I need a smart tutor because the last tutor was wrong!

The probability that the next person will purchase one or more costumes can be found by dividing the number of visitors who purchased one or more costumes by the total number of visitors.

The total number of visitors is 105 + 41 + 8 = 154.

The number of visitors who purchased one or more costumes is 41 + 8 = 49.

So the probability that the next person will purchase one or more costumes is 49/154, which is approximately 0.32 to the nearest hundredth.

Answer:

9/10

Step-by-step explanation:

The first two digit number is 10 and the last is 99. That's a total of 99-10+1 numbers in all. That simplifies to 90. (Just like if we wanted to see how many numbers was 3,4,5, we would do 5-3+1=3 to get the total number.

Anyways, let's consider first how many 2 digjt numbers whose digits are equal. You have 11 22,33,44 55,66,77,88,99 which is 9 numbers total.

So the amount of 2 digits number whose digits differ is 90-9=81.

The probability that a 2 digit number have different digits is 81/90.

This can reduce. Divide top and bottom by 9 giving 9/10.

To match the graphs of cylinders a and b to cylinders P and Q, we need to analyze the relationship between the height of the water and the volume of water in each cylinder.

Cylinder P would correspond to graph b, while Cylinder Q would correspond to graph a.

The reasoning behind this is as follows:

Cylinder P, corresponding to graph b, shows a steeper increase in height with increasing volume. This indicates that the water level rises quickly as more volume is added, suggesting that the cylinder has a smaller cross-sectional area. Since height is directly proportional to volume for a cylinder, a smaller cross-sectional area would result in a higher rise in height for the same volume of water.

Cylinder Q, corresponding to graph a, shows a slower increase in height with increasing volume. This implies that the water level rises more gradually as more volume is added, indicating a larger cross-sectional area. A larger cross-sectional area would result in a smaller increase in height for the same volume of water.

In summary, the steeper graph b matches Cylinder P with a smaller cross-sectional area, while the gentler graph a matches Cylinder Q with a larger cross-sectional area.

For more questions on area, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/22972014

#SPJ8

Answer:

-8x-25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

4^2+3^2

=16+9=25

\(\sqrt{25}\)=5

Answer:

two map squares ☺️☺️☺️☺️

1. In this case, we want the reliability to be 95%, so the probability of not breaking down is 0.95.

2. Probability of no breakdowns = (reliability of a single machine)^3. Probability of at least one breakdown = 1 - Probability of no breakdowns

1. To determine how often the computer should be scheduled for maintenance, we need to consider the reliability and the desired level of operational condition. Since the duration for trouble-free operation follows a gamma distribution with a mean of 40 days, this means that, on average, the computer can operate for 40 days before a breakdown occurs.

To ensure operational condition with a 95% probability, we can calculate the maintenance interval using the concept of reliability. The reliability represents the probability that the machine will not break down within a certain time period. In this case, we want the reliability to be 95%, so the probability of not breaking down is 0.95.

Using the gamma distribution parameters, we can find the corresponding reliability for a specific time duration. By setting the reliability equation equal to 0.95 and solving for time, we can find the maintenance interval:

reliability = 0.95

time = maintenance interval

Using reliability and the gamma distribution parameters, we can calculate the maintenance interval.

2. To calculate the probability that at least one of the three machines will break down within the first scheduled maintenance time, we can use the complementary probability approach.

The probability that none of the machines will break down within the first scheduled maintenance time is given by the reliability of a single machine raised to the power of the number of machines:

Probability of no breakdowns = (reliability of a single machine)^3

Since the breakdown times between the machines are statistically independent, we can assume that the reliability of each machine is the same. Therefore, we can use the reliability calculated in the first part and substitute it into the formula:

Probability of at least one breakdown = 1 - Probability of no breakdowns

By calculating this expression, we can determine the probability that at least one of the three machines will break down within the first scheduled maintenance time.

For more such questions on Probability

https://brainly.com/question/23286309

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

tax

The joint costs allocated to Product B is $240,000.

We must allocate joint costs based on the relative physical quantities produced by each product.

The total physical quantity produced by both products is:

= Quantity of A + Quantity of B

= 10,000 + 40,000

= 50,000 pounds

We will calculate the proportion of physical quantity produced by product A:

= Quantity of B / Total physical quantity

= 40,000 / 50,000

= 0.8

The amount of joint costs allocated to Product B is will be

= Total joint costs x Proportion of

= $300,000 x 0.8

= $240,000.

