that enables a person or organization to file a lawsuit against another person. This may occur when there is property damage, bodily harm, financial loss, a breach of duty, or a right violation. A plaintiff must collect elements, or verifiable facts, in order to succeed in their intended cause of action. In order for the plaintiff to succeed, they must allege and demonstrate all of the relevant facts.A set of facts known as a cause of action constitutes a basis for pursuing legal action for compensation in a court of law.
Know more about "legal rights" visit
brainly.com/question/14390430
#SPJ4
Explain the theory of natural law, including the major arguments provided
If you caught an employee stealing one dollar’s worth of office supplies, what would you do? What about twenty-five dollars’ worth of supplies? One hundred dollars’? One thousand? Should employees be trained not to even take a pencil home? Would that type of training be worth the cost of the training itself?
Answer:
it's to hard to explain but why he is stealing stealing is not good he must be perfect on job and yes it cost of the training itself
Imagine you are the chief of police of your local community and have decided to
implement a community-oriented policing program. One of the issues confronting
your community is a phenomenon found in some urban communities called Stop
Snitching. Present your community-oriented policing program, including a specific
program that addresses this phenomenon. Be very specific; you are presenting this
to your department and community.
0
O
What is the legislation at issue?
The process of exercising the powers and functions, which are available in the hands of a body or an institution authorized by the government, is known as legislation.
What is the significance of legislation?For the purpose of passing of a legislation, it is important for someone to have an authority. A legislation can be passed, brought into effect, amended, modified or debarred by the bodies of a legislative assembly.
Hence, the significance of a legislation is aforementioned.
Learn more about legislation here:
https://brainly.com/question/782960
#SPJ1
Is QAnon a Threat to American Safety?
if a minor injures another person or damages another person’s property, he or she may be liable for such injuries or damages and may be prosecuted by the in a action.
This is true. If a minor is found to have acted or carried certain actions that have led to these they may be prosecuted for this action.
Who is a minor?This is the term that is used to refer to the person that is under the age of 18 years. That is the person is considered to be in their juvenile age and certain laws may not be applied to them.
The negligence of a minor that may result in harm or other forms of destruction on another person can be attributed to their parents. The courts may rule this as the fault of the guardians and the parents that failed to keep an eye on their ward.
Read more on Minor here: https://brainly.com/question/4196231
#SPJ1
Complete question
if a minor injures another person or damages another person’s property, he or she may be liable for such injuries or damages and may be prosecuted by the in a action.
T or F
Almost half of the US states have enacted so-called Right to Work laws. Explain what these laws are. Use your text and web sources to get a clear understanding of these laws, and whether they are fair to unions and union members. Look at the issue from both the union's point of view and from the point of view of employees who don't want union representation. Make your answer complete for full credit.
the critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Answer:
Double Jeopardy right
Explanation:
This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death
Explain the way Congress, the president, bureaucrats, and
citizens provide meaningful oversight over the bureaucracies.
1. Congress, the president, bureaucrats, and citizens provide oversight over bureaucracies through checks and balances, including legislative actions, executive orders, internal audits, and public engagement. 2. Oversight by Congress involves holding hearings, conducting investigations, and passing laws. The president exercises oversight through executive orders and appointments.
1. Congress, the president, bureaucrats, and citizens provide meaningful oversight over bureaucracies through a system of checks and balances, including legislative and executive actions, administrative procedures, and public engagement.
2. Congress exercises oversight through various mechanisms, such as holding hearings, conducting investigations, and passing laws to regulate and oversee bureaucratic agencies. Congressional committees play a crucial role in scrutinizing agency actions, reviewing budgets, and requesting reports from agencies. The president, as the head of the executive branch, exercises oversight through executive orders, appointments of agency heads, and the power to propose budgetary changes and policy reforms. Bureaucrats themselves are subject to internal oversight mechanisms, including internal audits, performance evaluations, and compliance with established procedures. Citizens can provide oversight through public engagement, advocacy, and holding elected officials accountable for the performance and actions of bureaucracies. Public participation in rule-making processes, submitting comments and complaints, and utilizing legal mechanisms such as Freedom of Information Act requests are ways citizens can contribute to meaningful oversight over bureaucracies.
Learn more about investigations : brainly.com/question/29365121
#SPJ11
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
if your visibility has been reduced by the headlights of oncoming drivers you should _____
If your visibility has been reduced by the headlights of oncoming drivers, you should: Dim Your Own Headlights; Look to the Right; Slow Down; Focus on the Road Markings; Use the Center Line; and Use Your Visor.
To lessen glare and increase visibility for you and other drivers, dim the headlights on your own vehicle. To prevent being blinded by approaching headlights, look to the right side of the road. By doing this, you can lessen glare irritation while keeping your orientation on the road.
Reduce distractions inside your car so you can focus more clearly on the road. Make use of the visor in your car to reduce glare from approaching headlights.
Learn more about headlights here:
https://brainly.com/question/22007798
#SPJ12
If your visibility is reduced by the headlights of oncoming drivers, you should avoid staring directly into the lights and instead focus on the right side of your lane. Additionally, consider reducing your car's interior light, ensuring your windshield is clean, or even using anti-glare glasses.
Explanation:If your visibility has been reduced by the headlights of oncoming drivers, you should adjust your gaze to avoid staring directly into the bright lights. Instead, try focusing on the right side of your lane, or where the white line should be. This may allow you to safely continue driving.
Another strategy is to reduce your car's interior light, as this can impair your ability to see in darker conditions. If these methods don't help, consider pulling over to a safe spot until your vision recovers or the oncoming vehicle has passed.
You may also want to ensure your windshield is clean, as dirt and streaks can make glare from headlights even worse. Investing in anti-glare glasses could be another potential solution for those facing this issue regularly.
Learn more about Driving in low visibility here:https://brainly.com/question/32108220
#SPJ12
Did Conway act ethically in this case?
Who wins?
Do you believe the outcome was fair and equitable?
Do you agree with the court's opinion? Were there other things that the court should take into consideration?
reference:
Gilroy v. Conway, 391 N.W.2d 419, 1986 Mich. App. Lexis 2633 (Court of Appeals of Michigan, 1986
In the case of Gilroy v. Conway, 391 N.W.2d 419, 1986 Mich. App. Lexis 2633 (Court of Appeals of Michigan, 1986), Conway did not act ethically.
The following reasons can be used to back up the assertion:
Firstly, Conway did not provide Gilroy with a good reason for terminating his contract without cause. Even though the contract had an 'at will' provision, which gave Conway the authority to end the agreement without cause, the contract also required the parties to act ethically and in good faith. This means that Conway should have given Gilroy a justifiable reason for ending the contract.Secondly, Conway made an ambiguous statement that misled Gilroy into believing that his services were still required. When Gilroy requested a definite answer about the project's duration, Conway did not provide one. Instead, he provided an ambiguous response that led Gilroy to believe that his services were still needed.Thirdly, the court stated that the case was not fair and equitable. This was because Conway's defense relied on inadmissible hearsay evidence that was prejudicial. According to the court, the hearsay evidence lacked foundation, and there was no opportunity to cross-examine the declarant. In conclusion, Conway did not act ethically in this case. The court's opinion was correct since Conway violated the terms of the contract by not providing Gilroy with a justifiable reason for terminating his contract without cause. The outcome was not fair and equitable since Conway's defense relied on inadmissible hearsay evidence that was prejudicial. The court should have taken into consideration the ethical requirements of the contract, which Conway breached by terminating the agreement without cause and misleading Gilroy about the project's duration.
To Know More about consideration visit:
brainly.com/question/33159085
#SPJ11
a plaintiff has sued a defendant, alleging that she was run over by a speeding car driven by the defendant/
The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant
The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.
The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.
For such more question on lawsuit:
https://brainly.com/question/30707234
#SPJ11
Do you support a second impeachment trial?
Simple.yes. Do you need any information lol?
If a business owner is having trouble staying within her budget, which of the following would be the best first move to reduce spending? A. Selling off some equipment and not buying more B. Turning off the water or gas briefly C. Eliminating weekly janitorial service D. Moving the office into a lower rent building
Answer: As ghdmwr6gr9 said, the answer is C
Explanation: I just took the quiz
3
Select the correct answers.
Which event is likely to be a turning point in an Individual's life?
A a football tournament
В.a birthday celebration
C. New Year's party
D. a military career
Answer:
i would say a military career :) sorry if it's not right
Explanation:
Answer:
a military career
Explanation:
because when doing a b and c is a one time thing doing a millinery career can take up from1 year+
Which statement would best support the claim that the government and
private citizens should cooperate in developing public policy?
O A. Government leaders have the greatest expertise in solving
problems in our country.
O B. Creating good policies requires both in-depth knowledge of
government and fresh ideas from outside government.
C. The best ideas for solving problems in our society come from
ordinary people.
O D. Public policy is not as important as how people act within their
own families and communities.
Increasing line of sight and path of travel is a good idea when driving at higher speeds because it helps a driver to remain prepared.
a)
True
b)
False
It is true that Increasing line of sight and path of travel is a good idea when driving at higher speeds because it helps a driver to remain prepared. Thus, the correct answer is option (a).