Read more about Joint cost

brainly.com/question/31392604

#SPJ1

3 pounds 32 ounces < 14 pounds 40 ounces

1,000 pounds = 1 ton

1 pound and 5 ounces < 1.5 pounds

2 tons = 4,000 pounds

28 ounces > 25 ounces

The comparison of the values of the given weights is as follows:

3 pounds 32 ounces < 14 pounds 40 ounces

This is because there are fewer pounds and ounces in 3 pounds 32 ounces compared to 14 pounds 40 ounces.

1,000 pounds = 1 ton

This is because 1,000 pounds is equal to 1 ton.

1 pound and 5 ounces < 1.5 pounds

This is because 1 pound and 5 ounces is less than 1.5 pounds.

2 tons = 4,000 pounds

This is because 2 tons is equal to 4,000 pounds.

28 ounces > 25 ounces

This is because 28 ounces is greater than 25 ounces.

Learn more about ounces and pounds at: https://brainly.com/question/10618309

#SPJ1

Complete question:

Write the comparison using <, >, or =.

3 pounds 32 ounces vs  14 pounds 40 ounces

1,000 pounds vs 1 ton

1 pound and 5 ounces vs 1.5 pounds

2 tons vs 4,000 pounds

28 ounces vs 25 ounces

Answer:

sss

Step-by-step explanation:

The total area of the three triangles is square units is 36 and the area of the figure is square units is 60.

The triangle can be defined as a three-sided polygon in geometry, and it consists of three vertices and three edges. The sum of all the angles inside the triangle is 180°.

From the figure, the area of triangles can be calculated using the:

Area = (1/2)height×base length

Area of three triangle = 1/2(4×6) + 1/2(6×4) + 1/2(4×6)

Area of three triangle = 1/2(24×3) = 36 square units

Area of the figure = area of three triangle + area of the rectangle

= 36 + 6×4

= 60 square units

Thus, the total area of the three triangles is square units is 36 and the area of the figure is square units is 60.

Learn more about the triangle here:

brainly.com/question/25813512

#SPJ1

Answer: 275,400

Step-by-step explanation:

- First we do 18 multiplied by 20 which would get us the answer of 360

- Next we do 45 multiplied by 17 which would get us the answer of 765

- Now we multiply both 360 and 765 and get the answer of 275,400

Using Maxwell's equations, we can determine the magnetic flux density. One of the Maxwell's equations is:

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t}\),

where \(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{H}\) is the curl of the magnetic field intensity \(\displaystyle \mathbf{H}\), \(\displaystyle \mathbf{J}\) is the current density, and \(\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t}\) is the time derivative of the electric displacement \(\displaystyle \mathbf{D}\).

In this problem, there is no current density (\(\displaystyle \mathbf{J} =0\)) and no time-varying electric displacement (\(\displaystyle \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}}{\partial t} =0\)). Therefore, the equation simplifies to:

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{H} =0\).

Taking the curl of the given magnetic field intensity \(\displaystyle \mathbf{R} =2\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)\hat{a}_{z}\, \text{Am}\):

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{R} =\nabla \times ( 2\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)\hat{a}_{z}) \, \text{Am}\).

Using the curl identity and applying the chain rule, we can expand the expression:

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{R} =\left( \frac{\partial ( 2\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)) \hat{a}_{z}}{\partial y} -\frac{\partial ( 2\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)) \hat{a}_{z}}{\partial z}\right) \mathrm{d} x\mathrm{d} y\mathrm{d} z\).

Since the magnetic field intensity \(\displaystyle \mathbf{R}\) is not dependent on \(\displaystyle y\) or \(\displaystyle z\), the partial derivatives with respect to \(\displaystyle y\) and \(\displaystyle z\) are zero. Therefore, the expression further simplifies to:

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{R} =-\frac{\partial ( 2\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)) \hat{a}_{z}}{\partial x} \mathrm{d} x\mathrm{d} y\mathrm{d} z\).

Differentiating the cosine function with respect to \(\displaystyle x\):

\(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{R} =-2( 10^{10}) \sin( 10^{10} t-600x)\hat{a}_{z} \mathrm{d} x\mathrm{d} y\mathrm{d} z\).

Setting this expression equal to zero according to \(\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf{H} =0\):

\(\displaystyle -2( 10^{10}) \sin( 10^{10} t-600x)\hat{a}_{z} \mathrm{d} x\mathrm{d} y\mathrm{d} z =0\).

Since the equation should hold for any arbitrary values of \(\displaystyle \mathrm{d} x\), \(\displaystyle \mathrm{d} y\), and \(\displaystyle \mathrm{d} z\), we can equate the coefficient of each term to zero:

\(\displaystyle -2( 10^{10}) \sin( 10^{10} t-600x) =0\).

Simplifying the equation:

\(\displaystyle \sin( 10^{10} t-600x) =0\).

The sine function is equal to zero at certain values of \(\displaystyle ( 10^{10} t-600x) \):

\(\displaystyle 10^{10} t-600x =n\pi\),

where \(\displaystyle n\) is an integer. Rearranging the equation:

\(\displaystyle x =\frac{ 10^{10} t-n\pi }{600}\).

The equation provides a relationship between \(\displaystyle x\) and \(\displaystyle t\), indicating that the magnetic field intensity is constant along lines of constant \(\displaystyle x\) and \(\displaystyle t\). Therefore, the magnetic field intensity is uniform in the given medium.

Since the magnetic flux density \(\displaystyle B\) is related to the magnetic field intensity \(\displaystyle H\) through the equation \(\displaystyle B =\mu H\), where \(\displaystyle \mu\) is the permeability of the medium, we can conclude that the magnetic flux density is also uniform in the medium.

Thus, the correct expression for the magnetic flux density in the given medium is:

\(\displaystyle B =6\cos( 10^{10} t-600x)\hat{a}_{z}\).

Answer:

B. (-1,7)

Step-by-step explanation:

The expression 26+8 as the product of the GCF and a sum will be; 2(13+4).

Expression in maths is defined as the collection of numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Given that we have the expression as 26+8

We have to find the greatest common factor of the numbers 26 and 8.

26 = 2 × 13

8 = 2 × 2 × 2

Then Multiply all the prime factors, both numbers share in order to determine the GCF:

Therefore, GCF = 2

Now we can write the expression as;

26 + 8

=2(13 + 4)

=2×17

=34

Hence. the required expression will be; 2(13 + 4).

To know more about an expression follow;

brainly.com/question/19876186

#SPJ1

Answer:

2/6= 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

p=0.4

Answer and Explanation:

Probability of drawing a green marble is p=0.4.

Considering the given expression and the numerical values, it is found that it's value is False.

The expression used in this question is given as follows:

\((x - y) \times 2 > y\)

The values considered are x = 4 and y = 6, hence:

\((6 - 4) \times 2 > 6\)

\(4 > 6\)

Hence, it is a False expression, as 4 is less than 6.

More can be learned about expressions at https://brainly.com/question/25537936

Answer:

C. preserve

Step-by-step explanation:

When you translate something in geometry, you're simply moving it around. You don't distort it in any way. If you translate a segment, it remains a segment, and its length doesn't change. Similarly, if you translate an angle, the measure of the angle doesn't change.

1. Number of athletes did not own any of the three items = 259 - 228

= 31.

2. Number of athletes own a convertible and a TV but not a store = 44 - 9

= 35.

3. Number of athletes own a convertible or a TV = 110 + 91 - 44

= 157.

4. Number of athletes owned exactly one type of item = 60 + 13 + 71 = 144.

5. Number of athletes owned at least one type of item = 259 - 31

= 228

6. Number of athletes own a TV or a store, but not a convertible = 13 + 34 +71

= 118.

The number of athletes did not own any of the three items need to subtract the number of athletes who own at least one item from the total number of athletes surveyed.

Total number of athletes surveyed = 259

Number of athletes own at least one item = 110 + 91 + 120 - 15 - 43 - 44 + 9 = 228

Number of athletes who did not own any of the three items = 259 - 228 = 31.

The number of athletes who owned a convertible and a TV but not a store need to subtract the number of athletes who own all three items from the number of athletes who own a convertible and a TV.

Number of athletes who own a convertible and a TV = 44

Number of athletes who own all three items = 9

Number of athletes who own a convertible and a TV but not a store = 44 - 9 = 35

The number of athletes who owned a convertible, or a TV need to add the number of athletes who own a convertible to the number of athletes who own a TV and then subtract the number of athletes own both a convertible and a TV.

Number of athletes who own a convertible or a TV = 110 + 91 - 44

= 157.