What is a line of sight?
The fictitious line that connects the observer and the target is called the line of sight (LOS). Line of sight in communications refers to both the straight path between a transmitter and a receiver and any potential obstacles in that path.
Line of Sight, also known as Sight Distance, is the length of the road surface that a driver can see while maintaining a reasonable reaction time.
The series of consecutive positions your vehicle takes as it moves toward your destination is known as the path of travel. Unless other circumstances modify the location of your car and cause you to change your direction of travel, you will typically stay in the middle of a driving lane when travelling straight ahead.
Therefore, the statement is true.
To learn more about line of sight, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28150749
#SPJ2
Consider and explain what this type of research might mean for the future?
Answer:
It will help develop the lives of citizens
t/f The two forces of a 3rd law pair always act on different objects
The given statement "The two forces of a 3rd law pair always act on different objects" is True because according to Newton's third law of motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
This law highlights the reciprocal nature of forces in a physical interaction between two objects. When one object exerts a force on a second object, the second object simultaneously exerts a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction on the first object.
It is important to note that the forces involved in a third law pair always act on different objects. This principle ensures that the action and reaction forces are exerted on separate entities within the system. For example, if you push a wall, the force you apply is the action force, and the reaction force is exerted by the wall on your body. The action force acts on the wall, while the reaction force acts on you.
This concept holds true for various scenarios. When a person walks on the ground, their foot exerts a force backward on the ground (action), and the ground simultaneously exerts an equal and opposite force forward on the person's foot (reaction). Similarly, when a rocket propels itself through space, the action force is generated by the expulsion of gas out of the rocket's engine, and the reaction force is the forward thrust that propels the rocket in the opposite direction.
To know more about law of motion :
https://brainly.com/question/29227915
#SPJ4
5. Who can use the 60- or 70-hour limit?
A. Only drivers with carriers who have a CMV in
operation every day of the week can use the
70-hour limit.
B. All drivers can use the 60-hour limit toward their
driving and on-duty time when instructed to do so by
their carrier
C. Eligible carriers must give permission to drivers to use
the 70-hour limit.
D. All of the above.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
because all is drivers and drivers not use 90 above hour
only 60-70 hour lang
and this is carrier
make me brainless tyy hope it helps
All of the above can use the 60 or 70-hour limit. The driver cannot run a vehicle after spending 70 hours on the job during any eight-day period if the motor carrier operates every day of the week. Thus, option D is correct.
The driver cannot operate a vehicle after they have clocked 60 hours of on-duty time during any seven-day period if the motor carrier operates on fewer than every day of the week. The motor carrier must have commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in operation every day of the week in order to employ the 70-hour/8-day norm.
The 70-hour/8-day rule is a discretionary clause in that a motor carrier that has vehicles operating every day of the week is not obligated to utilize the rule to determine the hours of service for its drivers.
Therefore, option D is the ideal selection.
Learn more about Driver's Rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/31847567
#SPJ4
Agencies develop what
from legislative guidelines.
Answer:
Federal administrative law derives from the President, agencies of the Executive Branch, and independent regulatory agencies. Agencies are given the authority to create administrative law through laws enacted by Congress. The law comes in the form of rules, regulations, procedures, orders, and decisions.
8. Why can't the Vice President take part in
Senate Debate?
Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
Why can't the Vice President take part in Senate Debate?
The only constitutional obligation for a vice president is to preside over the Senate, except from taking over as president in the event of a president's demise or resignation. Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.
According to the Constitution, the vice president of the United States leads the Senate. The vice president officially preside over the receipt and tabulation of electoral votes cast in presidential elections in addition to acting as the meeting's presiding officer. He or she also has the only authority to break a deadlock in the Senate.
A vice president in the government is someone whose main duty is to take the president's position in the case of the latter's demise, resignation, or incapacity.
Learn more about Vice President :
https://brainly.com/question/18882530
#SPJ1
What does choosing a legal career involve? write a 250 word essay that describes your perception of the effort and study necessary to begin a career in law, and what the first year in your new career might be like.
The essay on what it entails in choosing a legal career is given below.
Choosing a legal career
A career in law requires commitment, reason, and attention. It is not simple to choose a career in law since, in addition to the opportunities, there is the weight of being a part of one of the most significant and prominent professions in society.
The practical benefit of knowing what you want from your career is that it will help you make better applications. Early on, you can start to customize your job experience, and any recruiter you work with later on will be able to see how well you know yourself.