The number of athletes owned exactly one type of item need to add up the number of athletes who own a convertible only the number of athletes own a TV only and the number of athletes who own a store only.

Number of athletes own a convertible only = 110 - 15 - 9 = 86

Number of athletes own a TV only = 91 - 44 - 9 = 38

Number of athletes own a store only = 120 - 15 - 43 - 9 = 53

Number of athletes owned exactly one type of item = 60 + 13 + 71 = 144.

The number of athletes who owned at least one type of item can use the result from part (1).

Number of athletes who owned at least one type of item = 259 - 31

= 228

The number of athletes who owned a TV or a store but not a convertible need to subtract the number of athletes who own all three items, and the number of athletes own a convertible and a TV from the number of athletes own a TV or a store.

Number of athletes own a TV or a store = 91 + 120 - 43 - 9 = 159

Number of athletes own a TV or a store not a convertible = 13 + 34 +71

= 118.

For similar questions on athletes

https://brainly.com/question/25631156

#SPJ11

Answer:

1296

Step-by-step explanation:

\(( \frac{72}{ - 2} {)}^{2} \)

simplify it with factor 2

\(36 \times 2 = 72\)

\(( - 3 6{)}^{2} \)

\(36 \times 36\)

\(\boxed{\Answer:{\boxed{\green{ = 1296}}}}\)

Answer:

  x = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the solution to 8-(x+12)=1.

Eliminate parentheses using the distributive property:

  8 -x -12 = 1

Combine like terms.

  -4 -x = 1

We like to have the x-coefficient be positive, so we're going to add x to both sides:

  -4 = 1 +x

Subtract 1 to get x by itself.

  -5 = x

The value of x is -5.

__

Additional comment

We could have solved this by adding 4 to both sides in the third step:

  -x = 5

Now, we need to multiply (or divide) by -1:

  x = -5

Any operation (add, subtract, multiply, divide, root, log, or any other function) is done to both sides of the equation, according to the properties of equality.

Answer:

Supplementary angle equals 180°  

Complementary angle equals 360°

Step-by-step explanation:

Conjugate angles are more or less related to complementary and supplementary angles. The sum of the two angles put together equals 360 degrees. The last angle that will be named is straight. The measure of the angle equals 180 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

values of d, g, and n :

d = 118°

g = 62°

n = 96°

The monthly cell phone bill when shared data equals zero is given as follows:

$26.

The slope-intercept representation of a linear function is given by the equation presented as follows:

y = mx + b

The coefficients of the function and their meaning are described as follows:

The intercept of the line in this problem is given as follows:

b = 26.

Hence $26 is the monthly cell phone bill when shared data equals zero.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/24808124

#SPJ1

Answer:

3.3

Step-by-step explanation:

7lb 3oz

3oz/16oz=.1875lb

7lb+.1875lb=7.1875lb

7.1875lb/2.2kg=3.27kg

The final answer is 3.3 kg (round to the nearest tenth).

Ratio basically compares quantities, that means it shows the value of one quantity with respect to the other quantity.

If a and b are two values, their ratio will be a:b,

Given that,

1 lb = 16 ounces

1 kg = 2.2 lb

To solve this type of questions, use ratio property,

Since,

16 ounces = 1 lb

⇒1 ounce = 1/16 lb

⇒3 ounces = 3/16 lb

Add 7 lb to 3/16,

= 3/16+7 = 7.1875 lb

Since,

2.2 lb = 1 kg

⇒1 lb = 1/2.2 kg

⇒7.1875 lb = 7.1875/2.2 kg = 3.267 kg

In round of the answer is 3.3 kg

To learn more about Ratio on :

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ2

Answer: 4

This problem requires basic division. If the restaurant divided 4/5 kg of butter with 1/5 kg on each dish, you would need to compute 4/5 divided by 1/5.

4/5 ÷ 1/5

Using the "KFC" method, or Keep, Change, Flip, you would keep the first number (in this case, 4/5), change the division sign, and flip the fraction to 5/1, or 5. We now have this:

4/5 x 5

To compute this equation, you must multiply the numerators of both of the numbers together. In this case, you would compute (4x5)/5, resulting with 20/5, or 4.

You can check this answer by re-multiplying the numbers together. 1/5 kg of butter per dish, multiplied by the total amount of dishes, 4, you would result in the original 4/5 kg of butter.

Hope this helps!