The world is full of interesting and brand-new challenges every day. Both the cerebral and physical stimulus offered by this area of work are great. Every minute that presents a problem that needs to be solved is an opportunity for me to develop intellectually, learn something new, and become a better person as well as a lawyer.
Therefore, I chose family law because I value variety in my work. I like the thought that one day I might be in court, the next I might be looking over a complicated trust document, and the next I might be interacting with a distressed client.
Learn more about legal career from
https://brainly.com/question/19919946
#SPJ1
all contract are agreement but not all agreement are contract discuss
Civil Dialogue something that in the last 5 plus years has increasingly became more and more rare in our society. In your initial post describe a specific conflict you have had with someone that got out of hand to the point it affected the relationship. For instance most of us have had conflicting arguments over politics in the last 5 years or over if we should have to wear masks, whether January 6th 2021 was an attempt to overthrow the government, if we should allow immigrants into our country... Arguments and incivility have become quite common. So if our goal is to be build strong interpersonal relationships and to communicate effectively we should know that we can't be incivil to the people we want in our lives. We know once the rudeness starts - communication stops. If you can't think of a specific argument you have had with someone you can instead show and example of incivility you have seen on social media (such as Ye and Pete) or the news.
Conversational incivility is never expected. People who are truly knowledgeable and sage never behave rudely in social media conversations.
A positive and constructive discussion of a particular subject is always desired. When someone breaks the rules of civility, it looks like they don't know enough about the subject.
It is likewise found that many individuals offer mocking remarks and cruel analysis in the online entertainment. Many individuals utilize frightful words language that cross the constraint of fairness.
In any case, it should not hamper one's feeling. The discussion is also good if it is respectful and constructive. Individuals are of various perspectives and perspectives. There are people of various religions and cultures present. All individuals ought to regard one another.
In virtual entertainment we perceive the number of individuals that crossed the fairness and mutual respect. Even a lot of people said things that a gentleman would never say. Numerous people do not study and instead make insignificant remarks. It is detrimental to democracy.
The majority of nations imposed a lock down during the COVID-19 pandemic, and individuals were housed in boxes. Many individuals lost their employment and various individuals confronted extraordinary challenges.
Numerous individuals struggled greatly to earn a living. During that period many individuals upheld lock down and many individuals didn't uphold it. We observed instances of decency violations by enraged individuals on social media.
Learn more about Social Media:
brainly.com/question/31339287
#SPJ4
What resolution came about in response to the debate over legislative representation?.
The Great Compromise came in response to the debate over legislative representation
During the summer of 1787 the representatives to the constitutional convention in Philadephia debated for months on one issue which was about how congressional representation would be determined, after much deliberation, the delegates appointed equal state representation in the senate and proportional representation in the house of representation, which is called the "Great Compromise", or also the " Connecticut Compromise". such a unique plan resolved the most controversial aspectof drafting of the constitution for congressional representation.
To know more about The Great Compromise refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/6839536?referrer=searchResults.
To know more about the US. government refer to the link https://brainly.com/question/2496524?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not a FCC principle for EMS related responsibility?
Answer:
hhhhhkskskskskskisssss
an advocate of the washington consensus would most likely recommend which of the following for a developing country?
Answer:
Since there is no multiple choice to determine "which of the following" I will try to answer to the best of my knowledge.
An advocate of the Washington Consensus would most likely recommend the following policy prescriptions for a developing country:
Fiscal Discipline
Using sound fiscal policies to promote macroeconomic stability, such as reducing government expenditure and maintaining modest budget deficits.
Tax Reform
Tax reform entails broadening the tax base and minimizing tax inefficiencies in order to increase efficiency and produce income for public investments and social programs.
Trade Liberization
Trade liberalization refers to the process of opening up the economy to international trade by lowering trade obstacles such as tariffs and import quotas in order to stimulate economic growth and integration into the global economy.
Deregulation
Deregulation is the removal of unneeded rules and bureaucratic impediments to business formation, competition, and investment.
Privatization
Privatization refers to the sale of state-owned firms to the private sector in order to increase efficiency and productivity, promote competition, and attract foreign investment.
Market-oriented Exchange Rates
Adoption of market-based exchange rate systems to reflect supply and demand forces and increase export competitiveness.
Investment in Human Capital
Investing in Human Capital entails improving education and healthcare systems in order to generate a skilled workforce and boost overall productivity.
Secure Property Rights
Establishing and implementing laws to safeguard property rights in order to foster investment, entrepreneurship, and economic growth.
Extra Notes
Critics argue that the Washington Consensus' one-size-fits-all approach overlooks developing country conditions, requiring tailored policies and strategies for sustainable development.
Hope this helps! ^^